The document outlines the course structure for Structural Engineering. It includes details like total marks distribution, topics to be covered like stiffness methods for analysis of trusses, beams and frames, pre-stressed concrete, structural dynamics and earthquake loads. It also lists some relevant textbooks and discusses course learning outcomes and program learning outcomes. A review section compares classical analysis methods to matrix methods and finite element methods. Common structural elements like trusses, beams, frames and their characteristics are also summarized.
The document outlines the course structure for Structural Engineering. It includes details like total marks distribution, topics to be covered like stiffness methods for analysis of trusses, beams and frames, pre-stressed concrete, structural dynamics and earthquake loads. It also lists some relevant textbooks and discusses course learning outcomes and program learning outcomes. A review section compares classical analysis methods to matrix methods and finite element methods. Common structural elements like trusses, beams, frames and their characteristics are also summarized.
• MID MARKS (30+10) • END SEMESTER MARKS (40+10) • ATTENDANCE MARKS (10)
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif
Structural Engineering-COURSE OUTLINE • Stiffness method for analysis trusses • Stiffness method for analysis of beams Dr. Asif
• Stiffness method for analysis of frames
• Pre-stressed Concrete • Structural dynamics Dr. Burhan • Application of earthquake loads
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 2
Structural Engineering (Books)
R.C. Hibbler R.C. Hibbler Mario Paz
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 3
Structural Engineering (Books)
Arthur H. Nilson Arthur H. Nilson
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 4 Structural Engineering (Books)
Anil K. Chopra James C. Anderson Joseph E. Tedesco
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 5
Structural Engineering • THE FINITE ELEMENT METHOD BY O.C. ZEINKIEWICZ
• COMPUTATIONAL METHOD FOR THE
SOLUTION OF ENGINEERING PROBLEMS BY BREBBIA (USED IN LAB PORTION)
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 6
Course Learing Outcome (CLO’s) Bloom’s Sr. No. Objective PLO Taxonomy Level To analyze trusses, beams and 1 frames using matrix methods of 2 C4 structural analysis. To analyze the structures for 2 dynamic and earthquake loading . 2 C4 To comprehend the use of pre- 3 stressing in concrete bridges. 3 C2
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 7
Program Learning out come (PLO) PLO Description PLO Description
1 Engineering Knowledge 7 Environment and
Sustainability 2 Problem Analysis 8 Ethics
3 Design / Development of 9 Individual and Team work
solution 4 Investigation 10 Communication
5 Modern tool usage 11 Project Management
6 The Engineers and 12 Life long Learning
Society
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 8
Review • Structural Analysis (5th Semester) has covered the following topics (Statically Ind. Strs.) so far: • Force Method • Moment Distribution Method • Slope Deflection Method • Plastic analysis • Three moment equation
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 9
Review • Structural Analysis is an integral part of structural Engineering. • It is the process of predicting the performance of a given structure under a prescribed loading. • The performance characteristics which are of interest to the structural Engineer is: • Stresses due to (axial forces, shear or moments) • Deflections • Support reactions Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 10 Review • Most design offices today used the software’s but the main objective of this subject is to understand the solution of framed structures using matrix approach which is also basis of all the available structural analysis and design software's.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 11
Review • Classical vs Matrix Method • Both methods are based on the same fundamental principles but the fundamental relationships of equilibrium, compatibility and member stiffness are now expressed in the form of matrix equations so that it can be programmed on computer.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 12
Review • Classical vs Matrix Method • Most classical methods were developed to analyze particular types of structure and since they were intended for hand calculations. For e.g. MDM used only to analyze beams and plane frames under going bending deformations. • Matrix method are systematic and can be easily programmed.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 13
Review • Classical vs Matrix Method • In case of analysis of large structures, classical methods are very time consuming, however with the use of matrix method it becomes feasible to analyze such structures.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 14
Review • Classical vs Matrix Method • Classical methods may also be used for preliminary designs for checking the results of computerized analysis. • A study of classical methods is considered to be essential for developing and understanding the structural behavior.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 15
Review(Comparison side by side) Stiffness Method Flexibility Method
1. Stiffness method uses matrices 1. This method may use matrices
