Follow-Up of High Risk Neonates
Follow-Up of High Risk Neonates
Follow-Up of High Risk Neonates
net/publication/5320593
CITATIONS READS
15 3,358
6 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Savita Sapra on 17 April 2015.
Abstract
The improvement in perinatal care has led to increase in survival as well as morbidity in
sick newborns. These babies need to be followed up regularly to assess growth and
neurodevelopmental outcome and for early stimulation and rehabilitation. We present a
protocol describing the various components of a follow up program including setting up
of follow up services, procedures and timings of follow up.
Introduction
Improving perinatal and neonatal care has led to increased survival of infants who are
at-risk for long-term morbidities such as developmental delay and visual/hearing
1, 2
problems Moreover, many of these neonates (e.g. extremely low birth weight infants)
tend to have higher incidence of growth failure and ongoing medical illnesses A proper
and appropriate follow-up program would help in early detection
of these problems thus paving way for early intervention.
Numerous studies have shown that despite substantial improvements in the neonatal
mortality, the incidence of chronic morbidities and adverse outcomes among survivors
has not declined much.3 This highlights the need for a follow-up care service that would
ensure systematic monitoring of the general health and neurodevelopmental outcomes
after discharge from the hospital. The monitoring would help the infants and their
families (early identification of problems and hence early rehabilitation services) as well
as the physicians involved in their care (to improve the quality of care provided and for
research purposes). There is a common perception that high risk follow-up mainly
concerns with detection and management of neurosensory disability. Infact growth
failure and ongoing illnesses are equally , if not more important issues in high risk follow-
up. Adequate emphasis must be placed on these .
However, a rigorous follow-up of all the neonates discharged from a particular health
facility would neither be practical nor feasible. Therefore, it is important to select a cohort
of neonates who are at a higher risk of developing these adverse outcomes – ‘at-risk’
infants. Surprisingly, there are no standardized guidelines for follow up of high risk
infants even in tertiary care centers4. We have devised a follow up protocol which
identifies the subset of neonates to be followed up and outlines the optimal time for
follow-up visits and the appropriate assessment measures to be adopted .
Table 1: Personnel required for follow-up program and their individual roles
7. Medical social worker • To take care of the social issues to help improve
follow up rates
therapist
Ideally, all the required personnel should be available under one roof at a place
earmarked for follow-up care. If this is not feasible, at least the services of pediatrician,
clinical psychologist, dietician, medical social worker, and physiotherapist should be
ensured in the follow-up clinic. Medical social worker is an important member of the
team liasoning with the family and helps them to keep follow up visits. Infants who need
hearing/visual assessment or speech therapy can be referred to the concerned specialist
on fixed days.
Selection of high-risk infants should be based on the gestational age, birth weight,
occurrence and severity of perinatal/neonatal illnesses, interventions received in the
neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), presence of malformations, etc. It can further be
modified for each unit based on their admission and outcome profiles.
Panel 1 lists the cohort of high risk infants whom we follow-up in our unit.
Panel 1: High risk neonates who need follow-up care (customize as per policy)
The developing brain of premature babies is extremely vulnerable to injury; the risk for
neurodevelopmental deficit increases with decreasing gestational age and birth weight
resulting in relatively high risk of cerebral palsy, developmental delay, hearing and vision
impairment and subnormal academic achievement 5. Similarly, small for date infants
(birth weight < 3rd centile) are also at significant risk of poor long term outcomes. Those
who required mechanical ventilation for more than 24hours, babies with metabolic
problems – symptomatic hypoglycemia as half of them have abnormal
neurodevelopmental outcome, symptomatic hypocalcemia, birth asphyxia Apgar score 3
or less at 5 min, abnormal neurological examination at discharge, seizures,
hyperbilirubinemia > 20mg/dL or requirement of exchange transfusion, Rh hemolytic
disease of newborn as they have anemia presenting till three to six months age,
infections – culture positive sepsis or meningitis, babies born to HIV infected mothers,
twin with intrauterine death of co-twin due to increased incidence of cerebral venous
thromboembolic phenomenon, twin to twin transfusion or major malformation. All infants
cared for in the NICU should have periodic preventive assessment by their primary care
physicians which should include regular assessment of growth, sensory function,
behavior and neurodevelopment. Infants with suspect findings should be referred for
more comprehensive evaluation to a center with experience in follow up of high risk
neonates.
To ensure proper follow-up of the high risk infants, parents (especially mother) and other
family members should be counseled even before discharge from the hospital.
Discharge should be planned well in advance so that the mother can be counseled
adequately.
