Chapter 6 (Variance Analysis)
Chapter 6 (Variance Analysis)
Variance Analysis
Learning Objective
Calculation:
MUV = (AQ – SQ ) x SP
=(6,500 pounds × $4.00) − (6,000* pounds × $4.00)
= $26,000 − $24,000
= 2000 Unfavorable
Standard Total
Actual Difference
Type of Standard Quantity Quantity
Quantity in Quantity Explanation
Materials Price
(pounds)
Allowed Variance
(pounds)
(2) – (3) (1) × (4)
Low quality
$2,000 materials
Pewter $4.00 6,500 6,000 500
Unfavorable unsuitable for
production
Calculation
LRV = (Actual hours worked × Actual rate) − (Actual hours worked
×Standard rate)
= (5,400 × $13.75) − (5,400 × $14.00 )
= 74,250 − 75,600
Labor rate variance = $(1,350) Favorable
Solution:
Time Rate Amount
5,000* = 2,000 actual production × 2.50 standard hour allowed per unit
Processing of 2000 units required more time than what was allowed by
standards. The result is an unfavorable labor efficiency variance. A favorable
labor efficiency variance occurs when actual processing time is less than the
time allowed by standards.
Exercise
Exercise : Labor Variance Analysis
= RM 50,000
----------------
*2000 units *(10000/5) (1 unit 5 hours if
10000 hours, how many unit can be produce ?
= RM 25 perunits
VPOV = AC - SC
Labour hours used as a basis for absorption
Variable production overhead rate
= RM 50,000
----------------
10000 hours
= RM 5
AC - SC
VOH (Expenditure) = Actual Overhead – (Actual
hours x Standard Variable Overhead Rate)
= AVOH – SVOH
Eg. The budgeted fixed production overhead for XYZ Ltd for
the year 2012 is 144,000. It is estimated that the labor
time for the year is 36,000 hours and the standard labor
time for one unit product is 3 hours. The company
manage to produce a total of 11,700 units within 34,500
hours. Actual fixed overheard incurred was RM 150,000.
Calculate:
i. Fixed Production Overhead Expenditure Variance
(FOHEV)
ii. Fixed Production Overhead Volume Variance
(FOHVV)
Fixed Production Overhead Variance
i) FOHEV = Actual Expenditure – Budgeted Expenditure
= RM 150,000 – RM144,000
= RM 6000 (UF)
ColaCo
Production and Machine-Hour Data
Budgeted production 30,000 units
Standard machine-hours per unit 3 hours
Budgeted machine-hours 90,000 hours
Actual production 28,000 units
Standard machine-hours allowed for the actual production 84,000 hours
Actual machine-hours 88,000 hours
Computing Fixed Overhead
Variances
ColaCo
Cost Data
Budgeted variable manufacturing overhead $ 90,000
Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead 270,000
Total budgeted manufacturing overhead $ 360,000
Predetermined $360,000
=
overhead rate 90,000 Machine-hours
Predetermined
= $4.00 per machine-hour
overhead rate
Predetermined Overhead Rates
Overhead
= $336,000
applied
Investigation of Standard Cost
Variances
It is important to note that standard
cost variances are not a definitive
sign of good or bad performance.
These variances are merely
indicators of potential problems
which must be investigated. And
there are many plausible
explanations for them.
Management by Exception
Because investigation of standard cost
variances is itself a costly activity,
management must decide which
variances to investigate. Most managers
practice management by exception. What
is “exceptional?” Usually an absolute
dollar amount or a percentage dollar
amount.
Basic Concepts
Static-Budget Variance (Level 0) – the
difference between the actual result and the
corresponding static budget amount
Favorable Variance (F) – has the effect of
increasing operating income relative to the
budget amount
Unfavorable Variance (U) – has the effect of
decreasing operating income relative to the
budget amount
“Favorable” Variances May Be
Unfavorable
The fact that a variance is “favorable” does not
mean that it should not be investigated. Raw
materials are good examples of this
phenomenon, especially considering the
competitive pricing environment for most
commodities. Suppose inferior, low-priced
materials are ordered. One the one hand, a
favorable price variance will arise. On the other
hand, most likely there will be substantially
more scrap and rework, and thus a higher
quantity variance.
Responsibility Accounting and
Variances
As noted previously, managers should
be held responsible only for costs they
can control. This is true in the area of
variance analysis. For example, a
purchasing agent may be held
responsible for direct material price
variances, but certainly not direct
material quantity (usage) variances.
Responsibility for Labor Variances