Scribd
Upload
456 views4 pages

Raw Conditional Acceptance

To rebut any false claim without using their legal terms or jurisdiction, one can: 1. Give notice that any alleged debt or harm will be paid/remedied upon verification to an actual person within a set time. 2. If no verified claim from a person is received, make a claim against the person who brought the false claim. 3. Staying in honor and accessing the common law "court of record" for the people allows lawful rebuttal of false claims without consenting to their system. Verification is required to show an actual injured person and harm.

Uploaded by

Mr Cutsforth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
456 views4 pages

Raw Conditional Acceptance

To rebut any false claim without using their legal terms or jurisdiction, one can: 1. Give notice that any alleged debt or harm will be paid/remedied upon verification to an actual person within a set time. 2. If no verified claim from a person is received, make a claim against the person who brought the false claim. 3. Staying in honor and accessing the common law "court of record" for the people allows lawful rebuttal of false claims without consenting to their system. Verification is required to show an actual injured person and harm.

Uploaded by

Mr Cutsforth
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Living In The Private

Educate Yourself, Ask Questions, Verify Everything

 Home
 Dead or Alive
 Your Sovereignty
 Your Consent
 Your Credit
 The Courts

Conditional Acceptance
Living “in the private” can be challenging, because regardless of your efforts to assert your living
“standing”, the artificial legal “person” NAME will continue to receive demands for “payment”, or
“presentments”, until the perpetrators tire of the game. As a result, you may find that you are living in a
near constant state of stress and dispute, wasting much of your time and energy.

We often fall into dispute because we are conditioned to be defensive. This gives credibility to a false
claim and places you in dishonour. The “administrative courts” are adversarial, depending on argument
to function, and being in dishonour is guilt. Whereas acceptance of the truth, and seeking the truth, is
honourable. A judge who is honourable looks for evidence of the truth, so can you. When you “require”
“verification”, you shift the burden of proof to the “claimant” where it belongs: “I am happy to accept
any lawful obligation when you verify what you say is true. Go ahead, show me your evidence.”

All presentments to the artificial legal “person” NAME are offers of contract.

Presentments from incorporated governments/corporations are addressed to the artificial legal “person”
NAME, so they NEED a living man or woman to step into that “role” to take responsibility for the
liabilities attached to the NAME. Presentments from incorporated governments/corporations NEED a
man or woman to CONSENT to “act” in “joinder” to an artificial legal “person” NAME, forming a
CONTRACT.

When you REQUIRE the CLAIMANT to VERIFY their claim, a false claim will be exposed if there is
no contract signed by both parties; if no man or woman can step forward as the claimant; if there is no
invoice/bill signed by that man/woman; and if there is no evidence of a loss in the accounting. “Who is
the claimant?” “Who is the injured party?” “We will happily settle the account when the claimant
steps forward to sign the bill.” Pirates on the sea of commerce hide within corporate vessels to avoid
liability, so always “require” the claimant to come forward.
Alleged claims can be responded to with notices of “conditional acceptance”, which simply accept the
claim upon verification, failing which the claimant incurs liability. This is a lawful process.

Summary of your response:


To rebut any false claim (debt, ticket, summons, etc.), staying in honour and accessing your Common
Law “court of record” for the people:

1/ Immediately give notice that you will pay any debt/remedy any harm to a wo/man upon verification
of that debt/harm within x days.

2/ If there is no verified claim from a wo/man within x days, you make a claim against the wo/man who
brought the false claim.

Do NOT use legalese (motion, plaintiff, defendant, dismiss, plea, guilty, not guilty, etc.), because that
transfers you into their jurisdiction.

See Noticing Presentments


Some examples of notices of “conditional acceptance” can be found here:

http://www.getoutofdebtfree.org/

Home

Maxims of Law
Consensus facit legem. Consent makes the law. A contract is a law between the parties, which can
acquire force only by consent.

Qui tacet consentire videtur. A party who is silent appears to consent.

Non videntur qui errant consentire. He who errs is not considered as consenting.

Disparata non debent jungi. Unequal things ought not to be joined.

Disclaimer Notice
The content of this website is provided for educational purposes, omissions and errors excepted, and is
not legal/lawful advice.

Donate Bitcoin

14R9nnN5RcXxRgGhBZo4FFqskHVMJajpPQ

Maxims of Law
Ei incumbit probatio qui dicit, non qui negat. The burden of the proof lies upon him who affirms, not
he who denies.
Incerta pro nullis habentur. Things uncertain are considered as nothing.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus. False in one thing, false in everything.

Quaelibet jurisdictio cancellos suos habet. Every jurisdiction has its boundaries.
Copyright © 2023 Living In The Private | Powered by Blogger
Design by WpMultiverse | Blogger Theme by Lasantha - PremiumBloggerTemplates.com | BTheme.net
| Distributed By Gooyaabi Templates
Facebook Twitter GooglePlus Instagram Youtube Pinterest Linkedin Reddit Tumblr Wordpress

You might also like