International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)

Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

“Comparative Study of Net Zero Energy Building”

Abhijeet Walunj1, Nikhil Sonawane2, Karan Borhade3 , Suraj
Nalawade4 , Asst Prof. Kavita Bhurke5
1,2,3,4 Students of Department of Civil Engineering, DR. D. Y. Patil Institute of Engineering Management and
Research, Pune Maharashtra
5 Asst Prof. Kavita Bhurke of Department of Civil Engineering, DR. D. Y. Patil institute of Engineering
Managementand Research, Pune Maharashtra

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submitted: 10-07-2021 Revised: 23-07-2021 Accepted: 26-07-2021
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABSTRACT - One of the great option is to outlook high efficiency windows and insulation, and solar
on energy production and consumption. People cannot panels. The idea of net zero energy building is getting
keep up with the exponential growing population by popular globally. However, popularity about the sub-
only becoming energy efficient. The best way to create ject is not the main concern right now. Most of the
energy is to not use it we can solve the problem by industries are considering sources only for today’s
reducing or eliminating our energy demand from the comfortable lifestyle. Industries are refraining to take
electrical grid. The answer to solving the energy crisis a part in this new concept, but it is the prime need for
is net zero energy. Building sector consumes more sustainable buildings in the future. Building industries
energy than all the forms of the transportation com- are slow pacers compared to other industries and they
bined. A net zero energy building is a facility that are heavy consumers of energy. Our population is in-
consumes zero energy on a yearly basis. That means creasing exponentially and to provide them good ser-
building generates no more energy than it can generate vices, amenities overall a good sustainable lifestyle in
itself via on site renewable energy sources. Exponential today’s world renewable and mostly non-renewable
growth of residential buildings is matter of concern. energy is being used and wasted at the same time by
Housing stock consumes around 40% of energy con- the entire requirement from world out there. The next
sumption among other sectors. Indian buildings are decade is expecting to witness massive volumes of
silent energy guzzlers. They account for 35% of India’s building constructions, which will further also escalate
overall power consumption and generate a significant the energy consumption. While there is a strong poli-
amount of greenhouse gases. Because of ev- cy-push towards the adoption of renewable energy
er-increasing population and urbanization, the con- technologies such as rooftop solar photovoltaics
struction (and energy consumption) of buildings has (RTPV), the potential for making zero energy build-
seen a rampant rise. This study aims to analyze the ings has not been explored extensively - even though
impact of energy saving methods on a regular residen- experiments across the world (and India) have shown
tial household building. To minimize the excessive the possibility. NZEBs have lower energy demand
energy and cost consumed in the form of maintenance than that of conventional buildings and produce at
and operation of building equipment used to provide least as much energy as they consume in a year,
services and amenities after the completion of building through onsite renewable energy technologies. NZEBs
almost to zero, various effective methods have been are commonly grid-connected to save battery costs.
used to nullify the energy consumption and cost of the This allows them to draw electricity at night and dur-
building within the construction cost and planning or ing cloudy days, and return an equivalent amount of
designing of building electricity to the local grid on sunny days. Thus, it
Keywords zero energy building , renewable energy , nullifies the net carbon emissions from buildings.
energy building , embodied energy
II. OBJECTIVES OF THE PROJECT
I. INTRODUCTION 1. To identify the cost and charge of different
A Zero energy building, also known as a energy input.
net zero energy building, is a building with net zero 2. To examine the effective energy management.
energy consumption, meaning the total amount of 3. Implementation of procedures for realization of
energy used by the building on an annual basis is saving costs.
equal to the amount of renewable energy created on 4. To compare net zero energy building with con-
the site or in other definitions by renewable energy ventional building.
sources offsite, using technology such as heat pumps,
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2972
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

