ARE THE EQUATIONS OF MAXWELL SUFFICIENT FOR ALL THE

ELECTROMAGNETIC PHENOMENA? (E.G. TESLA’S EXPERIMENTS?)

APPLYING DEMOCRITUS PRINCIPLE OF PARTICLE MATTER AND THE
LAWS OF NEWTON (NOT IN THE MOLECULAR MATTER BUT) IN THE
FIELDMATTER.

A presentation in National Technical University of Athens December 2023 (School

of electrical and Computer engineering) based on the book by Dr K. Kyritsis
“Solving the CO 2 Problem Solar Energy Stored in the Gravitational Field”
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357570637_Solving_the_CO_2_Proble
m_Solar_Energy_Stored_in_the_Gravitational_Field_The_unification_of_electrom
agnetism_gravitation_and_inertia

CONTENTS OF THE PRESENTATION

1. The ancient paradise of Democritus.

2. Dogmas of modern physics that enslave the mind and the evolution of the
civilization. (Section 3 of the book)
3.Classical experiments that are misunderstood. (Section 4 of the book)
3.2 Quantum computing, electrons, micro-electrons and nano-electrons? Section
14 of the book.
4.Optimal principles of balance between theory and practice (Section 2 of the
book)
5. The paradise of Democritus of the 21st century. ( The physical rather than
mathematical unified classical field = One and the same fieldmatter fluid) Sections
5,6 of the book
6.The experimental need for non-quantum corrections of the classical fields.
(Tesla etc.) Section 8 of the book
7. Some history of rumours.
8.The physical meaning of the potentials of the classical fields. Section 7 of the
book
9.The true non-linear laws and equations of the classical fields. Section 9 of the
book.
10.Fieldmatter sound in medicine? Section 10 of the book.
11. MAXWELL as linear approximation. Section 11 of the book.
12.EINSTEIN as linear approximation. Section 12 of the book.
13.Cheap solar energy from the heat of the fieldmatter? Sections 9 , 15 of the
book
14.Does MAXWEL and EINSTEIN allow for the existence of flying discs? (The
answer is No!)
15.The appropriate wisdom for the military and peaceful applications. First a
physical and mathematical theory and then engineering applications not vice-

1
versa. We do not apply what we can discover but we discover what we apply
safely for all. (Power, inequalities, and speed of evolution)
16.Epilogue. Sections 13, 16, 17 of the book.

1) THE ANCIENT PARADISE OF DEMOCRITUS.THE GOOD LUCK OF DEMOCRITUS.

THE STORY OF THE LIFE OF DEMOCRITUS AND THE DEMOCRITUS ANCIENT PARADISE.

The ancient Greek philosopher Democritus (460-370 B.C. long life of 90 years) was
born in Abdera of Thrace (see references [Democritus]) . He was the son of a rich
man, and inherited together with his brother a very significant size of fortune
compared to his fellow citizen in Thrace.
But unlike his brother who multiplied his part of the inheritance by business,
Democritus spent it in travelled to all the great centers of knowledge in his ancient
world, including Babylon in Mesopotamia. His philosophy and theory of the cosmos
(universe) was shaped by the idea of matter made from free permanent and
indivisible particles (atoms). When after many years return to Abdera, he was
finacially broke, which was considered a shape from his fellow citizens (to spend the
parental inheritance). So his brother offered him a small part of his fortune, so as to
be also an honourable citizen. Democritus was going every few days in the market of
Abdera, and was lecturing the people about what he had learned in his life-journey.
In particular of how with the idea of atoms of matter, the three material states , solid,
liquid and gaseous could be explained, and together with it, many other physical
phenomena, like the winds ,the sea waves, the lightning, the rain, the snow, the
clouds, etc. In all of his explanations, the ancient greek gods of the mount Olympus
ware absent. No god Poseidon to create sea waves, no god Aeolos to create the winds,
no godees Demeter, to create the clouds and rain, for the plants , no god Jupiter to
though the lightning. The humans were now the center of material universe who need
not be afraid of the wrath of the gods, and who could explore and dominate. This was
much liked by his fellow citizens who gave them money for each lecture, and we call
here the ancient paradise of Democritus. I consider Democritus, a lucky man

2
with good fate. The Roman public speaker Senekas, writes in his book about
spiritual peace of mind, that compared to Herakleitos who was crying, when she was
realizing the shortcoming and stupidity of his fellow citizens, Democritus was
laughing with good heart.
The main merit of this little presentation of the book above is in its physical ontology
(molecular matter, fieldmatter) and the physical interpretations, and not so much in
its mathematics, that many physicists can work out. The principle of the ancient
Greek philosopher Democritus, that matter, in any of its form, consists from
free and permanent particles, together with Newton’s law of momentum
conservation derives almost all of the facts in the current book. A unified theory
of fields at the classical laboratory scale is not mainly a new system of mathematical
symbols, but rather the mental images of a new realm of particle material
ontology (here of the fieldmatter and not so of the molecular matter) and a richer
system of expected physical phenomena. The Nobel prize winner physicist R.
Feynman often mentioned that he took great pleasure in making though simulations
with mental images of molecular matter fluids, by “seeing” their particle motions and
then the macroscopic fluid motion.

3
2) DOGMAS OF MODERN PHYSICS THAT ENSLAVE THE HUMAN MIND AND THE
EVOLUTION OF THE CIVILIZATION. (Section 3 of the book).

In the history of science, it is often that its evolution is prohibited by convenient

doctrines that many scientists implicitly believe. A most common such dogma is that
“Whatever we have not discovered, it does not exist” The correct of course is that
“Whatever we have not discovered, we do not know if it exists”. Here is the main
example. Let us assume that we count the layers of matter from the finer particles to
the larger size. Many any scientists under this dogma tend to believe that
“Matter starts and consists from the triad of free and permanent particles
proton, neutron electron”. But this is a wrong belief. The fact that we have not
observed directly smaller free and permanent particles does not mean that matters
starts with this triad of particles. The correct belief is of course “We do not know at
what depth and with what small free and permanent particles that material
physical reality starts”.
To quote here Sir John Marks Templeton “If you think you know it all it is
less likely you will learn more” , “The Unknown is not unknowable and it is
vastly greater than the known” Plato quote” Knowledge is soul remembrance”

This “openness” about how deep is the material reality is of utterly importance
and I explain with 2 famous examples! If you think you know all layers of matter
than exists and all free and permanent particles end with particles like electron,
proton, neutron, photon, then
1) the definition of space will be obligatory and forever be with measurements
by photons as Einstein suggested and any curving of the path of photon due to
gravitation will be a curvature of the space too. But if not and how deep is matter is
open, then the curving of the path of photon is not a forever curvature of space
and instead it is more likely that it occurs in a straight without curvature space.
2) Similarly the measurement of the momentum and position of particle will
obligatory and forever be with photons, electrons neutrons, protons and the
indeterminacy relations of Heisenberg will be forever laws of the physical reality. On
the other hand, if how deep is matter is open then the indeterminacy relations
are not forever and are simply restrictions of a class of experiments and a state
of the art of evolution of physics and its technology.

4
 Obviously the “openness” is in favor of the evolution of sciences towards a
better knowledge, while the “closeness” about how deep is material reality is in
favor of a not evolving our knowledge.

Another confusion is relevant to the fields like electromagnetic gravitational etc.

When a physicist is asked what is e.g. the electromagnetic field, he tends to define it
by some mathematical function that gives a map of virtual interactions of electrons
or protons in “empty” space. But this is wrong and the ontology of a field does not
belong to the ontology of mathematical entities but to the ontology of physical
entities. These physicists tend to perceive physical reality as consisting from matter
and fields. Except they never give a clear physical ontology definition about what is
a physical field, and resort to mathematical ontology instead. If they try to give a
purely physical ontology definition of field it turns out that it is a kind of infinite
divisible matter, which we know by now that is a wrong concept. Since e.g. the
electromagnetic field has energy density in space, momentum and inertia, and waves
of energy and inertia in it, these physicists tend to perceive it as …..infinite divisible
finer matter. This is again wrong because we know by now, that in nature there is not
such a thing as infinite divisible matter. And what is correct? The obvious: That
since fields like the electromagnetic field , gravitational field. have energy
density in space, momentum and inertia, and waves of energy and inertia in it,
they are simply MATTER. We will call the matter of fields in this paper
FIELDMATTER, to distinguish it from the coarser matter consisting from the free
and permanent triad of particles proton, electron neutron which we will call
MOLECULAR MATTER. Obviously the fieldmatter is a finer resolution matter
compared to the molecular matter. Under this perspective there is not such a thing
as absolute material vacuum, (the quantum vacuum field actually is the
unavoidable presence of the gravitational field and it is thus the fieldmatter) but
there is a relative concept of vacuum that of “vacuum of molecular matter”. On
this there is an article from the famous physicist and Nobel price winner P. Dirac who
writes that we are forced by the observables of the physical reality to accept the
physical existence of fieldmatter (See [Dirac P.A.M 1951]
As matter that the fields are (fieldmatter) and as there is no infinite divisible
matter, obviously they consist from material indivisible (free and permanent) that are
particles that we have not yet directly observed and we may call fieldmatter-
particles.. In the paragraph about the EPR paradox we will discuss the existence of
deeper and finer resolution 3rd field material realms.

5
3) CLASSICAL EXPERIMENTS THAT ARE MISUNDERSTOOD. (Section 4 of the book)

The next table shows the experiments and what they prove.
Table 1
EXPERIMENT WHAT IT PROVES

BROWNIAN MOTION (1820) PROVES THAT MOLECULAR MATTER IS

MADE FROM FREE PERMANENT
PARTICLES

SHROEDINGER MOTION (1925) PROVES THAT FIELDMATTER IS MADE

FROM FREE PERMANENT PARTICLES
(Micro-electrons, micro-protons, micro-
neutrons)

DOUBLE-SLIT ELECTRON EXPERIMENT PROVES THAT THE FREE AND

(1927) PERMANENT PARTICLES THAT THE 1st
FIELDMATTER IS MADE FROM ARE
POSITIVE , NEGATIVE AND NEUTRAL

EPR paradox experiments, Experimental There is a deeper physical material reality of a

proofs in the Nobel prize in physics 2nd fieldmatter fluid, which is made from nano-
electrons, nano-protons , nano-neutrons. The
2022
speed of the “light-wave” in the 2nd
fieldmatter is faster than the speed of the
light-wave in the 1st fieldmatter.

In 1998 I was invited by the British aerospace to expalin the gyroscope effect
mentioned by H. Aspden (see [Aspden,H] a) ), and performed by the British
Aerospace too in 1998. (see references [Aspden, H.] ). It was a gyroscope as in the
figure 1 below, which when rotated in the air due to the magnus effect (see
references [Magnus effect]) of aerodynamics (air-plane wings) the outer cylinders
were lifting by an angle. The “strange” thing was that even if it was rotated in air
vacuum, the outer cylinders would still lift by a smaller angle. Was it ant-gravity an
known interaction? According to our perception of the finer fieldmatter, the
explanation was that although in air-vacuum, it was not fieldmatter vacuum, and a

6
weaker similar effect of fluid dynamics in the (neutral) fieldmatter would occur.
Should we call such weak interaction anti-gravity? Should we call them laboratory
scale weak interactions? Should we call them inertial phenomena of molecular mass
coupled with the fieldmatter? The term is not so important compared to the intuition
of the physical ontology of fieldmatter interacting with the fieldmatter. There was
even an author (see references [Hayasaka,H.Tackeuchi S.]) who experimentally
verified a formula about the relation of the velocity of the molecular matter and the
induced velocity in the neutral fieldmatter which turned out be somehow
proportional by a constant. We will come back to this weak interaction of molecular
matter motion and induced fieldmatter motion but a much more microscopic scale in
the paragraph 12.

Figure 1 (It seems to the author that the way that B.A. performed the
experiment was with the gyroscope upside down compared to the figure).

7
 The gyrodrop experiment of B De Palma (See references [ Depalma B
gyrodrop experiment] is a similar simple and astonishing experiment that can be
easily performed even at high school physics lectures. We drop a cylindrical metal
object A in the air vacuum in two ways 1) A is not rotating around its cylindrical
axis of symmetry 2) A is rotating around its cylindrical axis of symmetry. Normally
the mainstream of physical thinking in University Education, that considered the air
vacuum as material vacuum too, would expect that the measurement ofteh final
velocity of A in the table, is actually an estimation of the gravitational acceleration g
and it is the same in both cases 1) and 2) . BUT the experiment shows that according
to the orientation of the self-rotation of A, the rotating cylinder will reach faster the
table compared to the non-rotating cylinder A. Below are the image (Figure 2, 3) of
the statistics of the iterated experimental measurements. Again the true explanation is
simple, the rotating cylinder when falling is falling in air vacuum but not vacuum
from the neutral fieldmatter, and thus a weak fluid dynamic effect is created which
adds or subtracts from the velocity due to the gravitation.

Figure 2

8
 Figure 3.
The discovery that matter is not infinite divisible but consists of free and
permanent particles (initially called atoms) was a one of the greatest discoveries in
the history of the physical science and opened new roads of meaningful
understanding of nature and an abundant of technology. A Nobel prize was given for
this to A. Einstein for his paper o Brownian motion and photoelectric effect (1905)
but this Nobel prize should be given to L. E. Boltzmann for his voluminous work on
the statistical atomic theory of the gasses almost 50 years earlier. Actually it is know
that ancient Greek philosopher and thinker Democritus lectured on the Democritus
principle that the ontology of the physical reality is only vacuum and matter nathing
else, and that matter always consists from indivisible or atoms. This was know in
ancient Greece as the Paradise of Democritus. Therefore, any enhancement and
multiplication of this principle of atomic structure of matter will similarly bring
proportionally great new discoveries and even more meaningful understanding of the
material reality. And such an enhancement is the layered atomic structure principle
of paragraph 1, 2 , in other words that the material reality exists in discrete orders of
scales and discrete layers , each layer created by free and permanent material
indivisibles or atoms or particles. The denser the layer the smaller the constituent

9
particles. Applying this principle to the fieldmatter of paragraph 3 we conclude
that the electromagnetic field and the gravitational field consists of three types
free and permanent material indivisible or particles of positive, negative and
neutral charge.
We know that this is true for the molecular matter by the protons, electrons, and
neutrons that we may denote here respectively by the symbols (p+ e- n0).
Therefore, we can call these fieldmatter particles micro-proton, micro-electron
and micro-neutron and denote them by the symbols (μp+ μe- μn0).

We understand as the main phase of the fieldmatter that we observe as classical

field to be that of a gas, not of a liquid or solid-state. But this does not mean that in
the universe will not exist also liquid and sold-state forms of the fieldmatter making
whole planets. Furthermore even as gas we may have various forms exactly as with
molecular matter, that we have e.g. plasma-state where the triad of (p+ e- n0) is free
and separate, or as e.g. molecular air where they are combined in atoms. Exactly the
same occurs with the triad (μp+ μe- μn0) and gas forms of the fieldmatter.
But which experiments prove the existence of these particles? Let us recall that
the existence of the material indivisibles of the molecular matter was considered as
proved by the Brownian motion of the dust in liquids which was an experiment
known since 1820 and realized that it proves the existence of atoms only by 1905.
Similarly, now (2021) we should consider the Schrödinger random motion of an
isolated electron (see references [Schrödinger equation 1925]) as the proof of the
existence of the material indivisibles constitution of the fieldmatter. And why these
particles are not all neutral and are positive, negative and neutral? This is proved by
the double spit electron experiment (see references [Double-slit experiment 1927]),
where an electron as to moves attracts opposite charge particles of the fieldmatter,
which pass as waves through both spits and are photographed with interference wave
patterns on the photographic surface The electron itself passes by one only of the two
slits. The equations for the coupling of the particle AND wave in a more macroscopic
level than that of the Schrödinger equations is stated in the sections 9,12 of the above
book.

10
3.2) QUANTUM COMPUTING, ELECTRONS, MICRO-ELECTRONS AND
NANO-ELECTRONS? Section 14 of the book.

