S6 Product Market Equlibrium
S6 Product Market Equlibrium
S6 Product Market Equlibrium
1929
1933
Macroeconomics in the Short Run
• Business cycle peak in 1929 and trough in 1933.
Black Thursday, Oct. 24th, 1929 Black Tues Day, Oct. 29th, 1929
• Stocks fall drastically •Stocks plunge again
• Brokers panic •Value of market falls
• GE falls from $400 a share to $283 a •People sell what’s left to get some $
share •By the end of Oct. – over $30
• Brokers make margin calls – no one billion has been lost
can pay •Thousands lose everything
Immediate Effects of the Crash
• Many lost life savings in the market crash
• Banks and Brokers call in loans – American people have no $
• Hundreds of banks close
• No $ to pay back loans = empty savings accounts
• Banks not prepared for people to withdrawal $ at the same time
• No bank insurance
• 9000 banks failed nation wide
• 9 million savings accounts vanish
➢ Unemployment: 25%
➢ Homelessness
➢ Hunger
➢ Psychological depression
➢ More Cooperation
Solutions
• At first, President Hoover favored the
traditional government approach—do little and
wait for things to get better.
• Private charities were responsible for helping
the poor
Hoover’s Attitude
“I do not believe that the power and duty of the general
government ought to be extended to the relief of
individual suffering…though people support the
government, the government should not support the
people.”
--Herbert Hoover, 1930
The Keynesian
Theory
Classical vs Keynesian Economics
Classical Economics(1770-1929) Keynesian Economics(1936 onwards):
• Long run Analysis. • Everything is in short run.
• Output Q: Problem of AS • Output Q: Problem of AD
• Role of Agg Supply in determination of Output and • Role of Aggregate Demand in determination of Output and
Employment
Employment
• P: Prices , Wages and Interest Rate are flexible.
• P:Prices, Wages & Interest Rates are Sticky.
• U: Full Employment
• U: No full Employment
• Assumes perfect competition in both Product (output) • Assumption of perfect competition in both Product (output)
and Factor(Labour) markets and Factor(Labour) markets is unrealistic.
• Says’ law i.e. supply creates it’s own demand, No • Says’ law failed during great depression. AS≠AD always. In fact
fluctuations is output . AS=AD. fall in AD lead to Business cycle ( fluctuation in Output)
• Labour is the only factor of production • Apart from Labour other factor of productions are also
important.
• LRAS is Vertical
• No Role of Govt. • SRAS is Upward sloping
• No Role of Money • Active Role of Govt.
• Active Role of Money.
Keynesian Premises
J.M. Keynes
➢Macroeconomic Equilibrium
1. Product (Goods) Market : AD=AS determines Output and Price
➢ Assumption:
• Keynesian Theory of Income Determination says, “the equilibrium level of national income
and Prices is determined at the level where aggregate demand (AD) for goods and services
equals their aggregate supply (AS)”.
Equilibrium: AD=AS
Price Level
SRASC
Output ( GDP)
a. Aggregate Supply Functions/Curve
• According to Keynesian
theory, in a depressed
economy an increase in
aggregate spending can
increase output without
raising prices.
b. Aggregate Demand of Income Curve
Aggregate Demand(AD): AD=f(P)
• AD is the total spending on goods and services in the economy.
• AD Curve is the total demand curve ( aggregate expenditure) of all economic agent.
• It is negatively related with the price level and hence slope downward from left to right.
AD=Z=C+I+G+(X-M)
P2
Y1 Y2
The Goods Market Equilibrium: AD=AS
with Fixed vs.Flexible Prices
According to Keynes, any change in AD will change Real GDP, thus output is demand determined. Price level doesn’t change
1. The Goods Market
AD=AD=AS Always
Y=Z=Q
Let For Keynes P is fixed
Y = AY= Aggregate (National) Income
Z = AD = Aggregate Expenditures
Through circular flow
Q = AS= Aggregate Output (Money Value)
AD(=AE) Y=E
E2
E1
450
Y1 Y2 AS(=AY)
𝐴𝐷: 𝑍 ≡ 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺 + 𝑋 − 𝑀
• The above identity defines the total demand for goods (Z) as consumption,
plus investment, plus government, plus export, minus imports.
