USAID Engaging Men in Gender Equality July 2023
USAID Engaging Men in Gender Equality July 2023
USAID Engaging Men in Gender Equality July 2023
JULY 2023
This training manual is made possible with the generous support of the American people through
the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), contract number AID-OAA-I-14-00059.
It was prepared by Tetra Tech in partnership with Equimundo.
The contents of the training manual are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect
the views of USAID or the United States Government.
Recommended citation: USAID’s Engendering Industries. 2023. Engaging Men for Gender Equality.
Acknowledgments:
Tetra Tech and Equimundo are grateful to all those who contributed their valuable time, expertise, and support to the
development of this training manual. We especially thank staff at:
• USAID’s Engendering Industries program: Adrienne Raphael, Bridget Bradley, Elicia Blumberg, Emma Edwards, Jamila
Durdygulyyeva, Jasmine Boehm, Jessica Menon, Khumo Mokhethi, Morgan Hillenbrand, and Victoria Rames
• Equimundo: Cody Ragonese, Giovanna Lauro, Joseph Vess (lead author), Patrick Welsh (lead author), Rachel Katz,
and Equimundo consultants Anita Vasudeva (India), Augustin Kimonyo (Rwanda); and Douglas Mendoza (Nicaragua),
and
− Ibadan Electricity Distribution Company (IBEDC), Nigeria: Ademola Adewumi, Angela Olanrewaju, Daniel Iyoha-
Ojie, Jude Eguabor, and Olanrewaju Oseni
− Empresa Distribuidora de Electricidad del Sur (EDESur), Dominican Republic: Jenny Gonzalez, Miguel Jose
Santana Rojas, Yanela Zapata Garcia and Yndhira Mendez Polanco
− BSES Rajdhani Power Limited (BRPL), India: Padma Singh, Pramod Kumar Mishra, Puneet Jain, and Shivani Kumar
Table of Contents
Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Glossary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Background Information on USAIDs Engendering Industries Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Men’s Engagement for Gender Equality within Male-Dominated Industries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
The Goal of this Training Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2. GENERAL GUIDELINES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Training Manual Organization and Content . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Thematic Units . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Checking in and Out . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Sequencing of Thematic Units in this Training Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Designing Customized Trainings Using this Training Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Sample Agendas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Half-Day Workshop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Two-Day Workshop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Four-Day Workshop . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Twelve Weekly 90-Minute Sessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
Six Weekly (or Every Two Weeks) 60-Minute Sessions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Implementing the Training Manual . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Choosing the Venue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Mixed-Gender and Single-Gender Spaces . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
Recruiting Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Fostering Continued Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
UNIT 5: Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92
Activity 5.1 Exploring the Meaning of Power . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93
Activity 5.2 Power Walk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
Activity 5.3 Who is More Powerful? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 101
Activity 5.4 The Circle of Discrimination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105
Activity 5.5 Power Flower . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109
Activity 5.6 The Power Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
5. ANNEXES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
Annex A: Icebreakers and Energizers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204
Annex B Planning, Monitoring, and Evaluation Tools . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
Annex B.1 Sample Action Plan Template . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205
Annex B.2 Tool For Monitoring Facilitators’ Performance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 207
Annex B.3 Pre-/Post-Assessment Tool to Measure Increases in Participants’ Knowledge, Skills and Abilities . . . . . . 208
Annex B.4 Pre-/Post-Assessment Tool to Measure Shifts in Attitudes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 213
Annex B.5 Tool for Participants’ Appraisal of Training Content Delivery and Facilitation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 215
Annex B.6 Tool for Participants’ Evaluation of Trainings Received . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 217
Glossary
ALLY: Any person who actively promotes and aspires CAREGIVER: A key figure, such as a significant other or
to advance the culture of inclusion through intentional, other family member, who provides unpaid assistance in
positive, and conscious efforts that benefit people as caring for an individual, whether that individual is a young
a whole. A male ally is any person identifying as a man child, family member with disabilities, or elderly parent.
who advocates for and speaks up in support of gender (Source: MenCare-50-50-South-Africa-Manual)
equality and against other forms of discrimination and
bias. (Source: Atcheson, 2018; Engendering Industries CISGENDER: People who identify with the gender that
Delivering Gender Equality: A Best Practices Framework is typically associated with the sex they were assigned at
for Male-Dominated Industries) birth. For example, a person who was assigned “female”
Sociocultural norms, education and training gaps, and women’s inability to balance work and caregiver
responsibilities are some of the limiting factors that negatively impact women’s workforce participation.
Through its Intensive Program and Accelerated Program, Engendering Industries partners with 67 organizations
across 38 countries, delivering a unique approach to increase gender equality in male-dominated industries.
Through customized best practices, demand-driven coaching, and training programs, Engendering Industries
builds the capacity of leaders to implement gender equality interventions in their organizations.
Engendering Industries is advancing men’s engagement by involving men as agents of change in actively
promoting gender equality, women’s empowerment, and the transformation of inequitable masculinities. This
training manual is the result of an adaptive learning process, created out of a yearlong series of pilot trainings
that Equimundo and Engendering Industries led for men’s engagement allies at several male-dominated industry
partners participating in the program.
The findings reveal inequalities in employer practices and outcomes as well as disparities in the way organizations
run their businesses, both of which ultimately impact the ability of women and men to participate fully in the
energy sector.
The study also discusses how men at partner utilities can show leadership on and benefit from certain gender
equality interventions. For example, at several companies, men have mentioned that they would like paternity leave
to be offered as a benefit. Furthermore, the study notes that men are encouraged and reassured when they see
other men supporting gender equity initiatives and recommends that both men and women champion change for
gender equality within partner organizations.
In January 2021, Engendering Industries identified the importance of supporting men’s engagement “through
identification of male change agents and motivating them to act as promoters and ambassadors for gender equality.”2
• Recognize male employees as critical stakeholders in achieving gender equality in the workplace.
• Raise awareness among male employees about gender equality issues, toxic masculinity, and how gender equality
benefits both women and men as well as the organization.
• Encourage male employees to become mentors, allies, change agents, ambassadors, and sponsors, with active
roles and responsibilities identified in job descriptions and/or change management plans.
• Encourage male employees to actively participate and become vocal supporters in awareness-raising campaigns
such as the #HeForShe campaign, which asks men to speak out against violence and discrimination against
women and girls around the world.
• Coordinate company and division dialogues in which men and women hold small group discussions and
interactive trainings, sharing their corporate culture change goals and how to achieve them.
• Support male leaders to amplify and model what male allyship looks like and encourage other male employees
to participate in achieving culture change and gender equality goals.
• Create a safe space for men to talk about the impacts they experience as a result of gender imbalance
and gender inequality and provide opportunities or even encourage them to step out of traditional roles
and patterns.
GENDER INCLUSIVITY
Throughout the training manual, “men” and “women” refer to all people who self-identify as such, including both
cisgender and transgender men and women. Although the activities can be relevant for persons of all gender
identities, they were intentionally designed to expose and interrogate the inequities within the gender binary
and, therefore, generally work within these structures.
As such, this training manual addresses the gendered experiences of men and women and the transformation of
harmful gender stereotypes and norms. It acknowledges the limitations of the gender binary and the marginalization
that nonbinary, gender-nonconforming, and queer people experience. Users of the manual are encouraged,
therefore, to be inclusive of all gender identities of training participants and sensitive to the intersectionality of
participants’ gender identities (cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary) with other aspects of their identities, such
as sexual orientation, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and religious affiliation.
The manual seeks to engage men through reflection and dialogue that promote healthy masculinity and attitudes and
practices that reflect the values of equality, respect, collaboration, and allyship with women.
THEMATIC UNITS
The training manual is organized into ten thematic units, each of which contains training activities relevant to the
thematic content of the unit.
• Unit 1: Introductions
• Unit 5: Power
Each unit begins with a brief explanation of its overall learning objectives and the thematic content covered.
ACTIVITIES
Each thematic unit contains a series of activities that have been sourced from training manuals from Africa, Latin
America, and Asia; revised for a workplace context; and adapted where necessary. The level of complexity and
time needed for each activity varies, so the training manual can be adapted to diverse settings and stakeholders.
Although there are topics that transcend workplace cultures, the authors have focused the content to be
relevant to a corporate setting.
Engendering Industries has prioritized activities from manuals used in training processes that have been rigorously
evaluated and that, according to What Works to Prevent Violence3 and USAID’s Collective Action to Reduce
Gender-Based Violence,4 have been effective in reducing violence against women and girls5 and changing
inequitable attitudes and practices. Additional activities from other relevant resources have also been included.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: Each activity indicates which groups of participants it can be used with (mixed-
gender, men only, or women only).
TITLE AND LENGTH: You may choose to share the title with the group. The activity’s recommended
length is also indicated but varies depending upon the number of participants and any adaptations you make
to accommodate participant characteristics and the time available.
OBJECTIVES: By the end of the activity, participants will be able to state their expectations for the training.
KEY MESSAGE(S): Expectations can be varied and related to the thematic content, methodology, relations,
outcomes, and process.
MATERIALS: The materials required to facilitate the activity are listed. Materials are optional for some activities.
PREPARATION: These are the steps that you should take in advance to prepare for the activity. They should be
completed prior to each session to save time and to help the activity flow smoothly.
PROCEDURE: These are the steps to carry out the activity; they may need to be adapted to different contexts.
Be attentive to whether the steps are appropriate for the participants they are working with.
Most of the activities include group discussion questions to help guide the discussion on the activity topic. These
questions serve as guidance; it is not necessary to discuss all questions or to ask them in the order in which they
are listed.
CLOSING STATEMENT(S): Final statement(s) are provided for you to give to the group at the end of each
activity. The closing statement(s) emphasize the activity’s key message(s).
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: These tips address specific aspects of the methodology and/or thematic
content of the activity that may require particular attention.
• Whether something new has happened for them since the previous session.
• Whether they have taken any action since the previous session.
Checking out is when participants make concrete commitments to actions they will take before the next session.
Checking out–type exercises are already included in many activities, but it is always useful to end a session with
participants making a commitment to do something practical before the next session.
6 Adapted from Equimundo, Manhood 2.0.
As such, the selection and order of activities should endeavor to reflect the sequencing of the thematic units, which
are organized in the following thematic blocks:
UNIT Unit 1 contains introductory activities that cover the purpose and focus of USAID’s Engendering
1 Industries program, expectations, and objectives and create an atmosphere of mutual trust.
Unit 2-4 focus on ensuring that participants have a solid understanding of the sociocultural character
UNITS
of gender identities, roles, norms, stereotypes, and relations and how gendered socialization lead
2-4 directly to gender inequalities in opportunities, rights, and access to resources. How much activities
from these units will be used depends on participants’ previous exposure to gender topics, their level
of knowledge, and the degree to which their attitudes and behavior are gender-equitable.
Unit 5 focuses on power and includes activities to deepen participants’ understanding of what power
UNIT
is, how it can be used and abused by individuals and groups, and the multiple sources of power that
5 exist (such as gender, race, age, religion, and class/caste) and how they intersect. Given that gender
is a significant source of power imbalances between men and women in all societies, we recommend
that some core gender topics are covered using activities from Units 2–4 before proceeding to Unit 5.
Unit 6 focuses on gender-based violence (GBV), with an emphasis on violence that occurs when
UNIT
6 men use their power over women in abusive and harmful ways. Activities in Unit 6 can have a greater
impact if some activities from Unit 5 are implemented directly beforehand.
Unit 7 focuses on sexual exploitation, abuse, and harassment (SEAH), including microaggressions,
UNIT
7 which can cause harm to individuals in work settings, especially women, and create unhealthy work
environments.
Units 8–9 contain activities that concentrate on behavioral change and skills development to nurture
healthy organizational cultures and secure work environments that are free from GBV. They also
UNITS
8-9 foster allyship and hone healthy interpersonal communication skills. Coming near the end of the
training, they build upon the content in previous modules that guided participants to an understanding
and internalization of how gender, power, violence, and sexuality interact.
Unit 10 includes activities that enable participants to make firm commitments to personal changes
UNIT
in their relationships, families, and work settings and to agree on action plans to strengthen gender
10
equality in their work environments.
When planning training events and choosing an appropriate set of activities from this training manual, consider the
The degree to which patriarchal models of gender norms, identities, roles, and relations are embedded in society/
culture and in the workplace’s organizational culture.
• Previous training in gender-related topics that participants might have had access to.
• Participants’ roles in the organization, in particular the formal hierarchical relationships that can influence their
willingness to openly discuss issues (like power or violence) that can be threatening or uncomfortable.
• Already identified gender equality priorities and/or areas of concern with the organization.
More information regarding the selection and training of facilitators can be found in Section 3.
When planning trainings, you should first be clear about the objectives of the session(s) and choose
activities accordingly, considering the recommended sequencing of units and activities as much as possible.
Activities may vary between target groups and may depend on participants’ level of knowledge of
gender equality principles and any trainings they have previously attended.
DAY 1 – MORNING
DAY 1 – AFTERNOON
Activity 4.2: The work we do and the value it’s given 90 minutes
Break
Activity 5.1: Exploring the meaning of power 90 minutes
DAY 2 – AFTERNOON
DAY 1 – MORNING
DAY 1 – AFTERNOON
DAY 2 – AFTERNOON
DAY 3 – MORNING
DAY 3 – AFTERNOON
DAY 4 – MORNING
TRAINING SIZE
Groups should not exceed more than 25 participants to ensure that everyone can actively participate.
There are distinct advantages, however, to carrying out trainings in an external venue where participants can
disconnect from the work environment, greater confidentiality can be achieved, and participants are not distracted
by having access to their workstations (to answer emails, for example).
Men-Only Spaces
In many company settings, due to male dominance in the industry, it may not always be feasible to work with
balanced mixed-gender groups, and it may be strategically important to organize some men-only sessions before
holding mixed-gender sessions. This is particularly pertinent in social and organizational contexts where resistance
to gender equality comes mostly from men or in which men do not often get the opportunity to reflect on gender
issues. Participation in men-only spaces can be an opportunity for men to reflect and discuss the issues on their
own, as a first step, before introducing mixed-gender spaces. Most of the activities in this training manual can be
used in men-only training spaces with minimal adaptation, and where appropriate, some tips have been provided
for doing so.
RECRUITING PARTICIPANTS
In recruiting participants, it is important to bear in mind not only the goals of raising awareness and fostering
individual and organizational changes across all levels of the organization but also the inclusion of staff members
who are already interested in the issues and can be influencers in their teams and offices as well as at the company
level. Similarly, you may decide to bring together staff of similar grades and roles to create a peer-to-peer
environment for the training.
Whether to include staff across the hierarchy of the organization, with varying roles and responsibilities (and
therefore with different types of authority and power), will depend on your assessment of people’s openness
to candid and constructive reflection, analysis, and sharing. It is important, however, to train middle and senior
management, not only junior staff; if only the latter receive training, they may be frustrated when trying to
implement change if their superiors are unsure of where they are coming from and/or feel threatened.
In companies that are very hierarchical, it may be advisable to train senior managers separately to give them a
chance to speak up on issues without compromising their role. At the same time, separate trainings for junior staff
can help them open up about challenges and issues in their organization without the presence of senior employees.
In pitching the training to staff, it is strategic and wise to emphasize the idea of the proposed training sessions
fostering and strengthening “personal and professional growth” and/or “healthy work environments” in aspirational
language that emphasizes staff ’s proactive engagement and builds on their identification with the goals and values of
the organization.
When considering incentives for participation, be guided by the practices that are common in your organization. For
example, if the training lasts a full day, it might be customary to provide lunch and other snacks for the participants
and provide transport if the training takes place in an external venue.
• Before the training ends, encourage participants to form a support network to continue to meet and support each
other as participants.
• Identify participants who display the skills and motivation to be facilitators and equip them to facilitate new groups
in their workplaces.
• Encourage participants to create their own action teams to mobilize other work colleagues and to develop
awareness-raising and informational activities with their teams and across the organization.
• Collaborate with senior management to encourage participation, provide staff with time to participate, and link
performance to staff key performance indicators.
• Learning begins with the experience and knowledge of the participants, as opposed to an established theory
or set of knowledge.
• The educational approach is learner-centered and aims to reinforce learners’ self-esteem and self-confidence
and to develop a positive, realistic self-concept.
• After the participants have shared and critically analyzed their own experiences, they look for general
commonalities and patterns.
• New information from different sources (including outside experts, specialized texts, and documentaries
or other films) is then introduced to deepen analysis and stimulate the collective creation of new ideas and
reinterpretation of existing knowledge.
• Participants then apply what they have learned. In ongoing processes of change that need continuous
monitoring and evaluation, they practice new skills and develop strategies and action plans to transform those
aspects of their reality that they have identified as unjust and as obstacles to their basic rights.
The use of experiential learning approaches and participatory methodologies aligns with gender-transformative
programming that actively targets discriminatory and harmful practices, stereotypes, and norms and seeks to
transform underlying gender inequalities.
Gender-transformative programs move beyond the individual level to also address the interpersonal,
sociocultural, structural, systemic, and community factors that influence gender-related attitudes and behaviors.
Individual attitude and behavior change does not happen in isolation; larger social, political, and economic forces
drive societal and individual change around gender relations, gender power relations, and masculinities. For this
reason, gender-transformative approaches must aim to effect change at multiple levels of society.
This training manual focuses on transformation at the individual, interpersonal, and systemic levels as well as
changes to the inequitable aspects of workplace environments and organizational cultures.
8 Text adapted from Amnesty International, Facilitation Manual, and Equimundo, Manhood 2.0.
When working with mixed-gender groups, it is highly recommended that the facilitation team has a man and
a woman facilitator who can model respectful and equitable gender relations to the group.
All-men and all-women groups should be facilitated respectively by facilitators of the same gender as the
participants to maximize trust, minimize participants’ resistance, and create an atmosphere conducive to
processes of experiential learning.
In general, the following criteria and qualities should be used when choosing facilitators:
Facilitator Criteria
1. Strong communications skills—this means being both an engaging speaker and an engaged/active listener.
3. Interest in working with members of the organization on issues related to engaging men to support gender
equality.
Facilitator Qualities
1. Ability to guide discussion and enable everyone to participate.
2. Ability to respond constructively to challenging topics that may bring out resistance.
3. Ability to make others feel safe and comfortable discussing sensitive topics.
4. Has the respect of coworkers and a good reputation in the company (this does not exclude junior staff from
being facilitators but should be a consideration).
A major challenge for facilitators accustomed to knowledge-based curricula is how to unlearn top-down models
of “teaching” in favor of a more dynamic, group-centered approach. As such, the following are additional
recommendations for selecting facilitators:
• Choose facilitators who are respected but relatable; facilitators from the same organization may be more
accepted (although in some settings, facilitation and information provided by “outsiders” may be more
accepted) and less likely to move away or drop out.
• Avoid selecting facilitators in positions of authority who might threaten or limit active participation.
• When training other facilitators, allow enough time for facilitators to transform their own perceptions and
practices and to master the content of the training manual.
• Make sure that trainings include an overview of local laws and organizational policies regarding GBV, including
sexual harassment (SH) prevention and response, other related issues such as discrimination and equal
opportunities, and information on local support services and resources.
TRAINING FACILITATORS
In general, plan for facilitator trainings to last at least five to ten days.
The trainings should allow trainee facilitators the chance to see how each activity should be implemented (with
experienced facilitators modeling the activities), an opportunity to practice the activities themselves, and time to
develop bespoke agendas that they will implement within their own organizations.
You may also want to consider graduated or cascading facilitation structures, whereby a select group of
participants graduate to become facilitators, replacing or alleviating some of the workload of existing facilitators.
The quality of group education can only be as good as the quality of the training and ongoing support provided
to the facilitators. Remember that they will be interacting with participants on a regular basis, providing support,
and sometimes listening to difficult stories. This can be challenging, exhausting, and emotionally draining. Without
adequate support, it will be harder to retain and motivate facilitators in the long term.
• Make sure not to overburden facilitators with too many groups, constant travel, or lots of paperwork.
Be considerate and calculate the amount of time a facilitator puts into preparing for, implementing, and
monitoring the intervention.
• If certain tasks are too time-consuming, work with the facilitators to simplify the programmatic and
administrative procedures.
• Ensure facilitators are provided with (and do not struggle to obtain) the materials needed to successfully
implement the intervention—in some settings, this might include materials that might not be obvious
or available.
• Incentivize facilitators by offering financial remuneration and/or other recognition if the trainings they
deliver are outside of or additional to their role/scope of work. Similarly, their contribution to the company
can be taken into consideration during performance evaluations and/or as part of salary increase or
promotion decisions.
FACILITATION GUIDELINES10
SEE YOURSELF AS A FACILITATOR, NOT A TEACHER
The role of the facilitator is to create an open and respectful environment and a safe space in which
participants can feel comfortable sharing and learning from each other. You do not have to be a gender equality
expert and do not need to have all the answers.
The role of the facilitator is to promote reflection and participatory learning, present information neutrally,
and create a horizontal learning experience where the participants can learn from each other and from active
participation in the activities. To this end, ask questions to better understand where participants are coming
from and guide them in group reflections to look critically at discriminatory practices as well as harmful norms
around gender.
Be aware of your position of power; accordingly, avoid judgmental and authoritarian attitudes. Never impose
your feelings or opinions on the group and do not aim to instill fear, because participants can often “switch off ”
their emotions, interest, or engagement with the topic or feel paralyzed while participating. Always be conscious
of the language you use and the messages you present to the participants.
Review your own views, assumptions, and prejudices, and avoid bringing them to the group. Be aware of
whether participants from particular social, cultural, or religious backgrounds trigger certain emotions in you—
positive or negative—that may affect your own work in the group.
Include as much physical movement as possible so that participants remain active, alert, and interested.
Many of the themes in the training manual are complex and sensitive. During sessions, pay attention to the
participants’ comfort level. In some cases, you may need to refer individuals to professional services such
as counseling. Before you facilitate any session, it is essential that you have a list of available resources for
participants should they need additional assistance. It is also imperative that all facilitators are well versed in local
laws on GBV and other relevant, connected issues; confidentiality; and mandatory reporting. It is important to
Changing attitudes and behaviors is a long process. Participation in these activities will not necessarily lead to an
immediate transformation of participants’ lives and relationships or of the organization. However, it is a big step
toward promoting personal change.
Prepare the space. Always arrange chairs in a circle unless otherwise noted. It is recommended that
participants be offered some type of refreshment and engage in physical activity and motion during the sessions.
Beverages and food tend to be highly valued by participants and help them stay in the group process. You can
use masking tape to hang flip chart papers created during the activities and discussions in visible places to remind
participants of key topics.
Check in at the beginning of each session. It is important to begin each training session by warmly
welcoming back the group and checking in. A check-in provides time for group participants to share any thoughts
and comments they have had based on the discussion from the last session and to share personal experiences
related to their efforts to implement changes. To preserve time for the session activities, keep check-ins brief,
without responses or discussion—check-ins should not last more than ten minutes.
Review the group agreements. Most of the training sessions will ask group participants to share personal
experiences. To create a safe space, at the beginning of every training session, review the ground rules that
were established by the group in Activity 1.4 Creating a safe place. This promotes trust and confidentiality
within the group.
Carry out the activity—but be flexible and creative and contextualize activities. Each activity
contains procedures to take the group through exercises and group discussion questions to prompt critical
reflection. The proposed structure should serve as a general guide; it is not necessary to apply it exactly. You
can change the order of some activities’ steps or adapt the examples to make them more relevant to your
group’s reality and to reflect your own knowledge and skills.
Where possible, add examples from your daily life and experiences; this will help participants become
emotionally involved and identify more closely with the material. Sharing personal experiences also helps to
model the behavior you want from the participants. Be careful, though, not to stray too far from the training
manual, as this can prevent you from reaching the training sessions’ objectives.
