Theoretical Frameworks
Theoretical Frameworks
Theoretical Framework
Holds that individuals have certain rights–such as the rights to life, liberty, and
conventions. The idea of natural rights reaches far back in the history of philosophy and
legal thought. Arguably, it was already recognized in nascent form by ancient Greek
thinkers such as Aristotle in the fourth century B.C., who argued that citizens who are
equal by nature have the same natural right (that is, just claim) to political office
(Politics III.16.1287a8–14). During the Middle Ages, the concept of natural rights began
and theologians entered a heated debate over the status of individual property rights,
with some contending that the property right was natural and others that it was merely
conventional (Natural Rights Liberalism from Locke to Nozick). According to the doctrine
of natural rights, human rights are inherent and unalienable, which means that no
government or person can restrict or deny them. It is believed that these rights are
derived from the natural order of things or humanity's fundamental essence. The
justice. In this context, it is believed that human rights are intrinsic to each person and
need to be protected by the state. Liberals contend that a society where the rule of law
is upheld, and everyone is given equal protection and treatment under the law is a just
society.
2. Utilitarianism Theory
choice is the one that will produce the greatest good for the greatest number. It is the
only moral framework that can be used to justify military force or war. It is also the most
common approach to moral reasoning used in business because of how it accounts for
costs and benefits. Utilitarianism also has trouble accounting for values such as justice
and individual rights. For example, assume a hospital has four people whose lives
depend upon receiving organ transplants: a heart, lungs, a kidney, and a liver. If a
healthy person wanders into the hospital, his organs could be harvested to save four
lives at the expense of one life. This would arguably produce the greatest good for the
greatest number. But few would consider it an acceptable course of action, let alone the
right and wrong, it has obvious limitations (Ethics Unwrapped). Utilitarian viewpoints
assess deeds according to their total usefulness or impact on the welfare of the
majority. This strategy seeks to reduce suffering and increase happiness within society.
The goal of utilitarianism is to advance the greatest good for the largest possible
number of individuals. Human rights are justified, according to this argument, by their
Marxism is the social and economic theory developed by Karl Marx in the 19th
struggle between workers and employers, which would eventually spark a revolution
that would give the working class more power and establish collective ownership of the
are byproducts of the capitalist system and cannot be fully realized until the system is
overturned and a society devoid of classes is achieved. Marxist views attribute the
underlying causes of social injustice to class conflict and economic institutions. Human
rights are frequently viewed as instruments used by the ruling class to hold onto power,
4. Feminist Theory
issues affecting humanity, calling for the replacement of the presiding patriarchal order
with a system that emphasizes equal rights, justice, and fairness. Liberal feminists cite
libertarian feminists hold that the patriarchal system that oppresses women must be
eliminated and that women should be free to exercise total sexual and reproductive
freedom. Radical cultural feminists urge women to extricate themselves from the
feminists stress the universal interests of women worldwide. Ecofeminists focus on the
connection between humans to the nonhuman world. Feminist theory has impacted
virtually all structures, systems, and disciplines, challenging traditional ontological and
‘femaleness.’ Modern feminism, which began 200 years ago, has evolved in three
waves. The first wave dealt with suffrage; the second centered on equal access; and
the current wave focused on global equality. (R. Tong, in International Encyclopedia of
5. Postcolonialism Theory
Postcolonial theory is a literary theory or critical approach that deals with literature
produced in countries that were once or are now, colonies of other countries. It may
also deal with literature written in or by citizens of colonizing countries that take colonies
or their peoples as its subject matter. The theory is predicated on the ideas of
practitioners as the seminal text of postcolonial theory, which entered the critical toolkit
in the 1970s. Advocates of this thesis usually look at how writers from colonized nations
try to express, even celebrate, their cultural identities and take them back from the
colonizers. They also look at how colonialism is justified in literature by the colonial
provide a unified definition of postcolonial theory have proven difficult, and several
authors have sharply criticized the idea itself. (art.washington.edu). Human rights are
seen through a Eurocentric lens by postcolonial theory, which contends that because
these rights are mostly grounded on Western ideals, they may not fully represent the
Cambridge University Press (July 2010) Natural Rights Liberalism from Locke to Nozick,
Edited by Ellen Franken Paul, Fred D. Miller Jr., and Jeffrey Paul
https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/natural-rights-liberalism-from-locke-to-
nozick/introduction/611FB58FC3621A6875975FD1D3FB38BA
https://ethicsunwrapped.utexas.edu/glossary/utilitarianism#:~:text=Utilitarianism%20is
%20an%20ethical%20theory%20that%20determines%20right%20from%20wrong,good
%20for%20the%20greatest%20number.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/m/marxism.asp#:~:text=Marxism%20is%20the
%20social%20and,represent%20most%20of%20the%20population .
Post-Colonial Literature,
https://art.washington.edu/sites/art/files/documents/about/an_introduction_to_post-
colonialism_post-colonial_theory_and_post-colonial_literature.pdf