CDP Hinundayan 2023-2028

COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2023 - 2028
Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Title Page No.

Republic of the Philippines

REGION VIII
Province of Southern Leyte
MUNICIPALITY OF HINUNDAYAN
OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR

MESSAGE
Republic Act No. 7160, otherwise known as the Local
Government Code of 1991 mandates each Local Government
Unit to come up with a comprehensive multi-sectoral
development plan. Pursuant to this mandate, and for an
efficient, effective and economical governance the purpose of
which is the general welfare of the municipality and its
inhabitants as provided for under Section 16, the Municipal
Mayor as the Local Chief Executive of the Municipal
Government shall exercise general supervision and control
over all programs, projects, services and activities of the municipal government who shall
direct the formulation of the Municipal Development Plan, with the assistance of the
Municipal Development Council, and upon approval thereof by the Sangguniang Bayan.
At a multi sectoral perspective as well as considering the mandated spatial related plans
and programs, the 2023-2028 Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) of the
Municipality of Hinundayan pave the roadmap to achieve the LGU’S Vision, Goals and
Objectives. It sets out varying strategies to achieve economic advancement thru
agricultural and eco-tourism initiatives that would yield to a multitude of employment,
economic opportunities and development.
This Comprehensive Development Plan for the local government unit of Hinundayan is a
legacy to the people of Hinundayan from the municipal officials, functionaries and
stakeholders who worked together to uplift the lives of every Hinudayanon and make
Hinundayan a better place to live in.
It is with fervent hope that this CDP will be a guiding document for all stakeholders of
LGU-Hinundayan, that if everyone will commit to it, then the dream of every
Hinundayanon of a comfortable, safe and progressive life will be made closer to reality.
Thus, I enjoin everyone in the local government unit of Hinundayan to work hand in hand
in the attainment of this development plan and programs for the ensuing six years.
For indeed, Hinundayan can do!
EVELYN T. LEE, CPA

Municipal Mayor

Republic of the Philippines

REGION VIII
Province of Southern Leyte
MUNICIPALITY OF HINUNDAYAN
OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL VICE MAYOR

MESSAGE
Greetings of peace and goodwill!
The challenges of the changing time and the crises brought
by these changes cannot hamper the LGU’s desire to implement
developmental programs that uplift every Hinundayanon’s way of
life.
This Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) for the next six years 2023-2028
embodies the strong manifestation of the Local Government Unit of Hinundayan thru its
municipal officials and functionaries to stir the municipality into a more develop and
progressive community and a better place to live for its constituents.
Nonetheless, these plans and programs remain as it is and no effect if without the
support and cooperation of each and everyone. Thus, I am ardently imploring the
collaboration of all stakeholders to transform these plans into reality.
For certainly, it is in unity and teamwork that we can attain our goals and realize
our vision to create a better Hinundayan!
EDNA A. RESMA
Municipal Vice Mayor

MDC RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CDP


SANGGUNIANG BAYAN RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CDP


FOREWORD
The Local Government Code of 1991 mandated Local Government Units to have a
comprehensive multi-sectoral development plan, among many other mandated plans.
The Comprehensive Development Plan outlines the challenges and opportunities being
experienced by the municipality as well as the strategies on how to respond to these.
Moreover, the CDP sets the direction for the municipality and spells out the different
strategies that are further expressed into Programs, Projects and Activities to attain its
Vision.
Guided by the newly crafted Vision statement: “A progressive agricultural municipality

and eco-tourism destination in Southern Leyte with God- loving, healthy,
empowered, gender-sensitive & disaster- prepared citizenry living in a safe, well-
conserved & climate change resilient environment under pro-active civil servants”,
this plan embodies Hinundayan’s concrete efforts to define its roadmap for the ensuring
six years (2023-2028). This developmental direction, as summarized by the vision,
underscores the need to maximize the agricultural and eco-tourism potentials of the
municipality with a balanced sustainable development ensuring upliftment of people’s
lives, environmental preservation and building resiliency in the midst of the ever-changing
climate and the essential need for dynamic leadership and good governance.
Furthermore, the Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) is integrated in this

document which reflects the listing of programs and projects with estimated cost and
sources of funds that will serve as a tool in implementing the comprehensive development
plan.
With the stakeholders’ participation, this plan is considered inclusive and responsive to
the needs of all the sectors in the community, thus shall contribute to Hinundayan’s
envisioned holistic progress and development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
This document was prepared through the collaborative efforts of the different
stakeholders, spearheaded by the Local Chief Executive working closely with the
Technical Working Group composed of municipal functionaries from the different LGU
offices. Series of workshops, consultations, dialogues were conducted to gather/validate
data and information which involved municipal officials, department heads and other
stakeholders.
Thus, Acknowledgement, is due to the following whose commitment and participation

have greatly contributed to the realization of this significant document:
• To all the Civil Society Organizations who attended and actively participated in
the workshops conducted in the course of the preparation of this document.
• To the Elected Officials of Hinundayan, headed by Municipal Mayor Evelyn T.
Lee and the Sangguniang Bayan headed by Municipal Vice-Mayor Edna A.
Resma, for their unparalleled support and commitment in the CDP formulation
activities.
• To the municipal department heads and functionaries of Hinundayan, for
providing the needed data and information and participating in focused group
discussion and brain storming activities to attain the different PPAs embodied in
this plan.
• To MLGOO Dennis C. Padolina and the DILG CDP Team for sharing their
expertise and extending technical assistance during the workshops.
• To all the national government personnel in the municipality who actively
participated during the workshops.
• To the Municipal Technical Working Group and CDP Team who painstakingly
worked to consolidate the sectoral outputs, analyze the results, complete the write-
ups and package this document.
And most of all to the Almighty God for His blessings and guidance thru the Holy Spirit,
who is the source of all knowledge and wisdom, we offer this humble work.
To God be all thanks and glory!

CHAPTER II
QUICK FACTS ABOUT THE LGU (include hazard and risk maps)
Brief History
HINUNDAYAN’S HISTORY AND ITS BEGINNINGS
Unwritten history from our ancestors revealed that some years before the coming of the
Spaniards in the Philippines, during the time of Humabon of Cebu and Lapu-Lapu of
Mactan, most of the Southeastern part of Leyte was a wild jungle. The “Bol-anons”,
(people from Bohol) who were known to be the local counterparts of the Chinese in the
field of trading during the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries came to the island of Leyte
using sailboats to carry their inter-island business. They inhabited the place now known
as Hinundayan which was already progressive, engaging in agriculture, fishing and trade
activities. This was manifested by the discovery of old relics along the riverbanks of the
Lungsodaan River. The name “Hinundayan” was derived from an interesting legend
which was unquestioningly accepted by the townspeople.
Long ago, when the Spanish Occupation was at its heights in the country, there was a
group of Spanish soldiers who came to the pueblo in order to determine the peace and
order situation of the place. During such visit, the people were preparing for their fiesta
celebration the following day. The windows of their houses were beautifully decorated
with color-dyed seashells which was customary during those times especially for the well-
off families. The Spaniards were amazed at the display of decorations and asked what
those things meant for. The natives, oblivious to the Spanish language, answered in their
own native tongue, “Ang hinungdan niini dayan-dayan” (the purpose of these is for
decoration). Subsequently, the Spaniards had referred to the place as such. But it was
long and difficult to remember, much to pronounce, so it was shortened to “Hinundayan”.
Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 1

Another historical account was conceived during the workshop on the conceptualization
of the municipality’s festival. It was the old folks present in the workshop who foretold that
the origin of the town’s name came from the word HANDAYANAN, a Visayan word which
literally means a resting place. They narrated that during the reign of the Spaniards in the
country, there were Spanish sailors who by chance arrived at our shores in Sabang. At
that time, the fisherfolks and villagers were very busy setting up “handayanans” or resting
place for their bancas. These are a series of parallel posts with horizontal rails which are
a meter high from the ground where “bangkas”, boats and other sea crafts used by the
locals whether for fishing, transporting people and trading were laid after use. These
handayanans were made by the local folks in order to protect their bancas from the
roaring waves ashore. When the Spanish sailors asked the villagers what was the name
of the place, the villagers who were oblivious of the strange language thought that they
were asked of what they were doing, so they simply answered in their own dialect,
“handayanan among gibuhat para sa among baruto”. The Spaniards noted the first word
HANDAYANAN as the name of the place, so they refer the place as such, which was
later on distorted to Hinundayan. Since then, this place was called Hinundayan.
The Church records as early as 1853 showed that the official name of the town was
HINUNDAYAN
THE CREATION OF THE TOWN
Before Hinunangan became a town, this and Hinundayan were part of the town of
Abuyog. But when it was created a town on the 18th century, Hinundayan was part of its
jurisdiction.
In 1752 and for two years thereafter, the town was continually raided and pillaged by Moro
pirates under the much – feared Moro Bandit, AGUD-UD. The Moros burn all the homes
and buildings including the Church, which was built by the Jesuit Missionaries. Because
the Moro pirates decided to stay within the place, the people moved their barangay to
another site, which was then called “YLIHAN”. Finally, the Moro left the place at their own

accord and the natives returned to their own pueblo, and began to rebuild what the pirates
had destroyed.
On March 21, 1876 the Governor of Leyte Jose Fernandez issued an Executive Order
proclaiming Hinundayan a separate town. In 1883, the pueblo was inaugurated as a
Municipality, the first “Kapitan Municipal” was Don Regino Reuterez. On May 9, 1885 the
new town was erected into a parish with Fr. Manuel Concuera as the first priest. But its
townhood lasted only until the Revolutionary Period. When the American came, it became
a barrio of Hinunangan again. The “Kapitan Municipal” at that time was Don Luis
Lagumbay.
The American forces arrived in 1901 and establish their headquarters at Hinunangan.
Peace and order had not been restored yet due to the active guerilla maneuvers of the
insurrections, so Hinundayan had to remain under the jurisdiction of Hinunangan.
Due to the petition of some concerned Hinundayanons, Executive Order No.59 was
issued on July 31, 1909 signed by Governor General W. CAMERON FORBES and Act
No.986 proclaiming Hinundayan a separate town from Hinunangan.
On January 01, 1910 Hinundayan was formally inaugurated as full – pledged municipality.
It was under Mayor INOCENTES VILLAFLOR that the town won its independence from
Hinunangan. It was under his leadership that the first intermediate school in the locality
was successfully opened. It was the only complete elementary course in the southern
part of the province at that time.
World War II broke out and years of occupation passed without any major change in the
municipality. However, a Japanese troop occupied the town one month after the
declaration of unconditional surrender by the Filipino troops to the Japanese Imperial
Forces. A puppet mayor was designated. The appointed mayor campaigned for the
return of the evacuees to their homes. When the Japanese moved out of the town upon
orders from the headquarters at Tacloban, the town enjoyed comparative peace for two
years but not for long, a guerilla band under the leadership of Anastacio Asodisen was
organized, with his three brothers as captains of the band. This aroused fear in the town
proper because of the existence of an organized guerilla movement. With aid of the
Japanese soldiers, who came upon hearing of the Asodisen guerillas, the puppet mayor
was reinstated.
On October 21, 1944 two American airplanes sunk a Japanese ship as it was about to
drop anchor at Hinundayan Gulf. Those who survived proceeded to Tacloban by land.
The Filipinos who decided to cast their fate with the Japanese accompanied them. On
the following day, October 22, Hinundayan was finally free from the clutches of Japanese
rule.
The people return to their homes and the Municipal Government again began to function
under peacetime conditions. Acting Mayor Teodoro Niog took the reign of the town
government until the inauguration of the Philippine Independence, LEONCIO P. OLARTE
was the first mayor under the new regime who succeeded him.

AWARDS AND RECOGNITION

The Local Government Unit of Hinundayan in its efforts to give quality service and clients
satisfaction had received numerous awards and recognition, such as the following:
CY 2023 - Excellence Award Small Scale Category,

Rice Competitiveness Enhancement Fund (RCEF)
CY 2022 - Outstanding Performance, Peace and Order Council

Outstanding Performance, Anti-Drug Abuse Council
- Top 1 in Region VIII COVID-19 Vaccination
- Fully Compliant Municipality 22nd Gawad KALASAG
CY 2021 - Seal of Child-Friendly Local Governance

- ADAC Awardee, ADAC Regional Audit and National Calibration
- 3rd Runner-up
Locally-funded Projects Implementation Assessment
- 2nd Runner-up
Road Clearing Program
- Awardee as LGU with Low Level of Stunting Prevalence
CY 2019 - DUGONG BIGAY, DUGTONG BUHAY AWARDEE

- CFLGA Passer, Child-Friendly Local Governance Audit (CFLGA)
- Provincial First Placer, ADM Projects Implementation
- Topnotcher Peace and Order Council Audit
CY 2018 - DUGONG BIGAY, DUGTONG BUHAY AWARDEE

- Seal of Child-Friendly Local Governance
- FLORENTINO PEÑARANDA AWARD
for Outstanding Blood Program Implementor (LGU Category)
CY 2017 - Seal of Child-Friendly Local Governance

- Regional Winner GAWAD SAKA Outstanding Municipality
- Best in Coastal & Fisheries Resources Management & Dev’t.

LGU Brief Profile
The Local Government Unit of Hinundayan is a fifth income class municipality. It has a total
land area of 6,108 hectares or 61.08 square kilometers, comprised of seventeen (17)
barangays as part of its jurisdiction. Among these barangays, 4 are classified as urban and
the remaining 13 are rural; 8 are coastal barangays while 9 are interior and/or upland.
Geographically, it is located in the Visayas Islands particularly in the southeastern tip of the
island of Leyte. It is one of the eighteen municipalities comprising the province of Southern
Leyte and among the six towns in the Pacific Area that composed the Third Integrated Area
Development (IAD).
The municipality is approximately located within the coordinates of 125 ̊ 48” longitude and
10 ̊ 21” North latitude, in the Southeastern Coast of the Province of Southern Leyte, Region
VIII. It faces directly to the Surigao Strait and the vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean. It is
bounded in the northwest by the municipality of Hinunangan, in the south by the municipality
of Anahawan and in the east by the Surigao Strait and in the west by the municipalities of
Hinunangan and Saint Bernard. The municipality is 135 kilometers away from Tacloban City,
143 kilometers from Maasin City, 52 kilometers from Liloan and 112 kilometers from
Hilongos. The different mode of transportation to access the municipality is by land thru bus
and van, by boat or ferry via Liloan (from Mindanao) and Hilongos (from Cebu) and by plane
via Tacloban airport.
Demographically, the municipality of Hinundayan posted a total population of 12,398 and

3,037 total number of households in 2020.
The municipality of Hinundayan is predominantly agricultural. It has a total agricultural land

area of 3,795.70 hectares or 62.14% of its total land area. With this agricultural area, 1,026
hectares are planted with rice and 2,359 hectares with coconuts which can be considered
as the major income producing crop of the municipality. Various crops like coffee, cacao and
fruit trees were planted under or within the vacant coconut areas intercropped with other
root crops and banana. Vegetables and other cash crops are also grown in the locality.

Hinundayan is also a coastal municipality with rich and diverse marine resources. Total area
of municipal waters is 23,907.89 hectares and a total coast line of 11.72 kilometers. The
fishing ground is 21,630.98 hectares which is allowable for fishing activities. Capture
methods of passive category include hook and line, fish pot, gill net and spear gun.
The municipality has three marine protected areas totaled to 76.5 hectares. These are the
32.5-hectare Ambao Fish Sanctuary, the 23-hectare Sabang Fish Sanctuary and the 21-
hectare Sagbok Fish Sanctuary. The municipal waters of Hinundayan are also dotted with
some corals of 208.48 hectares and mangrove forest of 16 hectares. The sea teems with
various marine organisms. There are 584 registered fisherfolks (OMAS, 2020) and all are
categorized to be of small-scale capacity. These registered fisherfolks are using motorized
boats and paddle propelled canoes. Housewives of these fisherfolks are also members of
organizations involved in food processing such as banana chips and other root crops - based
chips production, meat processing, dressmaking and coco coir production. Hinundayan’s
coastal resources has its own share of tourism destinations for snorkeling, diving, fish
feeding in fish sanctuaries and bathing in our sandy beaches.
The Municipality has a forest land of 1,336.08 hectares or 26.23% while A&D comprised of
4,771.95 or 73.77% of the total land area of 6,108 hectares. Most of the forestlands are
distributed in Barangays Cabulisan, Hubasan and Bugho. Most of the forestlands are under
the Community-Based Forest Management (CBFM) claimed by the BACUFA organization.
The BACUFA has the total area of 558.7 hectares. Currently, there are Three (3) barangays
covered in the CBFM program, namely Brgy. Bugho, Cabulisan and Hubasan. The other
part of the forestlands has a recent vegetative cover of mostly perennial crop, wooded
grassland and open forest.
Hinundayan’s economy is dominated by the primary sector: agriculture and fishery.

Nonetheless, secondary and tertiary sectors have also contributed to the economy through
provision of various services in the locality. Economic Activities that employed more
workers/laborers is wholesaling and retailing businesses, followed by services providers and

banking & finance institutions. Majority of the Business establishment in the municipality is
within the Commercial Business District (CBD) these are: groceries and general
merchandise, hardware, groceries and drug store, bakery, feeds dealer, banks and financial
institution, pawnshop, internet cafē, lodging houses, “carenderia” and others. The
abovementioned commercial establishment is occupying an estimated total area of 10.29
hectares.
On the other hand, the long sandy beaches of Hinundayan are potential tourism destinations
that cater both local and foreign tourists, which is also considered as economic driver. It has
crystal clear waters that are great attractions for snorkel enthusiasts and water sports
fanatics. The existing cottages and other facilities, however need upgrading from their
present state to compete with other resort facilities offering similar services. The road
condition going to the area must also be given priority, since convenience of tourists is a
must.
Data from the PSA survey in 2020 indicates that 32.9% of the total population in the
municipality were employed. There are more males ages 15 years old and above are
employed comprising 48.8% while only 16% of the female population of the same age are
employed. Development efforts of the municipality are aim to create job opportunities for the
unemployed as this will have impact on attaining objectives of food security.
PSA reported that poverty incidence in the municipality is 36.3 and 37.1 in 2012 and 2015
respectively, which ranked 13th and 14th in the province.
Based on the latest municipal data (CDRA 2020), 66.53% of the total household in the
municipality earned income below the poverty threshold, which can be attributed to the
recent crisis due to the pandemic and further aggravated due to the effects of typhoon
Odette in 2021. With the above situation, other family members need to look for other
alternative livelihood and assistance from government to cope the insufficiency of income to
sustain family needs.

Major source of income of the people in Hinundayan are through farming and fishing and of
the working age 42.96% are agricultural workers, 27.04% in wholesale and retailing, 15.58%
are in the teaching and other professional fields and 14.5% are in the personal services.
As a Local Government, Hinundayan is dependent on internal revenue allotment (IRA) now

NTA or National Tax Allotment, although it has local revenue sources such as income from
water system, real property and business taxes and other fees.
Hinundayan is noted for the type II climate in the previous years, however in the recently
conducted Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA), climate projections and
variables show that Hinundayan will be more humid in the months of June, July and August
due to 1.6% increase in temperature. And the predominance of a very pronounced maximum
rainfall is on November, December and January. With regards to tropical cyclones,
Hinundayan is mostly affected when the typhoon originates and passes through Surigao
area. Northeast monsoon (amihan) affects the municipality and is predominant in most time
of the year.
Like the rest of the component Municipalities of the Province of Southern Leyte, Hinundayan
had its share of experiencing disasters. For the past ten (10) years Hinundayan experienced
Flooding at Barangay District I, Lungsodaan and Baculod.
Though Hinundayan has no identified fault lines, it has felt various ground shaking and
quakes. On July 25, 2014 the municipality had experienced a 5.4 magnitude earthquake
affecting barangay Plaridel which resulted to damages of a few houses and school buildings.
Another calamity that was experienced by the municipality of Hinundayan was Typhoon
Odette (international name “Rai”) on December 16, 2021 which caused havoc and
widespread devastation to the people, houses, properties, infrastructures, lifeline and critical
facilities and severely damaged and disrupted the agriculture and the rest of the economic
sector. Storm surge hardly hit the coastal barangays in Hinundayan, that struck the coastal
communities which resulted to severe damages (washed-out) of houses and facilities along

the coast line. The devastation brought by Typhoon Odette affected the normal functioning
of the key sectors and has exhausted the meager resources of the local government unit of
Hinundayan.
Subsequently, the municipality is vulnerable and exposed to the risk of calamities and
disasters, hence, it is indispensable to mainstream and integrate Climate and Disaster Risk
Assessment into the different Local Development Plans.

General Location
The following figure illustrates the location of the Municipality of Hinundayan in the
country, in Region VIII as well as in the province of Southern Leyte.
It is geographically located in the Visayas Islands particularly in the southeastern tip of

the island of Leyte. It is one of the eighteen municipalities comprising the province of
Southern Leyte and among the six towns in the Pacific Area that composed the Third
Integrated Area Development (IAD).
The municipality as shown in the vicinity map is approximately located within the
coordinates of 125 ̊ 48” longitude and 10 ̊ 21” North latitude, in the Southeastern Coast of
the Province of Southern Leyte, Region VIII. It faces directly to the Surigao Strait and the
vast expanse of the Pacific Ocean. It is bounded in the northwest by the municipality of
Hinunangan, in the south by the municipality of Anahawan and in the east by the Surigao
Strait and in the west by the municipalities of Hinunangan and Saint Bernard.

Figure 1. Location Map of Hinundayan
SOUTHERN LEYTE
Region VIII
HINUNDAYAN
MUNICIPALITY OF HINUNDAYAN, SOUTHERN LEYTE 13

Figure 2. Base Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

Land Area and Political Subdivisions
The Municipal Planning and Development Office placed a total land area of 6,108
hectares of the municipality based on cadastral survey, 118 hectares of it is disputed area
between the municipality of Hinundayan and Hinunangan. However, the provincial
physical framework plan only noted a land area of 5,990 which corresponds to 3.52% of
the total land area of the province of Southern Leyte. This land area is divided into different
land uses such as follows: Built –up Area, Forest / Timberland, Agriculture, Open
Grassland and Road Network. Hinundayan is ranked number 10 in the province with
Maasin City as the biggest and Limasawa Island as the smallest in terms of land area.
The town is politically subdivided into seventeen (17) barangays, namely Amaga, Ambao,
An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III,
Hubasan, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Plaridel, Sabang, Sagbok.
Seven of these barangays are in the coastal area. These are Ambao, An-an, Cat-iwing,
District I, District II, Sabang and Sagbok. The remaining ten barangays are non-coastal
or land locked.
The table below shows the land area of the seventeen barangays comprising the
municipality of Hinundayan. The first four barangays comprised the urban area of the
municipality namely; District I, District II, District III and Lungsodaan which has a total land
area of 12.96 square kilometers. Barangay District I has the smallest land area of 0.87
square kilometers and Barangay District III which has a land area of 5.85 square
kilometers is the largest in terms of land area among the urban barangays.
The remaining thirteen barangays are the rural barangays of Hinundayan which has a
total land area of 48.12 square kilometers. The biggest rural barangay in terms of land
area is Bugho which has a land area of 7.49 square kilometers followed by barangays
An-an and Amaga which has land areas of 4.85 and 4.66 square kilometers, respectively.
Baculod is the smallest rural barangay based on land area which has only a total land
area of 2.06 square kilometers.

LAND AREA BY BARANGAY
BARANGAY AREA (ha.)

1. District I 24.76
2. District II 40.03
3. District III 52.51
4. Lungsodaan 100.89
5. Amaga 408.65
6. Ambao 215.01
7. An-an 649.10
8. Baculod 144.40
9. Biasong 396.46
10. Bugho 1,736.79
11. Cabulisan 706.30
12. Cat-iwing 231.44
13. Hubasan 416.71
14. Navalita 229.05
15. Plaridel 291.13
16. Sabang 190.42
17. Sagbok 274.36
TOTAL 6,108

Topography
Being a coastal town with a total land area of 6,108 hectares Hinundayan extends
from the shorelines towards the upper hinterlands.
The topography of the town is characterized by relatively wide flat lands along the
coastal areas and gradually sloping towards the interior mountainous areas.
Only few mountain ranges are found in Hinundayan. The highest elevation is 420
meter above sea level which is located in Barangay Cabulisan.
A generally descending pattern of elevation gradually drops towards the coastal area
with an average slope of 2%. A series of rivers and creeks drain surface run – off
water along the entire length of the municipality which make the area potentially
abundant in water resources for household and irrigation purposes.

Elevation Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

Slope
Land classified under 0-8% slopes with level to nearly level to gently sloping terrain is
approximately covering about 1,955 hectares equivalent to 32.01% total land area.
This type of slope is mostly planted with rice, coconut, bananas and fruit trees.
Barangays which are included in this land classification are lower portion of Cat-iwing,
Sagbok, Ambao, Biasong and Navalita; entire area of barangays District I, District II,
District III, Lungsodaan and Baculod; a portion of barangays Sabang, An-an and
Bugho.
Areas which slopes range from 8-18% categorized as gently undulating and gently
rolling and sloping in more than one direction comprised a total of 1,402 hectares
equivalent to 22.95% of the total land area. This category is the maximum for
economical land development and mechanization.
Land with 18-30% slope has an estimated area of 2,037 hectares or 33.35% of total.
This is the maximum slope for tree crop planting and classified as forest reserves. It
is also in these areas that watersheds are situated. This includes upper parts of
barangays Cat- iwing, Sagbok, Ambao, Biasong, Navalita and Bugho; interior
barangays such as Plaridel, Hubasan and Cabulisan. Most upper parts of Sabang and
An-an.
The remaining 714 hectares or 11.69% of the total land area of the municipality has
a slope of more than 30% which is not suited for any agricultural activities and should
be left to timber production.

Slope Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

Geology and Seismicity
There are two kinds of bedrock foundations that can be found in Hinundayan. These
are the marly limestone in the northern part and old sediments and pycroclastics
which are prevalent in the southern portion of the municipality.
The former covers 1/3 of the municipal area. It has mountainous proportion along the
coastline and poorly consolidated sediments are found along the banks of the
Camungaan River.
The municipality has no identified fault line however, earthquakes of minor intensity
occur sometimes in the area.
Based on the records of the Bureau of Soils and Water Management, the municipality
has nine types of soils. The most dominant is the Guimbalaon Clay Loam (GbMD2)
covering an area of 2,287.86 hectares or roughly 37.445% of the total municipal land
area.
The entire area of barangay An-an is covered by Faraon Clay (FaBE4) along the
northern coast of the municipality. Obando Fine Sand (ObXB) is found in the
Poblacion Area and barangay Sabang.
Barangays along the national highway to the north and part of Bugho and Cabulisan
has San Manuel Silt Loam (SmMAO1) type of soil. Taal Fine Sandy Loam (TaPB),
Louisiana Clay (LsBD2) and Guimbalaon Clay (GbBE3) are also abundant in the area
which is predominantly planted with coconut trees.
Hydrosol can be found in most parts of barangays Bugho and Cabulisan and in the
northern boundary to Hinunangan. San Manuel Fine Sandy Loam (SMPB) can be
found in barangays Lungsodaan and Baculod.
An undifferentiated mountainous soil can be found in the southeastern and northern
coasts of the municipality.

Soil Geologic Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

Water Resource
There are eight major rivers and a number of creeks which help drain excess water
from the land that flows towards the sea. These rivers are located in the different
barangays such as Cat-iwing, Sagbok, Ambao, District II, Lungsodaan and Bugho.
Some of these rivers had been used for irrigation like the ones in Sagbok, Lungsodaan
and Bugho.
Matunog Spring located in Barangay Cat-iwing and Hubasan Spring in Barangay

Hubasan are the sources of potable water in the municipality. These water sources
are the main component of the Hinundayan Potable Water System (HPWS). There is
also a waterfall in Barangay Cabulisan, locally known as “busay”.
With the presence of these water resources, the municipality has abundant water
supply potential for agricultural and irrigation purposes as well as for household use.

Water Resource Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

Climate
Based on the Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA) conducted in the
municipality, the following climate projections and variables were considered to affect
the locality for the ensuing years with the information about the pattern of change, as
well as the potential impacts and adaptation option.
Temperature
Referring to the climate projections, Hinundayan will be more humid in the months of
June, July and August due to 1.6% increase in temperature.
The following tables will show the climate projections, considering the increase in
precipitation and increase in temperature affecting the municipality.

CLIMATE PROJECTION FROM PAGASA (Increase in Temperature & Increase in Rainfall)

Projected Changes in Seasonal Rainfall in the Mid-21st Century (2036-2065) for Southern Leyte relative to 1971-2000
Projected Change
Projected
Seasonal Information about
Season Scenario Range* Rainfall Potential Impacts Adaptation Option
Percent Rainfall patterns of Change
amount Amount (mm)
(%)
(mm)
Highest possible future Forest Forest
December-January- rainfall during this
February (DJF) - Occurrence of rain- -Intensification of reforestation and tree
High season due to 13.3% induced flooding and growing activities
Emission Median 13.3 108.9 927.4 percent triggered by
landslides - Community-based forest protection
(RCP 8.5) Northeast Monsoon or
Observed baseline =
Amihan and Tail-end and - Deteriorating water - Construction of climate-resilient soil
818.6 mm quality protection structures
cold front
Reduced amount of rain - Soil erosion - Slope protection using geonets
March-April-May
(MAM) High may be observed - Endangered wildlife - Wildlife protection initiatives
Emission Median 2.9 10.5 372.8 resulting to minimal Agriculture - Intensify conservation awareness
Observed baseline = (RCP 8.5) hotter days for this - Flooding in low-lying and DRRM IEC
362.2 mm period production areas - Strengthen community based forest
June-July-August (JJA) High humidity is - Damage to irrigation and protection (Bantay Gubat)
High observed due to pre/post harvest facilities Agriculture
Emission Median -3.4 -17.4 493.4 Southwest monsoon, - Infestation of pests and - Rehabilitation of irrigation system
Observed baseline = (RCP 8.5) intermittent presence of diseases in crops, and line canals
rain
510.6 mm livestock and poultry - Establishment, rehabilitation of pre
September-October- - Damage to crops, and post harvest facilities
November (SON) livestock & poultry - Implementation of animal health
- Reduced productivity programs & initiatives
- Low quality of agri-

High products - Crop & livestock insurance

Emission Average Rainfall and - Continuing IEC to farmers
(RCP 8.5) Median -11.0 -76.5 619.4
Observed baseline = reduction of hot days
695.6 mm
- Conduct farmers’ field school
- Farm mechanization
- Subsidized farm inputs
- Planting flood-resistant variety of
agri crops

Urban Urban
- Flooding in floodprone - Installation/ establishment of early
urban areas warning system.
- Damage to properties - Conceptualizing of drainage &
- Disruption of economic sewerage master plan.
activities - Construction of climate-reslient river
- Loss of lives & flood control structure
- Loss of livelihood - Strict implementation of solid waste
management.
- Procurement of rubber boats and
other rescue equipments.
- Provision of “Go” bags, emergency
kits and other relief goods.
- Provision of alternative livelihood
and financial assistance
- Provision of insurance to buildings
and other government infrastructures
Coastal Coastal
- Increase
sedimentation/siltation -Reforestation / Intensify mangrove
due to flooding and beach trees planting
- Coral reef destruction - Strengthen community based
- Decrease of marine food coastal protection (Bantay Dagat /
supply Bantay Katunggan)
- Loss of livelihood - Construction of climate-resilient sea
wall/dike in coastal areas.
- Relocate vulnerable communities
- Conduct regular coastal cleanup

Projected Changes in Seasonal Temperature in the Mid-21st Century (2036-2065) for Southern Leyte relative to 1971-2000
Projected Change
Projected Information about
Season Scenario Range* Change Seasonal Mean Potential Impacts Adaptation Option
patterns of Change
in ℃ Temperature
(℃)
December- Forest
January-February Forest
Increase in temperature is - High incedence of forest fires.
(DJF) High Emission - Intensify conservation
Median 1.5 27.9 observed of 1.5% from - Degrade survival of trees and
Observed (RCP 8.5) awareness, training on forest fire
the baseline of 26.4 affect the biodiversity
baseline = 26.4 prevention, control and
- Water shortage
℃ management.
- Contribute to global warming
March-April-May - Implementation of national
(MAM) Slight increase in greening programs
High Emission
Median 1.6 29.3 temperature at 1.6% - Establishment of water
Observed (RCP 8.5)
result in hotter days impounding system and rain
baseline = 27.7℃ Agriculture
catchment facilities
- Decrease agricultural
June-July-August More humid days will be productivity located in upland
(JJA) observed due to 1.6% Agriculture
High Emission area - Establishment of water
Median 1.6 29.4 increase in temperature
Observed (RCP 8.5) - Pest and diseases infestation. impounding system and rain
from the observed
baseline = 27.8℃ baseline of 27.8⁰C - Heat stress on crops, livestock catchment facilities
and poultry - Vaccination of livestocks and
September- - Low productivity of crops and poultry.
October- livestock due to drought - Adjust housing facility of
November (SON) - Low quality of agricultural livestock and poultry to increase
products aeration.
- Food shortage and famine - Establishment of solar-
Minimal decrease in cold
High Emission - Malnutrition powered irrigation and deep
Median 1.5 29.0 season due to slight
(RCP 8.5)
increase in temperature well.
Observed Urban
baseline = 27.5℃
- Crop and livestock insurance
- Scarcity of water supply / Low
- Provision of alternative
water sources

- Airborne diseases livelihood.
- Deteriorating health conditions

of people Urban
- Heatstrokes - Maintaining urban forests in
- Urban heat islands parks and open spaces
- Planting trees along road
easements & buffers
- Construction of plant beds in
Coastal front of urban structures
- Deterioration of coral reef - Implementation of green
system engineering & green growth
- Infestation of crown of thorns policies.
- Reduced marine ecosystem
productivity Coastal
- Scarcity of food sources - Extraction of crown of thorns
- Loss of livelihood from marine-protected areas
- Decreased income - Increase coverage of beach
forests.
- Intensify NO Build Zone along
20m easement

Hazard and Vulnerability
Hinundayan is vulnerable to many hazards and prone to different calamities and

disasters. However, due to limitations and unavailability of some data, only four hazards
were considered in the Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment (CDRA) – flood,
landslide, liquefaction and storm surge. The Flood and Landslide hazard maps were
taken from the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB, http://www.mgb.gov.ph) while
the Storm surge hazard maps where from University of the Philippines Nationwide
Operational Assessment of Hazards (Project NOAH) and the Liquefaction maps were
taken from the results of READY Project.
The flood hazard map used is based on a “100 year-flood” or 1-percent annual
exceedence probability (AEP) flood as the basis and storm surge hazards were based
on storm surge alert level advisory 4 (SSA Level 4) considering 5meter storm surge
height. The landslide hazard maps were assessed based on landslide susceptibility
parameters such as slope gradient, weathering and soil characteristics, rock mass
strength, ground stability and human initiated effects. On the other hand, the
liquefaction hazard maps were based on the geology, presence of active faults,
historical accounts of liquefaction, geomorphology and hydrology of the area and
preliminary microtremor survey data utilized to validate type or underlying materials.
This assessment also considered only 5 systems of interest to be analyzed, namely -

population, critical facilities, lifeline utilities (roads), urban use and production areas.
Population as well as household data used in the exposure database were based on
the data collected during the household survey conducted per barangay by the
Municipal Planning and Development Office personnel and staff.
The barangays which are high risk to flooding are barangays Amaga, Ambao, An-an,
Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III,
Hubasan, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang and Sagbok.
Landslide prone barangays are Amaga, Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho,
Cabulisan, Cat-iwing, Hubasan, Navalita, Plaridel, Sabang and Sagbok.

Barangays that are high-risk to storm surge are Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong,
Bugho, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan, Sabang and Sagbok.
Likewise, Amaga, Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cat-iwing, District I,

District II, District III, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang and Sagbok are liquefaction prone
barangays.

Hazard Susceptibility and Inventory Matrix, Municipality of Hinundayan, Province of Southern Leyte.
Barangay Flood Landslide Storm Surge Liquefaction /
A B C D E
1.Amaga ✓ ✓ ✓
2. Ambao ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
3. An-An ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
4.Baculod ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
5. Biasong ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
6. Bugho ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
7. Cabulisan ✓ ✓
8. Cat-iwing ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
9. District I ✓ ✓ ✓
10.District II ✓ ✓ ✓
11.District III ✓ ✓ ✓
12. Hubasan ✓ ✓
13. Lungsodaan ✓ ✓ ✓
14. Navalita ✓ ✓ ✓
15. Plaridel ✓
16. Sabang ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
17. Sagbok ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Source: MDRRMO, 2019

Hazard Inventory Matrix, Municipality of Hinundayan, Province of Southern Leyte
Map Information Hazard Description
Susceptibility Magnitude Speed of Onset Frequency and/or Duration Areas Covered
*Speed of Onset (G),

Hazard *Susceptibility Is the hazard
*Magnitude (F), *Likelihood of Occurrence (H),
Format/date/Reference (E), What is the slow/creeping (i.e.
What is the What is the estimated likelihood
Source Scale likelihood to be
system estimated Sea Level Rise-SLR, or the average recurrence What areas/barangays within the
influenced/harm Drought) or
strength of the interval (expressed in years) that municipality/city are likely to be
ed by the rapid/fast a hazard event may happen?
hazard that will inundated or affected by a
hazard? (high, How long will the hazard occur
impact an area? (flashfloods,earthqu particular hazard?
medium, low) (expressed in seconds, minutes,
akes, landslides)? days, weeks etc.)?
SLOW/CREEPING or
LOW, MED, HIGH LOW, MED, HIGH
FAST/RAPID
A B C D E F G H I
Rivers and creeks were

Hazard Map,
flowing downstream higher District 3, District 2, District 1,
DENR,
Flood 1:10,00 than normal during heavy Biasong, Baculod, Lungsodaan,
Mines and 2018 Very High High Fast/Rapid Sagbok, Hubasan, Bugho, Sabang,
Susceptibility 0 rainfall and esp. in the
Geosciences Amaga, Ambao, An-an
occurrence of tropical
Bureau
cyclone (typhoon)
(MGB-2013)
Bugho, Sagbok, Amaga,

Lungsodaan, Navalita, District 1,
Hubasan, Sabang, Plaridel,
High Cabulisan, Biasong, Baculod,
Ambao, An-an, District 3, District 2,
Cat-iwing
Bugho, Lungsodaan, Navalita,

District 1, Hubasan, Sagbok,
Moderate Amaga, Plaridel, An-an, Biasong,
Ambao, District 2, Baculod,
Cat-iwing
Bugho, District 2, District 1, Cat-

iwing, District 3, Amaga, Navalita,
Low Sagbok, Biasong, Baculod, Ambao,
An-an

A B C D E F G H I
Hazard Map,
DENR, Mines Seldomly occurred
and during heavy rainfall Cabulisan, Biasong, Plaridel, Hubasan,
Landslide 1:10,000 2018 Very High Moderate Fast/Rapid
Geosciences during tropical Bugho
Bureau cyclone
(MGB 2013)
Bugho, Cabulisan, Hubasan, Biasong, Cat-
High iwing, An-an, Sagbok, Plaridel, Amaga
Bugho, Cabulisan, Cat-iwing, Biasong, An-

Moderate an, Ambao, Sabang, Sagbok, Plaridel,
Navalita, Hubasan, Amaga
Cat-iwing, Baculod, Biasong, An-an, Sagbok,
Low Plaridel, Navalita, Hubasan, Amaga,
Sagbok, Bugho
Storm openly comes during

Surge DOST- PAG- 2012 Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho,
tropical cyclone
Storm ASA 1:10,000 http://noah.up. High Moderate Fast/Rapid Cat-iwing, District 1, District 2, District 3,
(typhoon signal #3
Surge Project NOAH edu.ph Lungsodaan, Sabang, Sagbok
upward)
Advisory #4
(SSA4)
Ambao, Baculod, Biasong, District 3,

Moderate
Lungsodaan, Navalita
Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho,

Low Cat-iwing, District 1, District 2, District 3,
Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang, Sagbok

A B C D E F G H I
Hazard Map,
DENR, Mines Based on geology,
and historical account Amaga, Ambao, An-an, Baculod,
Geosciences of liquefaction, Biasong, Bugho, District 1, District
Liquefaction 1:10,000 2007 High moderate Fast/Rapid
Bureau (MGB- geomorphology 2, District 3, Lungsodaan, Navalita,
JICA) 2007 and hydrology of Sabang, Sagbok
READY the area
PROJECT
Low Sagbok, Cat-iwing

Flood and Landslide Hazard Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

Storm Surge Hazard Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

Liquefaction Hazard Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

POPULATION AND DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Total Population 12,398 (PSA, 2020)

13,547 (CDRA, 2020)
Total Households 3,415 (PSA, 2020)

3,488 (CDRA, 2020)
Average Household Size 4.00
Total No. of Barangays 17
Total Land Area 6,108 has
No. of Coastal Barangays 7

Total Population in Coastal 5,832
Barangays
Total Households in Coastal 1,691
Barangays
No. of Upland Barangays 10

Total Population in Upland 6,566
Barangays
Total Households in Coastal 1,724
Barangays
(source: PSA Census of Population 2020 and CDRA 2020)
No. of Registered Voters 9,549

Registered Male Voters 4,764
Registered Female Voters 4,785
(as of October 18, 2021, Source: COMELEC Hinundayan)
No. of PWDs 426 (CDRA, 2020)
No. of old dependents 1,339 (CDRA, 2020)

No. of young dependents 3,323 (CDRA, 2020)
No. of malnourished children 91 (CDRA, 2020)
No. of Senior Citizens 1,800

No. of Single Parents 150
(source: CDRA / MSWDO, 2020)

Hinundayan has a total population of 12,398 and 3,415 total number of households based
on the 2020 PSA Census of Population. On the other hand, the Climate and Disaster Risk
Assessment (CDRA) counted 13,547 total population and 3,488 total number of
households. The difference can be attributed to the different time reference of the survey.
Likewise, the series of community lockdowns which stuck some of the Hinundayanons in
other places as well as the “balik – probinsiya” that caused the influx of people counted
during the conduct of CDRA.
Population Composition
The table below shows the population composition of the municipality according to age
group. It indicates that 6,866 or 59.14 percent of the total population belongs to the
working age group, of which 52.11 percent are male and 47.89 percent are female. On
the other hand, the dependency ratio of the municipality is 68.36 percent which denotes
that for every 100 individuals 68 persons are dependent for their survival and existence;
55 of them are children with ages 0 – 14 years old and 13 of them are old ones with ages
65 years and above.
The table also exhibits that 35.58 percent of the school going population are in elementary
level with ages 7 to 12 years old, 23.60 percent are in secondary level with ages 13-16
years old; 21.22 percent are pre – schoolers with ages 3-6 years old and 19.61 percent
are studying in college.
Furthermore, it is being observed that on the different age group of the school going
population, it is consistent that the percentage of males is higher than the females. In 65
years old and above it is observed that there are more females compared to males.

