161

THE EARTH IN AN ELECTRIC SOLAR SYSTEM

Louis A.G. Hissink M.Sc. MAIG, MIEEE

Consulting Exploration Geologist, Perth, WA, Australia
E-Mail:[email protected]

ABSTRACT
Since Isaac Newton’s time till the present, science has described the universe in
terms of his laws of gravitation without explanation but since the development of
the modern industrial age electrical engineers have also noted unexpected
electromagnetic behaviour in the various engineered systems humanity uses
whether on land, in the oceans and in space. The electromagnetic solar connection
is best explained by theories of the electric plasma universe in which the Earth is
thought to be electro-dynamically connected to the electric plasma of space.
Laboratory plasma experiments and particle-in-cell computer simulations using
the equations of Maxwell and Lorentz have accurately described galaxy
morphology and motions, and from the scalability of plasma phenomena, it is
possible to explain other similar rotary phenomena such as Earth based hurricanes.
This paper is a brief summary of the more salient aspects of the Earth’s electrical
plasma environment.

1. INTRODUCTION
Some fifty years ago a small book, Rival Theories of Cosmology, was published by
Oxford University Press which noted three prevailing theories of the universe:

a) Relativistic theories (basically variants of the Big Bang),

b) Steady State Theory and
c) The Electric Universe Theory.

The Big Bang theory proposes that the universe appeared at some initial point in time
and expanded to its present state. The Steady State Theory and the Electric Universe
theories both assumed the universe always existed but the latter proposes that 99% of
the visible universe is comprised of matter in the plasma state in which
electromagnetic forces dominate, in addition to gravity. No major disagreement
between the advocates of the latter two theories existed, but both were at odds with the
proponents of the relativistic, or Big Bang, theories. Of interest is that the proponents
of the Steady State and Electric Universe included gravity in their hypotheses while
162 Energy & Environment · Vol. 20, No. 1&2, 2009

adherents of the relativistic theories deny electricity plays any part at all in the
universe, despite the fact that matter is comprised of electric charge.
Then on July 9, 1962, the United States detonated a nuclear device 400km above
Johnston Island in the North Pacific Ocean which produced a plasma whose initial
spherical shape striated within a few minutes to produce an artificial aurora.
Associated with the detonation was a deterioration of radio communication over a
wide area of the Pacific, lightning discharges, destruction of electronics in monitoring
satellites and an electromagnetic pulse which affected some power circuitry as far
away as Hawaii, some 1400 kilometres away. The event was noticed world wide as
the plasma formed at least two intense equatorial tubes, artificial Van Allen Belts,
around the Earth. These tubes, or plasma toroids, produced intense synchrotron
radiation that lasted far longer than expected, some 100 days, (Peratt 2003). Humanity,
unknowingly, has also viewed synchrotron radiation from the Crab Nebulae for
centuries - the only known mechanism that produces this radiation are electrons
spiralling about a magnetic field at nearly the speed of light, (Peratt, 2003). The
nuclear experiment suggested that there was more to the Earth’s electromagnetic
environment than first thought.
At present gravity is thought to be the only force operating between the Sun and
planets but there may well be electromagnetic effects that have powerful influences.
In particular the behavior of the Sun is thought to drive the Earth dynamics. However
there are signs that the gravitational cosmology of the Big Bang is in trouble. Dissident
scientists form the Alternative Cosmology Group that culminated in the publication of
an Open Letter on Cosmology published in New Scientist, May 22, 2004. This letter
points to fundamental problems with Big Bang Theory in which recent observations
contradict the theory’s predictions, especially when the Cold Dark Matter model began
to fail - only to worsen with the ad hoc addition of dark energy. A more detailed
summary of the present situation can be read at the Alternative Cosmology Groups
web site http://www.cosmology.info.
Is there an alternative to the Big Bang Theory? As Steady State theory has fallen by
the wayside, with its no less miraculous continuous creation of matter, only the ideas
of the Electric, or Plasma, Universe remain as a plausible alternative. This theory has
a long history stretching back to the nineteenth century when Norwegian physicist
Kristian Birkeland proposed from direct experimental evidence the polar auroras were
produced by charged particles from the Sun. He designed a magnetised sphere
suspended in a vacuum to experimentally model the electrical behaviour of the Earth
and from these “Terrella”, (little Earth) experiments discovered that the magnetic field
guides the charged particles to the magnetic poles producing rings of light that
appeared to mimic the Earth’s auroras. Birkeland’s ideas were dismissed at the time
but confirmation of his hypothesis came from observations made of the ionosphere by
satellites during the 1960’s and 70’s. We now know these electric currents, named
Birkeland currents in his honour, flow in and out of the Earth’s atmosphere at high
altitudes and have total magnitudes of millions of amperes (Peratt 2003).
According to Peratt, author of the text “The Physics of the Plasma Universe”,
“Plasma is overwhelmingly the dominant constituent of the Universe. Yet most people
are ignorant of plasmas. In daily life on the surface of planet Earth, perhaps the plasma
The Earth in an Electric Solar System 163