Use icebreakers and energizers. Icebreakers are short activities that help participants build trust in the
group, usually in a lighthearted way. They are a great way to open a session, allowing participants to move
around, share, and become comfortable with one another.
Energizers are short activities that are most helpful when the group appears to have low energy, lose interest,
or fail to respond to the activity. They help to change the routine, get people in motion, and relieve fatigue and
boredom. They take only a few minutes. Examples can be found in Annex A.
Check out at the end of each training session. End each training session with a check-out that emphasizes
some of the key messages or lessons that they learned during that session. Use this time to reflect on the main
conclusions of the day, to announce the next activities, or to see what can be improved and what worked well.
A check-out is also an opportunity to deal with lingering emotions, if present. It is important to provide adequate
time for the check-out, especially in modules that are more sensitive.
Ask questions that promote dialogue. See your group as a process. Ask “process questions” that stimulate
participants to reflect more, cannot be answered with a “yes” or “no,” and
are unbiased.
For example, rather than asking “Do you think sexual harassment occurs in your workspace?” formulate the
question in a way that will not get a simple yes-or-no answer: “What do you think about the organization’s
policy on sexual harassment? How well is it implemented?”
Likewise, keep questions simple and to the point, using “When?” “Where?” “What?” “How?” “Who?” and
“Why?” as much as possible and continuing with a full sentence. For example: “What were you thinking when
that happened?” or “Why do you think that is?”
Beware of leading or biased questions. Instead of asking something like: “In order to be a good colleague, will
you talk to your other male colleagues about allyship with women?” try “What actions will you take with your male
colleagues to promote allyship with women in the organization?”
Be conscious of your own biases; make an effort to leave your feelings and values out of the questions, and
instead guide participants in identifying problems and solutions.
Creating and maintaining a welcoming and safe environment. Ask participants to decide on a set of
agreements and remind them of those agreements throughout the sessions. Important group agreements relate
to listening to and showing respect for others (for example, not talking when others are speaking, not making
rude comments, or not talking on the phone) as well as confidentiality and participation.
Avoid being judgmental. Remember, your role is to facilitate discussion and reflection. Your role is not to
teach or punish anyone. Be friendly and create a good rapport with your participants. Be aware of your own
position of power—avoid judgmental and authoritarian attitudes. Never impose your feelings or opinions on
the group.
Promote inclusion. Ensure that all participants have the opportunity to speak. Be careful not to let one
person dominate the conversation or make other people feel that they cannot share their opinions. Encourage
people to share their experiences and learn to identify when people want to speak but may be too shy to say
something unless called on.
If a participant begins to take over a group by speaking too long, find an opening and kindly say, “It sounds like you
have a lot of valuable experiences to share with the group. That’s great! Do others have similar or different stories they
would also like to share?”
Address participants’ concerns. Training sessions can serve as an important opportunity for participants
to receive help and advice. As a facilitator, it is important that you validate people’s concerns, but you can also
engage the larger group in helping to propose solutions. Ask the group, “How do you think this concern could be
resolved?” or “Has anyone faced a similar situation? What did you do?” Avoid giving unsolicited advice!
Know and use referral services. Some situations or challenges that participants face may require outside
support. In addition, some participants may prefer to discuss a particular topic, obtain information, or seek
support outside of a group setting, or they may need attention from a specialized service provider. As a
facilitator, you should be knowledgeable about services and resources to which you can refer participants
if needed.
Manage conflicts respectfully. If a conflict arises among the group, or if a participant shares a discriminatory
view, remind the participants of the group agreement. Encourage other members to help mediate the situation.
Ask the group what they think about the question or how they would suggest handling the situation. When
necessary, you can offer brief responses to questions and clarify misinformation.
Appreciate honesty and openness. Encourage participants to be honest and open. They should not be
afraid to discuss sensitive issues for fear of ridicule from their peers. Thank the group members for sharing their
personal stories. Never force anyone to participate in the activities. Instead, try to create an environment in
which the participants feel comfortable.
Promote movement and interaction. Include as much physical movement as possible so that participants
remain active, alert, and interested. Use short energizer activities in between activities to keep the participants
engaged in the topics you are discussing.
Be respectful in your presence and appearance. Try to be as respectful as possible in your appearance
and your nonverbal and verbal presentation. This includes dressing in a professional manner and addressing
individual participants with respect (work on remembering their names—a simple name game can help with
that). Avoid emotional reactions and ensure you understand the point a participant wanted to make.
Be careful of topics that may re-traumatize a participant. Given the sensitivity of some issues in the
training manual, it is possible that some participants will bring up personal experiences of trauma or abuse. It
is important that at the beginning of each session, you remind participants that they are welcome to leave the
room if they feel uncomfortable. No one is required to share any sensitive information.
Also remind participants of the resources that are available to them and that you are available after the session
to talk further. Refer participants to service providers with whom they can discuss any issues they may be having.
Keep a list of locally available services, including persons trained specifically in addressing GBV. It is also helpful to
go over the ground rules (group agreements) about respecting confidentiality in the group setting and remind the
participants not to share any personal information that they do not want revealed outside of the group.
Keep discussions from going too far from the key messages. One of the main facilitator tools you can
use is the “bank,” also known as the “parking lot.” While all discussions are welcome, if a participant brings up a
topic that cannot be addressed within the time allotted, write it on a flip chart labeled “bank” or “parking lot.” It
is important that these topics be revisited at another time. However, if the topic is completely unrelated to the
training manual, you can say something like, “That’s a great comment.We don’t have time to address that right now,
but let’s talk more about it after the session.”
As a facilitator, you can use your personal experience with taboo subjects strategically to stimulate the
participants to open up and take part in the learning process more fully.
You should always challenge contentious or outrageous statements and enable participants to unpack the
prejudices that lie behind such statements. Avoid entering into direct conflict or “tit-for-tat” arguments with
individual participants; instead, invite them to explain why they feel that way. When they have done so, ask
the group if they agree or if they have other opinions or perspectives on the issue. If not, offer an alternative
opinion to stimulate debate and discussion. At the end of the discussion, cite statistics or concrete examples,
if possible, to clarify the issue, but without humiliating or putting down the participant(s) who made the
contentious statement.
In most cases, especially when statements relate to ingrained cultural stereotypes, norms, and phobias, is
very unlikely that participants will openly and immediately change their opinion. However, by challenging the
statement as facilitator, you will provide an alternative point of view that the participants will be more likely to
consider and, hopefully, adopt at a later period.
Dealing with feelings and emotions. Before beginning to use this training manual, compile a list of available
emotional support resources within the company and externally to which you can refer participants if necessary.
Remembering and sharing past experiences can arouse a vast array of emotions in and between participants,
and they should feel able to express these freely. So, too, can reflecting on and analyzing situations of abuse
of power, violence, and discrimination. When participants do share emotional personal stories, show your
appreciation, understanding, and empathy.
For some participants, these conversations can result in feelings of sadness, anger, guilt, and shame that they may
express by crying. Do not be afraid of allowing participants to share their emotions or to cry. Acknowledge the
emotion that they are sharing and empathize with the participant(s). It is important to let them share, but also to
move on and maintain the flow of the activity. If any participants need assistance, you may want to speak to them
afterward to provide information about where they can seek support, referring to the list of resources compiled.
Openness and honesty in sharing feelings and emotions are indicative of an environment of trust and confidence
and are crucial in achieving cohesion within the group. They are also fundamental to acknowledging the damage
and hurt that violence and discrimination cause to individuals, teams, and work environments.
This section presents facilitator guidance for planning and carrying out monitoring, evaluation, and learning while
implementing the activities in this manual.
As a first step, the working group can carry out a SWOT analysis of the organization’s capacity to implement the
training manual.13 This will inform the following elements of the action plan:
• Outcomes (expected results) that will occur as a result of executing the action plan.
• Selection and description of the activities from the training manual that will be used, the audience, and the
frequency of implementation (output-level information).
Similarly, the action plan can also include other interventions across the organization to complement and
reinforce the activities in the manual, such as internal communications plans and awareness-raising campaigns.
If you have access to external, donor-funded implementation or technical support, you can also include that in
your action plan.
12 Text adapted from Equimundo, Manhood 2.0 and the original outline for a gender-transformative male engagement methodology targeting selected staff
of organizations participating in USAID’s Engendering Industries project, prepared by Patrick Welsh, May 11, 2021.
13 A SWOT analysis identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
• The timeframe for carrying out the action plan. For example: a six-month period with four workshops and
one seminar each month.
• The number and types of methods that will be used to implement the training manual and their duration.
For example: 24 half-day workshops and 6 two-hour seminars.
• The activities from the training manual that will be used in each of the methods selected. For example: For
the half-day workshops: Activity 1.3: Objectives and expectations; Activity 1.4: Creating a safe place; Activity
2.4: Gender fishbowl; Activity 4.2: The work we do and the value it’s given.
• The number of the participants in each activity and their gender distribution. For example: 20 participants in
each workshop and in each seminar (60 percent men and 40 percent women).
• The target groups within the organization with whom activities will be implemented. For example: workshops
with male and female middle-management staff from different departments across the organization
(technical, operational, administrative, etc.); seminars with senior management.
• The resources you will need—human, economic (budget), and technical. For example: number of trained
facilitators, funds for materials and refreshments, internal technical and operational support needed (and
external if feasible).
The action plan should also include the principal expected outcomes (results). These should be linked to
the overall goal of the training manual (see The Goal of This Training Manual), to the specific training manual
activities that you have included in the action plan, and to other awareness-raising actions that will take place
across the organization.
The anticipated outcomes of implementing this training manual are increased knowledge, skills, and abilities
among participants.
• “Knowledge” refers to the subjects, topics, and items of information that a participant should know after
completing the training.
• “Skills” refers to the technical or manual proficiencies that the participants should have learned or acquired
after completing the training.
• “Abilities” refers to the capacity to apply knowledge and skills simultaneously, which participants should be
able to demonstrate after completing the training. It may also refer to personal or social attributes or talents
that a trainee may possess.
Some examples of possible outcomes related to increased knowledge, skills, and abilities are included below.
• Participants will increase their knowledge of the links between harmful gender stereotypes and norms, and
sexual harassment in the workplace.
• Participants will increase their skills for building a safe work environment.
• Participants will increase their ability to be an ally for gender equality in the workplace.
• Increased belief that gender is socially constructed and not genetically determined.
• Rejection of the idea that men are genetically predisposed to using violence.
• Increase in support for equal opportunities for women and men in leadership roles.
MONITORING
Regular monitoring helps to answer output-level questions such as how many sessions were conducted and
how many participants attended each session.
The purpose of regular monitoring is to understand the immediate results or outputs of the implementation
process and to help implementers and/or facilitators identify challenges, barriers, opportunities, and unexpected
impacts as the intervention is being rolled out.
MONITORING OUTPUTS
At the bare minimum, the working group should aim to monitor outputs, using performance indicators that will
help show what is being done (for example, number or percentage of facilitators trained, number of participants
recruited, and number of training sessions carried out).
Output indicators can typically be monitored using data collection tools and supporting documentation such as
attendance sheets and photos/descriptions of training activities.
Facilitators can also carry out a self-appraisal of their own performance after each training session by discussing
together what went well, which aspects of the content and methodology they had difficulties with, and what they
did (and can do) to overcome those difficulties. Doing so enables them to identify areas where they can improve
and areas where they may need some additional support.
If a working group member (or someone else) is supervising a training session, it can be useful for the facilitators
to share their self-appraisal reflections with the supervisor before the supervisor gives them feedback on their
performance as facilitators.
3. Assessing the quality of the implementation process itself, including the effectiveness of the facilitation.
• Because people are giving their time and effort to participate, it is your responsibility to understand whether the
program has any kind of positive or negative impact.
• Even though evidence of change from similar programs exists already, it is important to ensure that the specifics
of your adaptation and implementation are also working.
• You cannot assume that because an activity worked in a different context, with another population, or even
when implemented by a different organization, that it will work again in the same way.
• You can learn what is working or not working, identify challenges and gaps in your intervention, and adjust it
accordingly.
What to evaluate and how are guided by the outcomes in the action plan and the actual training manual activities
implemented in a given timeframe. It is important to be strategic and consider practical constraints such as
• The length of time participants can spend filling out or responding to your questions; and
Here is an example of pre- and post-test tool questions for a training session that includes Activities 2.3, 3.1,
and 4.1:
• I am able to explain how values, attitudes, and beliefs affect how we behave and our expectations of men and
women (Activity 2.3).
• I agree that social institutions play a role in teaching patriarchal gender roles (Activity 3.1).
• I understand how gender roles influence the distribution of care work within the household and workplace
(Activity 4.1).
You can adapt the pre- and post-test items to speak to the cultural and training context, if necessary. It is
If you decide to measure shifts in gender-related attitudes, you can do so by including key attitude-related
statements in the first pretest at the start of the first training session and in the post-test at the end of the final
training session.
Annex B.4 contains a set of possible attitude-related statements that you can consider for pre- and post-test
surveys. Each statement is linked to one or more of the units in the training manual, meaning that it is more likely
that positive shifts will occur if activities from those units have been implemented as part of the training process.
The attitude-related statements require the same responses as the knowledge, skills, and ability items. Similarly, the
second column (which indicates the units to which the gender-related attitude statements are linked) are for your
guidance only. You should not include them in the pre- and post-test tool you provide to participants.
Here are examples of pre- and post-test gender-related statements you could use for a training process that
includes activities from Units 2, 3, and 4:
• Some jobs are best done by men because of their physical makeup.
• A woman’s most important role is to take care of her home and family.
See Annex B.5 for questions you can use and suggestions on how to apply them.
• To assess their overall satisfaction with the trainings, the facilitation styles, techniques and methods used, and
group participation.
• To reflect on new knowledge acquired and its usefulness for life and work situations.
• To identify changes that have occurred and others that can be implemented in participants’ day-to-day lives and
in the professional sphere.
14 Taken and adapted from evaluation tools developed by Women’s Refugee Commission and Mercy Corps in Nigeria, 2020.
LEARNING
Facilitators can organize periodic debriefing sessions (face-to-face or online) with other facilitators to provide
a platform to share reflections on what has worked well (and not so well), analyze challenges they have faced,
articulate lessons learned, and propose solutions. These sessions can also boost facilitators’ confidence and
ownership of the training processes. The qualitative data from monitoring visits, facilitators’ self-appraisal exercises,
and participants’ evaluations are important inputs for the debriefing sessions.
Facilitators can also set up a semiformal community of practice, such as a WhatsApp group, through which
they can share learnings and insights and can support each other with planning and executing activities using the
training manual.
Facilitators could also connect to the MenEngage Alliance network in their region and/or country for additional
peer-to-peer learning opportunities.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 30 minutes
KEY MESSAGES: This is the start of a journey of reflection and learning for personal growth that will help us
strengthen our work environments as safe and equitable spaces.
MATERIALS: None.
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
PROCEDURE:
Getting to Know Each Other (20 minutes)
1. Warmly welcome participants to the training.
2. Introduce the process:
Today we begin an incredible journey together. It is a journey of self-reflection, growth, and change for us as individuals
and for our workplace environment.We will grow stronger, better, and healthier, and our workplace environments will
become safer and more equitable.
Each of us brings something unique to this space—our character, our ideas, and our experiences.Your contributions
are what will enrich this process and give it meaning.Therefore, it is important that we get to know each other (more)
and that we get comfortable together as we embark upon this journey together.
3. Ask participants to form pairs and have an in-depth discussion about the four points below. Explain to
participants that after the discussion, they will each introduce their colleague to the group, so it is important
to listen carefully.
• Tell each other their names and what work they do in the organization.
• Share things about the organization and their role in it that they feel good about or that inspire them.
• Discuss what they each feel they can bring to the training that will benefit others (a skill, talent, attitude,
approach, experience, etc.).
• Discuss what they are expecting to get out of the training.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Highlight that although we have many differences, we also have many things in
common. One of those things is that we all work for the same organization and want to contribute to making
our work environments safe, friendly, and equitable.
Keep your eyes open for more outgoing participants who may dominate the conversation; try to moderate their
participation without making them feel censored.
Keep a steady pace and a lighthearted atmosphere to help break the ice.
If you want to introduce an initial element of gender analysis to this activity, you can also get the participants in
their pairs to talk about the following:
1. What’s something you have done to support gender equality that you’re proud of ?
2. As a child or teenager, when did you first realize there were differences between genders?
3. As an adult, has there been a time when you experienced being stereotyped with assumptions that don’t fit how
you define yourself?
4. What do you most like about working for the organization? How does your organization treat women?
How does it treat other people affected by harmful stereotypes like those related to race and ethnicity,
age, and class?
With large groups, this activity can be time-consuming, so it is necessary to think about how much time you have
for the full training. You can reduce the number of questions that pairs reflect on if necessary.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 30 minutes
OBJECTIVES: By the end of the activity, participants will be able to state their expectations for the training.
KEY MESSAGES: Expectations can be varied and related to the thematic content, methodology, relations,
outcomes, and process.
PREPARATION:
• Prepare two flip charts, one with the title “What’s Exciting/Interesting!” and the other with the title “What
Concerns Us.”
• Have a large stack of small blank cards or papers available (approximately A5 size), enough for at least four
per participant.
• Put markers and piles of A5 cards on the tables or floor near participants.
PROCEDURE:
1. Explain that you are going to divide into pairs, women paired with women and men paired with men. In pairs,
participants will reflect upon and answer the following questions:
a. What interests or excites you about this course?
b. What concerns you about this course?
2. Pairs will have five minutes to respond to the questions. Each pair should come up with at least one answer
per question and write their answers on the cards provided (one answer per card). Encourage participants to
respond in relation to their personal and professional interests and concerns. Once they are finished, they can
hang their cards on the corresponding flip charts.
3. Ask participants to divide into same-sex pairs by finding the person sitting closest to them who is the same
sex. Assist as needed, make sure that everyone has cards and markers, and let them know that it’s time
to begin.
4. Call out when there is one minute left and when time is up. Ensure that all participants have hung their cards
on the corresponding flip charts.
5. Walk to the “What’s Exciting/Interesting!” flip chart. Read participants’ responses and try to draw out
similarities and unique elements. Take comments or questions from participants.
6. Move to the “What Concerns Us” flip chart. Read participants’ concerns. Try to group them into similar
categories.
7. For each of the main concerns, ask participants what you can do as the facilitator and what they can do as
participants to address that concern. Take one or two responses for each.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Highlight that our expectations can be varied, pointing out those that are related
to the thematic content, methodology, relations, outcomes, and process.
Acknowledge any expectations that go beyond the scope of the training, recognizing their importance but
clarifying that they will not be part of the upcoming training process.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: If and how you use this activity will depend on how much time you
have for the training process. If time is limited, you can integrate steps to get an idea of participants’
expectations into Activity 1.1 or 1.3.
Aim to create an upbeat atmosphere by maximizing participation and enabling discussion and dialogue.
If there are many concerns, talk with the participants about how to address those concerns constructively.
Try not to overemphasize concerns in ways that might undermine the process or predispose the participants
to feeling unnecessarily anxious about the trainings they will take part in.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 20 minutes
KEY MESSAGES: This training is part of a process that aims to enhance men’s engagement in gender equality
issues within organizations supported by USAID’s Engendering Industries program.
MATERIALS: Laptop, projector, flip chart paper, markers, and masking tape
PREPARATION: If you will not be using a PowerPoint presentation, write the profile of Engendering Industries
and the objectives of this training on flip chart paper or print them out and give copies to the participants.
You will need to prepare the specific objectives and agenda for this training process (workshop or series of
workshops) and can print them out to give to the participants or use PowerPoint to project them.
PROCEDURE:
Profile of Engendering Industries17
1. Use the following information to familiarize the participants with Engendering Industries:
a. USAID’s Engendering Industries program works with organizations in male-dominated industries to
increase economic opportunities for women and improve gender equality, diversity, and inclusion in
the workplace.
b. Expanding women’s participation in male-dominated sectors leads to tangible economic empowerment
outcomes for women, such as formal employment opportunities and higher incomes.
c. Increased gender equality improves business performance and helps organizations meet their bottom-line
goals by enhancing employee satisfaction, reducing turnover, and driving productivity.
d. Well-functioning organizations create s fuel economic growth, bolster economies, catalyze social
development, and create an enabling environment for private investment.18
e. Sociocultural norms, education and training gaps, and the inability of women to balance work and
caregiver responsibilities are some of the limiting factors that negatively impact women’s workforce
participation.
f. Engendering Industries has partnered with 67 organizations across 38 countries.
g. Engendering Industries is advancing men’s engagement by carrying out workshops on creating men allies
for gender equality. These allies advocate for gender equality initiatives and also understand how gender
equality benefits both women and men.
Logistics
1. Go through any logistical/administrative issues with the participants (for example, health and safety, access to
toilets, use of training center facilities, mealtimes/venue).
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Highlight that this training is the beginning of a process, and that by the end of
the training, participants will make commitments to carrying out concrete actions that help enhance gender
equality in their homes, communities, and workplaces.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: As you present the objectives and agenda to the participants, bear in mind
that different groups of trainees’ specific interests and needs can make it necessary to be flexible with the
timing of some of the activities. Try not to go too far over time with the first activities, though. You will
find that you will be able to deal with some issues that come up in more detail as the activities progress.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 45 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To maximize participation and enable people to express their ideas, experiences, and feelings, it is
important to agree on how to create and manage a safe space characterized by mutual respect and trust.
KEY MESSAGES: This training is part of a process that aims to enhance men’s engagement in gender equality
issues within organizations supported by USAID’s Engendering Industries program.
PREPARATION: On a blank piece of flip chart paper, write the title “Characteristics of a Safe Space.”
On a second flip chart, write the title “Discussion Questions” and the following questions:
• Why is this important?
• What makes this challenging to do?
• How can we overcome those challenges?
• What can we commit to as a group to make sure that our space maintains this quality for everyone?
PROCEDURE:
Introduction
1. Conduct a small energizer if necessary to motivate or center the group.
2. Explain: In this activity, we will explore how we can make the upcoming training process a safe space for all of
us to share our ideas, feelings, and experiences.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Remind the participants that maintaining a safe space is a shared responsibility and
that there will be moments during the process when we will remind ourselves of the commitments made just
now and add any other proposals as necessary.
If your training time is limited, instead of the procedure proposed above, you can simply brainstorm “ground rules”
(or group agreements) with the participants to ensure the smooth functioning of the upcoming process, create a safe
space, and maximize participation.
Engendering
Industries Change
Management Coach
Khumo Mokhethi
(second from left) and
Equimundo: Center
for Masculinities
and Social Justice
Facilitator Douglas
Mendoza (third from
left) meet with training
participants from
EDENORTE during an
Engendering Industries
Engaging Men for
Gender Equality
training event in the
Dominican Republic
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
OBJECTIVES: To discuss the differences between sex and gender and to reflect on how gender norms influence
the lives and relationships of men and women.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Although there are biological differences between males and females, many of the differences we attribute to
men and women are constructed by our society.
• These differences are not part of our biology; we are not born this way.
• These characteristics can be learned from key socializing entities such as family members, friends, cultural and
religious institutions, traditional and social media, and school, and they can be reinforced in the workplace.
PREPARATION: Prepare two flip chart papers with the titles “Man” and “Woman.”
PROCEDURE:
PART 1
1. Explain to the participants that this activity will help them think about the gender attributes and roles assigned
to men and women and how society influences our ideas and expectations of being women and men.
2. Hang two pieces of flip chart paper titled “man” and “woman” on the wall.
3. Ask the participants what it means to “be a man” within their usual context or society.
4. Write down the words and phrases they say on the flip chart paper that says “man.” Explain that the responses
can be positive or negative and that the participants should think of both biological aspects and social
characteristics.
5. After everyone has responded, ask the group what it means to “be a woman” within their usual context or
society.
6. Write down these words and phrases on the flip chart paper that says “woman.” Remind them to think of
both biological and social characteristics.
