Week8 Intro
Week8 Intro
Week 8
Module Overview
Dr Özgür Kafalı
Lecturer
[email protected]
Module Team
•Özgür Kafalı [Convenor]
•Seminar Supervisor
2
Outline & Learning Outcomes
•Law and regulation: CMA (Computer Misuse Act),
GDPR (data privacy) and other UK laws regarding
computer systems
•Ethical, privacy and legal issues surrounding social
networks and applications
•Professional responsibilities for developing
applications with data protection in mind
3
How the Module Works
•100% coursework
• A1 Individual Seminar Brief
• A2 Group Wiki
4
Moodle
5
Individual Study and Coursework
•Module focused on reading, research, and
discussion
• Exercises during the lectures
• Seminar discussions led by you
•Lots of reading: every week for seminars
•Follow current affairs: technology news articles
6
Lecture Topics
• Week 9: Computer Misuse Act (CMA)
• Week 10: Ethics (Theory)
• Week 11: Ethics (Practice)
• Week 12: Data Protection (GDPR, US laws)
• Week 13: Data Breaches
• Week 15: Dataset Anonymisation
• Week 16: Privacy (Social Computing)
• Week 17: Privacy (Policies, Notices)
• Week 18: Privacy (Web Computing)
7
Moodle: Weeks
8
Seminars
•9 seminars in total
•Weeks 9-13, 15-18
9
Running of the Seminars
•Everyone carefully reads the seminar material
•Ask questions to lead the discussion
• Moderators for each week (except next week)
• Prepare questions and moderate the discussion
•The seminar supervisor acts as the facilitator:
ensures the discussion flows and that people get a
chance to speak
10
Seminar Topics
• Week 9: Online harms
• Week 10: Contact tracing apps
• Week 11: Morals of autonomous cars
• Week 12: AI, ICO and GDPR
• Week 13: Data breach reports
• Week 15: K-anonymity
• Week 16: Social networks & fake news
• Week 17: Privacy vs consumerism
• Week 18: Deepfake: AI for good?
11
Moodle: Assessments
12
Assessment 1: Seminar Brief
•Set: Week 9 – Monday
•Due: Week 19 – Wednesday
•Short reports (300 words) about 4 selected
seminar topics
13
Seminar Reports
•For each selected topic, a 300-word report:
• 100 words to summarise the provided material for that
week
• 100 words for critical reflection on the provided material
• 100 words for further research
•After the last seminar, submit a merged report
14
Assessment of Seminar Reports
•For each report,
• [0-1] Only summary of provided material; no critical
reflection
• [1-2] Good summary of provided material with critical
reflection
• [2-3] Good summary of provided material with strong
critical reflection; goes beyond the provided material
with further ideas and questions
15
Summary
• General structure:
• Aim, context
• Methodology: e.g. empirical experiments, AI, or other
computational method
• Significant results
• No need to cite (or repeat the names of) provided papers
• Common: don’t use any direct quotes from the material,
instead always use your own words to rephrase
16
Critical Reflection
• Don’t repeat their results
• Either:
• Describe one limitation and your proposed solution (don't use one of
theirs), or
• One good aspect and why you think that is good (not their justification)
• Common: focus only on a limitation, but not provide a solution
• “They focused on X, where more things could be done“
• Give an example of those "more things"
17
Further reading
• Structure similar to critical reflection
• What did you learn new that was not in the provided material?
• How does it connect to the topic?
• If you only provide a citation and write one sentence, you
won't get any marks
• There is a reason the whole report is divided into three
equal parts
• Common: forget to cite the additional material
18
Assessment 2: Group Wiki
• Set: Week 13 – Monday
• Due: Week 18 – Monday
• Group work: you can form your own group
• 4-5 people from the same seminar group
• Topic selection:
• List will appear on Moodle (before Week 13)
• Give three preferences for your group
• Same topic cannot be picked by multiple groups
• Good practice to check each others’ contributions
19
Wiki Content
•A narrative of the case study (or case studies)
•An analysis with potential computing, ethics,
privacy, and legal implications (both positive and
negative)
•Questions for further thought (some hints about
how to address them)
•References (academic papers, news articles, etc)
20