Discharge planning: Discharge planning should ideally begin as soon as the baby is
admitted in the nursery. This gives adequate time for the caretakers to ask questions
and practice skills. The following criteria should be fulfilled before discharging a high risk
infant:
• Hemodynamically stable; able to maintain body temperature in open crib
• On full enteral feeds (either breast feeding or by paladai/spoon)
• Parents confident enough to take care of the baby at home
• Has crossed birth weight and showing a stable weight gain for at least three
consecutive days; in case of very low birth weight infants, weight should be at
least 1400 grams before considering for discharge.
• Not on any medications (except for vitamins and iron supplementation). Ideally
preterm babies on theophylline therapy for apnea of prematurity should be off
therapy for at least five days to make sure that there is no recurrence.
• Received vaccination as per schedule (based on postnatal age).
These criteria can be individualized to meet the infant and family needs.
Counseling prior to discharge: Counseling plays an important role in the care of these
babies at home; regular counseling sessions should be done before discharge. Parents
should be given advice regarding:
• Temperature regulation – proper clothing, cap, socks, Kangaroo mother care
etc.
• Feeding – type and amount of milk, method of administration, and nutritional
supplementation, if any.
• Prevention of infections – hand washing, avoidance of visitors, etc.
• Follow-up visits – where and when (Table I)
• Danger signs – recognition and where to report if signs are present
• Vaccination – schedule, next visit, etc.
• If possible the family should be provided with the telephone number of the health
care provider e.g. on-duty doctor in case the family needs to consult for infant’s
illness.
Venue: A specified site should be earmarked for follow up services. The parents should
be properly communicated about the venue and it should also be mentioned in the
discharge summary. Registration procedure at the follow-up clinic should be simplified to
avoid any undue delay. Ongoing illness is common problem among these infants. If the
infant develops any illness requiring admission, priority should be given for the same.
Record maintenance: There should be a separate but uniform file for each high risk
infant . We have separate files for male and female babies. Male babies get blue and
female babies get pink files. Addresses and telephone numbers should be entered
clearly in the file. If possible, an alternate address and telephone number should also be
recorded. It may be good idea to enquire an important landmark for locating the house in
case one needs to make a home visit. The family should also be given a booklet
containing follow-up information.
Schedule: The follow up schedule should be explained to the parents (see below).
Timings should be fixed and adhoc visits should be discouraged.
Corrected age: Age of the child since the expected date of delivery. The correction for
gestational immaturity at birth should be done till 24 months age. All developmental
milestones are assessed according to corrected age to compensate for the prematurity.
The addition of complementary feeds is also according to corrected age.
Postnatal age: Age of the child since birth. Immunization is done according to postnatal
age.
When to follow up
For the purpose of follow-up visits, at-risk infants can be grouped under two major
categories: (1) preterm/LBW infants and (2) infants with other conditions. The follow-up
schedule for both these categories has been summarized in Table II. This schedule
represents minimum number of visits of high risk neonates. If the baby has ongoing
issues or illness, more frequent visits are recommended. Please note that first contact of
the infant with the health providers after discharge is important and helps in identification
of adjustment problems at home. Ideally this contact should be achieved by the home
visit.
1. Infants with <1800g birth • After 3-7 days of discharge to check if the baby has been
weight and/or gestation adjusted well in the home environment. Every 2 weeks
<35 weeks until a weight of 3 kg (immunization schedule until 10-14
weeks to be covered in these visits)
• At 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18months of corrected age and then
every 6 months until age of 8years
Some neurological abnormalities that are identified in the first year of life are transient or
improve whereas findings in other children may worsen over time.7 By 12 months
corrected age the cognitive and language assessment can be done. By 18-24 months
corrected age there is improved prediction to early school age performance.8, 9, 10
The
importance of long term follow up lies in the fact that minor neurological disabilities may
not be detected early and become apparent only with increasing age. Standard follow-up
for many multicenter networks is currently at 18-24 months corrected age.
12 months, most children can eat the same types of food as the rest of the family.
The major problem with the family food is that it is not nutrient-rich11.
Infants who lag behind in any domain should undergo a formal developmental
evaluation by a clinical psychologist using tests such as Developmental assessment
of Indian Infant II (DASII II)13. This scale consists of 67 items for assessment of motor
development and 163 items for assessment of mental development. Motor scale
assesses control of gross and fine motor muscle groups. Mental scale assesses
cognitive, personal and social skills development. Both mental development index
and psychomotor development index can be calculated by DASII. The age
placement of the item at the total score rank of the scale is noted as the child
developmental age. This converts the child total scores to his motor age (MoA) and
mental age(MeA). The respective ages are used to calculate his motor and mental
development quotients respectively by comparing them with his chronological age
and multiplying it by 100. (DMoQ = MoA/CA x 100 and DMeQ = MeA/CA x 100).
