CH 11-17
CH 11-17
CH 11-17
Security of Tenure- Er cannot dismiss an Ee without just cause/ authorized cause (Art. 294, LC)
- also works against other personnels which force an Ee to give up his employment without valid
reason.
- protects Ees with regular employment (Art 294, LC)
1) Project, seasonal, fixed term ees -cannot be dismissed without valid cause prior to the
expiration of the term of their employment.
2) Probationary Ees- can be dismissed only for valid causes or failure to qualify for regular
employment
3) Casual employees- who rendered at least one year of service (whether continuous or broken)
cannot be dismissed without valid or authorized cause as long as the activity in which they were
engaged still exists.
1) Dismissal of an Ee who has filed a complaint for violation of the minimum wage law (Art 118,
LC)
2) Dismissal of a female Ee because of marriage (Art 134, LC)
3) Dismissal of female Ees for purpose of preventing her from enjoying any of the benefits
provided under the Labor Code (Art, 135, LC)
4) Dismissal of a female Ee because of pregnancy (Art 135, LC)
5) DIsmissal amounting to unfair labor practice (Art 259, LC)
Illegal dismissal- not a criminal offense; except those provided for in the Labor Code as
unlawful.(Art 303, LC)
1) Dismissal of an Ee who has filed a complaint, testified or is about to testify in a complaint for
recovery of unapid wages
2) Dismissal of a woman-Ee by reason of marriage
3) Dismissal of a woman- Ee because of her pregnancy
4) Dismissal of an Ee who has testified or is about t give testimony in a case pertaining to the
exercise of right to self-organization
Remedy for Illegal Dismissal (p465) - file a complaint before NLRC, not Injunction (not a cuasr of
action. It is merely a provisional remedy)
1) OFW: Reimbursement of his placement fee with 12% inerest per annum and salaries for
unexpired portion of his contract
2) For locally Employed workers: Reinstatement or Backwages or Separation pay
Additional: Moral and exemplary damages and attorneys fees:
Amount of separation pay: Atleast one month salary/One month salary for every year of
service, whichever is higher
GR: Ee dismissed for a just cause is not entitled to separation pay
E: May be awarded as a measure of social justice (i.e ppor performance, financial assistance)
Backwages (p473)
- relief that restores the income that was lost by reason of illegal dismissal
-not cause of action; relief
-computed from the time his compensation was withheld upto the time of his actual
reinstatement (Art 294, LC) - however, this is NOT automatic.
LC, NLRC and courts have discretion to determine how much backwages should be awarded
Arts 118, 135, 259 (f) and 301 of the Labor Code
Can Separation pay and Backwages be awarded simultaneously? YES. The purpose of the
reliefs are different.
*Death
*Physical or Mental Incapacity
*Permanent closure of the establishment
*Temporary closure of estblishment
*Confinement in prison
*Attains retirement age
*Moral Damages= Must be supported by proof that the dismissal was attended by bad faith,
fraud or constituted an act contrary to morals, good customs or public policy and that social
humiliation, wounded feelings, grave anxiety, and similiar injury resulted therefrom
*Exemplary Damages= Ee should prove that his dismissal was done in wanton, oppressive or
malevolent manner.
*Attorney's fees = reasonable compensation paid to a lawyer by his client for legal services
rendered
(Extraordinary concept: It is paid as an item of damages to the client, not lawyer; Art 220, CC)
An EXCEPTION, not a General Rule.
-demands factual and legal justification.
Rule: Claims for damages arising from illegal dismissal should be established along the
principles of the Civil Code
Not enough for Ee to prove that he was dismissed without just cause.
Bad faith- A state of mind dominated by ill will or motive. Does not simply mean negligence or
bad judgement
GN: Corporate officers cannot be personally or solidarily liable wit the corporation for
backwages, damages and other money claims
E: *Corporate officer acted in bad faith
* Corporation is no longer existing and Ee can no longer run after the company
Chapter 12
Managerial prerogatives (p489)
Managerial prerogatives
- inherent rights of all Ers to determine, according to their judgement, all aspects of employment
(hiring, work assignment, working methods, tools to be used, process to be followed,
supervision, transferm lay-off, discipline, dismissal or Ees)
- who can exercise Managerial Prerogatives? Exclusively to Er.
GN: Ers cannot place a job advertisement which suggests age preference, declining an
applicant for employment because of age
E: Can validly set age limitations when age is bona fide occupational qualification
Bona fide occupational qualification= standards which Ers are allowed to consider in making
decisions about hiring or retention of Ees
Prerogatives:
1)Promotion of Ees to supervisory/ managerial position as such are offices that can only be
held by persons who have trust of the Er
Ee who refused to accept promotion cannot be subjected to disciplinary action.