PART 3
1. Now, open the discussion using the questions below. Help the group discuss which characteristics the
participants do not think can be attributed to both men and women and why. However, make sure not to
present these sex and gender categories as inflexible or unchanging.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Keep in mind that some participants may show some resistance to
the idea of gender, particularly if they hold conservative religious beliefs. While acknowledging the
biological differences that exist between men and women, you can use a human rights framework to
support the idea that inequalities between women’s and men’s roles are social and cultural. The issue is not about
men and women being the same but about having equal opportunities and rights.
Some participants may introduce the idea of intersex people. If so, use the following information to clarify what
intersex means:
“Intersex people are born with sex characteristics (including genitals, gonads, and chromosome patterns) that do not fit
typical binary notions of male or female bodies.
‘Intersex’ is an umbrella term used to describe a wide range of natural bodily variations. In some cases, intersex traits
are visible at birth, while in others, they are not apparent until puberty. Some chromosomal intersex variations may not
be physically apparent at all. According to experts, between 0.05 percent and 1.7 percent of the population is born with
intersex traits; the upper estimate is similar to the number of red-haired people.
Being intersex relates to biological sex characteristics and is distinct from a person’s sexual orientation or gender identity.
An intersex person may be straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, or asexual and may identify as female, male, both, or neither.
Because their bodies are seen as different, intersex children and adults are often stigmatized and subjected to multiple
human rights violations, including violations of their rights to health and physical integrity, to be free from torture and ill-
treatment, and to equality and non-discrimination.”22
For more information, see the Intersex Fact Sheet prepared by the UN Free and Equal campaign and the article
“Sex Redefined.”23
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
OBJECTIVES:
• To deepen understanding of “sex” and “gender” and to be able to differentiate clearly between the two
concepts.
• To comprehend the terms “gender equality” and “gender equity” and their implications for relationships
between men and women.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Sex comprises the biological characteristics that define humans as female or male. While these sets of
biological characteristics are not mutually exclusive, as there are individuals who possess both, they tend
to differentiate humans as males and females. (Source: Engendering Industries Delivering Gender Equality:
A Best Practices Framework for Male-Dominated Industries)
• Gender is a socially constructed set of rules, responsibilities, entitlements, and behaviors associated with
being a man, a woman, or a gender-diverse individual, and the relationships between and among people
according to these constructs. These social definitions and their consequences differ among and within
cultures, change over time, and intersect with other factors (e.g., age, class, disability, ethnicity, race, religion,
citizenship, and sexual orientation). Though these concepts are linked, the term gender is not interchangeable
with the terms “women,” “sex,” “gender identity,” or “gender expression.” (Source: USAID 2023 Gender
Equality and Women’s Empowerment Policy)
• Gender equality is the equal enjoyment of human rights, socially valued goods, opportunities, and resources
by all individuals, independent of a person’s sex or gender identity. Gender equality means more than parity
in numbers or laws on the books; it means that all people have equal access and freedoms and that rights,
responsibilities, and opportunities do not depend on an individual’s sex assigned at birth or their gender
identity. Gender equality is fundamental in human development for all women and girls, men and boys, and
individuals of other gender identities. It is both a human rights issue and a precondition for, and an indicator
of, sustainable development. (Source: USAID CARE-GBV Foundational Elements for Gender-Based Violence
Programming in Development Glossary)
Gender equity is the process of reaching equality and fairness for women and men, boys and girls. To ensure
fairness, equity measures or interventions must compensate for cumulative economic, social, and political
disadvantages that prevent women and men, boys and girls from operating on a level playing field. (Source:
Interagency Gender Working Group, Gender-Related Terms and Definitions)
PREPARATION: One copy per participant of Participant Handout 1: “The Sex and Gender Game.”
5. Ask the group to discuss whether gender equality and/or gender equity exist in their workplace/organization,
community, and/or country. If it is helpful, provide one example of gender equality and gender equity in their
context to confirm they understand the difference between the two concepts.
• As the group discusses this question, write down any statements that explain why women do not share equal
opportunities, rights, and access to and control of resources with men in all spheres of society. Be sure to
include some of the following points if they are not mentioned by the group:
• Girls and boys, men and women, are socialized differently in many societies, which limits their
opportunities and choices with regard to education and access to certain jobs and paid work in general.
• In many countries, girls and women are underrepresented in secondary or tertiary education due to
missing support from parents.
• Women in many countries are more likely to experience sexual and domestic violence than men.
• Men are paid more than women for the same work (in most cases).
• Men hold more positions of power within the business sector.
• Women in many countries carry the burden of domestic and care work.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Sex is a fact of human biology; most of us are born male or female; it is men
who impregnate and women who conceive, give birth, and breastfeed the human baby.
We have constructed an edifice of social attitudes and assumptions, behaviors, and activities based on this
biological difference: these are our gender roles and identities.
Gender equality does not mean that men and women will or should be the same, but rather that they should
have the same opportunities, rights, and access to resources and services.
Gender equality also means that people should be free to decide how they want to express their identity and
that they should not be limited or defined by their sex; people should not feel obliged to reproduce narrow,
limited visions of “masculinity” and “femininity.”
If a discussion has arisen on the concept of being intersex: Some intersex people are not easily identifiable as
male or female when they are born; others reach childhood or puberty before discovering that they have
elements of both biological sexes. See the facilitators’ notes below for more information.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Some participants may challenge, quite rightly, the idea that only two
sexes exist if they have already had contact with the concept of intersex people. If so, acknowledge the
existence of intersex people, some of whom are not easily identifiable as male or female when they are
born, and some of whom discover at or before puberty that they have elements of both biological sexes.
You can use the following information from the UN Free and Equal Campaign Intersex Fact Sheet to expand
participants’ understanding of intersexuality.
• “According to experts, between 0.05% and 1.7% of the population is born with intersex traits – the upper estimate is
similar to the number of red-haired people.”
“Discrimination: Intersex persons are often subjected to discrimination and abuse if it becomes known that they
are intersex or if they are perceived not to conform to gender norms. Anti-discrimination laws do not typically ban
“Because their bodies are seen as different, intersex children and adults are often stigmatized and subjected to multiple
human rights violations, including violations of their rights to health and physical integrity, to be free from torture and ill-
treatment, and to equality and non-discrimination.”
“It has become common practice to subject intersex children to unnecessary surgical and other procedures for the
purpose of trying to make their appearance conform to binary sex stereotypes.”
For more information, see the Intersex Fact Sheet and the article “Sex Redefined.”25
In some contexts, discussions addressing lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and intersex (LGBTQI+) persons
will be welcomed, while in other contexts, this will not be accepted. For contexts where it is acceptable to discuss
such topics, here are some optional materials on the difference between sex, gender identity, and sexual orientation
to review.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 45 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To explore our values and attitudes about our gender identities and about being men and women.
KEY MESSAGES:
• We receive messages from family, community, and the media (social and traditional) about how we should act
as men and women and relate to each other.
• These messages influence our attitudes and beliefs about men and women, often without us even realizing it!
PREPARATION: Prepare three flip chart papers with the titles “Agree,” “Disagree,” and “Not Sure.”
Before the activity begins, tape the three posters on the wall, leaving enough space between each sign to allow a
group of participants to stand near each one.
Review the list of statements below and decide how many and which ones you will use, considering the
characteristics of the participants, the context, and the time available. You can also develop your own statements,
such as common stereotypes in your society or company.
PROCEDURE:
1. Explain to the group that you are going to do an activity that will help them to reflect on their attitudes and
beliefs about gender and about being men and women. Remind the participants that everyone has a right to
their opinion and that no response is right or wrong.
Ask the group to stand up and move to someplace where there is plenty of space near where you have hung
the three posters on the walls.
Explain that you are going to read a series of statements. After you have read a statement, the participants
should stand in front of the sign that reflects their own opinion—they can agree with the statement, disagree
with the statement, or say that they are not sure whether they agree or disagree.
List of statements:
• It is easier to be a man than a woman.
• The biology of women and men limits their ability to perform specific jobs.
• Men can’t clean the house or wash dishes.
• Men should make the final decisions in the household.
• Men take on leadership roles because they are mentally stronger and better than women at decision-making.
• Women are better leaders. They have more soft skills.
CLOSING STATEMENTS
The ideas we have about men and women (stereotypes) influence our attitudes and values and how we behave
in private and public settings, often subconsciously.
Exploring our attitudes toward men and women of different ethnicities, ages, and jobs/roles can help us make
different choices about how we behave in our families and with work colleagues.
Everyone should be treated equally as people and should have the same rights and opportunities, independent
of their sex, gender, age, ethnicity, religion, class, social status, and role in the organization.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: During the activity, ensure that women and men have equal opportunity to
share their ideas and opinions. In some settings, men may be the first to express their opinions and may
be less wary of doing so. If two men have spoken in a row, address the women directly and say, “Let’s hear
from the women.Which one you would like to share an idea, thought, or opinion?”
If all the participants agree about any of the statements, express an opinion that is different from theirs to get the
discussion going.
If some participants do not know whether they agree or disagree and do not want to stand beside any of the three
signs, ask them to say more about their reactions to the statement.
If there are marked differences between men’s and women’s degrees of agreement or disagreement, point this out
and ask why that is the case.
Use one or more of the work-related statements if you are particularly interested in discussing how gender values
express themselves in the work environment.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity is designed to be used with mixed-gender groups. For tips on adapting
it for single-gender groups, see the facilitators’ notes at the end of the activity.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To enable participants to speak out about their experiences of gender and be listened to.
• To develop a better understanding of and empathy for the experiences of people of other genders.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Gender norms shape people’s lives, molding and limiting gender identities, roles, and relations.
• Because of gendered socialization processes, men and women have unequal access to opportunities, rights,
and resources. Differences in socioeconomic status, age, race/ethnicity, and immigrant status compound
this inequity.
• Breaking with gender stereotypes and expected roles is key to achieving gender equality but can have negative
consequences for both girls/women and boys/men. Ridicule, social exclusion, threats, and violence are used
to keep women and men in their boxes.
• The roles of men and women are constantly changing. It has slowly become less difficult to break with
established gender norms, but that can still be challenging in many contexts where norms are deeply entrenched.
MATERIALS: None
PREPARATION: Read through the statements below and decide which ones are most suitable for the group you
will be working with.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: THE GENDER FISHBOWL EXERCISE
1. Divide the participants into a men’s group and a women’s group, with participants choosing the group they
identify with. (If some do not identify with either category, invite them to be observers, and feed in their
comments as the activity unfolds and after the activity).
Ask the men’s group to sit in a circle in the middle of the room and the women’s group to sit around the
outside of the circle, facing in.
2. Start a discussion with the men by asking the questions below. Choose the questions you think are more
suited to the group. If you have limited time, you can choose either the questions that are most relevant to
your group or the preselected, bolded ones. The women must observe and listen to what is being said. They
are not allowed to speak out, engage in side conversations, or laugh.
27 Adapted from The HIV-AIDS Network–Africa, “Tsima Community Mobilisation Materials,” 61–62, and MenCare, The MenCare 50:50 Project, 34–35.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Use key insights from the exercise and the key messages above to close
the activity.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Often, our opinions and perspectives about other genders are informed
by stereotypes and gender and social norms reinforced over time by many sources, such as the media or
our peers. This often makes it difficult for us to understand other genders and their needs and concerns.
By better understanding people of other genders and their needs and experiences, we can have greater empathy for
their experiences and how those experiences affect them, particularly in the workplace.
The gender fishbowl helps participants understand gender norms. However, remember that these norms may be
affected by class, culture, ethnicity, and other differences.
Make sure that you adapt the activity to suit the context and group you are working with. For example, if the
statements are not an accurate reflection of the gender roles and expectations in your country or context, then
use other statements that reflect your area more accurately.
• It is often difficult to live up to or fulfill the gender role society expects of us.
• The messages society gives us about gender can negatively affect our behavior and relationships and our
advancement and productivity in the workplace.
• Gender roles can create unequal ways of living and being in society, relationships, and workplaces.
• Our expectations of the role a man or woman should play keep people trapped “in the box,” even if they want
to move out of the box (in other words, people often cannot see the advantage to themselves in moving out of
the box).
This activity works best with a mixed-gender group of participants, but you can run it with single-gender groups by
dividing the participants into two smaller groups. Ask the first group to answer the first three or four questions from
the list of questions relevant to their gender. You might also ask a fourth question: “What do you think is the most
difficult part about being a woman/man in your country?” Refer to the opposite gender of those in the group. Then
ask the second group to answer as many questions as possible from the list relevant to the other gender (men if the
group is all women; women if the group is all men).
Depending on the participants, consider intergenerational groups, such as a younger group alone with an older group
listening, and vice versa.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity is designed to be used with mixed-gender groups. For tips on adapting
it for single-gender groups, see the facilitators’ notes at the end of the activity.
OBJECTIVES:
• To understand the role social institutions (family, workplace, school, religion, mass media, etc.) play in teaching
us how to be men or women.
• To recognize the benefits and costs of gender norms and gender socialization (beliefs, attitudes, values, and
behavior).
KEY MESSAGES:
Several cultural and social institutions play a role in teaching patriarchal gender roles:
• Family
• Schools
• Workplaces
• Religion
• The media
• Internal policing and external security (police, prisons, military)
• Traditional initiation schools/institutions
• Peers and friends
In particular, some institutions play a key role in teaching men about gender. This is because they involve
or reach a lot of men. It may also be because they are run by men, who hold positions of power, or because they
exclude women or treat men and women very differently.
Diverse institutions play different roles in maintaining gender inequality. Some institutions (such as the
family or religion) teach men that it is natural that they have more power than women. Other institutions (such
as the military and some workplaces) are dominated by men and express male power. Other institutions (schools
and the media) send messages to men and women about men’s superiority.
28 From Sonke Gender Justice Network, Sonke Change Manual, 106–111. Adapted from original activity in CANTERA, “El Significado de Ser Hombre,” with
additions and further modifications of the version included in CARE. (2013). Gender Equity and Diversity: Facilitator Manual. Module 501 Engaging Men and
Boys for Gender Equality.
MATERIALS: Flip chart paper, markers, masking tape, B5 size cards (one per participant).
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: FORMATION OF GROUPS (10 MINUTES)
1. Begin by explaining that the group will now begin personal/group reflection and analysis of their own lives and
experiences.
Divide participants into two groups of men and two groups of women, ensuring that they are as heterogeneous
as possible to have a wide variety of life experiences within each group. (If there are participants who do not
identify as either men or women, ask them to join the group they feel most comfortable in).
Give each group one of the following question guides. There will be one question guide specifically for Group 1
(men) and another for Group 2 (women), and the third guide should be provided to both the other group
of women (Group 3) and the other group of men (Group 4).
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Close the activity, reaffirming that every little effort counts, no matter how small it
may seem at the time, and that changes in the way boys, girls, young men, and young women are brought up are
important not only for them but for their future partners, families, companies, communities, and economies.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: This activity enables participants to remember people, situations, and
experiences from their childhoods that, when shared and reflected upon in a safe environment, may
provoke feelings of sadness, frustration, loss, and anger as they discover new meanings and even
remember things that have been “forgotten” or ignored. It is important to encourage participants to
express their feelings but without pushing too hard and threatening their sense of security. It is important that you be
positive and empathetic, reaffirming men and women when they share intimate, personal experiences, as this helps
create an atmosphere of acceptance of the kind of sharing that is not common in everyday social spaces, especially
between men.
Spend some time with each of the groups to clarify doubts and queries and to stimulate reflection and sharing. It can
help the groups to deepen their analyses if you share something from your own experience with them.
During the main group session, focus on issues that you feel need further unpacking and have not been brought up
by the participants. Focus on contentious issues, reproduction of stereotypes, and major similarities and differences
between the reflections within the groups. Remember, however, that most of the intimate sharing will take place
in small groups, so do not be surprised if the main group session is more of a rational analysis of experiences than
the small group work is, as it is not easy to share personal feelings in a large group. This does not mean that the
participants are not being challenged at an emotional level, and it is important to acknowledge that each individual is
embarking on a personal and unique journey. Still, try to encourage participants to share stories or to give examples in
the large group as well.
In a similar way, women are also reprimanded and punished for acting in “masculine” ways, which can lead to forms
of psychological violence like social isolation and exclusion. In more extreme circumstances, women who do not
conform to society’s patriarchal stereotypes of femininity can experience physical and sexual violence, as in the case
of the “corrective” rape of lesbians. In work settings, women bosses are often ridiculed, not taken seriously, and given
offensive nicknames.
When forming groups to discuss the influence of other men and women and religion/cultural traditions, ask group
1 to focus on relatives of their own gender and group 2 to focus on relatives of the other gender. Groups 3 and 4
can both discuss the influence of family, the educational system, and media; alternatively, group 3 can focus on family
members and group 4 on school, with both groups also reflecting on the role of the media.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity is designed to be used mostly with groups of men. For tips on
adapting it for mixed-gender groups, see the facilitators’ notes at the end of the activity or use Activity 3.3: Man
Box, Woman Box, Human Box.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To recognize the challenges men face in trying to fulfill societal expectations about gender roles.
• To understand the costs of rigid forms of masculinity and that it is possible to change.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Boys and men receive many harmful, sometimes contradictory messages on what it means to “be a man.”
• If boys and men do not conform to these messages of masculinity, that does not mean they are “less than”
or not good enough.
• Boys and men can and should work to redefine more positive and more inclusive forms of masculinity.
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
PROCEDURE:
MAIN GROUP DIALOGUE
1. Ask the group the following questions:
a. What are some of the messages a boy is given when he is told to “act like a man”?
Make sure they understand that they are discussing external messages that boys and men receive from
others in their community/society.
b. What does society value about men and boys? What defines a “successful” man?
(Probing questions:What kind of career should they have? What should their family look like? What about their
financial situation?)
c. In a workplace environment, what messages do your colleagues and supervisor send to men about the “right”
way to behave or the functions they should have? Are there any spoken or unspoken rules for men to follow?
Explain to participants that this is not a list of things they think are true but the messages that men are
given about what they must do to act like a man in the workplace.
2. Write the responses on the flip chart as they are spoken. Keep repeating the phrase “act like a man” with
different inflections in your voice to encourage participants to think of more words.
3. Discuss where these messages come from (“Who is the messenger?”).
“Do they come from your father? Your teacher? Other family members? Images on television? Your peers and friends?
29 From Equimundo, Manhood 2.0, adapted from Men’s Resources International, “Change-Makers Training Facilitator Handbook.”
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Although being outside of the box will lead to some of the positive outcomes
discussed, it will not happen all at once.
Staying in the box can be harmful, and we should continue to think of ways to break out of this box to be truer
to ourselves.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Adapting the activity to focus simultaneously on the Man Box
and the Woman Box:
• This activity, as it stands, can be used with a mixed-gender group or an all-men group when there is
particular interest in understanding that masculinity is a gendered social construction.
• The activity can be easily adapted, however, to simultaneously draw out characteristics of the “Woman Box.”
You can do this by splitting the participants into one group of men and another of women. Facilitated by a woman,
the women’s group answers the questions in relation to the messages girls and women receive from culture/
society about being women.
• When both groups have finished, facilitate a large-group session for both groups to share feedback and analyze
the major similarities and differences between the Man Box and the Woman Box.
• Depending on the group and time available, you can probe how race/ethnicity or economic background plays a
role in the Man Box.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity is designed to be used with mixed-gender groups. If you adapt
Activity 3.2: Unpacking the Man Box for mixed-gender groups, there is no need to use this activity.
OBJECTIVES:
• Understand the concept of the “Human Box.”
• Recognize the challenges men and women face in trying to fulfill societal expectations about gender roles,
particularly in the workplace.
• Understand the costs of rigid forms of masculinity and femininity in the workplace and that it is possible to
change.
KEY MESSAGES:
• A person, regardless of their gender or sex, can have any combination of characteristics inside the Human
Box. Such decisions should be based on their personal choices as individuals and human beings, not forced
upon them based on their gender.
• When we aspire to the ideals of the Human Box, we are changing the question from “How should a man/
woman act?” to “How would a human being act?”
• Similarly, we can also change the discourse from “What are the things that a mother/father should do?” to
“What are the things that a parent should do?”
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
PROCEDURE:
1. Divide the participants into two groups: men in one group and women in the other group.
2. Give each group a piece of flip chart paper, a marker, and the following instructions. Give them 20 minutes to
complete the following activity.
a. Men’s group: Ask a group member to draw a big square on the flip chart for the group. The box should
be almost as big as the paper on the flip chart, but make sure there is room to write items outside the
square. Ask the group to brainstorm a list of what society expects from a person when they tell them to
“act like a man.” This can include messages from families, workplaces, or communities at large. Place this
list inside the square or “box” on the flip chart paper.
Ask the group to place characteristics that their societies label as “not acting like a man” on the flip chart
paper outside the box.
When the groups have finished filling in their boxes and the area around their boxes, ask the participants
to take two or three extra minutes and circle the items on the flip chart that directly relate to men’s roles
in the workplace.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Although stepping outside of a gender box can have positive outcomes, these will
not happen all at once, and being outside that box will not always be easy.
However, staying in the Man Box or Woman Box can be harmful, and we should continue to think of ways to
break out of these boxes to be truer to ourselves.
If this session is being held with only men, follow the activity as instructed, having one group of men be
the “men’s group,” and the other group of men be the “women’s group.” This adaptation can be especially
impactful for men who have to think from a woman’s perspective.
Depending on the group and time available, you can probe how race/ethnicity, age, migration status, or economic
background play a role in the Man Box.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To encourage participants to reflect on the influences their fathers and mothers (or other female
and male primary caregivers or father or mother figures) had on their lives growing up, including how to use the
positive influences and how to avoid the negative aspects so they do not continue those traits.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Who we are today was shaped by our experiences growing up, but those experiences do not have to
determine who we will become in the future.
• Reflecting on our own past enables us to make positive choices for the future by replacing negative attitudes
and behaviors with positive ones.
MATERIALS: None
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching, methodology, and timing.
Compile a list of available counseling service providers within the company and externally that you can refer
participants to, should they need them following this or any of the other sessions.
PROCEDURE:
INTRODUCTION
1. Explain to the group that this activity will let them reflect on the influence that their mothers and fathers (or
male/female primary caregivers, father/mother figures) had on them when they were growing up. Tell them
that they will think about how they can learn from the positive aspects of their parents or primary caregivers
in raising their own children and how to avoid the negative aspects so that they do not continue those traits.
32 Adapted from ManCare, Bandebereho Facilitator’s Manual, 51–53 (previously from the activity “My Father’s Impact” from REDMAS, Equimundo, and
EME, “Program P Manual.”
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Highlight the idea that both men and women can take on roles in the workplace
related to caring for others (emotionally and materially) and fostering a safe and healthy work environment.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: This activity can have a significant emotional impact on participants
and facilitators because participants may recall violent experiences or other traumatic life events,
such as abandonment. Therefore, it is important to listen respectfully to the participants, without
judging or pressuring them.
If necessary, share the list you compiled before the activity of available emotional support resources within the
company and externally33 with participants who have demonstrated emotional distress. Alternatively, hand out
the list at the end of the session to all the participants.
NOTES:
33 Engendering Industries partner Eko Electricity Distribution Company (EKEDC) has a pool of lay counselors trained; Engendering Industries partner
Liberia Electricity Corporation has partnered with Action Aid to assist with sexual harassment reporting and counseling.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender groups or single-gender groups.
TIME: 40 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To provide an opportunity for the group to deepen their understanding of culture, tradition, and religion
and how they relate to one another and to gender concepts.
• Explore how culture, tradition, and religion impact the workplace.
KEY MESSAGES: Culture, tradition, and religion, while interrelated, are actually different things.
PREPARATION: Ensure you have all the materials needed for the activity.
PROCEDURE:
1. Lead participants to brainstorm words they associate first with “culture,” then with “tradition,” and finally
with “religion.”