The composite DQ is derived as an average of DMoQ and DMeQ.
The Vineland Social Maturity Scale measures social competence, self-help skills,
and adaptive behavior from infancy to adulthood. The Vineland scale consists of a
117-item interview with a parent or other primary caregiver.
midline
4-6 70˚ -110˚ 90˚ -120˚ 60˚ -70˚ Elbow crosses midline
7-9 110˚ -140˚ 110˚ -160˚ 60˚ -70˚ Elbow goes beyond
axillary line
10-12 140˚ -160˚ 150˚ -170˚ 60˚ -70˚
Truncal extensor hypertonia: there is a tendency of body to go into
hyperextension or opisthotonus.
Quadriplegia- Paresis of all four limbs with upper limb involvement equal to or
more than lower limbs.
Eye evaluation: The check-up for retinopathy of prematurity starts in the NICU and
continues till 44 weeks postconceptional age or till the retinal vessels have matured.
Refer to protocol on Retinopathy of prematurity14 .
At 9 months corrected age the ophthalmologist should evaluate the baby for vision,
squint, cataract and optic atrophy. Subjective visual assessment can be made from
clinical clues as inability to fixate eyes, roving eye movements and nystagmus.
Objective visual assessment should be done with the Teller Acuity Card. It has
seventeen 25.5 × 51 cm cards. Fifteen of these contain 12.5 × 12.5 cm patches of
square-wave gratings( vertical black and white strips) ranging in spatial frequency
from 38.0 cycles/cm to 0.32 cycles/cm. The range is in half octave steps. A cycle
consists of one black and one white stripe and an octave is a halving or doubling of
spatial frequency. In Snellens terms it is an halving or doubling of the denominator
e.g. 6/6, 612, 6/24. Half octave steps would be 6/6, 6/9, 6/12, 6/18, 6/24 and so on.
There is a low vision card containing 25.5 × 23 cm patch of 0.23 cm cycle/cm( 2.2
cm wide black or white stripes). The seventeenth card is a blank grey card with no
grating pattern. The gratings have 82 – 84% contrast and are matched to the
surrounding grey card to within 1% in space average luminance. This minimizes the
chance of a patient fixating because of brightness difference. Detection of pattern
alone determines the fixating preference. Proper illumination without any shadows
should be ensured (10 candelas /sqm). Testing distance from patient’s eyes to the
cards should be maintained constant as it determines the visual acuity. Children from
7m to 3y should be tested at 55 cm and later at 84 cm.
Rehabilitation for visual impairment should be early so that the child gets appropriate
stimulation. If delayed the restoration of the vision may not be possible because of
continuous sensory deprivation of the optic nerve. The child should be provided with
glasses or corrective surgery as appropriate. It should be emphasized that a good
high risk follow up program does not only pick up handicaps early but also ensures
early corrective measures and rehabilitation. This emphasizes the multidisciplinary
and well coordinated approach to such babies
The severity of hearing loss is profound (70 dB or more of hearing loss), severe (50
dB - 70 dB), moderate (30 dB - 50 dB) and mild (15 dB - 30 dB).
The audiological testing should be done at 3 months of age. Infants with true hearing
loss should be referred for early intervention to enhance the child’s acquisition of
developmentally appropriate language skills. The child should be provided with
hearing aids and if severe to profound hearing loss cochlear implants should be
considered by 12 months age. Fitting of hearing aids by the age of 6 months has
been associated with improved speech outcome. Initiation of early intervention
services before three months age has been associated with improved cognitive
development at 3years age15
Early stimulation
The high risk baby requires more attention of the family members. Parents and
family members need to aid the development process in an age appropriate way
spending quality time with children. Such interactions improve parent child
relationship and bring about positive parental attitudinal change. Effective
parents supervise their children in an age appropriate way, use consistent
positive discipline, communicate clearly and supportively, and show warmth,
affection, encouragement, and approval. The actions of the child should be
appreciated. This makes him happy and encourages doing more activities.
0-2 months:
Activities
• Maintain eye to eye contact
• Talk and sing to the baby while bathing, dressing and feeding
• Help the baby to turn his head to sound and light
Auditory
• Provide different sounds to the child like rattle, bell, squeezing a toy.