Table 1. POPULATION COMPOSITION BY SCHOOL AND WORKING AGE AND

DEPENDENT - AGE GROUP AND SEX
Municipality of Hinundayan
Year 2015

Urban and Rural Population
In census year 2015, the municipality has a total population of 11, 610 and 2,747 total
number of households with an average of 4 members in each household. Almost thirty –
four percent (34%) of the total population is living in the urban barangays. Among the
rural barangays three has the largest population namely; Baculod with 995, Sagbok with
903 and Ambao with 883 total population.

Table 2. HOUSEHOLD POPULATION BY URBAN AND RURAL BARANGAY,

AVERAGE HOUSEHOLD SIZE AND NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLD AT RISK
2015
Barangay Population Number of Average Household
Household Size
Urban
District I 680 169 4.02
District II 943 208 4.53
District III 1,069 230 4.65
Lungsodaan 1,296 345 3.76
Sub-Total 3,988 952 4.19
Rural
Amaga 299 69 4.33
Ambao 892 231 3.86
An-an 562 146 3.85
Baculod 1,007 235 4.29
Biasong 742 198 3.75
Bugho 893 203 4.40
Cabulisan 283 71 3.99
Cat-iwing 440 112 3.93
Hubasan 577 150 3.85
Navalita 675 182 3.71
Plaridel 345 82 4.21
Sabang 617 169 3.65
Sagbok 959 237 4.05
Sub-Total 8,291 2,085 3.98
TOTAL 12,279 3,037 4.04
Source: PSA 2015

Population Density, Gross Density and Built Up Density
The population density of a certain place determines the number of people living in that
particular area. Given the total land area of the municipality which is 6,108 hectares or
61.08 square kilometers and based on the population count of 2015, Hinundayan has a
population density of 201 persons per square kilometer. The urban barangays had a
population density of 307 persons per square kilometer while the rural barangays had a
population density of 172 persons per square kilometer.
It can be observed in the following table that there are rural barangays such as Ambao,
Baculod, Sabang and Sagbok which have higher population density compared to some
urban barangays classified. This is so, because of the differences of the barangays in
terms of land area. Among the urban barangays, District I is densely populated with 782
persons per square kilometer, shortly followed by barangay Lungsodaan with 781
persons per square kilometer.
Of the thirteen rural barangays, Baculod is the most populated with 489 persons per
square kilometer, followed by Ambao, Sagbok and Sabang with 322; 294 and 245
persons per square kilometer, respectively.
Barangay District II has the highest built-up density of 89,000 followed by District I with
22,167. It can be attributed that these barangays are located in the poblacion area or
town center where most of the people want to live due to availability of facilities and
services. These barangays were followed by barangay District III with 9,075 and Sagbok
with built-up density of 9,030. The remaining barangays has a built-up density of less than
6,500 and barangay Amaga has the least built – up density of 335. It can be observed
that upper or highland barangays has less population and built-up density and more
people settle in places where accessibility to their respective sources of income, facilities,
services and utilities are present.

TABLE 3. POPULATION DENSITY, GROSS DENSITY AND BUILT – UP DENSITY

2015
POPULATION BUILT-UP
BARANGAY POPULATION AREA (ha) DENSITY DENSITY
Urban 3,988 1,296 307 9,556
1.District I 680 87 782 22,167
2.District II 943 458 206 89,000
3.District III 1,069 585 183 9,075
4. Lungsodaan 1,296 166 781 5,096
Rural 8,291 4,812 172 2,662
1.Amaga 299 466 64 335
2.Ambao 892 277 322 5,194
3.An-an 562 485 115 3,333
4.Baculod 1,007 206 489 4,975
5.Biasong 742 452 164 1,744
6.Bugho 893 749 119 6,485
7.Cabulisan 283 425 67 1,125
8.Cat-iwing 440 281 157 3,550
9.Hubasan 577 297 194 3,950
10.Navalita 675 291 232 1,618
11.Plaridel 345 305 113 4,914
12.Sabang 617 252 245 4,692
13.Sagbok 959 326 294 9,030
TOTAL 12,279 6,108 201 3,518
As computed based on PSA Census of Population, 2015

Other Population Characteristics
Literacy Rate
The following table illustrates the literacy rate of population 5 years and above. It shows
that of the 10,436 or 90 percent of the total population in Hinundayan who were 5 years
and above; 9,354 or 90 percent are literates and 1,082 or 10 percent are illiterates.
It is observed further, that there are more females who are literate than males. The higher
literacy rate can be attributed to the availability of learning facilities in almost all the
barangays in the municipality. All seventeen barangays have day care centers and out
of the seventeen barangays only three do not have elementary or multi-grade elementary
schools. Among these are Districts I and II which share the central school located in
District III and barangay Sabang which populace go to Lungsodaan elementary school.
TABLE 4. LITERACY RATE OF POPULATION 5 YEARS OLD AND OVER, YEAR

Municipality of Hinundayan 2015

Labor Force
The table below demonstrates that 32.9 percent of the total population in the municipality
of Hinundayan are employed, higher compared to the provincial percentage which is 24.2
percent. It is also illustrated that there are more males than females in Hinundayan who
are employed, this is so, because females are oftentimes the ones who are at home doing
housekeeping and attending the children’s needs.

TABLE 6. POPULATION 15 YEARS OLD AND OVER BY SEX,

EMPLOYMENT STATUS
Municipality of Hinundayan 2015
Source: PSA data, 2015
Religion
Most Hinundayanon’s are Christians. A large number of them are Roman Catholic.
Among the total population of 12,279 in 2015, the Roman Catholics dominate with 97.73%
or 12,025 of the entire populace. The remaining 2.27% comprise other religious affiliation
such as Adventists, Aglipay, Pentecost, Dating Daan, Jehovah’s Witnesses, Iglesia ni
Cristo and Assembly of God.
Dialect
Visayan is the lingua franca of most Hinundayanons with obvious bol-anon accent which
comprise 99.04% of the total population. Others can also communicate well in other
language such as English and Tagalog as well as Waray-waray dialect.
Ethnicity

The Hinundayanons are primarily descendants of the Bol-anons or the people from Bohol
who first migrated to this place during the early centuries. Currently, the people who live
in Hinundayan is a mixture of Cebuano, Waray and even Tagalog. There is no identified
indigenous people (IP) in the municipality.
Poverty Incidence
PSA reported that poverty incidence in the municipality is 36.3 and 37.1 in 2012 and 2015
respectively, which ranked 13th and 14th in the province.
Based on the latest municipal data (CDRA 2020), 66.53% of the total household in the
municipality earned income below the poverty threshold, which can be attributed to the
recent crisis due to the pandemic and further aggravated due to the effects of typhoon
Odette in 2021. With the above situation, other family members need to look for other
alternative livelihood and assistance from government to cope the insufficiency of income
to sustain family needs.

SOCIAL SERVICES
The Social Services catered by the municipality to its constituents includes basic health
and education services which are delivered in the number of schools and day car centers,
hospitals and health centers.
• Number of Schools
The educational system in Hinundayan is primarily administered by the Department of

Education (DepEd). Educational institutions are managed by both public or government
sector and private sector. The public schools both elementary and secondary comprised
the Hinundayan District governed by the District Supervisor.
There are fourteen (14) public elementary schools in the municipality located in the
fourteen different barangays and one (1) public secondary school located in Barangay
Lungsodaan. There are three (3) barangays that do not have elementary schools namely
District I and District II which shared the education facilities of Hinundayan Central School
located in District III; and barangay Sabang which students go to Lungsodaan Elementary
School.
All of these schools have good comfort rooms; 6 schools have good playground facility
the rest have poor or no playground at all; 5 schools have their good clinic facilities the
remaining 10 schools do not have a clinic; 5 schools have good library, 3 have poor library
and the remaining 7 schools do not have a library at all; 4 schools have good laboratory
while the rest do not have a laboratory at all; and all the schools do not have a shop.
Thus, it is imperative that all schools in all level in the municipality must improve and/or
enhance its different existing facilities and establish those lacking ones.
Moreover, there are schools such as the Cat-iwing multi-grade elementary school which
made use of the makeshift building for its classrooms intended for pre-elementary, hence
there is a need to construct better and concrete classrooms.
On the other hand, the Plaridel multi-grade elementary school needs for immediate repair
especially for its Marcos type building that was constructed way back in the year 1960s.
In the Secondary level, the number of teachers suffice to meet the standard required of
one teacher per forty pupils but on student-ratio of forty students in a classroom it merely
shows that there is a need to construct more classrooms especially for the senior high
school.

• Hospitals
The municipality of Hinundayan extends its medical and health programs and services to
the people through the Rural Health Unit and Barangay Health Centers. There is also a
privately owned hospital, the Saint Vincent Medical Clinic which services are limited and
caters only to minor illnesses and cannot perform major operation. A private medical clinic
and a private dental clinic is also present in the locality to accommodate consultations of
minor illnesses.
The RHU have complete medical staff and personnel that meets the DOH standard ratio
of 1doctor: 20,000population; 1nurse: 15,000population, 1midwife:5,000population.
However, there is still no dentist employed in the municipal health center.
The RHU building is strategically located within the town proper of Hinundayan. The area
on the different rooms, like laboratory room, delivery room, consultation room, dental
room and others though conforms DOH minimum standards, lacks medical equipment to
respond to major emergency cases and operations. Thus, complicated medical cases
were referred to Anahawan District Hospital in the neighboring town and further
transferred to Sogod, Maasin and Tacloban City.
With the foregoing circumstance, there is a need to establish a Super Rural Health Unit
in the municipality with complete facilities and equip with medical apparatus to cater the
medical and emergency needs of the constituents.
• Day Care Centers
Presently, there are seventeen (17) Day Care Centers in the municipality located in the
17 barangays under its jurisdiction. Most of the day care centers need repair and
rehabilitation to enhance its facilities.

ECONOMY
• Major Economic Activities
Major source of income of the people in Hinundayan are through farming and fishing and
of the working age 42.96% are agricultural workers, 27.04% in wholesale and retailing,
15.58% are in the teaching and other professional fields and 14.5% are in the personal
services.
Hinundayan’s economy is dominated by the primary sector: agriculture and fishery.
Nonetheless, secondary and tertiary sectors have also contributed to the economy
through provision of various services in the locality. Economic Activities that employed
more workers/laborers is wholesaling and retailing businesses, followed by service
providers and banking & finance institutions. Majority of the Business establishment in
the municipality is within the Commercial Business District (CBD) these are: general
merchandise, hardware, groceries and drug store, bakery, feeds dealer, banks and
financial institution, pawnshop, internet cafē, lodging houses, “carenderia” and others.
The abovementioned commercial establishment is occupying an estimated total area of
10.29 hectares.
• Number of Business Establishments by Industry sectors

INFRASTRUCTURE
• Transportation and Utilities
Transportation is an essential key element in the development of any municipality. It

provides the means for people, goods and information to circulate within thus,
revitalizing the economy and socio-cultural life in the area. Efficient internal and
external linkages within the municipality should be taken into considerations to
determine its capacity to support the existing and future needs.
Road Network
The road network is categorized into four (4) sub-groups: national, provincial,
municipal and barangay roads. As of 2015, the municipality has registered a total
road length of 74.078 kilometers. The national and provincial roads found in the
municipality that function as major arterial roads has a total length of 11.7 kilometers
and 24.4 kilometers, respectively. The municipal roads which usually function as
secondary roads have combined length of 4.770 kilometers. For the barangay roads,
which provides the access to the different parts of the municipality by serving as feeder
and service roads, has a total length of 33.208 kilometers.
Almost the entire national and municipal road length is concrete but rehabilitation of
some portions of municipal streets in the poblacion area is still needed. However, a
significant stretch of the provincial and barangay roads are still unpaved, where only
73% of the total provincial road length is concrete.
The major transportation system in the municipality is mostly by land. These include the
various types of publicly designed or public utility vehicles like cars, buses, jeepneys, and
the privately owned tricycles and motorcycles. This transportation system in the
municipality covers various routes serving not only the residents of the municipality but
also of the neighboring municipalities. Tricycles also serve as the means of transportation
from the Poblacion to the barangays. The known ″habal-habal″ or single motorcycles are
popular means of transport in the far-flung barangays which can carry up to six (6)
passengers.

Source of Power Supply

The Southern Leyte Electric Cooperative, Inc. (SOLECO) is generating power supply in
the municipality 24 hours a day. SOLECO the only power facility operates in the
municipality, a franchise holder from NAPOCOR which is located in Tongonan and has a
sub-station in Himay-angan. Records shows that 40.84% of households are being
served in the Rural Areas and 29.38% in the Urban Areas and or there is only 25.63%
and 4.15% are unserved in the Rural and Urban Barangays respectively.
As to the type of electrical/power connection, domestic has the highest number which is
1,919 followed by Commercial establishment which has 132 and Institutional has 61 with
an average consumption per month of 55, 57 kwh and 150 kwh.
Presently, there are 818 households that need to be served by electricity. It is projected
in 2025 that the number of households will increase to 3,294. There is an additional
requirement for household connections of 988 to be served by electricity in the next ten
years. The total number of households that demand for electricity is 1,806.
Source of Water Supply

The Municipality of Hinundayan has abundant supply of water which the Hinundayanons
considered as a great blessing being endowed with such abundance in nature. Almost
all barangays are supplied by Level III water system, except in Barangay An-an which
has a low pressure to no water at all because of its elevation.
The MATUNOG Spring which is the ultimate source of water in the municipality is located
in Barangay Cat-iwing. Constituents of this barangay and the neighboring barangays
within the watershed support and protect this valuable water source by planting more
trees within the vicinity and implement the 3-kilometer radius protected zone. Residential
is not allowed within this area.
Another water source is the HUBASAN SPRING in Barangay Hubasan which

supplements the supply of water in other parts of the municipality.

However, there are still untoward activities present, like illegal cutting of trees for
household consumption which posed infallible destruction to the water source. Aside from
these manmade threats, this area is also exposed to hazards: tropical cyclone,
earthquake, rain induced landslides, based on the assessment of Mines and
Geosciences Bureau, Department of Environment and Natural Resources.
Although the municipality has already enjoyed the convenience of efficient water supply
system, level 1 facilities are still maintained to serve as back up source of supply ready
in times of calamity and disaster because the existing spring water sources are vulnerable
to damage caused by the aforementioned hazards.
Communication
The Philippine Postal Corporation, a government owned and controlled corporation is the
market leader in the postal services in the past years for the prompt delivery of letters,
pouches, packages and boxes of their clients. There is an existing Post Office in the
municipality located within the old municipal premises. It is manned with a Post Master
and One (1) Postal Clerk/Mail Carrier serving the total population of 12,279 in 2015
(based on PSA data).
Nowadays, with the advent of modern technology other means and mode of
communication is being used. Other private enterprises like LBC and other forwarders
shared the market of postal servicing extended by the Philippine Postal Corporation.
Cellular phones are often use for text and call messaging which made telegrams and
telegraphs become obsolete and unpopular.
In Hinundayan there is no landline connection available in the area. However, two (2)
cell sites were installed in the municipality; Globe tower that provides network services to
Globe and TM subscribers and Smart tower which caters Smart, Talk n Text and Sun
users.
On the other hand, internet services is another form of communications which made
communication through letters turn outdated especially with its clock-time interactive
voice, audio and messaging capability which offered cheap and available round the clock
at the comfort of your homes.

There are four (4) digital cable service providers that give the clear signal of television
the Fiesta cable which is a wired digital cable provider while Dream TV, Cignal and G-
Sat are digital satellite cable providers. Fiesta Cable covered only the poblacion
barangays namely District I, District II, District III and Lungsodaan while the rest of the
areas in Hinundayan subscribed Dream, Cignal and G-Sat TV. However, there are still
households in the remote areas that use the traditional TV antennae.
• Administrative Infrastructures
There are satellite national government offices stationed in the municipality and provide
link to the local government namely:
a. Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR)
b. Commission on Elections (COMELEC)
c. Department of Agrarian Reform (DAR)
d. Department of the Interior and Local Government (DILG)
Thru: Municipal Local Government Operations Officer (MLGOO)
e. Philippine Coconut Authority (PCA)
f. Philippine National Police (PNP)
g. Bureau of Fire Protection (BFP)
h. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI)
Thru: Negosyo Center
i. Philippine Postal Corporation (PHILPOST)
j. Department of Education (DepEd)

ENVIRONMENT
• Solid Waste Management
The municipality in its quest for proper solid waste management and in compliance with
RA 9003 has closed its open dump site and established the Municipal Recovery Facility
(MRF) and Residual Containment Area (RCA). Households are encouraged to practice
proper segregation at source, where the biodegradable are retained in the household for
composting while the non-biodegradable are collected by the solid waste managers and
the residual garbage were deposited in the RCA.
The LGU is planning to procure high thermal decomposition system machine (incinerator)
to address the prevailing and environmental degradation issue on plastic and other
synthetic materials.
Meanwhile, an efficient garbage collection and disposal system as well as a massive
campaign to educate the people in the barangays on proper solid waste management
shall be given priority by the LGU.
On the other hand, solid waste management entails manpower and resources which
mainly depends on the LGU’s limited resources, thus initiatives on waste segregation,
reuse, reduce and recycle at source are greatly encouraged.
• General Air Quality

Generally, the air quality circulating in the municipality that most Hinundayanons enjoyed
is fresh and clean. This can be attributed to the abundant vegetation and trees growing
in the area in addition to the fresh sea breeze.
• General Water Quality
The quality of water that the constituents consume is uncontaminated, cool and refreshing
given the fact that it came from a natural spring, the Matunog and Hubasan spring.

INSTITUTIONAL MACHINERY
• Political Subdivisions
The municipality of Hinundayan is administratively divided into seventeen (17) barangays

namely wherein four (4) barangays are classified as urban and thirteen (13) barangays
are classified as rural. Seven (7) of these barangays are in the coastal area. These are
Ambao, An-an, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, Sabang and Sagbok. The remaining ten
(10) barangays are non-coastal or land locked.
The following are the names of the 17 barangays in alphabetical order:
1. Amaga 10. District II

2. Ambao 11. District III
3. An-an 12. Hubasan
4. Baculod 13. Lungsodaan
5. Biasong 14. Navalita
6. Bugho 15. Plaridel
7. Cat-iwing 16. Sabang
8. Cabulisan 17. Sagbok
9. District I

• Organizational Structure
Municipal Mayor OFFICE OF THE VICE-MAYOR

----------------
EVELYN T. LEE, CPA EDNA ADANZA RESMA
SANGUNIANG BAYAN
MPDO
MEMBERS
MA. BELLA GILBUENA
MBO
FLORABELLE B. VILLAMOR SB SECRETARY
JUNAFE J. ACEJO
MACCO
ARTHUR RYAN A. OYONG
SANGUNIANG BAYAN
HRMO SECRETARIAT OFFICE
CRISPINA C. ADOLFO
SECRETARIAT
MDRRMO
KATHLEEN PONCE COCHARO
MTO MCR
BENILDA ABAD VICTORIA B. CALVAR
MASSO OMAS
LUCIANA C. CALVAR CRISTANO R. BUAL
MSWDO MEO
WELMA E. CINCO GERMENIANO A. NEJUDNE
MHO MENRO
BJORN BOYD D. MONFORTE, ROCEL B. CELESTE

MD, MPH 17 BARANGAYS

Integrated Development Planning Process
Based on Republic Act 7160, the planning function of the LGU is lodged in the Local
Development Council. Thus, the Municipal Development Council (MDC) was
constituted/organized by the Mayor through an Executive Order. The composition of the
MDC as specified in Sec. 107 of RA 7160 was strictly complied with, including the
representation of NGO/POs. Among the MDC members are 2 women’s organizations,
an indication that women are given opportunities to take part in the planning process. The
MDC is able to carry out all its functions as mandated in Sec. 109 of RA 7160.
The Executive Committee was also organized to represent the MDC and act in its behalf
when not in session. Sectoral or functional committees were organized as well to assist
the MDC in the performance of their functions. The sectoral and functional committees,
which serves as ad hoc or standing committees are currently assisting the MDC in the
updating of the Comprehensive Development Plan and the Comprehensive Land Use
Plan (CLUP).
As to the database to support planning, available data of the Municipal Planning and
Development Office are from the community Based Monitoring System (CBMS) and the
Local Data contributed by various local government offices.
Development Legislation Generally, the Sangguniang Bayan is development oriented as
evidenced by the number of legislative measures enacted/passed. With the end in mind
of setting policies and legislations that ensures high quality service delivery, the
Sangguniang Bayan of Hinundayan had enacted 71 ordinances (including Codes) in
2017-2022 and 986 resolutions in 2019-2022.
All revenue-raising measures of the Sangguniang Bayan are products of consultation.
Consultation was employed by the SB prior to legislation, in the form of public hearings.
The Sangguniang Bayan’s consultation with the planning body usually pertains to the
CLUP containing zoning regulations and on planning matters with CDP as the reference.
SB members also get inputs for legislations from their participation in sectoral committee
meetings and from barangay activities such as sessions & assemblies.

Existing legislative tracking system is computer aided and is capable of generating

information of existing local rules and regulations complementing national laws, status of
draft ordinance in the legislative process and existing local rules thereby avoiding
duplication. However, said system is not capable of generating information on local rules
and regulations which are being enforced or not. Said legislative tracking system must be
computer-based.
For enhanced performance and for development, the SB may consider the following:
• Update codes (Revenue & General Ordinances)
• Codify health ordinances
• Establish legislative tracking system
• Formulate GAD Code and Updates Code for Children
Not all the legislative measures enacted by the Sangguniang Bayan are implemented or
fully implemented for the reason that the Local Chief Executive is attending to many
functions and has no staff to focus solely on this matter. Structural mechanisms may be
employed by the Mayor for the effective enforcement of ordinances, with the group
formulating administrative provisions or drafting Executive Order providing for rules and
regulations/guidelines in the implementation of ordinances.
CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION IN LOCAL GOVERNANCE

With a governance philosophy of “expanding governance base through broadening
participation of the civil society”, the incumbent Local Chief Executive has made possible
the active participation of the civil society in governance through their participation in the
Local Special Bodies (LSB) which are Municipal Peace and Order Council (MPOC), Local
Health Board (Local Health Board), Local School Board (LSB), and the Municipal
Development Council (MDC). Participation of the different sectors in governance
including the marginalized sector was fostered by the present administration.
In its efforts for participatory governance, organizations which are represented in other
committees/councils are not only limited to those accredited by the Sangguniang Bayan.
Other sectors which are empowered though not able to get an SB accreditation are the
youth, agricultural sector, differently-abled (PWD) and senior citizens.

The municipality must be guided with the following provisions of the IRR of RA 7160:
1) In the case of Local Health Board, the organization is involved in health services;
2) In the case of Local School Board, representative organizations shall be limited to
parents-teachers association, teacher’s organization and organization of non-academic
personnel of public schools;
3) In the case of the Local Peace and Order Council, organizations shall come from the
academe, civic, religious, youth, labor, legal, profession, business and media
organizations,
4) No organization or representative shall be a member of more than one local special
body within the municipality;
5) Designated representatives of selected organizations which are members of the Local
Special Bodies shall designate their principal and alternate representatives.
Consistent with the policies and principles of decentralization provided in the Local
Government Code of 1991, all national agencies with project implementation functions
operating locally must coordinate with the Mayor and the Sanggunian in the
implementation of their programs and projects. Consultations are also conducted prior to
project and program implementation.
Also anchored on the principle of decentralization, the Municipal Mayor is empowered by
RA 7160 to exercise general supervision over component barangays to ensure that said
barangays act within the scope of their prescribed powers and functions. On the said
legislation, Mayors are also entrusted the function of reviewing executive orders
promulgated by Punong Barangays within his jurisdiction. Ordinances enacted by the
Sangguniang Barangays also go through review of the Sangguniang Bayan to see to it
that the barangays are legislating within their prescribed powers and functions.
Considering that the barangay exercises executive, legislative and judicial powers and
functions as provided in RA 7160, the barangays are in a strategic position to perform the
critical role in policy-making, planning and delivery of basic services and facilities,
administering barangay justice system and building partnerships with the various
stakeholders working within the locality. With these critical and wide-ranging roles in

governance, the barangay officials need the guidance of higher local government units
such as the municipality.
In Hinundayan, Punong Barangays seldom issue Executive Order (EO) and if there is,
such EO is seldom passed to the Local Chief Executive for review. On the other hand,
barangays are already practicing the submission of their barangay ordinance to the
Sangguniang Bayan for review.
FISCAL MANAGEMENT
Fiscal management involves the management of financial affairs, transactions and
operations of the local government unit. This is governed by fundamental principles set
forth by the Local Government Code of 1991 or RA 7160 and other pertinent laws. The
challenge for LGUs in fiscal management, especially those belonging to the lower class
is to fully exercise its power of taxation to maximize collection of locally generated
revenues.
Revenues of the municipality of Hinundayan derived from local sources are classified into
local taxes and operating and miscellaneous revenues. Local taxes consist of the
amusement tax, business tax, community tax, franchise tax, real property tax and fees on
weights and measures. While operating and miscellaneous revenues is composed of
permit fees, registration fees, clearance and certification fees, garbage fees, inspection
fees, medical and laboratory fees, income from economic enterprises, and parking fees,
rentals and interest income. Among the local taxes, the top three (3) sources in the proper
order are business tax, real property tax and community tax. With regards to operating
and miscellaneous revenues the top three sources are the income from the market,
waterworks system and permit fees, respectively.
The LGU has not yet fully implemented the computerized billing system and electronic
business permit and licensing system (e-BPLS) making transactions slower, thus it is
recommended that the LGU should invest in the computerization of its business permit
and billing system. More so, an information technology expert should also be hired to take
charge on this program implementation.

LGU BUDGET
Revenues derived from local sources cannot substantially and sustainably finance all
budgetary requirements of the municipality, thus the LGU relied on the Internal Revenue
Allotment (IRA), now National Tax Allocation (NTA). Nevertheless, maximizing local
revenues is targeted to lessen NTA dependency considering that said allotment fluctuates
due to the economic crisis brought by the COVID-19 pandemic as well as to fully exercise
the LGU’s revenue-raising powers.
On the other hand, a vital part in administering financial affairs is the effective allocation
of resources through the budget. The budget reflects the Projections of Income and
Expenditures so with the LGU established priorities. The budget is a vital link for the
planned programs and projects’ implementation. All contractual obligations and other
budgetary requirements which include 55% Personal Services, 20% Development Fund,
5% Calamity Fund, and 2% Discretionary fund (RPT) are set aside, prior to the
appropriation for maintenance and other operating expenditures, 5% of the total
appropriation is also allocated for GAD related programs, projects and activities (PPAs.).

II. MATRIX OF LOCAL DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS

SMALLER
SPATIAL UNITS
SECTOR / INDICATOR OF LARGER
CORE PLANNING OF PLANNING
SUB- DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL
CONCERNS AREA AREA
SECTOR UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT
1 2 3 ...
n
1. SOCIAL
Demography Population Size • Population size (all 2015-
census years 12,285
available including 2020-
latest) 13,547
Population • Growth rate, urban 2020-0.19
Growth Rate and rural, short-term
medium term, long
term (formula used)
Population • Gross population 2015-
Distribution density, 2 reference 296/sqkm
years
• Net population
density, 2 reference
years
• Percent of urban
population, 2
reference years
• Urban population
density, 2 reference
years
Level of Access to • Proportion of 6-12
Well-Being education year old children who
are not in elementary
school, by sex, latest
• Proportion of 13-16
year olds who are not
in secondary school,
by sex, latest
Access to health • Percent of 1%
services households without
sanitary toilets, latest
• Proportion of children 3.16%
0-5 years old who are
below normal weight
for their age
• Proportion of children 0
under 5 years old who
died of illness, 2
reference years
• Proportion of women 0
who died due to
pregnancy, 2
reference years
• Proportion of 2 births 0
attended by skilled

health personnel to
total deliveries, latest
• Prevalence rates of
HIV/AIDS, malaria, 1,479
tuberculosis, and cases
other diseases, latest 1.11%
• Death rates of
HIV/AIDS, malaria,
tuberculosis and 103 deaths
other diseases latest 0.778%
Social Poverty • Proportion of 1,158
Justice households whose
members eat less
than 3 full meals a
day, 2 reference
years
• Proportion of
population with
incomes below
poverty line (consult
data for region)
Security • Proportion of
households who are
informal settlers, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
households with
dwelling structures
unable to protect
them from the
elements, 2 reference
years (focus on
roofing and outer
walls)
• Proportion of 5 rape
households with cases
members victimized
by crime to total
households, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
households without
access to level II and
level III water supply
system, 2 reference
years
Gender Equality • Ratio of girls to boys
in elementary,
secondary and
tertiary school, latest
• Share of women in
non-agricultural wage
employment
2. ECONOMIC

General Labor and • Percent labor force

employment employed by sex, 2
reference years
• Dependency ratio, 2
reference years
(youth and old age)
• Percent of workers in
non-agricultural
occupation, 2
reference years
• Proportion of persons
15 years old and
above who are not
working but actively
seeking work
• Proportion of children
below 15 years old
who are employed to
the total number of
employed persons
Agriculture Agricultural • Volume/value of
Production agricultural crop
production by major
crop, 2 reference
years
• Volume/value of fish
production inland &
marine, 2 reference
years
• Fishing HH/Total HH
Food self- • Food self-sufficiency
sufficiency index by food groups,
latest
Forestry • Per capita value of
production
• Employment
contribution of
forestry in percent of
total employment
Fishery • Per capita fish
consumption
(m.t./year)
• Ratio of commercial
fishing production
versus municipal
fishing production
Industry • Ratio of electrical
energy consumption
in industry &
commerce to total
consumption
• Volume/value or
mining/quarrying

production, 2
reference years
Industry and Household • Percentage of
Services Income households with
secondary/ tertiary
source of income
• Percentage of
households engaged
in main source of
income only to total
number of
households
Services • Total number of
commercial
establishments, in
EEU, 2 reference
years
• Tourism receipts per
year
3. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Forest Resource Base • Change in stock of
Ecosystem and Land Use forestry resources:
dipterocarp, tree
plantation,
mangroves, pine,
rattan (ha/year)
• Soil erosion in upland
areas (mm/year)
• Forest land
classification ratios (in
%)
• Ratio of population to
certified A&D areas
(in percent)
• Percentage of
timberland
proclaimed as forest
reserve
Tenure • Area covered by
Arrangement leases and permits
per lessee/permittee
Tenure • Area covered by
Arrangement CBFMA as percent of
total forest area
• Number of families
benefitting from
community-based
projects as percent of
total number of
families
• Growth rate of upland
population (per
annum)

Lowland/ Land Use and • Extent of area

Agricultural Land devoted to agriculture
Ecosystem Productivity in percent of A&D
• Land Use changes
(ha/year)
• Land productivity
(m.t./ha)
• Ratio of upland
devoted to agriculture
over total upland area
(in percent)
• Areas under IPM
relative to total
cropland (in percent)
Other • Cropland per
Agricultural agricultural worker
Areas (ha)
• Extent of agricultural
area under
mechanized
cultivation (in %)
• Ratio of agricultural
workers to the
number of
harvesters/threshers
servicing the area
• Extent of irrigable,
irrigated, rainfed, non-
irrigated and prime
lands converted to
non-agricultural uses
(ha/year)
Soil degradation • Extent of problem
soils (hectarage) as
percent of total land
area
• Erosion rates by land
use (mm/year)
• Area distribution of
erosion/degradation
classes as percent of
total land area
• Extent of soil
conservation (area
coverage) as percent
of eroded/degraded
soils
Fertilizer and • Nitrogen use per unit
Pesticides Use of agricultural output
(kg/m.t.)
• Pesticide use per unit
of agricultural output
(kg/m.t.)

• Inorganic fertilizer
used per unit area
(kg/ha)
Fertilizer and • Organic fertilizer used
Pesticides Use per unit area (kg/ha)
• Ratio of organic to
inorganic fertilizer
used
Tenure • Area by tenure of farm
per household, 2
reference years
Urban Air Quality • Concentration of air No data
Ecosystem pollutants at selected
sites: number of
violations of
standards in a year
per site
• Incidence in a year
per site per 1000
inhabitants
• Emission levels of
different pollutants
per source
Solid Waste • Solid waste per capita 1.065.59
Management in m.t. or cu.m.
• Non-biodegradable
waste per capita (m.t.
or cu,m.)
Water Quality • Waste generated per
capita per year (in m.t.
or cu.m.)
• Effluents by source
(various units)
• Concentration of
water pollutants in
selected water bodies
(various units)
Land Use • Informal settler
density (informal
settlers/total
population)
• % of total land area
occupied by squatters
• Rate of change in
industrial land use
(ha/year)
Coastal Resource Base • Mangrove area:
Marine annual rate of
Ecosystem depletion (ha/year)
• Seagrass beds:
number of species, 2
reference year

• Seagrass beds:
status or condition, 2
reference year
• Coral reef and coral
cover: status or
condition, 2 reference
years
• Area of fishing ground
relative to fishing
population (ha/1,000
population)
Resource Base • Marine protected
areas as percent of
total area of municipal
waters
• Presence of indicator
fish species, 2
reference years
Threats • Concentration of key
pollutants in selected
sites, 2 reference
years
• Concentration of
coliform in selected
beaches (in ppm)
• Oil spills: number and
magnitude
• Rate of sedimentation
on selected bays
(mm/year)
Freshwater Surface and • Physical quality
Ecosystem Ground Water indicators, 2
Quality reference years
• Chemical quality
indicators, 2
reference years
• Biological quality
indicators, 2
reference years
• Nitrate content of
selected rivers, 2
reference years
Quality of Major • Rating of the general
Freshwater condition of
Bodies freshwater body,
latest
• Number of licensed
abstractors and
volume of abstraction
in mcm per annum
• Area of fishpens as
percent of area of
freshwater bodies

Critical
resources
Minerals and • Ratio of mining
Mines incidents and
accidents to total no.
of mining industry
workers
• Incidence of illness
due to mining
operations per year
• Hectarage disturbed
by mining as percent
of total mineralized
areas
• Estimates of mineral
deposits, by type of
minerals in metric
tons
Biodiversity Ecosystem • Proportion of
Diversity ecosystem area
highly threatened
species over total
number of known
species
Ecosystem • Number of sites
Diversity identified for
migratory birds per
100 hectares
• Number of exotic
species introduced
over total number of
species
• Species diversity
index
Conservation • Proportion of
Efforts protected areas with
illegal settlements to
total protected areas
• Level of ex situ
conservation in
percent
• Critical habitat/areas
restored in ha/year
• Number of
conservation
programs
implemented per five
years
• Habitat size
restored/rehabilitated
per year
• Number of visitors in
protected areas per
year

• Percent of protected
areas converted to
other uses
• Number of
households per
square km. of
protected area
4. INFRASTRUCTURE
Social Utilities • Percent of HH served
Support by electric power
• Ratio of HH served by
piped water supply to
total urban HH
Health • No. of hospital beds
per 1000 population
Education • Classroom-to-pupil
ratio in elementary
schools; in secondary
schools
Telecommunicat • No. of
ions telephones/1000
urban HH
• Ratio of postal
employees to total HH
population
Economic Public Roads • Road density (area
Support covered by roads to
total land area)
Public Roads • Total length of roads
in km/total land area
of A&D land
• Kilometer of road per
100 population
• Density of farm to
market roads (km/100
ha of farmland)
• Percent of permanent
bridges
Administrativ Office Space • Total office floor
e Support space per municipal
employee (in sq. m)
Public Safety • No. of fire trucks per

capita
• No. of police
outposts/1000
households
• No. of
prisoners/detention
cell
Municipal • Percent occupancy of

Cemetery municipal cemetery

Open Space • Total area of public

open space per 1000
inhabitants
• Total number of
covered
courts/number of
barangays
5. INSTITUTIONAL
Local Fiscal Revenue • Total revenue per
Management Performance capita, 2 reference
yrs
• Self-reliance index, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
delinquencies to total
RPT collected, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
delinquent RPT
payers to total listed
taxpayers
• Ratio of proceeds
from special levies to
total revenues, 2
reference years in
previous and present
administrations
• Ratio of financial
grants or donations to
total LGU income, 2
reference years in
administrations
Expenditure • Total public
expenditure on capital
outlay per capita, 2
reference years
• Ratio of municipal
government
employees to total no.
of local taxpayers
RPT • No. of big taxpayers
who account for 80%
of tax revenues
• Total revenue
collected as percent
of annual collection
target, 2 reference
years
• Percent RPT
collected to total
potentially collectible

• Amount of tax arrears

recovered over total
tax arrears at the
beginning of budget
year
Municipal • Proportion of receipts
Enterprises from municipal
enterprises to total
local revenues
Organization • Proportion of
and vacancies to total
Management plantilla positions,
administrations
• Ratio of casual
employees, previous
and present
administrations
• Ratio of employees to
total no. of personnel
by type, 2 reference
years
• Managerial
• Technical
• Administrative
• Ratio of confidential
positions to total
plantilla positions,
administrations
Public • Ratio of LDC member
Participation NGOs and POs per
capita, previous and
present
administrations
Development Legislative • Proportion of
Administratio Output “development”
n legislation to total
sanggunian output,
last and current
administrations
Credit Financing • Total public debt
incurred by the LGU
per capita, past and
present
administrations

CHAPTER III
THE LGU VISION
“A progressive agricultural municipality and eco-tourism

destination in Southern Leyte with God- loving, healthy,
empowered, gender-sensitive & disaster- prepared citizenry
living in a safe, well-conserved & climate change resilient
environment under proactive civil servants”
HINUNDAYAN’S VISION ELEMENTS AND DESCRIPTORS
I. Descriptors Success Indicators
Sectoral Elements:
Social Sector – God-loving, healthy, empowered
Economic Sector – progressive
Environment Sector – well-conserved, climate change resilient
Institutional Sector – empowered, God-loving, gender-sensitive, proactive
Infrastructure Sector – gender-sensitive, disaster prepared, climate change resilient

THE LGU MISSION

We, the development – oriented leaders anchored by the principle of transparency,
commit to:
• Deliver effective and efficient basic services to the constituents;
• Provide applicable technologies on Agriculture and Fisheries;
• Develop and maintain infrastructure projects;
• Enact and implement ordinances beneficial to the general welfare;
• Sustain peace and order and public safety of the community;
• Preserve and enhance natural resources;
• Promote self – reliance among constituents;
• Strengthen LGU – NGO/PO/PS linkage;
• Institutionalize capability – building program;
• Integrate and enhance moral recovery program.