In the history of physic there were experiments that proved something important
but this was not realized but almost one century later. One famous example was the
Brownian motion discovered around 1820, which it was realized only in 1905 that
proved the existence of atoms. In this paragraph we discuss that the EPR paradox is
another such class of experiments. In such cases of the history o physics holds the
rule: “We do not believe what we see but we see what we believe”

In 1935 Einstein trying to prove incorrect the formulations of quantum

mechanics for the physics of elementary particles, he devised a thought experiment
where two particles after some quantum phenomenon in entangled state , where
separated to a great distance e.g.one in Tokyo and the other in New York. Because
of laws of quantum mechanics any measurement in the position or momentum of
the one would predict that of the other, which proves information exchange (there
fore a type of unknown interaction) faster than light. And as he was sure that the
axiom of his special relativity that nothing goes faster than light was proved
experimentally he concluded that the formation of quantum mechanics is incorrect
and incomplete. See in references [EPR paradox]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox. Nevertheless, we know by now with the
current article that the axiom of Einstein that nothing goes faster than light is not
really proved from the formulae of special relativity (see paragraph 12) and on the
contrary such an interaction faster than the light may occur and is included in the
formulation of quantum mechanics know by now as non-locality, and non-local
interactions. This paradox did not remained at the level of thought experiments but
was tested and verified experimentally (See [Aspect, Alain 1982], [Hensen, B, et al.
(October 2015)], [Giustina, M, et al. (December 2015)], [Rowe MA, et al.
(February 2001)], [Shalm, LK, et al. (December 2015).]) Modern interpretations
of the non-locality of quantum mechanics tend to cover-up this discrepancy and
claim that non-locality does not necessarily violates the axiom that nothing goes
faster than light mainly because it cannot be classified to any of the existing known
interactions of electromagnetism, gravitation etc. But the truth is that it is 100%
correlation of events in a seemingly instant way (seemingly infinite speed). .And
this does prove the axiom that nothing goes faster than light as wrong and this is the
reason that Einstein noticed it and was annoyed by it. . This class of experiments of

11
non-locality prove nevertheless something even more important: Because indeed all
interactions are eventually reduced to local interactions which is the base of the
physical causality through matter, ,the explanation of the non-locality is that it
exist at least one more finer density (and higher frequency) material layer beyond the
field matter of the classical fields which again by a guess of minimalism and
simplicity would consists from a new triad od free and permanent particles of
negative positive and neutral polarity that we may call nano-electron , nano-proton
and nano-neutron and denoted by (νp+ νe- νn0). Thus so far matter exist in at
least 3 layers or densities and created by 3 triads of particles that we have
denoted by proton-electron-neutron (p+ e- n0) micro-electron etc (μp+ μe- μn0)
mano-electron etc (νp+ νe- νn0). Then the explanation of the class of non-
locality experiments is that the phenomenally non-local interaction are
essentially local interactions through “light” waves of the 3rd layer matter (2nd
fieldmatter) which naturally is expected to travel faster than the light of the 1st
fieldmatter (classical electromagnetic field) but not in infinite speed. And indeed
as most relevant resetachers notice it isnot any of the known interactions of the
1st fieldmatter, that we know. This also includes the postulate that the particles
are a “chord” of material frequencies and knot of vortex motions in many
layers material realities We should remark also that this class of experiments do
not exclude the possibility of a 3rd higher frequency material reality (pico-
electron etc) . The Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 which was awarded to Alain
Aspect, John F. Clauser and Anton Zeilinger “for experiments with entangled
photons, establishing the violation of Bell inequalities and pioneering quantum
information science” concludes that Einstein’s concept of locality (=nothing goes
faster than light) and realism is wrong, exactly as we reveal in the current book. On
the other hand, quantum mechanics would become much more complete if we
include the finer 2nd fieldmatter. As quantum computing has the ambition of
computations that are transcendently faster than those that utilize the electromagnetic
field and speed of light it resorted to quantum entangled states that propagate
information faster than the speed of light. And with the rational ontology of
layered densities of matter (1st fieldmatter, 2nd fieldmatter etc) since normally the
electrons move in a computer with speeds up to the speed of light, to find matter that
moves faster than the speed of light we will resort to the micro-electrons (see
section 4) (about half of them according to the Maxwell probability distributions of
speeds of the particles in a gas, in the fieldmatter move faster than the speed of light
and also the “light wave” of the 2nd fieldmatter (which consists from nano-electrons )

12
moves faster than the visible light. Based on this technology and computing faster
that the light can be developed. But if we not really understand the simple physical
ontology of finer material densities of fieldmatter t5hat can move faster than light
then such a technology cannot be easily developed simply by the idea of quantum
entanglement.

WHAT IS THE FREQUENCY OF A LAYER OR DESNITY OF

MATERIALITY? DARK MATTER AND DARK ENERGY?

For the definition of the frequency of the material layer we will have to find the
frequency of their constituent particles. And e.g. here for the molecular matter and
for the electron we do not mean the Compton-De Broglie frequency of the electron
but we mean the actual average frequency of the spin of the electrons, protons
and neutrons. Thus we might be able to calculate the frequency of the molecular
matter which is the coarser layer and lower density matter but not yet the frequency
of the fieldmatter.
For example of we utilize the data of the classical electron, the frequency fr of
the spin of the electron is fr=s*5/(2*m*R^2) where s is the spin s=+,- ½ ĥ ,
(ĥ=h/2π) , R is the radius, and m its mass. While the Compton-de Broglie frequency
fc is fc= (m*c^2)/h.
To make an estimate of the frequency of the visible molecular material reality
we enter the data ĥ=h/2π=6.58 *10^(-25) GeV *sec , electron mass
me=0.10938356*10^(-31)kgr, and the classical radius of the electron
R=re=(1/4πε0)*(e^2)/me*c^2 , where c is the speed of light. So that
re=2.817940326727*10^(-13) cm, and s=5.264*10^(-44)joules*sec.

Putting these data in the formula of the frequency of the spin and making the
calculations it gives the result of about fr=1.81 Terra Hertz. Of course the data of
the classical electron are approximate and average only and so is this frequency of
the material reality. If we utilize the more common believed radius of the electron to
be of the order of 10^(-14)m then the frequency might be estimated lower and closer
to 1 terra-herz. Roughly speaking the frequency might be between 1 Terra Hertz
and 2 Terra Hertz. As the range of the infrared is between 430 Terra Hz -300 Giga
Hz, this frequency is in the range of the infrared.

13
 An increase of the frequency of the visible molecular material reality will
have the result of decrease of the radius of electrons, protons and neutrons due to
the conservation of the angular momentum. . If the increase in the frequency of the
elementary particles of an object is sufficient, this may result in to seemingly
invisibility of the material objects, and is might be the base of the idea of beam-
transportation of objects in the future technology.

A remark about the frequency of the electron spin calculated here between 1-2
terra Hertz These frequencies have wavelength which is between about 0.5 mm
while the dimension of the nitrogen atom is 56 pm, the mean free path in air is 68
nm , thus there is ultrasound in air with that frequency too!

What is this that in astronomy they call dark matter, dark energy? In view of
the previous rational ontology of matter in physics, dark matter is molecular
matter of different frequency than what we know on earth, and dark energy,
fieldmatter of different frequency that what we now on earth. It seems that in the
galaxy there are whole planets made from the 1st fieldmatter, and even of higher
frequencies types of fieldmatter, which somehow absorb and do not reflect the
usual light waves, and appear darker in astronomic observations.
The property of same frequency (of electron spin etc) of molecular matter
objects is crucial in coexisting, in the same coherent physical reality. If two say
pencils would have much different frequencies compared to the 1 terrarhertz, the one
with the higher frequency would almost liquidate and destroy the one with the low
frequency the moment they were some centimetres close. Our physical reality is a
small window of frequencies (of the spin of electrons, protons and neutrons) around
the 1 terrarherz. But it is this snall window of “almost the same frequency” property
that makes the Physical reality coherent and working as we know it (when you throw
pencil on the wall it will not go though it!) . That is why there are serious people who
advise the CERN to stop the super high energy collisions experiments. There is
always the danger of destroying locally this small window of “almost the same
frequency” of the matter, which will “open the door” for matter and existences from
unknown type of matter with frequency in-between the 1 terrahertz at infra-red of the
molecular matter and the (unknown yet) frequency of the 1st fieldmatter (spin
frequency of the micro-electrons) . This would be a kind of self destruction ofteh
physical reality, like opening a door deeply under the surface of the see, in sailing
ship.

14
 The next table compares the material layers of the fieldmatter and the molecular
matter and perceives them as whole different worlds of materiality with possible
liquid, and solid state matter in them. It may even be that there exist whole planets
made only from fieldmatter!

15
 Table 2: Material reality of at least 2 layers-frequencies.
1 frequency
st
Created Periodic Commo Common Organic
material by the System, n wave: materiality: living
reality or free- and Sound Solid objects, configuration
molecular permanen whole liquids, gases. s:
matter t triad planets planets Yes Known
(frequency= (proton, made Biology
the average neutron, from it:
frequency of electron) Yes.
the spin) (p+ , e- , Known
n0)

2nd frequency Created Periodic Commo Common Organic

material by the System n wave: materiality: living
reality or free- and Light Electromagneti configuration
fieldmatter permanen whole c, s: Yes
(frequency=t t triad of planets Gravitational Unknown e.g.
he average fieldmatte made of fields. Human
frequency of r particles it: Yes, Unknown if fieldmatter
the spin) (μp+,μe- Unknow there are also body.
,μn0) n yet. whole planets
made from it
with gaseous,
liquid and
solid states of
fieldmatter.

16
4) OPTIMAL PRINCIPLES OF BALANCE BETWEEN THEORY
AND PRACTICE (Section 2 of the book)
SUCH PRIMARY PRINCIPLES OF THE SCIENCE OF
PHYISCS ARE
1) THE SCIENCE OF PHYSICS AND ITS DERIVED
TECHNOLOGY SHOULD SERVE THE EVOLUTION NOT ONLY
OF THE MORTAL HUMAN PERSONALITY BUT ALSO OF THE
IMMORTAL SOUL CONSIOUSNESS.
(Quote from PLATO=”IT IS ONLY THE MIND THAT THROUGH
THE TRUE SCIENTFIC KNOWLEDGE LIBERATES THE SOUL”)
2) LAYERED ATOMIC STRUCTURE PRINCIPLE The
Material physical reality is structured in discrete orders of scale and
layers or densities or resolutions and each layer is made of some size
free and permanent material indivisibles. The denser the layer the smaller
the constituent particles..

THE OPTIMALITY PRINCIPLES OF THE PHYSICAL

SCIENCE

1) CLEAREST POSSIBLE PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY. HERE THE

ONLY PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY IS THAT OF MATTER AND LAYERS
OF ATOMIC STRUCTURED MATTTER PRINCIPLE.
2) SIMPLEST POSSIBLE MATHEMATICS AND THE MINIMUM
NEW KNOWN EQUATIONS FOR MODELS OF PHYSICAL
REALITY AND EXPERIMENTAL FACTS
3) AS FEW HYPOTHESIS AND AS SIMPLE AS POSSIBLE SO AS
TO EXPLAIN THE EXPERIMENTS
4) MAXIMUM UTILIZATION OF ALL KNOWN EXPERIMENTS
AND THEORIES
5) MAXIMUM POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS AND IMPLICATIONS
FROM EACH SINGLE EXPERIMENT

17
 6) MAXIMUM POSSIBLE DEDUCTIONS AND PREDICTIONS
OF OTHER PHYSICAL THEORIES AND FACTS.
7) MAXIMUM AND SIMPLEST POSSIBLE UNIFICATION OF
ALL THEORETICAL FRAGMENTS OF RELEVANT PHYSICAL
THEORIES BASED NOT SO MUCH IN MATHEMATICS BUT ON
CLEAR AND SIMPLE PHYSICAL ONTOLOGY (e.g. matter made
from atoms) .
8) MAXIMUM POSSILE RATIONALISM AND PLAUSIBILITY IN
PHYSICS AND AS FEW STRANGE AND MIND TRAPPING
HYPOTHESES AS POSSIBLE.
9) WE DO NOT APPLY WHAT EVER WE CAN DISCOVER BUT
WE DISCOVER WHATEVER WE CAN APPLY FOR THE
EVOLUTION OF THE HUMAN CICILIZATION AND THE
IMMORTAL SOUL CONSIOUSNESS
What this article is not: It does not suggest as proved, equations or
new perceptions that known and existing experimental facts do not
suggest. Nevertheless, we are free to make most probable plausible
speculations as long as we do not claim them proved experimentally and
thus certain. Furthermore, it does not give directly recipes for
technological inventions, but helps the inventors to shape a truer
perception of how the material reality and the classical fields function
which makes for the easier to discover new technology especially in the
era of renewable energy and transportations.
As we shall realize by the end of this article, the new
propositions and equations are inevitable consequences of the
experimental facts and stated principles.

18
5) THE PARADISE OF DEMOCRITUS OF THE 21ST CENTURY.
( THE PHYSICALLY RATHER THAN MATHEMATICALLY
UNIFIED CLASSICAL FIELD = ONE AND THE SAME 1ST
FIELDMATTER FLUID) OPEN AND DEAD-END ROADS FOR
THIS EVOLUTION. Sections 5,6 of the book

We discussed in the paragraph 1, the ancient Democritus paradise of the

qualitative world of molecular matter, which was essentially realized
quantitatively centuries later, after the laws of Newton , the work of L.
Boltzmann , chemistry , the periodic system of the atoms and the physics
and thermodynamics of fluids.
Now there is a corresponding Democritus 21st century paradise, at least in
a qualitative way at first, if we apply his principle of particle matter and
Newton’s law of momentum conservation, not to the molecular matter
(that it has been already applied) but to the (1st) fieldmatter in which it
has not really been applied.
We should expect a similar abundance and huge step in the technologies
of the civilization from this 2nd, 21st century Democritus paradise.
We should expect in this new paradise, practically
1) very cheap (almost cost-free) renewable energy from the fieldmatter
heat (mainly solar energy), (thus no CO2 pollution problem)
2) new fieldmatter propulsion (e.g, flying discs, as a kind of
“helicopters” of the fieldmatter , (not of the molecular matter),
3) ability to reduce almost to zero the inertial mass of bodies at rest or
moving,
4) Faster than light computing (quantum computing)
5) Maybe medicine, by neutral fieldmatter frequencies
etc
Of course we should not make the mistake that simple technological
evolution is also civilization’s evolution. It is not. It should be parallel
to inequalities reduction. Hundreds of studies of Universities but also of
19
the United Nations, prove that economic and sociological evolutions
increases speed, when the Gini-index that measures the inequalities is
reduced, and decreases speed, when the Gini-index is increased. This is
not strange, as in a society with high inequalities and no universal basic
income, a large part of talented people and evolved souls, are not really
utilized for the civilizations evolution but straggle to survive doing not
really significant jobs. It is the immortal soul aspect of the human beings
which is forgotten in a society with high inequalities. Of course a society
of low inequalities attracts, same evolution souls for incarnation. The
technology in a civilization is not always positive,it can be negative and
give rise to tyrannies. A rule of safety is that the technology must not
only serve the needs of the mortal human personality but also the
needs of evolution of the immortal souls.
The book and the state of knowledge of the author does not provide,
final and experimentally exact equations, in the fieldmatter that can
lead directly to all the above technological applications. This will take
decades of collective research in the universities. But the book (and this
article that summarizes it) provide the path for a better perception of
the physical reality, a path for the right physical intuition and
rational ontology of the physical matter, that can lead to this “paradise”
provided of course that such a technology is not used for tyranny by an
oligarchy, hidden or not, but by all people , in a society of reduced
inequalities and universal basic income. But let us be optimistic. Maybe
after 2050-2060 that east and west will have almost he same average
living standards, and that the population of earth will have pass its
maximum and has stabilized, (if a 3rd world war because of a battle of
hidden tyranny versus freedom, will stop the evolution) such a paradise
will start to realize.

20
Meanwhile for the present the road that seems open, is that of re-
writing our equations of the classical fields to become more true and
corrects, following the right intuition (as in the current presentation)
and at the same time providing simple University experiments that
support this new version of our equations. First we aim and ten we pull
the trigger not the other way around.
The other, road, of first discovering new practical and experimental
devices, and directly commercializing the technology , without at the
same time modifying in a valid way the known Universities theory and
equations, has been proved to fail and it is a dead-end road.
WE MUST NOT APPLY WHAT EVER WE CAN DISCOVER BUT
WE SHOULD DISCOVER ONLY WHAT CAN BE APPLY FOR THE
GOOD OF ALL.

21
6) THE EXPERIMENTAL AND THEORETICAL NEED FOR
NON-QUANTUM CORRECTIONS OF THE CLASSICAL FIELDS.
(TESLA ELECTROMAGNETISM ETC.) Section 8 of the book
The need to solve the CO2 problem of the planet requires these
modifications of the equations because of hundreds by now
experiments and devices.
Since the time of J. C. Maxwell and A. Einstein there are by now
plenty many experiments and inventions that require modification of the
equations. And the first such experiments where by N. Tesla relevant not
only to his “Magnifying Transmitter” which he considered one of his
major discoveries but also relevant to other devices by him. For an
account and qualitative explanations of them see the paragraph 15). A
good account of may such inventors of this particular type of renewable
energy which certainly is renewable due to the solar energy and which is
called in the internet “Free energy” may be found after the elaborate
and fair work of Allan Sterling (see {Sterling Allan 2021] and [Naudin
J]).
It will turn out as we shall see, that the classical Maxwell
equations of electromagnetism seem to require the hypothesis of an
inviscid and incompressible charged gaseous fieldmatter, while the N
Tesla’s inventions require effects of viscous and compressible charged
gaseous fieldmatter,
It seems that the N. Tesla method for this fieldmatter renewable
solar energy was by lightings and his towers, in large or small size
(phenomena related probably to his magnifying transmitter) .The same
with the similar work of E. Gray . On the other hand, the inventors J.
Searl. De Palma, P. Baumann (testatika, Switzerland ) , P.Tewari (India) ,
L Szabo EBM generator (Hungary) (see references) , have inventions are
relevant to rotating magnetic fields. It might be that N Tesla had also
discovered versions of the electric generator that could extract solar
energy from the gravitational field (see paragraph 15). N.. Tesla often
wrote that he had discovered the rotating magnetic field. Did he simply
mean that he had discovered that you could rotate a magnet? Not likely.
Most probably he meant that he had discovered that a rotating magnetic
field cannot be described adequately with the linear Maxwell equations.

22
Since we know now that the magnetic vector is the vector of the vorticity
of the changed fieldmatter, if you ask any expert in fluid dynamics he
will assure you that in general a rotating field of vorticities of a fluid
cannot be described adequately by the linearized equations of
acoustics as if of inviscid incompressible fluids with zero convective
accelerations. ( and the Maxwell equations are exactly that as we discuss
in paragraph 12) and on the contrary it requires the full non-linear
equations of Navier-Stokes, as we shall see in the next paragraph 9.
Therefore, it is not improbable that N Tesla also had discovered methods
of extracting of solar energy from the gravitational field based on
rotating magnetic fields and not only to his magnifying transmitter.
Another reason for the modification are also experiments and
observations in gravitation that do not conform with the Einstein’s
gravitation. A major example is also the discrepancy of Astronomy and
geology about the earth’s interior and gravitational mass, discussed in the
next paragraph 9.
Furthermore, the class of experiments in quantum mechanics called
non-locality and noticed after the EPR paradox is also a strong reason to
modify the axioms of special relativity although keep the equations the
same.
The next table show the correlation of technologies and theories and
the CO2 planetary problem.

