AVL GlobalVehicleBM - JSAE2019

AVL List GmbH (Headquarters)
Global Vehicle Benchmarking

グローバル車両ベンチマーク
Objective vehicle testing, analysis and comparison to competitors
定量的な車両評価、解析、及び競合車との比較
Global AVL Network for Vehicle Benchmarking
車両ベンチマークにおけるAVLの国際ネットワーク
> 100 PEFORMANCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION
new vehicles per year cost efficient

DRIVEABILITY REAL WORLD DRIVING
> 500 customer

HANDLING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
vehicles in database individual RIDE COMFORT DRIVING RESISTANCE
SOUND/NVH CHARGING EXPERIENCE

> 60 independent
vehicle ADAS QUALITY
benchmarking staff
comparison
11 11 functional driving attributes

target setting >1000 single criteria
global affiliates
Public Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 2
Fun-to-Drive – Efficiency Balance
運転する楽しさと高効率のバランス
FUN-TO-DRIVE EFFICIENCY
PEFORMANCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

AVL-DRIVE™
DRIVEABILITY REAL WORLD DRIVING
HANDLING ENERGY EFFICIENCY
RIDE COMFORT DRIVING RESISTANCE
making driving SOUND/NVH CHARGING EXPERIENCE

experiences
measureable and
assessable ADAS QUALITY
Objective KPIs for all driving attributes

運転に関する指標全てについて定量的評価指標(KPI)を設定
Global Vehicle Benchmarking 国際車両ベンチマーク
Key aspects and process 鍵となる着眼点と業務プロセス
Why does it necessary to benchmark competitor vehicle? なぜ競合車両をベンチマークする必要がある？
Comparison to Characterization and Defining potential for

Scouting technologies
competition Branding optimization
How does AVL do it? AVLはどうやってベンチマークを実施している？
Automatic
Operation Mode
Detection
Online
Parameter Automatic
Calculation Report
Generation
Instant
Attributes
Assessment
Vehicle Instrumentation Vehicle Testing Report – Highlights and Vehicle Target Setting
(test tracks and dynos) improvement potential
How long does it take? 時間はどれぐらい掛かる？
1. Instrumentation, data acquisition/testing and assessment: ~ 3-5 weeks 計測準備・テスト・解析で3～5週間

2. Customer report generation: ~ 3 weeks 顧客レポート作成で～3週間
What’s new in AVL’s data base?
AVLのデータベース品揃えの最新ラインナップ(予定)？
*SO: system output
~30 electric/fuel cell 2019 Nissan Leaf e+ 2019 Hyundai Nexo 2019 Audi Q6 etron
(BEV, 62kWh) (BEV, 95kWh)
electric vehicles
(FCEV, 1.65kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019
Existing vehicle database
already including
2018 NIO ES8 2019 Mercedes EQC 2019 Roewe Marvel X

(BEV, 70kWh) (BEV, 80kWh) (BEV, 52,5kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q3/2019
~50 gasoline
PHEV/HEV vehicles
2019 BMW 330i 2019 Infinty QX50 2019 VW Golf GTI TCR
(AT8, 190kW) (CVT, 200kW) (DCT7, 213kW)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019
~200 gasoline vehicles 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid 2019 Honda Accord 2019 Honda CR-V Hybrid
(HEV, SO:163kW, Hybrid (HEV, SO:135kW,
4.6l/100km) (HEV, SO:156kW, 5.5l/100km)
Planning in progress 5l/100km) Planning in progress
Planning in progress
Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

Manfred Kogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 5
Example case of vehicle benchmarking
車両ベンチマークの実事例
16
9.6 9.6
2.6
14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12
8.1
Attribute Rating
10 7.7 7.8
16.6
8 7.5 7.1
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7 VW eGolf
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0
5.7
2
5.5
DR … AVL-DRIVE Rating
0
Efficiency Electric range 0-100 80-120 Agility Body motion Max. lateral Powerfulness Pedal to Transient Speed Assist Lane Assist
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR] Chevrolet Bolt
[kWh/100km] [km] [m/s²] [DR] [DR] [DR]
ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS
(in total more than 800 single criteria for driving attributes)
Class leading scores for
16 handling, but big potentials for
State of the art electric range 9.6
longitudinal handling 9.6
2.6
also due to high recuperation
14 11.7
rates
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12
8.1 Potential for improvements for

