Bie2013 Income Approach Report
Bie2013 Income Approach Report
LECTURERS:
DR SR AINORIZA BINTI MOHD AINI
ASSOCIATE PROF. DR. SR. ROSLI BIN SAID
AW YI HUI U2104549
HELD UNDER
TITLE NO GRN313147
LOT 60445 SEKSYEN 39
BANDAR PETALING JAYA
DISTRICT OF PETALING
SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN
CLIENT AND INSTRUCTORS
Dear Sir/Madam,
We refer to the instructions from See Hoy Chan Sdn. Bhd. to assess the market value of the
above captioned property for financing purpose.
2. We have carried out inspection of the property and investigated available data related and
relevant matters. We are pleased to report that in our opinion, the market value of the subject
property free from all encumbrances is RM705,000,000. Our full report and Valuation is
contained herein.
3. We would also wish to refer to Limiting Conditions at the end of this report to govern its
particular use and application. This report is confidential to and for use only by the client
whom it is addressed to and for the specific and particular use to which it refers to.
Figure 1: Total Existing Space and Occupancy Rate of Shopping Complex H1 2019 to
H1 2022 ..................................................................................................................... 14
Figure 2: Space Availability and Availability Rate of Shopping Complex H1 2019 to H1
2022 ........................................................................................................................... 16
Figure 3: Shopping Centre Rental Index & Annual Growth of Klang Valley, WP Kuala
Lumpur and Selangor Q2 2022P ............................................................................... 19
Figure 4: Klang Valley SC-RI Neighbourhood Centre & Annual Growth Q2 2022P ......20
Figure 5: Average Rental of Shopping Centre (RM p.s.m) in Klang Valley, WP Kuala
Lumpur and Selangor Q1 2022 to Q2 2022P ............................................................ 22
LIST OF TABLES
1
6.0 DEFINITION OF MARKET VALUE
“Market Value” is the estimated amount for which an asset or liability should
exchange on the valuation date between a willing buyer and a willing seller in an
arm’s length transaction after proper marketing and where the parties had each acted
knowledgeably, prudently and without compulsion.
Each element of the definition has its own conceptual framework as follows
according to Malaysia Valuation Standard 6th Edition:
(a) “the estimated amount…” refers to a price expresses in terms of money payable
for the asset in an arm’s length transaction. Market Value is the most probable price
reasonably obtainable in the market on the valuation date in keeping with the market
value definition. It is the best price reasonably obtainable by the buyer. The estimate
specifically excludes an estimated price inflated or deflated by special terms or
circumstances such as atypical financing, sale and leaseback arrangements special
considerations or concession granted by anyone associated with the sale, or any
element of value available only to a specific owner or purchaser.
(b) “…an asset should exchange…” refers to the fact that the value of an asset or
liability is an estimated amount rather than a predetermined amount or the actual sale
price. It is the price in a transaction that meets all the elements of the Market Value
definition at the valuation date.
(c) “…on the valuation date…” requires that the value is time-specific as of given
date. Because markets and market conditions may change, the estimated value may be
incorrect or inappropriate at another time. The valuation amount will reflect the
market state and circumstances as the valuation date, not those at any other date.
2
(d) “…between a willing buyer…” refers to one who is motivated, but not compelled
to buy. This buyer is neither over eager nor determined to buy at any price. This
buyer is also the one who purchases in accordance with the realities of the current
market and with current market expectations, rather than in relation to an imaginary
or hypothetical market that cannot be demonstrated or anticipated to exist. The
assumed buyer would not pay a higher price than the market requires. The present
owner is included among those who constitute “the market”.
(e) “…a willing seller…” is neither an over eager nor a forced seller prepared to sell
at any price, nor one prepared to hold out for a price not considered reasonable in the
current market. The willing seller is motivated to sell the asset at market terms for the
best price attainable in the open market after proper marketing, whatever the price
may be. The factual circumstances of the actual owner are not a part of this
consideration because the willing seller is hypothetical owner.
(f) “…in an arm’s length transaction” is one between parties who do not have a
particular or special relationship e.g., parent and subsidiary companies or landlord
and tenant that may make the price level uncharacteristic of the market or inflated.
The Market Value transaction is presumed to be between unrelated parties, each
acting independently.
(g) “…after proper marketing…” means that the asset has been exposed to the market
in the most appropriate manner to effect its disposal at the best price reasonably
obtainable in accordance with the Market Value definition. The method of sale is
deemed to be that most appropriate to obtain the best price in the market to which the
seller has access. The length of exposure time is not a fixed period but will vary
according to the type of asset and market conditions. The only criterion is that there
must have been sufficient time to allow the asset be brought to the attention of an
3
adequate number of market participants. The exposure period occurs prior to the
valuation date.