to which people are most commonly exposed is the one that produces the cool efficient
glow from fluorescent lights or the now ubiquitous plasma TV screens. Neither solid,
nor liquid, nor gas, plasma most closely resembles the latter, but unlike gases whose
particles are electrically neutral, plasma is composed of the building blocks of all
matter: electrically charged particles at high energy.”
Plasma consists of a percentage of ions and electrons, together with neutral atoms
and molecules. It is only when plasma is cooled that the atoms or molecules that are
so predominant in forming gases, liquids, and solids that we are accustomed to on
Earth, is possible. So, in space, plasma remains electrically conductive while quasi-
neutral in bulk. Plasmas carry electric currents and are more influenced by
electromagnetic forces than by gravitational forces. Outside the Earth’s atmosphere,
the dominant form of matter is plasma, and “empty” space has been found to be quite
“alive” with a constant flow of plasma and electric currents - signified by the
ubiquitous magnetic fields found in deep space.

2. SO WHAT IS PLASMA?
According to Scott, (2006), “When one or more of the outer (valence) electrons are
stripped away from an atom we say the atom has become “ionized”. It then exhibits
a net positive electrical charge, and is called a “positive ion”. On the other hand, if an
extra electron is added onto a neutral atom, the combination then carries a net negative
charge and is referred to as a “negative ion”. The electrical forces between dissimilar
ions are orders of magnitude stronger than any mechanical force such as that produced
by gravity. Electrical “plasma” is a cloud of ions and electrons that, under the
excitation of applied electrical and magnetic fields, can sometimes light up and behave
in some unusual ways. The most familiar examples of electrical plasmas are the neon
sign, lightning, and the electric arc welding machine. The ionosphere of Earth is an
example of plasma that does not emit visible light. Plasma permeates the space that
contains our solar system. The cloud of particles that constitutes the solar “wind” is
plasma. Our entire “Milky Way” galaxy consists mainly of plasma. In fact 99% of
the entire visible universe is matter in the plasma state.
The development of plasma, or electric universe, theory had its origin in the
pioneering work of Kristian Birkeland, who discovered the twisted corkscrew shaped
paths taken by electric currents in plasmas, which sometimes are visible and
sometimes not - depending on the strength of the current density being carried by the
plasma. The mysterious “sprites”, “elves”, and “blue jets” associated with electrical
storms on Earth are examples of Birkeland currents in the plasma of our upper
atmosphere, Figure 1.
In the early 20th century, Nobel laureate Irving Langmuir studied electric plasmas
in his laboratory at General Electric where he further developed the body of
knowledge Birkeland had initiated. It was Langmuir who first used the name
“plasma” to describe the almost lifelike, self-organizing behaviour of these ionized gas
clouds in the presence of electrical currents and magnetic fields.
Virtually all of modern plasma physics is indebted to Hannes Alfvén for his insights
into the role of electric and magnetic fields in plasma. In 1970 Alfvén received the
Nobel Prize for his discoveries in magnetohydrodynamics but used his acceptance
164 Energy & Environment · Vol. 20, No. 1&2, 2009

speech to beg scientists to ignore this earlier work, in which he proposed that magnetic
fields could be frozen into plasma, which was shown to be wrong. His plea was
ignored.