23
Table 3
PHYSICAL THEORY DERIVED TECHNOLOGY

Special Relativity and Quantum Nuclear energy, Nuclear propulsion

Mechanics

Unified fieldmatter (electrogravity and Tesla’s free solar energy, Electromagnetic

linear inertia) propulsion, medicine through fieldmatter
sound frequencies

But except of experimental needs, there are also theoretical needs to

re-write the equations of the classical fields. we should remark that the
need to modify the mentioned equations is because also of the optimality
principles stated in the paragraph 2. As we know the Maxwell’s equations
are linear. While if we start with a gaseous filedmatter fluid from positive,
negative, and neutral particles (interacting by Coulombs force law, and
collisions) and state 3 different Newton;s force alw equations, we get
non-linear equations. Therefore somewhere we have linearsized
something to get the Maxwell;s equations, that we should not, which
makes us miss the most important energy and propuslion of electric
machines.
We mention here a case of remarkably simple and low technology
energy generator that subtracts heat from the electrified fieldmatter to
convert it to electric current. It is a modified version of the very old and
famous Wimshurts machine of the 18th century, which exists in every
museum of Schools of Electric engineering of Universities. This
modification is known as Testatika, and was discovered by P Baumann in
the decade of 1970 (see references [Baumann P. Testatika]). P. Baumann
in the 80’s and 90’s was living as monk in the Christian community of
Methernitha in Switzerland , and power with electricity the whole
monastery of hundreds of monks with a significant number of Testatika
generators. He died in 2000. The modifications of P. Baumann of the
Wimshurts machine consist in to putting in the one of the two discs
more metal radial plates compared to the other disc, (break its symmetry).
He was calling the disc with many radial plates “Heaven” and the second
with less “Earth”. As its know the two discs turn in opposite orientation,

24
as when we put two air-fans in opposite direction face to-face. The result
of course in air, will be that the two air-fans will create compression ofteh
air in between them and then outer direction expansion of it outside the
circular boundaries of them. This will make the air to lose heat (the
temperature will drop a bit) and part of this energy of the heat will be
converted to extra kinetic motion of the air. This is also what happens
with the Testatika, where the extra kinetic energy of the charged
fieldmatter, is collected as extra potential difference between the two
poles of brushes in collecting electron currents. This extra electric energy,
is more than the losses to keep the Testatika turning at about 30 rotations
per minute (sustained by a small motor which is powered again by
Testatika) , and the source of this renewable electric power. The diameter
of the disc of Testatica is about 70 cm, and the produced energy is about
1kw-hr. The electrons are collected by a kind spark-gap in the old
fashioned air-capacitors of high voltage, and then converted to low
volatge and more ampere. The temperature of the fieldmatter will drop a
bit, which will lead to as light drop of the temperature of the air. Which is
indeed observed. That is why this device is classified as “Cold
Electricity” among other similar such devices, of electromagnetism that
create a small drop of the temperature of the air environment. Of course
Tesla’s tour was also a case of “Cold Electricity”. Professor K.Meyl
(see references [Meyl Konstantin 2000]) has constructed miniatures of
the Tesla tour (magnifying transmitter), and verified that indeed it
produces some extra millivolts in the potential difference that extra small
percentage of energy. Sparks create of course very small almost invisible
tornadoes in the charged fieldmatter that extract heat to make it extra
electric field, and electric current. Below in figure 4 is a photo of the
Testatica. And in figure 5 a single-disc Wimshurts machine

25
Figure 4

Figure 5
Video showing a Wimshurtst machine in action.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zilvl9tS0Og&ab_channel=mittec
htv

NONE OF THE ABOVE CASES EITHER OF TESLA TOUR OR OF

TESTATIKA ARE EXPLAINABLE IN MAXWELL’S
ELECTROMAGNETISM. IN MAXWELL’S ELECTROMAGNETISM
SUCH EXTRA ENERGY IS IMPOSSIBLE.

26
We will mention one more, of the 100’s other electric devices not
explainable or existing in the Maxwell electromagnetism (from the time
of Tesla till today) , because it is relevant to electromagnetic
propulsion , and essentially it is an accidental discovery of rather clumsy
flying disc. (see references [Searl J effect])

Figure 6
J Searl experimented with his disc during 1940-1960. This drawing in
Figure 6 is by a text from the University of Sussex.
J. Searl (as with Testatika) was experimenting with rotating metal discs
so as to have centrifugal forces applied to its free electrons , and then
collect difference of voltage from the centre and peripheral areas of the
disc. In the figure we see in a horizontal section rings and cylindrical
magnets, instead of a simple metal disc. The device is symmetric. Still
when it is rotating fast it will obviously create also rotation in the charge
fieldmatter. In order to have the extra energy phenomenon, the rotation of
the fieldmatter has to be asymmetric as in a cone so as to have expansion
and temperature drop. The asymmetry is provided by the environment , as

27
the ground is closer to the device than the roof. So close to the ground the
fieldmatter rotates slower, and a small tornado in the electro-magnetised
fieldmatter is created after some time. This will make the temperature of
the fieldmatter to drop, and so it will be with the molecular air too. Thus
not only extra energy is provided on the rotating disc but also a
propulsion due to the fieldmatter tornado (momentum conservation
between the fieldmatter and the molecular matter of the disc) which
will lift it through the roof on the atmosphere, and let the disc fall some
kilometres away. The explosiveness of the phenomenon is similar to the
explosiveness of tornadoes (here nevertheless we are dealing with field
matter tornadoes) This is roughly speaking the explanation of the Searl
Generator effect. I consider it a lucky accidental discovery of rather
clumsy flying disc (fieldmatter helicopters) .
AGAIN NONE OF THE ABOVE EFFECTS ARE EXPLAINABLE IN
MAXWELL’S ELECTROMAGNETISM. IN MAXWELL’S
ELECTROMAGNETISM (incompressible , frictionless and with zero
convective acceleration fieldmatter as we shall see in paragraph 11)
SUCH EXTRA ENERGY OR PROPULSION IS IMPOSSIBLE.

7) SOME HISTORY OF RUMOURS. SOLVING THE GLOBAL

CO2 PROBLEM

In this paragraph I will deviate from the strict academic scientific facts,
and I will describe, some of my experiences in my carrier, which contain
of course personal beliefs about rumours without the claim to be imposed
or be accepted as facts proved beyond doubt by the mainstream concepts
of the mass media. Still all that I mentioned can be found in the internet.
As a pupil in high school I was a student with grades 18/20 , 19/20 and I
was 4th national wide when being accepted in the mathematical
department of the Kapodistrian University of Athens. I loved
mathematics , and I was always reading many books about many
advanced mathematical areas never taught in the University. I took by

28
bachelor with a grade about 8.x/10 and also I worked out a PhD in
geometry (2nd part of the 18nth Hilbert problem) after some years. When
with friends of mine we were participating as University students in
international conferences in physics, relativity or quantum mechanics, I
always had the feeling and thought in the back side of my head, that with
special relativity and that the speed of light is the same in all systems of
reference there was a misunderstanding from the side of A. Einstein, and
that his formulae of special relativity could be derived within the classical
Galilean relativity (see paragraph 12 below). But I was thinking that I do
not really have strong motive to put myself in to discovering this
misunderstanding, as I was not really a physicist but a mathematician. I
preferred at that time to let people believe that Einstein ‘s axioms of
special relativity were correct. Decades later, and after what a came to
realize was happening in humanity, I found the motive to put myself in to
it and reveal the misunderstanding.
In the decade of 90’s I was not working in the Universities and I was
more or less unemployed suffering from the lack of the universal survival
income as million of other people too. I watched a documentary film in a
reliable state channel of the national state TV, (ERT 3) in which by
photos and reports of the British intelligence service during the 2nd world
war, it was revealed that the Nazi in Germany under Hitler, had two super
weapons that of the atomic bomb and that of flying discs (or supersonic
helicopters as they called them). The technology of the flying discs was
not discovered by the Germans but was given to them in secrete
masonries (Vril and Thule ) by telepathy from an…..renegade alien who
came in earth as they claimed. When Germany was defeated they
destroyed the two only experimental flying discs that they had
manufactured. Surprised as I was by that , I bought a copy of the film and
I studied it. I was impressed by the idea that there was electromagnetism

29
which is not captured by the Maxwell’s equations, and that flying disc
could travel faster than the speed of light. Such facts were in agreement
with what I was discovering in my speculations in non-Einsteinian
gravitation and non-Einsteinian special relativity. At that time (1998) I
was noticed by the British Aerospace (for my attempt to publish a paper
in non-Einsteinian physics in conference held every two years in North
UK, for non-Einsteinian physics) and was invited in the University of
Lancaster in UK to lecture and explain the Aspden gyroscope effect
mentioned in the previous paragraph 6. My invitation by the British
Aerospace was financed by a project by them, which was asking
University professors to design flying vehicles that 1) utilize renewable
energy while flying and not fossil fuels 2) can go faster than the speed of
light.At exactly the same time an exact same projects was announce my
NASA, with a very small budget of 60 thousand dollars
It was obvious to me, (and to almost everyone) that such a project was
asking the academic world to explain with what physics might the flying
disc fly, The situation was strange to me, but I realized that there was a
need indeed to advance or correct our theoretical physics, which would
help much the defence of the planet against hostile aliens with flying
discs.
At that lecture in the University of Lancaster in autumn of 1998 , I gave
the general physical intuition (that the fieldmatter is a material fluid and
not empty space) about how to find equations that could derive the flying
discs to the audience, but I failed of course to give exact and correct
equations. I open a blog about it I wrote an article with this intuition of 70
pages, that year after year was enriched and corrected and after more than
20 years resulted to my current book about solving the global CO2
problem and this presentation. During this time I consolidated my
concept of gravitation due to the heat of the fieldmatter which I will

30
present in the paragraph 8,9 Till today I have no proof that I have
discovered any system of equations that with an exact experimental way
will lead to the manufacture of flying discs. But I know that the right
path of the intuition and perception of the ontology of the physical reality
and more correct non-linear equations that I suggest might lead after
some decades to this. Extraction of (solar) energy from the heat of the
fieldmatter (which would solve the global problem of CO2 ) is a by far
an easier task compared to flying discs, and I believe again that my book
shows the right path, so that one day in the future and before the end of
the century the Universities will achieve it.
As I said this book by me was triggered (but not really started) by the
invitation by the British Aerospace in 1998.
From 1998 till 2010 I was reading “off he record” and underground
rumours in the internet, that most of the inventors after N. Tesla who tried
and succeeded in inventing cold electricity renewable energy devices like
those in the previous paragraph, were suppressed, stopped and for-bitten
to make any monetization business from them. Therefore as I mentioned
in the paragraph The road, of first discovering new practical and
experimental devices, and directly commercializing the technology ,
without at the same time modifying in a valid way the known Universities
theory and equations, has been proved to fail and it is a dead-end road.
Still later in 2010, while trying to understand the “illusions” of the
famous David Copperfield, in his show business, I fell in the internet
upon someone under the name Alex Collier, that the American pentagon
had hired to lecture pentagon military officials with information about
earth and our sciences that was given to him (as a contactee) from an
alien civilization (from Andromeda) called “Blues”. The “blues” was one
of the 300 anti-tyrannical advanced civilizations of the galaxies
(Andromeda alliance) , by far more advanced compared to us not only in

31
technology but also in morality, degree of being saint , and spiritually. It
was hard to me to assimilate his information (especially about the interior
of the earth) and it took me more than 3 years to verify part of it by
reasoning in sciences or other sources of information. But his
informations confirmed all the previous information I had about flying
discs or aliens contacting earth. Recently (mainly 2021 and after) there is
an ex-agent of Nasa (and I think of the secrete services too) called Dr
Greer (easy to find in the internet) who is travelling and giving lectures
all over the planet, and verifies the existence of flying discs and also the
need to open this technology after more than 50 years, He explains that it
is reasonable that they had kept it secrete because there was the danger of
turning upside down huge networks of big companies in energy ,
transportation etc. But few give attention to him since the official policy
for 50 years was not to reveal anything about aliens and acquired flying
discs technology by them.
Personally I did not have and I do not seek financial profit from this
research, And I am not after goals of University carrier evolution
(actually I found work in a Economic School, seemingly irrelevant to
mathematical physics). I am also due to age, months away from
retirement. But I do believe that this direction of research will solve
the global CO2 problem.
I am optimistic though, that here is an open road ahead, and that part of
the secrete services are waiting the universities for this
For the present the road that seems open for a 21st century Democritus
paradise, is that of re-writing our equations of the classical fields to
become more true and corrects, following the right intuition (as in the
current presentation) and at the same time providing simple University
experiments that support this new version of the discovered equations.
First we aim and then we pull the trigger not the other way around.

32
The other, road, of first discovering new practical and experimental
devices, and directly commercializing the technology , without at the
same time modifying in a valid way the known Universities theory and
equations, has been proved to fail and it is a dead-end road.
WE MUST NOT APPLY WHAT EVER WE CAN DISCOVER BUT
WE SHOULD DISCOVER ONLY WHAT CAN BE APPLY FOR THE
GOOD OF ALL.

8) THE PHYSICAL MEANING OF THE POTENTIALS OF THE

CLASSICAL FIELDS. Section 7 of the book
Once we have realized that the classical fields like the
electromagnetic and gravitational are fieldmatter and not empty space, the
next step is to discover after Newton;s laws like momentum conservation
and energy conservation, the correct equations as we know them in
molecular fluid dynamics , except now applied to fieldmatter. This is the
paradise of Democritus (permanent and free) particle matter, except
applied not to the molecular matter but to the fieldmatter. We want also to
discover the physical meaning of the enigmatic potentials of Maxwell’s
electromagnetism and Newton’s gravitation. . We shall start with the
electromagnetic field which is more intriguing. In both cases the
discovery of the physical meaning of the electromagnetic and
gravitational potentials should be under the general optimality principles
stated in the paragraph 2.
A) The equations of the Maxwell’s electromagnetism
formulated in their simplest possible form on the potentials as they can
be found in any good University text book or e.g, in Wikipedia here
[Maxwell’s equations] after the Lorentz gauge condition (see again
Wikipedia here [Lorentz gauge condition]) are the next in the SI system
of units (we must know that the equations of Maxwell have different
constants in different systems of units).
�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 �
��2 + ��2 + ��2 − �2 ��2
=− �� /�� (eq1)

�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 �
�� 2 + �� 2 + ��2
− �2 ��2 =− �� � (eq2)

33
 ��
� =− − ∇� (eq 1.1)
��

� = ����� (eq 2.1)

The Lorentz gauge condition is the

� ��
∇� +
�� ��
=0 (eq 2.2)

The Lorentz force

� = �(� + � × �) (eq 2.3)
The α is the scalar potential and the A the vector magnetic potential.
The ρq is the molecular charge density the ε0 is the molecular vacuum
electric permittivity, while the j is the molecular current density and the
μ0 is the molecular vacuum magnetic permeability . The E and B are the
vectors of the electric field and magnetic field respectively and have
physical dimension units [E]=[m][s][t]-2[q]-1=[force density]/[charge
density] (because [Force]=[m][s][t]-2) and [B]=[m][t]-1[q]-1 =[axial
density of rotatory around it, momentum density ]/[charge density]
(because [momentum]=[m] [s] [t]-1) where m is for mass, s for length, t
for time and q for charge. A direct calculation from the (eq 1.1), (eq 2.1)
of the physical dimensions of the potentials A and α give, [A]=[m][s][t]-
1
[q]-1 =[momentum density]/[charge density] and [α]=[m][s]2[t]-1[q]-1
= [pressure]/[charge density] (because [pressure]=[m][s]-1[t]-2) .
At a first look these equations look exactly like forced acoustics
waves with the D’Alembert hyperbolic linear non-homogeneous wave
equation. The homogeneous version of the acoustic equations are the
�2 �0 �2 �0 �2 �0 1 �2 �0
��2
+
��2
+
��2
− �2 ��2
=0 (eq3)

�2 �0 �2 �0 �2 �0 1 �2 �0
��2
+
��2
+
��2
−
�2 ��2
=0 (eq4)

Where p0 is the pressure of the air and the u0 is the velocity of the
air. (See references [Acoustic_wave_equation], [Wave_equation] ) It is
important to realize that he acoustics equations in an incompressible fluid
like water are based on 5 linearization hypotheses (which we will state for
simplicity in one spatial dimension only)

34
 1) Incompressible fluid and linearized state equation. and state
equation linearisation that the ambient density ρ0 is constant and in
general ρ=ρ0 (1+s), with small infinitesimal s changes, and similarly for
the pressure p=p0 +ps, . Staring from the state equation PV=nRT (see in
references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) we linearize it for the pressure p
and density ρ to p-p0=B(ρ-ρ0)/ρ0 , (eq 4.1)
where the p0 and ρ0 are the constant ambient pressures and densities
and B the adiabatic bulk modulus of the fluid which has physical units
dimensions of pressure.
2) Linearized continuity equations (mass conservation) (see again
�� ��
in references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) ��
+
��
=0 . (eq 4.2)
Where u is the velocity. From these 1), and 2) we easily derive the
equation
�� ��
��
+(1/�) ��
=0 (eq 4.3)
3) Inviscid fluid (no friction)
4) Zero convective acceleration and linearized Newtons force
(density) equation (Navier-Stokes equations). In other words, the
spatial partial derivatives of velocities are small compared to the
velocities
(� ∗ ∇� = �). (eq 4.4)
The non-linear Newton’s force equation is of the type
��
��
=− ∇� + ������� + �������� ������ ������� (eq 4.5)
��
Where is the material (moving with the fluid) velocity , and p the
��
pressure.
(see in the references [acoustic_wave_equation] and
[acoustic_wave_equation] and also in section 9 equation 11 ). The
linearised force equation in one dimension is
�� ��
ρ0 + =0 (eq 4.6)
�� ��
See [Acoustic_wave_equation] for this triple linearisation and
derivation of the D’ Alembert wave equations (eq 3) (eq 4). In
section 11 we shall discuss in detail how, with only the so far Democritus
principle of particle structure of the fieldmatter, the Newtons law of

35
momentum conservation and a minimal assumption of Coulob’s type
forces between charged particles either in molecular mater, or
fieldmatter, we may derive with the above acoustic linearization of the
full equations of a compressible fluid, the Maxwell equations . Here we
just mentioned it for heuristic reasons. We must not forget though that
this is only an approximation and that the true waves are non-linear, and
this is why the sound in molecular air and light in the fieldmatter, at
small scale create particle-like behavior so as to talk about particle
“sononia” and photons.

