A team of German researchers conducted a study to calculate the true cost of foods if environmental impacts were included. They found that meat, especially beef, would be significantly more expensive - a beef steak would cost 146% more. Producing meat causes high emissions that are currently not priced into food costs. The type of food, whether meat or plant-based, has a greater influence on the environment than the production method. Including the environmental costs could encourage many consumers to shift to a more plant-based diet, benefiting both the earth and human health.
A team of German researchers conducted a study to calculate the true cost of foods if environmental impacts were included. They found that meat, especially beef, would be significantly more expensive - a beef steak would cost 146% more. Producing meat causes high emissions that are currently not priced into food costs. The type of food, whether meat or plant-based, has a greater influence on the environment than the production method. Including the environmental costs could encourage many consumers to shift to a more plant-based diet, benefiting both the earth and human health.
A team of German researchers conducted a study to calculate the true cost of foods if environmental impacts were included. They found that meat, especially beef, would be significantly more expensive - a beef steak would cost 146% more. Producing meat causes high emissions that are currently not priced into food costs. The type of food, whether meat or plant-based, has a greater influence on the environment than the production method. Including the environmental costs could encourage many consumers to shift to a more plant-based diet, benefiting both the earth and human health.
A team of German researchers conducted a study to calculate the true cost of foods if environmental impacts were included. They found that meat, especially beef, would be significantly more expensive - a beef steak would cost 146% more. Producing meat causes high emissions that are currently not priced into food costs. The type of food, whether meat or plant-based, has a greater influence on the environment than the production method. Including the environmental costs could encourage many consumers to shift to a more plant-based diet, benefiting both the earth and human health.
study and found out that the major differences are not caused by the cultivating or breeding method, they’re rather caused by the type of food. If we recalculate accurately the price of farmed meat, taking into account the effect on the environment, a simple beef steak would cost 146% more. There’s something positive, if the environmental cost, relative to the food production, is integrated into what we pay for our weekly shopping, it’s likely that a large part of consumer would pass to a vegetable diet and this is good for the earth and their health. This is what is said in the new study, published on Nature Communications. A group of German researchers wanted to show the invisible environmental cost related to the food supply chain: from land use to fertilisers, methane emissions, heating and transportations. In fact, they close the cognitive gap between the effects on the environment and what we eat, translating them into a real economic cost for the consumers. More precisely, they considered the agricultural german contest, focusing on meat products, milk and vegetable, comparing crops and biological livestock with the traditional ones.
Some results were really surprising.
Regarding the impact on the planet, the
emissions caused by the production of meat, make this product the most expensive, followed by dairy products and products of vegetable origin. In general, biological crops and livestock contribute at the decrease of emissions, caused by the production of dairy products and products of plant origin, that make them less harmful for the earth. The reason is that the biological agriculture doesn’t allow the use of nitrogenous mineral fertilisers and this reduce the overall emissions.
But the truly surprising thing is the meat, it
turned out that the emissions caused by biological livestock farming are just as high. That can depend both on the fact that biological farms need more space to satisfy the standard of animal welfare and for the lower yields, two traits that reduce their efficiency.
Regarding emissions, a vital aspect researchers
have noticed is the fact they do not depend on the type of agriculture or breeding practiced, but rather what is produced from. This suggests that the choice of what we eat could have a greater effect on the environment than the way the food is produced.
The environmental impact is only one of the
many aspects they toke care of, they actually wanted to make it tangible for the consumers, translating into an added economic cost. They showed that the meat products coming from traditional farms would cost 150% more if they toke into account the damage to the environment. The price of dairy products should increase of 91%. Compared to the increase of price of biological products plant-based would be barely 6%.