Recovery Techniques
Recovery Techniques
RF =
Recovery
Efficiency
E ps
* Ed
* Es
*
Ec
A r eal
* V ert ica l Re ser voir
e ner g y
* F acilitie s
* C o mm erc ia l
Recovery Process: Drilling: Infill, Non- Well-work: Offtake Sustain Rate: Reservoir Energy
waterflood, EOR Conventional Wells, management by (Injection, Artificial Lift,
peripheral or in-field pools zones, layers Compression), Facilities
upgrades
Recovery Techniques?
• Natural reservoir energy (primary
recovery)
• Improved recovery methods:
• Pressure maintenance (Gas
injection & Waterflooding)
• Thermal recovery
• Chemical flooding
– Mobility control by adding
polymers to reduce the mobility
of the injected water,
– Interfacial tension (IFT)
reduction by using surfactants,
and/or alkalis.
• Miscible flooding
Incremental Recovery
• A comparison of three methods:
– Surfactant-Polymer (SP)
flooding has the highest
recovery factor relative to
polymer and water flooding.
4
Oil Recovery Process
• Primary recovery:
– The production of
hydrocarbons under the
natural driving mechanisms
present in the reservoir.
• Secondary recovery:
– The additional recovery
resulting from the
conventional methods of Target for different crude oil systems
water injection and
immiscible gas injection. Oil recovery categories
Constant Pressure Displacement
Gas Injection
• Advantages
– Pressure support
– Good sweep if gravity stable
– Fewer injection wells
– Gas “storage” for later use
• Disadvantages
– Gas source required
– Adverse viscosity ratio
– CAPEX & OPEX
Water Injection
• Advantages
– Control well placement
• Disadvantages
– Adequate water source required
– Water quality issues
– Compatibility with formation (e.g., clay swelling)
– CAPEX: facilities, source, wells, etc.
– OPEX: treatment, handling, fuel, etc.
6
Typical Production Performance
• For many fields, especially smaller ones, the plateau phase can be very short, while large fields can stay
several decades at the plateau production level.
Decline
First Oil
Abandonment (EUR)
Discovery
Maximizing The Asset Value
Techniques to identify opportunities:
Well interventions: acid jobs, squeezes, recompletions, re-fracturing jobs
1 2 3 4
Waterflooding has a
Cumulative production
significant rule for
increasing the UR.
Extend field lifetime
Payout time
8
Waterflooding?
• It is a secondary recovery technique of
increasing the oil production.
• Applications:
– Maintain Reservoir Pressure – Pressure
Maintenance
– Supplement Natural Water Influx
– Waterflood dominates processes
– Relatively low cost
– General availability of water
– Ease of application water injection
9
The Right Waterflooding
• It involves optimized design
for ALL project components: Right Volume
– Water injectors (number,
spacing, locations, etc.)
– Water injected (quality,
compatibility, properties).
– Production wells (optimum
production rates, well
monitoring, performance
evaluation).
Right Quality
Right Time
– Production data
(production rates, volume,
ratios)
Right Place
10
How Does a Water Injection Work?
• Inject water on the peripherals on the reservoir.
• The injected water will displace/push oil towards
the producing wells for supporting reservoir
pressure.
• Waterflooding increases oil recovery by 2 Injectors Oil Producers
mechanisms
• Pressure maintenance
• Displacement of oil by water
• Both processes are dynamic displacement processes.
Waterflooding: injection pattern displace oil with
water
• Use injector-producer patterns to sweep oil. FWL
11
Value of Waterflooding
• Carbonate reservoir FDP
12
Recovery Process Decision Tree
• Pressure Maintenance:
– Initiated when reservoir pressure is relatively high
– A dynamic displacement process
– The pressure and saturation history can have a significant impact on the recovery efficiency.
Pressure Maintenance
N Y
14
Waterflooding Development Options
• When making a choice Water injection Waterflooding
between:
– Peripheral water injection
(e.g. Injection wells drilled
near the original OWC)
– Pattern water injection
schemes.
• Controlling factors:
– Well injectivity
– Injector/producer ratio,
– Rate of throughput,
– Sweep efficiency
Peripheral Pattern 15
Waterflood Patterns
Peripheral (at the edge or periphery of the reservoir)
• Advantages: Better areal sweep, increase displacement efficiency,
for partial water drive reservoir, delayed water Breakthrough
• Disadvantage: The response to the water injection is limited to the
producers, delayed field respond
• Uses: in smaller reservoirs or combination with pattern
16
Peripheral vs. Pattern
• Peripheral (bottom up) flood may be preferable:
• Relatively thick reservoirs with good vertical communication
• Reservoirs with high dip
• Water injection near the original OWC
– Supplementation of peripheral injection with infield/pattern injectors may also be required in case of
• Relatively low permeability
• Significant lateral distance between injectors & producers (inadequate support at crestal
producers).
• Pattern water injection is best suited for
• Reservoirs with poor vertical communication (little advantage from oil/water gravity segregation).
– The optimal flood patterns (5-spot, 7-spot, 9-spot patterns, etc.) are a function of:
• Fault patterns
• Areal heterogeneity
• Reservoir anisotropy
• Mobility ratio
17
Water Injection vs. Flooding
• As late as the mid-60’s, Five - spot
Injectors
waterfloods commonly
started as peripheral
floods.
Producers
• This works in fields with
high permeability but is
not a first choice in low-
permeability fields.
• Injector/producer patterns
sweep oil from injectors to
producers more
effectively as they
increase reservoir
Production well
pressure. Injection well
Future inj. well
18
Waterflood Patterns
• Direct Line Drive
• All wells line up in a
rectangular grid system.
Injection
• Staggered Line Drive Well
• Producers are shifted
Production
1/2 pattern from Well
injectors.
No-flow
• The staggered line drive Boundary
has better areal sweep
efficiency than the direct Direct Drive Staggered Drive
line drive.
19
Waterflood Patterns
1 : 1 injector-to-producer ratio
5-Spot Pattern
20
Waterflood Patterns
Irregular spacing
If used, inverted pattern preferred - has more production than injection wells
May be used for pilot floods in normal pattern form because it results in good control of flow during a test
flood
Injection
Well
Production
Well
No-flow
Boundary
Normal Inverted
7-Spot Pattern
21
Peripheral Injection
• Offshore oil filed
• Gulf of Suez, Egypt
6000
3000
H-11
2000
G-9
1000
0
Feb-82 Nov-84 Aug-87 May-90 Jan-93 Oct-95 Jul-98 Apr-01
Date
In-Fill Patterns
• Reasons
• Reservoir complexity
• Lack of lateral pay continuity
1
• Lack of injection support
• Unfavorable injection distribution 2
• Actions
Hesham Mokhtar
Hesham Mokhtar
Hesham Mokhtar
Hesham Mokhtar