(h) “…where the parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently…” presumes that
both the willing buyer and the willing seller are reasonably informed about the nature
and characteristics of the asset, its actual and potential uses, and the state of the
market as of the valuation date. Each is further presumed to use that knowledge
prudently to seek the price that is the most favourable for their respective positions in
the transaction. Prudence is assessed by referring at the state of the market at the
valuation date, not with benefit of hindsight at some later date. For example, it is not
necessarily imprudent for a seller to sell assets in a market with falling prices at a
price that is lower than previous market levels. In such cases, as is true for other
exchanges in markets with changing prices, the prudent buyer or seller will act in
accordance with the best market information available at that time.
4
7.0 PARTICULARS OF TITLE
The following shows the particulars of title of subject property that was obtained
from Selangor Land and Mines Office (Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor):
District Petaling
State Selangor
Certified copy of the land title and title search is attached as Appendix A.
5
8.0 LOCATION OF PROPERTY
The subject property is held under Title No. GRN 313147 identified as Lot No.
60445 Seksyen 39, Bandar Petaling Jaya, District of Petaling, Selangor. The subject
property as shown edged RED on the attached site plan, is addressed at 6, Jalan SS 21/37,
Damansara Utama, 47400 Petaling Jaya, Selangor. The subject property is located in the
Golden Square of Petaling Jaya, known as Damansara Uptown. Geographically, the
subject property is located approximately 8.2 kilometres in the direction of south-east
from the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ).
The subject property is also accessible via Jalan Yong Shook Lin, Jalan Sultan,
Jalan Barat, Jalan Utara, Jalan Professor Khoo Kay Kim, Jalan Harapan, Jalan 19/8, Jalan
SS 2/24, Jalan SS 2/75, merge onto Damansara-Puchong Expressway, exit to Jalan SS
21/56 and Jalan SS 21/37 from MBPJ leading to the subject property.
The subject property is located inside the box coloured RED on the location map
attached. A location map and location plan are enclosed herewith as Appendix C and
Appendix D respectively for easy reference.
6
9.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Site Description
Building Description
Erected from the 17,314 square metres (equivalent to 186,374 square feet) of the
site Subject property is a shopping mall, known as The Starling Mall which operates
daily from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m.
The subject property is a 7-storey shopping mall with a total net lettable area of
approximately 460,311.95 square feet which is owned by See Hoy Chan Sdn. Bhd. The
main entrance of the subject property faces Jalan SS 21/37, Damansara Utama. It has a
basement (B1), ground floor (G), first floor (1), second floor (2), third floor (3), fourth
floor (4) and fifth floor (5).
As provided by the car park operation of The Starling Mall, there are a total of
2,093 parking bays from basement level to fourth floor except the ground floor. The car
park of The Starling Mall was managed by See Hoy Chan Sdn. Bhd. which is the owner
of The Starling Mall.
The tenant mix of the Starling Mall comprises hypermarket, food and beverage
stores, beauty and wellness services, information technology outlets, electrical retails,
7
franchises as well as entertainment, amusement and kids’ education centres. This 7-storey
shopping mall is mainly accessible by escalators, elevators and staircases. There are fire
lifts and emergency staircases provided.
Ceilings Concrete slab with exposed lighting, air conditioning ducts, pipes
and water sprinkler system on all floors
8
The net lettable area for each floor is as of below:
As at the date of inspection, we noted that the building is in new and good condition.
Building Services
Major building services installed within the building are briefly described as below:
a. Air-conditioning System
9
b. Ventilation and Smoke Control System
c. Electrical System
The electrical supply to the subject property is from a TNB sub-station situated at the
basement of the building. Standby power supply is provided and operates
automatically in the event of an emergency power outage and is ready on standby to
temporary provision of power to all essential areas without any undue disruptions.
d. Vertical Movement
The subject property is accessible by lifts, staircases and escalators to all floors. The
escalators are located at the west end, centre and east end of the subject property
respectively on every floor. There are 6 elevators available around the shopping mall
along with staircases accessible to all floors.
10
f. Security System
The security service is managed by their own in-house management team and security
guards are stationed at the entrances, lift lobbies and car parking areas of the shopping
mall. The security guards will patrol at designated routes during their shifts. Closed-
circuit televisions (CCTVs) are installed within the whole building and car parks.
The subject property is supplied with hot and cold-water supply. Water supply is
stored in domestic water tanks and fire-fighting water tanks.
h. Telecommunication
The building is served with a standard telephone service and P.A. system. Telephone
system is linked to the PABX system, facsimile system and broadband system.
11
10.0 NEIGHBOURHOOD OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
12
13.0 PUBLIC UTILITIES AND SERVICES
Transportation facilities in the form of bus, MRT and LRT are available within
the vicinity of the subject property. Rapid KL buses such as T784, 800, 780, 802 and
MRT Feeder Bus T813 are accessible to Damansara Uptown. The subject property can be
accessed through the usage of MRT and LRT such as Taman Tun Dr Ismail MRT station
and Kelana Jaya LRT station. In addition, there is also free shuttle bus service provided
by The Starling Mall. The Starling shuttle bus goes from Taman Tun Dr Ismail MRT
station to the Starling and back to Taman Tun Dr Ismail MRT station. Besides, The
Starling shuttle bus goes from Kelana Jaya LRT station to the Starling and back to
Kelana Jaya LRT station. Grab cars and taxis are all readily accessible in the area.