II. Vision – Reality Gap Analysis

CURRENT VISION OBSERVED
DESCRIPTOR SUCCESS INDICATOR REALITY REALITY CONDITION
GAP
SECTOR: SOCIAL
Safe to live and do 84.61% 15.38% Presence of
Safe business in index crime
committed
Prevent crimes and 84.61% 15.38% Security is
solutions provided shared
responsibility
Strong Triumvirate 50% 50% Lack of linkages
Cooperation to to different multi-
Different Stakeholders sectoral
organization
Zero Crime Rate 15.38% 84.61% Commission of
NIC
Empowered Children 3 to 4 years 232 ECCD 23% Parents lack of
old accessing ECCD enrollees awareness
Reduction of Child Poverty
labor cases incidence
SECTOR: ECONOMIC
conventional
Progressive farming system
Agricultural adopted by
municipality Increased food variety farmers
60% 40%
production by 100% Presence of
prime
agricultural land
conversion
dilapidated and
damage
irrigation dams
and canal linings
Irrigated 100% of
70% 30% during Typhoon
irrigable lands
Odette;
illegal
construction of
infrasrtucture

along the
irrigation canals
and diversion of
water from
irrigation canals
unproductive
Utilized 100% of vacant
agricultural land
& idle lands for 5 5
(coconut area
agriculture
and iddle land)
lack of
credentials
100% of livestock
5 5 required in
insured
livestock
insurance
100% Increased
decline hog
livestock and poultry 5 5
industry
production
less insurance in
100% of crops insured 7 3
high value crops
Established marketing
system & secured at farmers
least 4 suppliers readiness for
5 5
contract with competitive
supermarkets within marketing
the region
Establishment of
Marine Watch No Marine
0 10
tower/MPA Guard Watch Tower
House at Brgy. Sabang
100% of the fisherfolks not all fisherfolks
able to follow the have permits in
required permits in the 4 6 utilization of
utilization of Municipal Municipal
Waters Waters
Construction of new
Unconstructed
modernized slaughter 5 5
slaughterhouse
house in Brgy. Biasong
Establishment of value
lack of extension
adding of agricultural 2 8
support provided
products
after the training
slow progress of
Establishment of
2 8 planned
Municipal Nursery
activities
delayed
completion of
the project;
Rehabilitated FMRs 5 5
roads
excavation
caused traffic
poor conditions
Constructed FMRs 6 4
of most FMRs
Construction of limited office
Municipal Agriculture 9 1 space to cater
Building the FITS Center

lacking facilities
and equipment
in FITS Center;
inadequate
extension
worker to cater
all commodities
and delivery of
basic
agricultural
service; no
promotion of
existing AEWs
to higher salary
grade
100 % of the populace
altered
have other sources of
livelihood
income aside from its
opportunities
main 2 8
Encouraged the Youth
(OSY) to engage in
3 7 Aging farmers
farming and to be an
Agriprenuers
No life insurance
Give life insurance to to qualified
qualified farmers 0 10 farmers
-Not
Eco-tourism Developed tourism 10% 90% institutionalized
destination attraction and facilities tourism office
-limited tourism
investors
-lack tourism
infrastructure
facilities
-lack manpower
-limited funds
SECTOR: ENVIRONMENT
well- 100% Potable water 100% 0% Stringent
conserved quality enforcement of
environment Clean Water Act
and other
related laws
25 % increase of 7% 18% There is 7%
Forest cover in forest cover in
production forest production forest
due to
collaboration of
the DENR and
other
stakeholders

75% decrease of illegal 25% 50% There is 25%

logging incidence of
illegal logging
activities
Reduced to 80% 20% 60% There is 20%
incidence of illegal incidence of
cutting activities illegal cutting
activities done
by apprehended
violators
0% of mining activities 0% 0% No Mining
activities
operation
25% increase of 7% 18% There is
mangroves cover approximately
7% mangrove
cover due to the
implementation
of greenbelt
program
100% Implementation 50% 50% There is
of RA 9003 approximately
50% of
implementation
of RA 9003
(Ecological Solid
waste
management
program)
50% increase of tree 20% 30% There is
cover as natural approximately
barriers in coastal 20% tree cover
areas in coastal areas
due to the
environmental
protection
programs such
as tree planting
95% Protected 85% 10% There is
watershed area approximately
85% of
protected
watershed area
due to
collaborative
efforts of
different
agencies and
stakeholders
Zero incidence of 0 0 There are zero
Grass/Forest Fire incidence of
grass/forest fire
One (1) person per
Disaster household trained for 100% Budgetary
0%
Prepared first aid and basic life Gap Constraints
Citizenry support

One (1) person per

household participated
in community disaster
simulation drills such 100% Information
0%
as: a. earthquake drill Gap constraints
b. Fire Drill c.
Evacuation drill d.
tsunami drill
Constructed additional
Budgetary
standard municipal
Constraints
evacuation centers
SECTOR: INSTITUTIONAL
Empowered Public hearing 80% 20% Obsolete

Policies/Ordinance ordinances
Resolutions resolutions
God-loving Implementable by all 80% 20% Presence of
community different sector
in the
community
Gender- Reorganize LGBTQ Lack of IEC
Sensitive Participate in 75% 25% No Orientation
Government
Pro-active Capacitated/Competent Lacks of
local Legislators sufficient
training on local
legislation
SECTOR: INFRASTRUCTURE
Gender- All facilities are gender- Some of the -existing

sensitive sensitive compliant facilities are facilities are
not gender- constructed prior
sensitive to gender
sensitivity
Increase concreted 65.77% of 34.23%
road networks road network unpaved
concreted
Disaster Compliant with the 60% of 40% -No strict
prepared Building Code and buildings are implementation
other regulations not compliant of Building Code
-Lack personnel
to monitor
-indifference of
barangay
officials
Climate Standard infrastructure Most of the -most of the
change facilities infrastructure infrastructures
resilient facilities are were
not climate constructed
change before CCA law
adaptive/
resilient

Strong structural Most -most structures

capacity of infrastructures were built
infrastructures do not without securing
conform with building permits
structural
standards
III. Climate and Disaster Risks Assessment (CDRA) Analysis
Due to limitations and unavailability of some data, only four (4) hazards were considered
in this assessment – flood, landslide, liquefaction and storm surge. The Flood and
Landslide hazard maps were taken from the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB,
http://www.mgb.gov.ph) while the Storm surge hazard maps where from University of the
Philippines Nationwide Operational Assessment of Hazards (Project NOAH) and the
Liquefaction maps were taken from the results of READY Project.
The flood hazard map used is based on a “100 year-flood” or 1-percent annual
exceedance probability (AEP) flood as the basis and storm surge hazards were based on
storm surge alert level advisory 4 (SSA Level 4) considering 5meter storm surge height.
The landslide hazard maps were assessed based on landslide susceptibility parameters
such as slope gradient, weathering and soil characteristics, rock mass strength, ground
stability and human initiated effects. On the other hand, the liquefaction hazard maps
were based on the geology, presence of active faults, historical accounts of liquefaction,
geomorphology and hydrology of the area and preliminary microtremor survey data
utilized to validate type or underlying materials.
This assessment also considered only 5 systems of interest to be analyzed, namely -

population, critical facilities, lifeline utilities (roads), urban use and production
areas.
POPULATION EXPOSED TO FLOOD

Hazard
Based on the hazard maps from the Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB), 88% of the
barangays in the municipality or a total of 15 barangays are flood prone. These barangays
are Amaga, Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cat-iwing, District I, District II,
District III, Hubasan, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang and Sagbok. Among these
barangays, only Barangay Amaga has low flooding susceptibility, while the rest have high
and very high susceptibility. And based on anecdotal accounts and interviews, it was in
barangay Baculod, Lungsodaan, Sabang, District I, District III and part of Navalita where
flooding mostly occurred because of the Camungaan River. On the other hand, Barangay

Cat-iwing’s flooding is caused by the existing waters coming from Cat-iwing River.
Likewise, areas in Barangay Ambao and District II are flooded due to the waters from
Lagiwliw River.
Exposure
Based on the results of the recently conducted household assessment in the barangays,
the total number of household count in the municipality is 3,488 and 2,042 households or
58.54% are exposed to flood. Among these, 959 households or 27.49% has LOW flood
susceptibility, 672 households or 19.27% with MODERATE flood susceptibility, 258
households or 7.39% has HIGH flood susceptibility and 153 households or 4.39% with
VERY HIGH flood susceptibility.
Barangay Sabang has the highest percentage of exposed household with 128 or 3.67%
of the total household with VERY HIGH flood susceptibility, this is because it is located
along the banks of Camungaan and Bito rivers and at the same time it is located along
the coast. On the other hand, Barangay Amaga has the least percentage of exposed
household of 15 or 0.43% of the total household with LOW flood susceptibility.
Sensitivity
Assessing the sensitivity of the exposed household and population in flood prone areas,
it was found out that there are no household who are considered as informal settlers,
1,237 households are living in houses made of light materials, 2,206 of the exposed
population are young and 977 are old dependents, 313 are persons with disabilities
(PWDs), 1,563 households are living below the poverty threshold and 44 are
malnourished individuals.
There are 1,237 exposed households to flooding who are living in dwelling units made of
light materials, 183 of these are in Barangay Lungsodaan which comprises 14.8% of the
affected households, followed by Barangay Ambao which has 163 households or 13.2%
of the affected household and Barangay Baculod which has 138 households or 11.2% of
the affected households. The sensitivity score of households exposed to flooding who are
living in dwelling units made from light materials has an average of 3.8 out of 4.
The total exposed population to flooding accounted to 9,453 or 69.8% of the total
population; 2,206 or 23.3% of the exposed population are young dependents while 977
or 10.3% of the exposed population are old dependents. The highest number of exposed
young and old dependents are recorded in Barangay Lungsodaan with 297 young
dependents and 169 old dependents, respectively. The sensitivity score of exposed
households to flooding with young and old dependents has an average of 3.9 out of 4.
The municipality has a total of 333 Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) who are exposed to
flooding. Barangay Lungsodaan has the highest number of 79 PWDs or 23.7% of the total
exposed persons with disabilities. It was followed by Barangay Ambao with 37 PWDs or

11% of the total exposed PWDs and Barangay Baculod with 30 PWDs or 9% of the total
exposed persons with disabilities. It is also noted that in Barangay Hubasan there is no
PWD who is exposed or affected to flooding. The average sensitivity score is quite low at
1.3 out of 4.
Of the exposed households in flood susceptible areas, 1,560 households declared that
they are living below the poverty threshold. All affected barangays have exposed
households living below the poverty threshold with Barangay Lungsodaan as the highest
of 271 households or 17.4% of the total exposed household to flooding living below the
poverty threshold, followed by Barangay Baculod with 228 households or 14.6% of the
total exposed household to flooding living below the poverty threshold and Barangay
Ambao with 181 households or 11.6% of the total exposed household to flooding living
below the poverty threshold. The sensitivity score is quite high at 3.9 out of 4.
Among the households exposed to flooding, there are forty-four (44) household members
(5 years old and below) who are malnourished individuals found in nine out of the fifteen
affected barangays. Barangay Baculod has the highest number of 9 or 20% of the total
malnourished individuals, it is followed by Barangay Biasong and Barangay Ambao with
8 or 18% and 7 or 16% of the total malnourished individuals, respectively. Considering all
the affected barangays, the sensitivity score of exposed households to flooding with
malnourished individuals is manageable at 1.02 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
Looking into the adaptive capacity of households exposed to flooding, which includes
areas in access to infrastructure – related mitigation measures; access to financial
assistance; capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate; access to information and
government investments.
All households exposed to flooding answered that they have access to infrastructure –
related mitigation measures. This manifests that they have been benefited with the
infrastructure projects initiated by the government to mitigate the adverse effects of
flooding which include river flood control projects, construction of drainage canal and
other related infrastructures.The corresponding adaptive capacity score on this area is 4.
Similarly, all households affirmed that they have access to financial assistance, though in
limited scale, but the local government see to it that assistance in whatever form, financial
or in kind is readily available and accessible by the affected households. This area had
an adaptive capacity score of 4.
On the other hand, the capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate of the affected
households is at 34% and has a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 3.3 out of 4.
The strong mindset of property ownership or landholdings which is common among
households exposed to flooding is a hindering factor in implementing relocation

measures. Though, these households cannot easily be relocated, but they are more
willing to retrofit their dwelling or housing units.
In access to information, 99.3% of households exposed to flooding claimed that they have
access to information with a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 4 out of 4. With the
advent of new technology, social media and interconnectivity, it is much easier to be
notified on warnings and information of upcoming hazards. Likewise, the local
government thru the MDRRM office conducts information drive and education campaigns
to increase awareness among household members which subsequently increases their
adaptive capacity.
Government investment is moderate with an adaptive capacity score of 2. With the LGU’s
dependency to IRA, it can only invest a reasonable amount in CCA – DRR because there
are also other sectors and priorities to be addressed. As such, only minimal funds
invested in adaptive capacity measures.
Vulnerability Score
Considering the exposure data in high flooding, Barangay Sabang is the most exposed
with 5.4 exposure score and vulnerability score of 0.50 while the least exposed and
vulnerable is Barangay Navalita with 1.0 exposure score and 0.50 vulnerability score. On
the other hand, the exposed to low flooding areas, the vulnerable barangays are Ambao,
Baculod, Bugho, District I, District II and Sagbok with 1.32 exposure score and 0.50
vulnerability score. The overall exposure score is 1.90 and vulnerability score of 0.50.
Severity of Consequence
Taken into consideration the population exposed in high flooding susceptible areas,
Barangay Sabang has the highest Severity of Consequence score with 3.0, while the
rest of the barangays have a severity score of 1.0. Overall, the severity of
consequences score of population exposed to flooding is 1.36.
Risk Score
The population exposed to high flooding, all barangays has a Risk Score of 10.0 or lower
and has Risk Category of “low” and “moderate” except for Barangay Sabang which has
a Risk Score of 18.00 and “high” Risk Category. The average Risk Score is 6.18
interpreted as “moderate”. This indicates that the population exposed to flooding are
moderately at risk to the potential negative consequences of flooding events.

POPULATION AT RISK TO FLOODING
DECISION TECHNICAL IMPLICATIONS POLICY

AREA/S FINDINGS INTERVENTIONS
- Vulnerable to -Implementation of flood
Barangay Sabang 1 barangay is highly at adverse effects of control projects and
risk to flooding flooding; loss of related infrastructures
lives, damage to (dikes, river bank
properties, loss of protection);
livelihood -Institutionalization of
evacuation procedures,
DRRM policies and
protocols including
provision of evacuation
kits;
-Installation of early
warning signages; -Strict
implementation of policies
related to construction of
dwelling units in highly at-
risk areas;
- Allocation of funds for
financial assistance to
indigent families;
- Construction of more
standard evacuation
centers to ensure
adequate facilities to cater
the needs of the people
during calamities;
-Improve and strengthen
Early Waring System and
Devices;
- Implementing green
engineering in
infrastructure projects and
retrofit existing structures
to ensure resiliency;
- Relocation of highly at-
risk communities;
-Enforcement of existing
zoning regulations and
promote intensive IECs on
these policies

POPULATION EXPOSED TO LANDSLIDE

Hazard
The Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) map indicateds that there are thirteen (13)
barangays or 76% of barangays in the municipality which are susceptible to landslide.
These barangays are Amaga, Ambao, An-an Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan, Cat-
iwing, Hubasan, Navalita, Plaridel, Sabang and Sagbok. Among these barangays,
Cabulisan, Hubasan and Sagbok have high landslide susceptibility while the rest have
low and moderate landslide susceptibility. Based from anecdotal accounts and interviews,
landslide events occasionally occur in the municipality.
Exposure
the total number of household count in the municipality is 3,488 and 1,032 households or
29.59% are exposed to landslide. Among these, 384 households or 37.2% has LOW
landslide susceptibility, 571 households or 55.3% with MODERATE landslide
susceptibility, and 68 households or 6.6% has HIGH landslide susceptibility.
Barangay Hubasan has the highest percentage of exposed household with 168 or 16.3%
of the total affected household because it is located on a rolling to moderately steep
category. It is followed by Barangay An-an with 138 or 13.4% exposed households and
Barangay Sagbok with 123 or 11.9% of exposed households.
Sensitivity
Assessing the sensitivity of the exposed household and population in landslide prone
areas, it was found out that there are no household who are considered as informal
settlers, 623 households are living in houses made of light materials, 4,136 total exposed
population to landslide, of which 1,132 are young and 361 are old dependents, 117 are
persons with disabilities (PWDs), 799 households are living below the poverty threshold
and 50 are malnourished individuals.
There are 623 exposed households to landslide who are living in dwelling units made of
light materials, 119 of these are in Barangay Hubasan which comprises 19.1% of the
affected households, followed by Barangay Navalita which has 73 households or 11.7%
of the affected household and Barangays Amaga & Bugho which have 71 households or
11.4% of the affected households. The sensitivity score of households exposed to
landslide who are living in dwelling units made from light materials has an average of 4
out of 4.

The total exposed population to landslide accounted to 4,136 or 30.5% of the total
young and old dependents are recorded in Barangay Hubasan with 196 young
households to flooding with young and old dependents has an average of 3.95 out of 4.
The municipality has a total of 117 Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) who are exposed to
landslide. Barangay An-an and Navalita has the highest number of 17 PWDs or 14.5% of
the total exposed persons with disabilities. It was followed by Barangay Hubasan with 16
PWDs or 13.7% of the total exposed PWDs and Barangay Plaridel with 13 PWDs or 11%
of the total exposed persons with disabilities. It is also noted that there is no PWD who is
exposed or affected to landslide in Barangay Baculod and Sabang. The average
sensitivity score is quite low at 1.05 out of 4.
Of the exposed households in landslide susceptible areas, 799 households declared that
they are living below the poverty threshold. All affected barangays have exposed
households living below the poverty threshold with Barangay An-an as the highest of 100
households or 12.5% of the total exposed household to landslide living below the poverty
threshold, followed by Barangay Amaga with 91 households or 14.4% of the total exposed
household to landslide living below the poverty threshold and Barangay Bugho with 79
households or 9.9% of the total exposed household to landslide living below the poverty
threshold. The sensitivity score is quite high at 4 out of 4.
Among the households exposed to landslide, there are fifty (50) household members (5
years old and below) who are malnourished individuals found in ten out of the thirteen
affected barangays. Barangay Sagbok has the highest number of 11 or 22% of the total
malnourished individuals, it is followed by Barangay Bugho and Barangay Cabulisan with
7 or 14% of the total malnourished individuals, lastly Barangay Hubasan with 6 or 12% of
the total malnourished individuals. Considering all the affected barangays, the sensitivity
score of exposed households to landslide with malnourished individuals is manageable
at 1.1 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
Looking into the adaptive capacity of households exposed to landslide, which includes
All households exposed to landslide answered that they have access to infrastructure –
landslide. The corresponding adaptive capacity score on this area is 4.

or in kind is readily available and accessible by the affected households. This area had
households is at 21.8% and has a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 3.1 out of 4.
The strong mindset and attachment to property ownership or landholdings which is
common among households exposed to landslide is a hindering factor in implementing
relocation measures. Though, these households cannot easily be relocated, but they are
more willing to retrofit their dwelling or housing units.
In access to information, 99.4% of households exposed to landslide claimed that they
have access to information with a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 4 out of 4.
With the advent of new technology, social media and interconnectivity, it is much easier
to be notified on warnings and information of upcoming hazards. Likewise, the local
adaptive capacity. However, there are a few households who do not own modern gadgets
and there are also some who lived in far-flung areas which cannot be easily reached with
the public information system.
Government investment is moderate with an adaptive capacity score of 2. With the LGU’s
dependency to IRA, it can only invest a reasonable amount in CCA – DRR because there
are also other sectors and priorities to be addressed. As such, only minimal funds
Vulnerability Score
Considering the exposure data in high landslide, Barangay Hubasan is the most exposed
with 4 exposure score and vulnerability score of 0.50 while Barangay Cabulisan and
Sagbok are less exposed with 1.0 exposure score and 0.50 vulnerability score. On the
other hand, areas with low exposure to landslide, the vulnerable barangays are Biasong,
Bugho and Sagbok with 1.32 exposure score and 0.50 vulnerability score. The overall
exposure score is 1.6 and vulnerability score of 0.50.
Taken into consideration the population with high exposure to landslide in susceptible
areas, Barangays Amaga, An-an, Cabulisan, Hubasan, Navalita, Plaridel and Sagbok
have the highest Severity of Consequence score of 2.0, while the rest of the barangays
have a severity score of 1.0. Overall, the severity of consequences score of population
exposed to landslide is 1.2.
Risk Score

The population exposed to high landslide, specifically in Barangay Hubasan the Risk
Score is 10 while the remaining barangays which has “low” and “moderate” Risk Category
ranges from 3.0 – 8.0. The average Risk Score is 5.32 which is interpreted as “moderate”.
This indicates that the population exposed to flooding are moderately at risk to the
potential negative consequences of landslide events.
POPULATION AT RISK TO LANDSLIDE

Amaga Seven barangays Exposed population are -Construction of slope

An-an located in the upland vulnerable to the on-set protection infrastructures;
Cabulisan or at least with portion and adverse effects of
Hubasan in the upland like landslide. -Strict implementation of
Navalita barangay Sagbok are policies and no building of
Plaridel moderately at – risk to dwelling units in landslide
Sagbok landslide critical areas and steep
slopes;
-Relocate highly
vulnerable communities
POPULATION EXPOSED TO STORM SURGE

Hazard
The Mines and Geosciences Bureau (MGB) Maps, indicates that there are twelve (12)
barangays in the municipality that are prone to storm surge. These barangays are Ambao,
An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan, Navalita,
Sabang and Sagbok. Among these barangays, only Barangay An-an and Navalita has
“low” storm surge susceptibility while the rest has “moderate” and “high” storm surge
susceptibility. Based on anecdotal accounts, storm surge events occurred in the
municipality, however it is only in coastal barangays. In this assessment, we use the
inundation models and projections of the University of the Philippines – Nationwide
Operational Assessment of Hazards (Project UP-NOAH) which is based on storm surge
Number 4 which is considered as the worst-case scenario where the storm surge height
is five (5) meters.
Exposure
the total number of household count in the municipality is 3,488 and 1,804 or 51.72% of
the total household are exposed to storm surge. Among these, 87 households or 4.82%
has LOW storm surge susceptibility, 215 households or 11.92% with MODERATE storm

surge susceptibility, 1,502 households or 83.26% has HIGH storm surge susceptibility
and there was no household affected with VERY HIGH storm surge susceptibility.
Barangay Lungsodaan has the highest percentage of exposed household with 379 or
21% of the total affected household and with HIGH storm surge susceptibility of 364, this
is because it is located along the banks of Camungaan and Bito rivers though it is not
located along the coast. On the other hand, Barangay An-an has the least percentage of
exposed household of 1 or 0.06% of the total affected household with LOW storm surge
susceptibility.
Sensitivity
Assessing the sensitivity of the exposed household and population in storm surge prone
settlers, 790 households are living in houses made of light materials, 1,556 of the exposed
population are young and 770 are old dependents, 233 are persons with disabilities
(PWDs), 986 households are living below the poverty threshold and 27 are malnourished
individuals.
There are 790 exposed households to storm surge who are living in dwelling units made
of light materials, 183 of these are in Barangay Lungsodaan which comprises 23.2% of
the affected households living in dwelling units made of light materials, followed by
Barangay District II which has 110 households or 13.9% of the affected households living
in light materials dwelling units and Barangay Baculod and District III which has 98
households or 12.4 % of the total households who lived in dwelling units made of light
materials. The sensitivity score of households exposed to storm surge who are living in
dwelling units made from light materials has an average of 3.7 out of 4.
The total exposed population to storm surge accounted to 6,909 or 51% of the total
households to storm surge with young and old dependents has an average of 3.9 out of4.
The municipality has a total of 233 Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) or 3.37% of the total
affected population who are exposed to storm surge. Barangay Lungsodaan has the
highest number of 79 PWDs or 33.9% of the total exposed persons with disabilities. It
was followed by Barangay Ambao with 25 PWDs or 10.7% of the total exposed PWDs
and Barangay District III with 24 PWDs or 10.3% of the total exposed persons with
disabilities. It is also noted that Barangay Biasong and Navalita has no recorded PWD
who is exposed or affected to storm surge. The average sensitivity score is quite low at
1.27 out of 4.

Of the exposed households in storm surge susceptible areas, 986 households declared
that they are living below the poverty threshold. All affected barangays have exposed
households living below the poverty threshold except Biasong. Barangay Lungsodaan
take the lead as the highest with 271 households or 27.5% of the total exposed household
to storm surge living below the poverty threshold, followed by Barangay Baculod with 161
households or 16.3% of the total exposed household to storm surge living below the
poverty threshold and Barangay Ambao with 93 households or 9.4% of the total exposed
household to storm surge living below the poverty threshold. The sensitivity score is quite
high at 3.7 out of 4.
Among the households exposed to storm surge, there are twenty - seven (27) household
members (5 years old and below) who are malnourished individuals found in six (6) out
of the twelve (12) affected barangays. Barangay Baculod has the highest number of 9 or
33.3% of the total malnourished individuals, it is followed by Barangay Lungsodaan and
Barangay Sabang with 5 or 18.5% of the total malnourished individuals and Barangay
Ambao with 4 or 14.8% of the total malnourished individuals. Considering all the affected
barangays, the sensitivity score of exposed households to storm surge with malnourished
individuals is manageable at 1 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
Looking into the adaptive capacity of households exposed to storm surge, which includes
All households exposed to storm surge answered that they have access to infrastructure
– related mitigation measures. This manifests that they have been benefited with the
infrastructure projects initiated by the government to mitigate the adverse effects of storm
surge. The corresponding adaptive capacity score on this area is 4.
or in kind is readily available and accessible by the affected households. This area has
households is at 38.73% and has a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 3.27 out of
4. The strong mindset of property ownership or landholdings and the unwillingness to
relocate and start all over again is common reason among households exposed to storm
surge that hinders in implementing relocation measures. Though, these households
cannot easily be relocated, but they are more willing to retrofit their dwelling or housing
units, if they have the financial capacity.

In access to information, 95.14% of households exposed to storm surge claimed that they
have access to information with a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 3.86 out of 4.
adaptive capacity. However, there are still households in far flung areas that cannot be
reached with the vital information because of signal constraints and inaccessibility to local
public address system.
Government investment is MODERATE with an adaptive capacity score of 2. With the
LGU’s dependency to IRA, it can only invest a reasonable amount in CCA – DRR because
there are also other sectors and priorities to be addressed. As such, only minimal funds
Vulnerability Score
Considering the exposure data in high storm surge, the coastal barangays such as
Ambao, District I, District II, Sabang, Sagbok, Lungsodaan, part of District III and Baculod
are the most exposed with 4.0 exposure score and vulnerability score of 0.50 while the
least exposed and vulnerable is Barangay Cat-iwing with 2.0 exposure score and 0.50
vulnerability score. On the other hand, areas with low exposure to storm surge, the
vulnerable barangays are An-an, Biasong and Navalita with exposure score ranging from
0.33 to 0.66 and 0.50 vulnerability score. The overall exposure score is 2.06 and
vulnerability score of 0.50.
Taken into consideration the population with high exposure to storm surge in susceptible
areas, most of the affected are the coastal barangays namely, Ambao, District I, District
II, Sabang, Sagbok and Lungsodaan which have the highest Severity of Consequence
score with 2.0, while the rest of the barangays have a severity score of 1.0. Overall, the
severity of consequences score of population exposed to storm surge is 1.45.
Risk Score
The population exposed to high storm surge, all coastal barangays namely, Ambao,
District I, District II, Sabang, Sagbok and Lungsodaan have a Risk Score of 10.0 and has
Risk Category of “moderate”, the remaining barangays has a Risk Score of 3.0 – 4.0
which has a Risk Category of “low”. The average Risk Score is 6.23 interpreted as
“moderate”. This indicates that the population exposed to storm surge are moderately at
risk to the potential negative consequences of storm surge events.

POPULATION AT RISK TO STORM SURGE

Ambao Coastal barangays are Vulnerable to the on-set -Implement strictly the no
Baculod moderately at risk to and adverse impacts of dwelling zone policy in
Cat-iwing storm surge disaster, likely to incur 20m easement zone;
District I injuries and damage to
District II property, loss of - Institutionalization of
District III livelihood even loss of evacuation policies;
Lungsodaan life.
Sabang - Construction of shoreline
Sagbok protection infrastructures;
- Intensification of beach
forestation and mangrove
plantation activities;
- Installation of informative/
instructive and
demarcation signages
POPULATION EXPOSED TO LIQUEFACTION

Hazard
The Mines and Geoscience Bureau Ready Project Maps, indicate that there are thirteen
(13) barangays in the municipality that are prone to liquefaction. These barangays are
Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III,
Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang and Sagbok. Among these barangays, only Barangay
Cat-iwing has “moderate” liquefaction susceptibility while most of the barangays has
“high” liquefaction susceptibility. Based on anecdotal accounts, there was no identified
liquefaction events occurred in the municipality, however MGB maps showed that the
municipality is vulnerable to this hazard. In this assessment, we use the MGB map which
was based on the geology, presence of active faults, historical accounts of liquefaction,
geomorphology and hydrology of the area and preliminary microtremor survey data
utilized to validate type of underlying materials.
the total number of household count in the municipality is 3,488 and 2,362 or 67.72% of
the total household are exposed to liquefaction. Among these, 235 households or 9.95%
with MODERATE liquefaction susceptibility, 2,127 households or 90.95% has HIGH

liquefaction susceptibility and there was no household affected with LOW as well as
VERY HIGH liquefaction susceptibility.
Barangay Lungsodaan has the highest percentage of exposed household with 379 or
16.05% of the total affected household and with HIGH liquefaction susceptibility of the
same number of affected households while Barangay An-an has the least percentage of
exposed household of 18 or 0.76% of the total affected household with HIGH liquefaction
susceptibility. On the other hand, Barangay Cat-iwing recorded 134 or 5.67% of the total
affected household with MODERATE liquefaction susceptibility.
Sensitivity
Assessing the sensitivity of the exposed household and population in liquefaction prone
settlers, 1,151 households are living in houses made of light materials, 2,094 of the
exposed population are young and 937 are old dependents, 299 are persons with
disabilities (PWDs), 1,459 households are living below the poverty threshold and 42 are
malnourished individuals.
There are 1,151 exposed households to liquefaction who are living in dwelling units made
of light materials, 183 of these are in Barangay Lungsodaan which comprises 15.9% of
the affected households living in dwelling units made of light materials, followed by
Barangay Ambao which has 154 households or 13.4% of the affected households living
in light materials dwelling units and Barangay Baculod which has 134 households or 11.6
% of the total households who lived in dwelling units made of light materials. The
sensitivity score of households exposed to storm surge who are living in dwelling units
made from light materials is 4 out of 4.
The total exposed population to liquefaction accounted to 8,993 or 66.38% of the total
households to liquefaction with young and old dependents is 4 out of 4.
The municipality has a total of 299 Persons with Disabilities (PWDs) or 3.3% of the total
affected population who are exposed to liquefaction. Barangay Lungsodaan has the
highest number of 79 PWDs or 26.4% of the total exposed persons with disabilities. It
was followed by Barangay Ambao with 30 PWDs or 11.7% of the total exposed PWDs
and Barangay Baculod with 30 PWDs or 10% of the total exposed persons with
disabilities. The average sensitivity score is quite low at 1.14 out of 4.
Of the exposed households in liquefaction susceptible areas, 1,459 households declared
that they are living below the poverty threshold. All affected barangays have exposed
households living below the poverty threshold. Barangay Lungsodaan took the lead as

the highest with 271 households or 18.6% of the total exposed household to liquefaction
living below the poverty threshold, followed by Barangay Baculod with 224 households or
15.4% of the total exposed household to liquefaction living below the poverty threshold
and Barangay Ambao with 172 households or 11.8% of the total exposed household to
liquefaction living below the poverty threshold. The sensitivity score is quite high at 4 out
of 4.
Among the households exposed to liquefaction, there are forty - two (42) household
members (5 years old and below) who are malnourished individuals found in eight (8) out
of the thirteen (13) affected barangays. Barangay Baculod has the highest number of 9
or 21.4% of the total malnourished individuals, it is followed by Barangay Ambao with 7
or 16.7% of the total malnourished individuals and Barangay Biasong with 6 or 14.3% of
the total malnourished individuals. Considering all the affected barangays, the sensitivity
score of exposed households to liquefaction with malnourished individuals is manageable
at 1 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
Looking into the adaptive capacity of households exposed to liquefaction, which includes
All households exposed to liquefaction answered that they can access to infrastructure –
liquefaction. The corresponding adaptive capacity score on this area is 4.
or in kind is readily available and accessible by the affected households. This area has
households is at 33.71% and has a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 3.79 out of
4. The strong mindset of property ownership or landholdings and the unwillingness to
relocate and start all over again is common reason among households exposed to
liquefaction that hinders in implementing relocation measures. Though, these households
cannot easily be relocated, but they are more willing to retrofit their dwelling or housing
units, if they have the financial capacity.
In access to information, 99.40% of households exposed to liquefaction claimed that they
have access to information with a corresponding adaptive capacity score of 4 out of 4.

adaptive capacity. However, there are still households in far flung areas that cannot be
reached with the vital information because of signal constraints and inaccessibility to local
public address system.
Government investment is MODERATE with an adaptive capacity score of 2. With the
LGU’s dependency to IRA, it can only invest a reasonable amount in CCA – DRR because
there are also other sectors and priorities to be addressed. As such, only minimal funds
Vulnerability Score
Considering the exposure data in high liquefaction, barangays such as Ambao, Baculod,
Biasong, Bugho, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan, Navalita and Sabang are
the most exposed with 4.0 exposure score and vulnerability score of 0.50, while barangay
An-an and part of barangay Sagbok are less exposed with exposure score of 3.0 and
vulnerability score of 0.50. On the other hand, areas with moderate exposure to
liquefaction, are Barangay Cat-iwing and part of Barangay Sagbok with exposure score
of 2.64 and 0.50 vulnerability score. The overall exposure score is 3.66 and vulnerability
score of 0.50.
Taken into consideration the population with high exposure to liquefaction in susceptible
areas, most of the affected are the thirteen barangays namely, Ambao, An-an, Baculod,
Biasong, Bugho, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang
and Sagbok which have the Severity of Consequence score of 2.0. Overall, the severity
of consequences score of population exposed to liquefaction is 2.0.
Risk Score
The population exposed to liquefaction in the following barangays; Ambao, An-an,
Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang
and part of Sagbok have a Risk Score of 10.0 and has Risk Category of “moderate” while
barangay Cat-iwing and remaining part of Sagbok has a Risk Score of 8.0 which likewise
has a Risk Category of “moderate”. The average Risk Score is 9.71 interpreted as
“moderate”. This indicates that the population exposed to liquefaction are moderately at
risk to the potential negative consequences of liquefaction events.
POPULATION AT RISK TO LIQUEFACTION

Ambao
An-an Population of twelve Exposed population and
Baculod (12) barangays are households are

Biasong moderately at risk to vulnerable to the onset -Implementation of the “No

Bugho liquefaction and adverse effect of building permit, no
Cat-iwing liquefaction. construction policy”;
District I Injuries, damage to
District II properties, loss of life -Enforcement of existing
District III and livelihood are likely policies and guidelines
Lungsodaan to happen. related to construction of
Sabang dwelling units as aligned to
Sagbok national laws such as the
National Building Code
URBAN USE AREAS EXPOSED TO FLOODING

Hazard
Based on the flooding hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geosciences Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are sixteen (16) barangays that has urban use areas
such as Residential, Commercial, Institutional, Agro-Industrial, Infrastructure, Tourism as
well as Parks and Open Spaces that are exposed to flooding. Only Barangay Plaridel has
no urban use areas exposed to flooding. And based from anecdotal accounts, the
likelihood of occurrence of flooding in these areas has an average score of 4.35 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, 35% of the total Residential areas are
exposed to LOW flooding, 49% with MODERATE flooding susceptibility, 10% with HIGH
susceptibility to flooding and 6% are exposed to VERY HIGH flooding susceptibility. Of
the total Residential Area of 59.7 hectares, 54.8 hectares or 91.76% is affected with
flooding.
For Commercial areas, there is a total of 3.5 hectares and 74.5% or 2.6 hectares are
exposed to flooding. 40% is exposed to LOW flooding, 45% with MODERATE flooding
susceptibility, 14% with HIGH susceptibility to flooding and 1% are exposed to VERY
HIGH flooding susceptibility.
There is a total of 15.9 hectares for Institutional areas and 13.3 hectares or 83.38% of it
is affected with flooding. Of the total exposed Institutional Area 22% is exposed to LOW
flooding, 76% with MODERATE flooding susceptibility and 2% with HIGH flooding
susceptibility.
For Agro-Industrial areas, a total of 0.8 hectare is allocated for this land use and 0.57
hectares or 66.95% is affected with flooding. 97% with MODERATE flooding susceptibility
and 3% with HIGH susceptibility to flooding.
For Infrastructure and Utilities areas, there is a total of 1.3 hectares allocated and 73.06%
or 0.96 hectare of it is affected with flooding, 44% is exposed to LOW flooding, 40% with
MODERATE flooding susceptibility, 12% with HIGH susceptibility to flooding and 4% are
exposed to VERY HIGH flooding susceptibility.

For Tourism areas of 3.6 hectares only 17.5% or 0.63 hectares is exposed to flooding,
73% with HIGH susceptibility to flooding and 27% are exposed to VERY HIGH flooding
susceptibility.
For Parks and Open spaces which has a total land area of 0.48 hectares, 100% of it is
exposed to LOW flooding. Likewise, the cemetery which has total land area of 2.5
hectares is affected with MODERATE exposure to flooding.
The total average exposure score of urban use areas to flooding is at 2.00 out of 4.
Sensitivity
Based on the result of the assessment, an estimated of 8% of the buildings located in the
exposed urban land use areas have walls made up of light to salvageable materials. The
estimated percentage of buildings in dilapidated or condemned condition is at 1%. And
the percentage of structures not employing resilient building design is estimated at 8%.
The rounded up average sensitivity score of structures in urban use areas exposed to
flooding is 1.45 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
In measuring the adaptive capacity, there are seven (7) areas that must be considered
such as; percentage of structures with no access/ area coverage to infrastructure related
mitigation measures, local awareness, capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate,
insurance coverage, government investments, available alternative sites/ structures and
government regulations on hazard mitigation zoning and structural design standards.
It was estimated that 73% of the structures in urban use areas do not have access or with
no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as flooding is
concerned. Local awareness is estimated at 99% based on the assessment conducted.
The capacity and willingness to retrofit is estimated at 59%. On the area of insurance
coverage, the score is quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of the structures in urban use
area have no insurance coverage. While on the area of government investments, the
score is 2 out of 4, for the local government has moderate and minimal investments on
CCA/ DRR which can also be attributed to the limited financial capacity and high
dependency to internal revenue allotment (IRA). Likewise, on the area of available
alternative sites/ structures the adaptive capacity score is 2 out of 4 which means the
adaptive capacity on this particular area is moderate.
Government regulations on hazard mitigation zoning and structural design standards is
at category B, for the local government has already implemented existing policies and
structural designs on hazard mitigation. The average adaptive capacity score is 2.00 out
of 4.00.
Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on the urban use areas in the municipality affected with
flooding, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 2.06 and vulnerability

score of 0.36. It might not be alarming but it has to be given attention and priorities as to
the enhancement of the existing structures within said urban use areas as well as the
implementation of key policy options.
The average severity of consequence score of urban use areas to flooding is 1.14 out of
4. The percentage of urban use areas that have the highest severity consequence score
of 3 is about 2.86% and the remaining 97.14% of the urban use areas has the severity of
consequence score of 1 or 2.
Risk Score
Based on the results of the assessment, the average risk score of urban use areas
exposed to flooding is 5.03 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that such
structures in the urban use areas are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects of
flooding. However, there are some structures in urban use areas that have high risk
scores ranging from 15.0 to 18.0 which means that these structures are HIGHLY at risk
to the adverse effects of flooding. The aforesaid urban use areas are located in Barangay
An-an, Cat-iwing and Sabang.
URBAN USE AREAS AT RISK TO FLOODING

An-an There are three (3) High probability of -Improvement/

Cat-iwing barangays which property damages Rehabilitation/
Sabang urban use areas are at especially those Standardization of
risk to HIGH flooding structures made up of drainage system within the
light materials and urban use areas;
dilapidated -Strict implementation of
infrastructures. SWM;
-Strict enforcement of
existing zoning regulations
and national building code
re: easement and setback
especially in new
constructions;
-Procurement of lot
intended for Relocation
Site of affected urban use
areas;
-Relocate communities
further inland or away from
flood basin;
-Construction of flood
control, coastal and
riverbank protection
infrastructures;
-Conduct regular river,
coastal clean-up, de-
clogging of waterways
activities;
URBAN USE AREAS EXPOSED TO LANDSLIDE

Hazard
Based on the landslide hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geosciences Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are twelve (12) barangays that has urban use areas
well as Parks and Open Spaces that are exposed to landslide. These barangays include
Amaga, Ambao, An-an, Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan, Cat-iwing, Hubasan, Navalita,
Plaridel, Sabang and Sagbok. And based from anecdotal accounts, the likelihood of
occurrence of landslide in these areas has an average score of 3.96 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, it has been noted that 29% of the total
Residential areas are exposed to LOW landslide, 64% with MODERATE landslide
susceptibility and 7% with HIGH susceptibility to landslide. Of the total Residential Area
of 24.1 hectares of the twelve barangays, 23.1 hectares or 96.06% is affected with
landslide.
exposed to landslide. 10% is exposed to LOW landslide, 49% with MODERATE landslide
susceptibility and 42% with HIGH exposure to landslide.
is affected with landslide. Of the total exposed Institutional Area 30% is exposed to LOW
landslide, 63% with MODERATE landslide susceptibility and 7% with HIGH landslide
susceptibility.
For Agro-Industrial areas, a total of 0.28 hectare is allocated for this land use and 0.16
hectare or 58.50% is affected with landslide. 21% with MODERATE landslide
susceptibility and 79% with HIGH exposure to landslide.
For Infrastructure and Utilities areas, there is a total of 0.35 hectare allocated and 12.88%
or 0.05 of it is affected with landslide, and 100% of the total urban use area is exposed to
MODERATE landslide susceptibility.
For Tourism areas of 1.2 hectares only 38.87% or 0.46 hectare is exposed to landslide,
77% with MODERATE landslide susceptibility and 23% with HIGH susceptibility to
landslide.
The Parks and Open spaces urban use area which has a total of 0.48 hectare as well as
the cemetery is not exposed to landslide.
The total average exposure score of urban use areas to landslide is at 2.26 out of 4.
Sensitivity
Based on the result of the assessment, an estimated of 16% of the buildings located in
the exposed urban land use areas to landslide have walls made up of light to salvageable
materials. The estimated percentage of buildings in dilapidated or condemned condition
is at 2%. And the percentage of structures not employing resilient building design is

estimated at 16%. The rounded up average sensitivity score of structures in urban use
areas exposed to landslide is 1.71 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
It was estimated that 100% of the structures in urban use areas do not have access or
with no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as landslide is
concerned. Local awareness is estimated at 43% based on the assessment conducted.
coverage, the score is quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of the structures in urban use
adaptive capacity on this particular area is moderate.
structural designs on hazard mitigation. The average adaptive capacity score is 2.00 out
of 4.00.
Vulnerability Score
Considering the data on the urban use areas in the municipality affected with landslide,
the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 2.23 and vulnerability score of
0.42. It might not be alarming but it has to be given attention and priorities as to the
enhancement of the existing structures within said urban use areas as well as the
implementation of key policy options.
The average severity of consequence score of urban use areas exposed to landslide is
1.25 out of 4. The percentage of urban use areas that have the highest severity
consequence score of 3 is about 2.08% and the remaining 97.92% of the urban use areas
which has the severity of consequence score of 1 or 2.
Risk Score
exposed to landslide is 5.00 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that
structures in the urban use areas are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects of

landslide. However, there are some structures in urban use areas that have high risk
scores of 15.0 which means that these structures are HIGHLY at risk to the adverse
effects of landslide. The aforesaid urban use areas, particularly residential, which are
located in Barangay Hubasan.
URBAN USE AREAS AT RISK TO LANDSLIDE

