HDM Project FINAL
HDM Project FINAL
HDM Project FINAL
BALOYI. NT 219333998
CONCO. SB 220526869
GUMBI. Z 218331975
MAKAKA. E 220326061
MOSTERT. J 215162595
NELWAMONDO. AA 221002596
NOGWEBELA. B 220145733
Subject: HDM360S
Date: 23 November 2023
I (We) swear that this is the original work of the author(s). All information obtained directly
or indirectly from other sources has been fully acknowledged.
1
Contents
Introduction and Background................................................................................................................4
Estimating water requirements..............................................................................................................5
Piping and irrigation layout Design........................................................................................................5
Pipe selection........................................................................................................................................6
Valve Selection......................................................................................................................................6
Obtaining the manometric head:..........................................................................................................8
Pump selection....................................................................................................................................10
Cavitation of the pump........................................................................................................................12
System costs........................................................................................................................................13
Running costs (yearly).........................................................................................................................13
Maintenance schedule........................................................................................................................14
ANNEXURE...........................................................................................................................................15
References...........................................................................................................................................16
2
Figure 1: Visual representation of r/d ratio..........................................................................................6
Figure 2: Friction Coefficient table for 90` Elbows..............................................................................6
Figure 3: Foot Check Valve..................................................................................................................7
Figure 4: Sectioned Globe Type Check Valve.......................................................................................7
Figure 5: Plug Valve Sectional representation......................................................................................8
Figure 6 System Curve.........................................................................................................................10
Figure 7 System Curve (Final)..............................................................................................................12
3
Introduction and Background
The two sports fields on the north-eastern side (rugby and soccer fields only) of the CPUT
campus need an improved irrigation system. There is a pond in the northern corner (next to
Horticulture) of the campus that could be used as a water source for irrigating the fields. The
objective is to design a piping and pump system to transport the water from the pond to the
fields' area. This report covers various aspects of the project, including estimating water
requirements, designing an irrigation network, selecting appropriate pumps, assessing
cavitation risks, costing the system, determining operating costs, and developing a
maintenance plan.
4
Estimating water requirements
Firstly, the fields irrigation network has been drawn up to determine the water requirements.
To do this, the field area will need to be mapped out and divided into irrigation zones
according to the demands of the turf. The amount of water required will vary depending on
evapotranspiration rates, plant water needs and other environmental factors. We determined
the volume and timing requirements for the irrigation network on a weekly basis through
precise evaluation. It was concluded the total amount of water required for both fields based
on the field sizes is about 250 l/min. However, this will vary depending on different seasons.
Pipe selection
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) has a higher tensile strength than High Density Polythene Pipe
(HDPE) pipe, but stronger does not always mean tougher. While PVC’s tensile strength is
higher than HDPE pipe, it is also a much more brittle product that is susceptible to fatigue
cracking and failures.
HDPE is a more flexible and ductile pipe material. Below is a comparison of the physical
properties of the two types of pipes and their reactions to various conditions.
•Compared to PVC, HDPE is 2,500 times more resistant to damage from water hammer and
fatigue, so the thermoplastic is far less susceptible to cracking and failure over time.
•With a bend radius of 25 times the pipe’s outer diameter, HDPE pipes can form sharper
curves.
5
•HDPE pipes are joined using heat fusion, whereby pipes are thermally fused to form a
seamless, monolithic, leak-free system that can withstand changing water levels, earthquakes,
frost, and other ground movement. Because the fusion joints are self-restrained, they do not
create the same vulnerabilities as bell and spigot joints, which are susceptible to leakage,
over-deflection, over-insertion, and thrust blocking issues.
•Narrow trench widths: Compared to other pipe systems, HDPE pipes allow narrower
trenches, which result in easier and more cost-effective below-ground installation. This is
because the pipes can be joined outside the trench and then lowered into it.
Pipe sizes start larger near the water source and get smaller towards the end of the irrigation
system. Calculating the right pipe size will ensure the application of the right amount of
irrigation water.
Valve Selection
For 90° Pipe Bends That Are Flanged
The resistance coefficient depends not only on the pipe size, but also on the r/d of the bend. It
can also be noted, this is because the length of pipe required to make 90° Elbowsincreases
with higher r/d, which adds more resistance to the flow.
6
Are typically installed in the suction line of a pump to prevent it from losing its prime when
the pump is turned off and the fluid flows back into the supply tank.