Furthermore, The Starling Mall is also equipped with a high level of security system,
which is guarded with 24-hour security service and 24-hour surveillance with Closed
Circuit Television System (CCTVs) for the safety protection of the mall.
13
15.0 MARKET ANALYSIS
The table and figure below provide an overview of the space occupied by
shopping complexes across the nation.
Figure 1: Total Existing Space and Occupancy Rate of Shopping Complex H1 2019 to
H1 2022
14
Type H1 2019 H2 2019 H1 2020 H2 2020 H1 2021 H2 2021 H1 2022
Total Retail 16,250.08 16,512.47 16,769.15 16,853.68 16,933.87 17,281.74 17,359.23
Space (‘000
s.m.)
Year-on-Year 1.8 1.6 1.6 0.5 0.5 2.1 0.4
Change (%)
Space 12,944.99 13,085.03 13,183.45 13,056.45 12,966.74 13,193.46 13,136.76
Occupied
(‘000 s.m.)
Year-on-Year 2.2 1.1 0.8 -1.0 -0.7 1.7 -0.4
Change (%)
Based on Figure 1 and Table 1 above, the total retail space of the shopping
complex has been increasing steadily every half year, which is from 16,250.08 square
metres in the first half of 2019 (H1 2019) to 17,359.23 square metres in the first half of
2022. The increment of total retail space is not more than 3% every six months. However,
the total space occupied has decreased slightly twice during 2 different periods. The two
periods are H1 2020 to H1 2021 and H2 2021 to H1 2022. It decreased 216.71 square
metres (1.7%) and 56.7 square metres (0.4%) respectively. The occupancy rate is in a
descending order as it dropped from 79.7% in H1 2019 to 75.7% in H1 2022.
15
Figure 2: Space Availability and Availability Rate of Shopping Complex H1 2019 to H1
2022
16
Type H1 2019 H2 2019 H1 2020 H2 2020 H1 2021 H2 2021 H1 2022
Total Retail 16,250.08 16,512.47 16,769.15 16,853.68 16,933.87 17,281.74 17,359.23
Space (‘000
s.m.)
Year-on-Year 1.8 1.6 1.6 0.5 0.5 2.1 0.4
Change (%)
Available 3,305.09 3,427.44 3,585.70 3,797.24 3,967.12 4,088.28 4,222.47
Space (‘000
s.m.)
Year-on-Year 0.0 3.7 4.6 5.9 4.5 3.1 3.3
Change (%)
The availability rate showed a slight increase to 24.3% in line with the increasing
retail space against 20.3% recorded in H1 2019. Selangor had the highest area of retail
space in the country, accounting for 21.9% (3.8 million s.m.) of the total existing space.
In terms of availability rate, the country saw a significant increase of available retail
space at 4.22 million s.m. as compared to 3.30 million s.m. (H1 2019). In H1 2022,
Selangor stood at the top of the total available space list, contributing 846,900 s.m.,
followed by Johor (677,820 s.m.), Kuala Lumpur (602,800 s.m.) and Pulau Pinang
(529,210 s.m.).
17
State Occupancy Rate (%) Increase/Decrease
H1 2021 H1 2022 by (%)
WP Kuala Lumpur 81.6 81.6 -
WP Putrajaya 80.5 85.8 +5.3
WP Labuan 96.5 97.3 +0.8
Selangor 78.8 77.7 -1.1
Johor 73.4 72.2 -1.2
Pulau Pinang 72.2 71.5 -0.7
Perak 84.5 76.4 -8.1
Negeri Sembilan 66.3 67.1 +0.8
Melaka 63.3 62.5 -0.8
Kedah 74.6 73.1 -1.5
Pahang 71.8 71.5 -0.3
Terengganu 78.5 78.8 +0.3
Kelantan 80.1 80.6 +0.5
Perlis 88.4 81.6 -6.8
Sabah 77.9 75.6 -2.3
Sarawak 74.7 76.3 +1.6
Malaysia 76.6 75.7 -0.9
The occupancy rate for retail space in shopping complexes has decreased from
76.6% in the first half of 2021 (H1 2021) to 75.7% in the first half of 2022. The National
Property Information Centre (NAPIC), which just released data for the first half of 2022,
revealed that the occupancy of retail malls decreased in 9 of the states in Malaysia. These
9 states are Selangor (-1.1%), Johor (-1.2%), Pulau Pinang (-0.7%), Perak (-8.1%),
Melaka (-0.8%), Kedah (-1.5%), Pahang (-0.3%), Perlis (-6.8%) and Sabah (-2.3%).
18
Among them, Perak and Perak recorded the most drastic decline in occupancy rate, where
both states dropped 8.1% and 6.8% respectively.