5. To study and recognize the scope of net zero

energy building.  Net Zero Energy Buildings
Prof. Karsten Voss University Wuppertal,
III. LITERATURE REVIEW Department Architecture, Building Physics and Tech-
 Concept Project of Zero Energy Building nical Services.
Elena Perlova, Mariia Platonova, Alexandr This study explains in brief knowledge (Ba-
Gorshkov, Xenyiya Rakova sics) about Net Zero Energy Buildings. They have
This project study want us to grab attention to the explained the concept behind NZEB, how does it
problem causing global climate change effects. Acute works, by showing and comparing statistical graphs
problem of carbon dioxide emissions reduction into about consumption of energy by the building by tradi-
the atmosphere becomes more important due to the tional methods and by the renewable energy methods.
fact of global climatic change. According to the vari- They tried to focus on long-term results of
ous estimates housing stock consumes over 30-40 % c0nventional methods or initial investment of various
of total energy resources. And to neutralize this green energy related material equipment in the build-
drastic consumption of energy towards building in- ing such as use of PV panels (solar roof) , floor hea-
dustries. They have also discussed about prospects for ters.
the construction of a building with low energy con-
sumption in Russian atmosphere. And constructive IV. METHODOLOGY
solutions and insulation as per requirement. They have 4.1 Using cost efficient solar panel system and its
produced series of studies. It corresponds to identify- cost saving calculations to gain a long-term results.
ing and practical application of a body architectural One of the biggest reasons to go a solar is
and planning solutions to reduce the heat loss through that you eliminate or significantly reduce your light
the building of the building envelope. energy bill.
Going solar can eliminate your electric bill or
 Net Zero Energy Buildings: Expense or In- reduce dramatically that electricity costs are no longer
vestment significant factor in your budget. Your savings with
R.S.Adhikari, N.Aste, C.Del Pero and M.Manfren solar depend on a few factors, like how much energy
This study wants to conclude whether Net your system produces and how much you consume,
zero energy buildings are way to expensive or is it a but the biggest factor is the rates you would pay to
good investment in long-term results. The authors of your utility. Because your savings are equal to the
this paper also involved the roles of different renewa- costs you avoid by going solar, you will save even
ble assets and compared them with non conventional more electricity rates are high in your area. Moreover,
or non renewable equipment (Traditional method) get since electricity prices will continue to rise, your sav-
the best results. For practical evaluation of results, ings will continue to grow every year over the 25+
they also worked on a case study on a building of area year lifespan of your solar panel system. Reducing
about 7000 mtr.sq During the design phase, different one of your largest monthly expenses makes perfect
evaluations have been made about building envelope sense, but the benefits of solar are not just economic.
in order to minimize thermal energy demand in both Because electricity prices can be unpredictable, they
winter and summer. A technical-economic analysis of make managing your budget difficult. By installing a
the ZEB case study was carried out in the present solar panel system, you also fix your electricity costs
work. It must be noted that applied energy perfor- and make them more predictable. This is especially
mances are lower than estimated ones, but corres- beneficial for anyone with a fixed income, as well as
ponding to an average of efficient buildings. It can be for business who predictable by going solar, you also
assumed that the results of this study are conservative improve your expense forecasting and management
compared to those actually achievable, but precisely capabilities.
for this reason, more reliable.

4.1.1 Following table represents energy power consumption by typical home appliances for a 1 BHK apartment
Sr Name of Rating of No. of
no. Equipment equipment installed
(watt) equipment
1 Tube light 35 4
2 LED bulb 15 4
3 Fan 70 3
4 Fridge 200 1

DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2973
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

5 Laptop 50 1
6 LED TV 70 1
7 Geyser 1000 1
8 Washing 500 1
machine
9 Oven 1500 1

Total energy No. of oper- Total energy

(watt) ating hours consumption
(kW)
140 5 0.140
60 4 0.060
210 10 0.210
200 12 0.200
50 4 0.050
70 3 0.070
1000 1 1
500 1 0.5
1500 1 1.5