Figure 1. Atmospheric and ionospheric plasma phenomena

3. BASIC PROPERTIES OF ELECTRIC CURRENTS IN PLASMA

There are three distinctly different modes in which electric discharges in plasma can
operate:

3.1 Dark Current Mode

The density (Amps per square meter) of the electrical current (flow of charged
particles) within the plasma is very low. The plasma does not glow. It is essentially
invisible. We would not know the discharge was there at all unless we measured its
“wind” or magnetic field. A familiar example is an air ioniser where electrical
discharges occur preferentially from sharp points so that fine needles are used as
discharge points; hence a plasma discharge in air is detected as a breeze. The solar
wind is another example of plasma operating in the dark current mode.

3.2 Glow Mode

The density of the electrical current (flow of charged particles) is significant. The
entire plasma glows. The brightness of the glow depends on the intensity of the
current in the plasma. Examples: Any neon sign, emission nebulae, the Sun’s corona,
plasma TVs.
The Earth in an Electric Solar System 165

3.3 Arc Mode

The density of the electrical current in the plasma is very high. The plasma radiates
brilliantly over a wide electromagnetic spectrum. Current tends to form twisting
filaments. Examples of this mode of operation are: An electric arc welding machine,
lightning and the penumbral filaments seen in perspective in large Sunspots.
In all three modes of operation, plasmas emit measurable electromagnetic radiation
(radio frequency noise) which at any given time the current density (Amps per square
meter), existing in the plasma, determines which particular mode a plasma is operating
in. The atomic structure of the gas that became ionized to form the plasma in the first
place also is a factor in this.

3.4 Double Layers

One of the most important properties of any electrical plasma is its ability to “self-
organize” - that is, to electrically isolate one section of itself from another. The
isolating wall is called a double layer (DL). When plasma is studied in the lab, it is
usually contained in a closed cylindrical glass (Geissler) tube. Electrodes are inserted
into the ends of the tube - one electrode (called the anode) is maintained at a higher
voltage than the electrode at the other end (the cathode). If sufficient voltage
difference is applied, then ionization will be initiated and current will start to flow
through the plasma. Positive ions (atoms with one or more electrons stripped off) will
migrate away from the anode, and electrons will move toward the anode. The
mathematical sum of these two oppositely directed flows constitutes the total current
in the plasma.
If the voltage difference from one electrode to the other becomes large enough, a
DL will form in a narrow cross-section somewhere above the cathode. Almost all the
voltage drop that is applied across the electrodes will fall across this DL. The plasma
on one side of the DL (the side toward the anode) will have approximately the same
voltage as the anode. The plasma on the cathode side of the DL will have essentially
the same voltage as the cathode. The bulk of the plasma (called the positive column)
is electrically isolated from the cathode by the DL. The total electric current, however,
is the same throughout the plasma (on both sides of the DL). Plasmas are excellent,
but not perfect, conductors and, therefore, there will not be a significant voltage drop
across the extensive positive column. The DL “takes” most of any externally applied
voltage. In other words, the DL is where the strongest electric fields in the plasma will
be found.
If a foreign object is inserted into plasma, a DL will form around it, shielding it
electrically from the main plasma but this effect makes it difficult to insert voltage
sensing probes into plasma in order to measure the electric potential at a specific
location. This is a well known property of plasmas and various methods have been
developed in the laboratory to overcome it.
In space, it is impossible to “send a spacecraft to measure the voltage of the solar
plasma at some point”. Voltage is a relative measure (like velocity, for example) and
must be measured with respect to some datum. A spacecraft will start out having the
same voltage as the surface of Earth. As it penetrates the plasma-sphere and enters the
solar plasma it will slowly alter its charge and thus alter its voltage. The planets
166 Energy & Environment · Vol. 20, No. 1&2, 2009

occupy the positive column of the solar discharge so that the electric field is very weak
- only sufficient to cause a drift of electrons to the Sun and the acceleration of the solar
wind away from the Sun.

3.5 The Z-Pinch

Electric current, passing through plasma, will take on the corkscrew (spiral) shape
discovered by Birkeland and are comprised of a twisted pair of current filaments
aligned with the local ambient magnetic field. There is a tendency for interacting
Birkeland current pairs to compress between them any material (ionized or not) in the
plasma. This is called the “z-pinch” effect. The ability of Birkeland currents to accrete
and compress even non-ionized material is called “Marklund convection”.

3.6 Currents in Cosmic Sized Plasmas

Because plasmas are good (but not perfect) conductors, they are equivalent to metal
wires in their ability to carry electrical current. Any relative motion between cosmic
plasma cells of different densities, temperatures or magnetic field strength, will
generate electric currents. These currents will, in turn, produce their own magnetic
fields.