However, 6 states and federal territories have seen an increase in the occupancy of
retail mall space, namely Putrajaya (+5.3%), Labuan (+0.8%), Negeri Sembilan (+0.8%),
Terengganu (+0.3%), Kelantan (+0.5%) and Sarawak (+1.6%). According to the data
above, Putrajaya experienced the most growth in the occupancy rate, going from 80.5%
to 85.8%, an increase of 5.3%. The remaining state, Kuala Lumpur remained the same in
retail mall space occupancy rate which is 81.6% during the period of H1 2021 to H1 2022.
According to NAPIC, the number of buildings with more than 50% vacancy rate
decreased 3.59%, from 195 malls one year ago to 188 malls in H1 2022. On the other
hand, the total number of buildings with available retail space spiked 5.38%, from 790
buildings in H1 2021 to 815 buildings in H1 2022.
Figure 3: Shopping Centre Rental Index & Annual Growth of Klang Valley, WP Kuala
Lumpur and Selangor Q2 2022P
19
Figure 3 shows the rental index movement of Klang Valley, Kuala Lumpur and
Selangor in Q1 2015 - Q2 2022P. Klang Valley SC-RI increased by 5.06% from 102.8
points in Q3 2017 to 108.0 points in Q2 2022P. WPKL grew by 6.28% from 103.5 points
in Q3 2017 to 110.0 points in Q2 2022P. On the other hand, Selangor recorded a lower
growth of 4.68% at 107.4 points compared to 102.6 points in Q3 2017.
According to the Shopping Centre Rental Index (SC-RI) above, both states shared
the same quarterly growth at -0.1% in Q2 2021 and began to recover from Q3 2021.
Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur saw an increase of 1.0% in Q1 2022 and a lower
0.5% in Q2 2022P whereas Selangor recorded a 0.4% drop in Q1 2022 but picked up by
0.1% growth in the subsequent quarter. At Q2 2022P, Selangor recorded a higher average
rent at RM106.28 p.s.m. while Kuala Lumpur registered at RM85.73 p.s.m., which
analysed at RM95.79 p.s.m. for Klang Valley.
Figure 4: Klang Valley SC-RI Neighbourhood Centre & Annual Growth Q2 2022P
20
Generally, there are 4 types of shopping centres, which are super regional,
regional centre, neighbourhood centre and community centre. As the net lettable area of
The Starling Mall is around the range of 200,001 to 500,000 square feet (460,311.95
square feet), it is classified as a neighbourhood centre. Therefore, the figure above shows
the rental index movement of neighbourhood centres in Klang Valley, Kuala Lumpur and
Selangor during the period of Q1 2015 to Q2 2022P.
Neighbourhood centre has a wider range of apparel and other discretionary retail
with a heavy focus on foods & groceries, and other essential products. The
Neighbourhood Centre Rental Index (NC-RI) grew marginally at 1.1% year-on-year as at
Q2 2022P. Kuala Lumpur’s NC performed better than Selangor, which rose by 2.7% as
compared to 0.3%. On a quarterly basis, Kuala Lumpur managed to sustain growth
though at a low rate, but Selangor saw otherwise, contracted for two consecutive quarters.
As for the average rental, Selangor recorded a higher rate at RM84.15 p.s.m. as compared
to WPKL at RM55.05 p.s.m.
The average rental of shopping centres in Klang Valley, Kuala Lumpur and
Selangor are shown in Figure 5 below.
21
Figure 5: Average Rental of Shopping Centre (RM p.s.m) in Klang Valley, WP Kuala
Lumpur and Selangor Q1 2022 to Q2 2022P
The average rental of a shopping centre in Selangor was greater than Kuala
Lumpur, which was at RM106.28 per s.m. compared to RM85.73 per s.m. in Q2 2022P.
As for the Klang Valley’s Neighbourhood Centre Rental Index, the overall rental for
Selangor was RM84.15 per s.m., followed by Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur led
with an average rental of RM55.05 per s.m., which is higher by RM29.10 per s.m.
compared to that of Wilayah Persekutuan Kuala Lumpur. The annual changes for the
average rental of shopping centres in Klang Valley, Kuala Lumpur and Selangor has not
exceeded 3% during the period of Q2 2021 to Q2 2022P.
22
Property Market Scenario
However, with the end of the 15th general election in Malaysia followed by the
rise of political stability, the overall Malaysian economy will start to expand steadily. So,
the investment activities in the real estate market are also seen to be strong in the future
too. Due to the likelihood that landlords will maintain their rental expectations, market
rents are most likely to remain unchanged. Nevertheless, the landlords of newer shopping
complexes and those with a lot of vacant space will still be at a higher risk because they
don't have as much room to reduce their rental prices as the operational and maintenance
costs increased and the Government Service Tax (GST) was implemented too.
To sum up, the availability of retail space in Selangor is still reasonable and
satisfactory for both tenants and landlords. Yet, the current real estate market shouldn't be
taken lightly as it's considered to be extremely unpredictable.
23
16.0 BASIS OF VALUATION
The purpose of valuation of the subject property is financing. As the definition of
market value is defined as the estimated amount for which an asset should exchange on
the date of valuation between willing buyer and willing seller in an arm's length
transaction after proper marketing wherein the parties had each acted knowledgeably
prudently and without compulsion. The definition of market value would be our guideline
in selecting comparable in sales evidence.