4.1.2 Conversion of total energy consumption from Kw into kWh.

Conversion formula of energy consumption from kW to kWh as follows :
Energy produced in kW X No of hours = Energy produced in unit or kWh
Energy in kWh X No of days equip. used = Energy produced in unit or KWh

Similarly, by calculation we obtained –

Sr Total energy No of days Total energy

no consumption equipment consumption
usage (kWh)
1 Tube light 28 15.68
2 LED bulb 28 3.36
3 Fan 20 42
4 Fridge 28 67
5 Laptop 20 4
6 LED TV 28 5.88
7 Geyser 20 28
8 Washing 20 10
machine
9 Oven 20 30

4.1.3 Before Solar Energy System 4.1.4 After Solar Energy System
We concluded that 1 apartment consume up to We will need a 40 kW solar panel system, which is
200 kWh of electric energy. That means 30 apartments able to generate upto 5000 kWh per month.
need around 6000 kWh of electrical energy per every That means we only need to pay for remaining 1000
month. Currently the rate of electricity per 1 kWh in kWh that is coming from power grid.
India is 6.5 Rs to 7.30 Rs. Now, if we calculate the cost of this 1000 units of
If we calculate the energy consumption of building for electricity in kWh,
the next 25 years, 1000 x 8 Rs = 8000 Rs per month
6000 kWh x 8 Rs = 48000 Rs monthly cost 8000 x 25 years = 24,00,000 Rs
48000 Rs x 12 months = 576000 Rs Annually cost
576000 Rs x 25 years = 1,44,00,000 Rs 4.1.5 Cost and Maintenance of solar system

DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2974
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

 The timely and regular cleaning of solar 4.1.6 Cost saving :

cells and PV panels. Before solar system the cost is 1,44,00,000 Rs
 Regular maintenance of all thermal-based com- After solar system the cost is 24,00,000 Rs
ponents. The cost of solar system is 32,00,000 Rs
 Servicing of HT side equipment on an annual From all the observation and calculations, we saved
basis. 5000 kWh energy per month . That means the total
 Diagnosis and tests pertaining to low solar energy saved is worth of 88,00,000 Rs
power production.
This will add up to a cost of maintenance per 1 kW is 4.2 Water Management System
1000-1400 Rs (Avg - 1100) And it need to be done on Net zero water building has been achieved when the
specific regular time interval let say every 8-9 months. amount of alternative water consumption and water
So, the total cost of the operation and maintenance of returned to the original water source is equivalent to
solar system for 25 years will be, the building’s water consumption
1100 x 40 = 44000 Rs for every 10-12 months
44000 x 25 = 14,52,000 Rs (Approx = 15,00,000 Rs) Objectives of Net Zero Water Building
The cost of on grid 40 kW solar panel system is  Minimize total water consumption.
17,00,000 including the subsidiary from govt.  Maximize alternative water sources
The total cost of the system will be 17,00,000 +  Minimize wastewater discharge from the build-
15,00,000 = 32,00,000 Rs ing & return water to the original water source.

TERM DEFINITION
Alternative Wa- A sustainable water source not
ter derived from fresh, surface or
groundwater source.
Alternative water includes:
 Harvested rainwater,
storm water, sump-pump water.
 Graywater
 Rejected water from water
purification systems.
 Reclaimed wastewater
A net zero water building uses
alternative water sources to
offset the use of freshwater.
Freshwater Water sourced from surface or
groundwater such as lakes &
rivers.
Original water Surface water & groundwater
source sources that are within the same
local watershed and aquifer of
the building.
Water Returned The amount of water collected
from the building systems such
as green infrastructure & on
site treated wastewater, which
is returned to the original water
source.