Based on this
1) We interpret the vector magnetic potential A as the
momentum density ρm �± - divided by the charge density ρq of the
fieldmatter
A= f2 (ρm�± )/ρq (eq5)
2) We interpret the scalar electric α potential as the pressure
�± the charged fieldmatter divided by the charge density ρq of the
fieldmatter
α= f1 �± /ρq (eq6)
with f1 , f2 dimensionless constants to fit the units of measurements.
Of course these interpretations are based on that as molecular matter
has charge indivisibles (electrons etc.) so also with the fieldmatter
(micro-electrons etc.) as we have already mentioned in section 4.
Now the Maxwell equations (eq 1) (eq 2) have a natural
interpretation as forced waves in the charged fieldmatter from molecular
charges like electrons that due to their spin create forced waves or due to
additional velocity too (electric current density). From this we are one
only step away for the correct non-linear charged fieldmatter equations of
the electromagnetism, that will be discussed in section 9, and will be of
the general form (starting with the general form of equation 4.5)

36
 (Newton’s law of Force (density) in the fieldmatter fluid ( density,
velocity pressure, fieldmatter charge density, fieldmatter current density
etc)) =
=(external forces (density) my molecular matter( molecular
charge density, molecular current density etc.) )/
If we do not like the classical fluid dynamics approach but prefer the
statistical mechanics approach (as by Boltzmann) then the next
hypotheses could be utilized to derive the equations of the correct non-
linear Electromagnetism.
1) The particles of the electomagnetized or charged fieldmatter
consist from mainly positive (micro-protons) or mainly negative
(micro-electrons) fieldmatter particles, that interact between them
with collisions but mainly essentially by Coulomb’s law forces.
2) These charged particles make an ordinary gaseous fluid, with
all the necessary laws and equations of gaseous fluids, somehow
similar to ionized gases of the molecular matter.
Someone might remark with disappointment, that he was expecting
that the charge forces of coulomb might also me explainable, with the
Democritus principle of particle fieldmatter, and Newton’s law of
momentum conservation. Well not yet in such a low frequency
fieldmatter fluid. Maybe in much higher frequency fieldmatter fluids if
they exist (7th or 8th etc) . But by noticing that the charge is only of two
types, positive and negative we may suspect that it is related with
geometric motion inside the electrons (and micro-electrons) of the two
possible orientations in 3 dimensional space , right-hand rule and left-
hand rule. E.g. a non-rigid surface motion on a torus, which
simultaneously rotate around the axis of symmetry of the torus and also
upward or downwards, would give such two types of (vortex) motions.
B) To discover the meaning and role of the Newtonian scalar
gravitational potential requires a little more ingenuity and inspiration.
When the students of physics in the Universities are taught about the
Newtonian gravitation they teach them that the basic equation of
Newton written on the scalar Newtonian gravitational potential is the
Poisson equation. And when they are taught thermodynamics of

37
molecular material fluids or air they are also teach them that the flow of
the heat around a heat source is also described by the Poisson
Equation. Of course they do not teach them, the why of this coincidence.
(see references [Poisson equation] ) When I. Newton was asked why his
inverse square law of universal attraction holds, he answered that we only
know that it is so and we do not know the why. Here in this article we
will discover in the first time in the history of physics why the inverse
square law of Newtonian universal attraction holds. Once we have
realized that the Newtonian gravitation takes place in the fieldmatter and
not in empty space , it is natural to consider the flow of heat around a heat
source in the field matter (not in the molecular matter). See references
[Heat equation]
For non-uniform isotropic mediums
��
���
��
− ∇ �∇� = �� (eq7)

�� =volumetric heat source or rate in time and space density of heat

energy flow, ρ is the mass density and cp is the specific heat capacity and
k is the thermal conductivity.

In case of non-time varying temperature and non-time varying flow

of heat and of constant thermal conductivity the equation becomes the
Poisson equation (in 1 dimension a version of it is called the Fourier law
of heat and temperature) .

��� � =− �� (eq8)

Which directly compares with the Newtonian gravitational Poisson

equation

�� � =− ���� (eq9)

Where φ is the scalar Newtonian gravitational potential , ρ is the

mass density and G is the Newtonian gravitational constant.
We may test the mechanism of attraction on the light as well. The
Poison equation (eq8) of the heat propagation creates an attraction to the
sound waves, as the sound wave has speed equal to about the average

38
speed of the particles of air and this average speed of the particles is
directly proportional to the temperature. The sound waves paths are bent
by areas of higher air temperature or heat sources in air and
experience acceleration towards these heat sources. This would be in
more detailed derived from a more true non-linear waves of the sound.
Similarly, for the fieldmatter: Higher temperature due to heat will create
higher speed to both the neutral fieldmatter waves (fieldmatter sound or
neutral light as we shall see in paragraph 10) and on the charged
fieldmatter waves or light waves. Thus the photons will accelerate
towards the fieldmatter source of heat which in the equation 9 are only
due to the quantity of matter and the heat of fieldmatter created by
friction of the spin of electrons, protons, neutrons. And this is essentially
the effect of the gravitation. In the paragraph 11 we shall see why besides
the photons, also the electrons , proton and neutrons too accelerate.
After the above enlightening we discover that the field
Temperature T is directly proportional with some constant with the
Newtonian scalar gravitational potential φ
� = �� � (eq 10)
Where α0 is a constant with appropriate units dimensions to convert
the units of the Newtonian scalar potential to the temperature units of the
fieldmatter . The physical dimension units of the φ are [φ]=[s]2 [t]-2 and
of the temperature [T]=[k] (k=units of temperature), thus [�0 ]=[s]-2 [t]2 [k]

9) THE TRUE NON-LINEAR LAWS AND EQUATIONS OF THE

CLASSICAL FIELDS. Section 9 of the book.
The author stresses in advance that the main merit of this book is not
the exact mathematical form of the unified phenomena of the
fieldmatter fluid (which may have different constants in different
systems of units and in some cases different mathematical equations
according to the degree of approximation we require) but the clearer
physical ontology of the fieldmatter as material fluid from positive ,
negative and neutral permanent and free particles interacting with

39
Coulomb laws. From this and the Newton’s law of force or momentum
conservation we can unify, gravitation, electromagnetism and relativistic)
inertia with more true non-Maxwell and non-Einstein gravitation
equations. Although some of the equations presented here may change
after experimentation, the main thought-form of the fieldmatter as a
finer particles fluid will still be true. Once we have discovered the
correct physical interpretation of the potentials of electromagnetism and
Newtonian gravitation, the very physical nature of their phenomena
makes obligatory to us to state the well-known equations that they
govern them.

It is enough for the author for the reader to realize the for the fieldmatter
its fluid dynamic phenomena are derived with Netwon’s law of
momentum conservation or force law, in the form of momentum density
and field density plus some force law of intearction of the positive and
negative particles of the fieldmatter. E.g.
(Newton’s law of Force (density) in the fieldmatter fluid (density,
velocity pressure, etc)) =
=(external forces (density) my molecular matter(molecular
density, molecular momentum density etc.) (eq10.1)
As it is known the main equations of the fluids is that of the Navier-
Stokes equations which are stated essential as the momentum
conservation of Newton. Here is the structure of the Navier-Stokes
equations (See references [Navier-Stokes equation] )
��
�
��
=− ∇� + ������� + �������� ������ ������� (eq 4.5)

(eq11)

For a compressible gaseous fluid as the fieldmatter a quite general

form is the next

40
 �� ��
�
��
=�
��
+ � ∗ ∇� =− ∇� + ∇� + ��� + �� (�� ) (eq12)

Where ρ is the mass density, u is the flow velocity, ∇ ⋅ is

the divergence, p is the pressure, t is time,τ is the deviatoric stress tensor
due to viscosity , which has order 2, fm is external density of force due to
the presence of molecular matter and
ffm is external density of force due to the deeper fieldmatter itself but not
due to contact with molecular matter. We may set it here=0 for simplicity
in the case of neutral fieldmatter.
If we want to derive the true non-linear equations of
Electromagnetism we must write the Newton’s law of force for the 3
different sub-fluids , of positive (+), negative (-) and neutral (ο) particles
Then the above Navier-Stokes equations will become
��+
�+
��
+ �+ ∗ ∇�+ =− ∇�+ + ∇�+ + �+ (eq13)

Or in more detail
� �+
�+ + �+ ∗ ∇ �+ =− ∇�+ + ∇�+ + �+ + �+ �� , �, �
��

(eq14)
� �−
�− + �− ∗ ∇ �− =− ∇�− + ∇�− + �− + �− �� , �, �
��

(eq14.1)
� ��
�0 + �� ∗ ∇ �� =− ∇�0 + ∇�� + �� + �� �� , �, �
��

(eq14.2)

Where �� is the average spin frequency the molecular matter, r is

the molecular matter charge density, j is the current density of the
molecular matter. We will discuss later why we assume such
dependencies of the external force densities terms from the molecular
matter. And also the �� is the force densities that the rest of the deeper
layers of fieldmatter exerts on the charged partial sub-gass of the

41
fieldmatter mainly due to the interaction of positive and negative
fieldmatter charge, and we describe it by the equations. We might set
�� = � for simplicity in neutral fieldmatter. We consider here the
electric forces of the micro-protons, micro-electrons of the charged
fieldmatter which as coulomb forces are by far stronger than the
collision forces of the micro-neutrons. We choose to formulate the
equations for 3 different partial sub-gasses of micro-neutrons,
micro-electrons micro-neutrons and micro-protons) .
We call the equations eq14, eq 14.1 eq 14.2 the true non-linear
dynamic electromagnetism. Even the Lorenz force formula (see
equation 2.3 ins section 7 and in references [Lorenz force]) requires
correction as the intensity of the interaction of the molecular mater
charges (e.g. electrons) with the electromagnetic field (charged
fieldmatter) depend in the frequency of the spin of the electrons
(frequency of the molecular matter)
For the case of neutral total fieldmatter (when it is not charged or
electromagnetised) we state the same equation but for the neutral
densities, pressures and velocities , that we denote with an index 0 (we do
not divide with fieldmatter charge density as it is zero) .
���
�
��
+ �� ∗ ∇�� =− ∇�0 + ∇� + �� (�� , �� , �� ) (eq15)

Again �� is the spin frequency the molecular matter, r0 is the

mass density, j0 is the ,momentum density of the neutral molecular
matter. Here there is no partial sub-gas escribed so no corresponding
force density term from the fieldmatter itself.

When ∇� = � in other words there is no friction then we have the

Euler equations of the same gaseous fluid.
We call the equations eq15 true non-linear fluid dynamics of
neutral fieldmatter or weak inertial interactions or antigravity.
An important remark about the convenience of the current equations
in experimental measurements: The equations 14, 15 are not convenient
for experimental measurements in the same way that the equations of
Maxwell written over the potentials are not convenient for experimental

42
measurements. But they are convenient for us here to capture in
abstract mathematical terms the ontology of the relevant physical
phenomena as far as the classical mathematical calculus, that utilizes
the infinite, allows (see also in references [Conway J. H], [Kyritsis K.
2022]).
If we do not like the classical fluid dynamics approach but prefer the
statistical mechanics approach (as by Boltzmann) then the next
hypotheses could be utilized to derive the equations of the correct non-
linear Electromagnetism.
AXIOMS FOR THE CORRECT ELECTROMAGNETISM
1) COULOMB-LORENTZ FORCES OF INTERACTION OF
CHARGED STANDING OR MOVING PARTICLES. The particles
of the electomagnetized or charged fieldmatter as a (gaseous) fluid
consist from mainly positive (micro-protons) or mainly negative
(micro-electrons) fieldmatter particles, that interact between them
with collisions but mainly essentially by Coulomb’s law forces.
2) FLUID DYNAMICS CONTEXT OF
ELECTROMAGNETISM. These charged particles OF
FIELDMATTER make an ordinary GASEOUS FLUID , with all the
necessary laws and equations of gaseous fluids, somehow similar to
ionized gases of the molecular matter.
We assume furthermore conservation of mass and charge in
fieldmatter as well besides the molecular matter.
Continuity equations of field-mass conservation and field-charge
conservation.
We remind the reader that in the classical electromagnetism we have
the postulate of molecular charge conservation which is sated as
∂q
∂t
+∇∗�=0 (eq21)

Where q=molecular charge density , j=current density

Similarly we may postulate the field-charge conservation
���±
∇ ∗ ���± + =0 (eq22)
��

43
 Where ���± is the density of the fieldmatter current and ��± is
the fieldmatter charge density positive or negative (separately).
Furthermore, we may postulate the fieldmatter mass conservation
which is the next equation
∂�0
+ ∇ ∗ (�0 �� ) = 0 (eq24)
∂t

GENERAL FIELDMATTER HEAT-TEMPERATURE

EQUATION AND DYNAMIC GRAVITATION.
We remind the reader that the physical units, dimensions of heat are
simply that of energy.
We proceed with the new dynamic gravitation equations since we
have now the physical interpretation in the fluid gas of the fieldmatter
from the scalar Newtonian potential
Once we have realized that the Newtonian gravitation takes place in
the fieldmatter and not in empty space , it is natural to consider the flow
of heat around a heat source in the field matter (not in the molecular
matter). See references [Heat equation]
For non-uniform isotropic mediums
��
��� − ∇ �∇� = �� (eq7)
��

�� =volumetric heat source or rate in time and space density of heat

energy flow, ρ is the mass density and cp is the specific heat capacity and
k is the thermal conductivity.
Utilizing the
T = �0 � (eq10)

We get the general dynamic gravitation equation.

��0 �
�0 ��
��
− ∇ �∇�0 � = �� (eq25)

44
 �� =volumetric heat source or rate in time and space density of heat
energy flow in the fieldmatter, ρ0 is the mass density of the fieldmatter ,
cp is the specific heat capacity and k is the thermal conductivity of the
fieldmatter, while φ is the scalar Newtonian gravitational potential.
Of course the derivation of the gravitation acceleration g from the
scaler gravitational potential φ still holds.

� = −∇ � (eq26)

In classical Newtonian gravitostatics when a body is at the

gravitational field and accelerates the narrative is that its energy is
converted from potential due to position to kinetic. In the present more
meaningful gravitation , a whole world of more intricate mechanisms of
exchange of energy is revealed.
When a body like a meteorite is attracted from the gravitational field
of earth and acquires kinetic energy falling on earth which is converted
to thermal energy, this energy is indeed subtracted from the gravitational
field of earth as heat of the fieldmatter
which nevertheless is renewed from solar energy stored in the
gravitational field.
The reason why not only the photon will accelerate toward heat
source of higher fieldmatter temperature but also a particle like an
electron, proton and neutron is the postulated linear coupling
equation 35.4 section 12 , and as the coupled wave in the neutral
fieldmatter will accelerate towards the higher fieldmatter
temperature so it will force by the coupling the molecular matter
particle to accelerate as well and perceived as gravitation.
Similarly, with the magnetic field of a magnet. In classical Maxwells
electromagnetism when a metal ball is in the magnetic field of permanent
magnet and accelerates the narrative is that its energy is converted from
potential due to position to kinetic. In the present more meaningful
electrogravity , a whole world of more intricate mechanisms of exchange
of energy is revealed.
45
 When a small ball of iron is attracted from a magnet
and acquires kinetic energy falling on the magnet (which is converted
to thermal energy), this energy is indeed subtracted from the energy of the
fieldmatter which is essentially the rotatory energy of the charged
fieldmatter (see equation 34.2, 34.4 in section 11) which nevertheless is
renewed by the energy from he circulating electrons of the permanent
magnet which in its turn can be renewed by the energy of
the gravitational field as fieldmatter heat inside it
The relation of the heat source of the fieldmatter with the presence
of a quantity of molecular matter its average spin frequency and solar
radiation is as follows (after eq. 8,9 in section 9 )

�� = �1 (�� )4πG�� + �� (eq27)

Where �1 is new constant depending on the average spin frequency

ωm of the molecular matter, G is the gravitational constant �� is the
mass density of the molecular matter, and �� is a volumetric heat source
in the fieldmatter due to solar radiation . For earth the �1 G is about 70%
of the G. In other words about 70% only of the earth gravitation is due to
the quantity of matter.

When the heat source and the temperature in the fieldmatter is

not time-varying , the thermal conductivity of the fieldmater is
constant and in the absence of solar radiation we postulate that the
new constants α0 α1 and the role of the solar radiation on the
matter is such that we get the classical Poisson equation of Newtonian
gravitation.

∇2 � =− 4���� (eq 9)

The classical static gravitation or gravitostatics of Newton

equation holds only when

1) The temperature of the fieldmatter is not time-varying

2) The first source of heat in the fieldmatter is due to the
presence of quantity of molecular matter and the spin

46
 frequency of the molecular matter is both uniformly
distributed in space and not time varying.
3) The solar radiation at molecular matter and fieldmatter
(the electromagnetic waves in reality are not adiabatic and
do have friction) becomes a 2nd volumetric source of heat
of the field matter, that for example for earth, the relevant
constants of the above equations would give about 30% of
the gravitation of earth (as we shall discuss and compute in
a dialogue below).

We notice how much simpler and familiar and rich in physical

meaning is the present general dynamic gravitation equations compared
to the formalism of the general relativity and gravitation of Einstein, plus
how much easier would be to apply solutions of all these well-known and
abundantly solved systems of equations.