Therefore, in order to find out the actual market value for our subject property
from the comparable property, some of the adjustments had been made. There are no
allowances being made in the valuation in the event of disposal or deemed because the
property is considered to be free from charges, lien, and other encumbrances.
24
18.0 ADOPTION OF TWO METHODS
��� ������
������� �����
The Gross Income for the property is generated through the tenancy or leasing
of the property. Outgoings are then deducted from the gross income to arrive at
the net income of the subject property. Outgoings taken into consideration are
taxes, repairs, maintenance fees, fire insurance fee and management fees.
1. Conventional/Traditional approach
a) Term & Reversion/Block technique
b) Hardcore/Layer/Marginal technique
2. Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) Technique
For the purpose of valuation in this report, the conventional approach term and
reversion technique is adopted.
25
18.2 COMPARISON METHOD
This approach was used as a cross-check method of valuation in valuing the
market value of subject property. In this approach the sales and listings of
comparable properties recorded in the area are compiled. From the compiled
data, adjustments are made between the subject property and those properties
regarded as comparable in order to arrive at a common denominator.
Kindly refer to Appendix N and Appendix O for the valuation working for
both methods, Investment Method and Comparison Method.
26
19.0 SALES EVIDENCE OF COMPARABLE PROPERTIES
The site value is also estimated by comparison with sales of similar properties adapted to
similar uses and located in or near the particular market area.
From our researches, we found that comparable properties have been transacted as
follow:-
Lot No. Lot 60445, Lot 45821 Lot 59212 Lot PT134
Seksyen 39
27
No of storey 7 storeys 6 storeys 4 storeys 8 storeys
Net Lettable 460,311.95 sq.ft 461,970.00 sq.ft 424,467.00 sq.ft 271,289.00 sq.ft
Area (sq.ft)
28
20.0 OPINION OF VALUE
This valuation is intended for financing purposes. After taking into consideration of all
the relevant factors affecting value, we therefore evaluate the market value of the subject
property is as follow:
We hereby certify that we have neither present nor prospective interest on the property
appraised or on the value reported.
21.0 CERTIFICATION
The valuation of the above property has been carried out by Koid Wei Hong, Registered
Valuer (V8820).
29
APPENDICES
30
APPENDIX A: DOCUMENT OF TITLE
DOCUMENT OF TITLE
31
Source: Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor
DOCUMENT OF TITLE
32
Source: Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor
DOCUMENT OF TITLE
33
Source: Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor
DOCUMENT OF TITLE
34
Source: Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor
DOCUMENT OF TITLE
35
APPENDIX B: TITLE SEARCH
TITLE SEARCH
36
Source: Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor
TITLE SEARCH
37
Source: Pejabat Tanah dan Galian Selangor
TITLE SEARCH
38
APPENDIX C: LOCATION MAP OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
LOCATION MAP
39
APPENDIX D: LOCATION PLAN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
LOCATION PLAN
40
APPENDIX E: NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
NEIGHBOURHOOD
PLAN
41
APPENDIX F: SITE PLAN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
SITE PLAN
42
APPENDIX G: ZONING PLAN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
ZONING PLAN
43
APPENDIX H: FLOOR PLAN OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
FLOOR PLAN OF
LEVEL B1
44
FLOOR PLAN OF
LEVEL G
45
FLOOR PLAN OF
LEVEL 1
46
FLOOR PLAN OF
LEVEL 2
47
FLOOR PLAN OF
LEVEL 3
48
FLOOR PLAN OF
LEVEL 4
49
FLOOR PLAN OF
LEVEL 5
50
APPENDIX I: GENERAL VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
FRONT VIEW
51
SIDE VIEW (WEST)
52
SIDE VIEW (EAST)
53
APPENDIX J: INTERNAL VIEW OF SUBJECT PROPERTY
INTERNAL VIEW
54
INTERNAL VIEW
55
INTERNAL VIEW
56
APPENDIX K: PUBLIC UTILITIES AROUND THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
57
MRT TTDI
58
APPENDIX L: COMPARABLE PLAN
COMPARABLE PLAN
59
APPENDIX M: LIST OF TENANTS
Basement
60
B-009 Caring Pharmacy 1254.52
61
B-022 Little Bubble Hut 320.55
Ground Floor
62
G-005 Padini Concept Store 3750.00
63
G-020 SASA 1748.00
64
G-034 Dim Dou Duck & Hou Yum Duck 3774.00
First Floor
65
F-108 Sorella & Pierre Cardin Concept Store 1115.00
66
F-121 The Green Party 900.00
67
F-135 Hoops Station 1988.00
Second Floor
68
S-206 Popular 2780.91
S-216 Mi 493.50
69
S-221 My Com 764.62
70
S-236 Tang Room 1846.23
Third Floor
71
T-312 Parkhill Dental 930.00
Fourth Floor
72
4-404 MR. D.I.Y. 8325.00
Fifth Floor
73
APPENDIX N: INVESTMENT METHOD
Explanatory Notes:
TERM
1. It is assumed that there is no relationship between the tenant and the landlord on the
tenancy agreement signed.