Make the child listen to music, high pitched and low pitched human
sounds
• Humming in a soft low voice
Visual
• Keep the baby in a well lighted room
• Shine mobile, color balls and hang bright clothes
Tactile
• Put the baby on different surfaces like soft clothes, mattresses, rubber mat
and mother’s lap
• Change the child’s position frequently like putting on his back, sides and
tummy
Kinesthetic
• Support the head and gently rock the child avoiding sudden jerky
movements
2-4 months
General stimulation
• Hold the baby at the shoulder
• Place things just out of the reach of the baby. Stimulate him to reach out
and grasp the object
Auditory
• Give sound producing toys
• Talk to the child more frequently
• Point out the names of objects shown to the child
Visual
• Hang bright objects about 30cm above the crib
• Maintain eye contact while talking to the child
Tactile
• Give the child paper to crumble and things to bite and suck
• Place the child on a rubber mat on the ground allowing him to move freely
4-6 months:
General activities:
• Sit the baby in the mother’s lap and ask her to gently bounce her knees
singing songs.
• Place the child flat on the back on the ground over a soft surface. Show
him a colorful toy. Slowly turn him by flexing the far away leg. Assist him to
turn over the tummy.
• Show an attractive toy and encourage the child to reach out to it.
• Put your hands under the child’s feet and move his legs up and down like
pedaling a cycle.
Auditory
• Shake a bell or a squeaky toy over the head of the baby. Encourage him
to turn his head and locate the sound
6-8 months:
• Call the child by his name
• Make the child sit as long as possible. Give support to his pelvis.
• Give him pieces of paper to tear
• Encourage him to roll over his tummy by showing him colorful toys on one
side.
8-10 months:
• Make the child stand by holding onto the furniture
• Encourage the child to clap hands
• Give him a small container and ask to drop small thing into it.
• Encourage him to produce monosyllables.
• Show him picture books and assist to turn the pages.
10-12 months:
• Let the child play with other children
• Name the body parts while bathing him
• Take the child on a walk and show him different animals and birds
References
1. Narayan S, Aggarwal R, Upadhyay A, Deorari AK, Singh M, Paul VK. Survival and morbidity in
Extremely Low Birth Weight (ELBW) infants. Indian Pediatr 2003; 40: 130-135.
3. Escobar G, Littenberg B, Petitti DB Outcome among surviving very low birthweight infants: a meta-
analysis. Arch Dis Child Feb1991; 66: 204 - 211.
4. Wang CJ, McGlynn EA, Brook RH, et al. Quality-of-care indicators for the neuro-developmental follow-
up of very low birth weight children: results of an expert panel process. Pediatrics. 2006; 117(6):2080 –
2092.
5. Vohr BR, Wright L, Anna M, Perritt R, Poole WK, Tyson JE, et al. Center for the Neonatal Research
Network Center differences and outcomes of exteremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics
2004:113:781-789.
6. Chaudhari S, Bhalerao M, Chitale A, Pandit A, Nene U. Pune Low Birth Weight Study - A Six Year
Follow Up. Indian Pediatr1999; 36:669-676.
7. Drillien C. Abnormal neurological signs in the first year of life in low birth weight infants: possible
prognostic significance. Dev Med Child Neurol 1997; 14:575-84.
8. Weisglas-Kuperus N, Baerts W, Smrkovsky M, Sauer PJ. Effects of biological and social factors on the
cognitive development of very low birth weight children. Pediatrics.1993; 92:658 –665.
9. Dezoete JA, MacArthur BA, Tuck B. Prediction of Bayley and Stanford-Binet scores with a group of very
low birthweight children. Child Care Health Dev.2003; 29:367 –372.
10. Lee H, Barratt MS. Cognitive development of preterm low birth weight children at 5 to 8 years old. J Dev
Behav Pediatr.1993; 14:242 –249.
11. Report of the global consultation, and summary of guiding principles for complementary feeding of the
breastfed child Authors: World Health Organization
12. Implementation of the WHO Multicenter Growth Reference Study in India —N. Bhandari, S. Taneja, T.
Rongsen, J. Chetia, P. Sharma, R. Bahl, D. K. Kashyap, and M. K. Bhan, for the WHO Multicenter
Growth Reference Study Group
13. Phatak B. Mental and motor growth of Indian babies (1-30 months). Final report. Department of Child
14. Chawla D, Agarwal R., Deorari AK, Paul VK. Retinopathy of Prematurity. Indian Journal of Pediatrics
2008;75(1):73-76
15. NIH Joint Committee on Infant Hearing. Year 2000 position statement: Principles and guidelines for
early hearing detection and intervention programmes. Pediatrics 2000; 106:798-817.
Adductor
Scarf sign angle
Dorsiflexion Popliteal
angle angle