IMPORTANT PREDICTION ABOUT THE REST INERTIAL

MASS OF BODIES: If we manipulate the heat source in the
fieldmatter due to the quantity of molecular matter so that the
gravitation is almost zero them the gravitational mass is almost zero
thus the inertial mass is almost zero too. This manipulation must
involve the spin of the elementary molecular matter particles. THE
MAIN SOURCE OF GRAVITATIONAL MASS THUS OF INERTIAL
MASS TOO IS THE FREQUENCY OF THE SPIN OF THE MAIN
TRIAD OF PARTICLES (p+ e- n0) OF THE MOLECULAR MATTER
and the heat source they create in the fieldmatter.

THE ROLE OF SOLAR RADIATION for the gravitation of earth

The solar radiation at the infrared and in particular between 1-2
terrahertz tunes with the average spin frequency of the molecular matter
particles like electron, proton, and neutron (that we have calculated as
having frequency between 1-2 terrahertz) and sustain their spin which
47
creates by friction the heat source in the fieldmatter for the gravitation.
This makes of course the potential gravitational energy essentially
renewable energy. IN PARTICULAR ABOUT 30% OF T HE EARTHS
GRAVITATION IS DUE TO THIS SOLAR ENERGY AS WE SHALL
DISCUSS IN A DIALOGUE BELOW. .
We proceed with new simple but revealing equations about
gravitation, speed of light and electromagnetism.
And therefore exactly as with the speed c of sound in air, where its
speed is proportional (almost equal) to the average speed of the particles
of air, therefore depending on the temperature in air
(see [Speed_of_sound] ) , so is with fieldmatter too .
���
������ =
�
(eq28)

where

 cideal is the speed of sound in an ideal gas;

 k is the ��������� ��������;
 γ (gamma) is the adiabatic index.
 T is the absolute temperature;
 m is the mass of a single molecule.

And thus we may state an equation of dependence of the square

of the speed of light, on the scalar gravitational potential φ in the case
that the fieldmatter behaves as an ideal gas with an appropriate new
constant.
New Gravitational equation dependence of the square of the
speed of light, on the scalar gravitational potential φ
�2 = �2 � (eq29)
This is part of the effect of the gravitational field on the photons.
If someone is think that this contradicts the general relativity, I
should remind to him, that in general relativity constancy of the speed of
light is postulated only at the local tangent spaces, where the special

48
relativity holds not though out the 4-D space-time manifold. Actually in
[Weyl Hermann 1952], it is mentioned that the automorphisms
(symmetries) of the 4D space-time manifold when traced to the tangent
spaces of special relativity are the similarities rather than the isometries.
In books like that here [Misner C.W.,Thorn K.S Wheeler J.A.], it set in
an adhoc way that the unit of measurement of space at each tangent space
is such that the speed of light in numerical value does not change
throughout the manifold. But this is artificial, it is not the natural (units of
space inherited by the charts of the manifold) and there is no
experimental base of it. To have an experimental base of such an extra
axiom of general relativity, requires defining how large is a tangent space
of the 4D manifold of general relativity? Would include one only solar
system? Many solar systems? And then make experiments with
measurement of the speed of light. Saying that a photon approaching
directly at the centre of a black-hole and ready to be absorbed by it is not
accelerated (rather improbable) , but that the space-time is distorted might
be equivalent to a Galilean-Newtonian inertial system that the photon is
accelerated. And the equations stated here are in Galilean-Newtonian
inertial systems of reference, with Galilean relativity.
We know of course the equation that relates temperature, density and
pressure in an ideal gas
�� = ��� or � = �3 �� (eq30)

Where p is the pressure, ρ the density , α3 an appropriate constant

and T is the absolute temperature in an ideal gas. This therefore gives still
a new gravitational equation

New Gravitational equation relating scalar gravitational

potential with fieldmatter density and pressure in the case that the
fieldmatter behaves as an ideal gass.
�0 = �3 �0 �0 � (eq31)

49
 Where p0 is the pressure of the neutral fieldmatter, ρ0 the density of
the neutral fieldmatter, α3 an appropriate constant, �0 is the constant of
equation (10) and φ is the scalar Newtonian potential
The classical behavior of the electromagnetic field is described
by Maxwell's equations, which predict that the speed c with which
electromagnetic waves (such as light) propagate in vacuum is related to
the distributed capacitance and inductance of vacuum, otherwise
respectively known as the electric constant ε0 and the magnetic
constant μ0, by the equation (See references:[Speed_of_light])
1
�2 = (eq32)
�0 �0
This gives a new equation by utilizing (eq29) too

New Gravitational equation (Dependence of classical

electromagnetic constants on the gravitation scalar potential)
1
�0 �0 = � (eq33)
2�

We point out that the unification of gravitation,

electromagnetism and inertia is not a kind of formal formulae that
unify symbolically the existing equations of the other 3 interactions,
but a meaningful unification based on that they are phenomena of
the same material fluid (fieldmatter) with particle physical ontology
of matter.
The next table compares 3 theories of gravitation
Table 4
THEORY NEWTONIAN EINSTEINS FIELDMATTER
UNIVERSAL GRAVITATION HEAT
ATTARCTION GRAVITATION
KEY SOURCE QUANTITY OF MASS-ENERGY HEAT OF THE
OF MOLECULAR FIELD MATTER
GRAVITATION MATTER

What was the main experimental verifications of Einstein’s

gravitation? We may mention 3 major

50
 1) The anomalies of Mercury perihelion, that gave observations of
higher gravitation on the mercury that that predicted by the Newtonian
gravitostatics. The problem of the anomalous precession of Mercury's
perihelion appeared in 1859 when the French astronomer Le
Verrier observed that the perihelion of the planet Mercury precesses at a
slightly faster rate than the one that can be accounted by Newtonian
mechanics with the distribution of masses of the solar system
There is a very simple qualitative explanation of it full of physical
meaning and familiar physics compared to the entirely formal
verifications by Einstein’s gravitation.
Since the sun is also rotating with an average spin period of 28 days
the fieldmatter around the sun is not static thus the gravitostastics of
Newton are not entirely appropriate. The rotation of the fieldmatter
occurs because of the rotation of the sun (rotation of fielfmater induced
by e.g, approximately the equation 35.4 of section 12 above or more
exactly by equations 14, 14.1, 14.2 and the force density term due to
molecular matter.) This will create a Bernoulli fluid dynamics effect,
and the closest planet which is the Mercury will experience an additional
fieldmatter pressure towards the sun. This is not purely gravitational
force and includes weak inertial forces derived from the equations 14.1,
14.2 or 35.4 of section 12..
Notice also the difference of molecular matter solar wind and
fieldmatter solar wind.
2) A second experimental verification of Einstein’s gravitation was the
bending of light Bending of light is obviously predicted with this unified
theory too and actually with a way far more enlightening and detailed
mechanism way.
3) Qualitative explanation of the gravitational redshift of light going
out of gravitational well
The gravitational well in the current unified theory is essentially like
that of sound going out of a temperature well in air that will decrease its
speed and thus have lower energy and impact momentum , except now its

51
not in air but in the fieldmatter and the redshift will be on the light and
not the sound.
Thus the historically main experimental verifications of general
relativity hold also for the current unified theory at least here
qualitatively. But the current theory predicts more than what the general
relativity does predict (e.g. double slit electron experiment, N. Tesla solar
energy, compatibility with astronomic hollow earth, existence of
fieldmatter sound waves or weak neutral light, motions faster than light,
etc)
In the light of the above analysis of universal attraction
“gravitational waves” could be
1) Temperature waves of the fieldmatter.
2) Fluctuations of the conductivity constant k of the field-gas
(fieldmatter),
3) Fluctuations of the gravitational constant G due to
fluctuations in the spin frequency oscillations that may lead
to time varying rates if heat flow in the fieldmatter from
the quantities of molecular matter.
4) Fluctuations of the solar radiation that may lead to time
varying rates if heat flow in the fieldmatter from the
quantities of molecular matter.
All the above waves would have been classified in the old
gravitation theory of Einstein as “gravitational waves”

THE PARADOX OF ASTRONOMY-GEOLOGY

INCOSISTENCY AND DISCREPANCY ABOUT EARTH IS
RESOLVED:
We state this paradox and its resolution as a dialogue of a Top
Astronomer, Top Geologist and the author
Top Astronomer: I hope that you know dear geologist that my
astronomy does not support your claim that earth is full of magma.
Top Geologist: And why astronomy does not support it?

52
 Top Astronomer: Do you agree with the astronomic assumption of
the origin of planets as solar nebula firry plasma balls?
Top Geologist: Yes we believe it is true.
Top Astronomer: Alright then, here are the stages of cooling of the
plasma ball with all the simulated calculations of material states from the
laws of physics.
1) First stage all the ball is gaseous plasma b) 2nd stage the spherical
surface till some depth is cooling to molecular matter magma c) 3rd stage
the spherical surface is cooling to solid state molecular matter till some
depth. This so because gaseous plasma state is not good conductor of heat,
so before all the ball is cooling to magma, first a spherical shell will be
cooling to solid state. Furthermore because of the rotation of the ball the
tangential surface tensions are maximum at the rotational poles thus there
are expected some solid-state holes say of 70 kilometers diameter. d) 4th
stage because of the holes and because the plasma matter continuous to
cool to magma from inside , the plasma state ball reduces its diameter
much less to the diameter of the solid-state spherical shell, so eventually
the spherical shell is cooling to solid-state matter from inside too e) 5th
final stage a solid spherical shells crated at about 1/3 of the radius while
the plasma ball is reduced at a very small ball at the center which may be
called inner sun of the planet earth. The rest of the inner space is full of
atmospheric air as the outer atmospheric air.
Top Geologist: Hmmm, I see your calculations they are correct! It
should be like this indeed and not full of magma. Actually you predict
magma only till about 1250 kilometers deep and I assure you that
experimental geology through the volcanos has not real proof that magna
exist in more depth. We only assume that magma will be till the center.
BUT I have 2 major objections …from astronomy that make your
predictions fall apart. 1) If there are 70 km diameter holes at the poles
how is it that the ocean e.g. at the north pole does not fall inside the
hollow earth? 2) If the solid spherical shell is about 1/3 of the radius then
the inertial and gravitational mass of earth would be much less. In

53
particular, the total quantity of molecular matter is the next proportion of
the quantity of a full sphere matter
((4/3*pi*3^3)-(4/3*pi*2^3))/(4/3*pi*3^3)=1-(2/3)^3=0.7125. Thus
a hollow earth has about only 70% mass compared to a full of magma
earth! And Newtonian gravitation has indeed measured as mass of earth
that of a full earth not 70% only of a hollow earth.
Top Astronomer: I admit that you have put me in a difficult
position at the corner as Galileo also was put when they objected to him
that how is it possible that a spherical earth hovers in space and does
not …..fall down, or the night that earth turns around we do not …..fall
in the sky?
The author : Let me dear astronomer give a resolving answer to the
Geologist based on our new and deeper theory of gravitation of the
present article. As I mentioned above the true source of gravitation is the
heat of the fieldmatter rather than the quantity of molecular matter which
created heat in the fieldmatter. Now it is known in meteorology that the
molecular air temperature follows the n-spherical harmonics and reverses
gradient many times as we go from the earth surface to the end of the
atmosphere. It is highly probably that the same reversing of gradient
occurs to the fieldmatter temperature which is the source of gravitation,
thus it may very well be that the gravitation from the inside solid surface
of the spherical shell is outward instead of towards the center of earth.
Thus if there are inner oceans at the polar holes their weight would cancel
out and be in balance. Now the answer that the reduced quantity of
molecular matter to about 70% will still have inertial and gravitational
mass of 100% full earth is answered a s follows. We already know from
the formulae of special relativity for a particle with velocity close to that
of light thus with double mass to that of the rest mass that the inertial and
gravitational mass is not in fixed proportionality with the quantity of
matter. We assume also as right the assumption of Einstein that the
gravitational mass of a body is about equal to its inertial mass. Here
is why a 70% quantity of matter hollow earth has inertial and
gravitational mass as if 100% full sphere. We had calculated that the

54
frequency of the spin of the electrons, protons and neutrons is at the range
1-2 terahertz of infrared. Thus at this frequency the molecular matter of
earth absorbs energy from the infrared of the solar radiation, it passes it to
the spin which in its turn passes it to heat of the fieldmatter thus to
gravitation. The inner space of the hollow earth would then have higher
fieldmatter temperature to that due to simply the quantity of matter of the
inner molecular atmosphere exactly like a greenhouse effect in the
fieldmatter temperature. Thus earth would gravitate more due to the
greenhouse effect of fieldmatter temperature due to the solar radiation at
1-2 terahertz. This could explain why we measure astronomically a
higher by about 30% gravitational and inertial mass of earth! This is the
very important role of the solar radiation to the earths gravitation.
Top Geologist: I can’t believe that you gave a way to resolve it,
even qualitatively. This is the most interesting thing I have heard in me
entire carrier! You should take the Nobel prize!

10) FIELDMATTER SOUND IN MEDICINE? Section 10 of the

book.

The equations and physical facts in this section are derived

entirely from the Democritus principle of particle matter and
Newton’s law of momentum conservation. Once we have understood
that the fielfdmatter is real finer resolution physical matter (for the
classical fields in gaseous state) we may predict in the neutral and non-
electromagnetised state acoustic waves in it. We start with the general
equation of the neutral fieldmatter fluid equation 12.1
(Newton’s law of Force (density) in the fieldmatter fluid
( density, velocity pressure, etc)) =
=(external forces (density) my molecular matter( molecular
density, molecular momentum density etc.)
(eq12.1)

55
 We only have to formulate the D’Alembert linear wave equations in
it (See references [Acoustic_wave_equation], [Wave_equation],
[D’Alembert operator] )
The acoustics waves with the D’Alembert hyperbolic linear
homogeneous wave equation are the next (See references
[Acoustic_wave_equation], [Wave_equation], [D’Alembert
operator] )
�2 �0 �2 �0 �2 �0 1 �2 �0
��2
+
��2
+
��2
− �2 ��2
=0 (eq3)

�2 �0 �2 �0 �2 �0 1 �2 �0
��2
+ ��2
+ ��2
− �2 ��2
=0 (eq4)

Where ρ0 is the density of the air and the u0 is the velocity of the
gaseous fluid . We apply them of course for the fieldmatter rather than
molecular air.
We may state them also over the pressures assuming an inviscid
incompressible gaseous fieldmatter.
�2 �0 �2 �0 �2 �0 1 �2 �0
��2
+
��2
+
��2
− �2 ��2
=0 (eq34)

(See references [Acoustic_wave_equation], [Wave_equation] ) It

is important to realize that he acoustics equations in an incompressible
fluid like water but here in the neutral fieldmatter (gaseous) fluid are
based on 5 linearization hypotheses (which we will state for simplicity in
one spatial dimension only)
1) Incompressible fluid and linearized state equation. and state
equation linearisation that the ambient density ρ0 is constant and in
general ρ=ρ0 (1+s), with small infinitesimal s changes, and similarly for
the pressure p=p0 +ps, . Staring from the state equation PV=nRT (see in
references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) we linearize it for the pressure p
and density ρ to p-p0=B(ρ-ρ0)/ρ0 , (eq 4.1)
where the p0 and ρ0 are the constant ambient pressures and densities
and B the adiabatic bulk modulus of the fluid which has physical units
dimensions that of pressure.

56
 2) Linearized continuity equations (mass conservation) (see again
�� ��
in references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) ��
+
��
=0 . (eq 4.2)
Where u is the velocity. From these 1), and 2) we easily derive the
equation
�� ��
��
+(1/�) ��
=0 (eq 4.3)
3) Inviscid fluid (no friction)
4) Zero convective acceleration and linearized Newtons force
(density) equation (Navier-Stokes equations). In other words, the
spatial partial derivatives of velocities are small compared to the
velocities
(� ∗ ∇� = �). (eq 4.4)
The non-linear Newton’s force equation is of the type
��
=− ∇� + ������� + �������� ������ ������� (eq 4.5)
��
��
Where is the material (moving with the fluid) velocity , and p the
��
pressure.
(see in the references [acoustic_wave_equation] and
[acoustic_wave_equation] and also in section 9 equation 11 ). The
linearized force equation in one dimension is
�� ��
ρ0 + =0 (eq 4.6)
�� ��
See [Acoustic_wave_equation] for this triple linearisation and
derivation of the D’ Alembert wave equations (eq 3) (eq 4).
We must not forget though that this is only an approximation and
that the true waves are non-linear, and this is why the sound in molecular
air and light in the fieldmatter, at small scale create particle-like behavior
so as to talk about particle “sononia” and photons.
We may notice in equation 3 of a sound wave, based on the densities,
that although it is used for incompressible fluids like molecular water,
strictly speaking it is impossible in a calculus of real functions of density
of the fluid (Weierstrass calculus) that do not admit infinitesimal
quantities like the old Newton-Leibniz calculus. The reason is that since
the water is incompressible the real numbers function of the density is
always constant thus also the higher derivative of time and space always

57
zero! But in a calculus that admits infinitesimals like the old Newton-
Leibniz calculus the density is a quantity ρ=ρ0 + sρ0 , which is a sum of a
real number and an infinitesimal and for such more general functions the
derivative may not be zero. In the references [Conway J. H] Conway
since 1976 has defined linearly ordered fields of quantities larger than the
rea numbers, which contain infinitesimals and infinites, and have a
calculus similar to that of real numbers (Weierstrass). In such a surreal
numbers Newton-Leibniz calculus, equation 3 of the sound in water , by
the densities is possible! And not only equation 3 but also the Dirac’s
Delta which requires infinite quantities. See also [Kyritsis K. 2022].
Nevertheless, the majority of the physicists, engineers and
mathematicians would prefer a calculus that does not utilize the infinite
and models the continuum of the molecular and fieldmatter fluids, with
an oncology of a continuum which still consists of finite particles only. E.
Shroendinger in [ Schroedinger Ε. 1961] Science and Humanism ,
describes clearly that the mathematical model of the continuum of
material fluids based on the real numbers with infinite many decimal
digits, is too much fictional and away of our perception of the continuum
of material reality consisting from finite many particles. Sharing the same
opinion, in [Kyritsis K. 2022] I developed an Engineer’s calculus or
digital calculus, where a physical material continuum which consists of
finite many particles (either molecular matter or fieldmatter) does have an
“optical” mathematical topology which makes it continuous and
connected and supports a calculus of continuous, differentiable and
integrable functions over finite only points of numbers which have only a
maximum finite number decimal digits. All the classical Weierstrass
calculus partial differential equations of fluids that we have stated in this
book occur also in this Engineers calculus or digital calculus, with the
usual properties (still a calculus logically differed in the ontology from
the classical Weierstrass calculus).
Since by know we know that the average speed of the elementary 3
particles of the fieldmatter as in the paragraph 4 (μp+ μe- μn0) is that of
the speed of light so also these waves travel at the speed of light. Thus we
may call such fieldmatter sound waves as weak neutral light . There

58
are giogi both in east and west who claim that at some point of their
saintly increased sensitivity they become able to see with the natural eyes
this weak neutral light which they call “aether vision” and see weak
luminous glow around all living bodies of trees or animals as if in a
kirlian photography (which has a different electromagnetic conduction
principle though) which is essentially the fieldmatter sound that the
functions of the cellular plasma creates.