𝑍 ≡ 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺
2. The Demand for Goods
Law: Men or women are disposed, as a rule and on the average, to
a. Consumption (C): 𝐂 = 𝒄𝟎 + 𝒄𝟏 𝒀 increase their consumption as their income increases, but not as much as
0 < c1 < 1 the increase in their income
Let C = 100 + 0.75Y MPC = c1= 0.75 Higher APC signals greater economic activity as consumers are demanding
more goods and services
APC=C/Y
Aggregate
Aggregate Consumption,
Income, Y C APC=C/Y
0 100 0.00
80 160 2.00
100 175 1.75
200 250 1.25
400 400 1.00
600 550 0.92
800 700 0.88
1,000 850 0.85
2. The Demand for Goods: Change in Agg Demand
Round of Income Consumption (C ) Income
Generation Generation
• Let c1 =0.75 i.e. MPC,
• the multiplier would be 4. 1st 100.00
0 100 -100
80 160 -80
100 175 -75
200 250 -50
400 400 0
600 550 50
800 700 100
1,000 850 150
2. The Demand for Goods
b. Investment (𝐼 = 𝐼 ) Planned Investment= 25
Actual Investment: actually how much invested + unplanned inventory changes
a. Consumption (C)
C=C 𝑌
+ 𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜𝐬𝐞
C = c0 + c1 𝑌 Let . C = 100+0.75Y, I=25
So equilibrium Y=500
0 < c1 < 1
b. Investment (Planned) 𝑰 = 𝑰
Since Y= Z
Z=Y= c0 + c1 𝑌 + 𝐼
𝟏
=> 𝒀 = 𝒄 + 𝑰 ……Equilibrium
1 − 𝒄𝟏 𝟎
2. The Demand for Goods
A. Two Sector Model Equilibrium: 𝐴𝐷: 𝑍 ≡ 𝐶 + 𝐼
𝐄𝐱𝐞𝐫𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐞
Let C = 100+0.75Y
a. Consumption (C) I=30+0.2Y
C=C 𝑌 a. If autonomous investment Io increases from 30
+ to 40 .
C = c0 + c1 𝑌 b. Find the equilibrium Y.
0 < c1 < 1
𝐴𝑛𝑠
b. Investment is Induced Investment a)Multiplier =1/(1-0.75-0.2)=20
𝐼 = 𝐼0 + α𝑌 b) dY/dI0=10*20=200
Since Y= Z 0< α <1
Z=Y= c0 + c1 𝑌 + 𝐼0 + α𝑌
𝟏 𝑆 = −𝑐0 + 𝑠1𝑌
=> 𝒀 = 𝒄 +𝐼 ……Equilibrium
1 − 𝒄𝟏 −α 𝟎 0 For Equilibrium: S=I
0<s1<1
𝟏
Super multiplier Necessary condition: c1+ α< 1 or s1> α 𝒀= 𝒄 +𝐼
s1 − α 𝟎 0
2. The Demand for Goods: Exercise
Problem:
A large multinational shipping company , Abhoy Sales Inc. has just decided to spend Rs. 10 cr. on new
storage space in Delhi, Rs.45 cr. on new aircraft and Rs.5 cr. on additional acquisition of kerosene. In addition
to these expenses, the company is producing 5 cr. parcel at a price of Rs 5 per parcel.
Now suppose that Abhoy Sales plans to have a tenth of that production in inventory. Over time , the
company’s parcels have met with increasing demand, but the inventory has only increased by Rs. 1 cr.
Q1. What is this firm total planned investment? Ans: Rs.10 + Rs.45 + 0.1(Rs.5*5 cr.) = Rs.57.5 cr.
Q2. How much did the firm actually invest? Ans: If the inventory increased only by 1 cr., thus the firm
invested 10+45+1=56 cr.
Q3.What is the difference between actual and planned investment? Ans: The difference is 57.5-56=1.5 cr.
the firm should produce more parcels
Q4. Should Abhoy sales produce more or fewer parcels? Why?
to cover the shortage
AS= 5*5 =25 cr.