3.7 Scalability of Plasma Phenomena

Plasma phenomena are scalable. That is to say, their electrical and physical properties
remain the same, independent of the size of the plasma. Of course dynamic
phenomena take much less time to occur in small laboratory plasma than they do in
plasma the size, say, of a galaxy. But the phenomena are identical in that they obey the
same laws of physics. So we can make accurate models of cosmic sized plasmas in
the lab - and generate effects exactly like those seen in space. In fact, electric currents,
flowing in plasmas, have been shown to produce most of the observed astronomical
phenomena that are inexplicable if we assume that the only forces at work in the
cosmos are magnetism and gravity. According to Alfvén plasma phenomena can be
scaled up in three jumps of 109 magnitudes, though it would probably be a
combination of gravitational and electromagnetic forces which determine the large
structures and nuclear forces as the power supply of stars.

4. THE FORMATION OF GALAXIES IN COSMIC SIZED PLASMA

Dr. Anthony Peratt is a former Scientific Advisor to the United States Department of
Energy, Washington DC and a member of the Associate Laboratory Directorate of the
Los Alamos National Laboratory. He was a graduate student of Nobel Prize winner
Hannes Alfvén. He is a world renowned electrical engineer who first received notice
among the general public through the publication of his work involving
supercomputer simulation of galaxy formation in E. J. Lerner’s 1991 book “The Big
Bang Never Happened”. Peratt had worked on those simulations for several years
prior to that time. By 1986 he had achieved sufficient professional stature to be asked
to serve as Guest Editor of the Dec. 1986 IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science (Vol.
PS-14 No. 6). In that issue he published two articles: “Evolution of the Plasma
Universe: I. Double Radio Galaxies, Quasars, and Extragalactic Jets; II. The
The Earth in an Electric Solar System 167

Formation of Systems of Galaxies. He has served on the Administrative Committee

of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. In the issue of the IEEE
Transactions that Peratt edited there were two articles by his mentor, Hannes Alfvén.
There were other articles by the astronomer Halton Arp as well as many top plasma
scientists and engineers. It is a seminal publication that sets out the fundamental basis
of the Electrical/Plasma Universe. It is, for the most part, readable by any reasonably
informed layperson interested in astronomy. It should be available in the library of any
good college of engineering, (Scott 2006).
Peratt used a supercomputer to apply the Maxwell - Lorentz equations (the basic
laws governing the forces produced by, and the interactions between, electric and
magnetic fields) to each of a huge 3D ensemble of charged particles. He calls this
Particle in Cell (PIC) simulation and his results are almost indistinguishable from
astronomical images of actual galaxies.

Figure 2. PIC Simulations of Spiral Galaxies (Plasma bulge at the core removed for
clarity).

Figure 3. PIC simulated versus Observed Galaxy shapes

(It is pointed out that the PIC simulations shown above have had the large plasma
bulge, which occurs at the elliptical core at the geometrical centre of the simulation,
removed as it tends to obscure the coalesced region.)
Peratt went on to publish the text: “The Physics of the Plasma Universe” (Springer-
Verlag, 1992). It is an up-to-date presentation of the mathematical laws of physics that
govern the behaviour of plasmas and provides the fundamental argument for why
electrical effects cannot be ignored in any modern study of the cosmos.
168 Energy & Environment · Vol. 20, No. 1&2, 2009

Figure 4 Typical Spiral Galaxy

4.1 The Peratt Instabilities

One of Peratt’s latest and most important discovery’s are plasma instabilities and
named in his honour. These are observed dynamic effects that occur in intense
Birkeland currents or arc discharges found in plasma torches, z-pinched plasma
filaments, or in high energy density electrical discharges. The instability takes on the
shape of a column of axially symmetric toroids or spheroids that remain in a semi-
stable state until disruption. During this state the column may be a source of intense
x-rays whose intensity is greatly enhanced if two current filaments are in interaction.
The instability can also take on a sawtooth structure with a violent snaking motion as
found between the anode and cathode of a high power plasma torch or in high energy
density plasmas, Peratt et al, 1980.
There is an extensive website containing information for both the novice who
wants to learn about the Plasma Universe and the experienced investigator who wants
to download the seminal scientific papers that underpin all these ideas. It is a treasure
trove of interesting information about the electrical nature of our Universe and can be
accessed at the following web address: http://public.lanl.gov/alp/plasma/universe.html.