Total Annual Water Use = Total Annual Alternative such as potable, non potable Including fresh water &
Water Use + Total Annual Water Returned alternative water.
Total Water Use = It is the amount of water consumed Alternative Water Use = It is the amount of water
within the boundaries Of a building from all sources consumed from alternate Sources such as harvested
rainwater, graywater, reclaimed wastewater etc.
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2975
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

Water Returned = Amount of water collected from original water source.

the on site treated waste water and returned back to the

PURPOSE Amount of Water in Lit/Day

for 1 Flat
Bath 125
Laundry 50
Toilets 100
Dish Washers 30
Cook 10
Drink 15
Total Usage of 1 Day 330 Litres.
Total Water Consumed 330*30 = 9900 Litres/ Day
For Building

Total Water Usage for 1 Month = 9900*30=2,97,000  Rainwater harvesting is the simple process or
Total Water usage for 1 year = 297000*12= 35,64,000 technology used to conserve Rainwater by collecting,
Litres storing, conveying and purifying of Rainwater that
runs off from roof of the building for later use.
 The rainwater harvesting system is one of the
4.2.1 Sewage Treatment Plant best methods practised and followed to support the
Sewage Treatment Plant can be conservation of water.
 Open Unit Today, scarcity of good quality water has become a
 Partially Sealed Unit significant cause of concern. However, Rainwater,
 Fully Sealed Unit which is pure and of good quality, can be used for
For our residential building, We recommend com- irrigation, washing, cleaning, bathing, cooking and
pletely sealed package unit also for other livestock requirements.
4.2.2 Grey Water Treatment Plant. 4.2.4 Total Quantity of Water collected in rain wa-
 Grey water can be defined as any domestic ter harvesting
wastewater produced, excluding sewage. Total Water collected (m3) = Roof top area X average
 The main difference between grey water and monsoon rainfall (m) X 0.8
sewage (or black water) is the organic loading. Sew- = 560*0.4*0.8
age has a much larger organic loading compared to =179.2 m3
grey water. =1,79,200 Litre
4.2.3 Rain Water Harvesting

DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2976
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

4.2.5 Water Returned from Grey water treatment Plant

Sources Usage

Bath 125

Laundry 50

Dish washers 30

Total Grey Water discharge to GWT = 205 litres

10% wastage = 20.5 Litres
Treated Water from GWT= 205-20.5
= 185 lit
Water Returned from GWT to original Source = 185 Litres/day
Total Building ( for 30 flats) = 5550 Litres/day

4.2.6 Water treated in STP

Source Usage

Toilet 100

Black water discharge (Toilets) To STP = 100 Litres/day

10 % wastage(Sludge) = 10 litres
Treated Water from STP = 100-10
= 90 litres/day

4.2.7 Water Discharge from STP to ground water = 90 Litres/day

Total Building (for 30 Flats)= 90*30
= 2700 litres/day

Alternative Water Returned To Original Wa-

Water Source ter Source

Daily Monthly Annually

Harvested - - 1,79,200
Rainwater

Grey Water 5550 166500 19,98,000

From STP 2700 81000 9,72,000

31,49,200
litres

DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2977
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