K=420 f T
This valve fulfils valve fulfils two functions in a single valve in that it is an isolation valve
and a check valve combined in one valve body.
When fully open, the disc can drop to the closed position automatically in the event of a
reversal flow.
Plug Valves
7
Figure 5: Plug Valve Sectional representation.
Are a quarter turn rotary valve in which the plug rotates 90° from closed to fully open. Plug
valves can be used as on/off isolation valves.
K=18 f T
2
H m =H static +k Q
2 2
K .V fl v
H m =H static + +
2g 2g
l=500 m
d 1= (
√ Qw 4
)( )
v π
d 1= (
√ 0.004166 4
1.3
)( )
π
d 1=0.0639 m=64 mm
d 2=32 mm
Q=v . A
(4 )(0.004166)
v 2=
π (0.032)2
v 2=5.1808 m/s
8
v D1 2
m
R 1= v water=0.000001003( )
v water s
(1.3)(0.064)
=
0.000001003
3
R1=82.951×10
64
f 1= [ Hagen-Poisseulle equation]
R1
f 1=0.000772
v 2 D2
R 2=
v
( 5.1808 ) ( 0.032 )
R 2=
0.000001003
3
R2=165.29 × 10
64
f 2= 3
165.29 × 10
f 2 = 0.000387
Σ f =0.000387
¿ 910 f T
¿(910) ( 0.000387 )
Σ k=0.35217
2
lQ
H m =H static +(Σ k + Σ f ) 2
2g A
2
H m =H static +(0.000387+0.35217)Q ¿ ¿
2
H m= H +614 638.05 Q
static
9
m
3
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
Q( )
h
Hm 2 2.43 3.71 5.84 8.83 12.67 17.37 22.91 29.32 36.57 44.68
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
Flow Rate
Pump selection
The pump that corresponds with the system requirements is a Speroni Centrifugal Pump
CBM 150 230V. (Product catalogue attached to document)
This pump is suitable to pump clean water or non-aggressive liquids with small solid
impurities. The only difference between design requirements and actual pump requirements is
in diameters. The selected pump requires constant inlet and outlet diameters of 50.8mm.
10
d 1=d 2=50.8 mm
Q=vA
(4 )(0.004166)
v=
π ¿¿
v=5.18 m/s
v D1 m
2
R 1= v water=0.000001003( )
v water s
(5.18)(0.0508)
=
0.000001003
3
R1=R 2=262.357 ×10
2× 64
Σf = 3
262.357 × 10
Σ f =0.000489
Σk ¿ 910 f T
¿(910) ( 0.000489 )
Σ k=0.44499
2
lQ
H m =H static +(Σ k + Σ f ) 2
2g A
2
H m =H static +(0.000489+0.44499)Q ¿ ¿
2
H m= H +690 881.61 Q
static
H m=¿ 2+690881.61 Q ¿ 2
11
m
3
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
Q( )
h
Hm 2 2.48 3.92 6.32 9.68 13.99 19.27 25.51 32.71 40.86 49.98
50
40
Head
30
20
10
0
0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30
Flow Rate
NPS H NET =0
Po P v
NPSH NET = −
ρg pg
Pv
@room temp = 25° C ; = 0.33 m
ρg
12
System costs
Material Quantity/size Costs
Sprinklers 5 R1200
Elbows 6 R300
Filters 1 R500
Total R34270
Filter R500
Pipes R1500
labor R3000
13
Maintenance schedule
TASK PURPOSE FREQUENCE TIME OF LEVEL OF
YEAR EXPECTISE
Inspect & Clean Clear of Dust Once a Year Beginning of In- House
Power Contacts and Oxidation Season
Clean Out Prep For Start Once a Year Beginning of In- House
Rodents , Insects Up Season
or Debris
Remove Any Prep For Start Once a Year Beginning of In- House
Winterization Up Season
Covering
14
ANNEXURE
15
References
A Field Perspective on Engineering Commissioning Resources (no date a). Available at:
https://www.av8rdas.com/.
Langston, D. (2023a) “HDPE vs. PVC Pipes,” WL Plastics [Preprint]. Available at:
https://wlplastics.com/hdpe-vs-pvc-pipes/.
Powers, J.P. et al. (2007a) “Appendix A: Friction Losses for Water Flow Through Pipe,” in
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks, pp. 597–602. Available at:
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470168103.app1.
16