Record these words on three separate flip charts, being careful to include all contributions. Repetition is not
a problem; simply add a tick mark next to the phrases that are repeated.
After a substantial list of words has been created, it is time for the group to agree on working definitions for
these three words. There is no right or wrong answer here; your job as facilitator is simply to bring out what
they already know. To help the group do this, divide them into smaller groups and tell them they have ten
minutes to come up with the definitions.
Once ten minutes have passed, ask each group to write their definitions on flip-chart paper or the whiteboard.
Ask each group to read their definitions aloud and post them on the wall.
Guide the discussion to reflect on how culture and tradition (separately and together) influence ideas around
gender stereotypes, roles and norms, and gender inequalities. Ask for ideas on how to challenge harmful
notions and practices that arise from our culture(s) and/or tradition(s).
a. How do some of the traditions and cultural practices you mentioned affect people who identify as men
and women differently?
b. How do these traditions and practices constitute forms of violence against women, girls, boys, and men?
How can we transform these traditions and cultural practices to break the cycle of violence?
c. Are there examples of cultural norms and traditions that celebrate gender equality? What about racial/
ethnic equality?
d. We often talk about how religion creates justifications for inequalities and violence. What are some ways
that religion can actually uphold the values of peace and equality across genders?
2. Leave these definitions up around the room for the rest of the training session.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: The following definitions can assist you in guiding the participants as they
develop their definitions.
Culture:34
The set of shared attitudes, values, goals, and practices that characterize an institution, organization, or group.
Culture is not static but is externally affected and capable of evolving over time through contact between societies/
groups that may produce or limit change. Traditions may be unique to particular cultures or may be shared across
various cultural groups.
Tradition:
Beliefs or customs that are taught by one generation to the next, often orally. Traditions are viewed as ancient,
unchangeable, and deeply important, though they may sometimes be much less “natural” than is presumed. Most
traditions evolved for one reason or another, often to highlight or enhance the importance of a certain political,
economic, or religious institution.
Religion:
A set of beliefs concerning the cause, nature, and purpose of the universe, especially when considered as the
creation of a superhuman agency (God) or agencies (gods), usually involving devotional and ritual observances and
often containing a moral code governing the conduct of human affairs. It is a specific, fundamental set of beliefs and
practices generally agreed upon by a number of persons or institutions.
Social Norms:
Deeply ingrained behavior patterns that are typical of specific groups. Such behaviors are learned from parents,
teachers, peers, and many others whose values, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors are influenced by the context of
their own lives. Some norms are healthy, and some are not. Some contribute to the betterment of individuals,
families, and communities; others contribute to oppression, ill health, and suffering.
NOTES:
34 From a social-anthropological viewpoint, there are around 100 different definitions for “culture.” This one is used for purposes of this training, but
others can be used too.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups. In single-
gender groups, some participants can play the role of the “other gender.” This activity can be used as an initial
icebreaker/introduction to the theme before carrying out Activity 4.2 or as a stand-alone activity.
OBJECTIVES: To reflect on how gender roles influence the distribution of care work, including caring for children
and household tasks, and to encourage a more equitable distribution of housework between men and women.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Women and men are raised to perform different roles within care work, with women usually bearing a
significant proportion of the care work (including childcare and domestic work). These roles and norms a
re often reflected in the workplace as well.
• Women and men are capable of sharing care work—the key is discussing and communicating a fair distribution
of tasks that is right for each family.
MATERIALS: None
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
PROCEDURE:
1. Explain to the participants that this activity will help them to reflect on how gender roles influence the
distribution of care work within the household.
35 From ManCare, Bandebereho Facilitator’s Manual, 93–96, adapted from the activity “Domestic Tasks: We only notice when nobody does them!” in Equimundo,
“Program H Manual.”
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Tell the participants that gender roles and the distribution of work in families
are often reproduced in workplace settings.
Facilitate a discussion on why that occurs and how it can be changed.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: While the volunteers are preparing the role-play, you can ask the other
participants to form small groups of two or three and talk about the work that they generally carry out
within the home on a regular basis.
Although this is a fun activity, it is important to do an in-depth debrief using the questions provided.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity is designed to be used with mixed-gender groups. For tips on adapting
it for single-gender groups, see Facilitators’ Notes at the end of the activity. This activity can be done in addition to
or in lieu of Activity 4.1.
OBJECTIVES: To comprehend the social value placed upon the different types of work associated with being
men and women and how the gendered division of work leads to unequal access to opportunities and rights for
women and men.
KEY MESSAGES:
Women and men are often assigned different roles in society, which means that
• Women and men do different things during the day.
• Women usually work longer hours.
• Men usually have more leisure time.
• Women have more varied tasks, sometimes doing more than one thing at a time.
• A woman’s perceived role is often that of caregiver and mother, and a man’s perceived role is often that
of provider (breadwinner), protector, and authority/head of the household.
Women’s roles carry a lower status—and are often unpaid:
• Women’s work in the house is usually not paid and is not seen to be work.
• When women work outside the house, it is generally an extension of the work they do in the house.
This workis usually paid less than men’s work. Even when women work outside the home, they also do
a substantial amount of household work as well.
• Men’s work is usually outside the home, is usually paid, and is seen to be work.
• More of women’s work is unpaid or underpaid compared to men’s work.
Gender roles are not only different but also unequal:
• Men’s roles (breadwinner, authority figure, protector) carry a higher status and give men more power, money,
and privilege in society.
Productive and reproductive work are associated with different genders and have different values:
• “Men’s” work is socially and economically valued and is known as “productive work,” as it produces goods
and wealth.
• “Women’s” work is socially and economically undervalued and is known as “reproductive work,” as it focuses
on the biological, cultural, and social reproduction of humanity.
• Many women carry out both types of work on a daily basis. Even when they are in leadership positions,
women are more likely than men to also be responsible for carrying out and/or organizing care work.
36 From Sonke Gender Justice Network, Sonke Change Manual, 66–71. Multiple versions of this activity have appeared in different manuals over the years, including
Sonke’s OMC manual, Working with Men and Boys to Reduce the Spread and Impact of HIV and AIDS,” Activity 2.6. Other versions were also included in Sonke’s
“Facilitator’s Guide to Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights (2013), 23. The Sonke Change Manual is adapted from CANTERA, El Significado, and includes
additions and further modifications of the version included in CARE. (2013). Gender Equity and Diversity: Facilitator Manual. Module 501 Engaging Men
and Boys for Gender Equality.
MATERIALS: B5 size cards of two different colors (one of each color for each participant), Participant
Handout 2: The 24-Hour Day
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
Make one copy of Participant Handout 2 per participant, corresponding to each participant’s gender.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: INDIVIDUAL EXERCISE (15 MINUTES)
1. Give each participant a copy of the version of Participant Handout 2: The 24-Hour Day that corresponds
with their gender (there is one sheet for men and one for women).
2. Go through Participant Handout 2 with the participants, explaining to them that it is a tool to identify the
different types of work that men and women do on a daily basis and the value that society gives to those
types of work.
3. Some of the participants might live alone. If this is the case, invite them to remember what things were like
when they were in a relationship or when they lived with family.
4. Invite each participant to think about the activities that they carry out on a typical day, starting at 1:00 a.m.
Then, ask participants to write them down next to the corresponding times. Participants may want to group
blocks of time together (for example, the hours that they sleep). Tell them to write “yes” or “no” next to an
activity to indicate whether it is paid or not.
5. When they have finished, invite them to do the same for the people of another gender in their household,
carefully thinking through all of the activities those people carry out in a typical day within the home, outside
the home, and in the community. Emphasize that this should include their wife/husband/partner, if they have
one, their mother/father, grandmother/grandfather, and sister/brother. Be sensitive to participants in the
group who might be single, in same-sex relationships, or nonbinary, and instruct them to make changes in the
headings as necessary. Tell them to write “yes” or “no” next to each activity, depending on whether it is paid
or not.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Carry out a brief synthesis of the main issues raised throughout the activity,
focusing on the relationship between a person’s gender, the types of work they carry out, the social value placed
on that work, and their access to other opportunities and rights in society.
Use the key messages at the start of this activity to summarize and close the activity.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES:
This activity is a good way to understand the idea of gender roles and the fact that women and men are
expected to play different roles in the family, community, and workplace because of society’s ideas about
the differences between men and women. But remember that these gender roles may also be affected by differences
based on class, ethnicity, and other characteristics.
Bear in mind that many men do take part in some domestic work, usually as a way of helping out occasionally when
there is a specific need, but rarely as an expression of shared responsibility.
Be aware that this exercise might make some men feel a sense of guilt or frustration when they so graphically see
Remember also that when a man decides to change the way he relates to domestic work, this affects the women
who have been carrying it out for years! Men should be sensitive when they decide to take part in domestic work
and ensure that changes that they instigate do not make women feel threatened, undervalued, or displaced.
This can happen often, especially if the women involved have had no access to gender training. Men should talk
about and negotiate changes with the women involved beforehand, and those changes should be subject to the
women’s approval.
This activity can be carried out with groups of all men. To do so, you may need to be proactive in enabling some
of the men to acknowledge and value the work carried out by women. In Part 4: Proposals for Change, you can
eliminate the instructions for women’s groups and focus only on men’s commitments to “care work that I will
carry out on a regular basis” and “Things I will do to value the work that women carry out in my home.”
NOTES:
Man: Women:
Total paid hours (A): Total paid hours (A):
Total unpaid hours (B): Total unpaid hours (B):
Total hours of labor (A+B): Total hours of labor (A+B):
Women: Men:
Total paid hours (A): Total paid hours (A):
Total unpaid hours (B): Total unpaid hours (B):
Total hours of labor (A+B): Total hours of labor (A+B):
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 90 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To understand what power is and the different types of power.
• To be able to describe what we have learned from our own experiences of power and powerlessness
KEY MESSAGES:
Feeling powerful feels like being
• In control
• Knowledgeable
• Brave
• Big
• Potent
• Happy
Feeling powerless feels like being
• Small
• Unwanted
• Fearful
• Unconfident
• Incompetent
• Downtrodden
MATERIALS: Pieces of blank paper, markers, tape, Participant Handout 3: Different Types of Power (located
after Activity 5.2), Guidelines for Group Discussion (below)
PREPARATION: Photocopies of Participant Handout 3: Different Types of Power and Guidelines for Group
Discussion.
37 From Sonke Gender Justice Network, Sonke Change Manual, 50. This was originally taken from Masibamisane SANDF, EngenderHealth, PPASA, and Women’s
Health Project, “HIV/AIDS and Gender Equity Training Project” and adapted for inclusion in the OIT manual (Activity E1.1, 119). This version has been further
adapted to include greater participation.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: In this activity, we explored personal reflections about experiences related
to power and powerlessness.
Power can be used negatively to create power over someone else, which can bring about feelings of
powerlessness in that other person. Power can also be wielded positively, such as in the case of “power
with.” In this use, power is used collectively to create shared feelings of power.
Gender often plays a role in the way that power relations play out.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: It is important to talk about the difference between feeling powerful as
individuals and the economic, political, and social power that comes with belonging to more powerful
groups in society. For example, some individual women may feel powerful in their own lives, but as a
group, women lack economic, political, and social power. If any participants talk about knowing many powerful
women, be sure to make this point.
Acknowledge, too, that men can feel powerless on an individual basis or in relation to other social conditions like
unemployment, their skin color, or class, but that as a gender, men belong to a group that has power over women
in all spheres of life.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
OBJECTIVES: Understand how gender, race, age, migration status, ethnicity, and other factors influence how
much power people have over others in society and the workplace and how power can be used to restrict some
people’s progress in life and professionally.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Power has many different faces and meanings.
• We have many aspects to our identities (such as our gender or ethnicity); some of these identities can give
us more power or privilege in the workplace than others, depending on the situation.
• It is important to find ways to break out of these “power over” systems and offer support to others, in
particular in reference to gender inequalities.
MATERIALS:
• A set of character cards (see “Preparation”)
• Box, bag, or hat
• A room or open space large enough for participants to do the Power Walk
• Participant Handout 3: Different Types Of Power
PREPARATION: Make one copy per participant of Participant Handout 3: Different Types Of Power.
Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
The following are characters to be used in the Power Walk; write one character description on each card. These
characters have been chosen to show participants the effects of a range of situations in which people have power
over others, including patriarchy (based on gender), economic exploitation (linked to class), racism, xenophobia
(hatred of foreigners), religious discrimination, and discrimination based on mental or physical disability. Adapt this
set of characters to reflect the realities of oppressive “power over” systems in your context.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: POWER WALK
1. Introduce the activity by explaining to participants that this activity, called the “Power Walk,” will look at how
gender, age, ethnicity, and other factors influence how much power people have in a work setting and how
power can be used to restrict some people’s progress.
2. Put all the character cards in a box, bag, or hat for participants to select.
3. Ask the participants to stand in a row. Have each pick one card from the box, bag, or hat.
4. Ask each participant to read aloud the role they have picked. Explain that you want them to take on the
characters that have been written on the cards.
5. Ask the participants to close their eyes and think about what it would be like to be the character they have
been given. What would that character’s day look like? After a minute, ask them to open their eyes.
6. Tell them that you will read a series of statements. For each statement, you would like them to consider
whether that statement applies to their character. If it does, they should move forward one step. If it does
not, they should stay where they are.
Remind participants to speak up and ask for help from the rest of the group if they are unsure how a
particular statement applies to their character.
7. Read the following statements one at a time and ask participants to silently move forward one step if the
statement applies to them. You do not have to go through all of the statements, just as many as you can.
(Start from the top and move down until you reach the end.)
• When at work, I don’t have to worry about domestic issues.
• I have had (or will have opportunities) to further my education.
• I can easily find the time to go out with my friends when I want to.
• My home situation never has a negative effect on my work performance.
• I earn enough money to make a good life for myself and my children.
• I am treated better by my employer because of my gender.
• It is easy for me to get a loan to start a business if I should need one.
• If I have a health problem, I know I’ll have the support of my supervisor to take the time I need.
• If I were to be harassed at work, it would be easy for me to report it.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: In this activity, we looked at the different ways people have power over others.
Many people can be impacted in multiple ways by “power over” systems. For example, the effects of racism,
sexism, and poverty may impact a young, unemployed black woman. Most people have some experiences of
privilege in their lives and some experiences of oppression.
Men are privileged by patriarchy—a system in which men on the whole have power over women. But there are
limits to these privileges. For example, the privilege of the white male congressman is far greater than that of the
male veteran with physical disabilities.
As we talked about with the Man Box, it is important to find ways to break out of these “power over” systems
and support others who are trying to do the same.
Hand out Participant Handout 3: Different Types of Power so participants can read more about different types of
power at home. (Note: if you have carried out Activity 5.1: Exploring the Meaning of Power, you might already
have given this information to the participants.)
Remind participants that they can choose to step out of the activity at any point. When you ask participants to hand
in their character cards at the end, encourage them to remind themselves that they are now back in the group and
are no longer “in character.”
NOTES:
Power exists in relation to other people: Many times, we think of our power in comparison to
someone else. We can have or not have power, or have less or more power, in relation to somebody
else or a group.
Power also exists within us: We also have internal power that influences what we can and cannot do. As
we become more aware of and nurture our inner potential, we become empowered and our relationships
with others change (see “Power Within” below).
Power is not fixed: It is not something we have all the time. We are constantly moving in and out of
situations and relationships where we have more or less power.
Positive and negative feelings: We often feel positive and in control when we are feeling powerful and
have negative feelings when we are feeling less powerful. This affects our ability to influence and take action
in a situation.
There are different types of power that can be used in different ways:
POWER OVER: Control over somebody or a situation in a negative way, usually associated with
repression, force, corruption, discrimination, and abuse. Wielding this kind of power means taking it from
somebody else and then using it to dominate and prevent others from taking it—a win-lose situation.
POWER WITH: Power on the basis of collective strength and/or numbers—having power with people
or groups, finding common ground,, and building a common goal to benefit all those in the relationship. This
power multiplies individual talents and knowledge and is based on support, solidarity, and collaboration.
POWER TO: The ability to shape and influence one’s life. It means having the ideas, knowledge, skills,
money, and ability to convince yourself and others to do something. With lots of people who have this
kind of power, we create “power with.”
POWER WITHIN: A kind of power related to a person’s feeling of self-worth and self-knowledge. It is
related to that person’s ability to imagine a better life for themselves and to have hope and the sense that
they can change the world—the feeling that they have rights as a human being. It involves having a sense of
self-confidence and a feeling that they have value because they exist.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
OBJECTIVES:
• To enable participants to describe what they have learned from their own experiences of power and
powerlessness.
• To identify the different groups that have power and the groups that are targeted for unfair treatment and
explore the reasons for the differences.
KEY MESSAGES:
People often blame the less powerful for their lack of power.
In other words, they blame the victims of oppression rather than the oppressors, such as by saying that it is women
who are mainly responsible for oppressing other women.
• More powerful groups control more resources than less powerful groups. People who control resources have
greater power in society than those who do not. These resources include:
• Economic resources (work, credit, money and property, social security, health insurance, housing, land, social
capital, networks)
• Political influence (positions of leadership, influence over decision-making, influence over opinions of others)
• Education (formal/informal education)
• Time (hours available to use for a person’s own advancement, relaxation, or networking, flexible paid hours)
• Internal resources (self-esteem, self-confidence, mental and physical recovery, personal target setting)
More powerful groups stay in control because of ideas about their superiority. For instance, in South Africa, the
systems of apartheid enabled White people to feel and act superior and enacted political, social, economic,
physical, and psychological violence against Black people. Naturalized citizens feel powerful over foreigners or
refugees. In the same way, men maintain their power over women because of patriarchy (a social system based
on the idea of male superiority). Both women and men maintain this system.
In many contexts, more powerful groups can use multiple forms of violence or social and emotional manipulation
to maintain control. Violence against women, actual or threatened, is sometimes about loss of control by men but
is more of a tactic used to maintain men’s power over women.
In workplace settings, power dynamics are invariably linked to hierarchical structures. For example, executive
management teams and boards have power over who is allowed to participate, access to resources and
opportunities, and how decisions are made and by whom. Similarly, sexual or other harassment and discrimination
in the workplace can take place with impunity when power dynamics of seniority/subordination influence
subordinates’ ability to speak up and report, exacerbated by the fear of reprisals, stigma, and negative personal
and professional consequences.
MATERIALS: Flip chart paper, markers, and case studies (one for each group—attached to this activity).
39 From Sonke Gender Justice Network, Sonke Change Manual, 72; originally from Masibamisane SANDF et al., “HIV/AIDS and Gender Equity Training Project,”
adapted and included in OIT Manual, Activity E1.2, 121.
PROCEDURE:
1. Explain that this activity looks at which groups have more power than others and the effects of these power
inequalities.
2. Draw a line down the middle of a piece of flip chart paper. At the top of the left-hand column, write “More
Powerful Groups” and at the top of the right-hand column, write “Targeted—Less Powerful Groups.”
3. Ask participants to brainstorm groups from their own society or communities and fit these into the power
chart categories. Help them come up with examples of these two groups by suggesting categories that may
have power and a target group. Consider sex, race, age, religion, financial status, and sexual orientation.
A power chart might look something like the example below. Feel free to adapt the manual for your own
purposes by adding other power dimensions that are applicable or often experienced within the context
of your company.
4. Explain to participants that the group will be exploring this concept of power further by examining a few case
studies and responding to questions about them.
5. Divide participants into four small groups. Hand out a case study and corresponding questions to each group.
6. Give the small groups 15 minutes to prepare responses and then reconvene everyone to talk about each case
study in turn.
7. Lead a discussion on different aspects of power, how themes overlap between the different case studies,
where the differences lie, and why that is.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Use the key messages above to summarize the activity.
Print out the case studies on A4 paper (one per A4 sheet) and prepare enough copies for the number
of participants you will have in the workshop.
If necessary, change the names and circumstances of the characters in the case studies to fit your organization’s
and participants’ context.
As a facilitator, it is important that you let people have their reactions but also that you challenge any “blame
the victim” mentality. Point out that it is common for some individuals within the oppressed groups to deal with
their frustrations of being oppressed by reinforcing the views of the oppressor group, such as in situations where
women do not have the resources and power to challenge the status quo.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
OBJECTIVES: To explore the use of power as an instrument of dominance and control, identifying
discriminatory attitudes and practices we have experienced in our own lives (family, work, and community).
KEY MESSAGES:
It is possible to discriminate and be discriminated against based on a wide variety of different personal, cultural,
and social conditions and circumstances: gender, age, race/ethnicity, skin color, sexuality, social class, economic
status, education, professional role, physical and mental attributes, hair texture and style, and physical appearance.
Some forms of discrimination may seem petty, but they can be damaging and hurtful and can have long-lasting
effects. Others can be of a graver, more serious nature, especially if they are related to central aspects of our
sense of identity and worth.
Some discrimination can be eliminated by changes in our circumstances, brought about by us, by others, or by
specific events. For example, if someone is discriminated against for being poor and they find a well-paying job,
they may find that they are no longer discriminated against for that reason. If a boy is ridiculed and laughed at for
being skinny and weak but grows up to develop a well-defined body, that particular cause of discrimination
will cease to exist.
Other experiences of discrimination are intrinsically linked to aspects of our identities, such as our gender, race/
ethnicity, skin color or complexion, sexual orientation, and class. These are generally linked to various structures
and standards that the world upholds, including perceptions of beauty, normality, and intellectual superiority. It is
necessary to challenge and change harmful stereotypes, attitudes, behaviors, and social norms that lead to power
abuse and discrimination to prevent and eradicate discrimination.
Discriminatory attitudes and practices can also become institutionalized and even embedded in laws that establish
unequal rights and opportunities for different groups of people. Historically, laws created by and for men have
discriminated against women and infringed upon their rights and opportunities, which is why women have had to
struggle for equality in society.
MATERIALS: None
PREPARATION: Read the list of possible reasons for discrimination and choose the ones most suitable to your
own context, adding others as necessary and appropriate.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: INTRODUCING DISCRIMINATION AND ITS TACTICS
1. Tell the group that we will be talking about discrimination in this activity. Ask the group for a definition of
discrimination.
Discrimination: Treating a person or group of people in an unfair way based on a particular characteristic,
such as race, gender, disability, age, or sexual orientation. (Source: MenCare-50-50-South-Africa-Manual)
40 From Sonke Gender Justice Network, Sonke Change Manual, 122-126; Taken from CANTERA, “El Significado.”
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Carry out a synthesis of the exercise, focusing on the “Key Messages” included
at the beginning of this exercise.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: It is important to give participants the time they need to process and
express their feelings about the discrimination they have experienced.
When you begin Part 3, do not be surprised if there is an initial silence. This does not mean that no one wants to
share but rather suggests that people are still processing their feelings and ideas. If, after a few minutes, no one wants
to go first, feel free to start yourself, sharing an experience from your own life, how you felt about it, and how it
affected your personal development. You will find that, one by one, others will begin to share.
Make eye contact with the participants seated in the circle and smile, as this can encourage them to begin to share.
If you see that someone is about to say something but is still hesitant, make a gesture with your hand and say their
name, offering them the chance to speak out. Speak gently but firmly.
Some participants may become emotional and perhaps start to cry if the discrimination they remember has had
severe effects on their life. Allow them to do so, asking someone from the group to bring a glass of water or offering
a reassuring gesture. When the person has finished sharing and expressing their feelings, use the opportunity to
reflect upon the prohibition that men experience against expressing emotions and crying (this may also be applicable
You may add other motives for discrimination to this list (or remove some) depending on the characteristics of the
group you will be working with to make it more appropriate to their reality.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To define how we belong to various social identity groups.
• To define positions of privilege and disadvantage within each social identity group.
• To discover how close or distant we are to the dominant identities of our current society.
• To discuss the implications of social identity for our day-to-day experiences.
KEY MESSAGES: The Power Flower is a visual representation of our social identities and our proximity to the
social identities that hold power and privilege in our society.