right from the start. but after some manual calculations. 2. Stiffness method has a similar procedure both for statically 2. Flexibility method has a different determinate and indeterminate procedure both for statically structures. determinate and indeterminate structures. 3. Stiffness method generates forces and displacements 3. This method does not generate directly. the forces and displacements directly. 4. Stiffness method can be easily programmed for computers. 4. This method cannot be easily programmed for computers.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 16
Review • Matrix Method vs Finite Element method • Matrix method can be used to analyze frame structures only. • FEM which originated as an extension of matrix analysis is used for analysis of plates and shells and now developed to such an extent that it is applicable to solids of practically any shape or form.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 17
Review • Matrix Method vs Finite Element method • The basic difference b/w two is, In matrix method the member force relation ship is based on exact solutions of the underlying differential equations however in FEM they are based on assume displacement or stress function (Material behavior and their Stress–Strain relationship). • Within elastic range both methods gives same solution.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 18
Review (Framed Structures) • Plane Truss • A truss is defined as assemblage of straight members connected at their end by flexible connections, and subjected to loads and reactions only at the joints. • The member of such and ideal truss develop only axial forces when the truss is loaded.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 19
Review (Framed Structures) • Plane Truss • Due to the deviation of the idealized conditions, trusses are also subjected to secondary bending moments and shears comparably very small in comparison to axial forces. • If large bending moments are to be anticipated then it shall be designed as a rigid frame for analysis and design.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 20
Review (Framed Structures) • Plane Truss • If all the members of the truss as well as loads lie in a single plane, it is called plane truss. • The analysis of plane truss is simpler than space truss. • Majority of our trusses are plane trusses used in buildings, bridges or used as roof truss.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 21
Review (Framed Structures) • Beam • A beam is defined as a long straight structure that is loaded perpendicular to its longitudinal axis. Loads are usually applied in a plane of symmetry of the Beam X- Section, causing its members to be subjected only to bending moments and shear forces.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 22
Review (Framed Structures) • Plane Frames • Frames also called rigid frames are composed of straight members connected by rigid (moment resisting) or flexible connections. • In frames loads may be applied on joints or on members • If all the members of the frame lie in single plane is called plane frame and they may be subjected to bending moments shears and axial forces. Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 23 Review (Framed Structures) • Space Trusses • For transmission towers and certain aerospace structures plane trusses cannot be used. Such structures are called space structures. • They are 3D structures with loading in three directions. • Like plane trusses space trusses also develop axial forces. Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 24 Review (Framed Structures) • Grids • A grid, like a plane frame is composed of straight members connected together by rigid or flexible connections to form a plane frame work. • The load on the grid is applied perpendicular to structure plane therefore being subjected to torsional moments along with bending moments and shears.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 25
Review (Framed Structures) • Grids • Grids are commonly used to for supporting roofs covering large column free areas in such structures as sports arenas, auditoriums and aircraft hangers.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 26
Review (Framed Structures) • Space Frames • 3D frame structure is called space frames having forces applied in all directions. (All high rise buildings, Domes etc)
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 27
Review (Framed Structures) • Equilibrium Conditions • Equilibrium conditions for both 2D and 3D structures are shown as follows.
Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 28
Review (Framed Structures) • Compatibility Conditions • It relate the deformation of a structure so that its various parts (Member, joints , and supports) fit together. • These are also called continuity conditions. • Consider this frame. • Vertical dispalcement at joint 1 is zero. • Vertical and hz disp. At joint 3 is zero Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 29 Review (Framed Structures) • Compatibility Conditions • d1 must be equal to d2 • Theta 2 must be same for hz member-1 and vertical member-2 • Member 2 and joint 3 will not rotate as it is fixed. • Finally compatibility requires that the deflected shapes of the members of the structures must be continuous and consistent with the displacement at the ends of the member. Structural Engineering by Dr. M. Burhan Sharif 30 Review (Degree of Indeterminacy) • Following formula’s are used to determine the indeterminacy of the structure.
Design of Reinforced Concrete Pipe Author(s) : R. E. Morris, Jr. Source: Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), Apr., 1966, Vol. 38, No. 4 (Apr., 1966), Pp. 531-543 Published By: Wiley
Design of Reinforced Concrete Pipe Author(s) : R. E. Morris, Jr. Source: Journal (Water Pollution Control Federation), Apr., 1966, Vol. 38, No. 4 (Apr., 1966), Pp. 531-543 Published By: Wiley