5. THE CONNECTION
5.1 The Sun
The Sun is an insignificant star in the Milky Way with its own solar system of which
the planet we live on is part. Many years ago Kristian Birkeland averred that

“According to our view of looking at the matter, every star in the universe would be
the seat and field of activity of electric forces of strength that no one could imagine”.
Birkeland thought that stars, and thus our Sun, were essentially electrical phenomena.
However the standard model of the Sun assumes that the energy source is internal
in which the Sun’s core is supposed to be a nuclear fusion reactor burning slowly out
over time but proponents of plasma theory, noting that observations fail to substantiate
this Standard Solar Model, think there might be a simpler explanation. However the
The Earth in an Electric Solar System 169

electric star hypothesis is by no means accepted and for the present all we can say
about the Sun is that is a complex body with a poorly understood structure. It is a body,
according to current theory, held together by gravitational forces with a nuclear power
source with complicated heat transfer mechanisms involving the flow of electrically
charged particles, probably responsible for the observed magnetic fields, currents
Sunspots and corona.
The standard solar model cannot explain, nor should expect, Sunspots. And the
measurement of the Sun’s temperature profile away from the photosphere completely
contradicts the nuclear fusion core assumption of a diminishing temperature with
increasing distance from the core. This temperature profile or gradient starts from the
insides of Sunspots which are at a lower temperature than the Suns’ surface, or
photosphere which is some 5,600 Kelvin; The solar temperature gradient then
decreases to about 5000 Kelvin at 600km above the Sun’s surface but strangely starts
to then increase to 10,000 Kelvin some 2000km above where a transition regions
occurs in which the temperature suddenly rises to 2 million Kelvin at base of the
corona and continues to rise with further distance from the Sun.
Just how a hot body like our Sun can have a temperature minimum just above its
photosphere is not easy for the standard fusion model to explain - but straightforward
for the electrical model. The solution to the problem is to realise that the Sun’s energy
source is external in the same way that the Earth’s similar atmospheric temperature
gradient is the result of an external energy source.

5.2 The Earth

The Earth can be considered an electrically charged sphere suspended in the plasma of
space. It is electrically isolated from its space environment by complex plasma double
layers, and the best electrical device which can serve as a model for this is a leaky
capacitor. In the Earth’s case the ionosphere is the positive electrode while the Earth
itself the negative electrode and the leakage of electric current between the Earth and
space appears as various forms of lightning and severe storms. There is also a strong
electric field within this double layer of at minimum 100 volts per linear metre
upwards. (This electric potential is maintained by the Earth and its immersion in the
highly active electric plasma of the solar system).
There is a continuous flow of electric current between the Earth and the Sun,
entering at the Polar Regions and then travelling over the ionosphere to return to the
Sun at the other pole. Usually this plasma current is in dark mode and is not visible
but when the solar electric currents do increase, spectacular visible aurora activity
occurs at the poles. As Peratt notes in a recent paper, these aurora polar currents, once
the subject of intense debate, are now recognised as Birkeland currents and are
routinely measured by today’s satellites having total magnitudes of millions of
amperes (Peratt, op. Cit). It is an energy source that is completely ignored in climate
studies.
Recently NASA has discovered via its THEMIS satellite that the Earth is connected
to the Sun by magnetic flux lines or ropes. Now anyone who has understood a little
about high school physics knows that only electric currents produce magnetic fields so
these magnetic flux ropes are in all likelihood twisting Birkeland currents connecting
170 Energy & Environment · Vol. 20, No. 1&2, 2009

the Earth and the Sun. I here quote the beginning of the NASA release of October 30,
2008, entitled “Magnetic Portals Connect Sun and Earth”:
During the time it takes you to read this article, something will happen high
overhead that until recently many scientists didn’t believe in. A magnetic portal will
open, linking Earth to the Sun 93 million miles away. Tons of high-energy particles
may flow through the opening before it closes again, around the time you reach the
end of the page. “It’s called a flux transfer event or ‘FTE’,” says space physicist
David Sibeck of the Goddard Space Flight Centre. “Ten years ago I was pretty sure
they didn’t exist, but now the evidence is incontrovertible.” Indeed, today Sibeck is
telling an international assembly of space physicists at the 2008 Plasma Workshop in
Huntsville, Alabama, that FTEs are not just common, but possibly twice as common as
anyone had ever imagined.
They say it is good to have powerful friends!