Of course experimentally for the sound waves it is experimentally

practical to measure them with the pressures or densities or velocities,
while for the electromagnetic waves it is not experimentally practical
measure them with the scalar electric potential but rather from the electric
and magnetic vectors.
We should discriminate between 1) a time varying pressure or
density of standing molecular particle matter due no so to its spin but
some forced molecular sound oscillation (acoustics of molecular air)
which would create a pressure sound wave in the air but eventually in the
fieldmatter as well after the D’ Alambert hyperbolic wave equation 2)
the non-time varying molecular matter velocities D’Alambert non-
homogeneous wave equation , which is created by a moving molecular
matter particle as in the equation 20 in the previous paragraphs (acoustics
of fieldmatter sound) and which formulates the weak linear inertial
interactions (of neutral molecular matter with neutral field matter)
in the paragraph 12. These two phenomena 1) acoustics of molecular
air and 2) acoustics of fieldmatter sound, although with similar
mathematical equations, they are of different spatial scales.
Because the neutral fieldmatter wave (fieldmatter sound) but also
the electromagnetic fieldmatter waves practically give completely the
linearized interaction of the fieldmatter with the molecular matter
functions of the living cell in a biological body that are in the molecular
matter , (the gravitation as fieldmatter heat is not so effective at the scale
of the cell) these two types of waves suggest new methods of healing in
the medical science as follows

59
 1) When a human body is healthy it is scanned and all the
electromagnetic waves and field-sound frequencies of all its
tissues are recorded.

2) When this body turns ill at some tissue, with appropriate

devices the recorded healthy frequencies of light and fieldmatter
sound of these cells are imposed to these sick cells and the cells
start to “remember” their healthy functioning so that
autotherapy occurs.
3) This is essential the principle of bio-resonance in healing, but
bio-resonance has not so far used fieldmatter sound waves,
only electromagnetic waves. I believe it is better to use
electromagnetic waves at the spectrum of visible light which is
friendly to the human body, and for the rest of the frequencies
the fieldmtater sound waves. Maybe this change in the
technology and physics of bioresonance will turn it in to a
fully accepted , and experimentally tested medical method,
since so far has not yet been accepted as such.
We should remark also that it seems that the Chinese acupuncture
is based on that the living human body extends also as living tissues at the
fieldmatter, and has channels of flow of the neutral fieldmatter.

There is a quote of the ancient Pythagoras which more or less sais

“What we find in the matter of natural reality is a kind of solidified
music” I always was amazed from this phrase, and I would not be
surprised if someday, devices would be discovered that with fieldmatter
sound and light could create electrons, protons and neutrons, thus proving
that molecular matter is created from the fieldmatter sound and
light.
The fieldmatter sound waves at the speed of light together with the
eq 20 that couples molecular air sound waves at the speed of sound with
them suggest a remarkable phenomenon: When we speak in molecular air
we are heart at the speed of light even outside the planet if only very
sensitive devices could capture such fieldmatter sound waves!

60
 Still another remark is the next about the frequency of the electron
spin 1.8-2 terra Hertz that we computed at the paragraph 5 . Both
frequencies have wavelength which is between about 0.5 mm while the
dimension of the nitrogen atom is 56 pm, the mean free path in air is 68
nm , thus there is ultrasound in molecular air not only in fieldmatter with
that frequency too!
Finally we should predict that the neutral light or fieldmatter
sound is quantized at the small scale exactly as the ordinary light does
with the Compton effect and the equation E=hν. The reason that we can
predict it, is that as in the case of light also the absolutely correct
equations of the wave are not the D’ Alembert linear hyperbolic wave
equations as in (eq. 34) but rather non-linear wave derived from the
Navier-Stokes equations (eq.11), (eq.12). As is the case of light that the
approximate linear waves are quantized at microscale to photons, so the
case of neutral light or fieldmatter sound are quantized as if particles that
can be called phononions (the corresponding due to (the non-linear)
sound waves in molecular air are called sononions .

11) MAXWELL AS LINEAR APPROXIMATION. Section 11 of the

book. (Moebious group=Lorentz group)

The Maxwell’s equations and physical facts in this section are

derivable entirely from the Democritus principle of particle matter
(for the fieldmatter as well) Newton’s law of momentum
conservation and some well known hypotheses about the coupling of
charged molecular matter with charged fieldmatter as in the
Coulomb’s forces and Ampere’s law .
It is important for the experimental validity of the current physical
reality perception to realize that the unified non-linear Navier Stokes
equations 14, 14.1, 14.2 of the dynamic electromagnetism in the
paragraph 9 , should give by a kind of linearization and approximation
the classical linear Maxwell equations of electromagnetism. In other
words The Maxwell equations at the potential are derivable by a

61
linearization of the general 3 Navier-Stokes of charged field matter,
plus the postulations about the force densities in these cases.
We carry out such a linearziation derivation of the Maxwell’s
equations below.
It is important to realize that the original true
Electromagnetised fieldmatter of J.C. Maxwell is entirely under
Galilean relativity, because the velocities e.g. in the Lorentz force
formulae (see references [Lorentz force] ) or the Biot-Savart or
Ampere formulae were all relative to the fieldmatter and not relative
to an absolute vacuum inertial reference system as later Einstein
assumed. Actually as the eq1 and eq2 are mathematical equivalent to
a pair of forced acoustics waves equations in air and as such acoustic
phenomena are under the Galilean relativity so is also with the
Maxwell’s initial electromagnetised fieldmatter except not in
molecular matter but in fieldmatter as well. It seems, that the
classical Maxwell equations of electromagnetism require the hypothesis
of an inviscid and incompressible charged gaseous fieldmatter, while
the general Navier-Stokes equations as in (eq 14, 14.1, 14.2 ) and the N
Tesla’s inventions require effects of viscous and compressible charged
gaseous fieldmatter.
For the linearization-derivation of the Maxwell’s equation we do not
need to start from the 3 separate equations 14, 14.1, 14.2 , but we can
start from the equation 12
�� ��
��
��
=�
��
+ � ∗ ∇� =− ∇� + ∇� + ��� + �� (�� ) (eq12)

Where ρm is the mass density, u is the flow velocity, ∇ ⋅ is

the divergence, p is the pressure, t is time,τ is the deviatoric stress tensor
due to viscosity , which has order 2, fm is external density of force due to
the presence of molecular matter and
ffm is external density of force due to the deeper fieldmatter itself but not
due to contact with molecular matter. We may set it here=0 for simplicity
in the case of neutral fieldmatter. We assume here now that we are not

62
in the neutral field matter, but in the charged field matter
(electromagnetized fieldmatter as Maxwell was saying)
Where the Newton’s law of force still holds, but there is also the new
parameter of fieldmatter change density denoted by ρq , with which we
divide both sides of the equation 12 and setting the friction=0 to obtain
�� �� 1 �
�� ��
+ � ∗ ∇� =− � ∇� + � �� (eq 12.1)
� �

We define as electric field

�
E=- �� = E0 (eq 34.1)
��

and also the magnetic potential

�
A= ��u (eq 34.2)
�

The electric potential

�
α= (eq 34.3)
��

(see also section 7)

The magnetic field
B=curlA (eq 34.4)

We will assume different forms of external force-density �� due to the

presence of static charged molecular matter or moving charged
molecular matter .
1) when there is present static molecular mater of charge density q in
which case it holds that
� �
∇�� = � or ∇� = � (Coulomb law) (eq 34.5)
� �

3) when there is present moving molecular charged matter of electric

current density J in which case it holds that the external force is of the
form
� ��
E=− �� �� + � ×Ω where ��
=� (eq 34.6 )
And it holds that

63
 � ���
− �� + � ×B =�� � (Amperes law) (eq
��
34.7 )
We will derive the Maxwell’s equations as in section 7 in the SI system
of units (we must know that the equations of Maxwell have different
constants in different systems of units).
.
�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 �
��2 + �� 2 + ��2 − �2 ��2
=− �� /�� (eq1)

�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 �
��2
+ ��2 + ��2 − �2 ��2 =− �� � (eq2)

��
� =− − ∇� (eq 1.1)
��

� = ����� (eq 2.1)

The Lorentz gauge condition is the

� ��
∇� + �� �� =0 (eq 2.2)

We will utilize partly (only at the homegeneous part) the standard

linearization to derive the acoustic wave equation. The acoustics
equations in an incompressible fluid like water are based on 5
linearization hypotheses (which we will state for simplicity in one spatial
dimension only) (See references [Acoustic_wave_equation],
[Wave_equation])
1) Incompressible fluid and linearized state equation. and state
equation linearisation that the ambient density ρ0 is constant and in
general ρ=ρ0 (1+s), with small infinitesimal s changes, and similarly for
the pressure p=p0 +ps, . Staring from the state equation PV=nRT (see in
references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) we linearize it for the pressure p
and density ρ to p-p0=B(ρ-ρ0)/ρ0 , (eq 4.1)
where the p0 and ρ0 are the constant ambient pressures and densities
and B the adiabatic bulk modulus of the fluid which has physical units
dimensions of pressure.

64
 2) Linearized continuity equations (mass conservation) (see again
�� ��
in references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) ��
+
��
=0 . (eq 4.2)
Where u is the velocity. From these 1), and 2) we easily derive the
equation
�� ��
��
+(1/�) ��
=0 (eq 4.3)

(which as we shall see later in section 11 will give as a Laurentz gauge

condition of the potentials).
3) Inviscid fluid (no friction)
4) Zero convective acceleration and linearized Newtons force
(density) equation (Navier-Stokes equations). In other words, the
spatial partial derivatives of velocities are small compared to the
velocities
(� ∗ ∇� = �). (eq 4.4)
The non-linear Newton’s force equation is of the type
��
��
=− ∇� + ������� + �������� ������ ������� (eq 4.5)
��
Where ��
is the material (moving with the fluid) velocity , and p the
pressure.
(see in the references [acoustic_wave_equation] and
[acoustic_wave_equation] and also in section 9 equation 11 ). The
linearized force equation in one dimension is
�� ��
ρ0 ��
+ �� = 0 (eq 4.6)
See [Acoustic_wave_equation] for this triple linearisation and
derivation of the D’ Alembert wave equations (eq 3) (eq 4). We must
not forget though that this is only an approximation and that the true
waves are non-linear, and this is why the sound in molecular air and
light in the fieldmatter, at small scale create particle-like behavior so as to
talk about particle “sononia” and photons.
So in the above linearisation the role of the density ρ is now played by
�� �
the quotient ��
, and the role of the pressure, the quotient ��
(pressure
divided by charge density)

65
So we start with the non-linear equation 12.1 as above and we apply step
by step (at first in one dimension which is easy and then in 3 dimensions)
the acoustic wave linearization describe above, and in references
(wikipedia, [acoustic_wave_equation]) and we result at first in the linear
wave (Dalambert) non-homogeneous equation
�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 � �
��2
+
��2
+
��2
−
�2 ��2
=− ∇� (and by (eq 34.5)=- ��
(eq34.8)
And again we start with the non-linear equation 12 as above and we apply
step by step (at first in one dimension which is easy and then in 3
dimensions) the acoustic wave linearization described above, and in
references (wikipedia, [acoustic_wave_equation]) and we result a
second time in the linear wave (Dalambert) non-homogeneous equation
�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 � � ���
( ��2
+
��2
+
��2
− �2 ��2
) = �� ��
− � × � =− �� � (eq34.9)

Therefore we derived the Maxwells equations 1, 2. We may even

derive the Lorentz gauge condition from the equation 4.3 We notice from
the linearization hypotheses 1) of “incompressible” that the Maxwell’s
equations hold only for small changes of the charge density and mass
density of the fieldmatter !

On the other hand the non-linear non-Maxwell electromagentism as in

equation 12.1 already has as valid the Coulomb’s law and Ampere’s law
by hypothesis (on the external forces) . The Gauss law of magnetism as
also a direct property of the mathematics of curl, and so it remains the
law of Faraday, which is not valid in its exact details in eq. 12.1,
neither the corresponding relation of E with the electromagnetic
potentials. A corrected law of induction of Faraday leads to non-linear
electromagnetic waves, that may explain the occurrence of the particle-
like photons,

66
12) EINSTEIN as linear approximation. Section 12 of the book.

The equations and physical facts in this section are derived

entirely from the Democritus principle of particle matter (for the
fieldmatter as well) Newton’s law of momentum conservation and
some natural hypotheses about the coupling of neutral molecular
matter with neutral fieldmatter similar to those in Maxwell’s
electromagnetism.
Other points that will be discussed in this paragraph are: Why the
present weak inertial interactions do not assume the axiom about light
and allow for particles going faster than light. The role of the frequency
of molecular matter for a molecular body to travel faster than light
In section 10 we have seen that there exists a SIMILAR TO
ACCOUSTICS linearization approximation in the neutral fieldmatter,
which therefore is Lorentz invariant. We shall use it to explains
relativistic inertial phenomena and derive special relativity formulae
without the Einstein’s axiom about the speed of light
We are giving the name weak inertial interactions to the class of
gas-dynamics neutral fieldmatter effects (sometimes called antigravity
because the may go against gravitation due to the heat sources in the
neutral filed matter)
It is important to realize that the acoustics equations in an
incompressible fluid like water are based on 5 linearization hypotheses
(which we will state for simplicity in one spatial dimension only) (See
references [Acoustic_wave_equation], [Wave_equation]
1) Incompressible fluid and linearized state equation. and state
equation linearisation that the ambient density ρ0 is constant and in
general ρ=ρ0 (1+s), with small infinitesimal s changes, and similarly for
the pressure p=p0 +ps, . Staring from the state equation PV=nRT (see in
references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) we linearize it for the pressure p
and density ρ to p-p0=B(ρ-ρ0)/ρ0 , (eq 4.1)
where the p0 and ρ0 are the constant ambient pressures and densities
and B the adiabatic bulk modulus of the fluid which has physical units
dimensions of pressure.

67
 2) Linearized continuity equations (mass conservation) (see again
�� ��
in references [acoustic_wave_equation] ) ��
+
��
=0 . (eq 4.2)
Where u is the velocity. From these 1), and 2) we easily derive the
equation
�� ��
��
+(1/�) ��
=0 (eq 4.3)

(which as we shall see later in section 11 will give as a Laurentz gauge-

like condition of the velocity and pressure later in this section).
3) Inviscid fluid (no friction)
4) Zero convective acceleration and linearized Newtons force
(density) equation (Navier-Stokes equations). In other words, the
spatial partial derivatives of velocities are small compared to the
velocities
(� ∗ ∇� = �). (eq 4.4)
The non-linear Newton’s force equation is of the type
��
��
=− ∇� + ������� + �������� ������ ������� (eq 4.5)
��
Where ��
is the material (moving with the fluid) velocity , and p the
pressure.
(see in the references [acoustic_wave_equation] and
[acoustic_wave_equation] and also in section 9 equation 11 ). The
linearized force equation in one dimension is
�� ��
ρ0 ��
+ �� = 0 (eq 4.6)
See [Acoustic_wave_equation] for this triple linearisation and
derivation of the D’ Alembert wave equations (eq 3) (eq 4). We must
not forget though that this is only an approximation and that the true
waves are non-linear, and this is why the sound in molecular air and
light in the fieldmatter, at small scale create particle-like behavior so as to
talk about particle “sononia” and photons.
We shall apply this linearization partly to the Navier-Stokes equations of
the neutral fieldmatter, partly because we will result in non-homogeneous
wave equations and not homogeneous as in acoustics. We start with the

68
general equation 12 of section 10 of a compressible model of the neutral
fieldmatter
�� ��
�
��
=�
��
+ � ∗ ∇� =− ∇� + ∇� + ��� + �� (eq12)

Where ρ is the mass density, u is the flow velocity, ∇ ⋅ is the divergence

operator, p is the pressure, t is time,τ is the deviatoric stress tensor due to
viscosity , which has order 2, fm is external density of force due to the
presence of molecular matter and
ffm is external density of force due to the deeper fieldmatter itself but not
due to contact with molecular matter. We may set it here ffm =0 for
simplicity in the case of neutral fieldmatter. We will assume external
force-density due to the presence of neutral moleciular matter
1) when there is present static molecular mater of density � m in which
case it holds that (for an appropriate constant s2)
∇�� =�2 �m (eq 35.1)
2) when there is present moving molecular matter at speed v and thus
having momentum density Jm=� m v , in which case it holds that (for an
appropriate constant s1)
���
��
=�1 �� (eq 35.2)
So we start with the non-linear equation 12 as above and we apply step
by step (at first in one dimension which is easy and then in 3 dimensions)
the acoustic wave linearization describe above, and in references
(wikipedia, [acoustic_wave_equation]) and we result at first in the linear
wave (Dalambert) non-homogeneous equation
�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 �
��2
+
��2
+
��2
−
�2 ��2
= ∇�� (and by (eq 35.1)= �2 � m

(eq35.3)

And again we start with the non-linear equation 12 as above and we apply
step by step (at first in one dimension which is easy and then in 3
dimensions) the acoustic wave linearization described above, and in
references (wikipedia, [acoustic_wave_equation]) and we result a
second time in the linear wave (Dalambert) non-homogeneous equation

69
 �2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 � ���
( ��2
+ ��2
+ ��2
− �2 ��2
)=
��
= �1 �� (after (eq 35.2))
(eq35.4)
The homogeneous forms of them are the next that we identified as
the sound wave equation in fieldmatter in the paragraph 10.
�2 � �2 � �2 � 1 �2 �
��2
+ ��2
+ ��2
− �2 ��2
=0 (eq4)

We must not forget though that this is only an approximation and

that the true waves are non-linear, and this is why the sound in molecular
air and light in the fieldmatter, at small scale create particle-like behavior
so as to talk about particle “sononia” and photons.
It is well know that the symmetries or the transformations that leave
invariant the homogeneous linear hyperbolic wave equation of
D’Alembert as in eq4 are the Lorentz group of transformations (See
references [Heras Ricardo 2016] ) This action of the Lorentz
transformations is called active interpretation of the Lorentz
transformations as contrasted to the Einstein’s interpretation of the
Lorentz transformations as changes of coordinates in inertial systems of
coordinates which is called passive interpretation of the Lorentz
transformations.
In one dimension the Lorentz transformations are the enxt
vx
t' = γ(t − ) (eq36)
c2

x' = γ(x − vt) (eq37)

v2
γ= 1−
c2
(eq38)

Where t is time x is distance u is the velocity , c the speed of light

and the primed are the transformed.
The eq20 essentially describes a linear approximation of the
interaction of the molecular matter with the field matter in the form of a
forced wave equation.