-Strict implementation of
Hubasan One (1) barangay with Residents/ inhabitants as policies imposed on
urban use areas well as infrastructures landslide prone areas;
HIGHLY at risk to and utilities are highly at
Landslide risk to landslide and -Implementation of
subject to its adverse landslide -resilient
effects. structural designs in low to
medium landslide exposed
urban use areas;
-Construction of slope
protection, river
revetments in landslide
prone areas;
-Implementation of green
engineering activities i.e.
reforestation/ re-planting of
trees in landslide exposed
urban use areas to prevent
erosion;
-Relocation of
communities highly at risk
to landslide;
URBAN USE AREAS EXPOSED TO STORM SURGE

Hazard
Based on the storm surge hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geosciences Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are eleven (11) barangays that has urban use areas
well as Parks and Open Spaces that are exposed to storm surge. These barangays
include Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan,
Navalita, Sabang and Sagbok. And based from anecdotal accounts, the likelihood of
occurrence of storm surge in these areas has an average score of 4.38 out of 6.
Exposure

Based on the recently conducted assessment, 7% of the total Residential areas are
exposed to LOW storm surge, 16% with MODERATE storm surge susceptibility, and 78%
with HIGH susceptibility to storm surge. Of the total Residential Area of 44.9 hectares of
the exposed barangay, 43.9 hectares or 97.75% is affected with storm surge.
exposed to storm surge. 7% is exposed to LOW storm surge, 6% with MODERATE storm
surge susceptibility and 87% with HIGH susceptibility to storm surge.
is exposed to storm surge. Of the total exposed Institutional Area, 6% is exposed to LOW
storm surge susceptibility, 12% with MODERATE storm surge susceptibility and 82% with
HIGH storm surge exposure.
For Agro-Industrial areas, a total of 0.6 hectare is allocated for this land use and 100% of
it is affected with storm surge, which 19% is exposed with MODERATE storm surge
susceptibility and 81% with HIGH exposure to storm surge.
For Tourism areas of 6.8 hectares only 38.23% or 2.6 hectares is exposed to storm surge.
Of the total, 15% is exposed to LOW storm surge susceptibility and 85% with HIGH
exposure to storm surge.
For Infrastructure and Utilities areas, Parks and Open spaces as well as the cemetery is
not expose to storm surge.
The total average exposure score of urban use areas to flooding is at 2.00 out of 4.
Sensitivity
the exposed urban land use areas to storm surge have walls made up of light to
salvageable materials. The estimated percentage of buildings in dilapidated or
condemned condition is at 2%. And the percentage of structures not employing resilient
building design is estimated at 10%. The rounded up average sensitivity score of
structures in urban use areas exposed to storm surge is 1.46 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
with no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as storm surge
is concerned. Local awareness is estimated at 100% based on the assessment
conducted. The capacity and willingness to retrofit is estimated at 87%. On the area of
insurance coverage, the score is quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of the structures in

urban use area have no insurance coverage. While on the area of government
investments, the score is 2 out of 4, for the local government has moderate and minimal
investments on CCA/ DRR which can also be attributed to the limited financial capacity
and high dependency to internal revenue allotment (IRA). Likewise, on the area of
available alternative sites/ structures the adaptive capacity score is 2 out of 4 which
means the adaptive capacity on this particular area is moderate.
structural designs on hazard mitigation but not on its fullest. The average adaptive
capacity score is 2.00 out of 4.00.
Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on the urban use areas in the municipality affected with
storm surge, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 2.99 and
vulnerability score of 0.36. It might not be that alarming but it has to be given attention
and priorities as to the enhancement of the existing structures within said urban use areas
as well as the implementation of key policy options.
The average severity of consequence score of urban use areas to storm surge is 1.36 out
of 4. The percentage of urban use areas that have the highest severity consequence
score of 3 is about 16% and the remaining 84% of the urban use areas has the severity
of consequence score of either 1 or 2.
Risk Score
exposed to storm surge is 6.13 which has Risk Category interpreted as MODERATE, this
indicates that such structures in the urban use areas are MODERATELY at risk to the
adverse effects of storm surge. However, there are some structures in urban use areas
that have high risk scores of 15.0 which means that these structures are HIGHLY at risk
to the adverse effects of storm surge. The aforesaid urban use areas are located in
Barangay Ambao, Baculod, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan,
Sabang and Sagbok.
URBAN USE AREAS AT RISK TO STORM SURGE

Ambao Nine (9) barangays High probability of -Relocation of affected

Baculod with urban use areas damages, injuries, loss structures in urban use
Cat-iwing that are HIGHLY at of lives and livelihood; areas;
District I risk to Storm Surge -No further developments
District II Coastal soil erosion and in urban use areas with
District III degradation high risk to storm surge;

Lungsodaan -Intensification of Beach

Sabang and Mangrove
Sagbok Reforestation as natural
barriers to storm surge;
-Update design standards
to integrate protected
sea/river level rise and
storm surge so as fortify
embankments to
counteract effects of
increased sea/riverside
erosion on tourism land
use areas;
-Construction of municipal
bay walk/ sea wall along
coastal barangays;
-Update policies for
coastal land use to
establish natural buffer
zones;
-Establishment of
waterfront/ beachfront
esplanade;
URBAN USE AREAS EXPOSED TO LIQUEFACTION

Hazard
Based on the liquefaction hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geosciences Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are thirteen (13) barangays that has urban use areas
well as Parks and Open Spaces that are exposed to liquefaction. These barangays
include Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cat-iwing, District I, District II, District
III, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang and Sagbok. And based from anecdotal accounts, the
likelihood of occurrence of flooding in these areas has an average score of 4.64 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, of the total Residential Area of 36.5
hectares of the thirteen barangays, 35.6 hectares or 97.62% is exposed to liquefaction;
and 27% of the total Residential areas are exposed to LOW liquefaction and 73% with
HIGH susceptibility to liquefaction.
exposed to liquefaction, the 7% is exposed to LOW liquefaction hazard and the remaining
93% is with HIGH susceptibility to liquefaction.
There is a total of 13.1 hectares for Institutional areas and 99.98% of it is exposed to
liquefaction. Of the total exposed Institutional Area 9% has LOW liquefaction exposure
while 91% has HIGH liquefaction susceptibility.
For Agro-Industrial areas, a total of 0.57 hectare is allocated for this land use and 100%
has HIGH exposure to liquefaction.

For Tourism areas of 2.03 hectares only 74.73% or 1.51 hectare is exposed to
liquefaction, 16% with LOW susceptibility to liquefaction and 84% are exposed to HIGH
liquefaction susceptibility.
For Infrastructure and Utilities areas, Parks and Open spaces as well as the cemetery
there is no assessed exposure to liquefaction.
The total average exposure score of urban use areas to liquefaction is at 2.50 out of 4.
Sensitivity
the exposed urban land use areas to liquefaction have walls made up of light to
salvageable materials. The estimated percentage of buildings in dilapidated or
condemned condition is at 3%. And the percentage of structures not employing resilient
building design is estimated at 15%. The rounded up average sensitivity score of
structures in urban use areas exposed to liquefaction is 1.60 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
with no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as liquefaction
is concerned. Local awareness is estimated at 97% based on the assessment conducted.
coverage, the score is quite low at 1 out of 4 because all of the structures in urban use
adaptive capacity on this particular area is moderate. Government regulations on hazard
mitigation zoning and structural design standards is at category B, for the local
government has already implemented existing policies and structural designs on hazard
mitigation. The average adaptive capacity score is 2.00 out of 4.00.
Vulnerability Score
Considering the data on the urban use areas in the municipality affected with liquefaction,

0.39. This result is quite high and alarming so, it has to be given attention and priorities
especially in the field of further research and assessments, as well as to the enhancement
of the existing structures within said urban use areas and the implementation of key policy
options.
The average severity of consequence score of urban use areas to liquefaction is 1.49 out
of 4. The percentage of urban use areas that have the highest severity consequence
score of 3 is about 24% and the remaining 76% of the urban use areas has the severity
of consequence score of either 1 or 2.
Risk Score
exposed to liquefaction is 7.13 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that
such structures in the urban use areas are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects
of liquefaction. However, there are some structures in urban use areas that have high risk
scores of 15.0 which means that these structures are HIGHLY at risk to the adverse
effects of liquefaction. The aforesaid urban use areas are located in Barangay Ambao,
An-an, Biasong, Bugho, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang
and Sagbok.
URBAN USE AREAS AT RISK TO LIQUEFACTION

Ambao Eleven (11) barangays Affects the structural -Enforcement of existing

An-an with urban use areas integrity of infrastructures policies and guidelines
Biasong at risk to HIGH in urban use areas related to resilient building
Bugho Liquefaction design as aligned to
District I national laws;
District II
District III -Strict implementation of
Lungsodaan “No Permit, No
Navalita Construction Policy”
Sabang
Sagbok
PRODUCTION AREAS EXPOSED TO FLOODING

Hazard
Based on the flooding hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience Bureau (MGB),
it was found out that there are fifteen (15) barangays that contained production areas
particularly ricefields that are exposed to flooding. Based from anecdotal accounts and

data, the likelihood of occurrence of flooding in these areas has an average score of 4.52
out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, 75.98 hectares or 16% of rice production
areas are exposed to LOW flooding, 344.93 hectares or 73% of production areas with
MODERATE flooding susceptibility, 17.67 hectares or 4% of production areas with HIGH
susceptibility to flooding and 36.69 hectares or 8% of the production areas are exposed
to VERY HIGH flooding susceptibility. The average exposure score of production areas
exposed to flooding is at 1.3 out of 4.
Sensitivity
Most of the affected production areas are without water impounding for agricultural
croplands and ricelands. And 36% of the affected production areas do not have irrigation
facilities for agricultural croplands and ricelands. Furthermore, it is estimated that 50% of
the owners are not employing sustainable production technique standards. The rounded
up average sensitivity score of production areas exposed to flooding is 2.46 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
In measuring the adaptive capacity, there are six (6) areas that must be considered
namely; percentage of dependent households with access to alternative livelihood,
percentage of affected areas covered or protected by hazard mitigation measures/
structures, percentage of production areas covered by post-disaster economic protection,
percentage of areas with access to information, government extension programs related
to CCAM-DRR and government infrastructure projects related to CCAM-DRR.
Based on the survey most of the dependent households answered that they have access
to alternative livelihood; majority of the production areas are covered with hazard
mitigation structures such as slope protection, line canals and the like; mostly are covered
with post-disaster economic protection like insurance; and 100% of production areas
have access to information. While on the areas of government extension programs and
infrastructure projects related to CCAM-DRR, the score is 2 out of 4, for the local
government has moderate and minimal investments on CCA/ DRR which can also be
attributed to the limited financial capacity and high dependency to internal revenue
allotment (IRA). The average adaptive capacity score is 3.00 out of 4.00.
Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on the production areas in the municipality affected with
flooding, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 1 and vulnerability
mitigation and insurance of said production areas as it affects food safety and security in
the municipality.

The average severity of consequence score of production areas exposed to flooding is

1.04 out of 4. The percentage of production areas that have the highest severity
consequence score of 2 is about 4.35% and the remaining 95.65% of the production areas
has the severity of consequence score of 1.
Risk Score
Based on the results of the assessment, the average risk score of production areas
exposed to flooding is 4.7 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that such
areas are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects of flooding. These production
areas are located in barangays Amaga, Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho,
Cabulisan, Cat-iwing, District II and III, Hubasan, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Sabang and
Sagbok.
NATURAL RESOURCE BASED PRODUCTION AREAS AT RISK TO FLOODING

Amaga Fifteen (15) barangays Destruction of crops -Adopt new technology

Ambao with production areas which decreases yield and plant flood resilient
An-an MODERATELY at risk that has negative impact varieties;
Baculod to Flooding on food security. -Construction/
Biasong improvement of spate
Bugho irrigation and inundation
Cabulisan canals used to divert the
Cat-iwing water from rice fields to
District II nearby farmlands;
District III -Policies should be
Hubasan implemented at the
Lungsodaan community level
Navalita precluding the people from
Sabang excavating, removing
Sagbok materials from the soil
and/or cutting of trees;
PRODUCTION AREAS EXPOSED TO LANDSLIDE

Hazard
Based on the landslide hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are eleven (11) barangays that contained production
areas particularly ricefields that are exposed to landslide. Based from anecdotal accounts
and data, the likelihood of occurrence of landslide in these areas has an average score
of 4 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, 9.8 hectares or 37% of rice production
areas are exposed to LOW landslide, 13.3 hectares or 50% of production areas with
MODERATE landslide susceptibility, 3.5 hectares or 13% of production areas with HIGH

landslide susceptibility. The average exposure score of production areas exposed to

landslide is at 1 out of 4.
Sensitivity
Most of the affected production areas are without water impounding for agricultural
facilities for agricultural croplands and ricelands. Furthermore, it is estimated that 50% of
the owners are not employing sustainable production technique standards. The rounded
up average sensitivity score of production areas exposed to landslide is 4 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
allotment (IRA). The average adaptive capacity score is 3.00 out of 4.00
Vulnerability Score
landslide, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 0.66 and vulnerability
mitigation and insurance of said production areas as it affects food safety and security in
the municipality.
The average severity of consequence score of production areas exposed to landslide is
1 out of 4, this means that all production areas have the highest severity consequence
score of 1.
Risk Score
exposed to landslide is 4 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that such

areas are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects of landslide. These production
areas are located in barangays Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan, Cat-iwing and Hubasan.
NATURAL RESOURCE BASED PRODUCTION AREAS AT RISK TO LANDSLIDE

Biasong Five (5) barangays Damage to crops that -Construction of slope

Bugho with production areas lead to decrease in yield/ protection structures;
Cabulisan at risk to MODERATE production eventually -Intensification of tree
Cat-iwing Landslide affects food security and planting activities along
Hubasan stability. riverbanks and landslide
prone areas;
-Strict implementation of
“No Extraction, No
Excavation Policy”;
PRODUCTION AREAS EXPOSED TO STORM SURGE

Hazard
Based on the storm surge hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are eleven (11) barangays that contained production
areas particularly ricefields that are exposed to storm surge. Based from anecdotal
accounts and data, the likelihood of occurrence of storm surge in these areas has an
average score of 4 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, 37.8 hectares or 15% of production areas
are exposed to LOW storm surge, 57.4 hectares or 23% of production areas with
MODERATE storm surge susceptibility, 158.5 hectares or 62% of production areas with
HIGH exposure to storm surge. The average exposure score of production areas exposed
to storm surge is at 1.5 out of 4.
Sensitivity
All affected production areas to storm surge are without water impounding for agricultural
croplands and ricelands. And 24.6% of the affected production areas do not have
irrigation facilities for agricultural croplands and ricelands. Furthermore, it is estimated
that only 50% of the owners are employing sustainable production technique standards.
The rounded up average sensitivity score of production areas exposed to storm surge is
4 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity

Vulnerability Score
storm surge, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 1.07 and
vulnerability score of 0.75. It might not be alarming but it has to be given attention and
priorities as to mitigation and insurance of said production areas as it affects food safety
and security in the municipality.
The average severity of consequence score of production areas exposed to storm surge
is 1.3 out of 4. The percentage of production areas that have the highest severity
consequence score of 3 is about 7% and the remaining 93% of the production areas has
the severity of consequence score of 2 and 1.
Risk Score
exposed to storm surge is 5.5 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that
such production areas are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects of storm surge.
These production areas are located in barangays Ambao, An-an, Biasong, District II and
III, Lungsodaan, Sabang and Sagbok. However, there are two (2) barangays namely
Baculod and Bugho which has part of its production areas are highly exposed to storm
surge with a risk score of 15. This production areas are near water bodies such as rivers
which is directly connected to the sea.
NATURAL RESOURCE BASED PRODUCTION AREAS AT RISK TO STORM SURGE


Baculod Two (2) barangays Intrusion of saline water -Adoption of new

Bugho with production areas in rice fields and techniques such as
at risk to HIGH Storm production areas. varieties resilient and/or
Surge can adapt to higher water
Decreases production salinity;
and yield. -Construction of storm
surge protection barriers/
structures
PRODUCTION AREAS EXPOSED TO LIQUEFACTION

Hazard
Based on the liquefaction hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are thirteen (13) barangays that contained production
areas particularly ricefields that are exposed to liquefaction. Based from anecdotal
accounts and data, the likelihood of occurrence of storm surge in these areas has an
average score of 5 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, 8.37 hectares or 2% of production areas
are exposed to LOW liquefaction, 451.08 hectares or 92% of production areas with HIGH
exposure to liquefaction. The average exposure score of production areas exposed to
liquefaction is at 2.64 out of 4.
Sensitivity
All affected production areas to liquefaction are without water impounding for agricultural
facilities for agricultural croplands and ricelands. Furthermore, it is estimated that only
50% of the owners are employing sustainable production technique standards. The
rounded up average sensitivity score of production areas exposed to liquefaction is 4 out
of 4.
Adaptive Capacity

Vulnerability Score
liquefaction, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 3.4 and
vulnerability score of 0.75. It has to be given attention and priorities as to mitigation and
insurance of said production areas as it affects food safety and security in the municipality.
The average severity of consequence score of production areas exposed to liquefaction
is 2.6 out of 4. The percentage of production areas that have the highest severity
consequence score of 3 is about 79% and the remaining 21% of the production areas has
the severity of consequence score of 1.
Risk Score
exposed to liquefaction is 12.6 which is interpreted as HIGH, this indicates that such
production areas are HIGHLY at risk to the adverse effects of liquefaction. These
production areas are located in barangays Amaga, Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong,
Bugho, District II and III, Lungsodaan, Navalita and Sabang. However, barangay Sagbok
has part of its production areas that is moderately exposed to liquefaction.
NATURAL RESOURCE BASED PRODUCTION AREAS AT RISK TO LIQUEFACTION

Amaga
Ambao Eleven (11) barangays Areas not suitable for -Plant suitable varieties
An-an with production areas planting crops, that can sustain in this kind
Baculod at risk to HIGH unproductive rice fields, of soil;
Biasong Liquefaction lower yields, compromise
Bugho food security -Apply suitable technology
District II such as integration of rice
District III and fish;
Lungsodaan
Navalita -Conversion of affected
Sabang areas into a more valuable
use such as fish pond
which is into food
production.

CRITICAL POINTS FACILITIES EXPOSED TO FLOODING

Hazard
Based on the flooding hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience bureau (MGB),
it was found out that there are ten (10) barangays in the municipality that contained critical
points facilities such as school buildings; barangay halls; health and day care centers;
churches and chapels; watchtowers; solar dryers and other infrastructure that are
exposed to flooding. Likewise, based from anecdotal accounts and data, there is
occurrence of flooding in the locality and that the average score of likelihood of occurrence
is 4.11 out of 5.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, six (6) or 5.17% critical point facilities are
exposed to VERY HIGH flooding, there are twelve (12) or 10.34% critical point facilities
that are exposed to HIGH flooding, sixty-one (61) or 52.59% of the critical point facilities
with MODERATE flooding susceptibility and thirty-one (31) or 26.72% critical point
facilities that has LOW flooding susceptibility. Most of these affected facilities are
barangay halls; health and day care centers and school buildings in multi-grade and
elementary. Government owned infrastructures such as municipal buildings, PNP and
BFP municipal stations, public markets, public transport terminal and the municipal gym
are highly exposed to storm surge. The average exposure score proportionate to the
affected area is 3.91 out of 4.
Sensitivity
Of the affected critical point facilities, 6.90% are in EXCELLENT condition and 83.62% in
GOOD condition, while there are about 6.90% of the affected critical point facilities which
has FAIR condition and 2.59% are in POOR condition. Most of the poorly constructed
critical point facilities were built in the late 1970s to 1990s like the old school buildings in
Hinundayan Central School and there were also made up of light materials such as the
makeshift school buildings in Cat-iwing Multi-grade Elementary School. The excellent and
in good condition facilities were built in the year 2000 onwards and made up of strong
and reliable materials. However, there were only 11.21% of the total facilities which
applied resilient building designs and the rest were constructed without employing

resilient building designs. The rounded up average sensitivity score of critical point
facilities to flooding is 2.47 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
In assessing the adaptive capacity, there are six (6) areas that must be considered
namely; percentage of structures with no access/ area coverage to infrastructure related
mitigation measures, capacity and willingness to retrofit or relocate, insurance coverage,
government investments, available alternative sites/ structures and government
regulations on hazard mitigation zoning and structural design standards.
It was estimated that 56% of the total critical point structures do not have access or with
no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures. Considering, that most of
the critical point facilities are owned/administered by local government units
(barangay/municipal) and/or national government agencies, the capacity and willingness
to retrofit is at category B, which means that the owner/ concerned administrator has the
capacity and willingness to retrofit/ relocate, but in the meantime has no plan yet, because
it’s in the process of acquiring suitable lots and locations. On the area of insurance
coverage, the score is quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of the critically affected
structures has no insurance coverage. While on the area of government investments, the
score is 2 out of 4, for the LGU has moderate investments on CCA/ DRR which can also
be attributed to its limited financial capacity and high dependency to internal revenue
allotment (IRA). On the availability of alternative sites/structures is MODERATE
considering that there are potential areas that can be used as alternative sites for
relocation, however funds to acquire such lots is something that the local government
must be prioritized. Government regulations on hazard mitigation zoning and structural
design standards is at category B, for the local government has already implemented
existing policies and structural designs on hazard mitigation.
Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on critical point facilities and structures of all the affected
barangays to flooding, it was noted that the average hazard exposure score is 2.34 and
vulnerability score of 1.0.
The average severity of consequence score of critical point facilities exposed to flooding
is 1.71 out of 4. Most number of critical points facilities that has the highest severity of
consequence score of 3 are found in Barangay Ambao, District I and Sagbok, these are
local government owned infrastructures such as barangay hall, health and day care
centers.
Risk Score
Based on the results of the assessment, the average risk score of critical point facilities
exposed to flooding is 7.03 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that

majority of the critical point facilities are moderately at risk to the adverse effects of
flooding. However, there Most of these structures and facilities are located in barangays
Lungsodaan, District II and Ambao.
CRITICAL POINT FACILITIES AT RISK TO FLOODING

Ambao Four (4) barangays Higher probability that -Enhancement/

Cat-iwing with Critical Point basic social and health Improvement/ Retrofit
District I Facilities at risk to facilities will be damaged basic social and health
Sagbok HIGH Flooding during disaster impairing facilities;
delivery of basic social -Re-engineering/
and health services. retrofitting of flood
mitigating structures that
School buildings, day protects critical point
care centers and chapels facilities;
which are used as -Relocation of affected
evacuation centers and structures/ critical point
temporary shelters are facilities;
unsafe to be used as -Adoption and
such. enforcement of existing
policies and guidelines
related to resilient building
design as aligned to
national laws and
standards;
-Formulation/
Implementation of
mandatory property
insurance policy;
CRITICAL POINTS FACILITIES EXPOSED TO LANDSLIDE

Hazard
Based on the landslide hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there nine (9) barangays that contained critical points
facilities such as school buildings; barangay halls; health and day care centers; churches
and chapels; watchtowers; solar dryers and other infrastructures that are exposed to
landslide. These barangays are the following; Amaga, An-an, Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan,
Hubasan, Navalita, Plaridel and Sagbok. And from the anecdotal accounts and data
gathered, the likelihood of occurrence of landslide in the locality has an average score of
3.87.
Exposure

Based on the recently conducted assessment, there are only five (5) or equivalent to
11.11% critical point facilities that are exposed to HIGH landslide, twenty-nine (29) or
64.44% critical point facilities with MODERATE landslide susceptibility and eleven (11) or
24.44% critical point facilities that has LOW landslide susceptibility. Most of the affected
are government facilities such as barangay halls; health and day care centers and school
buildings.
Sensitivity
Most of the affected critical point facilities are in GOOD condition which is about 97.78%,
while only 2.22% of the total affected critical point facilities that are in EXCELLENT
condition. However, there are no affected critical point facilities which has FAIR nor in
POOR condition. The excellent and in good condition facilities were built in the year early
2000s onwards and made up of strong and reliable materials. However, all of these
critically affected facilities were constructed without employing resilient building designs.
The rounded up average sensitivity score of critical point facilities to storm surge is 2.09
out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
It was estimated that 14.89% of the total critical point structures do not have access or
with no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as landslide
hazard is concerned. Considering, that most of the critical point facilities are
owned/administered by local government units (barangay/municipal) and/or national
government agencies, the capacity and willingness to retrofit is at category B, which
means that the owner/ concerned administrator has the capacity and willingness to
retrofit/ relocate, but in the meantime has no plan yet, because it’s in the process of
acquiring suitable lots and locations. On the area of insurance coverage, the score is
quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of the critically affected structures and facilities have
no insurance coverage. While on the area of government investments, the score is 2 out
of 4, for the LGU has moderate and minimal investments on CCA/ DRR which can also
relocation. Government regulations on hazard mitigation zoning and structural design
standards is at category B, for the local government has already implemented existing
policies and structural designs on hazard mitigation.

Vulnerability Score
Considering the data on critical point facilities and structures of all barangays affected
with landslide the average hazard exposure score of 2.47 and vulnerability score of 0.52.
The average severity of consequence score of critical point facilities exposed to landslide
is 1.76 out of 4. Most of the critical points facilities have the highest severity consequence
score of 2 which is equivalent to moderate.
Risk Score
exposed to storm surge is 7.0 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that
such facilities are moderately at risk to the adverse effects landslide. Most of these
structures and facilities are located in barangays Amaga, An-an, Cabulisan, Hubasan,
Navalita and Plaridel.
CRITICAL POINT FACILITIES AT RISK TO LANDSLIDE

Amaga Six (6) barangays with Damaged facilities -Relocation of at-risk

An-an Critical Point Facilities eventually hamper the critical facilities;
Cabulisan at risk to MODERATE delivery of basic social
Hubasan Landslide and health services -Enhancement/ retrofitting
Navalita during calamities; of affected critical point
Plaridel facilities;
Critical point facilities
unsafe to be used as -Establishment/
evacuation and Construction of landslide
temporary shelter. resilient projects/ facilities;
-Strengthening foundation
cores based on landslide-
resilient structural designs
through remodeling/
rehabilitation of school
buildings, day care and
health centers, barangay
halls and other facilities in
affected barangays
CRITICAL POINTS FACILITIES EXPOSED TO STORM SURGE

Hazard
Based on the storm surge hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there nine (9) barangays that contained critical points
and chapels; watchtowers; solar dryers and other infrastructure that are exposed to storm

surge. Based from anecdotal accounts and data, the likelihood of occurrence of storm
surge in the locality has an average score of 4.64 out of 5.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, eighty-one (81) or 81% critical point
facilities that are exposed to HIGH storm surge, seven (7) or 7% critical point facilities
with MODERATE storm surge susceptibility and twelve (12) or 12% critical point facilities
that has LOW storm surge susceptibility. Most of these affected facilities are barangay
halls; health and day care centers and school buildings in multi-grade and elementary.
Government owned infrastructures such as municipal buildings, PNP and BFP municipal
stations, public markets, public transport terminal and the municipal gym are highly
exposed to storm surge.
Sensitivity
Most of the affected critical point facilities are in GOOD condition which is about 81%,
while there are 8% of the total affected critical point facilities that are in EXCELLENT
condition. However, there are about 6% of the affected critical point facilities which has
FAIR condition and 5% of the affected critical point facilities are in POOR condition. Most
of the poorly constructed critical point facilities were built in the late 1980s and 1990s and
there were also made up of light materials such as the makeshift school buildings in Cat-
iwing Multi-grade Elementary School. The excellent and in good condition facilities were
built in the year 2000s onwards and made up of strong and reliable materials. However,
there were only 16% of the total facilities which applied resilient building designs and the
rest were constructed without employing resilient building designs. The rounded up
average sensitivity score of critical point facilities to storm surge is 2.42 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
It was estimated that 53.51% of the total critical point structures do not have access or
with no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures. Considering, that
most of the critical point facilities are owned/administered by local government units
(barangay/municipal) and/or national government agencies, the capacity and willingness
to retrofit is at category B, which means that the owner/ concerned administrator has the
capacity and willingness to retrofit/ relocate, but in the meantime has no plan yet, because
it’s in the process of acquiring suitable lots and locations. On the area of insurance
coverage, the score is quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of the critically affected
structures has no insurance coverage. While on the area of government investments, the

score is 2 out of 4, for the LGU has moderate investments on CCA/ DRR which can also
policies and structural designs on hazard mitigation.
Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on critical point facilities and structures of all barangays
affected with storm surge we come up with the average hazard exposure score of 3.47
and vulnerability score of 1.0.
The average severity of consequence score of critical point facilities exposed to storm
surge is 2.13 out of 4. Most number of critical points facilities that has the highest severity
of consequence score of 3 are found in Barangay Lungsodaan, District II and Ambao,
these are school buildings and local government owned infrastructures.
Risk Score
exposed to storm surge is 10.18 which is interpreted as HIGH, this indicates that such
facilities are highly at risk to the adverse effects of storm surge. Most of these structures
and facilities are located in barangays Lungsodaan, District II and Ambao.
CRITICAL POINT FACILITIES AT RISK TO STORM SURGE

Ambao Seven (7) barangays Damage to properties, -Relocation of at-risk

Baculod with Critical Point disruption in the delivery critical facilities;
Cat-iwing Facilities at risk to of basic social services
District I HIGH Storm Surge during calamities in the -Construction of wave/
District II barangays affected. surge protection structures
District III such as baywalk, seawall,
Lungsodaan wave breaker;
-Reinforced planting of
mangroves, beach trees
such as “Talisay” species
to serve as natural buffers;
-Establishment of
waterfront/ beachfront
promenade
CRITICAL POINTS FACILITIES EXPOSED TO LIQUEFACTION

Hazard
(MGB), it was found out that there are ten (10) barangays that contained critical points
and chapels; watchtowers; solar dryers and other infrastructure that are exposed to
liquefaction. Based from anecdotal accounts and data, the likelihood of occurrence of
liquefaction in these areas has an average score of 4.87 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, there are ninety (90) or equivalent to 87%
critical point facilities that are exposed to HIGH liquefaction, thirteen (13) or 13% critical
point facilities with MODERATE liquefaction susceptibility and none recorded with LOW
susceptibility. Most of the affected structures are government facilities such as barangay
halls; health and day care centers and school buildings.
Sensitivity
Most of the affected critical point facilities are in GOOD condition which is about 84%,
while only 8% of the total affected critical point facilities that are in EXCELLENT condition.
However, 7% of the total affected critical point facilities has FAIR condition and 1% in
POOR condition. The excellent and in good condition facilities were built in the year early
2000s onwards and made up of strong and reliable materials. However, all of these
critically affected facilities were constructed without employing resilient building designs.
The rounded up average sensitivity score of critical point facilities to liquefaction is 2.46
out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
It was estimated that 56% of the total critical point structures do not have access or with
no area coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as liquefaction
hazard is concerned. Considering, that most of the critical point facilities are
owned/administered by local government units (barangay/municipal) and/or national
government agencies, the capacity and willingness to retrofit is at category B, which
means that the owner/ concerned administrator has the capacity and willingness to
retrofit/ relocate, but in the meantime has no plan yet, because it’s in the process of
acquiring suitable lots and locations. On the area of insurance coverage, the score is

quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of the critically affected structures and facilities have
no insurance coverage. While on the area of government investments, the score is 2 out
of 4, for the LGU has moderate and minimal investments on CCA/ DRR which can also
policies and structural designs on hazard mitigation. The average adaptive capacity score
is 2.00 out of 4.00
Vulnerability Score
Considering the data on critical point facilities and structures of all barangays affected
with liquefaction the average hazard exposure score of 3.83 and vulnerability score of
0.61.
The average severity of consequence score of critical point facilities exposed to
liquefaction is somewhat high at 2.40 out of 4. The percentage of critical points facilities
that have the highest severity consequence score of 3 is about 60% and the remaining
40% of the critical points facilities has the severity of consequence score of 2.
Risk Score
exposed to liquefaction quite high at 11.74 which is interpreted as HIGH, this indicates
that such facilities are highly at risk to the adverse effects liquefaction. Most of these
structures and facilities are located in barangays Ambao, Baculod, District I, District II,
District III and Lungsodaan.
CRITICAL POINT FACILITIES AT RISK TO LIQUEFACTION

Ambao Seven (7) barangays Structural integrity of -Adoption of standard

Baculod with Critical Point critical facilities is resilient building designs
Bugho Facilities at risk to compromised and higher that lessen the impact of
District I HIGH Liquefaction probability of disruption liquefaction;
District II of basic social services -Enforcement of existing
District III during calamities. policies and guidelines,
Lungsodaan especially in the issuance
of building permits;
-Retrofit/ Relocate existing
critical point facilities;

LIFELINE UTILITIES EXPOSED TO FLOODING

Hazard
Based on the flooding hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience Bureau (MGB),
it was found out that there are sixteen (16) barangays that contained lifeline utilities such
as national, provincial, municipal, barangay and farm to market roads and bridges that
are exposed to flooding. Based from anecdotal accounts and data, the likelihood of
occurrence of liquefaction in these areas has an average score of 4.26 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, there are fifty-four (54) or equivalent to
31% lifeline utilities that are exposed to LOW flooding, forty-five (45) or 26% lifeline utilities
with MODERATE flooding susceptibility, fifty-three (53) or 30% of lifeline utilities with
HIGH susceptibility to flooding and twenty-three (23) or 13% of the lifeline facilities are
exposed to VERY HIGH flooding susceptibility. The average exposure score of lifeline
utilities exposed to flooding is at 2.30 out of 4.
Sensitivity
Most of the affected lifeline utilities are in GOOD condition which is about 87.43%, while
12.57% of the total affected lifeline utilities are in EXCELLENT condition. These roads
are passable and serviceable. The excellent and in good condition lifeline utilities such as
the provincial, municipal and farm to market roads were built in the recent years and
constructed according to standards. However, only the recently built lifeline utilities were
constructed employing resilient and hazard mitigating designs. The rounded up average
sensitivity score of lifeline utilities exposed to flooding is 2.26 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
In measuring the adaptive capacity, there are five (5) areas that must be considered

It was estimated that 20% of the lifeline utilities do not have access or with no area
coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as flooding is concerned.
Considering, that most of the lifeline utilities are owned/administered by local government
units (provincial/municipal/barangay) and/or national government agencies, the capacity
and willingness to retrofit is at category B, which means that the owner/ concerned
administrator has the capacity and willingness to retrofit/ relocate, but in the meantime
has no plan yet, because the existing roads are still serviceable and in good condition.
On the area of insurance coverage, the score is quite low at 1 out of 4 because most of
these lifeline utilities have no insurance coverage. While on the area of government
and high dependency to internal revenue allotment (IRA). Government regulations on
hazard mitigation zoning and structural design standards is at category B, for the local
mitigation. The average adaptive capacity score is 2.00 out of 4.00
Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on the lifeline utilities in the municipality affected with
flooding, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 1.83 and vulnerability
the enhancement of said lifeline utilities.
The average severity of consequence score of lifeline utilities exposed to flooding is 1.39
out of 4. The percentage of lifeline utilities that have the highest severity consequence
score of 3 is about 6.86% and the remaining 93% of the lifeline utilities has the severity
of consequence score of 1 or 2.
Risk Score
Based on the results of the assessment, the average risk score of lifeline utilities exposed
to flooding is 6.14 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that such utilities
are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects flooding. However, there are some
lifeline utilities that have high risk scores ranging from 15.0 to 18.0 which means that
these utilities are HIGHLY at risk to the adverse effects of flooding. The aforesaid lifeline
utilities are located in barangays An-an, District I, District III and Sabang.
LIFELINE UTILITIES AT RISK TO FLOODING

An-an Five (5) barangays Accessibility to and from -Elevate roads affected
District I with Lifeline Utilities at the affected locality will with flooding and employ
District III risk to HIGH Flooding be hindered during and resilient designs in the

Hubasan after the calamity, rescue rehabilitation of such

Sabang operations and delivery roads;
of emergency and relief -Construction of municipal
goods and services is stormwater system on the
hampered and/or exposed flood zone areas
delayed and its management, an
important factor to flood
prevention;
-Construction of standard
roads with resilient design;
-Implementation of green
infrastructure projects in
the municipality;
-Conduct assessment/
studies for alternative
routes that have low risk to
potential disaster impacts,
as well as provide funds
for future possible re-
routing;
-Construction of diversion
roads;
-Construction of floodways
(i.e. man-made channels
to divert floodwater)
LIFELINE UTILITIES EXPOSED TO LANDSLIDE

Hazard
Based on the landslide hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are thirteen (13) barangays that contained lifeline
utilities such as national, provincial, municipal, barangay and farm to market roads and
bridges that are exposed to landslide. Based from anecdotal accounts and data, the
likelihood of occurrence of liquefaction in these areas has an average score of 4.03 out
of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, there are seventeen (17) or equivalent to
17.53% lifeline utilities that are exposed to LOW landslide, sixty (60) or 61.86% lifeline
utilities with MODERATE landslide susceptibility, twenty (20) or 20.62% of lifeline utilities
with HIGH susceptibility to landslide and no lifeline utilities are exposed to VERY HIGH
landslide susceptibility. The average exposure score of lifeline utilities exposed to
landslide is at 2.88 out of 4.
Sensitivity
sensitivity score of lifeline utilities exposed to landslide is 2.44 out of 4.

Adaptive Capacity
coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as landslide is concerned.
Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on the lifeline utilities in the municipality exposed to landslide,
0.61. It might not be alarming but it has to be given attention and priorities as to the
enhancement of said lifeline utilities.
The average severity of consequence score of lifeline utilities exposed to landslide is 1.73
out of 4. The percentage of lifeline utilities that have the highest severity consequence
score of 3 is about 14.4% and the remaining 85.6% of the lifeline utilities has the severity
of consequence score of 1 or 2.
Risk Score
to landslide is 7.28 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that such affected
lifelines utilities are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects landslide. However,
there are some lifeline utilities that have high risk score of 15.0 which means that these
lifeline utilities are HIGHLY at risk to the adverse effects of landslide. The aforesaid lifeline
utilities are located in barangays Amaga, Bugho, Cabulisan, Cat-iwing, and Hubasan.

LIFELINE UTILITIES AT RISK TO LANDSLIDE

Amaga Five (5) barangays Accessibility of road -Construction of retaining

Bugho with Lifeline Utilities at networks is walls and slope protection
Cabulisan risk to HIGH Landslide compromised creating to landslide prone
Cat-iwing inconvenience in rescue operational roads;
Hubasan operations and delivery -Implementation of
of emergency and relief standard and breakthrough
goods and services designs in the construction
of roads on very high-risk
areas to landslide;
-Establishment/ installation
of demarcation and
warning signages on
landslide critical areas;
-Establish new and safe
routes and construct
diversion roads and
alternative routes;
-New construction of roads
should not fail on cut
slopes causing human
induced landslides, thus,
as possible any existing
bearing trees protecting
soil stability should be
given utmost protective
consideration at least to
prevent landslides on road
profiling alignment
designs;
LIFELINE UTILITIES EXPOSED TO STORM SURGE

Hazard
Based on the storm surge hazard maps acquired from Mines and Geoscience Bureau
(MGB), it was found out that there are twelve (12) barangays that contained lifeline utilities
such as national, provincial, municipal, barangay and farm to market roads and bridges
that are exposed to storm surge. Based from anecdotal accounts and data, the likelihood
of occurrence of liquefaction in these areas has an average score of 4.39 out of 6.

Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, there are twenty-four (24) or equivalent to
22.2% lifeline utilities that are exposed to LOW storm surge, eighteen (18) or 66.7%
lifeline utilities with MODERATE storm surge susceptibility, sixty-six (66) or 61.1% of
lifeline utilities with HIGH susceptibility to storm surge and there is no lifeline facilities
which are exposed to VERY HIGH storm surge susceptibility. The average exposure
score of lifeline utilities exposed to storm surge is at 2.46 out of 4.
Sensitivity
the provincial, municipal and farm to market roads were built or rehabilitated in the recent
years and constructed according to standards. However, only the recently built lifeline
utilities were constructed employing resilient and hazard mitigating designs. The rounded
up average sensitivity score of lifeline utilities exposed to storm surge is 2.02 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
government investments, and government regulations on hazard mitigation zoning and
structural design standards.
coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as storm surge is concerned.
mitigation. The average adaptive capacity score is 2.00 out of 4.00.
Vulnerability Score

Taking into account the data on the lifeline utilities in the municipality affected with storm
surge, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 2.70 and vulnerability
score of 0.50, this can be attributed that most the local access roads and bridges are
located along the coastal area. This must be given attention and alternative routes and
circumferential access roads should be taken into considerations and priorities as far as
planning is concerned.
The average severity of consequence score of lifeline utilities exposed to storm surge is
1.65 out of 4. The percentage of lifeline utilities that have the highest severity
consequence score of 3 is about 10% and the remaining 90% of the lifeline utilities has
the severity of consequence score of 1 or 2.
Risk Score
to storm surge is 7.56 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that such lifeline
utilities are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects storm surge. However, there are
some lifeline utilities that have high risk scores of 15.0 which means that these utilities
are HIGHLY at risk to the adverse effects of storm surge. These lifeline utilities are located
in barangays Ambao, Baculod, District I, District II, District III, Lungsodaan and Sabang.
LIFELINE UTILITIES AT RISK TO STORM SURGE

Ambao Seven (7) barangays Locally affected areas -Implementation of

Baculod with Lifeline Utilities at are inaccessible during alternative routes;
District I risk to HIGH Storm the onset of calamities, -Construction of Diversion
District II Surge delay in rescue Roads in storm surge safe
District III operations and in the areas/ zones;
Lungsodaan delivery of emergency -Construction of seawalls/
Sabang and survival goods and baywalk/ wave breakers
services will highly occur. along coastal roads and
highways;
-Retrofitting/
Reengineering of existing
roads to become storm
surge resilient;
-Intensified efforts in the
establishment of natural
coastal barriers such as
beach forests and
mangroves.
-Establishment of
waterfront/ beach front
promenade.
LIFELINE UTILITIES EXPOSED TO LIQUEFACTION

Hazard

(MGB), it was found out that there are eleven (11) barangays that contained lifeline utilities
such as national, provincial, municipal, barangay and farm to market roads and bridges
that are exposed to liquefaction. Based from anecdotal accounts and data, the likelihood
of occurrence of liquefaction in these areas has an average score of 4.95 out of 6.
Exposure
Based on the recently conducted assessment, there are only five (5) or 5.43% lifeline
utilities with MODERATE liquefaction susceptibility, eighty-seven (87) or 94.57% of lifeline
utilities with HIGH susceptibility to liquefaction and there is no recorded lifeline utilities
that are exposed to either LOW or VERY HIGH liquefaction susceptibility. The average
exposure score of lifeline utilities exposed to liquefaction is at 3.01 out of 4.
Sensitivity
sensitivity score of lifeline utilities exposed to liquefaction is 2.20 out of 4.
Adaptive Capacity
coverage to infrastructure related mitigation measures as far as liquefaction is concerned.