Leading in longitudinal
ADAS quality, esp. due to TOF
Attribute Rating
7.7 7.8
Overall acceptable efficiency performance
10
switch cut-out
level 16.6
(high vehicle mass and
7.1
8
mid aerodynamics) 7.5
7.0
Good acceleration feel and
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
dynamic character in full load
6.7 and part load condition & quick VW eGolf
6.6
160
6.2
transient response
4
6.0
5.7
2
5.5
0
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR] Chevrolet Bolt
16
9.6 9.6
2.6
14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12
What is Tesla’s operation

8.1 strategy
to reach high driving range?
Attribute Rating
10 7.7 7.8
8
16.6
Let’s have a deeper7.5look 7.1
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0
5.7
2
5.5
0
(WLTC) (WLTC) [s] [s] [DR] [DR] acceleration at full load torque response [DR] [DR]
Inside into Energy Management & Efficiency
エネルギーマネジメントと高効率の内訳
HV E-MOTOR
75 kWh
REAR AXLE
192 367
kW Nm ENERGY LOSS
18.0 17.8 15.0

3.8 3.9 4.0
Recuperated Energy 9.6

Consumed Energy HV System
AUX. LOAD
Units in kWh/100km
1.6
Recuperated energy:3.8kWh/100km Full utilization of system

Peak recuperation power in WLTC: 55kW capabilities for
System potential for recuperation: 56kW increased driving range
16
9.6 9.6
2.6
14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12
What is Tesla’s performance feel
8.1
and how is the consistency 7.8
over
Attribute Rating
10 7.7
battery SOC?
16.6
8
Let’s have
7.5 a deeper look 7.1
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0
5.7
2
5.5
0
Performance – 0-100kph 0-100km/h加速性能
Competitive landscape 市場競争力の見通し
• The Model 3 shows excellent 0-

100 kph acceleration considering
the weight to power ratio
• It keeps up with models that have
about a 20% better weight to
power ratio and reaches the same
acceleration time
2018 Tesla Model 3
Performance from standstill
静止状態からの車両性能(パフォーマンス)
Full load acceleration from Standstill
Tesla Model 3 Tesla Model 3

Weight: 1870 kg OEM data
High SOC Low SOC
0 to 40 kph 2.0 s 2.1 s
Track: dry, 10 deg C 0 to 80 kph 4.1 s 4.3 s
0 to 100 kph 5.5 s 6.1 s 5.3 s

Mode:
Default (only one is 0 to 140 kph 9.9 s 11.9 s
available)
0 to 180 kph 17.5 s 22.6 s • Tesla Model 3 misses the OEM data by
0 to 200 kph 23.4 s 32.0 s
0.2 seconds. With low SOC the car
performs significantly worse than with
0 to 220 kph 32.2 s 48.9 s high SOC especially at speeds above
100 kph.
Initial acceleration 5.4 m/s²
[m/s²]
Standing quarter
miles/ 14.0 @ 163 kph
400 m time
Performance Acceleration from standstill
Dependency on SOC SOC依存の加速性能
Accelerator pedal [%]
0-200 kph times

Each dot describes the
Result of one single
maneuver
Acceleration Chassis [m/s2]
0-100 kph times Battery SOC [%]
Vehicle Speed [kph]
• The acceleration times to 100 kph stay consistent over the SOC range.
• Over 100 kph the difference between the SOC levels result in much different acceleration times.
• The lower the SOC the longer the 0-200 kph time. The car looses approximately 8 seconds between the fastest (Full SOC) and
slowest times (20% SOC)
16
9.6 9.6
2.6
14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12
8.1 What is Tesla’s character for lateral

dynamics?
Attribute Rating
10 7.7 7.8
8
16.6 Let’s have a deeper
7.1
look
7.5
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0
5.7
2
5.5
0
HANDLING EVALUATION ハンドリング評価
Body motion 車体の動きに関する評価
The main operation mode Body Motion

rates the body motion of the vehicle in
terms of pitch and roll.
This occurs due to lateral and
longitudinal acceleration forces
generated by accelerating, braking, or
cornering.
HANDLING EVALUATION ハンドリング評価
Body motion – Cornering 車体の動きー特にコーナリングに関して
Roll Angle and Roll Characteristic in

cornering situations
The 3D plot shows the relation between
roll angle and lateral acceleration.
Roll angle gradient ~3.1°/g This relation is normally linear, which

