Critical Literacy in A Digital World
Critical Literacy in A Digital World
Critical Literacy in A Digital World
In our work with primary schools one of the most popular NewsWise activities
is a fake or real quiz – a selection of unlikely or surprising headlines and
pictures designed to show that it can be difficult to tell at first glance whether
or not a story is true. Gut reactions from the children can be telling: “But I just
don’t believe it!”; “But look at the picture, it must be real!”. Even when
presented with evidence, they find it difficult to concede that their first instinct
was incorrect.
It’s hard to be told that you’re wrong. Especially if you have strong feelings or
emotions about a subject. And often that is exactly what fake news and biased,
slanted writing is designed to provoke; getting a reaction is the goal. Most of
us are guilty of reacting to a post on social media without properly
interrogating it. An example I love to use is the “baby platypus” picture that
went viral on Twitter earlier this year. In fact the photo showed a sculpture
that didn’t bear much resemblance to an actual baby platypus, but it was
shared thousands of times as if it were the real thing. A key tweet came from
an account who was clearly an expert on knitting (as you could see from their
previous posts), but not wildlife. That alone should have been enough to make
people pause, but it didn’t stop tens of thousands of people liking and sharing
their post.
It’s a great example of that classic of digital literacy: “why you shouldn’t trust
pictures on the internet”. It is often the presence of a picture that is most likely
to convince children that a news story is true. But of course, just like written
information, sometimes things appear bigger or more significant than they
really are or are misrepresented entirely. You shouldn’t accept either pictures
or text at face value. Many children are familiar with the idea of Photoshop,
but explaining other ways that photos can be manipulated such as
miscaptioning and forced perspective can be both enlightening and engaging.
I’ve had huge fun working with families to create a forced perspective photo
and then explain how it was done, ensuring that they don’t fall for the same in
the future.
A miscaptioned picture of a baby animal is a fairly benign example of fake
news, but the threat of Covid-19 has brought the real-life dangers of
misinformation into sharper relief and shown it’s more crucial than ever that
we equip young people with the critical skills to judge what is trustworthy.
NewsWise navigator
Read more
We developed a simple code for navigating news and online information: Stop.
Question. Check. Decide. Stop before you react, believe or share. Question:
Where did this information come from? Who shared it? Who wrote it? Have I
heard of them before? Are they a known news source? Are they an expert in
this area? Check if the source looks right and whether the information has
been shared by any other trustworthy sources, and only then decide whether
to believe and share it or tell people that it is not true! It is the questioning
that is key to developing critical skills. Being active, engaged and curious
rather than passively accepting information.
Turn children into fake news detectives and active critical questioning
becomes a game. The context of news also allows you to explore consequences
of misinformation that are easy to relate to: How would you feel if there was a
hurricane in your neighbourhood? And then what if you saw a picture showing
a shark swimming down the street? How might that affect your feelings and
your actions?
The exams chaos over the summer also dramatically demonstrated how
algorithms, AI and machine learning are now not only part of everyday life,
but their use can have potentially life-changing consequences. Introducing
younger children to these complex concepts is valuable and powerful,
especially when coupled with critical questioning: Why has this video been
suggested to me? Who does this benefit? Why are my search results different
from my friend’s? Am I missing out on information? What if I only see
information from one source or perspective? What if something misleading is
extremely popular? What if machine learning reinforces bias?
There are lots of technological solutions being developed to tackle fake news;
apps and browser extensions that use AI and machine learning to recognise
fake news and alert you when something is suspect: these can undoubtedly be
useful tools but on their own they do not teach anyone the skills to be
confident, discerning consumers themselves; to distinguish between fact and
opinion, identify bias and to question: who is represented in this report? Who
is missing? Why does this matter?
https://www.theguardian.com/newswise/2020/nov/02/critical-literacy-in-a-digital-world