Research
Research
2
Research process
A research process consists of series of actions or steps which are necessary to
effectively carry out research. These actions or steps are summed up in the following list:
- Formulating the research problem
- Extensive literature survey
- Developing the research hypothesis
- Preparing the research design
- Determining sample design
- Collecting the research data
- Execution of the project
- Data analysis and discussion
- Hypothesis testing
- Generalization and interpretation
- Preparing the report and presentation of the result
3
5. Determining sample design
A sample design is a definite plan determined, before any data is actually collected, for
obtaining a sample from a given population. Sample designs can be either probability or non-
probability. With probability samples each element has a known probability of being included
in the sample, but the non-probability samples do not allow the researchers to determine this
probability.
6. Collecting the data
There are several ways of collecting the appropriate data which differ considerably in
terms of cost, time and other resources at the disposal of the researcher. Primary data can be
collected either through experiment or through survey. In case of survey, data can be collected
by any one or more of the following ways: observation, personal interview, telephonic
interviews, distributing/ mailing of questionnaires etc…
7. Execution of the project
Execution of the project is a very important step in the research process. If the execution
of the project proceeds on correct ways, the data to be collected would be adequate and
dependable. A careful watch should be kept for unanticipated factors in order to keep the
survey realistic as much as possible.
8. Data analysis and discussion
The analysis of data requires a number of closely related operations such as
establishment of categories, the application of these categories to raw data through coding,
tabulation and then drawing statistical inference. Analysis work, after tabulation, is generally
based on the computation of various percentages, coefficients etc., by applying various well
defined statistical formulae. In the process of analysis, relationships of differences supporting
or conflicting with original or new hypotheses should be subjected to tests of significance to
determine with what validity data can be said to indicate any conclusions.
After you have collected an adequate number of responses to your survey, take a look at
the data to see what they say. Gaining an accurate understanding of your survey results is the
final step in the survey process. You may be interested in Quantitative (Numeric) Data. That
is using statistics and considering how many respondents have this or that answer. You may
also be interested in Qualitative Data analysis. In this respect, start by reading all the
comments to have an idea about the answers of the respondents. Then categorize the
comments into different areas. Look for links between the numeric results and the comments.
When presenting results bear in mind that “The key skill is first to decide what results are
representative, and then organize them in a sequence that highlights the answers to the aims,
hypotheses or questions that you set yourself at the beginning of the paper. In many
disciplines this involves the use of figures and tables, which are commented on in the text. In
4
other disciplines, findings are only reported in text form.” Wallwork (2016: 296).
9. Hypothesis testing
After analyzing the data, the researcher is in a position to test the hypothesis, if any, he
had formulated earlier. Do the facts support the hypothesis or they happen to be contrary?
This is the usual question which should be answered by applying various tests. Hypothesis
testing will result in either accepting the hypothesis or in rejecting it. If the researcher had no
hypothesis to start with, generalizations established on the basis of data may be stated.
- The procedural design of the research should be carefully planned to yield results that
are as objective as possible.
- The analysis of data should be sufficiently adequate to reveal its significance and the
methods of analysis used should be appropriate.
- Conclusions should be confined to those justified by the data of the research and
should be limited to those for which the data provide an adequate basis.
- The validity and reliability of the data should be checked carefully. A word need to be
said about these two substantial elements of research together with some ethical
consideration related to research in the following section.
5
Validity, reliability and ethical consideration in research
1. Validity
Validity is a basic criterion of research tools. It is described as the degree to which a
research study measures what it intends to measure. There are two main types of validity,
internal and external. Internal validity refers to the validity of the measurement and the test
itself, whereas external validity refers to the ability to generalize the findings to the target
population. Both are very important in analysing the appropriateness, meaningfulness and
usefulness of a research study.
A distinction is also made between face validity and content validity. Face validity
refers to whether a technique looks as if it should measure the variable it intends to measure.
To guarantee face validity, all the questions included in a research tool should be formulated
in a simple language to ensure clarity and ease of understanding for the respondents. The
piloting stage as a trial administration of the research tools is of great importance to gauge the
clarity of the questions and the appropriateness of the difficulty level for the respondents.
Content validity is defined by Cohen, Manion & Morrison (2007) as a form of validity
that ensures that the specified elements of an issue to be examined in a research project are
enough in terms of representing the wider issue under investigation. Some main components
of the study should be specified and should be under control. These areas constitute the main
axes of the study. In other words, the research tools should be oriented to measure what we
intend to measure.
Briefly, validity is important because if the results of a study are not deemed to be valid,
then they are meaningless to the study. If the research tool does not measure what we want it
to measure, then the results cannot be used to answer the research question which is the main
aim of the study. These results cannot, then, be used to generalize any findings and become a
waste of time and effort.
2. Reliability
This is another criterion which is mainly used to describe the overall consistency (or
repeatability) of a measure. Polit and Hungler (1993) refer to reliability as the degree of
consistency with which an instrument measures the attribute it is designed to measure. This is
guaranteed by administering the same form of each tool to all the concerned target population.
3. Ethical considerations
To abide by the ethics of research, researchers should do their best to secure honesty,
anonymity, confidentiality and informed consent. The latter is very crucial in research. It is
defined by Burns and Grove (1993) as the agreement of the prospective subjects to participate
in a study. Consent should be received from the respondents to participate voluntarily in
research. The objectives and scientific purpose of the study should also be explained.
6