Key concepts:
• “Big 8” social identities
• Dominant identities, non-dominant identities
• Privilege and disadvantage
PREPARATION: Print the Power Flower template (attached to this activity) or use plain A4 size paper to draw on.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: EXPLAIN THE POWER FLOWER TEMPLATE AND GUIDE PARTICIPANTS THROUGH
THE EXERCISE.
1. Give a copy of the Power Flower template below to each participant. If you cannot make copies, draw the
template on a piece of flip chart paper and provide A4 sheets of white paper for participants to copy and
draw their own Power Flower templates.
2. Explain the Flower Power template to the participants and guide them through the exercise:
a. The center petal is you!
b. The eight petals around the center circle are your inner ring. In each petal, write how you identify with
each of the “Big 8” social identities on the right of the template (for example, “Black” in the race petal or
“straight” in the sexual orientation petal).
c. In each of the eight outer ring petals, write what you consider to be the dominant group for each social
identity. For example, for race, one might write “White.” If you are unsure of what the dominant group is,
talk to those around you.
d. Choose one color that is associated with dominant identity groups and one other color. Invite participants
to color in the petals of dominant identities—in both the inner and outer ring—with the first color. Then
ask them to color in the petals of nondominant identities with the other color.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Close the activity by highlighting the following definition of privilege: “… the
unearned access to resources that are only readily available to some people because of their social group
membership; an advantage, or immunity granted to or enjoyed by one societal group above and beyond the
common advantage of all other groups. Privilege is often invisible to those who have it.”42 Resources may be
economic, social, educational, or intellectual.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Part 2 can be carried out initially in pairs if time allows.
If necessary, modify the social identities to fit your own cultural context. In some settings, for example, it
may be relevant to include “caste;” in other settings, if all participants are of the same nationality, you may not feel it
is important to include that identity.
Some participants may resist the idea that they belong to a privileged group, especially if they experience
powerlessness or discrimination from others due to other aspects of their identity.
Clarify that being part of a privileged group does not mean that all members of that group experience the same
benefits, nor that all members abuse their power and privilege to gain an advantage over others.
It is not always easy, however, for members of a privileged group to acknowledge their privilege and harder still
to critically challenge the abusive behavior of others in that privileged group.
42 Teaching for Diversity and Social Justice, 1997, as cited in Ontario Tech University, 2018.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 90 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To identify dynamics of power within relationships with partners, family members, coworkers,
and/or friends and articulate proposals to change these power relations.
KEY MESSAGES:
• All relationships are influenced by power, whether or not that power is directly visible.
• By acknowledging the power that we have and that others have over us, we can improve communication and
decision-making and can avoid abusing power in ways that are harmful to others and to ourselves.
PROCEDURE:
1. Give each participant a copy of the power map. Ask them to think about four to eight people who they
have a close relationship with (such as their partner, family members, and people at school, at work, in the
community, or at a place of worship) and to write their names in the circles around the center circle with
“ME” written in it. They may focus on fewer relationships if they wish, especially if there is a particular one
that they perceive to be problematic.
2. Encourage participants to include two or more colleagues with whom they have a working relationship—as
part of a team, as a boss or manager, and/or in a junior capacity. They will not be asked to reveal those
coworkers’ names.
3. For each of these individuals, ask the participants to write a word or phrase on the line that points from “ME”
to that person. This word or phrase should describe the type of power that the participant exercises over that
person and the methods they use to wield that power.
4. Invite them to do the same on the line that points from each person to “ME,” using a word or phrase that best
describes the type of power that that person has over the participant and how they exercise that power.
5. Tell the participants to take time to reflect and discover the most accurate descriptions possible.
6. Have each person partner with another participant. Invite them to share elements of their power maps and
what they feel they need to do to change the aspects of those power relations that are damaging to them
and others.
7. In the main group, have participants share their thoughts on power and the commitments they made.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Close the activity by reaffirming the key messages above.
43 From Engaging Men and Boys GED 501 Manual CARE, 74–76; This activity was originally developed in the 1990s by CANTERA, Nicaragua, as a tool for enabling
men to identify issues of power, control and violence in their relationships and take measures to change.
You may want to go around the room to each group to get an idea of the kind of power relations they are
focusing on, and if necessary, challenge them to be more specific and concrete in the situations they are recalling
and describing.
It is likely that many of the men will detect major problems related to the use of power in the family.
Remind participants of the need to enter into dialogue with those who will be most directly affected by proposed
changes and the need to develop new styles of interpersonal communication. Often, when men try to implement
change, they do so from a position of power and impose changes that can indirectly affect others in a negative way,
even when the intention is just the opposite.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To identify different types of violence and to discuss the types of violence that occur most commonly in families
and partner relationships.
• To guide participants in understanding GBV.
• To demonstrate the relationship between GBV, power, and control.
KEY MESSAGES:45
• At its most basic level, violence is a way to control or exert power over another person. People often think
about violence only as physical aggression, but there are other forms of violence as well.
• GBV is an abuse of human rights that affects every culture and age group.
• The roots of GBV are deeply entrenched in social norms that define masculinity and femininity and that
reinforce unequal power structures that privilege masculinity over femininity.
• Evidence demonstrates that GBV can be prevented, but doing so requires systemic and coordinated efforts.
• Initiatives to prevent and respond to GBV should put the best interest, dignity, experience, and needs of the
person experiencing violence at the center of the process—from designing the initial program to investigating
and responding to alleged incidents, with appropriate accountability for perpetrators of abuse. This is known
as a survivor-centered approach.
MATERIALS: Flip chart paper, markers, masking tape, Participant Handout 4: Gender-Based Violence
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
Make one photocopy per participant of Participant Handout 4: Gender-Based Violence.
PROCEDURE:
Trigger Warning: Discussing violence may be challenging for some. Give participants appropriate warnings
before each activity to allow them to decide if they would rather not take part in the activity and/or leave the
training space at any time they need to.
44 This activity combines content from ManCare, Bandebereho Facilitator’s Manual, 55–57, and CARE Rwanda, Indashyikirwa Rwanda, 52–56.
45 These key messages are from USAID, “Collective Action.” https://makingcents.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/Glossary_508c.pdf
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Use the key messages to close the activity. Highlight the importance of a
survivor-centered approach that always respects the needs and decisions of the person experiencing violence.
If participants are reluctant to discuss the questions in the main group, use small groups, especially for more
intimate and challenging questions.
GBV is part of an ongoing system in which we socialize men and women differently and value women less than
men. This is a very important point that is often overlooked. It is important that people really understand what
GBV is.
It is common for participants to focus only on extreme forms of violence. Probe as needed to help participants
identify the other common forms of violence that affect people’s day-to-day lives.
NOTES:
TYPES OF GBV
1. Physical Violence: Use of physical force, such as hitting, slapping, kicking, burning, or pushing.
2. Emotional or Psychological Violence: Often the most difficult form of violence to identify. It may
include humiliating, threatening, insulting, pressuring, and expressing jealousy or possessiveness, such as
controlling decisions and activities. It can also include restricting someone’s movements. This form of
violence can be verbal or nonverbal.
3. Sexual Violence: Any unwanted sexual comments, sexual acts, or attempted sexual acts using
force or coercion or the threat of force or coercion. This can include situations in which a person is
incapable of giving genuine consent. Sexual violence/abuse can be committed by anyone, regardless of
their relationship to the victim, in any setting, including at home and at work. Rape is forced/coerced
intercourse and can be defined as nonconsensual sexual penetration, however slight, of any part of the
body of the victim with a sexual organ or of the anal or genital opening of the victim with any object
or any other part of the body. Marital rape is sexual intercourse forced on a spouse without consent.
(Source: Sexual Violence Research Initiative. Definitions)
4. Economic Violence: At the interpersonal level, economic abuse ranges from attempts to limit a
person’s ability to earn, inherit, or exercise control over funds or property. At the broader structural and
societal levels, economic violence can take the form of “limited access to funds and credit; controlled
access to health care, employment, or education; discriminatory traditional laws on inheritance and
property rights; and unequal remuneration for work.”47
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 75 minutes
KEY MESSAGES:
• GBV negatively impacts women, men, children, families, companies/organizations, and communities.
The effects are both physical and emotional and can lead to injury and death.
• GBV prevents women from reaching their full potential. This, in turn, prevents families and communities from
reaching their full potential.
• GBV in the workplace negatively affects women and, in many contexts, LGBTQI+ persons holds them back
from reaching their career goals, and creates an unhealthy and toxic environment.
• GBV in couples, referred to as intimate partner violence (IPV), prevents the partners from enjoying a strong,
healthy relationship.
• Children who witness or experience GBV in their homes are more likely to grow up to be violent. They also
face problems in their psychological, physical, and intellectual development.
• Relationships and families without GBV have the potential to grow stronger.
• GBV experienced anywhere—as IPV at home, as GBV in the community, or structurally—has a negative impact
on productivity, absenteeism, morale, and organizational culture within work settings.
MATERIALS: Flip chart paper, markers, masking tape, and copies of scenarios
PREPARATION: Photocopy the scenarios provided at the end of these instructions. Before doing so, make any
adjustments you feel will make the scenarios more real for your context without making significant changes. You
may, for example, want to change the names of the characters in the role-plays, reduce or increase the number of
children, or remove references to living with parents/in-laws if that is not usual in your setting.
Compile information on GBV resources and support services in the community.
PROCEDURE:
Trigger Warning: Discussing violence may be challenging for some. Give participants appropriate warnings
before each activity to allow them to decide if they would rather not take part in the activity and/or leave the
training space at any time they need to.
4. Alert the participants when there are five minutes remaining, when one minute remains, and when time
is up.
Discussion
1. After all of the groups have presented, ask participants: How do you think it affects our families,
workplaces, and communities when we condone and accept these forms of GBV in our relationships?
(Sample response: it prevents our communities from fully developing and perpetuates negative uses of
power between men and women.)
CLOSING STATEMENTS :
1. If there are no further questions, summarize with a focus on the following key points:
a. GBV negatively impacts women, men, children, families, companies, and communities. The effects are
both physical and emotional.
b. GBV prevents women from reaching their full potential. This, in turn, prevents families, companies, and
communities from reaching their full potential.
c. IPV in couples prevents partners from enjoying strong, healthy relationships.
d. Children who witness or experience GBV in their homes are more likely to grow up to be violent. They
also face problems in their psychological, physical, and intellectual development.
2. Bring participants’ attention to the GBV resources and services available in the community.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: It can be challenging for participants to think about the day-to-day
consequences of GBV that occur in everyday lives and in couples where violence is less extreme.
Participants may focus on extreme forms of violence and brainstorm only extreme consequences,
such as suicide, divorce, and dropping out of school.
The purpose of this exercise is to try to understand the common effects of GBV that affect all of us, such as
what it means for a relationship when one partner fears the other, in addition to those severe consequences. It is
important to help participants connect with this issue personally and to probe in ways that help them identify the
emotional impacts of GBV and the ways it hinders the healthy functioning of a couple, family, work environment,
and community.
When discussing the scenarios presented and what family members, friends, and/or work colleagues can do to
support the woman characters, remember and stress the importance of the survivor-centered approach.
Some participants may have experienced or witnessed similar scenes to the ones in the role plays.
John expects his house to be kept in good order and for things to be prepared for him properly. He often gets
angry with Maria when things are not how he wants them; for example, if he comes home late and the food has
gotten cold. When he gets angry, he shouts at Maria. He often beats her. He believes it is important to discipline
your wife in this way to maintain order in your household. Maria tries to accept the beatings rather than resisting.
If she accepts a beating, then it ends more quickly, and he won’t go after the children. She sometimes runs into
another room if he is beating her so that the children will not see. She does not seek any medical attention for
the bruises and cuts. After all, she knows that this is a private matter. And maybe, she wonders, she has done
something to deserve the beating. Maybe she could be a better wife. Most days, Maria works hard to prepare
everything exactly as he wants it, even though she is very tired, and prays silently that he will come home and be
peaceful. She waits anxiously as he comes through the door, unsure of what mood he will be in.
Discussion Questions
1. What kind of violence do you think this is?
4. How do you think John feels about himself? What do you think he believes about his power in this
relationship?
5. How do you think witnessing violence affects John and Maria’s children?
b. What does it teach them about relationships between men and women?
6. How do you think John’s behavior at home impacts power dynamics in his workplace, the way he interacts
with colleagues and subordinates, his energy and productivity, and those of others?
7. How do you think experiencing this violence might affect Maria’s ability to be successful and productive in
her workplace? How can Maria’s company, supervisors, and coworkers support her if they know about the
violence she experiences?
Sarah wakes up early in the morning to prepare the food and the house for everyone. She works throughout
the day and evening, is the last to eat dinner, and cleans up after everyone has finished. She is exhausted at the
end of the day. When Joseph comes home, he takes his meal and spends some time resting. When it is time for
bed, he initiates sex whenever he wants it. He does not care whether Sarah also wants sex and does nothing to
help prepare her. It is often painful for her. If she tries to refuse, Joseph gets angry and insists that it is his right as
a husband to have sex with his wife, becoming more aggressive. He sometimes shouts until she is afraid or uses
physical force to restrain her. Therefore, she has stopped refusing him and simply lets him do what he wants,
even if it hurts her. Sometimes the pain is too much, and she cries out, but he doesn’t seem to notice. Most
nights, she just prays inside that he doesn’t come home in the mood for sex. She dreads going into the bedroom
when
he is home.
Discussion Questions
1. What kind of violence do you think this is?
5. What do you think Joseph and Sarah will teach their children about sexuality?
6. How do you think Joseph’s attitude to sex might influence the way he interacts with male and female
colleagues and subordinates in the workplace?
7. How do you think experiencing this violence might affect Sarah’s ability to be successful and productive in
the workplace? How can Sarah’s company, supervisors, and coworkers support her if they know about the
violence she experiences?
Amal is not allowed to work outside the home. Mohammed is responsible for earning income, and he
controls how the money is used. He allocates some money to Amal to spend on household goods. Amal
can never be sure how much it will be or how much money they have. Her allotment changes each week,
and she is never sure whether Mohammed is earning less or spending money on other things. He gets angry
when they have less in the house than usual, such as food or soap, but Amal cannot discuss these things
with him. She has ideas about what to sell and to save, but she cannot share them with Mohammed; this is
not a woman’s place. When Mohammed comes home after spending time at the bar, Amal fears that he is
squandering their money on alcohol. On rare occasions when Amal has something to sell in the market, she
gives her earnings to Mohammed when she
returns home.
Discussion Questions
1. What kind of violence do you think this is?
5. How do you think it affects the relationship between Mohammed and Amal?
6. What do you think Mohammed and Amal’s children learn from this?
7. How do you think Mohammed’s attitude to controlling money management and decision-making might
influence the way he interacts with male and female colleagues and subordinates in the workplace?
Stephen believes that he is a good husband because he has property and earns some income. He often reminds
Paula that he gets paid more than she does, that he holds a more senior role than she does, and that it is he who
puts a roof over her head and food on her table, so she had better show that she is worth it. If he is unhappy
about something in the household, which is often, he shouts at Paula or calls her things like “stupid” and “dumb
woman.” He often criticizes her food and tells her he should’ve married a woman who at least knows how to
cook properly for her husband. But now he is “stuck” with her. Beyond that, they don’t talk much. Stephen
prefers to spend time with his friends than to be at home and takes his meals alone in the house. When he needs
something, he calls for Paula. She brings what he needs and then tries to leave him alone. She prefers not to speak
to him because she fears it will provoke him to criticize or complain about her.
Discussion Questions
1. What kind of violence do you think this is?
5. How do you think this affects their children and their development? What do you think this teaches their
children about relationships between men and women?
6. How do you think Stephen’s attitude of superiority to women and use of put-downs might influence the way
he interacts with male and female colleagues and subordinates in the workplace?
9. How do you think experiencing this violence might affect Paula’s ability to be successful and productive in
the workplace? How can Paula’s company, supervisors, and coworkers support her if they know about the
violence she experiences?
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 1 hour
OBJECTIVES: To define sexual exploitation, sexual abuse, and sexual harassment and explain the difference
between the three.
KEY MESSAGES: SEAH causes harm, creates an uncomfortable and/or unsafe workspace, is an affront to the
dignity of individuals, and undermines our commitment to gender equality.
PREPARATION: Flip charts with definitions of sexual exploitation, sexual abuse, and sexual harassment.
PROCEDURE:
Definitions—Group Work
1. Divide the participants into three groups and ask them to move to different parts of the room. Give each
group one term to define: sexual harassment, sexual exploitation, and sexual abuse.
2. Give ten minutes for the groups to talk through their term and come up with a definition that they will write
on a flip chart and post on a nearby wall.
49 Definitions adapted from USAID. (2020). Protection From Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PSEA) Policy.
Group Discussion
1. Use the following questions to stimulate reflection and analysis:
• What other forms of unacceptable behavior do you know of or have you witnessed in current or
previous workplace environments? Give examples.
• Probe: Bullying, microaggressions, put-downs
• Why do you think these occur? What type of power is being used, by whom, and for what purposes?
• How do these more subtle or less dramatic forms of harassment relate to our organizational code of
conduct and institutional values?
• What factors allow them to take place?
• What can we do individually, as teams, and as an organization to prevent SEAH and other forms of
harassment from taking place?
50 Definitions adapted from USAID. (2020). Protection From Sexual Exploitation and Abuse (PSEA) Policy.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender groups or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To analyze the tactics and strategies that men who sexually harass women (and/or nonbinary and LGBTQI+
persons) in the workplace use.
• To analyze the tactics and strategies that women (and/or nonbinary and LGBTQI+ persons) who are sexually
harassed in the workplace use to respond and protect themselves.
• To reflect on the links between harmful masculinities, sexual norms, and sexual harassment.
KEY MESSAGES:
• SH in the workplace involves the abuse of power and privilege (most commonly by men) and causes stress
and harm to those who are directly affected by it (mostly women and nonbinary and LGBTQI+ persons).
• When SH is tolerated and goes unchecked in a work environment, relationships and morale wane, and a toxic
atmosphere can arise. This can also cause problems with absenteeism and retention, reduce productivity, pose
brand and reputational risks that hinder talent acquisition, and possibly result in an increase in insurance and
litigation costs.
• Organizational cultures and work environments where SH is commonplace can see impacts on employee
hiring, retention, and corporate brand and reputation
PREPARATION: Review the SH video clips included below and decide which ones are relevant to your context.
PROCEDURE:
1. Choose video clips from the list below that are the most relevant to your context and to particular situations
that you have been grappling with recently.
2. Tell the participants that they are going to watch a series of video clips that depict cases of SH in the work
environment.
3. When watching each video clip, invite the participants to look out for the following:
• How power is exercised between people of different genders (and if relevant, other categories such as
race, ethnicity, age) and with different status and authority.
• The methods used by perpetrators to harass, exploit, and/or abuse.
• What victims do or say to evade or escape unwanted attention, touches, insinuations, or adulation.
• Expressions or incidents in the video that stand out, surprise them or provoke an emotional reaction
in them.
51 Developed by P. Welsh for CARE USA training material (as yet unpublished).
Further Reflections
1. When all videos have been watched and analyzed, use the following questions to stimulate further reflection
(note responses on a flip chart):
• Do you think the perpetrators in these video clips believe they are committing SH? Why/why not?
• What allows men to behave in the ways we have seen in the videos?
• How is SH linked to masculine norms and society’s expectations of what it means to be a “real man”?
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Some participants may experience discomfort or emotional stress during
this activity. Review “Navigating sensitive or taboo topics and dealing with difficult situations” and
“Dealing with feelings and emotions” in the Facilitation Guidelines section of this training manual.
• The Boss depicts a situation that occurs between a man in a senior role (the boss) and a woman in a
supportive/administrative role.
• The Politician depicts a situation that occurs between a male politician and a female journalist.
• The Coworker depicts a situation between a male bartender and a female colleague.
• The Photographer depicts a situation between a young model and an older professional photographer on a
photo shoot.
• Workplace Sexual Harassment PSA: Public service video on workplace SH faced by women, created by
Arjun Sambyal.
1.5 State Resource Centre for Women, Women, and Child Development Department,
Haryana, India
• Sexual Harassment: Know Where the Line Is (testimonies; longer version, four minutes)
• What is Sexual Harassment: Know Where the Line Is: What does SH in the workplace look like? (short
version, one minute and 40 seconds)
• Bystander Story—Ellie. Sexual harassment: Know Where the Line Is. (One minute, 39 seconds)
• Nadine’s Story: Freedom from Discrimination, Harassment and Violence (testimony of a woman engineer
in a male-dominated work setting)
1.11 Internews,Tanzania
• Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: This public service announcement marks the 16 days of activism
theme of GBV in the workplace. Credit: Amin Suwedi, cameraperson and editor.
• Emotional sexual harassment short film: A young woman is harassed and stalked by a group of three
young men (evocative music and gripping scenes; mostly dialogue-free but some Bengali at the end
without subtitles).
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender groups or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To deepen understanding of SH in the workplace, how it is related to harmful masculinities, and
the possible consequences for women and LGBTQI+ persons and for workplace environments.
KEY MESSAGES: Dating and romance between staff members can contribute to tensions in the workplace,
especially when things do not work out. When one person persists despite the other person making it clear they
are not interested, SH can occur. In general, it is best to avoid workplace dating and romance. This is particularly
problematic when there is a hierarchal imbalance between the two people, such as a supervisor and supervisee.
Sexual innuendos, sexually explicit statements, and derogatory remarks about people’s appearance and sexuality
have no place in the workplace, as they are offensive, harmful, and divisive.
Rude jokes and teasing that have sexual content and implications are often shrugged off as “just a bit of fun,”
but they can be hurtful and destructive. Targets of SH through jokes are often dismissed as uptight or too serious,
putting the onus on them to change their behavior to accommodate harmful practices that negatively affect
organizational cultures.
An offer to trade job benefits for sexual favors by someone with authority over another in the workplace is
quid-pro-quo SH and is a severe abuse of power.
In cultures that are highly patriarchal and homophobic, LGBTQI+ persons are often subjected to SH,
discrimination, and bullying that can have devastating personal and professional consequences. Thus, the need to
build organizational cultures based on respect for human rights and dignity and equal opportunities for all is clear.
PREPARATION: Read the stories well in advance of the training session to make sure you grasp their content
and logic.
PROCEDURE:
1. In the main group, read one of the stories and, using the questions provided, dialogue with the participants.
2. Allow time for questions, reflections, and suggestions.
3. Choose another story and repeat the process.
4. Only use stories 5 and 6 if you think that the group is in a position to deal constructively with issues of
human sexuality and gender identities that, in many settings, may be culturally taboo and threatening.
52 Case studies adapted from Sexual Harassment Prevention Training New York State 2019, pages 17 – 24 – similar activity developed by P Welsh for CARE 2020.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Use as many stories as you have time for, giving priority to those stories
that highlight areas of particular concern and/or interest.
Veronica’s coworker Matthew has just been through a divorce. He drops comments on a few occasions that he is
lonely and needs to find a new girlfriend.Veronica and Matthew have been friendly in the past and have had lunch
together in local restaurants on many occasions. Matthew asks Veronica to go on a date with him—dinner and a
movie.Veronica likes Matthew and agrees to go out with him. She enjoys her date with Matthew but decides that a
relationship is not a good idea. She thanks Matthew for a nice time but explains that she does not want to have a
relationship with him. Matthew waits two weeks and then starts pressuring Veronica for more dates. She refuses, but
Matthew does not stop. He keeps asking her to go out with him.
2. Use the following questions to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 1. When Matthew first asked Veronica for a date, this was sexual harassment. True or false?
FALSE: Matthew’s initial comments about looking for a girlfriend and asking Veronica, a coworker, for a
date are not SH. Even if Veronica had turned Matthew down for the first date, Matthew would have done
nothing wrong by asking for a date and by making occasional comments that are not sexually explicit about
his personal life.