70
 This in 20th century physics has been called “wave nature” of the
molecular matter particles and described in smaller space and time scale
plus probabilistically by the Shroendiger equation. Because of this the
particles of molecular matter experience acceleration according to the
grad of the temperature of the filedmatter as the light waves (photons) do
also which is the base of the universal attraction or gravitation as
described in the paragraph 9.

Based on this coupling we explained in the paragraph 9 why the ,

electrons, protons, neutrons ae also attracted by heat sources in the
fieldmatter besides the photons.
But the same equation can also derive all the formulae od special
relativity without assuming that nothing goes faster than light and that the
speed of light is the same in all inertial reference systems (Actually it is
proved in [KYRITSIS C-TZANAKIS C(first author). 1984] that by
only assuming that the speed of light in the absolute vacuum (even of
the fieldmatter) is the same in all directions in inertial reference systems
is adequate to give that it will also have the same speed in all inertial
systems) In order to eliminate this axiom of Einstein about the speed of
light we need to extend the Lorentz invariance from the homeogeneous
equation 4 to the non-homogeneous equation 20. So we put the next
axioms.

AXIOM 1=THE PARTICLES OF MOLECULAR MATTER

MOVING OR NOT ARE COUPLED INERTIALLY WITH THE
FIELD MATTER IN VELOCITIES WITH DALAMBERT LINEAR
ACOUSTIC WAVE EQUATION AS IN EQ20.

AXIOM 2=THE AUTOMORPHISMS OF THE

HOMOGENEOUS WAVE EQUATIONS ARE THE SAME WITH
THE AUTOMORPHIMS OF THE NON-HOMOGENEOUS WHEN
COUPLED WITH PARTICLES OF MOLECULAR MATTER

Compare them with the wrong axioms of Einstein

71
 Axiom E1=All inertial systems of reference are equivalent for the
description of motion of molecular particles
Axiom E2=In all inertial systems of reference the speed of light is
the same.
The derivations of all the well-known equations of special relativity
are of identical calculations as those that are used to derive them from the
axioms E1 E2 of Einstein except that we interpret the Lorentz
transformations in the actve mode and not in the passive mode. In
particular the next equations are derived for the momentum and energy of
molecular matter (not of fieldmatter!)

� = ��2 (eq39)
E2=(m0)2c4+p2c2 (eq40)
�0 �
�= (eq41)
�2
1− 2
�

Where m0 is the rest mass of the molecular matter particle u its

velocity p its momentum, E its energy, m its mass at speed u, cis the
speed of light.

We might go still further with the general theory of relativity of

Einstein and prove the next theorem

Theorem. There is a mathematic physics model interpretation of

Einstein’s theories of both special and general relativity as a field theory
within classical Galilean flat space and separate time where the Lorentz
transformations are interpreted in the active not passive way and where
in the theory of gravitation the mathematics describe the curving of the
photon paths not the curving of space-time.

It is only the space in this paper that prohibits us to enlarge on this

theorem.

Of course we could easily define in the present gravitation theory of

the fieldmatter a Minkowski Pseudo-Riemannian 4-manfold, to
describe the curved way that the light propagates due to gravitation in the

72
Euclidean flat space. And we could also formulate a gravitation in the
mode of Einstein by setting a tensor as responsible for the curvature
of the pseudo-Riemannian 4-dimensional manifold. But this tensor
would not depend on the matter-energy as Einstein formulated it, but
solely on sources of heat of the fieldmatter (and of course some heat
sources would be due to the quantity of matter). My guess is that
Einstein predicts much more gravity in the universe that what actually
occurs due to his general energy part of his tensor. Instead only heat
energy creates gravitation.
In spite the fact that such a pseudo-Riemann 4-manifold would be
convenient for measurements of gravitation by the paths of light, instead
of the potential of the current article, it is too indirect and complicated to
formulate as a 1st approach and would obscure the clear and rich physical
meaning within fluid dynamics that we intent with the current article.
Besides it would be a conversion of the linear Lorentz invariant equation
20 to a non-linear macroscopic version (Minkowski Pseudo-Riemann 4-
maniform) which would be incorrect and phenomenological only
compared to the correct, at the potentials, non-linear equations 14, 15.

The special relativity is considered experimentally proved

because the previous formulae eq39-eq41 have been tested, But since
the same formulae are deduced from different axioms we conclude
that in fact there is no experimental proof of the axiom E2 of Einstein
than in all inertial systems the speed of light is the same and then
nothing goes faster than the speed of light. As in addition many more
other experiments that we describe in this paper support and also those
in the paragraph 14 the approach adopted in this paper and we should
consider this axioms of Einstein as refuted by experiments!
One may argue that also in the present linear inertial interaction, the
equations 39-41 give that if the speed of the particle approaches the speed
of light its mass tends to infinite thus nothing goes faster than light. But
this is resolved because we definitely assumed that the axioms 1,2 of this
paragraph give an approximate linear coupling of particles of the
molecular matter with the field matter and not an absolute law of nature.

73
The limit of the infinite mass is where this linear coupling stops to hold,
quite similarly as the many usual aerodynamic equations of the coupling
of the wings of an airplane stop to hold at the supersonic flights.

To understand better why the experimental proofs of the formulae of

special relativity do not prove the axiom E1 of Einsteins, let us compare
the two theories here with the Euclidean and Lobatzefsky geometry. The
Euclidean geometry has an axiom that from a point outside a line only
one parallel line exist. The Lobatzefsky geometry postulates that many
parallels exist.

Now there is also the derived theorem in both geometries that if we

join with a linear segment an interior point of a triangle with an exterior
point it will cross at least one of the sides. If the latter theorem is proved
experimentally Lobatzefsky now obviously cannot claim that there is an
experimental proof of his axioms of parallels.
An example of particles that have not the limitation of the speed of
light are obviously the particles that make the fieldmatter, the
microelectron, microproton and microneutron, (μp+ μe- μn0) that
obviously are not coupled with the macroscopic behavior of the field
matter itself by the Dalambert wave equation. And as in the molecular air
the average speed of the molecules is about the speed of the sound and
determine the speed of the sound so also in the fieldmatter the average
speed of these free and permanent particles (μp+ μe- μn0) is about the
speed of light and determine the speed of light in the fieldmatter.

It is apparent now why the axioms of Einstein’s special relativity

in an utterly unfortunate way prohibited the existence of these
constituent particles of the fieldmatter (μp+ μe- μn0) (because they
also travel faster than the light) and thus all the Navier-Stokes
equations of the unified fieldmatter and electrogravity that would
lead to the solar energy of N. Tesla and so the fieldmatter propulsion
could not be discovered theoretically. Instead the Einstein’s special
relativity was used in the Nuclear energy and Nuclear propulsion.
This is very unfortunate because Einstein himself was against the
nuclear energy and in favor of the renewable energy. And of course

74
the unfortunate situation becomes even worse with the general relativity
and Einstein’s’ gravitation. Which is a quite buzzard phenomenological
conceptually confusing mathematical complicated theory. To me there is
no doubt that is poorly and ambiguously verified as compared to the case
of special relativity discussed here that its equations are much more
verified. Unfortunately, it is hopeless to unify Einstein’s gravitation with
electromagnetism or reveal the true simple and natural common physical
ontology as fieldmatter of the electromagnetic and gravitational field. I
will not be surprise if the future history of physics will prove that both
Einstein’s theories of relativity are as the Ptolemaic theories in astronomy
and Einstein will turn to be the modern Ptolemy of physics.

The velocity waves with dalambertian hyperbolic equation of a

neutral particle in eq20 is also a quantitative formulation at relatively
middle space and time scale of the effect of a moving neutral particle of
molecular matter on the field matter (mechanism of fieldmatter drag force.
Similar to that the electromagnetic field of earth follows the earth). This
in particular explains the Michelson Morley experiment plus the light
aberration. But of course the more correct non-linear equations of
interaction of neutral fieldmatter with molecular matter are the equation
15 in the paragraph 9.
Here is a list of experiments relevant to the drag force of the
molecular matter to the fieldmatter. See references [Sagnac effect],
[Trouton-Noble experiment], [Rayleih and Brace
Experiments] , [Hammar experiment], [ Michelson-Gale-Pearson
experiment], [Aspden experiment] [DePalma
experiment]. [Hayasaka,H.Tackeuchi S.]. In some of them the drag
force due to the scale and velocities is negligible and in some of them it is
significant. All of them though describe various sides of the reality of the
neutral fieldmatter in its weak inertial interaction with the molecular
matter decribed here by equation 15 and its approximate
linearization eq20.
This unfortunate twist by Einstein to interpret the Lorentz
transformations in the passive way instead of the active way, came
according to Max Born due to a mistaken remark of Lorentz that we

75
cannot have simultaneously that the fieldmatter is dragged by the
rotations of earth so that the speed of light is measured in the Michelson-
Morley experiment the same in all directions in the fieldmatter and at the
same time we have the aberration of light in the telespopes.
But this is not really so. We may have both!
Aberration of light (see references [Aberration of light]). The
aberration of light is usually described over the geometry of a telescope
in an absolute vacuum, This has led some physicists (including Lorentz
according to Max Born) that if the fieldmatter follows the earth , then
there is no aberration. But this is not so because it may not occur
aberration around the telescope but it occurs in somewhere higher
where the fieldmatter stops gradually following the earth. This is also
with the aberration of sound in an airplane which occurs even when
heard inside the airplane at the air that follows the airplane. The
aberration of light although different is similar to the refraction of light.
If a telescope is inside the sea water very close to the surface it will have
light refraction. But if it is deep in the ocean although it will not have
light refraction around it , the light refraction will occur high at the
surface but the final result will include change of the light ray angle thus
refraction.
If we want a more exact description of the phenomenon we should
include the bending of the light ray due to the earth and sun gravitation.
Can a solid molecular body after all travel faster than the light?
We mentioned previously that the particles of the fieldmatter travel
in the average by the speed of light , thus a percentage of them faster than
the speed of light. But what about a molecular matter body? The
equations 14, 15 of the paragraph 9 and in particular the force density
terms are the relevant equations. There is not other hindrance except of
that the protons, neutrons, electrons may not drag fast and strong enough
the elctromagnetised fieldmatter around them , causing a disintegration
of the molecules and metal lattices of the body thus a disintegration of the
molecular body. But the same equations depend the force density terms
on the frequency of the spin of the rhe basic elementary particles.We
conclude that

76
 There is CRITICAL SPIN FREQUENCY of the spin of
electrons , protons, neutrons of a molecular material body should have
to be able to travel faster than the light. Lower than this frequency it
cannot travel faster than the speed of liht while higher than this
frequency it can.
The next table summarizes the difference and similarities of the two
logically and physically different theories of the Lorentz invariant wave
inertia and the special relativity.
Table 5
THEORY Absolute Material Ability to Ability to
bound of existence of understand discover solar
light velocity the the energy stored
fieldmatter mechanism of in the field
bending of matter as heat
light by
gravitation

Einstein’s YES NO NO NO
special
relativity

Linear NO YES YES YES

Lorentz
invariant
wave inertia

77
Table 6
THEORY Fieldmatter Experimentally Relativity of Lorentz
waves and verified formulae inertial systems group
molecular invariance
matter
particle
coupling

Einstein’s NO YES YES Lorentz YES

special transformations
relativity

Linear YES YES (same YES Galilean YES

Lorentz formulae) transformations
invariant
wave
inertia

78
13) CHEAP SOLAR ENERGY FROM THE HEAT OF THE
FIELDMATTER? Sections 9 , 15 of the book.

As we wrote in the paragraph 9 the main source of gravitation is the

heat of the fieldmatter, and in particular for earth it seems that 30% of it
is due to the solar radiation at the 1-2 terahertz infrared rather than due to
the quantity of matter of earth. The molecular quantity of matter of earth
by the spin of its 3 basic particles , electron , proton neutron and friction
in the fieldmatter create the heat for the gravitation. The spin rotation of
protons , neutrons, electrons in the field matter by friction create heat in
the field matter , which in its turn creates the gravitation that is why the
Newtonian gravitational field . depends on the quantity of matter. The
frequency of this spin as we mentioned is about 1-2 terra Herz in the
infrared. The average spin rotational or angular momentum is constant.
The energy of the spin is replenished by absorption of energy of solar
light waves at the same infrared frequency of 1 terra Hertz. It can also be
replenished by the molecular matter heat that randomly is converted by
collisions to spin of the above triad of particles. In addition, the traveling
of light waves or photons inside a hollow body is not entirely without
friction which also adds to the heat of the fieldmatter or gravitational
potential energy. From this point of view, the gravitational potential
energy is renewable as long as solar energy is stored in it.
Therefore, we may predict that there are devices that can extract the
fieldmatter heat of earth. How this can be done? Let us look at how
nature extract heat from the molecular air. The best known phenomenon
is the tornado, with an upward helix motion of the air. The tornado thus
has a shape of a cone, and as the air moves upward a detonation
phenomenon occurs as it moves from faster and smaller diameter parts
of the cone to a slower and larger diameter part of the cone. As it is
known a detonation of air will drop its temperature and heat will be
subtracted from it. This hear it converted to rotational kinetic energy of
the air which sustains the rotation of the tornado in spite the friction. We
may call this well-known phenomenon as the cone-expansive tornado

79
heat effect. . It turns out, that the classical Maxwell equations of
electromagnetism require the hypothesis of an inviscid and
incompressible charged gaseous fieldmatter (with zero convective
acceleration as well) , while the general Navier-Stokes equations as in
(eq 14) and the N Tesla’s inventions require effects of viscous and
compressible charged gaseous fieldmatter.
Now we may predict that a similar phenomenon in much smaller
space and time scale can be created in the fieldmatter. It requires of
course as external molecular matter trigger by the force density terms in
the Navier-Stokes fieldmatter unified equations. For the cone-expansive
tornado heat effect to occur in the fieldmatter the molecular matter
trigger could be either rotating magnets, or disc-shaped coils, or
asymmetric rotating metal discs that apply centripetal forces to electrons
etc. This means that in a cone the fieldmatter would expand, dropping its
temperature, and converting heat to kinetic energy exactly as with
ordinary molecular matter tornados. Furthermore such smaller cone-
expansive tornado heat effect could occur in the lightning effect in the
molecular vacuum, or even in air. We also may predict that the fall of the
fieldmatter temperature will induce a smaller fall in the involved
molecular matter temperature which when it happens is called cold
electricity. In fact it seems that all the above methods have been
discovered the last century by various inventors since the time of N.
Tesla. Nevertheless, none of them including N. Tesla was
acknowledged as a valid and understood inventions due the luck of
the current article correct physical interpretations and equations of
electromagnetism and gravitation and the prevailing of Einsteins
theories. N Tesla had met J C Maxwell , and it is unfortunate that they
had not met and cooperate with L. Boltzmann , because if they had, and
J. C. Maxwell who called the electromagnetic field the electromagnetised
aether (fieldmatter) would reformulate his equations along the lines of
statistical theory of the fieldmatter gas of L Boltzmann, and we as
civilization, would have solved the CO2 problem one century earlier.
On could say for the many inventors who were suppressed in
this way that ” If you are 3 steps ahead they declare you as insane, if

80
you are 2 steps ahead they declare you a crook, if you are one step
ahead, they ignore you, but if you are one step behind they might give
you the Nobel prize!”
It seems that the N. Tesla method for this fieldmatter renewable
solar energy was by lightings and sparks and his towers, in large or small
size (phenomena related to his magnifying transmitter). Modern
experiments by K. Meyl (see [Meyl Konstantin 2000] ) with miniature
towers verify the magnifying transmission phenomenon, where the
received energy is larger than the transmitted energy. The same with the
similar work of E. Gray . On the other hand, the inventors (See
references ) J. Searl. De Palma, P. Baumann (testatika, Switzerland ) ,
P.Tewari (India) , L Szabo EBM generator (Hungary) , [Naudin J] are
utilizing rotating magnets to crate the fieldmatter cone-expansive
tornado heat effect.
We should mention also that the various HHO devices with special
types of resonating electrolysis and also devices that utilize hard
treatment of water to extract extra heat should be unserstood as utilizing
the fieldmatter cone-expansive tornado heat effect at a molecular
microscopic scale.
Furthermore the fieldmatter cone-expansive tornado heat effect
could be created in the neutral fieldmatter as well not only on the
charged or electromagnetiszed, by other types of rotating machines.
There are inventors who claim that they have discovered such renewable
energy devices and they call them gravitational generators.
It is ecologically and planetary quality design to have rules of
uniform distribution on the surface of the planet of extraction of such
renewable fieldmatter energy from the potential gravitational energy
(stored and renewed by solar energy) by a large number of
decentralized installations as much better and safer than centralized
and concentrated installations. Happily, direct calculations show that
even if the extraction of such energy is less than what already is lost as
molecular matter heat radiation of the planet, it is sufficient to power
the electricity of all the humanity!

