Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 19 views

    S2-Rubric For Speaking Assignment

    Uploaded by

    anis munfarikhatin
    The document is a rubric for evaluating speaking tasks that demonstrates understanding of building effective arguments. It evaluates participants on their knowledge and understanding of the topic, analytical thinking, organization of the presentation, and use of language. For each category, it provides descriptors to assess performance as poor, not yet meeting expectations, good, or very good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    S2-Rubric For Speaking Assignment

    Uploaded by

    anis munfarikhatin
    19 views1 page
    The document is a rubric for evaluating speaking tasks that demonstrates understanding of building effective arguments. It evaluates participants on their knowledge and understanding of the topic, analytical thinking, organization of the presentation, and use of language. For each category, it provides descriptors to assess performance as poor, not yet meeting expectations, good, or very good.

    Original Description:

    Speaking rubric

    Original Title

    S2-Rubric for Speaking Assignment

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document is a rubric for evaluating speaking tasks that demonstrates understanding of building effective arguments. It evaluates participants on their knowledge and understanding of the topic, analytical thinking, organization of the presentation, and use of language. For each category, it provides descriptors to assess performance as poor, not yet meeting expectations, good, or very good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    19 views1 page

    S2-Rubric For Speaking Assignment

    Uploaded by

    anis munfarikhatin
    The document is a rubric for evaluating speaking tasks that demonstrates understanding of building effective arguments. It evaluates participants on their knowledge and understanding of the topic, analytical thinking, organization of the presentation, and use of language. For each category, it provides descriptors to assess performance as poor, not yet meeting expectations, good, or very good.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 1

    Session 2 S p e a k i n g Ta s k Ru b r i c

    TASK: to demonstrate your understanding of the 7 blocks of building effective arguments by applying them
    to the topic of your own personal essay for university admission.

    Batch: Name:

    KNOWLEDGE & UNDERSTANDING • To what extent does the course participant show
    knowledge and understanding of the CTS issues?
    • Are the ideas supported by well-chosen references?

    Poor Not yet Good Very good


    • The course participant shows • The course participant shows • The course participant shows a • The course participant shows a very
    limited knowledge and little adequate knowledge and good knowledge and good knowledge and understanding.
    understanding. understanding. understanding.
    • Ideas are supported by references.
    • Ideas are rarely supported by • Ideas are occasionally supported by • Ideas are generally supported by
    references. references. references.

    A N A LY T I C A L T H I N K I N G • To what extent does the course participant show an


    understanding of how CTS are applied to understand argument?

    Poor Not yet Good Very good

    • The course participant shows a • The course participant shows an The course participant shows a good • The course participant shows a very good
    limited understanding of how CTS adequate understanding of how CTS understanding of how CTS are understanding of how CTS are applied to
    are applied to understand are applied to understand applied to understand arguments. understand arguments.
    arguments. arguments.

    O R G A N I Z AT I O N • How well is the oral presentation organized?


    • How coherent is the structure?

    Poor Not yet Good Very good


    • The presentation shows limited • The presentation shows adequate • The presentation shows good • The presentation shows very good
    organization and has little organization. The structure is generally organization. The structure is organization. The structure is
    structure. coherent. coherent. coherent and effective.
    • The visual aid helps little in • The visual aid somewhat helps to • The visual aid helps to organize • The visual aid helps to organize the
    organizing the presentation. organize the presentation. the presentation. presentation and is effective in conveying
    the intended message.

    LANGUAGE • How effective, appropriate and accurate is the language?


    • To what extent does the course participant use eye contact, gestures and voice
    inflection to convey the intended message?

    Poor Not yet Good Very good

    • The register, style and language • The register, style and language choice • The register, style and language • The register, style and language choice
    choice are sometimes clear and are mostly clear and appropriate, with choice are clear and appropriate, are very clear and appropriate, with a
    appropriate. Grammar and sentence an adequate degree of accuracy in with a good degree of accuracy in very good degree of accuracy in grammar
    construction are sometimes accurate, grammar and sentence construction. grammar and sentence construction. and sentence construction.
    errors and inconsistencies are
    • As appropriate for the chosen oral • As appropriate for the chosen oral • As appropriate for the chosen oral
    apparent.
    presentation, the course participant presentation, the course presentation, the course participant uses
    • The course participant rarely uses uses mostly adequate eye contact, participant uses good eye contact, very good eye contact, gestures and
    eye contact, gestures, or voice gestures and voice inflection. gestures and voice inflection. voice inflection to engage the audience.
    inflection.

    October 2021

    You might also like