Question 2. Veronica cannot complain of sexual harassment because she went on a date with Matthew.
True or false?
FALSE: Being friendly, going on a date, or even having a prior relationship with a coworker does not mean
that the coworker has a right to behave as Matthew did toward Veronica. She has to continue working with
Matthew, and he must respect her wishes and not engage in behavior that has now become inappropriate for
the workplace.
Veronica complains to her supervisor, and the supervisor (as required) reports her complaint to the person designated
by her employer to receive complaints. Matthew is questioned about his behavior, and he apologizes. He is instructed
by the designated person to stop. Matthew stops for a while but then starts leaving little gifts for Veronica on her desk
with accompanying love notes.The love notes are not overtly offensive, but Matthew’s behavior is starting to make
Veronica nervous, as she is afraid that he may start stalking her.
4. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
FALSE: Veronica should report Matthew’s behavior. She was entitled to have effective assistance in getting
Matthew to stop his inappropriate workplace behavior. Because Matthew has returned to pestering Veronica
after being told to stop, he could be subject to serious disciplinary action for his behavior.
Sharon transfers to a new location with her employer. Her new supervisor, Paul, is friendly and helps her become
familiar with her new job duties. After a few days, when no one else is around, Paul comes over to Sharon’s work area
to chat. Paul tells her that he went to a strip club the previous night. Sharon is shocked that Paul would bring up such
a topic in the workplace and says nothing in response. Paul continues talking and says that all the women in the office
are so unattractive that he needs to get out and “see some hot chicks” once in a while. He tells Sharon he is glad she
joined the staff because, unlike the others, she is “easy on the eyes.” Sharon feels very offended and demeaned that
she and the other women in her workplace are being evaluated on their looks by their supervisor.
2. Use the following questions to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 1. Because Paul did not tell Sharon that she is unattractive, he has not harassed her. True or false?
FALSE: Paul made sexually explicit statements to Sharon, which are derogatory and demeaning to Sharon and
her female coworkers. It does not matter that Paul supposedly paid Sharon a compliment. The discussion is still
highly offensive to Sharon, as it would be to most reasonable persons in her situation.
Question 2. By bringing up his visit to the strip club, Paul engaged in inappropriate workplace behavior.
True or false?
TRUE: Simply bringing up the visit to the strip club was inappropriate in the workplace, especially for a
supervisor, and it would be appropriate for Sharon to report this conduct. A one-time comment about going to
a strip club is behavior that Paul would be told to stop, even though it probably would not rise to the level of
unlawful harassment unless it was repeated on multiple occasions.
Question 3. Paul should be instructed to stop making these types of comments, but this is not a serious
matter. True or false?
FALSE: Paul’s comments about female employees are a serious matter and show his contempt for women in
the workplace. Paul is required to model appropriate behavior and must not exhibit contempt for employees
on the basis of sex or any protected characteristic. Sharon should not have to continue to work for someone
she knows harbors such contempt for women, nor should the other employees have to work for such a
supervisor. Management should be aware of this, even if the other employees are not, and Paul should be
disciplined and, most likely, removed from his current position.
Carla works as a licensed heavy equipment operator. Some of her male coworkers think it is fun to tease her. Carla
often hears comments like “Watch out, here she comes–that crazy woman driver!” in a joking manner. Also, someone
keeps putting a handmade sign on the only portable toilet at the worksite that says, “Men Only.”
2. Use the following questions to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 1. Women in traditionally male jobs should expect teasing and should not take joking comments
too seriously. True or false?
FALSE: Whether Carla is being harassed depends in part on Carla’s opinion of the situation; that is, whether
she finds the behavior offensive. However, if at any point Carla does feel harassed, she is entitled to complain
about the behavior and have it stopped, regardless of whether and for how long she has endured the behavior
without complaint. Carla can always say when enough is enough.
Question 2. Carla cannot complain because the site supervisor sometimes joins in with the joking behavior,
so she has nowhere to go. True or false?
FALSE: Carla can still complain to the supervisor, who is then on notice that the behavior bothers Carla
and must be stopped. If the supervisor fails to take Carla’s complaint seriously, that will constitute serious
misconduct on his or her part. Carla can also complain directly to the person designated by her employer to
receive complaints, either instead of going to the supervisor or after doing so. The employer is responsible for
ensuring that all employees are aware of its anti-harassment policies and procedures.
Some of Carla’s other coworkers are strongly opposed to her presence in the traditionally all-male profession.
These coworkers have sometimes said things to her like, “You’re taking a job away from a man who deserves it,”
“You should be home with your kids,” and “What kind of a mother are you?” Also, someone scratched the word “bitch”
on Carla’s toolbox.
4. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 3. These behaviors, while rude, are not sexual harassment because they are not sexual in nature.
True or false?
FALSE: The behaviors are directed at her because she is a woman and appears to be intended to intimidate
her and cause her to quit her job. While not sexual in nature, this harassment is because of her sex and will
create a hostile work environment if it is sufficiently severe or frequent.
Carla complains about the jokes and other behaviors, and an investigation is conducted. It cannot be determined who
defaced Carla’s toolbox. Her coworkers are told to stop their behavior or face disciplinary charges.The supervisor
speaks with Carla and tells her to come to him immediately if she has any further problems. Carla then finds that
someone has urinated in her toolbox.
6. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 4. There is nothing Carla can do because she cannot prove who vandalized her toolbox.
True or false?
Tatiana is hoping for a promotion to a position that she knows will become vacant soon. She knows that her boss,
David, will be involved in deciding who will be promoted. She tells David that she will be applying for the position and
that she is very interested in receiving the promotion. David says, “We’ll see.There will be a lot of others interested in
the position.”
A week later,Tatiana and David travel together on state business, including an overnight hotel stay. Over dinner, David
tells Tatiana that he hopes he will be able to promote her because he has always really enjoyed working with her. He
tells her that some other candidates “look better on paper” but that she is the one he wants. He tells her that he can
“pull some strings” to get her into the job and Tatiana thanks David. Later David suggests that they go to his hotel
room for “drinks and some relaxation.”Tatiana declines his “offer.”
2. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
TRUE: David’s behavior as Tatiana’s boss is inappropriate, and Tatiana should feel free to report the behavior
if it makes her uncomfortable. It is irrelevant that this behavior occurs away from the workplace. Their
relationship is that of supervisor and supervisee, and all their interactions will impact the workplace.
After they return from the trip,Tatiana asks David if he knows when the job will be posted so that she can apply.
He says that he is not sure, but there is still time for her to “make it worth his while” to pull strings for her. He then
asks, “How about going out to dinner this Friday and then coming over to my place?”
4. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
TRUE: It is now evident that David has offered to help Tatiana with her promotion in exchange for sexual
favors.
Tatiana, who really wants the position, decides to go out with David. Almost every Friday, they go out at David’s
insistence and engage in sexual activity.Tatiana does not want to be in a relationship with David and is only going
out with him because she believes that he will otherwise block her promotion.
6. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 3. Tatiana cannot complain of harassment because she voluntarily engaged in sexual activity with
David. True or false?
FALSE: Because Tatiana does not welcome sexual activity, she is a target of SH. Equally, if she had refused
8. Use the following questions to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 4. Tatiana cannot complain of harassment because she got the job, so there is no discrimination
against her. True or false?
FALSE: Tatiana can be the recipient of SH whether or not she receives the benefit that was used as an
inducement.
Tatiana breaks off the sexual activities with David. He then gives her a bad evaluation, and she is removed from her
new position at the end of the probationary period and returns to her old job.
10. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 5. It is now too late for Tatiana to complain. Losing a place of favor due to the breakup of the
voluntary relationship does not create a claim for sexual harassment. True or false?
FALSE: It is true that the breakup of a relationship, if truly consensual and welcomed at the time, usually does
not create a claim for SH. However, the “relationship” in this case was never welcomed by Tatiana. David’s
behavior has at all times been inappropriate and a serious violation of the employer’s policy. As the person
who abused the power and authority of a management position, David has engaged in SH.
NOTE: Only use stories 5 and 6 below if you think the group is in a position to deal constructively with issues
of human sexuality and gender identities that, in many settings, may be culturally taboo and threatening.
Keisha has noticed that her new boss, Sarah, leans extremely close to her when they are going over the reports that
she prepares. Sarah touches Keisha’s hand or shoulder frequently as they discuss work. Keisha tries to move away
from her in these situations, but Sarah doesn’t seem to get the message.
2. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
FALSE: If Keisha is uncomfortable with Sarah’s behavior, she has options. If she feels comfortable doing
so, she should tell Sarah to please back off because her closeness and touching make Keisha uncomfortable.
Another option is to complain directly to a person designated by her employer to receive complaints, who
will speak with Sarah. Although this may not be sufficiently severe or pervasive to create an unlawful
harassment situation (unless it is repeated by Sarah after she is told to stop), there is no reason for Keisha
to be uncomfortable in the workplace. There is no valid reason for Sarah to engage in this behavior.
Before Keisha gets around to complaining, Sarah brushes up against her back in the conference room before a
meeting. Keisha is now getting really annoyed but still puts off doing anything about it. Later, Sarah “traps” Keisha in
her office after they finish discussing work by standing between her and the door of the small office. Keisha doesn’t
know what to do, so she moves past Sarah to get out. As she does so, Sarah runs her hand over Keisha’s breast.
4. Use the following questions to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 2. Sarah’s brushing up against Keisha in the conference room could just be inadvertent and does not
give Keisha any additional grounds to complain about Sarah. True or false?
FALSE: Sarah is now engaging in a pattern of escalating behavior. Given the pattern of her “too close” and
“touching” behavior, it is unlikely that this was inadvertent. Even before being “trapped” in Sarah’s office, Keisha
should have reported all of the behaviors she experienced that made her uncomfortable.
Question 3. Sarah touching Keisha’s breast is inappropriate but is probably not unlawful harassment because
it only happened once. True or false?
FALSE: Any type of sexual touching is very serious and does not need to be repeated to constitute SH.
Keisha should immediately report it without waiting for it to be repeated. Sarah can expect to receive formal
discipline, including possible firing.
Leonard works as a clerk typist for a large employer. He likes to wear jewelry, and his attire frequently includes
earrings and necklaces. His boss, Margaret, thinks it’s “weird” that, as a man, Leonard wears jewelry and wants
to be a clerical worker. She frequently makes sarcastic comments to him about his appearance and refers to him
“jokingly” as her office boy. Leonard, who hopes to develop his career in the area of customer relations, applies for
an open promotional position that would involve working in a front desk area, where he would interact with the public.
Margaret tells Leonard that if he wants that job, he had better look “more normal” or else wait for a promotion to
mailroom supervisor.
2. Use the following questions to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 1. Leonard’s boss is correct in telling him wearing jewelry is inappropriate for customer service
positions. True or false?
FALSE: Leonard’s jewelry is only an issue because Margaret considers it unusual for a man to wear such
jewelry. Therefore, her comments to Leonard constitute gender stereotyping.
Margaret also is suspicious that Leonard is gay, which she says she “doesn’t mind,” but she thinks Leonard is
“secretive.” She starts asking him questions about his private life, such as, “Are you married?” “Do you have a
partner?” “Do you have kids?” Leonard tries to respond “no” politely to all her questions but is becoming annoyed.
Margaret starts gossiping with Leonard’s coworkers about his supposed sexual orientation.
4. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
TRUE: Leonard is being harassed on the basis of sex because Margaret is harassing him for failure to adhere
to her gender stereotypes.
Leonard is also being harassed on the basis of his perceived sexual orientation. It does not matter whether
or not Leonard is a gay man in order for him to have a claim for sexual-orientation harassment.
Leonard decides that he is not going to get a fair chance at the promotion under these circumstances, and he
complains to the employer’s designee about Margaret’s behavior.The designee does an investigation and tells
Margaret that Leonard’s jewelry is not in violation of any workplace rule, that she is to consider him for the position
without regard for his gender, and that she must stop making harassing comments, asking Leonard intrusive
questions, and gossiping about his personal life. Margaret stops her comments, questions, and gossiping, but she then
recommends a woman be promoted to the open position.The woman promoted has much less experience than
Leonard and lacks his two-year degree in customer relations from a community college.
6. Use the following question to stimulate analysis and dialogue among the participants before revealing the
correct answer.
Question 3. Leonard has likely been the target of discrimination on the basis of sex and sexual orientation
and/or retaliation. True or false?
TRUE: We do not know Margaret’s reason for not recommending Leonard for the promotion, but it does not
look good for Margaret. It appears that she is either biased against Leonard for the same reasons she harassed
him, that she is retaliating because he complained, or both.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender groups or single-gender groups.
TIME: 30 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To analyze and understand the human and economic costs of SH in the workplace.
KEY MESSAGES:
• SH has human and economic costs for individuals and businesses.
• SH in the workplace can lead to a toxic work environment, reduce productivity, and threaten the reputation of
organizations.
PREPARATION: Review the International Center for Research on Women (ICRW) report linked below before
carrying out the activity. Prepare brief summaries of the company’s SH policy and reporting mechanisms.
PROCEDURE:
Brainstorm
1. Ask the participants: What are the human costs of SH in the workplace?
Note their answers on flip chart paper.
2. Ask the participants: What are the economic costs of SH?
a. To individuals?
b. To companies/organizations?
Note their answers on flip chart paper.
3. Ask the participants: What can we do to prevent SH in the workplace?
Note their answers on flip chart paper.
Briefly summarize the organization’s policy regarding SH in the workplace.
4. Ask the participants: What can/should we do when we think or suspect that SH is occurring in the workplace?
Note their answers on flip chart paper.
Briefly summarize responsibilities and reporting mechanisms for SH in the organization.
Emphasize the importance of the survivor-centered approach, which respects the needs, interests, and
decisions of the person being sexually harassed.
The Costs of SH
1. Use the ICRW report “The Costs of Sex-Based Harassment to Businesses: An In-Depth Look at the
Workplace” to highlight the key ideas related to the costs of SH. You may create slides based on this report
or share copies or excerpts (Link).
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Emphasize that SH has both human and organizational costs.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: When presenting the PowerPoint presentation, refer back to the
responses and reflections of the participants during the initial brainstorming session to reinforce their
own analysis and clarify areas where there are doubts or uncertainties.
For groups interested in learning more about the business impact of sex-based harassment, see ICRW’s report
“The Costs of Sex-Based Harassment to Businesses: An In-Depth Look at the Workplace” (Link).
• Sex-based harassment encapsulates a wide range of behaviors that degrade or humiliate an individual based on
their sex and/or gender. Three different categories of behavior define sex-based harassment:
− “Gender harassment” refers to verbal and nonverbal behaviors that demean women and/or femininity or
create a hostile work environment but do not have the goal of sexual cooperation.
− “Unwanted sexual attention” refers to behaviors such as pressure for dates and unwanted touching that
express a romantic or sexual interest but are unreciprocated and unwelcome.
− “Sexual coercion” pertains to behaviors that promise promotion, raises, or better assignments in return
for sexual cooperation or that threaten the loss of a job, unfavorable work assignments, or loss of pay if
the victim does not comply.
• Impacts affect the individual experiencing the harassment, team dynamics, and overall company culture. As
much as the human element and impact can be severe, there is also a strong business case against it.
− Exposure to the sex-based harassment of coworkers has the potential to foster bystander stress and other
negative outcomes such as team conflict, declines in the team’s financial performance, and occupational
stress for team members.
− When companies let sex-based harassment go unaddressed in their workplaces, they are less likely to
attract top candidates. This poses significant recruitment challenges.
− The replacement costs for an individual employee vary by industry and by the level of the position;
however, on average, the literature reports that recruitment costs range from $5,000 to $10,000 for hourly
employees, $7,500 to $12,500 for mid-level employees, and $75,000 to $211,000 for high-level employees.
− Although estimates of costs vary, one source estimates that out-of-court settlements average $75,000,
while cases that go to trial average $217,000 in jury-awarded damages when the plaintiff wins.
− Employment practices liability insurance (EPLI) is the primary insurance cost associated with workplace
sex-based harassment. It “provides coverage to employers against claims made by employees alleging
discrimination (based on sex, race, age or disability), wrongful termination, harassment, and other
employment-related issues.”
− The impact of sex-based harassment on brand reputation is difficult to quantify; however, evidence shows
that sex-based harassment is linked to external reputational damage.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender groups or single-gender groups.
TIME: 2 hours
KEY MESSAGES:
• The organization takes SH in the workplace seriously and will address it in accordance with a survivor-centered
approach.
• GBV is common in our communities and has negative implications for workplace environments and relations.
• Having knowledge of internal policy and procedures on GBV/SH, national legislation, available GBV support
and response services, and the survivor-centered approach means we can take personal and collective actions
that prioritize the need, interests, and safety of survivors of all forms of GBV, including SH in the workplace.
PREPARATION: Make one photocopy per participant of Participant Handout 5: Effective GBV Policies.
You will need to invite and prepare an internal expert with specialized knowledge of internal SH, GBV, and
safeguarding policies and procedures. This might be staff from human resources or dedicated SH and/or
safeguarding staff.
If the internal expert you invite does not have specialized knowledge of national GBV legislation, GBV support
and response services, and the survivor-centered approach to preventing and responding to GBV, you can liaise
with external specialists (for example, specialists from women’s rights organizations).
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: INTERNAL SH, GBV, AND SAFEGUARDING POLICIES
1. Ask the group the following questions, noting their responses on the flip chart:
a. What do you know about our internal policies and procedures on preventing and responding to SH in
the workplace and other forms of GBV?
b. What do you know about current national legislation on GBV and/or other related issues (for example,
equal opportunities, antidiscrimination, or other human rights–related laws)?
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Make sure you coordinate with the internal human resources and/or
external GBV experts before the activity and agree on how much time they will have and which aspects
you want them to emphasize.
If you cannot find an expert on GBV legislation, use this UN Women resource, if necessary, to access the current
legislation in your country: Global Database on Violence Against Women. For any identified gaps in the company
policies, use the Engendering Industries Survivor-Centered Approaches to Workplace Sexual Harassment and
Other Forms of Gender-Based Violence Guide to advocate for and inform the development of a survivor-
centered approach/policy to prevent and respond to workplace sexual harassment and GBV.
Below are characteristics of effective, survivor-centered GBV policies. For more information, see:
Engendering Industries Survivor-Centered Approaches to Workplace Sexual Harassment and Other Forms
of Gender-Based Violence Guide.
• Clear roles and responsibilities outline who is responsible for policy implementation and who is
accountable for ensuring that the policy is upheld.
• A clear description of the reporting procedure, including survivor-centered approaches that provide
respect, safety, and confidentiality to victims, the perpetrator, and any witnesses. This should include a
clear action plan that articulates the response timeline and specific steps the company will take.
• A description of the rights of victims, the accused, and witnesses, if any. Clear prohibition and
punishment of retaliation for reporting.
• Fair and transparent investigation and resolution processes that are managed by trained professionals and
create a supportive environment in which victims can come forward without fear of stigma or retribution.
• Resources for employees who might need additional support (psychological, physical, medical, legal,
economic). These resources might be provided internally or externally.
• Monitoring and evaluation targets/indicators that measure progress and performance over time to
ensure that the policy is effectively implemented. This includes the delivery of surveys on SH and the
workplace climate on a regular basis.
• Benchmarking to ensure that the policy meets or exceeds national and international legislation and best
practice.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 45 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To understand allyship and analyze our experiences of allyship in society and in the workplace.
KEY MESSAGES: Allyship entails a person or group that enjoys privilege taking a stance to show their solidarity
with marginalized or oppressed persons or groups and taking actions that contribute to ending that marginalization
or oppression.
PREPARATION: Review the activity and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
PROCEDURE:
Small Group Work
1. Form three or four groups. Give the following questions for the groups to consider:
• What do you understand by “ally” and “allyship”?
• Why is allyship important?
• In practice, what does allyship look like?
• Share experiences when you have been an ally to another person or group.
53 Conceptualizations taken from materials developed by the Ada Initiative, Ada Initiative 2011–2015.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Close by highlighting the key messages from the beginning of this activity.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: If time is limited, you can carry out the first exercise in the main group as
a brainstorming exercise instead of in small groups.
If you have sufficient time available, you could end the activity with this TedTalk by Melinda Epler: 3 ways to be a
better ally in the workplace and to support people who are underrepresented in the workplace. “Gender, race,
ethnicity, religion, disability, and sexual orientation are among the many factors that affect our opportunities,
and it’s up to each of us to be allies for those who face discrimination.” “There’s no magic wand for correcting
diversity and inclusion.” “Change happens one person at a time, one act at a time, one word at a time.”
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To discuss the qualities of a safe work environment.
• To identify challenges to creating a safe work environment and how to overcome them through allyship.
KEY MESSAGES: Creating and maintaining a safe work environment requires individual and collective
commitment to equality, respect, and trust in ways that foster authentic connection and growth.
PROCEDURE:
Individual and Group Reflections
1. Explain that creating safer work environments is a process of creating personal and collective commitments
on how we will interact with each other at work in ways that foster respect, collaboration, and equal
opportunities.
2. In the main group, read out each of the following statements. After each one, give time for participants to
write down their responses. Tell them that they will then share those responses in small groups.
a. The qualities of a safe work environment that are most important to me are…
These are most important to me because…
b. The qualities of a safe work environment that are most challenging for me to follow are…
These are most challenging for me to follow me because…
I can try to manage these challenges by…
c. The qualities of a safe work environment that I think will be challenging for members of my team or
department in promoting gender equality are…
Some ideas for how we can overcome some of these challenges include…
d. A time when I felt really safe sharing personal information was when…
If I really think about it, what made me feel so safe was…
3. Form three or four groups and ask each to share their thoughts on each of the above statements.
4. In the main group, get feedback from the small groups on the reflections and discussions that took place
about each of the statements.
55 Adapted for this manual from: SASA Together – Raising Voices, Start Phase (Manual), pages 220-222.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Invite the participants to carry out the following exercises.
1. For one week, write down moments when you feel judgmental toward others in the work environment.
At the end of the week, look for patterns and common triggers to help you develop strategies for
becoming more accepting.
2. For one week, write down moments when you feel safe in the work environment in the presence of others.
At the end of the week, look for patterns to help you discover where and how you feel most safe; think
about how you can create more such spaces for yourself in the work environment.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: You can form groups to do the reading collectively and reflect on the
questions, then have a large-group session for the small groups to present their discussions. Highlight
similarities and differences that emerge from the different groups for discussion.
This and the next two activities (Activity 8.3 Allyship: Walking the talk and Activity 8.4 Allyship: Putting our values
into practice) work together as a unit and can be used when there is a specific need to address issues of staff
behavior, practices, and relations that create and contribute to unhealthy, inequitable work environments.
NOTES:
We can never create a perfectly safe work environment because no one has complete control over what others
think, say, do, or believe. However, we can create safer work environments that reflect our organizational
values and commitment to equal opportunities and human rights. We can decide individually and collectively to
practice behaviors that encourage each other to put our shared values into practice. Here are six qualities of a
safer work environment.
1. Confidentiality
Confidentiality means keeping things secret or private. In rich, professional discussions, people may share
personal experiences or stories to help relay a lesson, illustrate an idea, create a personal connection, or explain
a need for support. When working in a safer work environment, there is a common understanding that private
aspects of what is shared—people’s names, revealing details, sensitive topics—are never repeated beyond the
work environment and company in which they were first expressed. Key themes and ideas can be referred to
openly, but no one ever has to fear that people will expose their private sharing to others.