AD=57.5 cr . As AS<AD the company should produce more parcels
2. The Demand for Goods
B. Three Sector Model Equilibrium: 𝐴𝐷: 𝑍 ≡ 𝐶 + 𝐼 + 𝐺
a. Consumption (C) and Disposable Income (YD) T could be lump-sum tax. A lump sum tax rate is a tax that is the same
value for all who pay the tax. It is the same regardless of income.
C = C YD … . . (1) Ex. Vehicle registration or DL fee. Low-income people are most affected.
+
C = c0 + c1 YD … . (2)
YD=Y-T
C = c0 + c1 Y − T … . (3)
b. Investment (I )
𝐼 = 𝐼 … … (4)
• Autonomous spending is positive because if T = G (balanced budget) and c1is between 0 and 1, then (G – c1T) is
positive, and so is autonomous spending.
• The term 1/(1 – c1) is the multiplier, which is larger when c1 is closer to 1.
• If c1 equals 0.6, the multiplier equals 1/(1 – 0.6) = 2.5, meaning that an increase of consumption by 1 billion will
increase output by 2.5 x 1 billion = 2.5 billion.
3. The Determination of Equilibrium Output: Graphically
Ex. Suppose c0 increases by Rs.1 crore. An increase in autonomous spending has a more than one-for-one effect
on equilibrium output.
AB: first-round increase in production
BC: first-round increase in income
CD: second-round increase in demand
DE: second-round increase in production and
income
The total increase in production after n+1 rounds:
1 + 𝑐1 + 𝑐1 2 +⋅⋅⋅ +𝑐1 𝑛
1/(1−c1).
Ans:
a. Y=1300
b. Substituting G= 125, Y= 1400
c. G=175
3. The Determination of Equilibrium Output: Application
The Lehman Bankruptcy, Fears of Another Great Depression, and Shifts in the
Consumption Function
Figure 2 Google Search Volume for “Great Depression,” January 2008 to September 2009
3. The Determination of Equilibrium Output: Application
The Lehman Bankruptcy, Fears of Another Great Depression, and Shifts in the
Consumption Function
S ≡ YD − C
S ≡Y−T−C
By definition,
• Private saving = Yd-C
• Public saving = T − G.
• National Saving = Private + Public
=>S= I + G − T
−
• Public saving > 0 ֞ Budget surplus
−
• Public saving < 0 ֞ Budget deficit
4. Investment Equals Saving: An Alternative Way of Thinking about Goods—Market Equilibrium
In equilibrium:
𝑌 =𝐶+𝐼+𝐺
Or equivalently 𝐼 = 𝑆 + 𝑇 − 𝐺 … . (10)
Two equivalent ways of stating the condition for equilibrium in the goods market:
(1) Production = Demand
(2) Investment = Saving
4. Investment Equals Saving: An Alternative Way of Thinking about Goods—Market Equilibrium
1
Solve for output: 𝑌= 𝑐0 + 𝐼 + 𝐺 − 𝑐1 T … . . (12)
1 − 𝑐1
– c1
3. Govt Tax Multiplier : ΔY/ ΔT = 1 – c Where Yd=Y-T and T is lump sum tax
1 c1
4. Govt Transfer Payment Multiplier: ΔY/ ΔGTr= 1 − c
1 Where C = C0 + c * (Y-T +GTr)
−c1
5. Govt Income Tax Multiplier: ΔY/ ΔTy=
1 − c1 + c1t
T= T0+t*Y here Ty is Income tax, t is income tax rate
1
6. The Complete Fiscal policy Multiplier: ΔY/ ΔG= 1 − c + c t ∆𝑌 1 ∆𝑌 −c
1 1
∆𝐺
=1–c and ∆𝑇
= 1 – c1
If ΔY/ ΔG- ΔY/ ΔGTr=1, then So ΔY/ ΔG> ΔY/ ΔGTr 1 1
• Disguised unemployment
c. The full value of the multiplier can be achieved only when
there is no change in the MPC during the process of income
propagation. • Low level of capital equipment,
technology
d. Multiplier does not work well in case of leakages from MPC
a. Payments of the past debts • Vast non-monetised sector
b. Purchase of exiting wealth
c. Import of goods and services • Producing for self consumption
e. Does not work well in case of full employment of resources.
References