Vulnerability Score
Taking into account the data on the lifeline utilities in the municipality affected with
liquefaction, the assessment on the average hazard exposure score is 3.65 and
vulnerability score of 0.55. The result is quite high and it has to be given attention and
priorities as to the enhancement of said lifeline utilities.
The average severity of consequence score of lifeline utilities exposed to liquefaction is
2.07 out of 4. The percentage of lifeline utilities that have the highest severity
consequence score of 3 is about 27.17% and the remaining 72.83% of the lifeline utilities
has the severity of consequence score of 1 or 2.
Risk Score
to liquefaction is 10.23 which is interpreted as MODERATE, this indicates that such
utilities are MODERATELY at risk to the adverse effects of liquefaction. However, there
are some lifeline utilities that have high risk score of 15.0 which means that these utilities
are HIGHLY at risk to the adverse effects of liquefaction. The aforesaid lifeline utilities are
located in barangays Ambao, An-an, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, District I, District II,
District III, Lungsodaan, Navalita, and Sabang.
LIFELINE UTILITIES AT RISK TO LIQUEFACTION

Ambao Eleven (11) barangays Accessibility in going to -Adherence to standard

An-an with Lifeline Utilities at these affected barangays building designs in
Baculod risk to HIGH will be hindered during constructing local access
Biasong Liquefaction and after the calamity, roads/ bridges;
Bugho rescue operations and -Retrofitting/ Reinforcing of
District I delivery of emergency existing roads to become
District II and relief goods and liquefaction resilient;
District III services can be delayed/
Lungsodaan hampered.
Navalita
Sabang

PROBLEM – SOLUTION FINDING MATRIX
SOCIAL SECTOR
Sub-sector: EDUCATION
OBSERVED CONDITION IMPLICATIONS (EFFECTS) POLICY OPTIONS
Dilapidated and sub-standard Classrooms are not conducive Retrofitting of dilapidated

classrooms and/or school for learning, poor quality of classrooms and/or school
buildings education buildings
Insufficient classrooms for Congested classrooms and/or Construction of standard and

secondary level specifically classes disaster resilient classrooms
for senior high schools and/or school buildings
Some elementary school Students and school buildings Installation of hazard warning
buildings are located in are exposed to hazards and safety signages;
hazard prone areas
Lack of school facilities to Poor quality of education Construction of school

support learning in elementary facilities
and secondary schools
Provision of books and other
reading materials
Absence of science laboratory Students denied the Construction of Science
at the secondary and opportunity to conduct proper laboratories building complete
elementary schools experiments necessary for with equipment in the
learning experience; different schools
Technical skills on students
not develop.
Poor comfort rooms in some Poor sanitation; elementary Rehabilitation of comfort
elementary schools pupils prone to diseases rooms;
Construction of additional
comfort rooms

Sub-sector: HEALTH AND NUTRITION
OBSERVED CONDITION IMPLICATIONS POLICY OPTIONS

(EFFECTS)
Presence of malnourished children • Poor health • Conduct of

condition Supplement
• Slow learner or Feeding Program
may result to drop • Conduct of
out in school Mother’s Class
• Additional cost for • Intensify health
health care & education
medication especially the
• Prone to infection importance of
and mortality prenatal,
postnatal care,
breastfeeding,
PABASA
/mothers’ class
• Implementation
of EO 51
• Designation of
MNAO
• Intensification of
immunization
program
• Promotion of
nutrition-specific
and nutrition-
sensitive
programs
Lack of RHU facilities and equipment • Limited health • Construction of
services a 4-in-1 RHU
with facilities
and equipment
Increasing prevalence of non- • Poor health • Implementation
communicable diseases (NCD) condition of the of programs for
people communicable
• Increased and non-
morbidity rate communicable
diseases
• Provision of
adequate funding
from the
barangay level to
the LGU level for
a continuous
supply of
maintenance
medications.
• Implementation
of Smoking

Cessation
Program
• Activation of the
NCD Club
• Establishment of
HPN/ DM Clinic
• Advocacy
campaign for a
healthy lifestyle
for the LGU
personnel, senior
citizens and NCD
clients
Increasing tuberculosis cases • Increase of TB • Creation of TB
mortality and DOTS clinic &
morbidity kiosk
• Incentivization of
BHWs for the
conduct of “Tutok
Gamutan”
• Quarterly
conduct of TB
caravan
Lack of adolescent-focused care • Increase of • Establishment of
sexually- AHDP clinic
transmitted • Regular conduct
disease, of STI &
HIV/AIDS, HIV/AIDS
teenage awareness
pregnancy, programs
mental health • Tapping of other
problems, and stakeholders
risky behavior (religious groups,
SK, women’s
groups, NGOs,
etc.) for
advocacy
programs
• Enforcement of
sex education
towards
adolescents
• Promotion of
youth-centered
activities/
programs
Increased cases of animal bites • Occurrence of • Implementation
rabies mortality of responsible
pet ownership
• Construction of
dog pound

Sub-sector: SOCIAL WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT

(EFFECTS)
Increase of psycho-social Increase of crimes and -Intensify outreach programs

related problems in disaster violence -Implementation of
affected areas Sustainable Livelihood
programs
Absence of senior citizen Unmet senior citizen’s need Establishment of Senior
care center for socialization and active Citizen Center
community involvement
Presence of CAR/ CICL and Risk to violence and crimes -Establishment of temporary
VAWC cases shelter
-Strengthen the functionality
of LCPC, VAWC, LCAT
-Conduct advocacy campaign
on RA 9344, 9262,7610 and
9208
-Establishment of referral
system
-Conduct of intervention/
diversion program, family life
education and counselling
Incidence of malnutrition 3 to Poor school performance and -Conduct Supplemental
4 years old pre-schoolers learning skills, high risk to Feeding Program
illnesses -Conduct Nutrition education
program
-Establishment of Backyard
Gardening program
Poor ECCD structure and Unsafe and not conducive for -Rehabilitation/ retrofitting of
amenities learning damaged ECCD buildings
-Construction of standard and
disaster resilient ECCD
buildings
Severely affected means of -Loss of income -Implement skills training
livelihood -Limited opportunity to meet program
basic needs -Establish Livelihood
Development Assistance
(LAG) and TUPAD program
Disaster stricken families and -Loss of properties -Facilitate disaster relief,
individuals -Displaced families and recovery and rehabilitation
individuals programs
Absence of PDAO -Unmet PWD needs for -Establishment of PDAO

socialization center
-Institutionalization of PDAO
Increasing number of solo/ -Imbalance family setup -Intensify advocacy campaign
single parents -Less parental guidance on solo parent’s welfare act,
child protection law
-Implement Educational
Assistance, Special Program

for Employment of Students

(SPES) and Government
Internship Program (GIP)
No designated room for social -deprive client’s right to -Expansion of MSWD office
welfare counselling and privacy and confidentiality of allocating room for
interview information affecting in the counselling and interview
case management process
Sub-sector: SETTLEMENT AND SHELTER
Absence of socialized housing Displaced families and/or Establishment of socialized

project in the locality households with no permanent housing project
dwelling units
Unavailability of suitable lot for Hamper/ cause delay on Procurement of lot for
socialized housing project and project implementation socialized housing and
relocation site relocation site
There are settlements/ Increasing number of Establishment of relocation

Residential areas identified to displaced families and/or site.
be vulnerable to different households; Construction of access roads
hazards and sea level rise and utilities in proposed
relocation site.

Sub-sector: PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY

(EFFECTS)
Lack of firemen and Spread of fire is not easily -Recruitment and training of
firefighting equipment contained fire volunteer brigades
-Procurement of firefighting
equipment i.e. portable fire
pump
-Procurement of Rescue
Vehicle (Ambulance)
Insufficient investigative tools Police investigators could not Procurement of investigative
and equipment easily identify criminal tools and equipment
offenders especially serious
crimes
Lack of legal assistance Low moral to PNP personnel, Allocation for legal assistance
restraining them to perform on
serious/ controversial cases
to prevent personal/ political
harassment
Rising incidence of crimes Deterioration of peace and Increase police visibility and
order in the locality apprehension activities within
AOR
Hostile attacks from PNP and BFP municipal -Procurement of installation of
government enemies and stations are vulnerable to security devices and
terrorist groups communist/ terrorist group equipment i.e. CCTV, aerial
atrocity drone
-Completion of PNP perimeter
fence
-Construction of PNP garage
-Construction of perimeter
fence at BFP building
-Completion of BFP station
building
Presence of illegal drug Increasing crime incidence, Intensify anti-illegal drug
activities mental and moral degradation campaign and operations
No detention home for minor Minor offenders were Establishment of Detention
offenders considered/ treated as regular home for minor (Bahay
criminals Kalinga/ Bahay Pag-asa)
Absence of operational patrol Rampant violation of fishery Procurement of motorized
boat laws within marine protected patrol boats
areas
No Municipal Jail Inadequate/ improper facility Establishment of standard
(only lock-up cell which to detain offenders municipal jail
serves as the detention cell)

Sub-sector: SPORTS, RECREATION, ARTS AND CULTURE
Absence of basketball courts High risk for children and Construction of basketball
in barangays District I sports enthusiast playing at court and sports facility in
the roads safe zone
Most of the basketball courts Constituents are deprived to Rehabilitation/ retrofitting of

are not safe for sports indulge in sports and critically conditioned
activities because of its poor recreational activities basketball courts
and critical conditions
Location of sports facilities in Provide high risk to the lives Construction of sports
danger zone such as in of the people facilities in safe zone
District III which is located
at the street

ECONOMIC SECTOR
Sub-sector: AGRICULTURE
OBSERVED IMPLICATIONS POLICY OPTIONS

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
High cost of farm inputs • Low income • Subsidy on farm inputs

among farmers (fertilizer, high breed rice
seeds)
• Educate farmers on
Low crop production • High-priced local high value and cash
farm produce, low crop varieties
income among • Adopt high yielding
farmers and high valued crop
variety and organic
farming
• Encourage
vegetable farming
and inter-
cropping
High poverty incidence • Hunger • Provision of
• Dependency Livelihood
in opportunities
government • Conduct Skills Training
• Increased
poverty
incidence
Low Agricultural Productivity • Increased poverty • Adoption of Modern
Agricultural
Technology
• Construction of FMR
Brontispa infestation among • Decrease • Conduct of
coconut trees in the locality d information drives
productio • Tie- up with national
n agencies such as PCA
• Reduced for the treatment of
family income infected
• Increased poverty coconut farms
Low price of copra • Low income • Introduce value add-
among farmers ons on coconut
• Increased products (i.e. coconut
poverty husk, coconut
incidence shell, juice)
• Low farm yields • Provide financial
Majority of farmers do • Financial instability and technical
not adopt diversified • High – priced assistance to
farming practices farm produce farmers
• Tap national agencies
(i.e. DOST, DA, DOLE)
in facilitating training
programs for
agriculture
products processing

Deficiency in post-harvest • Poor quality of • Allocate funds for the

facilities (i.e. MPDP, rice rice produced acquisition of post-
threshers, mechanical due to delayed harvest facilities
dryers) drying
• Low – priced
palay/ rice
products

Sub-sector: TOURISM DEVELOPMENT

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Resource generation/ look for

Underdeveloped tourism Less tourism generated external funding
attractions revenues
Less tourist arrival Appropriate budget for tourism
development
Improve/ retrofit existing

structures
Absence of Investment Lack investors Review and Revision of

Incentive Code Investment Incentive Code
Existing Hotel and Lodging Unsatisfied tourists Establish home stay program
Houses are not Tourist friendly
Inadequate/ unstable Less investors Tourism Access development

communication facilities project
particularly telephone fixed (Communication, transportation
line & wifi connection etc.)
Brochures/pamphlets preparation
Absence of municipal website Weak tourism industry
promotion Multi-media Tourism Promotion
Project

Sub-sector: COMMERCE AND TRADE

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Deteriorating condition of the Less revenue collected Construction of new commercial

old public market from the stalls center/public market
Proper solid waste Negative impact to Implement a municipal-wide

management is not fully tourism, health and effective and efficient solid
implemented environment waste management/ garbage
collection system
Inadequate data for Inaccessible information to Establish a monitoring tool and

commercial activities and potential investors and database for economic activities
employment researchers
Inadequate parking space Commercial area is prone Implement traffic scheme in

and congested traffic in to accidents commercial areas and
commercial areas implement open parking space
for every commercial building
constructed
Outdated Local Revenue and less investors are attracted Revised Local Revenue Code
Municipal Investment to put investments in the and craft a viable Municipal
Incentive Code locality Investment Incentive Code
Inadequate communication Attract less investors Linkage with communications

facilities and unstable and businessmen and internet providers to
internet connections promote strong
communication facilities in
the locality

INFRASTRUCTURE SECTOR
Sub-sector: ECONOMIC SUPPORT: FARM TO MARKET ROADS

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Poor road condition/ Less productivity Construction/ Concreting /

Unpaved local access roads Inconvenience of motorists Rehabilitation/ Upgrading of
core local access roads, farm-
to-market roads and pathways
Absence of access to the Inaccessibility Construction of new access road

proposed expansion area network
Traffic congestion in Poor traffic circulation Improve the condition of the

downtown/ commercial area existing road
No proper docking area for

sea going vessels serving Inconvenience of Rehabilitation of municipal wharf
passengers from Dinagat commuting public
Islands

Sub-sector: ECONOMIC SUPPORT: IRRIGATION SYSTEM

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Poor conditions of irrigation -Cannot maximize crop Rehabilitation/ retrofitting of

systems production irrigation system facilities
-low yield
Insufficient irrigation system Cannot maximize Construction of irrigation system

facilities in rainfed rice production facilities
production areas

Sub-sector: SOCIAL SUPPORT: EVACUATION CENTER

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Insufficient standard Inadequate facilities to Construction of standard and

evacuation centers and accommodate evacuees disaster risk resilient evacuation
facilities during calamities centers and facilities

Sub-sector: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT:

GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Lack office space in Cramped offices and not Procurement of lot for the
government buildings client friendly expansion of government
buildings
Expansion of municipal multi-

purpose buildings
Damaged old municipal Unsafe for government Rehabilitation/ retrofitting of old
building operations municipal building

Sub-sector: UTILITIES: WATERWORKS AND SEWERAGE SYSTEM

(EFFECTS)
High cost of electric power Deprived access to modern Installation of renewable energy
supply company conveniences as source of electricity i.e. solar
street lights
Negotiate SOLECO/Dept. of
Lack of power supply in far Low socio-economic Energy for inclusion in the
flung sitios and barangays activities Energization Project;
adapt other sources of electricity
Insufficient water supply in Unmeet water needs of the -Establishment of water

Barangay An-an due to high constituents impounding facility
elevation -Procurement and installation of
solar/ mechanical water pumps
Unsecured water source area Exposure to contamination Perimeter fencing of water

due to human misbehavior source and reservoir at
Matunog and Hubasan Spring
Unserved households with Insufficient water supply -Expansion of Hinundayan

water utilities for household consumption Potable Water System (HPWS)
-Installation of pipelines in
remote areas
Damaged water intake tank Unsafe structure Rehabilitation/ Repair of water

at Matunog Spring intake tank at Matunog Spring
Clogged drainage ways Flooding Construction/ Upgrading of

Water borne diseases Poor drainage system
road condition

ENVIRONMENTAL SECTOR
Sub-sector: FOREST ECOSYSTEM

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
1. Forest land are • Plant indigenous species

predominantly planted • Decreasing along forest line boundary
with coconuts number of trees, • IEC re: importance of
causing landslide protecting, and preserving
our forest land
2. Some portion of forest • Environmental
land prone to landslide degradation • Plant more trees
• Decreasing
supply of water • Implement existing laws
3. Trees are diminishing
due to “kaingin” and and policies
cutting of fire woods
4. Decreasing due to
illegal cutting of
immature trees

Sub-sector: WATER AND AIR QUALITY

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Water quality is still fresh and Abundant potable water -Sustainable water resource
potable supply conservation initiatives
such as tree growing
-Protection of sub watersheds
Presence of air pollutants -Unclean and unhealthy Increase vegetation cover and
due to emissions from air quality trees to absorb air pollutants
transport vehicles -Increase respiratory
diseases

Sub-sector: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Household Waste Mixed Waste are still -Strict enforcement of waste

Segregation is not fully collected in the segregation at source
enforced mainstream. -Procurement of garbage trucks
Improper disposal of solid -Residual wastes that end -Penalized violators caught in
waste on street canals, up in the sea causes the act disposing waste
creeks, river banks and on damage to marine habitats improperly.
coastlines that decreases production -Functional MRFs in every
and development of barangay
marine resources. -Operationalization of municipal
MRF and RCA
Increasing volume of plastic -Clogging of street canals -Procurement and installation of
waste and esteros that is the eco-friendly high thermal
main cause of flooding decomposition machine
(incinerator)

Sub-sector: DISASTER PREPAREDNESS

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Lacks early warning system Unwarned and unaware -Procurement and installation of
devices and signages constituents during EWS devices and signages
calamities -Procurement and installation of
long-range siren
Responders lack skills Cannot respond properly -Conduct skills trainings and
training during emergencies and capability building to responders
disasters

INSTITUTIONAL SECTOR
Sub-sector: ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Unfilled mandatory Plantilla -Ineffective delivery of Filling-up of mandatory Plantilla

positions basic services positions
-multi tasking of some
employees
Employees lack capacity and -mediocrity in public -Conduct of Employees’

skills service delivery capacity and skills training

Sub-sector: FISCAL MANAGEMENT

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Dependent on outside fund Limited funds to -Establishment of economic

sources primarily on National implement programs and enterprise.
Tax Allocation projects -Intensify information drive on
tax awareness
-Massive collection campaign

Sub-sector: LEGISLATIVE PERFORMANCE

CONDITION (EFFECTS)
Lacks capacity and skills on Cannot carry-out effective Capacity and skills development
local legislation and efficiently local on Local Legislation,
legislation functions Parliamentary Rules and
Procedure and Quasi-judicial

Sub-sector: LGU – CSO – PRIVATE SECTOR LINKAGES

CONDITION (EFFECTS)

CROSS – SECTORAL AND SPECIAL ISSUES AND CONCERNS
Cross Sectoral Issues Concern Sectors Implications/ Impacts
1. Climate Change across all sectors Increase in Temperature:

Impacts • Social -Heat strokes
• Economic -Malnutrition
• Environment - Deteriorating health
• Infrastructure condition of the people
• Institutional - Proliferation of airborne/
vector borne diseases;
-Decrease agricultural
productivity located in
upland area
-Pest and diseases
infestation
- Heat stress on crops,
livestock and poultry
- Low productivity of
crops and livestock due
to drought
- Low quality of
agricultural products
-Food shortage and famine
- Loss of livelihood
- Decreased income
- High incidence of forest/

bush fires
- Degrade survival of trees
and affect the biodiversity
- Water shortage
- Scarcity of water supply /
Low water sources
- Contribute to global
warming
- Deterioration of coral reef
system
- Infestation of crown of
thorns
- Reduced marine
ecosystem productivity
- Scarcity of food sources
- Sea level rise

- Inundation of
infrastructures
- Sinking built-up areas

- Buildings are thermally

inefficient
- Urban heat islands
Increase in Precipitation/
Rainfall:
-Flooding in flood prone

urban areas (residential,
commercial, institutional)
-Damage to properties
-Loss of lives
-Loss of livelihood
-Spread of water borne/
vector borne diseases
-Poor health condition of
the people
-Disruption of economic
activities
-Flooding in low-lying
production areas
-Damage to irrigation
and pre/post-harvest
facilities
-Infestation of pests and
diseases in crops,
livestock and poultry
-Damage to crops,
livestock & poultry
-Reduced productivity
due to flooding
-Low quality of agri-
products
-Occurrence of rain-
induced flooding and
landslides
-Deteriorating water
quality
-Soil erosion
-Endangered wildlife
-Increase
sedimentation/siltation
due to flooding
-Coral reef destruction
-Decrease of marine
food supply
-Damaged critical
facilities, lifeline utilities
(roads & bridges) and
other infrastructures

-CC pose a great

challenge and threat to
the local government
-lacks institutional
capacity in terms of
resources, technology
and manpower
-lacks enabling policies
and legislative measures
2. Environmental across all sectors - Impact on human health

degradation • Social resulting to mortality due
• Economic to degrading
• Environment environmental conditions
• Infrastructure - Loss of biodiversity
• Institutional - Imbalance ecosystem
- Loss for the Tourism
Industry
across all sectors Lack of access to basic

3. Poverty Alleviation • Social needs and socio-economic
thru access to basic • Economic services has its effect at
services • Environment the most basic level of
• Infrastructure living.
• Institutional -Poor access to health
services, people will
remain unhealthy; children
will die; and any epidemic
can have catastrophic
results.
-Poor access to clean
water, again health will
suffer.
-Poor access to education
(children in the future
share the limitations
confronting their parents
today)
-Lack of access to markets
will ensure that whatever
potential that exists for
marketing products will be
limited.
4. Good governance across all sectors -Good governance is a

• Social fundamental factor to
• Economic social equality and
• Environment security, economic
• Infrastructure growth, environmental
• Institutional balance, infrastructure
quality and institutional
capability.
5. Responsible across all sectors - it requires participatory

citizenship • Social and collaborative efforts
• Economic and initiatives from the

• Environment citizenry to realize

• Infrastructure mutually beneficial goals
• Institutional and attainment of the
LGU’s Vision

SECTORAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
(SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, ENVIRONMENT, INSTITUTIONAL,

INFRASTRUCTURE )
i. Introduction
ii. Expanded PSFMP
iii. Goals-Objectives-Outcomes Indicators (DRR-CCA lens)
iv. Programs, Projects, Activities (Form 2a)
v. Projects Ideas of Project Briefs (Form 3b)
vi. Legislative Requirements (Form 5b)
vii. CapDev Requirements (Form 5a)
viii. M&E Strategy (Form 6b)

SECTORAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS
This part of the chapter provides detailed and comprehensible plans of the local
government for the ensuing six years that would enable the LGU to achieve its Vision
statement.
These different development plans serve as interventions of the Local Government to
address various problems and issues arising in the municipality. These consist of the
Social, Economic, Environment, Institutional and Infrastructure sectors.
SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Introduction
This sector consolidates the different recommended activities designed to solve the
different problems in relation to improving the state of well-being of the people living in
the locality and enhancing the quality of the different social services such as education,
health, social welfare, public order and safety, sports, recreation, arts and culture. This
compendium of proposed activities is designed to deal with these issues and concerns
relative to the well-being of the constituents and upgrading the quality of social services.
Social justice and gender sensitivity are also addressed by this sectoral plan. Programs
and projects in this sector are considered as “soft” non-capital type but are equally as
important as capital investment of “hard” projects.

Sub-sector: EDUCATION
Goal: Improved quality education
Objectives: 1. To decrease number of dropouts and raise cohort survival and

completion rates to 100% by the end of the planning period
2. To increase passers of A&E
Strategy: 1. Improved classrooms conducive to learnings

2. Focus on implementation of scholarship program
3. Focus on ALS literacy program to increase A& E
passers
Programs and Projects:
1. Purchase of lot for construction of additional buildings

2. Repair of makeshift school building and makeshifts
3. Strengthening the Learning of Science with Robotics
4. Construction of additional school buildings
5. Repainting of District Office
6. Procurement and installation of air conditioning system at
District Office
7. Repair of 12 damaged classrooms in different schools of
Hinundayan District
Proposed Legislation/
Legislative Requirements:
1. Appropriation of funds through SEF

2. Budgetary allocation for scholarship program

Sub-sector: HEALTH AND NUTRITION
Goal: Promote health and well-being of constituency
Objective:
1. Improved health facilities and services
2. Fully functional Rural Health Unit
Strategy:
1. Outsourcing of funds for expansion of RHU building
2. To improve health indicators
1. Expansion of Municipal multi-purpose building (RHU)

2. Construction of standard RHU
3. Implementation of Ang TAMAng BHW
4. Implementation of “Healthy Diet, Healthy Habit for Life”
1. Enactment of Ordinance implementing Ang TAMAng BHW

program
2. Enactment of Ordinance implementing “Healthy Diet, Healthy
Habit for Life” program
3. Resolution requesting financial assistance from outside source
for expansion of municipal multi-purpose building (RHU) and
Construction of standard RHU

Sub-sector: SOCIAL WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT
Goal: Enhancement of LGU Social Welfare Services
Objective/ Strategy:
1. To enhance access to social welfare services by disadvantaged
persons
2. To provide assistance to child and youth sector
3. To provide assistance to elderly sector
4. To provide assistance to PWD
5. Strengthen women’s organization
1. Child and youth welfare program

2. Senior Citizen’s welfare program
3. Provision of AICS
4. Financial assistance to children in conflict with law
5. Financial assistance to PWD
6. Orientation/ Reorientation of DCW
7. Provision of Scholarship Program
8. Establishment of Sustainable Livelihood Programs
9. Rehabilitation/ Retrofitting of Day Care Centers
10. Construction of standard day care centers
11. Construction of senior citizen’s center
12. Expansion of MSWD office
1. Formulation of GAD Code
2. Formulation/ Revision of Children’s Code

Sub-sector: PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY
Goal: Maintenance Peace and Order
Objectives:
1. Ensure a safer place to live and do business
2. Drug-free municipality
Strategy:
1. Enhanced crime prevention thru effective policy

1. Procurement and Installation of CCTV
2. Procurement of aerial drone
3. Construction of PNP garage
4. Construction of PNP barracks
1. Appropriation of funds to support illegal drug campaigns
2. Allocation of intelligence funds

Sub-sector: SPORTS, RECREATION, ARTS AND CULTURE
Goal: Promote sports, recreation, arts and culture development
To implement meaningful sports, recreational, arts and cultural

activities for the constituency
1. Support sports competition in schools

2. Conduct cultural activities such as Miss Hinundayan
3. Enhancement of Municipal Plaza as recreational space
1. Allocation of funds for sports, recreational, arts and cultural

activities

ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Introduction
This compendium of economic related development plans embodies the municipality’s to

do list on creating a favorable ambience for investors to pour their investments in order
for the local economy to flourish and assure the populace of a stable supply of
commodities, provide job opportunities and eventually increase family income which will
lead to improvement of the people’s quality of life.

Sub-sector: AGRICULTURE
Goal: Increased Food Production

Ensure Food Security
To increase farming and fishing households’ income
1. To enhance agricultural productivity
2. To increase farm-based incomes through integrated and
diversified farming system
3. To provide technical assistance to farmers with improved crop
production technology
4. To promote organic farming for sustainable agriculture

1. Provision of High-Quality Seeds for farmers
2. Acquisition of Farm Machineries and equipment’s & Post
Harvest Facilities
3. Assist Farmers’ Cooperative/ Association (FCA) in preparation
of Accreditation of FCAs
4. Provision of Rice Farmers Fertilizer Subsidy
5. Rehabilitation of 2 irrigation dams and 20,000 linear meters
canal linings
6. Installation of 2 pipe lines for potable water at Camongaan Rice
Area
7. Installation of Canal Cover for Camongaan Rice area as road
network
8. Municipal Nursery, Demo Farm Establishment and maintenance
9. Construction of one (1) unit Warehouse
10. Conduct Orientation on Farm Clustering and Consolidation
11. Facilitate registration of farmers in Farmers and Fisherfolks
Enterprise
12. Development Information System (FFEDIS)
13. Animal Health Care & Management
14. Declaration of ASF Free Municipality
15. Construction of new modernized Single A slaughterhouse
16. Construction of Dog Shelter for Impounding Dog
17. Coastal Resource Management (CRM) Activities
18. Livelihood components for Farmers and Fisherfolks
19. Enhancement of Farmers Information Technology Service
Center

20. Support to Farmers & Fisherfolks Activities (Farmers and

Fisherfolks Field Day and Garden Show)
21. Support to Rural Based Organizations and Activities (RIC, 4H
Club and Farmers)
22. Revision of the existing MAO Organizational Structure
1. Adoption and Implementation of RA 10068 Organic
Agriculture Act of 2000
2. Appropriation for funding subsidy to farmers
3. Authorized Local Chief Executive to enter Memorandum
of Agreements (MOA), Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) with partner agricultural agencies
4. Implementation of Dog Ordinance

Sub-sector: TOURISM DEVELOPMENT
Goal: 1. Promotion of Municipal Tourism Development and Investment

2. Promotion of Socio-cultural development
1. Develop and promote tourism attraction sites
2. Develop linkage to attract inflows of investments
3. Conduct sustainable measures to preserve socio-cultural
properties

1. Concreting of access roads to tourism sites (An-an White
Beach, Sabang Pandan and Cabatuan Beach)
2. Develop linkage and partnership with investors and
stakeholders
3. Installation of directional, informative and safety signages of
tourism sites
4. Marketing of tourism sites
5. Establishment of night food market
6. Establishment of reliable transport services
7. Construction of public comfort rooms and shower rooms at
tourism sites
8. Establishment of municipal operated beach resort and LGU
tourism-related economic enterprise
9. Conduct cultural mapping
10. Conduct Handayanan Festival and other socio-cultural activities
11. Preservation of cultural heritage properties
1. Strengthening Environmental Protection Policies
2. Amendment of existing LGU Investment Code
3. Enactment of Tourism Code

Sub-sector: COMMERCE AND TRADE
Goal: Increase investment opportunities on commerce and trade
1. Development of commercial infrastructures
2. Create business-friendly environment

1. Construction of Commercial Town Center
2. Improvement of public market
3. Improvement of Public Transport Terminal
4. General Revision of Real Property Taxes
1. Updating of Local Revenue Code
2. Updating Investment Code

INFRASTRUCTURE AND PHYSICAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Introduction
This component embodies with the infrastructure building program, lot ownership and
land acquisition as right-of-way (ROW) for public facilities which involves the opening of
new roads and bridges for expansion of urban use areas.

Sub-sector: ECONOMIC SUPPORT: FARM TO MARKET ROADS
Goal: Enhance accessibility in rural and far-flung areas in the municipality
1. To improve local road networks
2. To provide access to basic social services
3. To support economic goals and objectives (i.e. FMRs)
4. Increase the length of concrete-paved farm to market roads and
access roads to tourism sites

1. Local Road Network Development Program
2. Concreting of 14.702 km Local Roads
3. Construction of Farm-to-Market Roads (FMRs) in different areas
of the municipality
1. Appropriation Ordinance to fund FMR concreting projects
2. Resolution requesting financial assistance from outside source

Sub-sector: ECONOMIC SUPPORT: IRRIGATION SYSTEM
Goal: Improve irrigation system facilities
1. To increase agricultural production
2. To ensure food security
3. To increase irrigated areas

1. Rehabilitation of irrigation system facilities with flood control
component
2. Rehabilitation of irrigation canal linings with cover
3. Construction of line canals and irrigation system facilities
1. Resolution requesting NIA to provide technical assistance in
designing irrigation system facilities
2. Enact appropriation ordinance for rehabilitation and
improvement of irrigation system facilities

-Construction of 5 Standard Evacuation Centers in Barangays Cat-iwing, Sagbok, Hubasan, Baculod an
-Rehabilitation of covered court cum evacuation center in Cabulisan; U

Sub-sector: SOCIAL SUPPORT: EVACUATION CENTER
Goal: Provide safe, secure and disaster resilient evacuation centers
1. To construct strategic additional standard evacuation centers
within the municipality
2. Increase the number of standard evacuation center by end of
planning period

1. Construction of Municipal Standard Evacuation Centers
strategically located within the municipality (Cat-iwing, Sagbok,
Ambao, Hubasan, Baculod, Bugho, An-an, Navalita)
2. Rehabilitation of covered court cum evacuation centers in
different barangays
3. Completion of multi-purpose building designated as evacuation
centers in different barangays
1. Appropriation to allocate funds for the procurement of lot
2. Resolution requesting national government and outside funding
agencies for fund allocation

Sub-sector: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT:

GOVERNMENT BUILDINGS
Goal: Improve local buildings and structures
1. To strengthen structural capacity of local buildings and
structures
2. Retrofit/ Rehabilitate/ Repair local buildings and structures

1. Retrofit/Rehabilitate/ Repair local buildings and structures
2. Rehabilitation/ Restoration of municipal buildings
3. Expansion of municipal multi-purpose buildings
4. Improvement of 1 National Child Development Center in
Lungsodaan
5. Repair of Covid19 isolation center in Biasong
6. Improvement of municipal gym cum evacuation center
7. Enhancement of municipal plaza
8. Completion of barangay auditoriums
9. Completion of barangay multi-purpose buildings
10. Construction/ installation of solar street lights in municipal
streets and barangays
11. Construction of standard RHU building
12. Construction of Single A Slaughterhouse/ municipal abattoir
13. Construction of permanent MDRRM office
14. Construction of climate resilient resettlement housing units
15. Establishment for relocation site for displaced settlements
1. Appropriation to allocate funds for the procurement of lot for
government infrastructures

Sub-sector: UTILITIES: WATERWORKS AND SEWERAGE SYSTEM
Goal: Expand LGU waterworks system

Enhance Municipal Sewerage System
1. To maximize waterworks system capacity
2. To increase income potential
3. To increase flood preventive measures in urban use areas

1. Water system Development Program
2. Rehabilitation of waterworks system facilities
3. Installation of water pipelines in remote areas
4. Construction of perimeter fence at Matunog and Hubasan
reservoir
5. Construction of additional reservoir
6. Rehabilitation of intake tank in Matunog Spring
7. Upgrading/ Rehabilitation of drainage canal/ sewerage system;
8. Construction of climate resilient drainage system
1. Appropriation to allocate funds for the procurement of lot for
government infrastructures

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
Introduction
This is a consolidation of the different environmental implications of every single

development programs and projects that the LGU has formulated which stipulate
mitigation and adaptation measures for the adverse effects of climate change. It likewise
embodies the LGU’s initiatives in maintaining air and water quality, managing solid waste,
preserving the natural resources to support economic development, safeguarding mother
nature and sustaining ecological balance for the future generations.

Sub-sector: FOREST ECOSYSTEM
Goal: Environmentally sound, climate change and disaster resilient

community
1. To enforce environmental laws
2. To conserve environment for generations to come

1. Forest Protection Program
2. Reforestation Program
3. Designate Forest Rangers and Bantay Gubat
1. Enforce anti-illegal logging ordinance

Sub-sector: WATER AND AIR QUALITY
Goal: Preserve sub-watershed areas for sustainable water resources

Sustain good ambiance air quality
1. To protect and conserve sub-watershed
2. To maintain good air quality

1. Periodic tree planting and tree growing
1. Anti-smoke belching ordinance

Sub-sector: SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
Goal: Improved waste disposal system

Promote and implement RA 9003
Reduce and manage solid waste
1. To reduce waste disposal
2. Functional Material Recovery Facility (MRF) and
Residual Containment Area (RCA)
3. To enforce solid waste implementing rules and regulation

1. Installation of electrification system with solar panel at MRF and
RCA
2. Procurement and installation of thermal decomposition machine
1. Implementation of Republic Act 9003

Sub-sector: DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
Goal: Reduction and Management of Disaster Risks
1. Provision of prevention measures and mitigating structures &
facilities, implement capacity building activities
2. provision of life preservation measures through immediate
response and rebuilding the disaster affected communities
3. To increase capacity and reduce vulnerability of constituents

1. Conduct Climate and Disaster Risk Assessment/Update CDRA
2. Construction of Climate Resilient / Flood Control Drainage
System
3. Construction of Creek and Riverbank Protection
4. Construction of Seawall and shoreline protection
5. Construction of Concrete Irrigation Canal
6. Annual Tree Growing
7. De-clogging of Canals and Creeks
8. Construction of Flood Control Drainage Canals
9. Procurement of Lots for Additional Evacuation Centers
10. Construction of Municipal Standard Evacuation Centers
11. Construction of Municipal Standard Evacuation Center with
Storage Facility
12. Continuing Construction of Concrete Irrigation Canals
13. Procurement and Installation of Machine for Eco- Friendly Ultra
High Thermal Decomposition System
14. Rehabilitation of Damaged Houses
15. Rehabilitation of Damaged Municipal Buildings
16. Rehabilitation of Damaged Municipal Facilities
17. Rehabilitation of Damaged Watch Towers
18. Rehabilitation of Damaged Municipal Streetlights
19. Rehabilitation of Damaged National Buildings
20. Rehabilitation of Damaged School Buildings
21. Rehabilitation of Damaged Barangay Halls
22. Rehabilitation of Damaged Brgy. Covered Courts
23. Rehabilitation of Damaged Barangay Day Care Center
24. Rehabilitation of Navalita Dam

Non-project:
1. DRRM Human Resource Development
2. ELDRRM Planning Workshop and CBDRRM Planning
Workshop
3. Basic Incident Command System (BICS) Training
4. Emergency Operation (EOC) Training
5. Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic Life Support (BLS) and Fire
Suppression (FS) Training for BERTS
6. Radio Communication Training
7. Emergency Medical Responders Training – Level II
8. Basic Incident Command System (BICS) Training
9. Contingency Planning
10. Disaster Data and Information Management Training
11. Camp Coordination and Center Management (CCCM) Training
12. Rapid and Damage & Needs Analysis (RDANA) Training
13. Flood and Swift Water Rescue Training
14. Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDANA) Training
15. Public Service Continuity Planning
16. Rehabilitation and Recovery Planning
17. Warehouse, Financial, Supply Chain, Inventory and Relief
Goods Management Training
18. Operation LISTO Training
19. Logistics Management Training
20. Management of the Dead and Missing Training Course
21. Search and Rescue (SAR) Training
22. Water Search and Rescue (WASAR) Training
23. High Angle Search and Rescue Operation Training
24. Mountain Search and Rescue (MOSAR) Training
Suppression (FS) Training for the Community
Suppression (FS) Training for the Vulnerable Sectors
Suppression (FS) Training for School DRRM Coordinators
Suppression (FS) Training for the Youth (SK)
29. Orientation Forum for the Regular Conduct of Community
Disaster Simulation Drills
30. Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for Sexual and
Reproductive Health Training
31. Water and Sanitation for Health (WASH) Training
32. Nutrition in Emergencies Training
33. Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) Training
34. ELDRRM Planning Workshop (2025-2028)
35. Procurement of Stockpiling

36. Procurement of Radio Tower, Base & Handheld Radios for the
Establishment of Radio Communication System
37. Procurement of Communication Equipment for OPCEN IECs
38. Procurement & Installation of Early Warning Markers, Devices &
Signages
39. Procurement & Installation of Siren
40. Procurement of Satellite Phone & VSAT
41. Procurement of DRRM Tools
42. Procurement of Two (2) Units Motorcycles
43. Procurement/ Fabrication of Two (2) Units Motorized Boats
44. Procurement of one (1) unit Drone
45. Procurement of Generator
46. Procurement of two (2) units Mass Transport Truck
47. Procurement of two (2) units Mini – Dump Truck
48. Procurement of One (1) unit Manlift Equipment
49. Procurement of One (1) Unit Crawler Type Backhoe
50. Immediate General Clearing Operations
51. Maintenance of Peace and Order
52. Search, Rescue, Retrieval and Fire Suppression
53. Health and Sanitation
54. Rapid Damage Assessment and Needs Analysis
55. Relief Operations
56. Immediate Continuity of Education
57. Post Disaster Needs Analysis
1. Appropriation ordinance to allocate funds for the procurement of

lot and equipment

INSTITUTIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Introduction
The core element of this plan is to strengthen the capability of local government
bureaucracy as well as the competence of elected officials to manage the municipality’s
development. Human resource development, fiscal management, legislative performance
are the vital components of this sectoral plan. This likewise promotes people’s
participation in the planning and implementation of PPAs as well as in the monitoring and
evaluation of different programs, projects and activities.