Water Returned From Alternative Water Source of the most fundamental parts of the construction that
= 31,49,200 Litres have placed 9 native plant species in California. Plants
Annual Water Usage = 35,64,000 Litres on the roof are equipped with a thermal insulation
4.3 Environmental Dimension layer. Roof has played the role of insulation and
makes building warm in winter and cool in summer
Objectives and prevents more than 405 million pounds of green-
 Reduce energy consumption house gas emissions in a year.
 Reduce noise pollution
 Reduce the temperature of surrounding 4.4 Eco friendly construction materials
 Decreasing air pollution A building's carbon footprint is defined as the
 Reducing green house gases amount of CO2 it produces during its operations and
activities. Considering a building's carbon foot-
4.3.1 Designing methods and the creation of green print is something that affects both new construction
buildings in cities as well as existing buildings.
 Vertical green surfaces or green wall : To minimize the effect of carbon footprint and to
Green wall is a new technology that is now finding avoid the wastage of any materials these eco friendly
itself slowly in contemporary cities of the world. and environment friendly materials are used they are
Green wall is an independent or part of a building as follows :
structure, covered with vegetation. Types of Green  Blended cements
walls from the perspective of implementation, includ-  Compacted fly ash blocks
ing green facades (Green Facades) and indoor and  low energy intensity floor and roofing systems
outdoor living walls (Living Walls) and the green
walls and green walls are classified into two types of Blended Cements
the air purification: active and passive.  These are cements containing a high volume of
 Green facades : one or more complementary cementing materials
Green facades, a green wall in which plants can be (CCM), such as coal fly ash, granulated slag, silica
planted in the ground or in pots brought in height. In fume and reactive rice-husk ash.
traditional green facades or direct climbing, plants are  A large volume of CO2 is directly emitted during
connected directly and without retaining to the wall the cement manufacturing process (0.9 tonnes/tonne
and go up. Two shells green facades are indirectly of clinker). Reduction in the quantity of clinker by
attached to the wall by means of a support structures. substituting with CCM results in lesser
Scaffold structure of this type can be made of different CO2 emissions.
sorts, such as wood, metal or mesh network  There is a considerable amount of ongoing R&D
 Interior and exterior living wall in the direction of using CCM in Portland cements and
Living walls are a combination of panels with vegeta- up to 40% substitution by CCM is possible.
tion and those are mounted vertically by a structural  CO2 emissions from cement/concrete industry to
lightweight system, narrowly to the building facades reduce drastically by 2030. CO2 emissions will be at
and are self supporting. Living wall can be used in 940 × 106 tonnes by 2030, which is same as that for
interior and exterior of building. Box systems, are the year 1990 though there will be a considerable in-
modules that are placed as place of plant growth in crease in the total volume of concrete consumed.
metal support frame and has the ability to separate
from the wall or replaced to change the mod. In the Compacted fly ash blocks
system of industrial felt roots are placed between the  A mixture of lime, fly ash and stone crusher dust
fiber and food and water go through woven layers of can be compacted into a high-density block. Lime
plants. The system is suitable for dry weather. reacts with fly ash minerals forming water insoluble
bonds imparting strength to the block.
 These reactions are slow at ambient temperatures
4.3.2 A Case Study of green buildings and their (∼30°C) and can be accelerated by either
impact on energy efficiency- low-temperature steam curing or by using additives
California Academy of Sciences like phospho-gypsum (an industrial waste product).
The Academy is designed in 2008 by the  Block strength depends upon the composition of
famous Piano Italian architect Renzo and constructed the mix, density and percentage of stabilizer/additives.
from recycled materials. The index features is res- Some advantages of the technology are: (a) decentra-
pecting the environment and the site and the applica- lized production in tiny scale industries, (b) utilization
tion of solar cells. Its basic design has reduced energy
consumption by 30 to 35 percent. Green roofs are one
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2978
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