6. EVIDENCE FOR A SUN - EARTH CONNECTION

Ever since the advent of the modern industrial age electrical engineers have noted
unexpected behaviour in the various engineered systems humanity uses whether on
land, in the oceans and in space. Satellite failure, cell-phone dropouts, and power
utility failures are some of the more common examples identified. Electrical
engineers have now established that these disruptions are due to Solar factors in which
at least 10,000 have so far been identified some five AU (astronomical units) from the
Earth by the Ulysses spacecraft. “These modes couple the magnetosphere, the
ionosphere, the geomagnetic field and atmospheric pressure. Estimates of the power
spectrum of data from solar radio telescopes and induced voltages on ocean cables
show what appear to be solar modes at both lower and higher frequencies than the
optically measured solar p-modes. Most surprisingly these modes are easily detected
in seismic data, where they literally shake the Earth”, (Thomson et al. 2007).

6.1 Seismic Data

It is generally thought that the low frequency background signals, the well known
seismic hum, in seismic data could be attributed to ocean waves but Thomson et al (op
cit) point out that this hypothesis cannot explain the observed high Q-peaks and
obvious solar modes. However the oceanic source hypothesis is supported by some
good correlations between the amplitude of the seismic hum and wave height, possibly
implying that space weather drives ordinary weather (Thomson et al, Op cit, pp.1122).
Electric-plasma-universe theory regards Earth’s weather as the physical behaviour of
the interface between the Earth and its space environment via plasma interactions; and
hence, it is not surprising that space weather could drive the Earth’s weather.

6.2 Hurricanes, Cyclones and Dust Devils.

If we compare Peratt’s simulations above with spiral galaxies on one scale, and
hurricanes or cyclones on the smaller Earthly scale, then the similarities suggest a
common mechanism. In the computer simulations Birkeland currents generate rotating
spiral galaxies in the plasma of space. That is, it’s the electrical currents which are
The Earth in an Electric Solar System 171

thought to help produce the spiral shapes, in addition to gravity, so spiral galaxies
might be explained in terms of Faraday or homopolar motor mechanism, Figure 5.

Figure 5 Planetary Homopolar Motor

On a more local scale we know tropical hurricanes or cyclones start over slightly
warmer oceans, to rapidly develop into life threatening storms, often causing immense
destruction on landfall. Airborne electric field measurements over some hurricanes
have produced electric fields of over 10,000 volts/metre but it is generally assumed
that it is the rotation of the air masses which created these enormous electric fields.
However there is one problem - no one has created electricity, and thus electric fields,
from spinning air experimentally, so the conclusion that hurricanes produce electric
fields from their cyclonic motion is, in all likelihood, wrong. Rather it is more likely
that electric currents might be the driving forces for hurricanes, cyclones and
typhoons, imparting the circular or vortex motion.
Another unusual weather phenomenon is the tornado - and the modern
“explanation” for the formation of tornadoes can be summarized as follows, from a
National Weather Service publication.
Stage 1: Before thunderstorms develop, a change in wind direction and an increase
in wind speed with increasing height create an invisible, horizontal spinning effect in
the lower atmosphere.
172 Energy & Environment · Vol. 20, No. 1&2, 2009

Figure 6. Stage 1

Stage 2: Rising air within the thunderstorm updraft tilts the rotating air from
horizontal to vertical.

Figure 7. Stage 2

Stage 3: An area of rotation, 2-6 miles wide, now extends through much of the
storm. Most strong and violent tornadoes form within this area of strong rotation.