81
 Besides the renewable solar energy from the gravitational field ,
these new Navier-Stokes unifying equations and perceptions about the
fieldmatter, suggest also new fieldmatter propulsion, similar to the
rockets propulsion, except now at the layer of the fieldmatter.
For example by creating small fieldmatter tornado with discshaped
or cone shaped coils, or rotating magnets, and pusihing it by molecular
matter in a direction through the momentum conservation of matter
(either fieldmatter or molecular matter) a molecular matter vehicle
would travel in the road, in the sea, in the atmosphere, or outside the
planet. If flying discs exist as many eyewitnesses claim, then this is how
they should function and could be called fieldmatter-helicopters. See
references [Naudin J]
The next table compares the classical linear Maxwell’s
electromagnetism with the true non-linear electromagnetism of section 8
in relation to N Tesla’s inventions.

THEORY Incompressible Inviscid ZERO Ability to

fieldmatter field CONVECTIVE describe
matter ACCELERATION N Tesla’s
inventions

Maxwell YES YES YES NO

electromagnetism (small changes
of charge
density and
mass density
of the
fieldmatter)

True non-linear NO NO NO YES

electromagnetism (Large
changes as
well of charge
and mass
density of
fieldmatter)

82
14) Does MAXWEL and EINSTEIN allow for the existence of flying
discs? (The answer is No! )
The answer to this question I think is now obvious! It is a No. As we
mentioned in the paragraph 6, not even the accidental clumsy flying disc
of J. Searl cannot be explained with only the Maxwell’s equations. No
extra energy is possible in Maxwell’s equations because , no expansive
cone with drop of the temperature is describable by equations that assume
adiabatic processes and incompressibility . Furthermore the propulsion of
the J Searl disc is not also describable, since we assume
incompressibility and zero convective accelerations. It is like expecting
that the equations of acoustics in air are sufficient to describe the
aerodynamic phenomena of air-planes. Finally that flying discs might
travel faster than the light , is not allowed by the absolute axioms of
Einsteins special relativity.

15) THE APPROPRIATE WISDOM FOR THE MILITARY AND

PEACEFUL APPLICATIONS. FIRST A PHYSICAL AND
MATHEMATICAL THEORY AND THEN ENGINEERING
APPLICATIONS NOT VICE-VERSA. We do not apply what we can
discover but we discover what we apply safely for all. (Power,
inequalities, and speed of evolution)

For the present the road that seems open for a 21st century Democritus
paradise, is that of re-writing our equations of the classical fields to
become more true and corrects, following the right intuition (as in the
current presentation) and at the same time providing simple University
experiments that support this new version of the discovered equations.
First we aim and then we pull the trigger not the other way around.
The other, road, of first discovering new practical and experimental
devices, and directly commercializing the technology , without at the

83
same time modifying in a valid way the known Universities theory and
equations, has been proved to fail and it is a dead-end road.
WE MUST NOT APPLY WHAT EVER WE CAN DISCOVER BUT
WE SHOULD DISCOVER ONLY WHAT CAN BE APPLY FOR THE
GOOD OF ALL.

16) EPILOGUE.

In this outline we indicated how to 1) model the classical fields of

gravitation and electromagnetism as fieldmatter 2) Correct and unify the
equations of classical Maxwell electromagnetism and Newtonian
gravitation , while abandoning the Einstein’s gravitation 3) Re-derive the
special relativity formulae, as good approximations under special
conditions but without the axioms of relativity or that nothing goes faster
than light 4) Speculate about solar renewable energy possible to extract
from the gravitational field either directly or through the electromagnetic
field and electromagnetic devices and the existence new electromagnetic
fieldmatter propulsion devices. This would be the true theoretical source
of the solution of the global planetary CO2 problem. 5) Speculate about
new applications in medicine through the fieldmatter sound (neutral light)
that might revolutionize the bio-resonance methods.

Acknowledgments. I would like to thank the Laboratory of

Hydrodynamics and the Laboratory of Aerodynamics of National
Technical University of Athens, for their support in the analysis of the
Navier Stokes equations, and general encouragement in the present
research. Also the Software Laboratory of the Department of Electrical
Engineering for the computer support. I want also to thank the
Department of Mechanical Engineering of the National Technical
University of Athens for the consulting on magnets, and electric engines.
I would like also to thank Dr D. Matravers of the Departments of
computer science and mathematics, at the University of Portsmouth, that
although devoted to relativistic physics, he was kind enough, to ask me
for a lecture and presentation of the present ideas, at their early stage of

84
creation during 1996-97 at the University of Portsmouth. In addition, I
would like to thank, Dr Evans, from the B.A. and the green-glow project
that after communicating with Dr M. Duffy at the Sunderland University,
invited me in UK, and the University of Lancaster, that provided the
facilities for the Lecture during 1998. I would like also to thank Dr H.
Aspden for his discussions and valuable encouragement. I would like to
also to thank the University of Ioannina in Greece, for providing its
library facilities for the research and relevant conferences.
I would like to thank the national Technical University of Athens
(and especially prof E. Christophorou) for the opportunity to give
this presentation.
Finally, I would like to thank all the friends, and researchers and
many other people, that with discussions, enthusiasm, and encouragement,
contributed somehow to take the decision to write this paper. The author
stresses in advance that the main merit of this book is not the exact
mathematical form of the unified phenomena of the fieldmatter fluid
(which may have different constants in different systems of units and
in some cases different mathematical equations according to the
degree of approximation we require) but the clearer physical
ontology of the fieldmatter as material fluid from positive , negative and
neutral permanent and free particles interacting with Coulomb laws. From
this and the Newton’s law of force or momentum conservation we can
unify, gravitation, electromagnetism and relativistic) inertia with more
true non-Maxwell and non-Einstein gravitation equations. Although
some of the equations presented here may change after
experimentation, the main thought-form of the fieldmatter as a finer
(positive, negative, neutral) particles fluid will still be true.

85
 REFERENCES

[Aberration of light ] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aberration_of_light

[Acoustic_wave_equation]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acoustic_wave_equation

[Aspect, Alain 1982]; Dalibard, Jean; Roger, Gérard \date =December

1982 (1982). "Experimental Test of Bell's Inequalities Using Time-
Varying Analyzers". Physical Review Letters. 49 (25): 1804–
1807. Bibcode:1982PhRvL..49.1804A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.
1804.
[Aspden, H.] a) Anti-gravity electronics Electronic &Wireless World
January 1989 b) The theory of Antigravity Physical Essays
Volume 4,number 1 1991 .http://www.aspden.org/`
http://www.energyscience.co.uk/books.htmlhttp://www.padrak.co
m/ine/NEN_4_8_1.html
[Baumann P, Testatika]
https://www.robkalmeijer.nl/techniek/experiments/testakica/index.
html https://docplayer.net/36693917-The-methernitha-free-energy-
machine-the-swiss-m-l-converter.html
http://www.rexresearch.com/testatik/testart.htm
[Bohm D.-Vigier J.P.] “Model of the causal interpretation of quantum
theory in terms of a fluid with irregular fluctuations “Physical
Review 96pp 208-216 (1954)

[Conway J.H.] On numbers and games (surreal numbers) Academic

press 1976

[D’Alembert operator]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/D%27Alembert_operator

[Democritus] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

[DePalma B. gyrodrop
experiment]. https://depalma.pairsite.com/gyrodrop.html
86
 https://brucedepalma.com/
https://www.scribd.com/document/175723546/Bruce-DePalma
https://depalma.pairsite.com/gyrodrop.html

[Dirac P.A.M 1951 ] Is there an eather?Proc.Roy.Soc.

A.209 ,291 ,(1951)

[Double-slit experiment 1927] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-

slit_experiment

[Einstein A. 1952] The principle of relativity , Dover publications Inc.

1952

[EPR paradox] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EPR_paradox

[Hammar experiment]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hammar_experiment
[Hayasaka,H.Tackeuchi S.] Phys. Rev. Lett 63, 2701 (1989)

https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.2701

[Heat equation] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_equation

[Hensen, B, et al. (October 2015)]. "Loophole-free Bell inequality

violation using electron spins separated by 1.3
kilometres". Nature. 526 (7575): 682–
686. arXiv:1508.05949. Bibcode:2015Natur.526..682H. doi:10.10
38/nature15759. PMID 26503041.

[Heras Ricardo 2016] Lorentz transformations and the wave equation

European Journal of Physics 37(2):025603

[Giustina, M, et al. (December 2015)]. "Significant-Loophole-Free Test

of Bell's Theorem with Entangled Photons". Physical Review
Letters. 115 (25):

87
 250401. arXiv:1511.03190. Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115y0401G. doi:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250401. PMID 26722905.
[ Itzycson ClaudeZuber Jean-Bernard] Quantum Field Theory

[Naudin J] http://jnaudin.free.fr/lifters/main.htm

[Kyritsis Constantine 1998: The Lancaster Lecture.

http://users.softlab.ece.ntua.gr/~kyritsis/PapersinPhysics/Lancast8
_suspended.htm
https://thenewuniversalattraction.blogspot.com/2012/11/215-from-
lancaster-lecture-older.html

[Kyritsis c-Tzanakis C(first author). 1984] On Special Relativity's

Second Postulate, September 1984 Annales de la Fondation Louis
de Broglie 9, 343-352
[Kyritsis K. 2016] Ordinal Real Numbers 1,2,3,4,5 . Proceedings of
the 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
QUANTITATIVE, SOCIAL, BIOMEDICAL AND ECONOMIC
ISSUES 2017 - ICQSBEI 2017 ,ATHENS pp222-281
https://books.google.gr/books?id=BSUsDwAAQBAJ&pghttp://cris.
teiep.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/1501 It is an alternative way to
define the continuum of the surreal numbers after the infinite
ordinals as by J. H. Conway.
[Kyritsis K. 2017 a] On the 4 th Clay millennium problem: Proof of
the regularity of the solutions of the Euler and Navier-Stokes
equations, based on the conservation of particles. Journal of
Scientific Research and Studies Vol. 4(11), pp. 304-317, November,
2017 http://www.modernrespub.org/jsrs/content/2017/November.
htm
[Kyritsis K. 2017b] An Axiomatic System for a Physical or Digital
but Continuous 3-Dimensional Euclidean Geometry, Without
Infinite Many Points. World Journal of Research and
Review (WJRR) ISSN:2455-3956, Volume-5, Issue-4, October

88
 2017 Pages 31-43
http://cris.teiep.gr/jspui/handle/123456789/1590?locale=el It is a
new axiomatic system for the digital Euclidean geometry.
[Kyritsis K. 2018 a] The solutions of the 3rd and 4th Clay
Millennium problems. https://arxiv.org/abs/1902.07265 synthetic
(not-analytic) Euclidean geometry.
[Kyritsis K. 2018 b] THE SOLUTION OF THE 3 RD CLAY
MILLENNIUM PROBLEM. A SHORT PROOF THAT P not equal
to NP = EXPTIME IN THE CONTEXT OF ZERMELO-
FRANKEL SET THEORY. International Journal of Pure and
Applied Mathematics VOL 120(3):497-510. January
2018 DOI: 10.12732/ijpam.v120i3.17 https://ijpam.eu/contents/20
18-120-3/17/17.pdf It is the solution of the famous 3rd Millennium
problem, one of the 7 most difficult unsolved problems of the
21st century. It refers to if the complexity level of non-deterministic
polynomial time , and it is proved that it cannot be reduced to
polynomial time but it is exponential time. This verifies that the
standard methods of encryption and security in the internet are safe.
[Kyritsis K. 2019 ] An Introduction to the Natural Differential and
Integral Calculus, without the Infinite. Journal of Regional &
Socio-Economic Issues . Oct2019, Vol. 9 Issue 3,p70-
89.20p. http://www.jrsei.yolasite.com/ It is an article and a
preliminary version of a future detailed book on digital calculus.
[Kyritsis K. 2021 ] “The Solutions of the 3rd and 4th Millennium
Mathematical Problems. The solutions of the Millennium
Problem P vs NP in computational complexity and the Millennium
problem in fluid dynamics” LAP Lambert Academic Publishing
( 2021-11-25 ) SBN-13: 978-620-4-72562-8
[Kyritsis K. 2022 ] THE NEWTON-LEIBNIZ SURREAL NUMBER-FIELDS OF
FLUXIONS AND INFINITESIMALS AND THE NEW APPLIED DEMOCRITUS
DIGITAL CALCULUS OF THE 21ST CENTURY.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358425683_THE_NEWTON-LEIBNIZ_NUMBER-
FIELDS_OF_FLUXIONS_AND_INFINITESIMALS_AND_THE_NEW_APPLIED_DEMOCRITUS_DIGIT
AL_CA
LCULUS_OF_THE_21ST_CENTURY_A_partial_similarity_of_theory_and_practice_captured_as
_insta nces_of

89
[Landau L. & Lifshitz E. (1970)] Theorie des Chapms Editions
MIR Moscow 1970
[Lorentz gauge condition]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorenz_gauge_condition
[Lindemann , Peter D.Sc.]“The free Energy Secrets of Cold
Electricity” . Published by Clear Tech, Inc.PO Box 37 , Metaline
Falls,WA 99153 (509) 446-2353.

[Lorentz. H. A.] "Electromagnetic phenomena in a system moving

with any velocity less than that of light" Proceedings of the
Academy of sciences if Amsterdam, 6, 1904

[Lorentz force] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_force

[Lorentz group] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lorentz_group

[Magnus effect] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnus_effect

[Magnetic vector potential]

ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_vector_potential

[Majda, A.J. and Bertozzi, A.L. (2002)] Vorticity and Incompressible

Flow. University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511613203

[Maxwell’s equations]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maxwell%27s_equations

[Meyl Konstantin 2000] Free energy in the Tesla towers and

electromagnetic scalar waves
http://www.meyl.eu/go/index.php?dir=50_Experimental&page=
1&sublevel=0
[Michelson-Gale-Pearson-experiment]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson%E2%80%93Gale%E2%80
%93Pearson_experiment
[Michelson-Morley-experiment]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson-
Morley_experiment

90
[Misner C.W.,Thorn K.S Wheeler J.A.] Gravitation Freeman
W.H.1973

[ Mizuno Tadahiko] (Hokkaido University) Free energy from high

voltage water electrolysis Japanese Journal of applied physics
http://www.lenrcanr.org/acrobat/MizunoThydrogenev.pdf

[Moebius group]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M%C3%B6bius_transformation#Ove
rview

[Navier-Stokes equation]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navier%E2%80%93Stokes_equation
s

[Neumann J.v. 2018] The mathematical foundation of quantum

mechanics Princeton University press 2018 .

[Nobel prize 2022] https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/

[Poisson equation]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson%27s_equation

[Rayleigh-Brace-experiment]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experiments_of_Rayleigh_and_Brace
[Reed Donald] Beltrami vector fields in Electrodynamics: A reason
for re-examining The structural foundations of classical field
physics? Modern Nonlinear Optics, Part 3, Second Edition:
Advances in Chemical Physics, Volume 119.
Edited by Myron W. Evans. Series Editors: I. Prigogine and Stuart A.
Rice. Copyright #
2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ISBNs: 0-471-38932-3 (Hardback); 0-
471-23149-5

91
[ Rindler W. 1960] The special theory of relativity , Oliver & Boyd Ltd,
Edinburgh 1960

[Rowe MA, et al. (February 2001)]. "Experimental violation of a Bell's

Inequality with efficient detection". Nature. 409 (6822): 791–
794. Bibcode:2001Natur.409..791K. doi:10.1038/35057215. hdl:2
027.42/62731. PMID 11236986.
[Sagnac effect] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagnac_effect

[Searl J effect] https://www.scribd.com/doc/176616502/Searl-Effect-

Generator-Leaked University of Sussex.

[Shalm, LK, et al. (December 2015).] "Strong Loophole-Free Test of

Local Realism". Physical Review Letters. 115 (25):
250402. arXiv:1511.03189. Bibcode:2015PhRvL.115y0402S. doi:1
0.1103/PhysRevLett.115.250402. PMC 5815856. PMID 26722906.
[Shroendinger equation 1925]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%C3%B6dinger_equation
[ Schroedinger Ε. 1961] Science and Humanism Cambridge University
press 1961
[Speed_of_light] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light

[Speed_of_sound] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_sound
[Tesla Nikola] My Life my Research. Discovery Publisher 2015

[Tewari P. ] https://www.tewari.org/
[Trouton-Noble experiment] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouton-
Noble_experiment
[Wave_equation] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wave_equation

[ Weinberg S 1972] . Gravitation and Cosmology , John Wiley Inc.

N.Y.

[Weyl Hermann 1952] SPACE-TIME-MATTER Dover publications

[Wimshurts machine] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wimshurst_machine

92
[ Woods, L. C.] The Thermodynamics of Fluid Systems Clarendon Press
Oxford 1975.

93