Sub-sector: ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT
Goal: Develop efficient and effective local governance responsive to the

needs of its people
1. To ensure that municipal officials and employees faithfully
discharge their respective duties and functions
2. To strengthen Human Resource Management
3. To improve performance of local officials and employees
4. To improve delivery of basic services

1. Executive Services Administration Program
2. Information and Communication Management Program
3. Civil Registry Services Administration Program
4. Civil Registration and Statistics Program
5. Capability Development Program
6. Support Program to Barangay
7. Monitoring and Evaluation Program
8. Establish Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS)
9. Establish PRIME HRM maturity levels
10. Implement four-core of HRM systems
11. Establish Intranet and Digitalization
1. Appropriation ordinance for funding support to organization and
management programs
2. Enact Ordinance on creation of Plantilla position

Sub-sector: FISCAL MANAGEMENT
Goal: Maintain a progressive revenue collection program
1. To maximize collection of local revenues
2. To conduct frequent appraisal and assessment of Real Property
Taxation
3. To sustain prudent budgeting for municipal development
4. To control disposition and utilization of government resources

1. Treasury Services Administration Program
2. Revenue Generation Program
3. Real Property Assessment Services Administration Program
4. Budgeting Services Administration Program
5. Accounting and Internal Control Services Administration
Program
1. Appropriation ordinance for funding support to fiscal
management programs
2. Revisit Revenue Tax Code and Local Incentives and Investment
Code

Sub-sector: LEGISLATIVE PERFORMANCE
Goal: Establish people and service-oriented governance

Development oriented Sangguniang Bayan
1. To formulate policies and enact ordinances beneficial to the
general public
2. To conduct training for capability building of local officials and
employees

1. Conduct Orientation for newly elected officials (NEO)
2. Conduct capability trainings for SB members and staff
1. Appropriation ordinance for funding to support legislative
performance

Sub-sector: LGU – CSO – PRIVATE SECTOR LINKAGES
Goal: Strengthen LGU- NGO/ PO Partnership
1. To produce sound development planning documents with
people’s participation and sectoral consultations

1. Planning and Development Services Administration Program
2. Year-round accreditation of NGOs and POs
1. Appropriation ordinance for funding to support LGU-CSO
Partnership
2. Resolution Accrediting of CSOs, NGOs and POs

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2023-2028
I. NAME OF PROJECTS Purchase of 8000 sq. m. additional lot for

Lungsodaan National High School
The 8000 square meter – lot is an
additional lot for Lungsodaan National High
School to come with the required land area
in order to accommodate buildings intended
for the K to 12 Program.
The proponent of this project is
Lungsodaan National High School,
Lungsodaan Southern Leyte.
II. ACTIVITY COMPONENTS 1. Planning Preparation – 3 months

Resolution
2. Program Implementation
2.1 Identification of lot affected
2.2 Verify with the Municipal Assessor
2.3 Negotiation with the land owners
2.4 Documentation (Deed of Absolute
Sale, etc)
2.5 Payment
III. ESTIMATED COST OF Php 1,000,000.00 Municipal Internal

RESOURCE INPUTS Revenue Allotment (IRA) and Special
Education Fund which is self – sustaining
Actual cost for every component of
the project is to be determined by the
Municipal Engineering Office.
IV. JUSTIFICATION OF THE The existing lot of Lungsodaan National High

PROJECT School does not meet the required land area
for public secondary school. Aside from that,
the remaining buildable space is not enough
for the incoming construction of academic,
laboratory and workshop buildings for the
Senior High School.
V. TARGET BENEFICIARIES Teachers and students of the concerned

school
VI. TARGET OUTPUTS OR Purchased 8,000 square meter lot

SUCCESS INDICATORS
VII. POSSIBLE RISKS OR
EXTERNAL FACTORS
THAT COULD FRUSTATE Refusal in the part of the land owner
THE REALIZATION OF
THE PROJECT
VIII. EXPECTED PRIVATE Involve during planning, implementation and
SECTOR RESPONSE monitoring of the project

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
I. NAME OF PROJECT
Repair of 24 dilapidated school
buildings and makeshifts
Fifteen (15) schools of Hinundayan
District have dilapidated buildings and
makeshift are still used despite of their
present condition.
The proponent of this project is
DepEd - Hinundayan District.
II. ACTIVITY COMPONENTS

Project planning, approval,
implemenatation, monitoring and
evaluation, and completion report
The DPWH is the lead department to
implement and monitor the different
activities of the project.
III. ESTIMATED COST OF

RESOURCE INPUTS Php 20,000,000.00 - Municipal Internal
Revenue Allotment (IRA) and Special
Education Fund which is self -
sustaining.
Materials, Human Resources
(Labor), Equipment, etc. are to be
determined through Programs of Works
by the Municipal Engineering Office
IV. JUSTIFICATION OF THE The school looks for the safety of the
PROJECT students. Utilizing dilapidated buildings
and makeshifts for classroom purposes
is contrary. Hence, this project is
imperative
V. TARGET BENEFICIARIES Students of the concerned schools
VI. TARGET OUTPUTS OR Twenty- four (24) repaired buildings and

SUCCESS makeshifts
INDICATORS
VII. POSSIBLE RISKS OR Delays in the implementation of the

EXTERNAL FACTORS THAT project due to weather condition
COULD FRUSTRATE THE
REALIZATION OF THE
PROJEECT
VIII. EXPECTED PRIVATE Involve during planning, implementation

SECTOR RESPONSE and monitoring of the project

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
I. NAME OF PROJECTS Strengthening the Learning of

Science with Robotics
II. ACTIVITY The Lungsodaan National HIgh School,

COMPONENTS Hinundayan District strongly believes
that the learners from all levels must be
prepared for the requirements of the
future and they can become more
engaged and interested in learning the
field of science with an experiential
learning approach with robotics
integration. This follows the need for the
preparation of teachers in equipping
themselves and the learners with the
technology tools to integrate robotics in
the curriculum. Initial efforts were made
in the Lungsodaan National High School
to cultivate the programming, critical-
thinking and creativity skills of students
through the resources brought by
teachers’ and students’ efforts of having
the robotics tools. However, this is not
enough to make an impact to its
learners because of the lack of
resources and teachers’ training in the
field.
III. ESTIMATED COST OF Php 125, 000.00

RESOURCE INPUTS
IV. JUSTIFICATION OF To achieve our goal in strengthening the
THE PROJECT teaching and learning of science
through robotics, this project aims to
develop teachers’ and students’ skills in
the field of robotics to produce more
competitive learners and graduates who
are ready to face the requirements of
industry 4.0 As our initial step to achieve
this objective, the integration of robotics
curriculum and exposing the students to
the use of robotics kits Science,
Technology, and Engineering (STE)
class from grade 7 to 10 in to reinforce
science topics, is part of this project.
Incorporating the lessons, activities,
exercises and drills in a mobile
application available to the learners
offline will make them prepare for actual
use of the robotics kits in the
classrooms as we now approach the
normalization of face to face classes.
Teachers’ training and preparation to
molding students for competitions not
only locally but in the international
context is also part of this project. These

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
are small steps that Lungsodaan

National HIgh School is initiating to fulfill
the thrust of strengthening technology
integration in the curriculum, starting
from the subject area of science. With
this, our learners are ready for the
requirements of this generation and
Lungsodaan National High School has
done its critical role of preparing them.
V. TARGET Learners from grade 7 to 10

BENEFICIARIES
VI. TARGET OUTPUTS OR ❖ Trained teachers and learners in

SUCCESS INDICATORS robotics as integrated science
❖ Teacher/coaches and learners are
equipped and skilled in
manipulating, programming and
assembling robot kit
❖ Integration of robotics in science
across learning areas
❖ Participation in local and
international robotics competitions
❖ Robotics to be paart of Hinundayan
District Science Fair Activities
❖ Organized robotics clubs in
Lungsodaan National HIgh School

EXTERNAL FACTORS
THAT COULD FRUSTATE Availability of robotics materials and
THE REALIZATION OF THE equipment
PROJECT
VIII. EXPECTED PRIVATE Positive acceptance of the project and

SECTOR RESPONSE possible replication for production

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
I. NAME OF PROJECT
Construction of 12 classroom building for
Senior High School of Lungsodaan
National HIgh School

Project planning, approval, implementation
monitoring and evaluation and completion
report. DPWH is the lead department to
implement and monitor the different activities
of the project
III. ESTIMATED COST OF

RESOURCE INPUTS 46 million (Php 46,000,000.00)
IV. JUSTIFICATION OF THE

PROJECT Six(6) classes are occupying substandard
classrooms occupying same room
simultaneously and no rooms to house
SMAW and EIM
V. TARGET BENEFICIARIES
Senior High School students of Lungsodaan
Ntional HIgh School
VI. TARGET OUTPUTS OR

SUCCESS Twelve (12) standard classrooms
INDICATORS constructed

EXTERNAL FACTORS THAT Occurrence of erratic weather
COULD FRUSTRATE THE conditions/meteorological phenomena in the
REALIZATION OF THE area which may hinder/cause the delay in
PROJEECT the completion of the project
VIII. EXPECTED PRIVATE

SECTOR RESPONSE Involve during planning, implementation and
monitoring of the project

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
I. NAME OF PROJECT
Repainting of District Office

Project planning, approval,
implementation, monitoring and
evaluation and completion
report
III. ESTIMATED COST OF RESOURCE

INPUTS Php 25,000.00
IV. JUSTIFICATION OF THE PROJECT

The office is not conducive for
office works. It should be
beautified thru painting
PSDS/school heads, teachers
and staff
VI. TARGET OUTPUTS OR SUCCESS

INDICATORS Completed repainting in the
District Office
VII. POSSIBLE RISKS OR EXTERNAL

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTRATE Vicissitudes of nature
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJEECT
VIII. EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR

RESPONSE Involve during planning,
implementation and monitoring
of the project

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
I. NAME OF PROJECT
Installation of Air Condition in District
Office

Planning, approval, implementation,
monitoring and evaluation lead by
Engineering Office for installation
III. ESTIMATED COST OF Php 30,000.00

RESOURCE INPUTS
IV. JUSTIFICATION OF THE

PROJECT The district office needs ventilation
because of humid weather condition
during summer. It will help in the general
welfare of the occupants of the office
PSDS, school heads, teachers and staff

SUCCESS INDICATORS One unit air condition is installed in the
office

EXTERNAL FACTORS THAT ❖ Delays of implementation due to lack
COULD FRUSTRATE THE of funds
REALIZATION OF THE ❖ Due to weather condition
PROJEECT
VIII. EXPECTED PRIVATE

SECTOR RESPONSE Involvement during planning,
implementation and monitoring of the
project

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
I. NAME OF PROJECTS Repair of twelve (12) classrooms in

the different schools of Hinundayan
District
II. ACTIVITY COMPONENTS Project planning, approval,
implementation, monitoring and
evaluation, and completion report
The Municipal Engineering office is
the lead department to implement and
monitor the different activities of the
project.
III. ESTIMATED COST OF Php 200,000.00
RESOURCE INPUTS
IV. JUSTIFICATION OF THE The repair of the classrooms are

PROJECT immediate after typhoon Odette no
classrooms available to house the
classes
V. TARGET BENEFECIARIES Learners of Hinundayan District

SUCCESS INDICATORS Completion of the repair as specified in
the Program of Works(POW)/Project
Estimate (PE)
VII. POSSIBLE RISKS OR ❖ Vicissitudes of nature

EXTERNAL FACTORS THAT ❖ Availability of materials
COULD FRUSTATE THE
REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT
VIII. EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR Planning, implementation, monitoring

RESPONSE and evaluation

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT ISSUANCE OF DEVELOPMENT

POLICIES, PASSAGE OF RESOLUTIONS
AND ENACTMENT OF ORDINANCE
This project aims to provide strategic
development policies, resolutions and
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
enactment of ordinances that redound to the
general welfare of the constituents
Research on development policies,

resolutions and enactment of ordinances
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S across sectors that redound to the general
welfare of the constituents
PROPONENT and PARTNER The LGU of Hinundayan in partnership with

ORGANIZATIONS other national line agencies
The issuance of development policies,

passage of resolutions and enactment of
RATIONALE ordinances are important in improving the
quality of economic growth in the
Municipality.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES The LGU of Hinundayan and its constituency
ESTIMATED COST PhP50,000.00
Development policies, passage of

TARGET OUTPUTS OR SUCCESS
resolutions and enactment of ordinances are
INDICATORS
provided
POSSIBLE RISKS OR EXTERNAL Unfunded commitments

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTRATE
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT
EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR Positive reception of the project

RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF LOCAL

MONITORING SERVICES COMMITTEE
BRIEF DESCRIPTION This program aims to monitor the status on

the implementation of LGUs programs and
projects with people’s participation
• Identification of personnel as
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S members of the Local Monitoring
Services Committee
• Budget allocation
PROPONENT and PARTNER The LGU of Hinundayan

ORGANIZATIONS
Local Monitoring Services Committee is a

special body of the Local Government Unit of
Hinundayan that is tasked to monitor and
evaluate infrastructure projects and
programs funded by the government in
RATIONALE Municipality Hinundayan.
It is important on the implementation on the
status of LGUs programs and projects to
ensure that development programs/projects
in the LGU of Hinundayan are implemented
according to accepted standards.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES The LGU of Hinundayan and all stakeholders
ESTIMATED COST Php50,000.00
LGUs programs and projects are well-

monitored
INDICATORS
POSSIBLE RISKS OR EXTERNAL
Lack of political will to fully implement the
programs/projects

RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT ACCREDITATION OF NGOs AND POs
This project aims to strengthen the LGUs

partnership with CSOs in the
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
implementation of PPAs to ensure in the
attainment of desired development results.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Inventory of CSOs

• Functional Local Special Bodies
PROPONENT and PARTNER The LGU of Hinundayan and NGOs and

ORGANIZATIONS POs in the municipality
The NGOs and POs become either

implementing partners or beneficiaries of
RATIONALE
LGUs programs and projects. It enhances
transparency and good governance
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES NGOs and POs
TARGET OUTPUTS OR SUCCESS • Establishment of

INDICATORS • Full participation of NGOs and POs
as active partners in local
governance
Non-willingness to submit administrative

requirements for accreditation
EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR Positive response

RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT REVENUE GENERATION PROGRAM
BRIEF DESCRIPTION This project aims to maximize the collection of

local revenues
• Revision of Local Revenue Tax Code

and Local Incentives and Investment
Code
• Automation of revenue collection system
• Tax mapping of business establishment
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Quarterly collection campaign in the
barangays
• Deployment of collectors
• General revision of real property records
• Modernization of real property tax
administration
PROPONENT and PARTNER LGU OF Hinundayan and BLGF,

ORGANIZATIONS Mun/Provincial Assessors
Revenue Generation program is important in

order to meet up with the foretasted goals
RATIONALE and services
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES The LGU of Hinundayan and the whole

ESTIMATED COST PhP1,500,000.00
More PPAs and more projects implemented

as a result of increased revenue
INDICATORS
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTRATE None

RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT SUPPORT TO BARANGAY PROGRAM
BRIEF DESCRIPTION This program aims to provide support to

barangay programs and projects
Allocation of funds to barangay projects and

PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S programs
PROPONENT and PARTNER The LGU of Hinundayan and the 17

ORGANIZATIONS barangays
The barangay, as basic political unit, serves

as the primary planning and implementing
RATIONALE
unit of government policies, plans, programs,
projects and activities in the community.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES The 17 barangays
Support provided
Barangay programs/projects implemented
INDICATORS
POSSIBLE RISKS OR EXTERNAL Non-submission of Fund Utilization Report


RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT CAPABILITY DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
This project aims to improve/enhance/capacitate

the potentials of municipal officials and
BRIEF DESCRIPTION employees for effective and efficient delivery of
basic services to its people
Conduct of trainings:
1. Local legislation and Parliamentary
Rules of Procedures (Newly Elected
Officials)
2. Performance Strategic and Management
System (SPMS)
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S
3. Quasi-judicial training
4. Financial Resource Management
(generating and managing financial and
other non-financial resources)
5. Human Resource Management
(Managerial and administrative skills
training)
PROPONENT and PARTNER Municipal Officials (Vice Mayor, SB

ORGANIZATIONS Members), SB staff and other concerned
employees
To determine what capabilities are there for
the officials and employees. Unlock their
potentials, equips them with skills and boost
confidence to ensure that municipal officials
and employees faithfully discharge their
duties and functions.
At present, the LGU has 12 elected officials,

85 regular employees, 110 job order for a
RATIONALE total of 207 officials and employees
implementing the different programs and
projects of the different local offices.
However, it was found out that there are
weaknesses in its implementation that need
to be improved re: Local legislation,
Revenue Generation, Resources Allocation
and Utilization, Customer Service-Civil
Applications and Development Training.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES 207 officials and employees

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
• Sufficiently trained and equipped SB

Members on local legislation and
INDICATORS
Quasi-judicial
• Sufficiently trained LGU employees
• Improve performance of local officials
and employees
• Increase revenue collection
• People and service oriented
governance
Non-attendance of concerned personnel

POSSIBLE RISKS OR EXTERNAL due to hectic and conflict of schedules in
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTRATE their respective offices

RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT CDRA Survey

Survey per barangay with barangay
representatives for identification and update
BRIEF DESCRIPTION of exposed communities, exposed critical
facilities and structures, exposed road
networks and exposed agricultural
production areas.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Survey per Barangay
PROPONENT and PARTNER MENRO, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO, DA,

ORGANIZATIONS Sangguniang Brgy. for DRRM
RATIONALE CDRA Survey is part of Disaster Prevention

& Mitigation.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 17 Barangays
ESTIMATED COST ₱ 30,000.00

Conducted survey per barangay with brgy.
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS representatives for identification and update
INDICATORS of exposed communities, exposed critical
facilities and structures, exposed road
networks and exposed agricultural
production areas.
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL No negative factors about the recipients
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE but PPA implementation can be delayed if
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT the climate is unfavorable.
EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR Their full support and positive cooperation

RESPONSE in program implementation are highly
expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Update CDRA
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Update CDRA for identification of newly

exposed communities, critical facilities/
structures, road networks and agricultural
production areas & marine facilities.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Update Exposed Communities;

• Update Exposed Critical Facilities/
Structures;
• Update Exposed Road Networks;
• Update Exposed Agricultural
Production Areas/ Marine Facilities.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MENRO, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO, DA,

ORGANIZATIONS Sangguniang Brgy. for DRRM
RATIONALE Update CDRA is part of Disaster Prevention

& Mitigation.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 27 pax
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Updated CDRA.

INDICATORS
No negative factors about the recipients
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL but PPA implementation can be delayed
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE due to difficulty in time coordination of
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT proponents & participants.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Construction of Climate Resilient / Flood

Control Drainage System at Brgys. District I
and District II.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Concrete Climate Resilient/ Flood Control

Drainage Canal at San Jose St., Bonifacio
St., Mabini St., Mate St., Antipala St., and
other Municipal Streets of Brgy. District I and
Brgy. District II.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Concreting of Canal

• Installation of Concrete Canal Cover
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MEO, MPDO,

ORGANIZATIONS MDRRMO
RATIONALE Construction of Climate Resilient / Flood

Control Drainage System at Brgys. District I
and District II is part of Disaster Prevention
and Mitigation.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES People of Brgys:

• District I : 724
• District II : 1,004
ESTIMATED COST ₱ 15,000,000.00

Constructed climate resilient/ flood control
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS drainage system at San Jose St., Bonifacio
INDICATORS St., Mabini St., Mate St., Antipala St., and
other Mun. Streets of Brgy. District I and
Brgy. District II.
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL No negative factors about the recipients but

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE there is uncertainty as to funding source.
Their full support and positive cooperation

EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR in program implementation are highly
RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Control Drainage System at Brgy. District
III.

Drainage Canal at Municipal Streets of Brgy.
District III.

PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Construction of Climate Resilient / Flood

Control Drainage System at Brgy. District III
is part of Disaster Prevention and
Mitigation.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES People of Brgy:

• District III: 1,138
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed climate resilient/ flood control

INDICATORS drainage system at Brgy. District III.


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Control Drainage System at Brgy.
Lungsodaan.

Drainage Canal at Streets of Brgy.
Lungsodaan.


ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Construction of Climate Resilient/ Flood

Control Drainage System at Brgy.
Lungsodaan is part of Disaster Prevention
and Mitigation.

• Lungsodaan: 1,380

Construction of climate resilient/ flood
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS control drainage system at Brgy.
INDICATORS Lungsodaan.

RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Construction of Creek and Riverbank

Protection
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Concrete Slope Protection of Creeks and

Rivers of Brgys. Cat- iwing, Sagbok, Dist. II,
Biasong, Dist. III, Lungsodaan, Dist. I and
Ambao.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Concreting of Dikes/ Slopes

• Concreting of Pathway

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Construction of Creek and Riverbank

Protection is part of Disaster Prevention
and Mitigation.

• Cat- iwing : 469
• Sagbok : 1,021
• Biasong : 790
• District III : 1,138
• Lungsodaan : 1,380
• Ambao : 950
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed creek and riverbank protection

INDICATORS for the following communities:
• Cat- iwing
• Sagbok
• District II
• Biasong
• District III
• Lungsodaan
• District I
• Ambao.

RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Construction of Seawall
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Concrete Seawall with Baywalk

Component of Brgys. Cat- iwing, Sagbok,
Ambao and Sabang.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Concreting of Seawall

• Concreting of Baywalk
PROPONENT and PARTNER

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO
RATIONALE Construction of Seawall is part of Disaster

Prevention and Mitigation.

• Sagbok : 1,021
• Ambao : 950
• Sabang : 657
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed seawall with baywalk

INDICATORS component at Brgys.:
• Cat - iwing
• Sagbok
• Ambao
• Sabang.


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Construction of Concrete Irrigation Canal at

Camunga-an.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION About 100 m Concrete Irrigation Canal at

Camunga-an.
• Concreting of Canal

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO
RATIONALE Construction of Concrete Irrigation Canal

at Camunga-an is part of Disaster
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES Farmers of:
• Camunga-an : 603
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed Concrete Irrigation Canal at

INDICATORS Camunga-an.

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE PPA implementation can be delayed due to
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT unfavorable weather.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Annual Tree Growing
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Annual tree growing at:

• District I Beachline -Talisay Trees
• District II Beachline -Talisay Trees
• Lungsodaan Riverside – Bamboo Trees
• Cat- iwing Uplands – Hard Wood Trees
• Cabulisan Uplands – Hard Wood Trees
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Annual tree growing at:

• Talisay Tree growing at District I Beachline
• Talisay Tree growing at District II Beachline
• Bamboo Tree growing at Lungsodaan
Riverside
• Hard Wood Tree growing at Cat- iwing
Uplands
• Hard Wood Tree growing at Cabulisan
Uplands

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MENRO, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO
RATIONALE
Annual Tree Growing is part of Disaster
• Lungsodaan : 1,380
• Cabulisan : 301

Conducted annual tree growing at:
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS • District I Beachline Talisay
INDICATORS • District II BeachlineTalisay
• Lungsodaan Riverside Bamboos
• Cat- iwing Uplands Hard Woods
• Cabulisan Uplands Hard Woods.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT unfavorable weather.
Their full support and positive cooperation in

EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR program implementation are highly expected.
RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Declogging of Canals and Creeks
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Canal and Creek Declogging at:

• Barangay Dist. I
• Barangay District II
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Declogging of canals and creeks;

once a year or as the need arise at
Barangay District I;
• Declogging of canals and creeks;

once a year or as the need arise at
Barangay District II;

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MENRO, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO
RATIONALE Declogging of Canals and Creeks is part of

Disaster Prevention and Mitigation.
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted declogging of canals and

INDICATORS creeks; once a year or the need rise at :
• Brgy. District I
• District II.
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL None

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Construction of Flood Control Drainage

Canal at LNHS
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Concrete Flood Control Drainage Canal at

Lungsodaan National High School (LNHS),
Brgy. Lungsodaan.

• Installation of Steel Bar Cover
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MEO, MPDC, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Construction of Flood Control Drainage

Canal at LNHS is part of Disaster
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES School Population of:
• LNHS: 1,458
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed LNHS Concrete Drainage

INDICATORS Canal.

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE there is Uncertainty in the negotiation with
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT the lot owners in the proposed waterway
outside school.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Construction of Flood Control Drainage

Canal at HCS
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Concrete Flood Control Drainage Canal at

Hinundayan Central School (HCS), Brgy.
District III.

• Installation of Steel Bar Cover
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MEO, MPDC, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Construction of Flood Control Drainage

Canal at HCS is part of Disaster Prevention
and Mitigation.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES School Population of:
• HCS: 346

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed HCS Concrete Drainage
INDICATORS Canal.
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT inadequate technical manpower of the
implementing office
EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR
RESPONSE Their full support and positive cooperation
in program implementation are highly
expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Procurement of Lots for Additional

Evacuation Centers.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Lot Appropriate for Evacuation Centers
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of Lot

• Titling of Lot
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MASSO, MPDO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of Lots for Additional

Evacuation Centers is part of Disaster

• Baculod : 1, 079
• Bugho : 951
• Sagbok : 1,021
• Hubasan : 614
• An- An : 599
• Ambao : 950

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured lots for additional Mun. Standard
INDICATORS Evacuation Centers at brgys:
• Baculod
• Bugho
• Sagbok
• Hubasan
• An-an
• Cat- iwing
• Ambao.

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE there is difficulty in looking for appropriate
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT lot.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Construction of Mun. Standard Evacuation

Center at Brgy. Baculod.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION One (1) Standard Evacuation Center at

Brgy. Baculod.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Standard Evacuation Center Building

Construction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Construction of Mun. Standard Evacuation
Center at Brgy. Baculod is part of Prevention
and Mitigation.
• Baculod : 1,079

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed one (1) Mun. Standard
INDICATORS Evacuation Center at Brgy. Baculod.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Center at Brgy. Bugho.

Brgy. Bugho.

Costruction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Construction of Mun. Standard Evacuation

Center at Brgy. Bugho is part of Disaster
• Bugho : 951

INDICATORS Evacuation Center at Brgy. Bugho.
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE there are uncertainties in looking for
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT appropriate lot and funding source.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Center at Brgy. Sagbok.

Brgy. Sagbok.

Construction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Center at Brgy. Sagbok is part of Prevention
and Mitigation.
• Sagbok : 1, 021
• Plaridel : 367

INDICATORS Evacuation Center at Brgy. Sagbok.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Center at Brgy. Hubasan.

Brgy. Hubasan.

Construction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Center at Brgy. Hubasan is part of Disaster
• Hubasan : 614
• Cabulisan : 301

INDICATORS Evacuation Center at Brgy. Hubasan.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Center at Brgy. An- An.

Brgy. An- An.

Construction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Center at Brgy. An- An is part of Prevention
and Mitigation.
• An- An : 599

INDICATORS Evacuation Center at Brgy. An- an.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Center at Brgy. Cat- iwing.

Brgy. Cat- iwing.

Construction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Center at Brgy. Cat- iwing is part of

INDICATORS Evacuation Center at Brgy. Cat- iwing.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Center at Brgy. Ambao.

Brgy. Ambao.

Construction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Center at Brgy. Ambao is part of Disaster
• Ambao : 950
• Amaga : 318

INDICATORS Evacuation Center at Brgy. Ambao.
RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Center with Storage Facility
BRIEF DESCRIPTION One (1) additional Mun. Evacuation Center

Building (Bldg. III) at Brgy. Biasong with
Storage Facility.

Construction
• Storage Facility Construction

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Center with Storage Facility is part of
Disaster Prevention and Mitigation.
• Biasong : 790
• District III :1,138
• District II :1,004
• Navalita : 719
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Constructed additional Evacuation Center

INDICATORS Building (Bldg. III) w/ storage facility at
Biasong Mun. Evacuation Center.


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Continuing Construction of Concrete

Irrigation Canals
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Continued Concrete Irrigation Canals at:
• Cogon – Biasong;
• Camungaan;
• Panansalan;
• Cabongbongan.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Concreting of Irrigation Canals at

Cogon- Biasong (Continuation);
• Concreting of Irrigation Canals at
Camungaan (Continuation);
Panansalan (Continuation);
Cabongbongan (Continuation);
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, OMAS, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Continuing Construction of Concrete
Irrigation Canals is part of Disaster
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES Farmers of:

• Cogon- Biasong : 531
• Camungaan : 603
• Panansalan : 302
• Cabongbongan : 488
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Continued Construction of Concrete

INDICATORS Irrigation Canals at:
• Cogon – Biasong
• Camungaan
• Panansalan
• Cabongbongan.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Procurement and Installation of Machine for

Eco- Friendly Ultra High Thermal
Decomposition System
BRIEF DESCRIPTION One (1) Set Machine for Eco- Friendly Ultra
High Thermal Decomposition System.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of one (1) Machine for Eco-

Friendly Ultra High Thermal
Decomposition System.
• Installation of one (1) Machine for Eco-
Friendly Ultra High Thermal
Decomposition System.
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MENRO, MEO, MPDO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement and Installation of Machine for

Eco- Friendly Ultra High Thermal
Decomposition System is part of Prevention
and Mitigation.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Households of Hinundayan : 3,500
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured one (1) machine for Eco –

INDICATORS Friendly Ultra High Thermal Decomposition
System.


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT DRRM Human Resource Development
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Human Resource Development through

hiring of additional Regular Plantilla Item
Personnel, MDRRMC Re- organization,
BDRRMC Strengthening and Organization
of the ACDVs & CFAGs.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Hiring of Additional Regular Plantilla Item

Personnel;
• MDRRMC Re- organization;
• BDRRMC Strengthening;
• Organization of the ACDVs;
• Organization of the CFAGs.
PROPONENT and PARTNER • MLGU of Hinundayan

ORGANIZATIONS • BLGUs of Hinundayan
RATIONALE DRRM Human Resource Development is

part of the Disaster Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 3 LGU Personnel

• 1 MDRRMC
• 17 BDRRMCs
• 17 ACDVs
• 17 CFAGs

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS • Augmented number of regular plantilla
INDICATORS item personnel
• Re-Organized MDRRMC
• Strengthened BDRRMCs
• Organized Accredited Community
Disaster Volunteers (ACDVs)
• Organized Community Fire Auxiliary
Groups (CFAG)
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL PS Cap limitation and Lack of Training


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT ELDRRM Planning Workshop and

CBDRRM Planning Workshop
BRIEF DESCRIPTION ELDRRM Planning for the LGU and

CBDRRM Planning for the 17 barangays.
• ELDRRM Planning for the LGU;
• CBDRRM Planning for the 17 barangays.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, LIGA, PDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE ELDRRM Planning for the LGU and

CBDRRM Planning Workshop for the 17
barangays are part of Disaster
Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 1 LGU

• 17 Barangays

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted ELDRRM Planning for the LGU
INDICATORS and CBDRRM Planning for the 17 Brgys.
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL Difficulty in Time Coordination of Training
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Recipients & Trainers.
RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Standard First Aid (SFA) and Basic Life

Support (BLS) Training for HEROs
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Standard First Aid (SFA) and Basic Life

Support (BLS) Training as capacity building
activities for the Hinundayan Emergency
Response Operatives (HEROs).
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Standard First Aid (SFA) Training;

• Basic Life Support (BLS) Training.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, TACRO, Red Cross

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Standard First Aid (SFA) and Basic Life

Support (BLS) Training are part of the
capacity building activities for the
Hinundayan Emergency Response
Operatives (HEROs) and part of Disaster
Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES 50 HEROs

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Safety First Aid (SFA) and Basic
INDICATORS Life Support (BLS) Training as capacity
building activities for the Hinundayan
Emergency Response Operatives (HERO).

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Basic Incident Command System (BICS)

Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Basic Incident Command System (BICS)

Training as capacity building activities for the
MDRRMC Key Personnel and Action
Teams.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Basic Incident Command System (BICS)

Training:
• Basic Concept and Principles;
• Functions.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, OCD

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Basic Incident Command System (BICS)

Training is part of Disaster Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 40 Pax
ESTIMATED COST ₱ 485, 000.00
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Basic Incident Command

INDICATORS System (BICS) Training.


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Emergency Operation (EOC) Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Emergency Operation (EOC) Training as

capacity building activities for MDRRMC
Key Personnel and Action Teams.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Emergency Operation (EOC) Training for:

• Response Clusters;
• Incident Management Teams.

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Emergency Operation (EOC) Training is

part of Disaster Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Emergency Operation (EOC)
INDICATORS Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic Life Support

(BLS) and Fire Suppression (FS) Training
for BERTS
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic Life Support

(BLS) and Fire Suppression (FS) Training as
capacity building activities for Barangay
Emergency Response Teams (BERTs).
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Standard First Aid (SFA) Training;

• Basic Life Support (BLS) Training;
• Fire Suppression (FS) Training.

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic Life Support

(BLS) and Fire Suppression (FS) Training
are capacity building activities for Barangay
Emergency Response Teams (BERTs) are
also part of Disaster Preparedness.
ESTIMATED COST ₱ 250, 000. 00

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic
INDICATORS Life Support (BLS) and Fire Suppression
(SF) Training as capacity building activities
for Brgy. Emergency Response Teams
(BERTs).
expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Radio Communication Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Radio Communication Training for OPCEN

and Representatives from BERTs.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Radio Operations Capacity Building
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, DICT

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Radio Communication Training is part of

Disaster Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 50 Pax (OPCEN)

• 17 BERTs

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Radio Communication Training.
INDICATORS

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Emergency Medical Responders Training –

Level II
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Emergency Medical Responders Training –

Level II for Hinundayan Emergency
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Introduction to EMS;

• Legal & Ethical Principles;
• Wellness & Safety of EM Responders;
• Spine Board Management;
• Principles of Effective Communication &
Documentations;
• Airway Management & Ventilation;
• Oxygen Therapy;
• Resuscitation & use of AED;
• Obtaining Vital Signs & History;
• Principles of Patient Assessment.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, TACRO,

ORGANIZATIONS Philippine Red Cross
RATIONALE Emergency Medical Responders Training –

Level II is part of Disaster Preparedness.
ESTIMATED COST ₱250,000.00

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Emergency Medical
INDICATORS Responders Training – Level II.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Basic Incident Command System (BICS)

Training- Level II
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Conduct Basic Incident Command System

(BICS) Training- Level II as capacity
building activities for the MDRRMC Key
Personnel and relevant Action Teams.
• Integrated Planning Course

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Basic Incident Command System (BICS)

Training- Level II is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Basic Incident Command
INDICATORS System Training-Level II.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Contingency Planning
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Conduct Contingency Planning for various

hazards.
Contingency Planning for:

• Flooding;
• Landslide;
• Storm Surge;
• Liquefaction;
• Typhoon;
• Earthquake;
• COVID – EREID.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, OCD, MPDO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Contingency Planning is part of Disaster
Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES 40 Pax

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Contingency Planning for:
INDICATORS • Flooding;
• Landslide;
• Storm Surge;
• Liquefaction;
• Typhoon;
• Earthquake;
• COVID – EREID.
expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Disaster Data and Information Management

Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Disaster Data and Information Management

Training for DRRM Data Gatherings,
Encoders and Information Managers.
• Disaster Data Collection Procedures;
• Disaster Data Management Course.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MSWDO, DSWD, MDRRMO, LIGA

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Disaster Data and Information Management

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Disaster Data and Information
INDICATORS Management Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Camp Coordination and Center

Management (CCCM) Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Camp Coordination and Center

Management (CCCM) Training for
Evacuation Center Managers and Crew.
• Camp Coordination Protocols;
• Evacuation Center Management
Course.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MSWDO, DSWD, MDRRMO, DepEd

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Camp Coordination and Center
Management (CCCM) Training is part of
ESTIMATED COST ₱ 100, 000. 00

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Camp Coordination and Center
INDICATORS Management (CCCM) Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rapid and Damage & Needs Analysis

(RDANA) Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Rapid and Damage & Needs Analysis
(RDANA) Training for MDRRMC Key
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procedures on Rapid Analysis;

• Procedures on Damage and Needs
Analysis.

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Rapid and Damage & Needs Analysis
(RDANA) Training is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Rapid and Damage & Needs
INDICATORS Analysis (RDANA) Training.


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Flood and Swift Water Rescue Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Flood and Swift Water Rescue Training for
Operatives (HEROs).
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Water Rescue Training Course

ORGANIZATIONS Coast Guard
RATIONALE
Flood and Swift Water Rescue Training is

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Flood Swift Water Rescue
RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Post Disaster Needs Assessment

(PDANA) Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDANA)
Training for MDRRMC Key Personnel and
relevant Action Teams.
• Assessment Protocols of Post Disaster
Needs;
• Integrated Planning.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MPDO, MDRRMO, PDRRMO, OCD, MEO,

ORGANIZATIONS MASSO
RATIONALE
Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDANA)

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Post Disaster Needs Assessment
INDICATORS (PDANA) Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Public Service Continuity Planning
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Public Service Continuity Planning for

MDRRMC Key Personnel and relevant
Action Teams.
• Public Service Continuity Planning
Course

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Public Service Continuity Planning is part of

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Public Service Continuity
INDICATORS Planning.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation and Recovery Planning
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Rehabilitation and Recovery Planning for
MDRRMC Key Personnel and relevant
Action Teams.
• Rehabilitation and Recovery Planning
Course

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Rehabilitation and Recovery Planning is


TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Rehabilitation and Recovery
INDICATORS Planning.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Warehouse, Financial, Supply Chain,

Inventory and Relief Goods Management
Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
• Warehouse Management
• Financial Management
• Supply Chain Inventory Management
• Relief Goods Management
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Warehouse, Financial, Supply Chain,

Training Course
PROPONENT and PARTNER MSWDO, DSWD, MTO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Warehouse, Financial, Supply Chain,

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Warehouse, Financial, Supply
INDICATORS Chain, Inventory and Relief Goods
Management Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Operation LISTO Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Operation LISTO Training for MDRRMC Key
• Operation LISTO Training Course.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, DILG

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Operation LISTO Training is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS
INDICATORS Conducted Operation LISTO Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Logistics Management Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Logistics Management Trainings for
Personnel involved in Logistics.
• Logistics Management Training
Course.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MSWDO, DSWD, MTO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Logistics Management Training is part of

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Logistics Management Trainings.
INDICATORS

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Management of the Dead and Missing

Training Course
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Management of the Dead and Missing

Training Course for MDRRMC Key
• Training Course re: Management of
the Dead and Missing
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, DILG

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Management of the Dead and Missing

Training Course is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Management of the Dead and
INDICATORS Missing Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Search and Rescue (SAR) Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Search and Rescue (SAR) Training for
Operatives (HEROs).
• Search and Rescue (SAR) Training
Course
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, TACRO, Red Cross,

ORGANIZATIONS AFP
RATIONALE Search and Rescue (SAR) Training is part

of Disaster Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Search and Rescue (SAR)

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Water Search and Rescue (WASAR)

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Water Search and Rescue (WASAR)
Training for Hinundayan Emergency
• Water Search and Rescue (WASAR)
Training Course.

ORGANIZATIONS Philippine Coast Guard
RATIONALE Water Search and Rescue (WASAR)


TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Water Search and Rescue
INDICATORS (WASAR) Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
High Angle Search and Rescue Operation

BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Training for Hinundayan Emergency
• High Angle Search and Rescue
Operation Training Course

ORGANIZATIONS BFP
RATIONALE
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted High Angle Search and Rescue

INDICATORS Operation Training.
RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Mountain Search and Rescue (MOSAR)

BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Training Hinundayan Emergency Response
Operatives (HEROs).
• Mountain Search and Rescue
(MOSAR) Training Course.

ORGANIZATIONS AFP
RATIONALE
Training as part of Disaster Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Mountain Search and Rescue
INDICATORS (MOSAR) Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic Life Support

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT (BLS) and Fire Suppression (FS) Training for
the Community

(BLS) and Fire Suppression (FS) Training for
the Community Training (at least one (1)
household member as attendee), part of
capacitating the community.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic Life Support

the Community:
• Sphere I
• Sphere II
• Sphere III

ORGANIZATIONS Philippine Red Cross

(BLS) and Fire Suppression (FS) for the
Community Training (at least one (1)
household member as attendee) is part of

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conduct Standard First Aid (SFA), Basic
(FS) for the Community Training (atleast
one (1) household member as attendee).
RESPONSE expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

the Vulnerable Sectors

the Vulnerable Sectors such as pregnant,
PWDs, senior citizens and children, part of
capacitating the community.
• Standard First Aid (SFA);
• Basic Life Support (BLS);
• Fire Suppression (FS).

ORGANIZATIONS

the Vulnerable Sectors is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

(FS) Training for the Vulnerable Sectors
(pregnants, PWDs, senior citizens and
children.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

School DRRM Coordinators

School DRRM Coordinators for immediate
response during school emergencies.
• Standard First Aid (SFA);
• Fire Suppression (FS).

ORGANIZATIONS

School DRRM Coordinators is part of

(FS) Training for School DRRM
Coordinators.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

the Youth (SK)

the Youth (SK), part of capacitating the
community.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Standard First Aid (SFA);

• and Fire Suppression (FS).

ORGANIZATIONS

the Youth (SK) is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

(FS) Training for the Youth (SK).

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Orientation Forum for the Regular Conduct

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT of Community Disaster Simulation Drills
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Orientation forum for the regular conduct of

community disaster simulation drills.
• Forum for the regular conduct of
community disaster simulation drills
requiring at least one (1) household
member as participant.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, LIGA

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Orientation forum for the regular conduct of

community disaster simulation drills
requiring at least one (1) household
member as participant is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted orientation forum for the regular
INDICATORS conduct of community disaster simulation
drills requiring at least one (1) household
member as participant.
expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Sexual and Reproductive Health Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for

Sexual and Reproductive Health Training.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Minimum Initial Service Package

(MISP) for Sexual and Reproductive
Health Training Course.
PROPONENT and PARTNER RHU, DOH, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Minimum Initial Service Package (MISP) for

Sexual and Reproductive Health Training is

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Minimum Initial Service
INDICATORS Package (MISP) for Severe and
Reproduction Health Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Water and Sanitation for Health (WASH)

BRIEF DESCRIPTION Water and Sanitation for Health (WASH)

Training for selected RHU Personnel &
selected BHWs.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Water and Sanitation for Health

(WASH) Training Course

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Water and Sanitation for Health (WASH)

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Water and Sanitaion for Health
INDICATORS (WASH) Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Nutrition in Emergencies Training

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Nutrition in Emergencies Training for

selected RHU Personnel and selected
BHWs.
• Nutrition in Emergencies Training
Course

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Nutrition in Emergencies Training is part of

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Nutrition in Emergencies

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Mental Health and Psychosocial Support

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT (MHPSS) Training
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Mental Health and Psychosocial Support

(MHPSS) Training for selected RHU
Personnel and selected BHWs.
• Mental Health and Psychosocial
Support (MHPSS) Training Course
PROPONENT and PARTNER RHU, DOH

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Mental Health and Psychosocial Support
(MHPSS) Training is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Mental Health and Psychosocial
INDICATORS Support (MHPSS) Training.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
ELDRRM Planning Workshop (2025-2028)

BRIEF DESCRIPTION Conduct ELDRRM Planning Workshop

(2025-2028) for the period 2025 - 2028.
• Conduct of ELDRRM Planning Workshop
(2025-2028) for the period 2025 - 2028.
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Conduct ELDRRM Planning Workshop

(2025-2028) is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted ELDRRM Planning Workshop
INDICATORS (2025-2028).