of industrial waste products and (c) energy efficient rently used methods of construction were discussed in
and environment friendly. detail.
 The analysis shows that embodied energy of
Low energy intensity floor and roofing systems buildings using the low-energy materials and tech-
 Floor and roofing systems are an assembly of niques results in 50% savings in total embodied ener-
two or more building materials or products. For ex- gy. There is a large potential and scope for utilizing
ample the most commonly used reinforced concrete the industrial and mine solid wastes for the manufac-
(RC) slab is made up of reinforcing steel, concrete and ture of building materials for promoting sustainable
other non-structural elements like floor finish, render- construction practices.
ings and paints.
 Energy intensity of RC slab arises from the VI. CONCLUSION
energy intensity of its various component materials. The net zero-energy concept offers an ambitious sce-
 Composite masonry jack-arch roof or floor sys- nario in which energy efficiency and the use of re-
tem, RC filler slab, unreinforced masonry vaults, etc. newable energy sources are combined.
represent some of the low energy intensity options for The Net zero water concepts present a new vision and
floor and roof slabs it is now becoming a practical & technologically
feasible for a wide variety of water reuse applications.
V. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS While making a home net zero energy might have a
Solar energy : slightly upfront cost the long term cost is going to be
 It is not so much a matter of achieving net ze- lower as you will be producing your own power
ro-energy buildings on the short term, but of formu-
lating a goal and reducing the distance from this goal REFERENCES
on a broad basis by measures applied to buildings and [1]. A.S. Fidrikova, O.S. Grishina, A.P. Marichev,
supply grids. X.M. Rakova, Energy-efficient technologies in
 Apart considering from the annual balance, it is the construction of school in hot climates, Ap-
important to achieve optimal matching in time be- plied Mechanics and Materials 587-589 (2014) pp.
tween feeding in electricity and drawing it from the 287-293.
grid. Passive houses with their high energy efficiency [2]. Z.A. Gaevskaya, X.M. Rakova, Modern building
reduce the demands on the seasonal compensation materials and the concept of "sustainability
effect of electricity grids. project", Advanced Materials Research 941-944
Water Management system : (2014) pp. 825-830.
 So here now, as we studied earlier that In net [3]. N.S. Bolshakov, S.A. Krivoy, X.M. Rakova, The
zero energy building the total annual alternative water "comfort in all respects" principle implementation
use nearly offsets the Total annual water use by the example of an elementary school, Ad-
 Water saving should be managed efficiently to vanced Materials Research.
control the waste water throughout the building from [4]. A.S. Gorshkov, Energoeffektivnost v stroitelstve:
GWT & STP. voprosy normirovaniya i mery po snizheniyu
energopotrebleniya zdaniy (Energy efficiency in
Environmental dimensions : buildings: the valuation issues and measures to
 By creating green buildings, we can take a big reduce energy consumption of buildings), Inzhe-
step towards urban sustainability and optimizing nerno-stroitelnyy zhurnal (Magazine of Civil En-
energy consumption. Design and construction of these gineering) 1 (2010) pp. 9-13.
buildings is possible with four overall method green [5]. A.S. Gorshkov, D.V. Nemova, P.P. Rymkevich,
views, indoor and outdoor living walls, green walls Ekonomim ili net? Rossiyskiye energosbere-
and green roofs area. gayushchiye trebovaniya(Save or not? Russian
 In the planning of most cities in the developed energy saving requirements), Energosberezheniye
world to create green spaces in the building have been 2 (2014) pp. 26-32.
implemented as a recipe in the building and in Iran by [6]. Wei Li, Jinzhong Zhu, Zhimin Zhu, The Ener-
using various methods trying to increase green space gy-saving Benefit Evaluation Methods of the Grid
on the existing building and build them on buildings Construction Project Based on Life Cycle Cost
under construction. Theory, Energy Procedia 17(A) (2012) pp.
227–232.
Construction materials : [7]. “Built Expression Bangalore: Net Zero Energy
Building”.
 Certain issues concerning embodied energy in
[8]. Kapoor, R., et al. (2011). "Strategy roadmap for
buildings, carbon emissions and sustainability of cur-
net zero energy buildings in India." USAID India,
DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2979
 International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Management (IJAEM)
Volume 3, Issue 7 July 2021, pp: 2972-2980 www.ijaem.net ISSN: 2395-5252

http://eco3.
org/wp-content/plugins/downloads-manager/uplo
ad/NZEB percent20 Roadmap-2 percent20Sept
percent 20: 2011.
[9]. General Aspects of Energy management and
Energy audit, Energy efficiency in electrical utili-
ties, Bureau of energy efficiency,chapter3,
54.https://beeindia.gov.in/sites/default/files/1Ch3.
pdf

DOI: 10.35629/5252-030729722980 Impact Factor value 7.429 | ISO 9001: 2008 Certified Journal Page 2980