Figure 8. Stage 3

There is a small problem in moving from stage 2 in which there is no rotation, to

stage 3 where there is. The standard model for hurricane generation suffers from the
same problem - the almost miraculous transfer from an absence of cyclonic motion at
the sea surface, to the cyclonic motion characteristic of hurricanes.
On an even smaller scale dust devils or willy-willies, are now known to exhibit
strong electric fields in excess of 10,000 volts per meter and generate magnetic fields
as well, (Renno et al, al, 2005). Since magnetic fields can only be produced by electric
currents, it seems that small scale twisting Birkeland currents operating in dark plasma
mode are the electrical engines driving the Earthly dust devils. A similar driving force,
but at a larger scale, could be driving the tropical cyclones and hurricanes,
(http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2006/09jan_electrichurricanes.htm).
The Earth in an Electric Solar System 173

Figure 9. Willy Willy

Figure 10. Hurricane Kate

6.3 The Invisible Plasma Tourus

Both the Earth and Sun have an electromagnetic torus around their equatorial regions
not evident in the visible spectrum. The SOHO probes imaged the solar torus in the
UV spectrum, shown below and the similarity with the experimentally produced torus
in Birkeland’s Terella experiments suggests a similar mechanism - that not only the
Earth but also the Sun are powered by external energy sources. If this is so, then the
Sunspot cycle may have a far more fundamental explanation than the present one that
relies on some ad hoc esoteric behaviour of a fusion powered Sun.
174 Energy & Environment · Vol. 20, No. 1&2, 2009

Figure 11. SOHO UV imaging of solar torus

The left image is a side view of the Sun, while the right a polar one in UV from the
SOHO probe (The Earthly equivalent are the Van Allen Belts).
Kristian Birkeland’s observations from his Terrella Experiments, in which he
generated electrical discharges to a magnetised metallic sphere in a vacuum from the
EM torus encircling the terella, showed that increasing the current caused the
discharges from the torus to the terella to move latitudinally up and down from its
equator, much like spots on the Sun and hurricanes, cyclones or typhoons on Earth.
Would this mean that these enormous destructive storms are generated by electric
currents entering around the Earth’s equatorial regions rather than from thermal
warming of the Earth’s oceanic surfaces by solar radiation combined with the coriolis
force?

Figure 12. Kristian Birkeland (left) with his Terella Experiment (insert shows the
Sunspot development on the model, left and actual in UV, right)

7. CONCLUSION
This article is of necessity brief and could not hope to summarise all that we do know,
and the far greater domain of what we don’t know about the behaviour of the Plasma
Universe and the Earth’s role in it. It is reasonably clear that the geophysical
behaviour of the Earth can no longer be viewed in isolation from the rest of the solar
system, and by implication, the universe if, as the theory of the plasma universe
The Earth in an Electric Solar System 175

suggest, we live in an interconnected electric, or plasma universe. If the Earth is

indeed part, along with the Sun and other planets in the solar system, of an enormous
galactic electrical circuit, then the outstanding puzzles of modern geophysical and
weather phenomena may have simpler explanations than hitherto considered.
The striking similarities in behaviour between solar sunspots and earthly hurricanes
or cyclones, suggests a common mechanism. The idea of space weather driving Earth
weather, as evidenced from the data by Thomson et al, points to the real possibility the
Earth’s weather, the physical behaviour of its interface with the plasma of space, is
driven externally not only by the Sun, but from other electrical inputs only now being
identified from in situ measurements of space probes in the near Earth environment,
and from in situ measurements on the Earth.
The Sun does drive the Earth and not in the way most of us have been taught, but
from the modern principles of the physics of the Plasma Universe in which in the
beginning was the plasma.

REFERENCES
Peratt, Anthony L., Fellow, IEEE, 2003, Characteristics for the Occurrence of a High-Current,
Z-Pinch Aurora as Recorded in Antiquity, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, pp. 1192-
1214, Vol. 31. No. 6, December
Anthony L. Peratt, Fellow, IEEE, 1991, The Physics of the Plasma Universe, Springer-Verlag.
Peratt A. L, Green, J, and Nielsen, D, 1980, Evolution of Colliding Plasmas, Physical Review
Letters, 44, pp. 1767-1770.
Renno N., Atreya S., Koch J., and Yana C., 2005, Electric Dust Devils and Dust Storms,
Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 7, 02197.
Scott, Donald E., 2006, The Electric Sky, Mikamar Publishing, Portland Oregon.
Thomson David J., Fellow IEEE, Lanzerotti Louis J., Fellow IEEE, Vernon, III, Frank L.,
Lessard Marc R., and Smith Lindsay T. P.,2007, Solar Modal Structure of the Engineering
Environment, Proceedings of the IEEE , pp 1085-1132, Vol. 95, No. 5.