Development of Instructional Material in Patterns and Algebra Based On The Least Learned Competencies
Development of Instructional Material in Patterns and Algebra Based On The Least Learned Competencies
Keywords: instructional materials, patterns and algebra, least learned competencies, grade 8 students
Algebra as a tool in problem solving suggests the for carefully planned programs of exchange in the
effectiveness of using Algebra as a tool in problem curriculum.
solving to be able to arrive at the correct answer and to
facilitate their solution to the problem. Furthermore, Andres and Francisco (2008) suggested
that there must be an examination of the place of
Students' Performance in Patterns and Algebra formative process and summative evaluation of
curriculum programs and of the practical materials for
According to the Ph ilipp ine Institute for the actual process of installing new curricula in
Developmental Studies (2012), education plays an schools.
important role to every individual because it equips
him/her with the necessary knowledge and skills As presented by Biggs (2003), the implementation of
needed to become a functional member of the society. the curriculum should follow the Principle of
According to the World Bank, education can also be Alignment. It describes teaching as a balanced system
one of the strongest instruments for reducing poverty, in which all components support each other, as they do
thereupon improving the well-being of the people. in any ecosystem. To work properly, the three
However, to establish and maintain a high-quality components, namely Objectives, Instruction, and
education system, proper investments must be made Assessment, must be aligned with each other. In
(Philippine Institute for Developmental Studies, 2012). aligned teaching, there is maximum consistency
More so, there is a need to highlight the competence of throughout the system. The objectives must be clearly
students in subjects that prepares them for the world, stated in a manner that the level of understanding is
including Mathematics. Mathematics is one subject properly defined and not simply a list of topics to be
that pervades life at any age and in any circumstance. covered.
Thus, its value goes beyond the classroom and the
school. Algebra as a subject is offered to first year high school
as basic subject in mathematics. This subject serves as
Mathematics as a school subject, therefore, must be the basic foundation in solving problems in other
learned comprehensively and with much depth m ath em atics sub jects like Geo metry and
(Department of Education, 2013). The achievement Trigonometry. This subject makes use of symbols,
scores, whether in local or international examinations, usually letters of the alphabet, to represent numbers or
are means to measure comprehension on different quantities and express general relationships that hold
subject areas and highlight students’ over-all academic for all members of a specified set. If Algebra is used as
performance. The National Achievement Test (NAT) a tool in problem–solving in high school, it can also be
results for grade 6 in SY 2009-2010 showed only a made possible in the elementary. It is for this reason
69.21% passing rate while the NAT results for high that the present researcher prepared an instructional
school is at a low 46.38%. Moreover, in international material covering the most difficult area in
test results such as the 2003 TIMSS (Trends in mathematics coupled with the use of Algebra as a tool
International Mathematics and Science Study), the in problem–solving.
Philippines ranked 34th out of 38 countries in HS II
Math and ranked 43rd out of 46 countries in HS II Based on the findings of the study conducted by
Science; for grade 4, the Philippines ranked 23rd out Capate (2015), the researcher derived the following
of 25 participating countries in both Math and Science. conclusions: (1) The results of the formative tests and
the Mathematics Achievement Test (MAT) showed
In 2008, even with only the science high schools that students’ achievement is in the Beginning and in
participating in the Advanced Mathematics category, the Developing level for the three content areas of the
the Philippines ranked lowest (Department of Grade 8 Mathematics curriculum. These imply that
Education, 2010). As part of the efforts of the they struggle with their understanding or possess only
government to respond to the perceived needs of the the minimum knowledge and skills and core
education sector, the Department of Education understandings; pre-requisite and fundamental
(DepEd) had pushed for the change in the basic knowledge and/or skills have not been acquired or
education curriculum—the implementation of the developed adequately to aid understanding. (2) Most
“Enhanced K to 12 Basic Education Program”. Truly, of the least-mastered contents of the Mathematics
in the Philippine context, education remains a top Achievement Test were because of the non-alignment
priority. However, in implementing academic between the Objectives and the Instruction. There was
curricular changes specifically in Mathematics, many an imbalance in the system that led to poor surface
factors need to be considered. For one, there is a need learning. The non-alignment signified inconsistencies,
unmet expectations, and practices that contradict what Analyze phase to plan a strategy for developing the
is preached. (3) In terms of the nature of assessment, instruction. During this phase, you must outline how to
test items’ distractor which was answered more than reach the instructional goals determined during the
the correct answer shows only that these are good Analyze phase and expand the instructional
distractors. However, many students were answering foundation. Some of the elements of the Design Phase
an incorrect distractor. It only reflects that they are not may include writing a target population description,
critical problem solvers to be able discern the correct conducting a learning analysis, writing objectives and
answer. Furthermore, the root cause of misconceptions test items, selecting a delivery system, and sequencing
is retention of skills learned during instruction. the instruction. The outputs of the Design phase will
be the inputs for the Develop phase.