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Procurement of Stockpiling
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Stockpiling of Food Packs, Hygiene Kits,

Dignity Kits, Sleeping Kits & Campolas Kits
(Emergency Medicines).
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Procurement and Provision of:

• Food
• Hygiene Kits
• Sleeping Kits
• Tents
• Medicines

ORGANIZATIONS MSWDO, MTO, RHU
Procurement and stockpiling of Food Packs,

RATIONALE Hygiene Kits, Dignity Kits, Sleeping Kits &
Campolas Kits are part of Disaster
Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Households of Hinundayan: 3, 500
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured and stockpiling of:

INDICATORS • Food
• Hygiene Kits
• Sleeping Kits
• Tents
Medicines
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL No negative factor about the recipients that
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE can prohibit the attainment of PPA but
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT procuring entity has inadequacy of proper
storage.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of Radio Tower, Base &

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Handheld Radios for the Establishment of
Radio Communication System
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Radio Communication System within AOR.
Establishment of Radio Communication
System by procuring and installing the
following;
• Repeater / Tower
• Base Radio
• Hand Held Radio
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, PDRRMO, DICT

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Establishment of Radio Communication

System is part of Disaster Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 1 OPCEN

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Established Radio Communication System by
INDICATORS procuring and installing the following;
• Repeater/ Antenna - 1 tower
• Base Radio - 4 units
• Hand Held Radio - 10 units.
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL No negative factors about the recipients.


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of Communication Equipments

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT for OPCEN IECs
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Projector and Laptop for OPCEN IECs
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of Projector and Laptop
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of Projector and Laptop as

OPCEN IECs is part of Disaster
Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured one (1) Projector and one (1)
INDICATORS Laptop for OPCEN IECs.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement & Installation of Early Warning

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Markers, Devices & Signages
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Procurement & Installation of Early Warning

Markers, Devices & Signages at specified
location as IECS and Early - Warning.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Procurement and Installation of:
• Early Warning Markers

• Early Warning Devices
• Early Warning Signages

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement and Installation of Early

Warning Markers, Devices and Signages is
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 17 Barangays

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured and Installed Early Warning
INDICATORS Markers, Devices and Signages.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement & Installation of Siren

BRIEF DESCRIPTION One (1) Long Sound Reach Range

Electronic Siren.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of Siren;

• Installation of Siren.

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement and installation of one (1)

Long Sound Reach Range Electronic Siren
is part of Disaster Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES Whole Municipality

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured and installed one (1) Long Sound
INDICATORS Reach Range Electronic Siren.
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE No negative factors about the recipients.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of Satellite Phone & VSAT

BRIEF DESCRIPTION Communication Tools that can be used in

areas without cellphone signal and internet
signal.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Procurement of:
• Satellite Phone
• VSAT (Very Small Aperture
Terminal).
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMO, DICT

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of satellite phone & VSAT is


TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured one (1) unit Satellite Phone and
INDICATORS Procured VSAT (Very Small Aperture
Terminal).

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of DRRM Tools

BRIEF DESCRIPTION DRRM Tools for Disaster Preparedness.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Procurement of:
• Rescue Rope;
• Life Jackets & Flotation/ Life Buoy
Ring;
• Head Immobilizer, Spider Strap &
Cervical Collar;
• Rescue Helmets and Head Lamps;
• Rescue Gloves and Boots;
• Bolos;
• Poncho Protective Raincoats;
• Medical Kits with Pulse Oximeter &
BP Apparatus;
• Water Resistant Rechargeable
Flashlights, 800 lumens super
bright;
• Search Light, 850 lumens super
bright, big heavy duty &
rechargeable;
• Tower Flood Lights;
• Whistles;
• Safety Googles;
• Diving Goggles;
• Life Jackets;
• Scoop Stretchers
• Basket Stretchers
• Body Bags
• Fire Extinguishers
MDRRMO
ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Procurement of Rescue Tools are part of

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
• 50 HEROs
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured DRRM Tools.

INDICATORS
EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR Positive

RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of Two (2) Units Motorcycles

BRIEF DESCRIPTION Two (2) units motorcycles for response,

rescue and monitoring operations.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of two (2) units

motorcycles.

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of two (2) units motorcycles is

INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Two (2) Teams of HEROs

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured two (2) units motorcycles.
INDICATORS

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement/ Fabrication of Two (2) Units

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Motorized Boats
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Two (2) units motorized boats for response,

water rescue and water monitoring
operations.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Two (2) units motorized boats
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, OMAS, PNP, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement/ Fabrication of Two (2) Units

Motorized Boats is part of Disaster
Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Two (2) Teams of HEROs

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured/Fabricated two (2) units Motorized
INDICATORS Boats.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of one (1) unit Drone

BRIEF DESCRIPTION One (1) unit Drone for response, rescue

and monitoring operations.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of Drone.
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, OMAS, PNP, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of one (1) unit Drone is part of

INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • One (1) Team of HEROs

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured of one (1) unit Drone.
INDICATORS

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of Generator
BRIEF DESCRIPTION One (1) unit 10 KVA Generator for the

Evacuation Center.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of one (1) unit 10 KVA

Generator;
• Installation of one (1) unit 10 KVA
Generator at Brgy. Biasong Municipal
Evacuation Center.

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of one (1) unit 10 KVA

Generator for the Evacuation Center is part
of Disaster Preparedness.
:
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 1 Evacuation Center

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured one (1) unit 10 KVA Generator for
INDICATORS the Biasong Mun. Evacuation Center.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of two (2) units Mass

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Transport Truck
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Two (2) units Mass Transport Truck for

Mass Evacuation, Logistics, Response,
Rescue and Relief Operations.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of two (2) units Mass

Transport Truck
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MTO, MSWDO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of two (2) unit Mass

Transport Truck is part of Disaster
Preparedness.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Households of Hinundayan: 3,500

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured two (2) units Mass Transport
INDICATORS Truck.
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE there is uncertainty of funding source.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of two (2) units Mini – Dump

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Truck
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Two (2) units Mini – Dump Truck for Mass
Evacuation, Logistics, Response, Rescue
and Relief Operations.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of two (2) units Mini – Dump

Truck
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MTO, MSWDO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of two (2) units Mini – Dump

Truck is part of Disaster Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured two (2) units Mini – Dump Truck.
INDICATORS

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of One (1) unit Manlift

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Equipment
BRIEF DESCRIPTION One (1) Manlift for immediate clearing

operations.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of one (1) unit Manlift.
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MENRO. MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Procurement of Manlift Vehicle is part of

INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Hinundayan: One (1) AOR
ESTIMATED COST ₱ 7, 000,000.00

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured one (1) unit Manlift Equipment.
INDICATORS

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Procurement of One (1) Unit Crawler Type

NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Backhoe
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
One (1) unit Crawler Type Backhoe for
response, rescue and clearing operations.
• Procurement of one (1) unit Crawler Type
Backhoe.
PROPONENT and PARTNER M.O, MENRO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE
Procurement of one (1) unit Crawler Type
Backhoe is part of Disaster Preparedness.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Procured one (1) unit Crawler Type
INDICATORS Backhoe.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Immediate General Clearing Operations
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Conduct immediate general clearing

operations (procure fuels & hire chainsaw
operators & other workers).
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of Fuels;

• Hire Chainsaw Operators/ Workers;
• Actual Clearing Activities.

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MENRO, MTO
RATIONALE Conduct immediate general clearing

operations (procure fuels & hire chainsaw
operators & other workers) are part of
immediate Disaster Response Activities.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • 17 barangays

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted immediate general clearing
INDICATORS operations and procured fuels & hired
chainsaw operators & other workers.
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL Support Staff of Local proponents at the
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE same time recipients may also be severely
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT affected.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Maintenance of Peace and Order
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Security to all critical properties and

resources whether human or in kind.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Security to critical properties such as

evacuation centers, warehouses, access
roads and other properties and facilities;
• Security to all critical resources whether
human or in kind.

ORGANIZATIONS PNP, AFP, Brgy. Tanods
RATIONALE Maintenance of Peace and Order is a Vital

Disaster Response Activity.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES Constituents of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Secured critical properties and resources in
INDICATORS the threatened areas and provided needed
security support to other action teams,
disaster sites, access roads, evacuation
centers and warehouses.
EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR
RESPONSE Their full support and positive cooperation
in program implementation are highly
expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Search, Rescue, Retrieval and Fire

Suppression
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Search, Rescue, Retrieval and Fire

Suppression as immediate response activity.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Search Operations

• Rescue Operations
• Retrieval Operations
• Fire Suppression Operations

ORGANIZATIONS MDRRMO, PNP, BFP, DILG, RHU, DOH,
DPWH, OCD, PRC, PCG, Volunteer
Groups/ NGOs
RATIONALE Search, Rescue, Retrieval and Fire

Suppression are Vital Response Activities.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted immediate search, rescue,
INDICATORS retrieval and fire suppression operations.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Health and Sanitation
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Health Care

• Sanitation Concerns
• Emergency Medical Care
• Psycho Social Care

ORGANIZATIONS MHO/RHU, DOH, IPHO
RATIONALE Health and Sanitation are Vital Disaster

Response Activities.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted immediate activities to ensure
INDICATORS health & sanitation.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rapid Damage Assessment and Needs

Analysis
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Quick Damage Assessment and Analysis

Needs
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Monitoring and Evaluation of Present

Risks
• Quick Damage Assessment
• Needs Analysis
PROPONENT and PARTNER MDRRMC – Disaster Preparedness and

ORGANIZATIONS Analysis Team
MDRRMC – Damage and Needs
Assessment Team
RATIONALE RDANA is a Vital Disaster Response

Activities.

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Rapid Damage Assessment and
INDICATORS Needs Analysis.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Relief Operations
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Distribution of Food and Non- Food Items

(NFIs) and other assistance to all affected
households.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Provision of Food

• Provision of Hygiene Kits
• Provision of Sleeping Kits
• Provision of Tents
• Provision of Medicines
• Provision of Cash for Work
• Provision of Cash Assistance

ORGANIZATIONS MSWDO, MTO, DSWD, NGAs,
League of Barangays
RATIONALE Relief Operations are Very Vital in Disaster

Response

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS • Provided of Food
INDICATORS • Provided Hygiene Kits
• Provided Sleeping Kits
• Provided Tents
• Provided Medicines
• Provided Cash for Work
• Provided Cash Assistance


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Immediate Continuity of Education
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Immediate Continuity of Education as

measure of not hampering the education of
school age individuals.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Inspection of all Schools

• Status Reporting
• Ways & Means for the Immediate
Continuity of Education

ORGANIZATIONS DepEd, SK Federation, MEO
RATIONALE Immediate Continuity of Education is a Vital

Response Activity.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Elementary Pupils: 1,556

• High School/ Senior High School: 1,729

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted emergency activities to ensure
INDICATORS immediate continuity of education.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Post Disaster Needs Analysis
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Analysis of Post Disaster Situation and

Requirements for Recovery
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Conduct of Post Disaster and Needs

Assessment
• Preparation of Reports

ORGANIZATIONS MEO, MASSO, DPWH, PEO, DSWD
RATIONALE Post Disaster Needs Analysis is part of

Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Hinundayan – One (1) AOR

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Conducted Post Disaster Needs Analysis.
INDICATORS
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL Difficulty in Time Coordination of
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Participants

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Damaged Houses
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Rehabilitation of Damaged Houses

(procurement of materials and hiring of
chainsaw operators and other workers
including procurement of fuels).
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Procurement of Materials;

• Hiring of Chainsaw Operators;
• Hiring of Other Workers;
• Procurement of other Supplies.

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MPDO, MSWDO, MDRRMO
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Damaged Houses are part

of Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery
Activities.
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated damaged houses (procured

INDICATORS materials and hired chainsaw operators and
other workers and procured fuels).
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE there is possible insufficiency of LGU funds &
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT manpower & uncertainty of
external funding source.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Damaged Municipal

Buildings
Rehabilitation of Damaged Municipal

BRIEF DESCRIPTION Buildings: Evacuation Centers, Mun. Halls,
Legislative Building, RHU, Public Stage,
Markets, Terminals, MRF, RCA & NCDC
Building.
• Repair of HAPTC Cum Mun. Evacuation

Center
• Repair of Mun. Evacuation Center,
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Biasong (Bldg. I)
• Repair of Mun. Evacuation Center,
Biasong (Bldg. II)
• Repair of Mun. Hall (BLdg. I)
• Repair of Mun. Hall (Bldg. II)
• Repair of Legislative Building
• Repair of RHU Building
• Repair of Public Stage
• Repair of Public Dry Market Stalls
• Repair of Public Wet Market (Bldg. I)
• Repair of Public Wet Market (Bldg. II)
• Repair of Public Wet Market (Bldg. III)
• Repair of Public Terminal Shed
• Repair of Public Terminal Stalls
• Repair of MRF Building
• Repair of RCA Building
• Repair of NCDC Building

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MPDO, MEO, MDRRMO
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Damaged Municipal

Buildings are part of Disaster Rehabilitation
and Recovery Activities.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Constituents of Hinundayan: 12,398

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitation of Damaged Municipal
INDICATORS Buildings:
• HAPTC Mun. Evacuation Center

• Mun. EvacuationCenter, Biasong Building I

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
• Mun. Evacuation Center, Biasong Building

II
• Mun. Hall (Bldg. I)
• Mun. Hall (Bldg. II)
• Legislative Building
• RHU Building
• Public Stage
• Public Dry Market Stalls
• Public Wet Market(Bldg.I)
• Public Wet Market (Bldg. II)
• Public Wet Market(Bldg. III)
• Public Terminal Shed
• Public Terminal Stalls
• MRF Building
• RCA Building
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL Possible Insufficiency of LGU Funds &

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Manpower.
Their full support and positive cooperation in
EXPECTED PRIVATE SECTOR program implementation are highly expected.
RESPONSE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Facilities

BRIEF DESCRIPTION Facilities such as Municipal Plaza and
Municipal Wharf.

PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Facilities:
• Repair of Damaged Municipal Plaza
• Repair of Damaged Municipal Wharf

ORGANIZATIONS M.O, MPDO, MEO, MDRRMO

Facilities are part of Disaster Rehabilitation
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Constituents of Hinundayan: 12, 398

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged Municipal Facilities:
INDICATORS
• Municipal Plaza
• Municipal Wharf
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Possible Insufficiency of LGU Funds &
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT Manpower.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Damaged Watch Towers
Rehabilitation of Damaged Watch Towers

BRIEF DESCRIPTION at Brgy. Ambao, Brgy. Sabang and Brgy.
Sagbok.
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Repair of Damaged Watch Tower at Brgy.

Ambao
• Repair of Damaged Watch Tower at Brgy.
Sabang
• Repair of Damaged Watch Tower at Brgy.
Sagbok

ORGANIZATIONS OMAS, MPDO, MEO, MDRRMO
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Damaged Watch Towers

are part of Disaster Rehabilitation and
Recovery Activities.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES People of the following barangays:

• Ambao - 967
• Sabang - 674
• Sagbok - 907

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged Watch Towers at:
INDICATORS • Brgy. Ambao
• Brgy. Sabang
• Brgy. Sagbok
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL Possible Insufficiency of LGU Funds &

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Manpower.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL

Streetlights

Streetlights at:
BRIEF DESCRIPTION • Brgy. Cat- iwing

• Brgy. Sagbok
• Brgy, Plaridel
• Brgy. Ambao
• Brgy. Amaga
• Brgy. District II
• Brgy. District III
• Brgy. Navalita
• Brgy. Biasong
• Brgy. Hubasan
• Brgy. Cabulisan
• Brgy, Lungsodaan
• Brgy. Sabang
• Brgy. Baculod
• Brgy. An- An
• Brgy. Bugho
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Re – installation of Poles

• Re – installation of Bulbs
• Re – wiring

ORGANIZATIONS
M.O, MPDO, MEO, MDRRMO

Streetlights are part of Disaster
Rehabilitation and Recovery.
Population of the following barangays:

INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Brgy. Cat- iwing - 585
• Brgy. Sagbok - 907
• Brgy, Plaridel - 358
• Brgy. Ambao - 967
• Brgy. Amaga - 281
• Brgy. District I - 626

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
• Brgy. District II - 826

• Brgy. District III - 915
• Brgy. Navalita - 754
• Brgy. Biasong - 753
• Brgy. Hubasan - 578
• Brgy. Cabulisan - 313
• Brgy, Lungsodaan - 1,247
• Brgy. Sabang - 674
• Brgy. Baculod - 1, 191
• Brgy. An- An - 526
• Brgy. Bugho - 897
Total - 12, 398

TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged Municipal Streetlight
INDICATORS at:
• Brgy. Cat- iwing
• Brgy. Sagbok
• Brgy. Plaridel
• Brgy. Ambao
• Brgy. Amaga
• Brgy. Navalita
• Brgy. Biasong
• Brgy. Hubasan
• Brgy. Cabulisan
• Brgy. Lungsodaan
• Brgy. Sabang
• Brgy. Baculod
• Brgy, An- An
• Brgy. Bugho
FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Possible Insufficiency of LGU Funds &
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT Manpower.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Damaged National

Buildings
Repair of PNP Building and BFP Building

BRIEF DESCRIPTION
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Rehabilitation of Damaged National

Building:
• Repair of Damaged PNP Building
• Repair of Damaged BFP Building

ORGANIZATIONS PNP, BFP, MPDO, MEO
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Damaged National

INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • PNP Personnel: 22

• BFP Personnel: 8
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged National Building:

INDICATORS • PNP Building
• BFP Building

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Uncertainty of Funds

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Rehabilitation of Damaged School
Buildings
.
Rehabilitation of all Damaged School
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Buildings in Hinundayan District.
.
• Repair of Damaged Amaga MGES
• Repair of Damaged Ambao MGES
• Repair of Damaged An- An MGES
• Repair of Damaged Baculod ES
• Repair of Damaged Biasong MGES
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S • Repair of Damaged Bugho ES
• Repair of Damaged Cabulisan MGES
• Repair of Damaged Cat -iwing MGES
• Repair of Damaged Hinundayan CS
• Repair of Damaged Hubasan ES
• Repair of Damaged Lungsodaan ES
• Repair of Damaged Navalita MGES
• Repair of Damaged Plaridel MGES
• Repair of Damaged Sagbok ES
• Repair of Damaged LNHS
PROPONENT and PARTNER DepEd, MPDO, MEO, MDRRMO

ORGANIZATIONS
.
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Damaged School

and Recovery.
School Population of the following:

INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Amaga MGES - 43
• Ambao MGES - 82
• An- An MGES - 49
• Baculod ES - 104
• Biasong MGES - 57
• Bugho ES - 116
• Cabulisan MGES - 46
• Cat -iwing MGES - 70
• Hinundayan CS - 346
• Hubasan ES - 92
• Lungsodaan ES - 257
• Navalita MGES - 47
• Plaridel MGES - 45
• Sagbok ES - 129
• LNHS - 1, 405

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged School Buildings:

INDICATORS • Amaga MGES
• Ambao MGES
• An- An MGES
• Baculod ES
• Biasong MGES
• Bugho ES
• Cabulisan MGES
• Cat -iwing MGES
• Hinundayan CS
• Hubasan ES
• Lungsodaan ES
• Navalita MGES
• Plaridel MGES
• Sagbok ES
• LNHS
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL Possible Insufficiency of LGU Funds/ SEF &

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Manpower and Uncertainty of National
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT Budget allocation from DepEd and from
other agencies.

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Damaged Barangay Halls

.
Rehabilitation of Damaged Barangay Halls
BRIEF DESCRIPTION of the Barangays: Amaga, Ambao, An- An,
Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan,
Cat- iwing, District I, District II, District III,
Hubasan, Lungsodaan, Navalita, Plaridel,
Sabang & Sagbok.
.
• Repair of Damaged Brgy. Hall of Brgy.
Amaga
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Ambao
An- An
Baculod
Biasong
Bugho
Cabulisan
Cat- iwing
District I
District II
District III
Hubasan
Lungsodaan
Navalita
Plaridel
Sabang
Sagbok
PROPONENT and PARTNER BLGU, MPDO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Rehabilitation of Damaged Barangay Halls

are part of Disaster Rehabilitation and
Recovery.
People of the following barangays;
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Brgy. Amaga - 281
• Brgy. Baculod - 1,191
• Brgy. Cat- iwing - 585
• Brgy. Lungsodaan - 1,247
• Brgy. Plaridel - 358
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged Barangay Halls at:

INDICATORS • Brgy. Amaga
• Brgy. Ambao
• Brgy. An- An
• Brgy. Baculod
• Brgy. Biasong
• Brgy. Bugho
• Brgy. Cabulisan
• Brgy. Hubasan
• Brgy. Navalita
• Brgy. Plaridel
• Brgy. Sabang
• Brgy. Sagbok
POSSIBLE RISKS/ EXTERNAL Possible Insufficiency of Brgy. Funds &

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Manpower and Uncertainty of External
THE REALIZATION OF THE PROJECT Funding Source.
expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Damaged Brgy. Covered

Courts
BRIEF DESCRIPTION Rehabilitation of Damaged Covered Courts

of the Barangays: Amaga, Ambao, An- An,
Baculod, Biasong, Bugho, Cabulisan,
Cat- iwing, District I, Hubasan, Lungsodaan,
Navalita, Plaridel, Sabang & Sagbok.
• Repair of Damaged Covered Courts of

Brgy. Amaga
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Brgy. Ambao
Brgy. An- An
Brgy. Baculod
Brgy. Biasong
Brgy. Bugho
Brgy. Cabulisan
Brgy. Cat-iwing
Brgy. District I
Brgy. Hubasan
Brgy. Lungsodaan
Brgy. Navalita
Brgy. Plaridel
Brgy. Sabang
Brgy. Sagbok
PROPONENT and PARTNER BLGU, MPDO

ORGANIZATIONS
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Damaged Brgy. Covered

Courts are part of Disaster Rehabilitation
and Recovery.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
People of the following:
• Brgy. Amaga - 281

INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Brgy. Ambao - 967
• Brgy. Baculod - 1,191
• Brgy. Cat-iwing - 585
• Brgy. Lungsodaan - 1,247
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged Brgy. Covered

INDICATORS Courts at:
• Brgy. Amaga
• Brgy. Ambao
• Brgy. An- An
• Brgy. Baculod
• Brgy. Biasong
• Brgy. Bugho
• Brgy. Cabulisan
• Brgy. Hubasan
• Brgy. Navalita
• Brgy. Plaridel
• Brgy. Sabang
• Brgy. Sagbok


expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Damaged Barangay Day

Care Center
Rehabilitation of Damaged Day Care

BRIEF DESCRIPTION Centers of the Barangays: Amaga, Ambao,
An- An, Baculod, Biasong, Bugho,
Cabulisan, Cat- iwing, District I, District II,
District III, Hubasan, Lungsodaan, Navalita,
Plaridel, Sabang & Sagbok.
• Repair of Damaged Brgy. Day Care

Center of Brgy. Amaga
PROGRAM/PROJECT COMPONENT/S Center of Brgy. Ambao
Center of Brgy. An- An
Center of Brgy. Baculod
Center of Brgy. Biasong
Center of Brgy. Bugho
Center of Brgy. Cabulisan
Center of Brgy. Cat- iwing
Center of Brgy. District I
Center of Brgy. District II
Center of Brgy. District III
Center of Brgy. Hubasan
Center of Brgy. Lungsodaan
Center of Brgy. Navalita
Center of Brgy. Plaridel
Center of Brgy. Sabang
Center of Brgy. Sagbok

ORGANIZATIONS BLGU, MPDO
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Damaged Barangay Day

Care Centers are part of Disaster
Rehabilitation and Recovery.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
Day Care Population of the following

barangays:
• Brgy. Amaga - 3
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES • Brgy. An- An - 8
• Brgy. Baculod - 20
• Brgy. Cat- iwing - 12
• Brgy. Lungsodaan - 19
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS Rehabilitated Damaged Brgy. Day Care

INDICATORS Centers at:
• Brgy. Amaga
• Brgy. Ambao
• Brgy. An- An
• Brgy. Baculod
• Brgy. Biasong
• Brgy. Bugho
• Brgy. Cabulisan
• Brgy. Hubasan
• Brgy. Navalita
• Brgy. Plaridel
• Brgy. Sabang
• Brgy. Sagbok

expected.

SUBPROJECT PROPOSAL
NAME OF PROGRAM/PROJECT Rehabilitation of Navalita Dam.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION
Rehabilitation of Navalita Dam,
damaged by previous heavy rains and
by Typhoon Odette
• General Rehabilitation of Navalita Dam.

ORGANIZATIONS OMAS, MEO
RATIONALE Rehabilitation of Navalita Dam is part of

Disaster Rehabilitation and Recovery.
INTENDED BENEFICIARIES
• Farmers of Camungaan: 603
TARGET OUTPUTS/ SUCCESS

INDICATORS Rehabilitated Navalita Dam.

FACTORS THAT COULD FRUSTARATE Difficulty in looking for funding source.

expected.

LEGISLATIVE REQUIREMENTS

CAPDEV REQUIREMENTS
Sector: INSTITUTIONAL SECTOR
Formulation of development policies for the general welfare of the public
Passage of resolutions and enactment of ordinances on development policies
Conduct trainings for SB Members on Local Legislation
Conduct trainings for SB Members on quasi-judicial
Skills training for SB Staff
Designation of CSO Desk Officer
Facilitate CSO for accreditation
Organization of Local Special Bodies (LSB)
Revision and amendments of Local Revenue Tax Code and Local Incentive and
Investment Code
Conduct training on Strategic Performance Management System (SPMS)
Support to barangay programs
Intensify revenue collection
Creation of Local Monitoring Services Committee
Strengthening the Local Monitoring Services Committee through trainings
Conduct orientation, trainings and seminar
Conduct assessment and evaluation of employees performance
Regulate and implements the RSP requirements.
Improve and develop the employees capability
Performance evaluation
Motivate Employees
Rewarding and Recognition
Preparation and Submission of OPCR, DPCR, IPCR and SALN

Install internet-based access to workplace

Promote Systematic Data Management
Sector: INSTITUTIONAL SECTOR

Promote HRM intranet Performance Online Monitoring System (POMS)
Adoptation and Implementation of Database System
Adoptation Human Resource Information System (HRIS)
Implementation of Human Resource Management Information System (HRMIS)
Sector: SOCIAL SECTOR

Formulation and approval of POPS Plan to address peace and security of the
municipality.
Capacitate force multiplier thru skills training and refresher course in applicable penal
laws.
Conduct regular threat and risk assessment to elected government officials and other
VIPs.
Conduct regular security assessment and inspection to vital installation.
Support investigators in capacity develop thru training and formal schooling.
Assigned dedicated investigators
Capacitate MFLET thru training and refresher course in fishery laws and other related
Conduct random drug test to drug surrenderer and government officials and employees.
Sector: ECONOMIC SECTOR

Creation of Regular Plantilla Item Personnel for MTIPO and hire Tourist Guides on
honorarium guides
Conduct training for MTIPO personnel and other support personnel
Seminar on Festival Management

Seminar Workshop on Cultural mapping

Revision of the existing organizational structure
Appointment of permanent Mun. Treasurer
Creation of and appropriation for the Plantilla Position for Licensing Officer I (SG-11)
Appointment of Licensing Officer I
Creation of and appropriation for the Plantilla Position for Property Custodian (SG-8)
Appointment of permanent Property Custodian I
Appropriation and implementation of MTO extension
Allocate funds for trainings
Attend to and participate in enhancement trainings
Outsource contextualized database system for storing
Installation of the contextualized database system for storing
Allocation and appropriation of funds for collectors incentive
Procurement of statistical software
Review existing vision, mission and core values
Conduct consultative meeting among MTO staff for the vision, mission and core
values
Sector: ENVIRONMENTAL SECTOR

Creation of Regular Plantilla Item Personnel for MENRO Officer and hire 2 MENRO
support staffs
Conduct Training on Forest Law Enforcement, Solid Waste Management & other
Environmental Protection & Management to MENRO personnel & staff and other
support personnel

MONITORING AND EVALUATION STRATEGY
M&E Strategy
DATA SOURCE TO
ASSESS
PERFORMANCE
(INDIVIDIAL
RESULTS PERFORMANCE TARGETS FOR BENEFICIARIES, COLLECTION FREQUENCY RESPONSIBILITY CENTER
INDICATORS INDICATORS GROUPS OF METHODS
BENEFICIARIES,
ORGANIZATIONS,
PARTNERS,
DOCUMENTS,
ETC.)
Goal/Impact
(Long term)
Reduction Increased capacity CDRA Survey; Annual document Every year and CDP Monitoring Team
and and reduced review and at the end of
Management vulnerability of the workshop six years
of Disaster 17 component Update CDRA;
Risks barangays
Annual
Construction of accomplishment
Climate review and sites
Resilient / Flood inspection
Control
Drainage
System at
Brgys. District I
and District II.
Annual
Climate review and sites
Resilient / Flood inspection
Control
Drainage
System at Brgy.
District III.
Construction of Annual
Climate accomplishment
Resilient / Flood review and sites
Control inspection
Drainage
System at Brgy.
Lungsodaan.
Construction of
Creek and Annual
accomplishment

Riverbank review and sites

Protection; inspection
Seawall; accomplishment
review and sites
inspection
Concrete accomplishment
Irrigation Canal review and sites
at Camunga-an. inspection
Annual Tree
Growing; Annual
accomplishment
review
Declogging of
Canals and Annual
Creeks; accomplishment
review
Construction of
Flood Control Annual
Drainage Canal accomplishment
at LNHS; review and sites
inspection
Construction of
Flood Control Annual
Drainage Canal accomplishment
at HCS; review and sites
inspection
Procurement of
Lots for Annual
Additional accomplishment
Evacuation review and sites
Centers. inspection
Construction of
Mun. Standard Annual
Evacuation accomplishment
Center at Brgy. review and sites
Baculod. inspection
Construction of
Bugho. inspection
Construction of
Sagbok inspection

Mun. Standard accomplishment
Center at Brgy. inspection
Hubasan
An- An
Cat- iwing
Ambao
Center with inspection
Storage Facility
Continuing Annual
Concrete review and sites
Irrigation Canals inspection
Procurement Annual
and Installation accomplishment
of Machine for review and sites
Eco- Friendly inspection
Ultra High
Thermal
Decomposition
System
DRRM Human Annual

Resource accomplishment
Development review and
planning
ELDRRM workshop
Planning Annual
Workshop and accomplishment
CBDRRM review and
Planning planning
Workshop workshop

Basic Incident Annual

Command accomplishment
System (BICS) review and
Training planning
workshop
Emergency Annual
Operation accomplishment
(EOC) Training review and
planning
workshop
Standard First Annual
Aid (SFA), Basic accomplishment
Life Support review and
(BLS) and Fire planning
Suppression workshop
(FS) Training for
BERTS
Radio
Communication Annual
Training accomplishment
review and
Emergency planning
Medical workshop
Responders
Training – Level
II
Basic Incident
Command Annual
System (BICS) accomplishment
Training review and
planning
Contingency workshop
Planning
Disaster Data
and Information Annual
Management accomplishment
Training review and
planning
Camp workshop
Coordination Annual
and Center accomplishment
Management review and
(CCCM) planning
Training workshop
Rapid and
Damage & Annual
Needs Analysis accomplishment
(RDANA) review and
Training planning
workshop

Flood and Swift Annual

Water Rescue accomplishment
Training review and
planning
Post Disaster workshop
Needs
Assessment
(PDANA)
Training
Public Service Annual

Continuity accomplishment
Planning review and
Rehabilitation planning
and Recovery workshop
Planning
Warehouse, Annual
Financial, accomplishment
Supply Chain, review and
Inventory and planning
Relief Goods workshop
Management
Training
Operation Annual
LISTO Training accomplishment
review and
planning
Logistics workshop
Management
Training
Annual
Management of accomplishment
the Dead and review and
Missing Training planning
Course workshop
Search and Annual

Rescue (SAR) accomplishment
Training review and
planning
Water Search workshop
and Rescue
(WASAR)
Training
High Angle Annual

Search and accomplishment
Rescue review and
Operation planning
Training workshop
Mountain Annual
Search and accomplishment

Rescue review and

(MOSAR) planning
Training workshop
Standard First Annual

Aid (SFA), Basic accomplishment
Life Support review and
(BLS) and Fire planning
Suppression workshop
(FS) Training for
the Community
Standard First
Aid (SFA), Basic
Life Support Annual
(BLS) and Fire accomplishment
Suppression review and
(FS) Training for planning
the Vulnerable workshop
Sectors
Standard First
Aid (SFA), Basic
Life Support
(BLS) and Fire
Suppression Annual
(FS) Training for accomplishment
School DRRM review and
Coordinators planning
workshop
Standard First
Aid (SFA), Basic
Life Support
(BLS) and Fire
Suppression
(FS) Training for
the Youth (SK) Annual
Orientation accomplishment
Forum for the review and
Regular planning
Conduct of workshop
Community
Disaster
Simulation Drills
Minimum Initial
Service
Package (MISP)
for Sexual and
Reproductive
Health Training
Water and
Sanitation for
Health (WASH) Annual
Training accomplishment

review and
Orientation planning
Forum for the workshop
Regular
Conduct of
Community
Disaster Annual
Simulation Drills accomplishment
review and
Minimum Initial planning
Service workshop
Package (MISP) Annual
for Sexual and accomplishment
Reproductive review and
Health Training planning
workshop
Water and
Sanitation for
Health (WASH)
Training
Annual
Nutrition in accomplishment
Emergencies review and
Training planning
workshop
Mental Health
and
Psychosocial
Support Annual
(MHPSS) accomplishment
Training review and
planning
ELDRRM workshop
Planning Annual document
Workshop review and
(2025-2028) workshop
Procurement of
Stockpiling
Procurement of
Radio Tower,
Base &
Handheld
Radios for the
Establishment of
Radio
Communication
System
Procurement of
Communication
Equipments for
OPCEN IECs
Annual
accomplishment

Procurement & review and

Installation of planning
Early Warning workshop
Markers,
Devices &
Signages
Procurement &
Installation of
Siren
Procurement of
Satellite Phone
& VSAT Annual
accomplishment
Procurement of review and
DRRM Tools planning
workshop
Procurement of
Two (2) Units
Motorcycles Annual
accomplishment
Procurement/ review and
Fabrication of planning
Two (2) Units workshop
Motorized Boats
Procurement of
one (1) unit
Drone
Procurement of
Generator
Procurement of Annual
two (2) units accomplishment
Mass Transport review and
Truck planning
workshop
Procurement of Annual
two (2) units accomplishment
Mini – Dump review and
Truck planning
workshop
Procurement of
One (1) unit
Manlift Annual
Equipment accomplishment
review and
Procurement of planning
One (1) Unit workshop
Crawler Type
Backhoe

Immediate
General
Clearing
Operations
Maintenance of
Peace and
Order
Search, Rescue,
Retrieval and
Fire
Suppression
Health and
Sanitation
Annual
Rapid Damage accomplishment
Assessment and review and
Needs Analysis planning
workshop
Relief
Operations
Immediate
Continuity of Annual
Education accomplishment
review and
Post Disaster planning
Needs Analysis workshop
Rehabilitation of
Damaged
Municipal
Facilities
Rehabilitation of
Damaged Watch
Towers
Rehabilitation of
Damaged
Municipal
Streetlights Annual
accomplishment
Rehabilitation of review and sites
Damaged inspection
National
Buildings
Rehabilitation of
Damaged
School Buildings Annual
accomplishment
review and sites
inspection

Rehabilitation of
Damaged Annual
Barangay Halls accomplishment
review and sites
Rehabilitation of inspection
Damaged Brgy.
Covered Courts Annual
accomplishment
Damaged inspection
Barangay Day
Care Center Annual
accomplishment
Navalita Dam. inspection
Annual
accomplishment
review and sites
inspection
Annual
accomplishment
review and sites
inspection
Annual
accomplishment
review and sites
inspection
Objective/
Outcome
(Medium
term)
Outputs/
Deliverables/
Products and
Services
delivered
(Short term)
Activities
(Ongoing)
Inputs
(Ongoing)

CHAPTER IV
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM

ANNEX A
Integrated Planning Process with Local Special Bodies and Advisory Councils
A. Stage One: Establishing and Populating the Planning Database
1. Convene the Local Development Council (LDC) to design and collectively agree on
the local planning database.
2. Prepare the database utilizing, but not limited to, the following data sources, manuals
and guides:
a. Rationalized Planning Indicator and Data Set (RaPIDS) – DILG

b. Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) – DILG
c. Local Governance Performance Management System (LGPMS) – DILG
d. Electronic Statement of Receipts and Expenditures (eSRE) – BLGF-DOF
e. Local Government Financial Performance Monitoring System (LGFPMS) –
BLGF-DOF
f. LGU Fiscal Sustainability Scorecard – BLGF-DOF
g. Public Financial Management Assessment Tool (PFMAT) – DBM
h. Public Financial Management Assessment Tool Improvement Plan (PFMAT
IP) – DBM
i. Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan (PDPFP) – Province and
NEDA
j. Comprehensive Land Use Plan/Existing Land Use Map
k. Base, Hazard and Other Maps – Province, DILG, NAMRIA, etc.
3. Assign key members, divisions and offices in the LGU as members of the planning
team to undertake the responsibility for populating and maintaining the database.
4. Disseminate the data to the Provincial Planning and Development Office (PPDO) and
to Local Special Bodies, Local Advisory Councils and Sectoral or Functional
Committees.
B. Stage Two: Preparing the Draft Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)
1. Based on the Planning Database, prepare the Situational Analysis and Ecological
Profile utilizing the format prescribed in DILG issuances and guidelines for the
preparation of the CDP (CDP Guidebook, CDP Illustrative Guide, etc.)
2. Based on the Ecological Profile, identify the development targets, timeframes, and
measurable outcomes.
3. Base development targets, timeframes, and measurable outcomes, identify the

necessary project and programs required to achieve these objectives – Structured List
of PPAs.

4. Prioritize the projects and programs utilizing the prioritization tools and Goal
Achievement Matrix (GAM) as prescribed in DILG issuances and guidelines for the
preparation of the CDP (CDP Guidebook, CDP Illustrative Guide, etc.).
5. Draft the CDP including the implementation instruments [Legislative Requirements,

Capacity Development Program, Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) and
Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy] utilizing the prescribed format in DILG issuances
and guidelines for the preparation of the CDP (CDP Guidebook, CDP Illustrative
Guide, etc.).
6. Disseminate copies of the CDP to Local Special Bodies, Local Advisory Councils and
Sectoral or Functional Committees.
C. Stage Three: Preparation of the Plans of Local Advisory Councils and Sectoral or
Functional Committees for the Implementation of National Government Programs
at the LGU level
1. The Local Advisory Councils and Sectoral or Functional Committees, especially for
the implementation of national government programs at the LGU level, develops a
long list of projects based on the CDP of the LGU as well as other relevant policies
and consultations with their members.
2. The members of the Local Advisory Councils and Sectoral or Functional Committees
agree on the prioritization criteria and votes on projects to be included in their annual
plan.
3. The Local Advisory Councils and Sectoral or Functional Committees prepare a draft
plan and disseminate this to the LDC and the Provincial Development Council (PDC).
D. Stage Four: Integration and Harmonization of Local Plans
1. The LDC convenes the expanded LDC which would include representation from the
Local Advisory Councils and Sectoral or Functional Committees especially for the
implementation of national government programs at the LGU level, and the PDC.
2. Through consultation, the long list of projects from these plans including the coming
year priority projects for the years are integrated into the final harmonized version of
the LDIP. The process should allow for the identification of areas of project duplication
as well as were economies of scale and/or synergy can be achieved by combining
projects. In the latter case, the project can be implemented by the next higher level of
LGU (e.g. province) consequently freeing up the resource for other projects.
3. The Annual Investment Program (AIP), as a slice of the LDIP, will now also contain all
projects including those funded through national government programs.
4. The LDC prepares the Annual Budget based on the AIP.
5. The results will feedback to the long-list and short-list of projects of the Local Advisory
Councils and Sectoral or Functional Committees for the purpose of possible revision.