3. The occupancy rate of the subject property during the term period is 94.32%. During
the term period, the vacant units do not generate any income.
4. The monthly rental per square foot under term period for each floor of The Starling
Mall is retrieved from the leasing management office of The Starling Mall. The
monthly rental rate are as follows:
Floor No. Monthly rental per square foot (RM per sqft)
Basement 10.00-13.00
74
The net monthly rental/income for ATM and Car Park as of the tenancy agreement
are as follows:
Carpark RM500,000.00
5. The current outgoings under term period obtained according to the tenancy agreement
and annual financial report of The Starling Mall in 2022 that were obtained is
RM1.70. The components of outgoings of the subject property are as follows:
SAYS 1.70
75
6. The term yield, i=6%, was adopted for the term period. This yield is adopted after
taking into consideration the securities of income during the term period.
7. The subject property was subjected into a tenure of term in perpetuity. Thus, the
Year's Purchase Single Rate is adopted in the calculation. The formula used for the
Years Purchase Single Rate is:
�−1
Years Purchase Single Rate = �(�)
Where,
� = (1 + �)�
i = Interest Rate
n = Number of Years
8. The balance term is calculated from the date of valuation which is on 12th of
November 2022 towards the end of the tenancy term.
9. The capital value in term is calculated by multiplying the net annual income with the
Years Purchase Single Rate.
76
REVERSION
1. The occupancy rate of the subject property is assumed at 100% in the reversion
period.
2. The monthly rental per square foot on the reversion period for each floor of The
Starling Mall is retrieved from the market analysis of surrounding comparable
commercial properties around the subject property. The monthly rental rates are as
follows:
Floor No. Monthly rental per square foot (RM per sqft)
Basement 1 13.50
The net monthly rental/income for ATM and Car Park as of the reversion period are
as follows:
Carpark RM540,000.00
77
3. The outgoing under reversion period is retrieved from analysis on surrounding
commercial property, RM1.90 per sqft.
SAYS 1.90
4. Void rates must be taken into consideration when obtaining the net annual income of
the subject property. This is because there may be chances that the retail space
becomes void when the tenancy agreement with the previous tenant had ended or
during renovation period. The market analysis has recorded a 15% void rate of
surrounding property. However, the void rate is adjusted to 10% after taking into
consideration the occupancy rate performance of subject property. Therefore, the void
rate taken for the subject property under reversion period is 10% from the net annual
rental.
78
5. The yield for reversion period, i=7% was derived through market analysis and
information from National Property Information (NAPIC). Market analysis is done by
analysing the current yield of comparable commercial property located around the
subject property.
6. For the reversion period, the formula that were adopted are Years Purchase in
Perpetuity and Present Value for the Deferred Period:
1
����� ����ℎ��� �� ���������� =
�
1
������� ����� ��� ��������� ������ =
�
where
� = (1 + �)�
i = Interest Rate
7. The capital value of the subject property for reversion period is calculated by
multiplying net annual income with Years Purchase in Perpetuity and Present Value
for Deferment Period.
79
AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINE (ATM)
1. Automated Teller Machine (ATM) is rented at the rate of RM1,200.00 per unit. There
are 2 ATMs available in subject property which is Public Bank and CIMB bank
located at the Basement 1.
2. The market rent of Automated Teller Machine (ATM), RM1,200.00 per unit is
adopted through the market analysis of surrounding commercial properties.
3. The yield under term period for ATM is adopted at 6% for the rent receivable to
obtain the capital value of term because it reflects a more secure occupancy during
the leasing term.
CARPARK
1. Carpark in the subject property is managed by the owner of The Starling Mall.
3. The income of the car park is calculated based on the average parking rate per bay
which is at RM10 per day. The monthly income obtained will also take into
consideration the parking rate charged on visitors and staff into subject property.
4. Annual outgoings for car parks are allowed at 15% which includes the particulars of
quit rent, assessment rate, maintenance and management fees, and fire assurance.
5. The yield of 7% is applied for car park as it is considered as a part of the building of
subject property.
80
VALUATION WORKING ON INVESTMENT METHOD
The investment calculation is attached as per the excel file along with this report.
= Total Value for Tenants + Value for ATM Spaces + Value of Car Park
= RM704,280,275.00
SAY RM705,000,000.00
81
APPENDIX O: COMPARISON METHOD
82
Net Lettable 460,311.95 461,970.00 424,467.00 271,289.00
Area (sq ft)
83
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
84
Building Centralised air- Centralised air- 0% Centralised air- 0% Centralised 0%
Facilities condition condition condition air-condition
system, Lift, system, Lift, system, Lift, system, Lift,
Escalator, Car Escalator, Car Escalator, Car Escalator, Car
Park, Fire Park, Fire Park, Fire Park, Fire
Fighting Fighting Fighting Fighting
System, 24 System, 24 System, 24 System, 24
hours security hours security hours security hours security
Based on the comparison table made above, Comparable 1 is the best comparable due to
the least factor of adjustment made and least total percentage of adjustment it had
(+22%). Therefore, the estimated market value is RM1,426.06 per sq.ft.