2. Nonjudgmental Behavior
In a nonjudgmental, equitable work environment, people are supported rather than looked down upon as they
work through moments of personal and professional growth. For example, our internal policies to prevent
and respond to SH and GBV may focus on equality and mutual respect, but each of us has prejudices and
unconscious biases that can lead us to discriminate against others (and others against us). As we interact in the
work environment, we may say and do things that even surprise us. The belief that some groups (such as men,
certain ethnic groups, or rich people) are better than others is so entrenched in our society that it can influence
our perspectives and behavior in the workspace despite our best intentions. Part of becoming more self-aware
includes discovering those biases within us and the harmful practices we manifest. In a safer work environment,
as we acknowledge them, we can take responsibility for and change them, all amid support and encouragement
from colleagues.
3. Direct Communication
Part of creating a safer work environment is about speaking openly when we feel upset, hurt, or angry by
something someone said or did. In this way, no one is ever left wondering if others are holding negative feelings
toward them. One way to do this is by using “I” statements: “When you said ______, I felt _______ because….”
Using statements like this may be challenging at first, but it ultimately allows us to create the safer work
environment we desire.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To reflect on our values and how to put them into practice as allies in our organizations.
KEY MESSAGES: Acting as allies in accordance with our values can be challenging in work environments where
prejudices and discrimination are present and accepted as the norm.
PROCEDURE:
Walking the Talk
1. Explain that this activity builds on the idea of living our personal and company values and focusing on
concrete ways we can do this:
“It’s often easy to talk about values but harder to live them.Words can become empty if our behaviors are
different, and our credibility—as individuals and as an organization—can be compromised. On the other hand,
when we demonstrate our values through our actions, our words become more powerful, and our integrity
shines through.”
Guided Reflection
1. Give participants a sheet of A4 paper and invite them to write their top three personal values on the far-left
side of the page, putting space in between them.
2. Then, ask them to draw three columns across the page. In the first column, write next to each value the
actions they usually take that match that value; in the second, write the actions they sometimes take that
contradict that value; and in the third, write the impact or consequences of not following that value has on
their life.
Value 2
Value 3
Encourage the participants to be as honest as possible. This is for their own reflection and self-awareness.
56 Adapted for this manual from: SASA Together – Raising Voices, Start Phase (Manual), pages 193-194.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Invite the participants to carry out the following exercises.
• “For one week, write down each courageous thing you do to better align your actions with your values.
At the end of the week, review your list and post it somewhere visible for inspiration.”
• “Choose someone with integrity whom you admire. Meet with them to discuss their experiences and tips for living
one’s values.”
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: You can form groups to do the reading collectively and reflect on the
questions and then have a larger group session for the small groups to present their discussions.
Highlight similarities and differences that emerge from the different groups for discussion.
NOTES:
1. Slow down. Your values are always guiding you, but sometimes life moves too quickly to notice.
2. Regularly reflect on your values. Make time to reflect on your values and whether your actions are
aligned with them. Such reflection can be as simple as thinking on your way to work or while lying in bed,
or journaling before you sleep.
3. Use your values as a tool. When facing a challenge, use your values to find the solution. Think about the
values you believe in most and how you could handle the challenge if guided by them.
4. Connect with others who live their values. Acting according to your values is a value in itself: integrity.
Spending time with others who have personal integrity can inspire you to live according to your values, even
when it feels difficult.
5. Have deliberate conversations with those close to you about values. Often, even in our closest
relationships, we haven’t taken the time to talk about our values, why they are important to us, and how they
guide us. Begin this conversation with family, friends, and colleagues.
6. Verbalize your values. If you fear that living your values will seem like an inappropriate action to others,
verbalize your value to explain your choice (for example, “I have made this decision because I value…”).
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 90 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To identify actions that we can take to be proactive allies for gender equality in the workplace,
including for the prevention of and response to sexism and SH in the workplace.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Discriminatory attitudes and practices are often present in workplace environments and go unchallenged,
as they are seen as “normal.”
• It can take courage to speak up against discrimination and abuse.
• Challenging discriminatory attitudes, practices, and policies are necessary to build equitable work environments
that reflect organizational values.
PREPARATION: Make signs on A4 paper with “No Courage,” “Some Courage,” and “A Lot of Courage”
written on them. Print out the set of action cards (attached at the end of this activity) on cards and cut them.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: INTRODUCTION (5 MINUTES)
1. Create a “Spectrum of Courage” on the wall by sticking the “No Courage” sign on the left side of the wall,
the “Some Courage” sign in the middle, and the “A Lot of Courage” sign on the right.
2. Explain that there are many actions we can take to strengthen healthy relationships in the workplace and
to contribute to equality and the prevention of and response to sexism and SH in the workplace. Some of
these actions will take more courage than others.
57 From Sonke Gender Justice Network, Sonke Change Manual, 203; Originally included in Sonke Gender Justice Network, One Man Can, 86.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Conclude by asking a few participants to share what concrete action they will
take as a result of this exercise. Ask where their proposed action falls on the courage continuum of allyship,
who they will inform of their commitment, and how they will follow through on their commitment.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: When facilitating the Spectrum of Courage, be careful not to overrun
the time allotment.
Similarly, keep the preparation time for the role-plays to no more than ten minutes to maximize the time available
for these and the subsequent analysis.
Allow some time after each role-play for initial reactions and analysis, but make sure you have enough time left for
participants to reflect and discuss after all the role-plays have been acted out.
NOTES:
Ask my colleagues of a
Let a colleague know that I different gender about
think they are abusing their their experience in the
authority. office (or unit, or section)
and share mine.
Speak up to a colleague
Speak up as an advocate
who makes a sexist joke
for gender equality every
and tell them to stop. Do
time I speak at an event
not implicitly condone
outside my department
sexist jokes by ignoring
or team.
them.
Directly challenge
colleagues who do not
Speak up as an advocate
measure up to our
for gender equality every
standards of conduct and
time I chair a staff meeting.
remind them of their
contractual obligations.
Speak up in a meeting
File a formal report against
when a colleague makes
a male colleague for sexual
derogatory remarks about
abuse, but only with the
the performance of women
consent of the victim.
colleagues.
Tell a survivor of
harassment that I am Put an anti-harassment
willing to confirm their poster up at my
story if they choose to file workstation.
a complaint.
Acknowledge that my
Always recognize and
decisions may be biased
give credit to the person
and take active measures
implementing a great idea.
to change.
Sponsor a woman
Stand up for the rights of colleague to take up a
LGBTQI+ persons in the professional assignment
workplace. that could benefit her
career.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To discuss how allies can develop and use safe and effective outcome-based interventions to
prevent and interrupt sexist behaviors, harassment, bullying, and violence in workplace settings.
KEY MESSAGES: There are safe and constructive ways to prevent and interrupt sexist behaviors, harassment,
bullying, and violence, which may differ based on the situation, personal preference, and safety.
While there is no “right” way to prevent or respond to and interrupt sexist behaviors, harassment, bullying, and
violence in every setting, there are many options, and if you think creatively, you can almost always find something
that will work.
All bystander interventions should consider unintended risks and/or consequences that can occur carefully,
particularly for the person experiencing harassment, bullying, or violence.
MATERIALS: Flipchart paper, markers, masking tape, photocopies Participant Handout 6: Bystander Intervention
Scenarios
PROCEDURE:
Giving and Receiving Constructive Feedback
1. Ask participants the following question, and tell them that their answers will relate to the next exercise:
When you have done something wrong or made a mistake, such as something that hurts another person or leads
to conflict in your family or workplace, how would you prefer that people let you know?
2. Ak participants to provide answers, writing them on a flipchart. Possible answers include the following
examples; if some of these are not mentioned, feel free to bring them up for discussion:
• I prefer that someone takes me aside after it happens and speaks to me privately instead of embarrassing
me in front of the whole community.
• I prefer constructive criticism telling me what I can do better rather than just attacking me for what I did
wrong.
• I think it is more effective when the criticism is focused on the behavior and is not a personal attack on my
character.
58 Adapted from: Equimundo-US and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. 2018. Manhood 2.0: A Curriculum Promoting a Gender-Equitable Future of Manhood.
Washington, DC and Pittsburgh: Promundo and University of Pittsburgh. (Link)
Group Work
1. In this exercise, participants will be divided into small groups to brainstorm and demonstrate ways to
intervene effectively to prevent and interrupt sexist behaviors, harassment, bullying, and violence in the
workplace. Divide participants into groups of four or five, and then give them directions for the first part
of the exercise.
2. Give each group of participants one of the scenarios in Participant Handout 6: Bystander Intervention
Scenarios.
3. Instruct participants to read the scenarios out loud in their group and then develop a short skit in which
they demonstrate the sexism, harassment, bullying, or violence in the scenario, as well as one or more
interventions that people like themselves could use to stop the negative action.
They should think about how the intervention respects the needs and interests of the person on the
receiving end of harassment or violence, how it can be effective and safe (for all involved) and prevent future
harassment, bullying, or violence. They should also keep in mind their brainstorming in the first part of this
exercise about how they like to be confronted when they have made a mistake or done something wrong.
Skit Presentations
1. Invite the groups to present their skits (one by one).
2. After each skit performance, ask the larger group to describe the intervention(s) that they saw used. Keep
a list of the interventions on the flipchart to discuss after the groups have presented. If some interventions
seem likely to escalate or inflame the situation, ask as part of the debrief if there are any disadvantages
the group could see from using that particular approach. Also, ask the performers why they chose the
intervention(s) they did and why they thought they would be effective.
3. After each performance, ask the participants if they would really be comfortable enough to carry out the
bystander behavior modeled in the skit. If not, ask them to consider what they would be comfortable
doing. If it isn’t direct engagement, perhaps it is telling a line manager, senior colleague, or human resources
representative.
When all skits have been performed and analyzed, use the following questions to promote analysis and
discussion:
a. How did it feel to come up with these scenarios? Were they easy or hard?
b. Why might someone be afraid to intervene in a situation where sexist behaviors, harassment, bullying, or
violence occur? How do power dynamics factor in?
c. Why might someone feel able to intervene in a situation?
d. What are some ways that we can support ourselves and others to intervene in situations of sexist behaviors,
harassment, bullying, or violence?
e. Who is more likely to intervene in situations? An older man? A younger man? A woman? A person with power? A
person lacking access to decision-making?
f. Why might that be?
CLOSING STATEMENTS: There are safe and constructive ways to prevent and interrupt sexist behaviors,
harassment, bullying, and violence, and these ways differ based on the situation, personal preference, and safety.
While there is no “right” way to prevent or respond to sexist behaviors, harassment, bullying, and violence in every
setting, there are many different options, and if you think creatively, you can almost always find something that
will work.
Always put the needs and interests of the survivor/victim first. Do not take any actions that might compromise their
safety, employment security, and/or might be against their wishes.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: Often when individuals see someone else doing something wrong
or harmful, they react in one of two ways: silence or anger/violence. One of the main goals of this
exercise is to help the participants move beyond this and think—based on their own experience—of
how they can challenge harmful behaviors in ways that are constructive and effective.
Responding with anger and violence often feels emotionally satisfying, but it is almost guaranteed to produce a
negative counter-reaction and possibly even escalate the confrontation.
This exercise encourages participants to think about how to de-escalate the situation as the first step in challenging
the harmful behavior—in ways that respect and prioritize the safety, needs, and interests of victims/survivors.
Pay special attention during the skit for Scenario 3 and 4 of the Participant Handout, for an approach that doesn’t
make things worse for Mary or Beatrice by intervening and possibly putting them at risk of physical harm or losing
their jobs.
NOTES:
SCENARIO 1
You have been at a work party for a few hours when you see your colleague Lucas trying to take Ana back
to his house. Ana is really drunk and has trouble responding to you when you ask her what’s going on.
SCENARIO 2
You and some work colleagues from the same ethnic group are having lunch in the canteen. Your teammate
Abdul, from your ethnic group, is there with his girlfriend, Meena, who is from a different ethnic group. One
of the colleagues you are lunching with starts to hassle Meena, making insulting remarks about her culture,
and a few other colleagues join in. As the scene gets nastier, you feel more and more uncomfortable.
SCENARIO 3
David and Mary are colleagues and were involved romantically. They recently stopped seeing each other, but
David has been calling and texting Mary during work and has cornered her in the corridors to try and get
back together, blaming her for the breakup. Mary has asked him to stop calling and texting. David asks you for
help to try and get Mary back. You are in a quandary as you don’t want to do or say anything that might make
things worse for Mary.
SCENARIO 4
Beatrice has just started her new job as a receptionist. She is young and outgoing and takes pride in turning
up for work looking her best. Many of the men in the office have made comments to each other about how
sexy she looks. One of them, Beatrice’s boss, who is married with children, just recently asked Beatrice to go
out on a date with him. Since then, Beatrice has been withdrawn and quiet. You want to do something but are
aware that by ”making a fuss,” things could backfire, and Beatrice’s boss could use this as a pretext to fire her.
USAID’S
USAID’S ENGENDERING
ENGENDERING |
INDUSTRIES
INDUSTRIES | 173
173
ACTIVITY 8.6 MEN’S ALLYSHIP ROADMAP59
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 45 minutes
KEY MESSAGES: Men’s perceptions of their level of allyship with women exceed women’s experience of that
allyship in practice.
Men can take positive, conscious actions to become better allies to women.
MATERIALS: Photocopies of Equimundo’s Road Map for Men’s Allyship to Advance Gender Equality handout
PREPARATION: Make enough photocopies of Equimundo’s Road Map for Men’s Allyship to Advance Gender
Equality handout.
Familiarize yourself with the Action Points noted in the handout.
PROCEDURE:
1. Form four mixed-gender groups (or, if you prefer, two groups of men and two groups of women). Give
copies of Equimundo’s Road Map for Men’s Allyship to Advance Gender Equality handout to each group
and ask them to go through it together, using the following questions for discussion:
a. Which Actions resonate with you and why?
b. Which do you see often or rarely see? Are there others you would add?
c. Which Actions are most important for your work environment? How could these be implemented?
d. Taking action to enhance men’s allyship:
For men in the groups:
• Which actions can you commit to doing – or doing better or more intentionally – in the immediate future,
and how?
• What do you need from women in the workplace to become better allies?
• What can you do to deal with pushback/resistance from other men (and women) in the organization?
For women in the groups:
• What actions do you need men to commit to doing – or doing better or more intentionally – in the
immediate future, and how?
• How can you, as women, express your allyship to people and groups in the workplace who experience
marginalization or oppression and/or step up for your own rights and visibility?
59 Activity developed using Promundo materials: Male Allyship Study, Men as Allies: Gender Equality at Work and Home. (PPT) and Road Map for Male Allyship to
Advance Gender Equality (Word).
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Highlight the fact that being consistent allies to women within the organization
may entail a break with patriarchal values and practices that can take time and a deep commitment by some
men to break ties of male complicity that uphold privileges and reinforce inequalities.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: When drawing up the action plan, make sure that it is the men in the
group who are taking on most of the responsibility for promoting allyship in the workplace.
NOTES:
1. Listen better. Seek opportunities to hear women’s stories, acknowledge their experiences, and
inform other men.
• Practice active listening, ask questions, and be conscious about not interrupting.
• Educate yourself on how gender inequality intersects with other identities (like race, sexual orientation,
religion, and ability) and forms of oppression. Listen to individuals with different identities from your own
and create space for all.
3. Credit ideas to those who came up with them, especially to female coworkers who are often
overlooked.
• Name names of colleagues who worked on a project or came up with an idea. Emphasize a good idea
when you hear it, and mention it in front of those in charge.
4. Advocate for women’s leadership and equality in the workplace and for pay equality.
5. Speak up when you hear sexist language, and call others out when they use it.
• Step in and make it clear that you don’t support sexist language or jokes. Call it out as sexist (or racist,
homophobic, etc.), and tell them why it’s inappropriate.
6. Learn to be okay with discomfort. Being an ally is about making change, not being comfortable.
• Remind yourself that discomfort in stepping in or speaking up is not greater than the experience of being
harassed or discriminated against.
7. Step up at home. Advocate for work-life balance and paid leave for all caregivers.
• Discuss with your partner what you can do to have an equal partnership at home and create a plan to
remain accountable.
8. Volunteer for nonprofit organizations that do good work and support gender equity.
• Ask friends or look online for local groups that do impactful, intersectional work.
• Women, and particularly women who are members of marginalized communities, are underrepresented
in leadership and political office. Show your support by donating, volunteering, and voting.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 30 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• Understand the difference between healthy and unhealthy communication.
• Begin to identify culture- and workplace-specific communication dynamics.
• Discuss and begin to understand key terms and concepts around workplace conflict and communication.
PREPARATION: Review the activity, and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
Think about, and if possible, discuss with your colleagues, examples of conflicts specific to your workplace and
culture, including both healthy or unhealthy examples and their characteristics. Also, think about and discuss the
gendered dynamics of conflict in your workplace and culture and how expectations of how men and women
engage in conflict may be similar or different.
PROCEDURE:
1. Put up two pieces of flipchart paper. On one page, write at the top “Healthy Communication” and on the
other, write “Unhealthy Communication.”
2. Ask participants to provide examples of conflicts they have seen at work that they would describe as either
healthy or unhealthy and to say what made those conflicts healthy or unhealthy. If participants are focusing
on conflicts that were negative or destructive, encourage them to think about positive examples too.
Examples of healthy and unhealthy characteristics will be culturally and workplace-specific, but examples
might include:
3. After the lists have been made, state: How and whether individuals and groups communicate with each other
plays a large role in determining how healthy and how productive communication is.The goal is not to “win” an
argument or conflict by humiliating others but rather by finding an agreement or resolution favorable to all, or at
least that everyone is comfortable with.That may not be always possible, but it should at least be the goal.
4. Now ask participants: How do gender norms influence the way we communicate and address conflict in our
workplace? How are women supposed to prevent or manage conflict? What about men? Do we have any double
standards in how we expect men and women to deal with conflict?
[The idea behind these questions is to explore workplace cultural norms that may be unequal and unrealistic,
especially for women. For instance, in some cultures, women are expected to be conflict-avoidant, which can
affect their ability to deal with conflict proactively. This can lead to situations where a woman who confronts
a colleague about an issue may be seen as behaving inappropriately and overstepping cultural boundaries,
but a male co-worker who behaves the same way would be seen as assertive and taking charge of a difficult
situation.]
5. Ask the participants: Many of the topics we talked about today in dealing with conflict are related to
interpersonal communication in the workplace. Can anyone make that link clear for me? How can communication
be both the problem and the solution?
6. Tell the participants the following: Conflict is when individuals or groups are aware that they have different
and diverging interests and thus believe that their goals or interests are somehow at odds with each other. In a
workplace, this idea of conflict can take many forms, such as two people competing to lead a project, competition
over finite resources such as staffing or money, different approaches to solving a problem, or disagreement on any
topic. Conflict is often seen as a problem to be avoided, but in reality, conflict is value-neutral. It will always exist
because each person is different, and we all have different perspectives and approaches, and it is only a problem
when it becomes destructive and unhealthy.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Remind participants that they can choose healthy or unhealthy communication.
Conflict may emerge, and it is a natural and unavoidable part of life, and when communication is healthy
and productive, it can be beneficial. But it often veers into unhealthy and destructive. By understanding the
dynamics and learning skills to communicate better, such as we will do in future activities in this unit, we will be
able to prevent some conflicts and ensure others remain healthy and productive, and support our colleagues in
doing the same.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups. In the latter,
some participants will have to play the role of their “opposite” gender.
TIME: 45 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To enable participants to explore further the concept of communication and improve their listening skills.
• To explore ways that women are often not listened to or not empowered to speak.
KEY MESSAGES: To achieve important two-way communication, we must listen actively to what the other
person is saying to us.
There are four essential requirements for active listening:
• Intensity
• Empathy
• Acceptance
• Willingness to focus completely on the discussion.
MATERIALS: Hat or container, index cards/slips of paper (see below), flipchart, photocopies of Participant
Handout 7: Understanding Communication and Active Listening.
PREPARATION:
• Index cards/slips of paper with the following types of listening “responses” written on them
(one per card):
1. An experienced manager criticizes a young female recruit on a technical issue and gives advice that was
not asked for.
2. A male colleague interrupts a female colleague in a meeting and prevents her from finishing her idea/input.
3. A senior manager tries to top a lower-ranked female team member’s contribution with a “better” example.
4. A male engineer appropriates a female colleague’s idea as his own.
5. A female member of staff asks constructive questions to get clarification on what another female colleague
is saying.
6. A male manager puts a female colleague down in front of members of the public.
7. A male engineer compliments a female engineer in a patronizing way.
8. In a meeting, the male chair abruptly changes the subject during a presentation by a female staff member
who had spent days getting the presentation ready.
9. A manager shows understanding and empathy with a female worker who is facing problems of violence at
home.
PROCEDURE:
STEP 1: WHAT IS COMMUNICATION?
1. Begin this activity by telling the group that communication is an important aspect of our lives, and we spend
over 80 percent of our time communicating with others. Effective communication is also an important
element in preventing and resolving conflict.
2. Ask the participants what communication means to them. Allow a few responses and write these on a
flipchart.
3. Summarize key points from their contributions and give a brief description of communication, emphasizing
the following points:
• Communication, at its basic level, is the process whereby a message is transferred from one person to
another or to a group. It is the expression of thoughts and ideas or making known one’s ideas or feelings
about certain issues.
• Two-way communication is when a dialogue ensues between two parties (individuals or groups of
people) that entails both parties speaking and listening to each other’s thoughts, opinions, and beliefs in
a spirit of mutual respect.
• A speaker must try to be as clear as possible with the message they are communicating, and a listener
must show that they are paying attention and will respond in an appropriate and sensitive manner.
• Everyone has experienced how it feels to be talking to someone who doesn’t seem to pay any attention
or is distracted. Explain that this activity will help them to recall those experiences and remember how
they felt during a conversation with a poor listener.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: When breaking into groups, consider groups of men, groups of women,
and mixed-sex groups to bring out the nuances of how listening and communication are played out and
addressed from a gender perspective.
NOTES:
• Verbal: This is the exchange of ideas through spoken or written expression (for example, face-to-face
conversation, phone calls, letters, or singing).
• Non-Verbal: This involves the expression of ideas, thoughts, or feelings without the spoken or written word
(for example, facial expression, gestures, smiles, sign languages, nods, eye contact, foot or toe taps, written
notes or memos, the drumming of fingers).
Elements of Communication
There are six elements that make communication effective:
• Source/Sender
• Message
• Channel
• Receiver
• Effect
• Feedback
Becoming better listeners for many men entails changes in attitudes and behaviors related to the idea of men being
superior and more knowledgeable than women and, therefore, to be listened to!
Even more disruptive is interrupting her/him by saying that you disagree with her/him, but without letting her/him
finish saying what it is that you think you disagree with. That’s a common problem when a discussion gets heated and
it causes the discussion to degrade quickly.
By interrupting the speaker before letting her/him finish, you’re essentially saying that you don’t value what she/he’s
saying. Showing respect to the speaker is a crucial element of good listening.
The “knowing the answer” barrier also causes the listener to pre-judge what the speaker is saying — a kind of
closed-mindedness.
#2 - Trying to be helpful
Another significant barrier to good listening is “trying to be helpful.” Although trying to be helpful may seem
beneficial, it interferes with listening because the listener is thinking about how to solve what he/she perceives
to be the speaker’s problem. Consequently, he/she misses what the speaker is actually saying and ends up being
patronizing.
An old Zen proverb says, “When walking, walk. When eating, eat.” In other words, give your whole attention to
whatever you’re doing. It’s worth emphasizing that the goal of good listening is simply to listen — nothing more
and nothing less. Interrupting the speaker to offer advice disrupts the flow of conversation and impairs the listener’s
ability to understand the speaker’s experience.
Trying to be helpful while listening also implies that you’ve made certain judgments about the speaker. That can raise
emotional barriers to communication, as judgments can mean that the listener doesn’t have complete understanding
or respect for the speaker.
Treating discussion as competition is one of the most serious barriers to good listening. It inhibits the listener greatly
from stretching and seeing a different point of view. It can also be frustrating for the speaker.