enables the calculation of a gradient.
Roll angle gradient: ~3.1°/g
16
9.6 9.6
2.6
14 11.7
5.4 Tesla Model 3
8.9
512 Long Range
12
8.1 Why is the Model 3 better rated for

driveability than the competitor?
Attribute Rating
10 7.7 7.8
8
16.6
7.5 7.1 Let’s have a deeper look
7.0
11.5 7.0
6 13.3
6.7
6.6
160
4 6.2
6.0
5.7
2
5.5
0
Linking drivers perception to physical data
運転者の認知と、物理的データの相関
Deep understanding of “Why”,
Leading position for dynamic feel
based on measurement data
describing driving characteristics
Dynamic acceleration feel

Acceptable controllability
Good level comfort
Objective assessment of “How” Tesla Model 3
Linear pedal map

Good controllability
Class leading comfort
Chevrolet Bolt
Target setting and Requirement engineering
目標設定と要求工学
Customer Market Profile and Target List
顧客の市場プロファイルと目標(値)一覧
Performance
High Moderate
Driveability
Engaging Relaxed
Objective targets Energy
COMFORT Efficiency
Objective targets High Low
SPORTY
Handling
Dynamic Relaxed
Ride Comfort
Controlled Comfortable
Sound /
NVH
Powerful Luxury
Brake & ESC
Aggressive Stable
Further
attributes
Public HighKogler, Daisuke Tamaru | AVL Japan K.K. / AVL List GmbH | 22-24 May 2019 | 21 Low
Manfred
Driveability - Drive away 全開加速時のドライバビリティ
Detailed assessment criteria for „Drive away - Standing start“
Overall competitor character

Target
• best in class ratings for response
delay
• excellent ratings for jerks for all
events
• lowest rating for bump at
Overall
rating standing start (7.3) indicates a
(weighted more dynamic oriented vehicle
average of a Ratings (weighted
high number average) for detailed
calibration
of single criteria characterizing the
maneuvers) maneuver “Drive away” Target
high demand for driving comfort
→ Still good response rating, but
high scores for comfort relevant
criteria, esp. “Bump” (max.
gradient of longitudinal accel-
eration)
Competitor A
Drive away 全開加速
Target setting and requirement engineering 目標設定と要求工学
From vehicle targets to system requirements

Component specification and selection according to
• Transient response characteristic
• Max torque build-up gradient
• Max torque level
Competitor A
Competitor A Competitor A Competitor A
Target
Target
Each dot
describes the
rating of one
single maneuver
Charging experience 充電性能
An additional aspect in vehicle benchmarking of electrified vehicles
電気自動車(Battery EV)に関する車両ベンチマークの新しい指標
Charging experience Benchmarking
充電性能ベンチマーク
Project with fast Influence of battery Charging performance

charging and Chassis temperature to charging and efficiency in
Dyno Tests performance different power classes
Comparison of ELECTRIC VEHICLES with focus on customer usability

Charging efficiency 充電効率
100
Recharge efficiency [%]
95
90 Models have different charging concepts
85
40kW (DC) Charging efficiency is almost
independent from battery temp
80
22kW
75 BMW i3 A
Vehicle Charging efficiency strongly depends on
11kW charging power
Chevrolet
Vehicle BBolt
70 C-segment
7kW BEVs Hyundai
VehicleIoniq
C
Charging power is heavily impacting
65 Renault
VehicleZoe
D charging duration
2kW VW eGolf E
Vehicle
60
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Average charge power [kW]
*SO: system output
~30 electric/fuel cell 2019 Nissan Leaf e+ 2019 Hyundai Nexo 2019 Audi Q6 etron
(BEV, 62kWh) (BEV, 95kWh)
electric vehicles
(FCEV, 1.65kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019
already including
2018 NIO ES8 2019 Mercedes EQC 2019 Roewe Marvel X

(BEV, 70kWh) (BEV, 80kWh) (BEV, 52,5kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q3/2019
~50 gasoline
PHEV/HEV vehicles
(AT8, 190kW) (CVT, 200kW) (DCT7, 213kW)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q2/2019
~200 gasoline vehicles 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid 2019 Honda Accord 2019 Honda CR-V Hybrid
(HEV, SO:163kW, Hybrid (HEV, SO:135kW,
4.6l/100km) (HEV, SO:156kW, 5.5l/100km)