= RM656,432,459
85
Explanatory Notes:
1. Time Factor
A positive adjustment of 6% is made for every year due to the increasing commercial
property price index. Based on the market analysis, the average commercial shopping
complex price index is 6% year on year basis. Therefore, a positive 12% is being
adjusted for comparable 1 due to 2 years has passed from the date of valuation of
subject property, a positive 18% for comparable 2 due to 3 years has passed from the
date of valuation of subject property while for comparable 3 has passed 1 year from
the date of valuation of subject property hence a positive 6% is being adjusted.
0 - 50,000 sq ft 5%
86
3. Location
The location of the subject property at No 6, Jalan SS 21/37 and is surrounded by
many shopping malls, restaurants, residential and office buildings. It is also located in
a relatively high populated area and mixed development area. It has very high
visibility and exposure to the people. Therefore , the comparable property that is
located at No 3, Jalan SS 20/27 and 1, Jalan PJU 1a/48, Ara Damansara are adjusted
to 5% as the surroundings of both comparable are similar which mostly consists of
residential buildings only whereby it is less exposed to the people compare to the
subject property.On the other hand, comparable C which is located at Jalan 14/17,
Seksyen 14 is adjusted up to 10% as the surroundings are mostly old commercial
building which will have the least exposure to people compare to other comparables
and subject property.
4. Tenure
The tenure of the subject property is term in perpetuity and same with comparable 1.
Therefore, no adjustment made on comparable 1. and comparable 2. While, the tenure
of comparable 2 and comparable 3 is Leasehold for 99 years (Unexpired Term: 92
years left) and Leasehold for 99 years (Unexpired Term: 45 years left). Hence, an
adjustment of 10% and 15% were made on both comparables respectively.
6. Accessibility
The accessibility for the subject property is better as they offer free shuttle buses for
the visitors and customers to transport them from the Starling Mall to MRT TTDI or
LRT Kelana Jaya and vice versa. This service is not offered from other comparable
properties. Hence, an adjustment of 5% is made on all 3 comparables.
87
7. Building Condition
Building condition of subject property and all comparable properties are the same. All
the buildings are maintained and currently are in good condition. There is no recent
refurbishment work that has been done on all the comparable. Thus no adjustment is
made.
8. Building Facilities
Since the subject property and all comparable properties have the same building
facilities including centralised air-condition system, lifts, car parks, fire fighting
system and 24-hour security, therefore no adjustments are made.
88
APPENDIX P: PERCENTAGE OF DIFFERENCE
Based on our calculation for investment method, the estimated market value for our
subject property was found to be RM 705,000,000.00 whereas the estimated market value
of the subject property deduced through the comparison method was found to be RM
660,000,000.00.
The percentage difference between estimated Market Value obtained through investment
method and comparison method are as follows:
��705,000,000.00 − ��660,000,000.00
= ± × 100%
��705,000,000.00
= 6.38%
Thus, the difference in value by using these two methods is RM 45,000,000 which is
approximately 6.38%. Having considered the prevailing market conditions and other
relevant factors, our opinion of the current open market value of the subject property is
RM 705,000,000 (by using Investment Method) and RM660,000,000 (by using
Comparison Method).
We have determined that the value derived via Investment method reflects the current
market value more accurately since the different shopping malls have different
occupancy rate and marketing strategy which will significantly affect the value of
transaction.
In conclusion, we are of opinion the estimated market value for the subject property is
assessed at RM 705,000,000 (Ringgit Malaysia: Seven Hundred and Five Million
Only)
89
APPENDIX Q: DECLARATION BY VALUER
DECLARATION BY VALUER
I, Sr Koid Wei Hong from KAHVY Valuers instructed by See Hoy Chan Sdn. Bhd. to
carry out a valuation on a 7 STOREY SHOPPING COMPLEX, HELD UNDER TITLE
NO GRN 313147, LOT 60445 SEKSYEN 39, BANDAR PETALING JAYA, STATE
OF SELANGOR (BEARING POSTAL ADDRESS: 6, JALAN SS 21/37,
DAMANSARA UTAMA, 47400 PETALING JAYA, SELANGOR, MALAYSIA) do
hereby declare that:
i. I am neither a director nor employee of that Company and do not have a significant
financial interest, direct or indirect, therein;
ii. The Firm’s partners or director are neither the directors nor employees of the
Company and they do not have significant financial interest, direct or indirect,
therein;
iii. The Company does not have a significant financial interest in the Firm; and
iv. I have complied with the requirement of the Guideline with respect to qualification
of valuer.
90
APPENDIX R: LIMITING CONDITIONS
LIMITING CONDITIONS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. A Valuer may accept instructions to value subject to certain limiting conditions
and exclusions as agreed with the client.
2. STATEMENTS OF STANDARD
2.1. Limiting conditions that directly affect the valuation must be explained clearly
where appropriate.
