The document is a survey questionnaire that is gathering feedback from respondents on the existing manual faculty loading system and ideas for improving a new computerized system. It collects basic profile information from respondents and asks them to evaluate the current system in areas like efficiency, accuracy, and report generation. Respondents are also asked to rate common problems of the manual system like time consumption and schedule conflicts. Finally, it asks for recommendations on features of a new computerized system like increased search speeds and security, and suggestions to improve the scheduling and loading process overall.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document is a survey questionnaire that is gathering feedback from respondents on the existing manual faculty loading system and ideas for improving a new computerized system. It collects basic profile information from respondents and asks them to evaluate the current system in areas like efficiency, accuracy, and report generation. Respondents are also asked to rate common problems of the manual system like time consumption and schedule conflicts. Finally, it asks for recommendations on features of a new computerized system like increased search speeds and security, and suggestions to improve the scheduling and loading process overall.
The document is a survey questionnaire that is gathering feedback from respondents on the existing manual faculty loading system and ideas for improving a new computerized system. It collects basic profile information from respondents and asks them to evaluate the current system in areas like efficiency, accuracy, and report generation. Respondents are also asked to rate common problems of the manual system like time consumption and schedule conflicts. Finally, it asks for recommendations on features of a new computerized system like increased search speeds and security, and suggestions to improve the scheduling and loading process overall.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
The document is a survey questionnaire that is gathering feedback from respondents on the existing manual faculty loading system and ideas for improving a new computerized system. It collects basic profile information from respondents and asks them to evaluate the current system in areas like efficiency, accuracy, and report generation. Respondents are also asked to rate common problems of the manual system like time consumption and schedule conflicts. Finally, it asks for recommendations on features of a new computerized system like increased search speeds and security, and suggestions to improve the scheduling and loading process overall.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as doc, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 3
49
CNSC Computerized Faculty Loading System
Survey Questionnaires
Kindly provide the necessary information on the data needed. Rest assured that the data gathered through this questionnaire will be held with utmost confidence. Your answer and suggestions in this questionnaire will help a lot to ensure the effectiveness of the Computerized Faculty loading System.
Thank you very much for your cooperation.
-The Researchers -
Profile of the Respondent
A. Name of Respondent:___________________________ B. Designation / Position: ___________________________ C. Department: __________________________________ D. Gender: ( ) Male ( ) Female E. Civil Status ( ) Single ( ) Married ( ) Widow ( ) Widower F. Number of years in the service:__________
Part 1: Evaluation of the Existing Manual System
Legend:
VS - Very satisfactory A- Average P- Poor
S- Satisfactory G- Good
VS S A G P
Present status of the existing Faculty Loading System. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Efficiency of the existing manual system when it
comes to the duration of time in faculty loading ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) process
Flow of effectiveness of the faculty loading process. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Generation of reports. ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 50
Part II: Problems Encountered on the Manual Process
Please encircle the number that best corresponds to your choice as to the scale hereunder.
Legend: 1 – Always 3 – Sometimes 5 – Never 2 – Often 4 – Seldom
The following are the perceived problems happened.
1 2 3 4 5
Availability of instructors ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Consume much time and efforts in the process ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Conflicts on schedule ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Limited number of instructor ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Limited number of rooms ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Part III: Recommendation
If we are going to propose Computerized Faculty Loading System, what are the possible suggestions or added features you think will help for the effectiveness of the said system. Please encircle the number that best corresponds to your choice as to the scale hereunder. Legend: 1 – Strongly Agree 3 – Satisfied 5 – Strongly Disagree 2 – Agree 4 – Disagree
1 2 3 4 5
Organize files and records ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Provide security for the protection of files and ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
documents
Increase the speed in searching of files ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
Support rapid, efficiency and effective scheduling and ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
faculty loading process
Can easily generate report ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
51
Part III: Suggestions
Please write below any suggestions that you want to improve with regards to the process of scheduling and faculty loading system used by the College of Engineering and Industrial Technology and the College of Arts and Sciences. ______________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________