Discussion as competition is particularly pertinent to communication between men in cultures within which having
power over other men and being on the winning side (for example, in sports, politics) is valued and linked to feelings
of masculine identity and self-worth.
Psychologists have pointed out that people can understand language about two or three times faster than they
can speak. That implies that a listener has a lot of extra mental “bandwidth” for thinking about other things while
listening. A good listener knows how to use that spare capacity to think about what the speaker is talking about
A listener with an ulterior motive, such as to influence or impress the speaker, will probably use the spare capacity
to think about his/her “next move” in the conversation — his/her rebuttal or what s/he will say next when the
speaker is finished — instead of focusing on understanding the speaker.
Red flag words or expressions trigger an unexpectedly strong association in the listener’s mind, often because
of the listener’s private beliefs or experiences. This can often occur in work settings when women refer to equal
Active listening also involves deconstructing stereotypes, attitudes, and power dynamics determined by gender norms
to develop communicational skills and practices that are based on equal respect and rights for men and women to
speak and be listened to rather than on a paradigm of male superiority-female inferiority.
Four Essential Requirements for Active Listening
Active listening requires the listener to hear the words and identify the feelings associated with the words. We should
be able to understand the speaker from her or his point of view. There are four essential requirements for active
listening:
• Intensity
• Empathy
• Acceptance
• Willingness to focus completely on the discussion.
• Exhibit Affirmative Nods and Appropriate Facial Expressions: The effective listener shows signs of being
interested in what is said through nonverbal signs. Together with good eye contact, non-verbal expressions
convey active listening. Note: These non-verbal signs vary from culture to culture.
• Avoid Distracting Actions or Gestures: Do not look at other people, play with pens or pencils, shuffle
papers, or the like. These activities make the speaker feel like the listener is not interested in what is being said.
• Ask Questions: Questioning helps ensure clarification of what the speaker is saying, facilitates understanding,
and lets the speaker know that the listener is engaged.
• Paraphrase: Paraphrasing means restating what the individual has said in different words. This technique allows
the listener to verify that the message was received correctly. Be careful, however of “mansplaining” – the sexist
practice that some men employ when they use phrases like “what she really meant to say was…,” and which
undermine and often humiliate women.
• Avoid Interrupting the Speaker: Allow the speaker to complete his or her thought before responding, and do
not anticipate what he/she will say.
• Do Not Talk Too Much: Talking is easier than listening intently to someone else. An active listener recognizes
that it is impossible to talk and listen acutely at the same time.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 45 minutes
KEY MESSAGES: When dealing with conflict, talking and being clear and positive in our communications is
essential.
PREPARATION: Review the activity, and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
PROCEDURE:
1. Remind participants about your discussion from Activity 9.1, Healthy and Unhealthy Communication in the
Workplace, and about how important respectful communication is in preventing and resolving conflicts.
2. Ask the participants to break into pairs and ask them to think about a work-related conflict, fight, or
disagreement they feel comfortable discussing and describe that situation to the other person. Ensure that
some of the pairs are single-gender and others mixed-gender.
3. After they both have discussed this, tell them Partner A will play the role of the person with whom Partner
B has the conflict. How would you face him or her? In their roles, allow them some time to talk more about
the conflict.
4. Present the following four phrases:
• “I can see…”: This concerns the conduct we see in another person. For example, “I can see that you
never greet me when…”
• “I imagine…”: Through this phrase, we say what we imagine when observing the other person’s
conduct. For example, “I imagine that you are annoyed.” It is important to note that when we “imagine,”
there is a possibility that we are actually wrong in our interpretation. By expressing what we imagine or
how we interpret something, we provide the other individual the opportunity to clarify.
• “I feel…”: Here, we share our feelings with the person, saying what we can see and imagine. For
example, “I feel sad, and what happened upset me because your friendship is important to me.”
• “I want…”: This is when we make a proposal to improve things. For example, “I want you to tell me if
something is bothering you.”
5. Ask the participants to go back into their pairs and work to resolve the conflict using some of the phrases
presented. When they finish, allow them to discuss in their pairs how they felt doing this exercise.
61 From: : Equimundo-US and University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. 2018. Manhood 2.0: A Curriculum Promoting a Gender-Equitable Future of Manhood.
Washington, DC and Pittsburgh: Promundo and University of Pittsburgh. (Link)
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Use the Key Messages above to close the activity.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: When breaking into pairs, consider pairs of men, pairs of women, and
mixed-sex pairs to bring out the nuances of how conflict is played out and addressed from a gendered
perspective.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 45 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To reflect on some of the positive and negative ways that we react when we are angry or upset
and to practice non-violent ways to react when we are angry or upset to resolve conflict.
PREPARATION: Consider prepping the volunteers who will do the role plays before the activity begins.
Make enough photocopies of the Participant Handout for each participant.
PROCEDURE:
1. If you have completed Activity 9.1, Healthy and Unhealthy Communication in the Workplace, with the
group, remind them about your discussion around healthy and unhealthy conflict and ask them to think
about that discussion as you do this activity.
2. Ask participants, What kind of conflicts, if any, do you observe in the workplace where people become angry or
violent, where the conflict becomes unhealthy and destructive.” After listing a few examples, move on to the
next series of questions.
3. Ask the group the following questions:
(Probe similarities and differences between responses from men and women)
a. What are some of the negative ways of reacting when we are angry/upset?
b. What are some of the positive ways of reacting when we are angry/upset?
c. Where do we learn these ways of reacting when we are angry/upset?
d. Is it easier to control our behavior and reactions with some people compared with others? (For example, at
work compared to at home in the family)
e. How does the way you express your anger or frustration in the workplace differ from the way you express your
anger or frustration outside of work?
4. Now, explain that you are going to do a role-play with two volunteers. Ask two people from the group to
volunteer to play two colleagues from the same team who are disagreeing over something and become
visibly angry with each other. Ask the volunteers to act out the situation where the disagreement escalates,
and one of the colleagues reacts in an impulsive, destructive, or violent way.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Use the key messages above to close the activity.
Conflict always exists but it does not need to be violent or angry and can be an opportunity for personal growth and
development, rather than an opportunity for violence.When we communicate with each other, we can resolve conflict
peacefully and avoid future conflict.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: If possible, prep the volunteers before the activity starts and give them
some time to prepare their role plays.
• Assertive communication: Asking for what you want or saying how you feel in an honest and respectful
way so it does not infringe on another person’s rights or put him or her down.
• Passive communication: Expressing your own needs and feelings so weakly that they will not be heard.
• Aggressive communication: Asking for what you want or saying how you feel in a threatening, sarcastic,
challenging, or humiliating way.
USAID’S
USAID’S ENGENDERING
ENGENDERING INDUSTRIES| | 191
INDUSTRIES 191
ACTIVITY 9.5 MICROAGGRESSIONS
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 30 minutes
OBJECTIVES: To know how to identify microaggressions and address their harmful effects on individuals and
work environments.
KEY MESSAGES: Microaggressions are harmful to workplace productivity and employee mental health.
PREPARATION: Review the activity, and be sure you understand the content, teaching methodology, and timing.
Make enough photocopies of the Participant Handout for each participant..
PROCEDURE:
1. Brainstorm with the participants on their understanding of “microaggressions” and write their responses on
a flipchart. Some (or all) may not be familiar with the term. Depending on their responses, you can share the
definition and examples from Participant Handout 9: Microaggressions.
Microaggressions: the everyday verbal, nonverbal, and environmental slights, snubs, or insults, whether
intentional or unintentional, which communicate hostile, derogatory, or negative messages to target persons
based solely upon their marginalized group membership (American Bar Association, 2019).
2. Form small groups and ask each group to reflect on the following questions:
a. How are microaggressions expressed in their workplace? Give specific examples. By whom and against whom?
b. What are the negative impacts of microaggressions for those on the receiving end? What are the negative effects
on the work environment?
c. From your experience, what are some effective ways to respond to microaggression?
d. How can microaggressions be eradicated from work environments?
3. In the main group, invite the groups to share their reflections and responses.
4. Add any additional information you think might be helpful from Participant Handout 9 to help deepen their
understanding of the damage caused by microaggressions.
5. Ask the participants to propose actions that they and others can take to prevent the use of microaggressions
in the workplace and to respond to them when they do occur.
6. Give participants a copy of Participant Handout 9: Microaggressions.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Remind participants that even though the individual impacts of microaggressions
may be small, the cumulative effect of microaggressions can be significant and very damaging to individuals and
workplaces.
Also note that although individuals who cause harm through microaggressions often do so unintentionally, we are
all responsible for the effects of our words and actions on other people regardless of our motives or intentions.
• Underrepresenting people of different demographic backgrounds in the company’s online and/or public
profile (such as social media, brochures, website).
• Using insults that involve accusing an individual of stereotypically acting like a member of a different social
identity.
USAID’S
USAID’S ENGENDERING
ENGENDERING INDUSTRIES| | 193
INDUSTRIES 193
UNIT 10: Changes,
Commitments
UNIT PURPOSE: This unit contains activities to help participants consolidate commitments
to changes in individual attitudes, behavior, and relations; and plan actions/activities to be
rolled out in the workplace within the context of ongoing gender equality initiatives.
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
OBJECTIVES: To describe what motivates us to make changes in our lives and work environments.
To identify potential obstacles to making changes in our lives and work environments and how to overcome them.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Understanding what motivates us to change can help us to sustain our own process of change and to support
those of others in our lives (partners, family, work colleagues, community).
• Understanding the obstacles to change that we face can help us to address or avoid them and to support our
partners and colleagues to do the same.
• There are many ways to overcome the obstacles to change. But it takes conscious effort.
• We must all work with others to keep supporting and motivating each other.
PREPARATION: Prepare four flipchart papers, two with the word “Motivators – personal life” and “Motivators –
work life” written in big, bold letters across them, and two others with the word “Barriers – personal life” and
“Barriers – work life” written in big, bold letters across them. Hang the personal life flipchart papers in the front
of the room and the work-life papers in the back (or side).
Bring a large stack of cards/A5 paper (enough for each participant to use several).
Cut many pieces of tape and have them available for participants to hang cards on the wall.
PROCEDURE:
Introduction
1. Introduce the activity:
Together, you have experienced a lot of meaningful growth—gaining new knowledge and skills and making
important shifts in your attitudes and behaviors. However, change is not something that happens all at once and
not something that happens quickly. Some things will be harder to change than others. Some changes may take
longer.You might accept some new ideas fully but still be questioning others.You might hold on to some old beliefs.
You might have new beliefs but can’t imagine being able to put them into practice.You might worry about what
others will think of you or how you will feel about yourself. If we understand change as a process in this way, then
we can make genuine commitments and can support each other along the way.
64 Adapted from CARE Rwanda, Indashyikirwa Rwanda, 208–211; Adapted from Michau, The SASA! Activist Kit, 33–35.
Personal reflections
1. Ask participants to reflect upon the following two questions (pause in between them to give participants
time to think).
a. What motivates you in your personal life? (for example, a need to belong, to love/to be loved, to make
a difference)
b. What blocks you (or demotivates you) from making changes in your personal life? (for example, family
pressures, fear of the unknown, economic restrictions, and family commitments)
Note: Only give examples if participants are having difficulty with the questions.
2. Ask participants to continue to reflect. Explain that you will come around with cards and markers and that
each participant should write down their answers on the cards, one response per card. Participants can
work in pairs or groups of three if they wish. (five minutes)
3. After they have written their responses, they should hang them near the respective flipchart paper.
4. Repeat the above steps for “work-life.’
Overcoming barriers
1. Explain: We will now divide into four groups. I will assign two groups to discuss two of the barriers to change in
one’s personal life.The other two groups will discuss two of the barriers to change in one’s work life.
In your groups, you will brainstorm ways of overcoming these barriers. Record your ideas on a flipchart paper.
Each group will have 10 minutes to do this work and three minutes to present.
2. Ask participants to divide into four groups by counting off from 1-4 or any other way.
3. Choose two major barriers from personal life cards and two major barriers from work life cards from those
that the participants shared, and assign two barriers to each respective group (personal life or work life).
Give each group a sheet of flipchart paper and a marker.
4. Circulate between the groups to ensure that they are on the right track. Respectfully challenge groups to be
specific and concrete. Suggest that instead of saying something like “value my partner/colleague,” ask how
they can demonstrate that they value their partner.
5. Alert participants when one minute remains. Call out “Time’s Up!” after 10 minutes have passed.
6. Ask each group to present their ideas for overcoming their barriers. If possible, hold questions until all
groups have presented and discussed.
7. Ask the group how a person’s gender might influence their capacity for overcoming barriers in both
personal and work settings.
8. Ask the participants what the similarities and differences are between the personal life and work-life
motivators and barriers and how they relate to each other. What differences and similarities are there for
men and women?
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Summarize the activity using the key messages above.
FACILITATORS’ NOTES: You can adjust the methodology if you want to prioritize only one of the
domains (i.e., personal life or work life).
Using different colors of cards can make it easier to differentiate between motivators and barriers and between
personal life and work life.
NOTES:
SUGGESTED AUDIENCE: This activity can be used with mixed-gender or single-gender groups.
TIME: 60 minutes
OBJECTIVES:
• To reflect upon specific changes, participants can make to encourage healthy, violence-free workplace
environments.
• To commit individually to making these changes.
KEY MESSAGES:
• Change is a process.
• Each individual has a responsibility to make solid commitments to change their behavior in ways that will
strengthen the work environment.
• We can support each other in positive, helpful ways in putting those changes into practice.
MATERIALS: Flipchart paper, markers, masking tape, Participant Handout 10: Individual Commitment Statement,
and Participant Handout 11: Individual Commitment Plan
PREPARATION: Photocopy the “Participant Handout 10: Individual Commitment Statement and Participant
Handout 11: Individual Commitment Plan. Make enough so each participant receives a copy of each handout.
PROCEDURE:
PART 1: INDIVIDUAL COMMITMENTS EXERCISE
1. Explain: The final step of this training manual is to make commitments to ourselves and to our colleagues that will
strengthen our workplace environment.
2. Hold up the “Individual Commitment Statement” template. Explain that everyone will receive this
“Individual Commitment Statement” to fill out.
3. Explain: For each category, you will come up with at least one specific change that you commit to making. For
some categories, you might commit to more than one change.
4. Provide an example so that participants understand the exercise.
For the category of “Using my power in positive ways,” a manager could commit to promoting respect and
fair treatment of support staff in the office (for example, cleaners or drivers).
5. Explain that they will all have 15 minutes to fill in the form. Although these statements are meant to be
general enough, if they have organization-specific statements they’d like to include, they can add them at
the end of the document (lines 18 and 19, which have been left blank).
6. Ask if there are any questions and answer as needed.
Prioritizing changes
1. Explain: You have identified many important changes to make related to your workplace. It won’t be possible to
change everything all at once.To help ourselves maintain our commitments, we are going to prioritize the changes
we want to see and take them step by step.
2. Explain the next part of the exercise: You will now review the changes that you’ve come up with. You will
choose three changes that you feel are the most important for you to put into practice that you
would like to begin with.You will write these down on the next handout, where it says, “I Will Begin With…” (Hold
up Handout 11: Individual Commitment Plan).
3. Continue: After prioritizing the top three changes, you will identify the next three changes and write
them where it says, “I Will Continue With…” (Point to the corresponding section on Handout 11: Individual
Commitment Plan).
4. Let participants know that they will have five minutes to complete this portion of the activity. Provide a
copy of Participant Handout 11: Individual Commitment Plan to each participant. Ensure that there are no
questions and begin the exercise.
5. Circulate between the participants for support.
6. Keep participants aware of time passing. Call out when there is one minute left and when time is up.
Gather everyone’s attention back to the main group.
CLOSING STATEMENTS: Highlight the common areas between the changes committed to in each of the
groups. Make sure that individuals/groups arrange specific times and places to meet to follow up and carry
through their plans of action.
NOTES:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Get in Motion
Ask group members to stand. Ask them to shake their right arm, then their left arm, then their right leg, and
then their left leg. Now, tell participants that you will count to ten while they shake each limb. They will shake
their right arm ten times, then their left arm ten times, followed by their right leg ten times, and their left leg ten
times—you can count out loud for each limb. As soon as participants have shaken each limb ten times, they go
through the cycle again, but only count to nine. Proceed, counting to eight, then seven, then six, then five, and
so on, until participants only shake each limb once. To make it more exciting, you can count faster and faster as
you go.
The Stomp
Ask everyone to stand in a circle. Teach them a three-count stomp pattern and do it together (for example,
stomp-stomp-clap, stomp-stomp-clap). Then, teach them a four-count pattern (for example, stomp-stomp-
stomp-clap, stomp-stomp-stomp-clap). Divide the participants into two groups. Have one group do the first
pattern and the second group do the second pattern. If there is more time, you can have individuals create their
own patterns for the group to imitate.
The Spaghetti
Have the group stand and form a tight circle, with everyone sticking their hands in the center. Instruct everyone
to use one hand to grab the hand of another person. Then, using the other hand, they should each grab the
hand of someone different. Tell participants that the object of the game is to get untangled without letting
go; by climbing, crawling, and wriggling around, participants can create one large open circle or, sometimes,
two unconnected ones. If they are totally stuck, you can tell them they can choose to undo one link and then
reconnect once that person has turned around, seeing if that works. (Note: This energizer is fun and creates a
nice physical bond between participants. It also subtly communicates ideas of working together to accomplish
a task.)
Men’s engagement program outcomes (four) (Please use a Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, and Time-bound
[SMART] approach for outcomes.)
ORGANIZATIONAL/WORKFORCE DATA
Staff Composition (Please use either total numbers or percentages, but the same logic for all.)
Women Overall % Women on the Women Executive Women Middle Women in
Board % Managers % Managers % Technical Areas %
Men Overall % Men on the Board % Men Executive Men Middle Men in Technical
Managers % Managers % Areas %
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) Analysis (Please mention the three most important
topics for each quadrant of the SWOT analysis.)
Strengths Weaknesses
Opportunities Threats
Communication
Campaigns
Soft Engagement -
social, educational
events
Evaluation
Surveys –
knowledge, skills,
abilities, attitudes
Policy and
Strategic
Framework
Internal
Resourcing and
Knowledge
Sharing
CAPACITY BUILDING
Continued Support DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITIES TIMELINES RESPONSIBILITIES
Needed
Virtual Technical Monthly sessions conducted to provide Once a month after the
Support Sessions the technical support needed to ToT - Basic
implement action plans effectively.
Virtual Refresher Quarterly sessions conducted to Every three months after
Sessions address skill/knowledge gaps identified the ToT or on an as-
during the training rollout. needed basis
In-person ToT - ToT session conducted to equip One year after the ToT-
Advanced facilitators with advanced knowledge Basic and 12 months of
and skills. implementation of the
action plan
3. PARTICIPATION
a. Your assessment of the facilitator(s)’ ability to promote active, qualitative participation (Excellent, Good,
Average, Lacking).
b. What did the facilitator(s) do to promote the “active participation” of the participants in the activity? How do
you rate their level/quality of participation?
c. What more could the facilitator(s) have done to improve the quality of participation?
d. How did the facilitator(s) deal with dominant or disruptive participants?
e. How did the facilitator(s) deal with reserved or shy participants?
4. FACILITATION
a. Your assessment of the facilitator(s)’ facilitation skills (Excellent, Good, Average, Lacking).
b. How would you describe the facilitator(s)’s relationship with the participants during the workshop?
c. What facilitation skills did the facilitator(s) use during the workshop? How well did the facilitator(s)
use them?
d. What other facilitation skills and techniques could the facilitator(s) have used?
5. LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
a. Your assessment of the facilitator(s)’ ability to create/maintain a safe learning environment (Excellent,
Good, Average, Lacking).
b. What did the facilitator(s) do to contribute to a safe, positive learning environment?
c. What else could the facilitator(s) have done to create a safe, positive learning environment?
6. PLANNING/PREPARATION
a. Your assessment of the facilitator(s)’ planning/preparation of the activity.
b. How well do you think the facilitator(s) planned the activity?
c. What else could the facilitator(s) have done during the planning/preparation stage?
7. RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPROVE FUTURE ACTIVITIES:
1. ____________________________________________________________________________________
2. ____________________________________________________________________________________
3. ________________________________________________________________________________________
Unit 5: Power
Activity 5.1: I understand what power K
is and the different types of power
that exist.
Activity 5.2: I understand how gender K
and other social identities influence
how much power people have over
others in society and the workplace.
Activity 5.3: I can identify different S
groups that have different types of
power and how they exercise this
power in the workplace.
Activity 5.4: I am able to reflect A
on my own experiences of power,
powerlessness, and discrimination.
Unit 5: Power
Activity 5.5: I can discuss the S
implications of diverse social
identities and privilege on day-to-
day experiences, including in the
workplace.
Activity 5.6: I can identify dynamics of S
power within relationships, including in
workplace relationships.
Purpose of Survey: To assess shifts in participants’ attitudes that reflect a move toward ideas, opinions, and beliefs
that are gender-equitable.
General information about the participants (and disaggregation categories)
• Anonymous: enables participants to answer candidly
• Age: 18-24; 25-34; 35-44; 45-54; 55 or older
• Gender: Woman; Man; Other; Prefer not to say
• How many people do you manage? 0; 1-3; 4-5; more than 6
For your pre- and post-test survey, choose the statements from the left-hand column that correspond to the units
from which you will draw activities when implementing the training process included in your action plan.
A simple way to use this tool is to create a Google Form for the pretest survey and provide the participants with the
link before the first training session for them to register their responses. For the post-test survey, make a copy of
the pretest survey to create a separate Google form and provide the participants with the link when the final training
session is finished. Alternatively, you can print out the questions for participants to respond to manually and tally the
pre- and post-results later in Excel.
RATINGS
QUESTIONS 1 2 3 4 5
The objectives of Strongly disagree Somewhat Neither agree Somewhat agree Strongly agree
the program at the disagree nor disagree
beginning of today’s
session were clear.
Please rate the Not engaged Somewhat Neither engaged Somewhat Extremely
facilitators’ engagement at all disengaged nor disengaged engaged engaged
in their communication
of the topics.
Please rate the Not clear at all Somewhat Neither clear nor Somewhat clear Extremely clear
facilitators’ clarity in unclear unclear
their communication of
the topics.
I received the answers Strongly disagree Somewhat Neither agree Somewhat agree Strongly agree
and support I needed to disagree nor disagree
understand the material.
I feel confident in Strongly disagree Somewhat Neither agree Somewhat agree Strongly agree
training others on the disagree nor disagree
material covered in the
session today.
1. OVERALL SATISFACTION
• Overall, how satisfied are you with the training sessions? Explain your answer.
• Which of the units or activities did you LIKE MOST and why? (Prompt names of units if necessary.)
• Which of the units or activities did you LIKE LEAST and why? (Prompt names of units if necessary.)
2. FACILITATION
• How satisfied are you with the way the facilitator runs the trainings (facilitation)? Explain your answer.
• What have you LIKED MOST about how the facilitator runs/facilitates the units? Why?
• What have LIKED LEAST about how the facilitator runs/facilitates the units? Why?
3. PARTICIPATION
• How satisfied are you with how the group participates in the trainings? Explain your answer.
• What have you LIKED MOST about how the group participates in the trainings? Why?
• What have LIKED LEAST about how the group participates in the trainings? Why?
4. LEARNINGS/NEW KNOWLEDGE
• How satisfied are you with what you are learning in the trainings (new knowledge)?
Explain your answer.
• How relevant to your life is the new knowledge you have acquired in the trainings?
Explain your answer.
• How relevant to your family life is the new knowledge you have acquired in the trainings?
Explain your answer.
• How relevant to your role at work is the new knowledge you have acquired in the trainings?
Explain your answer.
• How likely are you to apply what you learned in your professional life? Personal life?
• Name three changes you have experienced in the way you think or behave since the trainings started.
• What are the biggest changes you anticipate making in your professional life as a result of the training
received?
• Other comments/reflections.