2.2. The following limiting conditions may appear on the Valuation Reports without
any further explanation: -
This Valuation Report is carried out in accordance with the Manual of Valuation
Standards published by the Board of Valuers, Appraisers and Estate Agents.
2.2.2. MEASUREMENTS
All measurements are carried out in accordance with the Uniform Method of
Measurement of Buildings issued by The Royal Institution of Surveyors, Malaysia.
2.2.3. CONFIDENTIALITY
This Report is confidential to the Client or to whom it is addressed and for the
specific purpose to which it refers. It may only be disclosed to other professional
advisors assisting the Client in respect of that purpose, but the Client shall not
91
disclose the report to any other person. Neither the whole, nor any part of the
Valuation Report or Certificate or any reference thereto may be included in any
published document, circular or statement nor published in any way without our
prior written approval of the form and context in which it may appear.
We shall bear no responsibility nor be held liable to any party in any manner
whatsoever in the event of any unauthorised publication of the Valuation Report,
whether in part or in whole.
The opinion of value expressed in the Report shall only be used by the addressee
for the purpose stated or intended in this Report. We are not responsible for any
consequences arising from the Valuation Report being relied upon by any other
party whatsoever or for any information therein being quoted out of context.
We have not conducted any land survey to ascertain the actual site boundaries. For
the purpose of this valuation, we have assumed that the dimensions correspond
with those shown in the title document, certified plan or any relevant agreement.
92
2.2.7. STRUCTURAL SURVEYS
While due care has been taken to note building defects in the course of inspection,
no structural surveys were made nor any inspection of woodwork or other parts of
the structure which were covered or inaccessible were made. We are therefore
unable to express an opinion or advice on the condition of uninspected parts and
this Report should not be taken as making any implied representation or statement
on such parts. Whilst any defects or items of disrepair may be noted during the
course of inspection, we are not able to give any assurance in respect of any rot,
termite or pest infestation or other hidden defects.
2.2.9. CONTAMINATION
We have not carried out investigations into the past and present use of either the
property or of any neighbouring land to establish whether there has been any
contamination or if there is any potential for contamination to the property and are
therefore unable to account and report for such contamination in our report.
Whilst due care is taken to note the presence of any disease or infestation, we have
not carried out any tests to ascertain possible latent infestations or disease
affecting crops or stock. We are therefore unable to account for such in our report.
93
2.2.11. LEASES AND TENANCIES
Unless otherwise stated, no considerations are made in our valuation for any joint
venture agreement, development right agreement or other similar contracts.
In the case of buildings where works are in hand or have recently been completed,
no allowances were made for any liability already incurred, but not yet discharged,
in respect of completed works, or obligations in favour of contractors,
subcontractors or any members of the professional or design team.
Unless otherwise stated, no allowances are made in our valuation for any expense
of realisation or for taxation which might arise in the event of a disposal, deemed
or otherwise. We have considered the property as if free and clear of all charges,
lien and all other encumbrances which may be secured thereon. We also assumed
the property is free of statutory notices and outgoings.
94
2.2.15. VALIDITY PERIOD OF VALUATION REPORT
This valuation is current as at the date of valuation only. The value assessed herein
may change significantly and unexpectedly over a relatively short period
(including as a result of general market movements or factors specific to the
particular property). We do not accept liability for losses arising from such
subsequent changes in value.
3. EXPLANATIONS
3.1. Whilst it is desirable that all the limiting conditions and exclusions which appear
in Valuation Reports be properly and fully explained, it may not be practical to do so.
Neither is it possible to have a comprehensive list to cover all other circumstances.
Suffice it is to say that the above may appear in Valuation Reports without any further
explanation and shall form part of the conditions of engagement between the Client and
the Valuer, unless expressly excluded.
95
APPENDIX S: MEETING MINUTES
Our group has conducted several meetings and discussions to ensure that the assignment
can be completed within the time. All the members have attended each meeting. Our
group members are:
96
8 November 2022 ● Pejabat Tanah Dan ● Went to PTG Selangor to
Galian Negeri perform a title search.
Selangor, Tingkat
LG, G, 1, 3, 4,
Bangunan Sultan
Salahuddin Abdul
Aziz Shah, 40576
Shah Alam, Selangor
Darul Ehsan.
12 November 2022 ● 6, Jalan SS 21/37, ● Site inspection of the
Damansara Utama, property.
47400 Petaling Jaya,
Selangor.
13 November 2022 ● Online Google Meet ● Discussion with all the
members to distribute the
works for interim
presentation and the task of
valuation report writing.
27 November 2022 ● Online Google Meet ● Discussion on the progress
and problems occur.
● Prepare for an interim
presentation.
30 November 2022 ● BK6, Faculty of Built ● Interim presentation.
Environment
8 December 2022 ● Online Google Meet ● Discussion on the progress
and problems occur.
97
30 December 2022 ● Online Google Meet ● Compile all the work done
by each group member.
● Final confirmation on the
report.
With the commitment given by every group member, we have successfully completed
our assignment within the given dateline.
Thank you.
Reported by,
98