2) Transfering Ees (p491) - right of tenure not an issue as he cannot deprive company of its
prerogative to change assignment where he can be msot useful
Refusal to transfer- can be validly dismissed
3) Change work schedule- must be exercised in good faith for interest of the company and
NOT for the purpose of defeating or circumventing rights of Ee
4) To reorganize and abolish positions (p494) - right of an Er to conduct its own business
affairs
Abolishing a department/section cannot be questioned.
6) Transfer of business ownership- buyer/ transferee is not legally obliged to absorb Ees of
the seller/transferror
Sucessor-Er Doctrine (p496)- Transfer og ownershup was done in bad faith, succesor-Er will be
deemed to have absorbed the Ees
9) Promulgate company policies, rules and regulations- Until and unless the rules and
policies are declared to be illegal, the Ee must follow them
No Spouse employment policy- prohibition of Ees from marrying Ees of a competitor company is
valid.
- sought to be avoided: Conflict of Interest
Anti- Nepotism Employment Policy/ Reasonable Business Necessity rule (p498)- validity of an
employment policy that prohibits spouses from working for he same company should be tested
and proven that policy is founded on business necessity and not just on a general perception
that spouses in the same workplace might affect the business.
Non-compete Employment Policy (p499)- contract which prohibits an employee from engaging in
a business/ employment competitive with that of his employer after the term of his employment
(for a given period)
It will not be considered restraint of trade if:
1) Restraint imposed is not greater than what is necessary to afford reasonable protection to the
Er
2) Contract provides for a limitation upon either time or place.
*Non-compete agreement is reasonable and necessary if imposed against Ees who have
insight into the general scope and details of Er's business
*Limitation: Prohibition is limited to similiar or competitive business or employment for a
limited period.
*- even of the Ee admits to having breached the Non- Compete agreement, the Er must still
prove that it suffered damages and amount of damages that he incurred.
10) To promulgate Discipline -in the form of a warning, reprimand, suspension, demotion or
dismissal from service
Effect of acquital or conviction (p507)- not dependent upon a verdict of guilt or innocence in a
criminal case
Evidence required by law in Labor cases- substantial evidence
However, the subsequent convition of an Ee in a criminal cae will nullify the final judgement
declaring the dismissal illegal.
The conviction of the Ee in the criminal case affirms the existence of a valid ground for his
dismissal.
The right of Ees to participate in policy and decision-making is confined only to processes that
directly affect their rights, benefits and welfare.
Chapter 13
Just causes for dismissal (p511)
Art 29 of the LC provides for the termination of employment of any of the ff causes-
1) Serious and
2) Work-connected
Disobedience to Er's orders (p518) will constitute a valid cause for dismissal when:
1) It is willful
2) Order is reasonable, lawful (It order is unlawful, it will not consitute willful disobedience)
3) Order must be work-connected
1) Gross
2) Habitual
Eg.. Habitual tardiness, absentism (Deduction from wages does not bar Er from penalizing Ee
for his tardiness)
Neglect Negligence
Person has not done what he has to do Indicates a particular reason why man has
(objective) failed to do his duty (subjective)
Fraud (p526)
1) Work-connected
2) Committed against Er (Fraud committed against third persons may still be a valid cause if it
puts the Er under risk of a lawsuit)
1) Willful
2) Work-related
3) Committed by an Ee who holds a position of trust
Position of Trust: Alternative answer: All have right of security of tenure
Managerial and regularly handle money
*Conflict of Interest and misappropriation of company funds may also result in breach of trust
(p531)
Loss of confidence should have basis
Comission of a crime (p534)
1) Er
2) Authorized representative
3) Immediate memebr of the Er's family
-offense must have an element similar to the specific grounds enumerated udner Art 287 of the
LC
e.g attitude problem, unreasonable behavior, theft committed against another Ee, obesity
*Immorality should be treated and viewwed in a public and secular standpoint, not religious.
*Staging an illegal strike.
*Defiance of a return-to-work order.
*Breach of Union Security Agreement.
*Drug Abuse
*Failure to comply with a government regulation
*Violation of ompany rules and regulation
* Sexual harassment - act of demanding or requesting sexual favor, by a person having
authority or moral ascendancy over another
atleast 1/2 of the members should be women. It must also be headed by a woman
Procedural Due process (p548) (Art 292, LC)
1) Serve a written notice to explain (atleast 5 days is sufficient to constitute ‘reasonable time to
explain’)
2) Conduct a hearing
3) Serve a written notice of decision to the EE (Twin Notice rule)
'Opportunity to be heard' is satisfied when Ee was first required to explain ebfore imposing a
disciplinary action
Administrative hearing
-summary in nature
-not a matter of right (Ee shoudl ask for it)
- Confrontation of witness, not essential
- no right to counsel
-evidence: Substantial evidence
-If dismissal is adjudged to be valid, lack of due process does not nullify the dismissal.