*SO: system output
~30 electric/fuel cell

弊社AVLのベンチマークプログラムにご興味があるお客様は是非、 2019 Nissan Leaf e+
(BEV, 62kWh)
2019 Hyundai Nexo 2019 Audi Q6 etron
(BEV, 95kWh)
electric vehicles
(FCEV, 1.65kWh)
Q2/2019 Q2/2019
弊社営業担当にお問い合わせください
Q3/2019
already including
• どんな車両がAVLデータベースにラインナップされている (今後の予定)？ 2018 NIO ES8

(BEV, 70kWh)
2019 Mercedes EQC
(BEV, 80kWh)
2019 Roewe Marvel X
(BEV, 52,5kWh)
Q2/2019 Q3/2019 Q3/2019
• 〇〇という着眼点のデータのみ(一部切り分け)が欲しいが、可能か？
~50 gasoline
PHEV/HEV vehicles
• 予算管理の関係上すぐに成果が欲しい・・・可能か？ (AT8, 190kW)

Q2/2019
(CVT, 200kW)
Q3/2019
(DCT7, 213kW)
Q2/2019
• 新しい車両を企画している、ベンチマークをどう生かすべきか？
→別資料
~200 Vehicle
gasoline Concept Engineering も是非ご覧ください
vehicles 2019 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid
(HEV, SO:163kW,
2019 Honda Accord
Hybrid
2019 Honda CR-V Hybrid
(HEV, SO:135kW,
4.6l/100km) (HEV, SO:156kW, 5.5l/100km)

Thank You
www.avl.com

AVL GlobalVehicleBM - JSAE2019

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AVL GlobalVehicleBM - JSAE2019

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

AVL GlobalVehicleBM - JSAE2019

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

AVL List GmbH (Headquarters)

Global Vehicle Benchmarking

> 100 PEFORMANCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

new vehicles per year cost efficient

> 500 customer

vehicles in database individual RIDE COMFORT DRIVING RESISTANCE

SOUND/NVH CHARGING EXPERIENCE

11 11 functional driving attributes

PEFORMANCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION

HANDLING ENERGY EFFICIENCY

RIDE COMFORT DRIVING RESISTANCE

making driving SOUND/NVH CHARGING EXPERIENCE

Objective KPIs for all driving attributes

Comparison to Characterization and Defining potential for

How does AVL do it? AVLはどうやってベンチマークを実施している？

How long does it take? 時間はどれぐらい掛かる？

1. Instrumentation, data acquisition/testing and assessment: ~ 3-5 weeks 計測準備・テスト・解析で3～5週間

2018 NIO ES8 2019 Mercedes EQC 2019 Roewe Marvel X

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～ がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

8.1 Potential for improvements for

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

What is Tesla’s operation

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

18.0 17.8 15.0

Recuperated Energy 9.6

Recuperated energy:3.8kWh/100km Full utilization of system

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

• The Model 3 shows excellent 0-

2018 Tesla Model 3

Tesla Model 3 Tesla Model 3

0 to 100 kph 5.5 s 6.1 s 5.3 s

Accelerator pedal [%]

0-200 kph times

0-100 kph times Battery SOC [%]

Vehicle Speed [kph]

8.1 What is Tesla’s character for lateral

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

The main operation mode Body Motion

Roll Angle and Roll Characteristic in

Roll angle gradient ~3.1°/g This relation is normally linear, which

Roll angle gradient: ~3.1°/g

8.1 Why is the Model 3 better rated for

ECONOMY PERFORMANCE HANDLING DRIVEABILITY ADAS

Dynamic acceleration feel

Objective assessment of “How” Tesla Model 3

Linear pedal map

Brake & ESC

Overall competitor character

From vehicle targets to system requirements

Competitor A Competitor A Competitor A

Project with fast Influence of battery Charging performance

Comparison of ELECTRIC VEHICLES with focus on customer usability

90 Models have different charging concepts

2018 NIO ES8 2019 Mercedes EQC 2019 Roewe Marvel X

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～ がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

~30 electric/fuel cell

• どんな車両がAVLデータベースにラインナップされている (今後の予定)？ 2018 NIO ES8

• 予算管理の関係上 すぐに成果が欲しい・・・可能か？ (AT8, 190kW)

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される

• 予算管理の関係上すぐに成果が欲しい・・・可能か？ (AT8, 190kW)

Public 顧客要望の高い車両を中心に、毎年10台～がAVLベンチマーク対象車として選定される