E. Stage Five: Plan Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation
1. The Local Development Indicator System (LDIS) will be utilized to develop measures
to monitor the implementation and outcomes of projects. Since plans and projects
were based on these data, tracking of their benefits will be more objective and
measureable. This should find its way in the Monitoring and Evaluation Strategy of the
CDP.
2. The LDC will meet regularly to review the reports of the different monitoring groups.
ANNEX B (Form 1a)

EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 01

Series of 2015
CREATING AND MOBILIZING THE MUNICIPAL PLANNING TEAM (MPT) FOR THE
PREPARATION OF THE MUNICIPAL COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN (CLUP) AND
COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (CDP), DESIGNATING ITS COMPOSITION,
ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES
WHEREAS, the Local Government Code or RA 7160 mandates local government units
to prepare a Comprehensive Development Plan that outlines the key goals and objectives,
challenges and concerns facing LGU’s and a set of programs, projects and policies to attain its
vision and mission towards a sustained socio-economic development;
WHEREAS, RA 7160 and Executive Order No. 72 Series of 1993, provides that local
government units (LGUs) shall, in conformity with existing laws, continue to prepare their
respective comprehensive land use plans enacted through zoning ordinances which shall be the
primary and dominant bases for the future use of land resources;
WHEREAS, RA 7160 further provides that the Local Development Council (LDC) is the
body mandated by the Local Government Code of 1991 (LGC) to prepare the multi – sectoral
development plan of a local government unit (LGU) thus it is critical to ensure that the LDC as
well as its functional and sectoral committees, as providers of technical support and assistance
are constituted and activated including the technical working group for that purpose;
NOW THEREFORE, I, FROILAN NAGAÑO JR., Mayor of the Municipality of San

Leonardo, Province of Nueva Ecija, by virtue of the powers vested in me by law, do hereby
create and mobilize the MUNICIPAL PLANNING TEAM (MPT), to wit:
Section 1. COMPOSITION
The MPT shall be composed of the following:
1.1. Planning Core Group
a) MPDC: _____________________
b) Planning Officer: _______________
c) Urban Planner: Ms. ISHTAR PADAO
d) GIS Expert: Mr. FRANCIS PIZZARA

e) MLGOO: LGOO V KATHERINE LAPUZ

f) MDRRMO: ___________________
g) MENRO: __________________
h) LnB President: ___________________
1.2. Support Group
a) Technical Staff: ________________

b) SB Rep on Housing: _____________
c) SB Rep on Zoning/Land Use: _________________
d) DepEd Dist. Supervisor: ________________
e) MHO: __________________
f) MSWDO: __________________
g) PNP Chief/Rep: __________________
h) Youth Rep.: _________________
i) Real Estate Developer/Rep: ________________
j) Municipal Treasurer
k) Municipal Budget Officer
1.3. Technical Working Group (per sector)
a) Social Sector
a.1.) Community Leaders/Rep: __________________
a.2.) Concerned NGA: __________________
a.3.) LnB Rep: _________________
a.4.) Senior Citizen Rep: ______________
a.5.) SB Rep: ______________
a.6.) GAD Focal Person: _______________
b) Economic
b.1.) MAO: __________________
b.2.) MARO: ___________________
b.3.) Tourism Officer: ________________
b.4.) Trade and Industry Officer: ___________
b.5.) TESDA/PESO Rep: __________________
b.6.) Business Sector Rep: ______________

c) Infrastructure
c.1.) LUWA Rep: ____________
c.2.) Electric Coop Rep: _____________
c.3.) TeleCom Rep: _______________
c.4.) Irrigators Association Rep. ______________
c.5.) PNP Rep. ______________
d) Physical
d.1.) Academe: ______________
d.2.) Assessor: _________________
d.3.) Real Estate Rep: ____________
d.4.) PPDO Rep: ____________
e) CCA/DRR
e.1.) Academe: ________________
e.2.) LnB Rep: _________________
e.3.) DENR Rep: _______________
f) GG Urbanism
f.1.) Architect: ______________
Section 2. ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES
Section 2.1. Municipal Planning Team (MPT)
The MPT shall be the Over-all committee responsible for coordinating all technical and
administrative activities in the preparation of the CLUP, including stakeholder consultations and
meetings; it shall also facilitate the presentation of the draft CLUP/CDP to the LDC for
endorsement to the SB.
Section 2.2. Planning Core Group (PCG)

The PCG will coordinate the planning activities, draft and consolidate the contents of the
CLUP and CDP documents.
Section 2.3. Planning Support Group (PSG)
The PSG shall provide basic information and appropriate administrative support to the
planning core group, their Department being the main source of data and information and
needed resources for profiling and target setting.
Section 2.4. Planning Technical Working Group (PTWG)
The PTWG on the other hand will assist the Planning Core Group for their particular
sector in the following:
● Conduct of sectoral/intersectoral analysis, validation and reports

● Conduct of surveys, consultations/ meetings, workshops
● Integration/ finalization of studies, research findings, and consultation/survey
outputs
Section 3. RELATIONSHIP WITH THE MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
The MPT shall act as the main technical component of the Municipal Development
Council and shall work closely thru regular updates and reports with the MDC in crafting the
CLUP and the CDP.
Section 4. SUPPORT REQUIREMENTS
The MPT may call upon the assistance of relevant units and/or LGU personnel, through
the respective department heads, in the implementation of various activities relative to the
formulation of the CDP and CLUP.
Moreover, everyone is enjoined to participate in the various activities of the Municipal

planning Team when requested.

Section 5. EFFECTIVITY
The MPT shall exercise their duties and functions effective immediately.
Done this 6th Day of April, 2015.
FROILAN NAGAÑO, JR.

Mayor

ANNEX B (Form 1b)

Workplan for the Preparation of the CDP
WEEKS
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3
ACTIVITIES / TASKS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
A. MOBILIZATION
1. Orientation, organization
and tasking
2. Preliminary Assessments
B. COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
1. Vision Setting
2. Goal Formulation
3. Social Development Plan
4. Economic Development
Plan
5. Environmental Management
Plan
6. Infrastructure and Physical
Development Plan
7. Institutional Development
Plan
8. Local Development
Investment Programming
and Implementation
Instruments
9. Public Consultation :
Presentation of the CDP
C. FINALIZATION OF PLANS
1. Finalize CDP
2. Finalize LDIP
D. PLAN ADOPTION AND
APPROVAL
1. Submission to LDC for
Endorsement to Local
Sanggunian
2. CDP and LDIP Approval by

the Sanggunian
3. Submission of CDP

Sample Harmonized Workplan for the Preparation of the CLUP and CDP*
WEEKS
MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4
MONTH
ACTIVITIES / TASKS 5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
A. MOBILIZATION
3. Orientation, organization and tasking
4. Preliminary Assessments
B. CHARACTERIZATION AND ANALYSIS
1. Module 1 Seminar workshop
2. Data collection, review and validation
3. Maps and graphics preparation
4. Inter- and intra- area analysis
a. Population, Settlements and Social
Services
b. Area Economy
c. Infrastructure
d. Land Use and Environment
e. Institutional Capability
5. Module 2 Seminar - Workshop
6. Cross-sectoral integration
a. Summary of LGU potentials and
problems
6. Public consultation No. 1
C. COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLANNING
10. Vision Setting
11. Goal Formulation
12. Alternative Strategies Generation
13. Evaluation of Alternative Spatial
Strategies

WEEKS
ACTIVITIES / TASKS MONTH 1 MONTH 2 MONTH 3 MONTH 4 MONTH

5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
14. Public Consultation No. 2: Selection of
Preferred Spatial Strategy
15. Detailing the Preferred Spatial Strategy
16. Preparation of the CLUP
17. Drafting of the Zoning Ordinance
18. Public Consultation No. 3: Presentation of
the CLUP and Zoning Ordinance
D. MEDIUM-TERM COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLANNING
1. Social Development Plan
2. Economic Development Plan
3. Environmental Management Plan
4. Infrastructure and Physical Development
Plan
5. Institutional Development Plan
6. Local Development Investment
Programming and Implementation
Instruments
7. Public Consultation No. 4: Presentation of
the CDP
E. FINALIZATION OF PLANS
1. Finalize CLUP
2. Finalize Zoning Ordinance
3. Finalize CDP
4. Finalize LDIP
F. PLAN ADOPTION AND APPROVAL
1. Submission to LDC for Endorsement to
Local Sanggunian
2. CDP and LDIP Approval by the Sanggunian
3. Submission of the CLUP to the Provincial
Land Use Committee for Review
4. Approval of the CLUP by the PLUC

ANNEX B (Form 1c)

Ecological Profile
LGU Vision & Mission:

(Please ensure that the vision is compliant with recent statutes such as CCA/DRR and gender
sensitivity. You may also include in this part the presentation of the success indicators per vision
element descriptor.)
I. History
(The LGU may include a brief history of the city or municipality to highlight the unique
characteristics and significance of the locality in relation to the country or to its specific region.)
II. Profile, Analysis, and Development Goals:

(Part I will mainly be composed of the presentation of the data into graphs and tables per sector
and the results of the analysis of the data gathered as presented in the Local Development
Indicator Table or Matrix (Form 1d). Analysis should include the vision reality gap result and
problem solution finding matrix (PSFM) per sector. Using the PSFM, policy options and sectoral
goals maybe derived. Please present the information per development sector.)
A. Social
B. Economic
C. Environmental
D. Physical/Infrastructure
E. Institutional

ANNEX B (Form 1d)

Local Development Indicator Table
SMALLER SPATIAL
INDICATOR OF LARGER
SECTOR / PLANNING UNITS OF PLANNING
CORE CONCERNS DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL
SUB-SECTOR AREA AREA
UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT
1 2 3 ...n
1. SOCIAL
Demography Population Size • Population size (all census
years available including
latest)
Population Growth • Growth rate, urban and rural,
Rate short-term medium term,
long term (formula used)
Population • Gross population density, 2
Distribution reference years
• Net population density, 2
reference years
• Percent of urban population,
2 reference years
• Urban population density, 2
reference years
Level of Well- Access to education • Proportion of 6-12 year old
Being children who are not in
elementary school, by sex,
latest
• Proportion of 13-16 year olds
who are not in secondary
school, by sex, latest
Access to health • Percent of households
services without sanitary toilets, latest
• Proportion of children 0-5
years old who are below
normal weight for their age

• Proportion of children under

5 years old who died of
illness, 2 reference years
• Proportion of women who
died due to pregnancy, 2
reference years
• Proportion of 2 births
attended by skilled health
personnel to total deliveries,
latest
• Prevalence rates of
HIV/AIDS, malaria,
tuberculosis, and other
diseases, latest
• Death rates of HIV/AIDS,
malaria, tuberculosis and
other diseases latest
Social Justice Poverty • Proportion of households
whose members eat less
than 3 full meals a day, 2
reference years
• Proportion of population with
incomes below poverty line
(consult data for region)
Security • Proportion of households
who are informal settlers, 2
reference years
• Proportion of households
with dwelling structures
unable to protect them from
the elements, 2 reference
years (focus on roofing and
outer walls)
with members victimized by

crime to total households, 2

reference years
without access to level II and
level III water supply system,
2 reference years
Gender Equality • Ratio of girls to boys in
elementary, secondary and
tertiary school, latest
• Share of women in non-
agricultural wage
employment
2. ECONOMIC
General Labor and • Percent labor force employed
employment by sex, 2 reference years
• Dependency ratio, 2
reference years (youth and
old age)
• Percent of workers in non-
agricultural occupation, 2
reference years
• Proportion of persons 15
years old and above who are
not working but actively
seeking work
• Proportion of children below
15 years old who are
employed to the total number
of employed persons
Agriculture Agricultural • Volume/value of agricultural
Production crop production by major
crop, 2 reference years
• Volume/value of fish
production inland & marine, 2
reference years

• Fishing HH/Total HH
Food self-sufficiency • Food self-sufficiency index
by food groups, latest
Forestry •
Per capita value of
production
• Employment contribution of
forestry in percent of total
employment
Fishery • Per capita fish consumption
(m.t./year)
• Ratio of commercial fishing
production versus municipal
fishing production
Industry • Ratio of electrical energy
consumption in industry &
commerce to total
consumption
• Volume/value or
mining/quarrying production,
2 reference years
Industry and Household Income • Percentage of households
Services with secondary/ tertiary
source of income
• Percentage of households
engaged in main source of
income only to total number
of households
Services • Total number of commercial
establishments, in EEU, 2
reference years
• Tourism receipts per year
3. ENVIRONMENT AND NATURAL RESOURCES

Forest Resource Base and • Change in stock of forestry

Ecosystem Land Use resources: dipterocarp, tree
plantation, mangroves, pine,
rattan (ha/year)
• Soil erosion in upland areas
(mm/year)
• Forest land classification
ratios (in %)
• Ratio of population to
certified A&D areas (in
percent)
• Percentage of timberland
proclaimed as forest reserve
Tenure • Area covered by leases and
Arrangement permits per lessee/permittee
Tenure • Area covered by CBFMA as

Arrangement percent of total forest area
• Number of families
benefitting from community-
based projects as percent of
total number of families
• Growth rate of upland
population (per annum)
Lowland/ Land Use and Land • Extent of area devoted to
Agricultural Productivity agriculture in percent of A&D
Ecosystem • Land Use changes (ha/year)
• Land productivity (m.t./ha)
• Ratio of upland devoted to
agriculture over total upland
area (in percent)
• Areas under IPM relative to
total cropland (in percent)
Other Agricultural • Cropland per agricultural
Areas worker (ha)

• Extent of agricultural area

under mechanized cultivation
(in %)
• Ratio of agricultural workers
to the number of
harvesters/threshers
servicing the area
• Extent of irrigable, irrigated,
rainfed, non-irrigated and
prime lands converted to
non-agricultural uses
(ha/year)
Soil degradation • Extent of problem soils
(hectarage) as percent of
total land area
• Erosion rates by land use
(mm/year)
• Area distribution of
erosion/degradation classes
as percent of total land area
• Extent of soil conservation
(area coverage) as percent
of eroded/degraded soils
Fertilizer and • Nitrogen use per unit of
Pesticides Use agricultural output (kg/m.t.)
• Pesticide use per unit of
agricultural output (kg/m.t.)
• Inorganic fertilizer used per
unit area (kg/ha)
Fertilizer and • Organic fertilizer used per
Pesticides Use unit area (kg/ha)
• Ratio of organic to inorganic
fertilizer used
Tenure • Area by tenure of farm per
household, 2 reference years

Urban Air Quality • Concentration of air

Ecosystem pollutants at selected sites:
number of violations of
standards in a year per site
• Incidence in a year per site
per 1000 inhabitants
• Emission levels of different
pollutants per source
Solid Waste • Solid waste per capita in m.t.
Management or cu.m.
• Non-biodegradable waste
per capita (m.t. or cu,m.)
Water Quality • Waste generated per capita
per year (in m.t. or cu.m.)
• Effluents by source (various
units)
• Concentration of water
pollutants in selected water
bodies (various units)
Land Use • Informal settler density
(informal settlers/total
population)
• % of total land area occupied
by squatters
• Rate of change in industrial
land use (ha/year)
Coastal Marine Resource Base • Mangrove area: annual rate
Ecosystem of depletion (ha/year)
• Seagrass beds: number of
species, 2 reference year
• Seagrass beds: status or
condition, 2 reference year
• Coral reef and coral cover:
status or condition, 2
reference years

• Area of fishing ground

relative to fishing population
(ha/1,000 population)
Resource Base • Marine protected areas as
percent of total area of
municipal waters
• Presence of indicator fish
species, 2 reference years
Threats • Concentration of key
pollutants in selected sites, 2
reference years
• Concentration of coliform in
selected beaches (in ppm)
• Oil spills: number and
magnitude
• Rate of sedimentation on
selected bays (mm/year)
Freshwater Surface and Ground • Physical quality indicators, 2
Ecosystem Water Quality reference years
• Chemical quality indicators, 2
reference years
• Biological quality indicators,
2 reference years
• Nitrate content of selected
rivers, 2 reference years
Quality of Major • Rating of the general
Freshwater Bodies condition of freshwater body,
latest
• Number of licensed
abstractors and volume of
abstraction in mcm per
annum
• Area of fishpens as percent
of area of freshwater bodies

Critical
resources
Minerals and • Ratio of mining incidents and

Mines accidents to total no. of
mining industry workers
• Incidence of illness due to
mining operations per year
• Hectarage disturbed by
mining as percent of total
mineralized areas
• Estimates of mineral
deposits, by type of minerals
in metric tons
Biodiversity Ecosystem Diversity • Proportion of ecosystem area
highly threatened species
over total number of known
species
Ecosystem Diversity • Number of sites identified for
migratory birds per 100
hectares
• Number of exotic species
introduced over total number
of species
• Species diversity index
Conservation Efforts • Proportion of protected areas
with illegal settlements to
total protected areas
• Level of ex situ conservation
in percent
• Critical habitat/areas restored
in ha/year
• Number of conservation
programs implemented per
five years

• Habitat size
restored/rehabilitated per
year
• Number of visitors in
protected areas per year
• Percent of protected areas
converted to other uses
• Number of households per
square km. of protected area
4. INFRASTRUCTURE
Social Support Utilities • Percent of HH served by
electric power
• Ratio of HH served by piped
water supply to total urban
HH
Health • No. of hospital beds per 1000
population
Education • Classroom-to-pupil ratio in
elementary schools; in
secondary schools
Telecommunications • No. of telephones/1000
urban HH
• Ratio of postal employees to
total HH population
Economic Public Roads • Road density (area covered
Support by roads to total land area)
Public Roads • Total length of roads in
km/total land area of A&D
land
• Kilometer of road per 100
population
• Density of farm to market
roads (km/100 ha of
farmland)

• Percent of permanent
bridges
Administrative Office Space • Total office floor space per
Support municipal employee (in sq.
m)
Public Safety • No. of fire trucks per capita
• No. of police outposts/1000
households
• No. of prisoners/detention
cell
Municipal Cemetery • Percent occupancy of
municipal cemetery
Open Space • Total area of public open
space per 1000 inhabitants
• Total number of covered
courts/number of barangays
5. INSTITUTIONAL
Local Fiscal Revenue • Total revenue per capita, 2
Management Performance reference yrs
• Self-reliance index, 2
reference years
• Proportion of delinquencies
to total RPT collected, 2
reference years
• Proportion of delinquent RPT
payers to total listed
taxpayers
• Ratio of proceeds from
special levies to total
revenues, 2 reference years
in previous and present
administrations
• Ratio of financial grants or
donations to total LGU
income, 2 reference years in


administrations
Expenditure • Total public expenditure on
capital outlay per capita, 2
reference years
• Ratio of municipal
government employees to
total no. of local taxpayers
RPT • No. of big taxpayers who
account for 80% of tax
revenues
• Total revenue collected as
percent of annual collection
target, 2 reference years
• Percent RPT collected to
total potentially collectible
• Amount of tax arrears
recovered over total tax
arrears at the beginning of
budget year
Municipal • Proportion of receipts from
Enterprises municipal enterprises to total
local revenues
Organization • Proportion of vacancies to
and total plantilla positions,
Management previous and present
administrations
• Ratio of casual employees,
administrations
• Ratio of employees to total
no. of personnel by type, 2
reference years
• Managerial
• Technical

• Administrative
• Ratio of confidential positions
to total plantilla positions,
administrations
Public • Ratio of LDC member NGOs
Participation and POs per capita, previous
and present administrations
Development Legislative Output • Proportion of “development”
Administration legislation to total
sanggunian output, last and
current administrations
Credit Financing • Total public debt incurred by
the LGU per capita, past and
present administrations

ANNEX B (Form 2a)

Sectoral Goal: To raise average income of farming households
Strategy 1: Enhance farm-based income
NO. PROGRAM PROGRAM ACTIONS/INTERVENTIONS

COMPONENTS
1.0 Increased farm 1.1 Intensify 1.1.1 Develop gravity irrigation

yield production support 1.1.2 Install communal pump
services irrigation
1.1.3 Increase water yield of
aquifer
1.1.4 Promote use of certified
seed
1.2 Improve post 1.2.1 Construct mechanical

harvest facility dryers
1.2.2 Regulate use of streets as
solar dryers
1.2.3 Put up storage facilities
1.2.4 Encourage investments in
processing plants
2.0 Better prices of 2.1 Competitive 2.1.1 Encourage competition

farm produce pricing by traders 2.1.2 Regulate prices
2.1.3 Improve market
infrastructure
2.2 Improve post 2.2.1 Install internet-based

harvest facility access to commodities
market
2.2.2 Promote organization of
coops
3.0 Agricultural 3.1 Farming system 3.1.1 Land suitability analysis

product research 3.1.2 Pilot-test livestock & crop
diversification raising (silvi-pasture)
3.1.3 Encourage utilization of
idle lands through imposition
of idle land tax
3.2 Product research 3.2.1 Utilize results of DOST

& development studies

3.2.2 Hold agricultural &

industrial fairs & exhibits
4.0 Alternative 4.1 Raise awareness 4.1.1 Offer short courses on

livelihood levels entrepreneurship
services 4.1.2 Conduct skills training on
non-farm trades & crafts
4.1.3 Adult literacy program
4.2 Attract investors 4.2.1 Offer tax breaks

in the area 4.2.2 Improve transport and
communication facilities
4.2.3 Ensure peace and order
4.2.4 Maintain cleanliness &
livability of the environment
4.3 Foreign 4.3.1 Create PESO

placement 4.3.2 Information exchange re:
assistance Job Orders
4.3.3 Establish linkages with
employment agencies
4.4 Facilitation of 4.4.1 Crackdown on illegal

processing recruiters
4.4.2 Offer financial assistance
4.4.3 Public forum re:
Experiences of Returning
OFWs
* - LGU may choose to present a combined template of Forms 1b and Form 2a as illustrated in
Form 2b.

ANNEX B (Form 2b)

ANNEX B (Form 3a)

Ranked List of Proposed Projects for Investment Programming
PROPOSED COST ESTIMATE PERIOD OF

PROJECT/FILE IMPLEMENTATION
RANK LOCATION / SECTOR
NO.
Individual Cumulativ From To
e
10

ANNEX B (Form 3b)
Project Brief for Each PPA
Box 5
CONTENTS OF PROJECT BRIEF
(With Guide Questions)
1. Name and Type of Project
• What is the working name of the project? It must be brief and catchy
• Short description must be added. How would it be described in 2 – 3 sentences?
• Project proponent or originator of idea
• In what category does it fall?
o Infrastructure & other physical capital?
o Public and private institutions?
o Social, local economic development, environmental management?
o Other?
• Where is the proposed location of the project?
• Are the project’s demands on the natural resources assured of being met for the life
of the project?
• Would the project be at any risk from environmental or human-made hazards?
• Are the project’s demands on the natural resources assured of being met for the life
of the project?
2. Activity Components
• State indicative duration of each component. What places, activities, and groups in
the same area are targeted by the project?
• List the things that need to be done to produce the desired output
o Is a formal feasibility/ design study required?
• Who would manage implementation?
• What complementary measures are needed to ensure project success or reinforce
the intended effects?
• Who would manage implementation?
3. Estimated Cost of Resource Inputs - What amount of implementation funding is
required?
Classified into human power, materials, equipment, etc. by activity component, where
applicable and in pesos if possible)
• Materials ______________
• Human Resources (Labor) ______________
• Equipment ______________
• Etc. ______________
TOTAL Php ______________
• What is the likely funding source?
• Is the project expected to be financially self-sustaining?
4. Justification of the Project
• Rationale / objective derived from the CLUP/ CDP
• Indicate the issue being addressed as identified in the plan
• What indicators of development does the proposed project address?
• On what other places is the project likely to have an effect, and how?

• What social and economic activities in what locations are likely to be affected by the
project, and how?
• In what way, if any, is the proposed project related to other planned or on-going area
development activities?
5. Target Beneficiaries
• Population Sectors or geographical areas
• Specify how men and women or specific areas will be benefited
6. Target Outputs or Success Indicators
• Quantify if possible
• Include indicator of success and means of verification
• What complementary measures are needed to ensure project success or reinforce
the intended effects?
• Will the project lower transaction cost?
• Will the project reduce barriers to participation?
• Will the project increase local area employment?
• Will the project increase income multiplication?
• What will be the public revenue and expenditure impacts of the project?
• Is the project meant to improve area socio-economic performance in any other ways?
7. Possible Risks or External Factors that Could Frustrate the Realization of the
Project
• May be natural, social, economic, etc.
8. Expected Private Sector Response
• Specify desired private sector participation, e.g., investments
• What are the expected responses by the private sector and other stakeholders to the
changes that will result from the project?

ANNEX B (Form 3c)

New Development Investment Financing Potential, 20__ to 20__
LGU Name __________
Y0 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Y6
2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028
1.0 Projected Total Revenues
Less
2.0 Projected Mandatory

Expenditures
2.1 Personal Services
2.2 MOOE
2.3 Capital Outlay
2.4 Debt Service
2.5 Other Contractual
Obligations
2.6 5% Calamity Fund
3.0 New Development

Investment Financing
Potential (NDIFP) (1.0 – 2.0 =
3.0)
4.0 Internal Revenue Allotment
(IRA)
5.0 20% Local Development
Fund (LDF) (20% of IRA)
6.0 LDF Compliance Ratio
(3.0/5.0) *Note: Compliance
should be LDF Compliance
Ratio ≥1)
Signed:
__________________ __________________ _________________

Treasurer Budget Officer Planning Officer
Date:

Notes:
Item Description/Source Document Responsible Person

No.
Y0 Current Year Local Finance
Committee
Y1 First Forecast Year – First Year After Current Year Local Finance
Committee
Y2 Second Forecast Year – Second Year After Current Year Local Finance
Committee
Y3 Third Forecast Year – Third Year After Current Year Local Finance
Committee
1.0 Projected Total Revenues – Local Resource Mobilization Local Treasurer
Program, Row C. Grand Total
2.0 Projected Mandatory Expenditures = Personal Services Local Finance
(PS) (2.1) + Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses Committee
(MOOE) (2.3) + Capital Outlay (CO) (2.3) + Debt Service
(2.4) + Other Contractual Obligations (2.5) + 5% Calamity
Fund (2.6)
2.1 Personal Services (PS) – Forward Estimates Local Budget Officer
2.2 Maintenance and Other Operating Expenses (MOOE) – Local Budget Officer
Forward Estimates
2.3 Capital Outlay (CO) – Forward Estimates Local Budget Officer
2.4 Debt Service – Summary of Medium-Term Debt and Non- Local Treasurer
Debt Contractual Obligations, Row A. Sub-total
2.5 Other Contractual Obligations - Summary of Medium- Local Treasurer
Term Debt and Non-Debt Contractual Obligations, Row
B. Sub-total
2.6 5% Calamity Fund Local Budget Officer
3.0 New Development Investment Financing Potential = Total Local Planning Officer
Revenues (1.0) – Projected Mandatory Expenditures
(2.0)
4.0 Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA) - Local Resource Local Treasurer
Mobilization Program, Row B.1.
5.0 20% Local Development Fund – 20% of IRA (4.0) Local Budget Officer
6.0 LDF Compliance Ratio = New Development Investment Local Finance
Financing Potential (NDIFP) (3.0) / 20% Local Committee
Development Fund (5.0)

ANNEX B (Form 3d)

MEDIUM-TERM FINANCING PLAN, 20__ TO 20__. (Version 2.0)
LGU NAME:
Year One: 20___
Uses of Funds (B) / Total Use Total Resource (A =
Item No. A.1 A.2 A.3
Sources of Fund (A) (B) A.1+A.2+A.3+A.4) A.4
External Financing – National Other Financing
Intergovernmental
Own-Source Revenues Government, Other LGU, and Options (e.g.,
Fiscal Transfers
Development Partner. Loans, PPPs, etc.)
Current Operating
B.1 Expenses (PS + 0
MOOE + CO)
Debt Service and
Other Non-Debt
B.2 0
Contractual
Obligations
B.3 5% Calamity Fund 0
New Program,
Projects and
B.4 Activities (PPAs) 0
including 20%
Development Fund
Total 0 0 0 0 0 0

Year Two: 20___

Item No. Uses of Funds (B) / Sources of Fund
Amount
(A) A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4
Intergovernmental
Fiscal Transfers
Current Operating
MOOE + CO)
Debt Service and
Other Non-Debt
B.2 0
Contractual
Obligations
New Program,
Projects and
including 20%
Development Fund
B Total 0 0 0 0 0 0
Year
Three: 20___
Item No. Uses of Funds (B) / Sources of Fund
Amount
(A) A.1 A.2 A.3 A.4
Intergovernmental
Fiscal Transfers
Current Operating
MOOE + CO)
Debt Service and
Other Non-Debt
B.2 0
Contractual
Obligations
New Program,
Projects and
including 20%
Development Fund
B Total 0 0 0 0 0 0

ANNEX B (Form 4)


ANNEX B (Form 5a)

Capacity Development Program
SECTORAL GOAL PRIORITY TARGET OFFICE DESIRED OUTCOME IMPLEMENTATION

HRD/CAPACITY STAFF DETAILS
DEVELOPMENT
(TIMEFRAME, WHO
INTERVENTION
ARE INVOLVED)
Example 1: Computerization of real Treasurer’s Office, Revenue collection from 1 year; treasury staff
property tax Assessor’s Office RPT increased by ___%
Increased own-source
revenue
Example 2: Training of rural health Rural health workers Upgraded knowledge 2 weeks, all rural health
workers and skills of rural health workers in the LGU
Improve access of the
workers on primary
poor to quality primary
health care
health care services

ANNEX B (Form 5b)

Sample Table of Legislative Requirements
SECTOR GOAL OBJECTIVE PRIORITY LEGISLATIVE TIME FRAME COMMITTEE

PROGRAMS REQUIREMENTS RESPONSIBLE
AND
PROJECTS
Improved local Increased Investment Amendment of 2007 Finance,

Economic economy investments Promotion Investment Code Appropriations,
Program Ways & Means
Improved Reduced fiscal Revenue Updating the 2008 Finance,

Institutional capacity of LGU gap Enhancement Revenue Code Appropriations,
Program Ways & Means
Improved Mangrove 2008 Environment

Environment marine Rehabilitation
environment Program

ANNEX B (Form 6a)

CY __________ ANNUAL/END-OF-TERM ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT
Province/City/Municipality of ______________________________________
PROGRAMS OUTPUT TARGET ACCOMPLISHME BENEFICIAR AREA ESTIMATE ACTUAL

AND INDICATORS NT Y COVERE D DISBURSE
PROJECTS D PROJECT MENT
PER SECTOR SECTOR
COST
(PHP)
1. Social
Sector
Nutri-Health ▪ Number of All 50% of barangays Women and 50 % of 2 Million

Program barangays barangays Children barangay
covered by s
micro-nutrient
supplementatio
n
▪ Number of
barangays
covered by
nutrition
education
All Women and
20% of barangays 1.2 Million
barangays children


PER SECTOR SECTOR
COST
(PHP)
50 % of
barangay
s
Water % of total 5% of all 10% of all Urban Poor Baranga 5 Million

Supply number households households y
Project households Poblacio
covered n
2. Economic
Sector
3.
Infrastructure


PER SECTOR SECTOR
COST
(PHP)
4.
Environmen
t
5. Institutional

ANNEX B (Form 6b)

M&E Strategy
RESULTS PERFORMANCE TARGETS DATA SOURCE COLLECTION FREQUENCY RESPONSIBILITY

INDICATORS FOR TO ASSESS METHODS CENTER
INDICATORS PERFORMANCE
(INDIVIDIAL
BENEFICIARIES,
GROUPS OF
BENEFICIARIES,
ORGANIZATIONS,
PARTNERS,
DOCUMENTS,
ETC.)
Goal/Impact Mortality Rate of Reduce LGU Health Office Document Every three Monitoring Team
(Long term) children aged 1-5 children under- review years and at
(LGPMS five mortality the end of nine
outcome rate by two- years
o Reduce indicator) thirds by 2015
infant (MDG Target
mortality no. 4)
(MDG no.
4)
Objective/ Every three Monitoring Team

Outcome years
(Medium term)

Outputs/ Annual Monitoring Team

Deliverables/
Products and
Services
delivered
(Short term)
Activities Every Department

(Ongoing) executive Heads
committee
meeting
Inputs Every Department

(Ongoing) executive Heads
committee
meeting

ANNEX D
CDP Review Process
A. Purpose of the Review:
• Assess the compliance of LGU’s Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) to the policy based budgeting principles
embodied in the CDP Guidelines.
• Determine the alignment with the Provincial Development and Physical Framework Plan (PDPFP) and Provincial
Development Investment Program (PDIP) with regards to:
o Development goals, objectives and strategies

o Physical framework
o Investment program
• Assess adherence of the preparation process, and content of the CDP submission vis-à-vis the requirements of policy based
budgeting as embodied in DILG’s guidelines.
• Provide a basis for improvements in in the CDP.
• Establish a measure for the future qualification and provision of performance grants and other support and assistance from
the National Government.
B. Who Conducts the Review:

• For component LGUs, the Provincial Development Council (PDC) with the Provincial Planning and Development Office
(PPDO) acting as technical secretariat.
C. Components of the Review Process:
• Form Review: To ensure that the submitted CDP documents are complete (i.e. there are no missing pages and all the
tables, maps and graphs are clear and in place) and determine whether the draft CDP conforms to the structure and
sequence described in the CDP Guidelines, and with other minimum form requirements.
• Process Review: To determine whether the CDP submission reflects the organizational/institutional processes (including
information sharing and consensus building) and content generation linkages envisioned by the enhanced guidelines.
• Content Review: To assess the substance and logic of the CDP submission with emphasis on the clarity,
comprehensiveness, and quality of various components of the planning and investment programming processes.
• The individual results of the process and content reviews are the bases for feedback and for revising or augmenting the
CDP submission, if necessary.
D. CDP Form Review:
• Completeness: The availability and timeliness of the key documents and forms comprising the CDP.
• Structure and sequence: The extent to which the draft CDP follows the structure and sequence prescribed in the enhanced
CDP Guidelines.
• Minimum maps and tables: The presence (or absence) of selected maps and tables.
• Source acknowledgement: Proper acknowledgement of sourced material through footnotes, endnotes, bibliographical
entries, etc.

E. CDP Process Review:
• Leadership involvement: The extent to which the draft CDP reflects the vision, policies and participation of the LGU
leadership, especially the Local Chief Executive (LCE), as indicated by:
o The participation of the LCE in the visioning activity; and

o The provision of updates to the Local Development Council (LDC).
• Consultation and participation: The extent to which the draft CDP reflects the views and aspirations of LGU stakeholders
and other constituents. This covers the amount or frequency of consultation as well as the entities involved – whether they
constitute the appropriate representatives of the sectors or interests concerned. Consultation and participation is also
distinguished according to horizontal and vertical linkages; horizontal linkages refer to consultation and participation within
the municipal/city level while vertical linkages refer to those with the barangay, and provincial levels.
o Number of hearings/consultations conducted;

o Number and type of municipal/city-level sectoral agencies, offices or organizations (public or private/NGO/PO)
represented in various stages of CDP preparation; and
o Number and type of barangay and provincial-level sectoral agencies, offices or organizations (public or private/NGO/PO)
represented in various stages of CDP preparation.
F. CDP Content Review:
• Quality of output and analysis internal to each main CDP component: This concerns the quality of analytical inputs
and corresponding outputs in each component, relative to internal objectives and logic, as described in the enhanced CDP
Guidelines.
o Vision/goals and objectives: Characteristics of the development vision/goals and objectives: long term, strategic, and
realistic.

o Ecological Profile:
▪ Description of location, land area and political subdivisions;

▪ Description of population and settlements relative to regional and provincial context;
▪ Description of existing settlements and overall growth trends;
▪ Description of land and water resources, land use potentials and constraints, identification of protection areas,
delineation of hazard zones;
▪ Description of local economic structure, assessment of industries with respect to potentials for contributing to
local economic growth and declining potentials;
▪ Identification of local factors that may enhance efficiency and competitiveness;
▪ Description of external linkages and internal circulation;
▪ Identification of priority external and internal linkages relative to population and settlement trends, physical
resources and protection areas and priority industries;
▪ Description of employment and unemployment conditions and family income levels;
▪ Description of levels and extent of services (e.g. health, education, housing, utility and infrastructure, others).
▪ Description of levels and extent of poverty; and
▪ Description of existing land uses, land use trends, and potential expansion areas.
o Strategies and PPAs:
▪ Sector-specific and/or location-specific characteristics of PPAs;

▪ Presence of poverty reduction strategies/PPAs;
▪ Presence of DRRM strategies/PPAs; and
▪ Description of initial funding estimate and legislative requirements, if any.
• Quality of linkages between components: This concerns the way the components relate to each other in the overall planning
process, which culminates in the identification of PPAs. The CDP process is designed so that the output of each component
feeds into others and are eventually integrated in the development planning framework and serves as basis for deriving issues,
goals, objectives, targets, strategies and PPAs.
o Development framework
▪ Consideration of spatial growth trends;

▪ Consideration for economic production potentials;
▪ Consideration of infrastructure requirements; and

▪ Consideration of environmental issues including DRRM.
o Development issues, goals, objectives, targets
▪ Issues based on planning analysis of ecological profile;

▪ Goals, objectives and targets as responses to identified issues; and
▪ Consistency with vision.
o Strategies and PPAs
▪ Strategies link to specific goals/objectives; and

▪ PPAs link to specific strategies.
G. LDIP Form Review:
• Structure and sequence: The extent to which the draft Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) follows the structure
and sequence prescribed in the LDIP Guidelines.
• Minimum maps and tables: The presence (or absence) of selected maps and tables.
• Source acknowledgement: Proper acknowledgement of sourced material through footnotes, endnotes, bibliographical
entries, etc.
H. LDIP Process Review:
The quality of the underlying organizational/institutional structures and processes behind the preparation of the draft LDIP.
This covers the following indicators:

• Existence and quality of a LDIP committee
o Existence of a formal and duly constituted LDIP committee;

o LDIP committee membership consistent with the guidelines; and
o Technical secretariat role of the Municipal/City Planning and Development Office (M/CPDO) in the LDIP committee.
• Existence and adherence to a LDIP preparation calendar.
• Promotion of public interest, consultation and participation.
o Existence of effective information dissemination;

o Frequency of information dissemination; and
o Conduct of public consultation during key stages of LDIP preparation.
 Content generation by appropriate bodies
o LDIP policy preparation by the LDIP committee;

o LDIP prioritization criteria preparation by the LDIP committee; and
o Revenue and expenditure projections preparation by finance group of LDIP committee.
I. LDIP Content Review:
Seeks to ensure that the PPAs are properly prioritized, ranked, and integrated into an effective and realistic financing plan
and investment schedule.
 Coverage of LDIP policies:
o PPAs limited to those identified in the CDP;

o Tie up of prioritization criteria to CDP objectives;
o Coverage of revenue policies, use of debt, special assessments and other financing tools; and

o Use of cost recovery policies.
 Quality of the LDIP financing plan and investment schedule
o Historical analyses of revenue and expenditure projections;

o Use of expected trends and developments for revenue and expenditure projections;
o Investment financing needs covered by projected fund sources;
o Statutory investment requirements especially 20% Development Fund covered by projected fund sources;
o Total annual debt service within 20% of total annual revenues;
o Cost recovery provisions; and
o Timing and staging considerations of investment phases.
J. Rating Compliance (Optional):
 Rating System:
o Full Compliance: The CDP fully or close to fully complies with the planning and investment programming principles
embodied in the RPS.
o Substantial Compliance: The CDP complies with the basic requirements. While the CDP submission is capable of
serving its overall objectives, it is recommended that the parts that are found lacking be remedied or revised during the
finalization or in the next review, if not earlier.
o Deficient: The CDP does not comply with the basic requirements and its objectives are significantly compromised. In
this case, it is recommended that the deficient parts be revised or remedied as soon as possible.
 Rating Form, Process and Content:
o Full Compliance: All rating criteria result in full compliance.
o Substantial Compliance: No deficiency is noted in each of the rating criteria.

o Deficient: At least one of the rating criteria is deficient.
 Overall Rating:
o Full Compliance (overall): Process and content reviews result in full compliance.
o Substantial Compliance (overall): At least one of the process and content reviews result in substantial compliance
but none are deficient.
o Deficient (overall): At least one of the process and content reviews is deficient.

CDP Hinundayan 2023-2028

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CDP Hinundayan 2023-2028

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CDP Hinundayan 2023-2028

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2023 - 2028

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

Title Page No.

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

Republic of the Philippines

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL MAYOR

EVELYN T. LEE, CPA

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

Republic of the Philippines

OFFICE OF THE MUNICIPAL VICE MAYOR

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

MDC RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CDP

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

SANGGUNIANG BAYAN RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CDP

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

Guided by the newly crafted Vision statement: “A progressive agricultural municipality

Furthermore, the Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) is integrated in this

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

Thus, Acknowledgement, is due to the following whose commitment and participation

To God be all thanks and glory!

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte

HINUNDAYAN’S HISTORY AND ITS BEGINNINGS

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 1

THE CREATION OF THE TOWN

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 2

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 4

AWARDS AND RECOGNITION

CY 2023 - Excellence Award Small Scale Category,

CY 2022 - Outstanding Performance, Peace and Order Council

- Top 1 in Region VIII COVID-19 Vaccination

- Fully Compliant Municipality 22nd Gawad KALASAG

CY 2021 - Seal of Child-Friendly Local Governance

- Awardee as LGU with Low Level of Stunting Prevalence

CY 2019 - DUGONG BIGAY, DUGTONG BUHAY AWARDEE

- Provincial First Placer, ADM Projects Implementation

- Topnotcher Peace and Order Council Audit

CY 2018 - DUGONG BIGAY, DUGTONG BUHAY AWARDEE

CY 2017 - Seal of Child-Friendly Local Governance

- Best in Coastal & Fisheries Resources Management & Dev’t.

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 6

LGU Brief Profile

Demographically, the municipality of Hinundayan posted a total population of 12,398 and

The municipality of Hinundayan is predominantly agricultural. It has a total agricultural land

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 7

Hinundayan’s economy is dominated by the primary sector: agriculture and fishery.

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 8

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 9

As a Local Government, Hinundayan is dependent on internal revenue allotment (IRA) now

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 10

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 11

It is geographically located in the Visayas Islands particularly in the southeastern tip of

Municipality of Hinundayan, Southern Leyte 12

Figure 1. Location Map of Hinundayan

MUNICIPALITY OF HINUNDAYAN, SOUTHERN LEYTE 13

Figure 2. Base Map of the Municipality of Hinundayan

MUNICIPALITY OF HINUNDAYAN, SOUTHERN LEYTE 14

Land Area and Political Subdivisions