- Er is only liable for nominal damages (amount is decided by court)
Remedy (p553)
1)Installation of labor-saving devices- Er has the right to mechanize/ modernize its business
even though it means dismissal of the employees (Soriano vs NLRC, Phil Sheet Metal Workers
vs CIR)
2) Redundancy -mode of reducing personnel when the required services are more than what is
demanded by the actual requirements of the enterprise.
-Er cannot be denied the right to reorganize to protect his Ees
- "Last in, First out" is not applicable in redundancy as what is looked into is the position itself,
the nature of services performed and necessity.
- can still be exercised even if not suffering losses. (financial condition not a factor)
Requisites: (p555)
3)Retrenchment (p559)
Requisites:
1) Must be done to prevent losses (actual or unexpected losses) (Actual losses must be
substantial; not de minimis)
2) Fair and reasonable criteria must be used in determining who would be dismissed.
"Last-in-First-Out" can be applied
3) Retrenchment must be last resort
*Less drastic measures: Reduced time, rotation of workers, trimming costs, etc
*Expected/ Actual losses may be proven by income statement
Redundancy Retrenchment
Separation pay 1 month pay/ 1 month for 1 month pay or at least 1/2
every year of service month pay for every year of
(whichever is higher) service (whichever is higher)
4)Prevent losses
-Er may not require Ees not to report for work anymore
-to "stay at home and tend the garden"
-contemplates contagious and non-communicable diseases (stroke, heart attack, mental illness)
-diseases does not ipso facto make a valid dismissal
-due to: installation of labor-saving device, redundancy, retenchment to prevent losses, closure,
diseases = entitled to separation pay
1) Atleast one month pay or 1 month pay for every year of service (whichever is higher) for:
2) At least one month pay or one-half (1/2) month pay for every year of service (whichever
is higher) for:
*Retenchment
*Closure of establishment (not due to business losses)
*Disease
3) Commission basis= based on avergae commissions earned during the past year of
employment
4) Seasonal Ees= 1/2 if their respectie average monthly pay during the last season x # of years
they rendered service (must work for atleast 6 months)
1) NO if:
2) YES if:
Ees who are terminated for any of the authorized causes may be entitled to both separation pay
and retirement pay
GR: No retirement benefits are payable in the instance of resignations or terminations for cause
E: One who oresigns after being qualified for optional early retirement
Lay-off (p574)
-bona fide suspension of the operation of a business or understaking for a period not exceeding
6 months or fulfillment by the Ee of a military/civic duty shall not terminate emloyment (Art 301,
LC)
-Er shall reinstate the Ee to his former position if he indicates his desire to resume his work not
later than one month from resumption of operations of his Er from his relief from military or civic
duty
- temporary closure due to lack of orders, work, reduction in volume of businesses, lack of
materials, losses in business operations, business recission, industrial depression, floating
status
1) Closure done in good faith: Ees will be entitled to separation pay of atleast 1 month pay or
1/2 month pay for every year of service (whichever is higher)
Except: Closure was due to serious business losses
YES.
Resignation (p578)
-Ee gives up his employment because Er does things that are intended to force Ee to quit
Test of constructive dismissal: Whether a reasonable person in the Ee's position would have felt
the need to give up his position because the Er or his representative subjected the Ee to serious
insult or inhuman and unbearable treatment, committed a crime against the Ee or his immediate
family members
-ee who decided to quit his job due to unbearability is not required to give one-month adavcne
notice (p582)
-Reinstatement not proper for constructively dismissed Ees
-Relief: Separation pay and backwages
-Ee constructively dismissed= Probationary Ee
Requisites:
Requisites:
Confirmation of intent to abandon: Notice to report for work should be sent to last known
address of the Ee
Chapter 17-
Retirement (p594)
Retirement-
1) Ees who have not rendered service for atleast 5 years (Art 302, LC)
2) Ees of retail, service or agricultural establishemnts
1) When there is retirement plan, CBA or Employment contract- upon reaching retirement age
(Art 302, LC)
2) No retirement plan, CBA or employment contract- reaching the retirement age prescribed by
the Labor Code
-whether retirement was optional or compulsory, Ee is entitled to 1/2 month salary for every
years of service, 1/2 being computed at 22.5 days Santo vs Univ of Cebu
Computation of 1/2 month salary of Ees who do not have fixed wages (p602)
1) Commission based: Average commissioned earned during teh past year of employment
2) Paid by results: Average daily salary for the last 12 months
3) Seasonal Ees: average monthly pay during last season multiplied by the number of actual
years of service
Re-hire retirement issues: Re-hiring not computed for the sake of retirement benefits