This document contains the results of a learning organization assessment conducted using a 36 question survey. Overall, the organization scored an average of 3.27 out of 5, indicating a moderate extent of learning organization characteristics. Several areas scored highest, including open debate being encouraged, mistakes viewed as learning opportunities, and administrators enabling teacher self-development and performance improvement. Some areas scored lowest, such as cross-functional learning, understanding differences between training and learning, and scheduling reflection time.
This document contains the results of a learning organization assessment conducted using a 36 question survey. Overall, the organization scored an average of 3.27 out of 5, indicating a moderate extent of learning organization characteristics. Several areas scored highest, including open debate being encouraged, mistakes viewed as learning opportunities, and administrators enabling teacher self-development and performance improvement. Some areas scored lowest, such as cross-functional learning, understanding differences between training and learning, and scheduling reflection time.
This document contains the results of a learning organization assessment conducted using a 36 question survey. Overall, the organization scored an average of 3.27 out of 5, indicating a moderate extent of learning organization characteristics. Several areas scored highest, including open debate being encouraged, mistakes viewed as learning opportunities, and administrators enabling teacher self-development and performance improvement. Some areas scored lowest, such as cross-functional learning, understanding differences between training and learning, and scheduling reflection time.
This document contains the results of a learning organization assessment conducted using a 36 question survey. Overall, the organization scored an average of 3.27 out of 5, indicating a moderate extent of learning organization characteristics. Several areas scored highest, including open debate being encouraged, mistakes viewed as learning opportunities, and administrators enabling teacher self-development and performance improvement. Some areas scored lowest, such as cross-functional learning, understanding differences between training and learning, and scheduling reflection time.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
Derived from Kline and Saunders
Learning Organization Assessment
1= Not at all 4= To a Great Extent
2= To a Slight Extent 5= To a Very Great Extent 3=To a Moderate Extent
Question Score Question
Number 1 1 2 3 4 5 People feel free to speak their minds about what they have 4 learned. There is no fear, threat or repercussion for disagreeing or dissenting. 2 1 2 3 4 5 Mistakes made by individuals, grade levels, teams or 4 departments are turned into constructive learning experiences. 3 1 2 3 4 5 There is a general feeling that it’s always possible to find a 5 better way to do something. 4 1 2 3 4 5 Multiple viewpoints and open productive debates are encouraged 5 and cultivated. 5 1 2 3 4 5 Experimentation is endorsed and championed, and is a way of 3 doing business. 6 1 2 3 4 5 Mistakes are clearly viewed as positive growth opportunities 5 throughout the system. 7 1 2 3 4 5 There is willingness to break old patterns in order to experiment 3 with different ways of organizing and managing daily work. 8 1 2 3 4 5 Administrator practices are innovative, creative, and periodically 4 risk-taking. 9 1 2 3 4 5 The quality of work life in our organization is improving. 5 10 1 2 3 4 5 There are formal and informal structures designed to encourage 5 people to share what they learn with their peers and the rest of the organization. 11 1 2 3 4 5 The organization is perceived as designed for problem-solving 3 and learning. 12 1 2 3 4 5 Learning is expected and encouraged across all levels of the 5 organization: district and school leaders, teachers, paraprofessionals, and support staff. 13 1 2 3 4 5 People have an overview of the organization beyond their 4 specialty and function and adapt their working patterns to it. 14 1 2 3 4 5 “Lessons learned” sessions are conducted so as to produce clear, 2 specific and permanent structural and organizational changes. 15 1 2 3 4 5 School practices, operations, policies and procedures that 2 become obsolete by hindering the continued growth of people and the organization are removed and replaced with more workable systems and structures. 16 1 2 3 4 5 Continuous improvement is expected and treated receptively. 4 17 1 2 3 4 5 There are clear and specific expectations of each employee to 2 receive a specified number of hours of training and education annually. 18 1 2 3 4 5 Workers at all levels are specifically directed towards relevant 2 and valuable training and learning opportunities—inside and outside the organization. 19 1 2 3 4 5 Cross-functional learning opportunities are expected and 1 organized on a regular basis, so that people understand the functions of others whose jobs are different, but of related importance. 20 1 2 3 4 5 Middle managers (teachers and coaches) are seen as having the 3 primary role in keeping the learning process running smoothly throughout the organization. 21 1 2 3 4 5 The unexpected is viewed as an opportunity for learning. 3 22 1 2 3 4 5 People look forward to improving their own competencies as 2 well as those of the whole organization. 23 1 2 3 4 5 They systems, structures, policies and procedures of the 3 organization are designed to be adaptive, flexible, and responsive to internal and external stimuli. 24 1 2 3 4 5 Presently, even if the environment of the organization is 3 complicated, chaotic and active, nevertheless, it is not on overload. 25 1 2 3 4 5 There is a healthy, manageable level of stress that assists in 4 promoting learning. 26 1 2 3 4 5 Continuous improvement is practiced as well as preached. 5 27 1 2 3 4 5 The difference between training/education and learning is clearly 2 understood. (Training and education can be so conducted that no learning takes place.) 28 1 2 3 4 5 People are encouraged and provided the resources to become 4 self-directed learners. 29 1 2 3 4 5 There is a formal, on-going education program to prepare 3 teachers in their new roles as teacher leaders, coaches and administrators. 30 1 2 3 4 5 Recognition of your own learning style and those of co-workers 2 is used to improve communication and over-all organizational learning. 31 1 2 3 4 5 Administrators are sensitive to learning and development 3 differences among teachers, realizing people learn and improve themselves in different ways. 32 1 2 3 4 5 There is sufficient time scheduled into people’s professional 1 calendars to step back from day-to-day operations and reflect on what is happening in the organization. 33 1 2 3 4 5 There is direction and resource allocation planned to bring 3 meaningful and lasting learning. 34 1 2 3 4 5 Teams are recognized and rewarded for their innovative and 4 paradigm breaking solutions to problems. 35 1 2 3 4 5 Administrators have considerable skills for gathering 3 information and developing their abilities to cope with demanding and changing management situations. 36 1 2 3 4 5 Administrators enable their teachers to become self-developers, 5 and learn to improve their performance.