The findings of the study conducted by Doroliat and
Labo (2018) revealed that the computed performance The Develop phase builds on both the Analyze and
level of the grade 8 learners in the post-test is 33.6%
Design phases. The purpose of this phase is to generate
and interpreted as low performance and did not meet
the lesson plans and lesson materials. During this
the expectation of Department of Education.
phase you will develop the instruction, all media that
Researchers recommended that Strategic Intervention
will be used in the instruction, and any supporting
Materials may not only focused on unlocking
documentation. This may include hardware (e.g.,
difficulties but also provide more activities during and
simulation equipment) and software (e.g., computer-
after the mathematical problems. Activities that will
based instruction).
help the learners master the prerequisites in
mathematical problems like the fundamental
The Implementation phase refers to the actual delivery
operations, graphical presentations and mathematical
of the instruction, whether it's classroom-based, lab-
application using numerical expressions and the like is
based, or computer-based. The purpose of this phase is
provided.
the effective and efficient delivery of instruction. This
ADDIE Model phase must promote the students' understanding of
material, support the students' mastery of objectives,
Instructional design aims for a learner-centered rather and ensure the students' transfer of knowledge from
than the traditional teacher-centered approach to the instructional setting to the job.
instruction, so that effective learning can take place.
This means that every component of the instruction is This phase measures the effectiveness and efficiency
governed by the learning outcomes, which have been of the instruction. Evaluation should actually occur
determined after a thorough analysis of the learners’ throughout the entire instructional design process -
needs. within phases, between phases, and after
implementation. Evaluation may be Formative or
According to McGriff (2000), the ADDIE Model is an Summative. Arnilla (2022) used ADDIE model in
iterative instructional design process, where the results developing print-based storybook in the mother tongue
of the formative evaluation of each phase may lead the for teaching COVID-19 prevention in the Philippines.
instructional designer back to any previous phase. The Result shows that the ADDIE model can be used to
end product of one phase is the starting product of the guide the creation of health literacy material suited for
next phase. ADDIE is orderly since it builds up young children. Nabayra (2018) developed an e-
guidelines and systems, and also the convention for module as a tool for flipped classroom by utilizing
setting up the principles and methodology and ADDIE model. As its result, the e-module has
constitutes dependable ways to deal with planning excellently met the standards and no major revision is
direction, Alnajdi (2018). needed as reflected in the evaluation by the experts
and the students. Furthermore, Alnajdi (2018)
The Analyze phase is the foundation for all other
conducted a study on the effectiveness of designing
phases of instructional design. During this phase, you
and using a practical interactive lesson based on
must define the problem, identify the source of the
ADDIE model to enhance students’ learning
problem and determine possible solutions. The phase
may include specific research techniques such as needs performances. Result shows that students’
analysis, job analysis and task analysis. The outputs of performances had been effective positively based on
this phase often include the instructional goals, and a used a well-designed practical interactive lesson.
list of tasks to be instructed. Based on the experts’ reviews in this study, ADDIE
models are flexible and build effective training and,
The Design phase involves using the outputs from the subsequently, the performance of students.
interventions, and the evaluation and reflection on the competencies in Patterns and Algebra, focus group
implementation for enhancement and revisions. discussion guide, Quality Assurance tools of learning
resources, and performance in Patterns and Algebra.
Participants
Checklist on least learned competencies in Patterns
The development and evaluation of the instructional and Algebra. The researcher used a researcher-made
materials were based on the data collected from the checklist (see Appendix B.1) to identify the least
participants of the study. learned competencies in Patterns and Algebra based
from the MELCs released by DepEd to be used for
Students. The students of this study are the two school year 2020 – 2021. This research instrument was
hundred fifteen (215) grade 8 students of Bacan composed of 18 competencies with corresponding sub-
National High School in the district of Banga enrolled competencies and was utilized by nine (9) Grade 8
during the School Year 2021-2022 participated during Mathematics teachers of the Department of Education
the implementation of instructional material. Nine (9) in the division of Aklan. The checklist was subjected
of them participated during the online class and used for content and face validation by the experts to attain
Google Meet as the online classroom. They gave an acceptable degree of validity. They are composed
comments and suggestions for further improvement. of Mathematics Coordinator, English Coordinator,
Their test results were utilized to identify their Information and Communication Technology
performance in Patterns and Algebra before and after Coordinator, and a Guidance Counselor Designate.
the utilization of the module. Their suggestions, recommendations and comments
were used for the revision of the questionnaire. The
Teachers. To identify the least learned competencies, revised version was submitted to the research adviser
the researcher gave a researcher-made checklist and for further correction and suggestion.
focus group discussion guide to nine (9) grade 8
Mathematics teachers of the Department of Education Focus Group Discussion Guide. The focus group
in the division of Aklan. These teachers were chosen discussion guide (see Appendix B.2) was used to
by purposive sampling. The researcher identified them validate the identified least learned competencies of
by asking for the list of Mathematics teachers from the Grade 8 students in Patterns and Algebra. It was
District Mathematics Coordinators in the Division of composed of open-ended guide questions and was
Aklan and asking these teachers one-by-one if they utilized by the teachers during the one-shot focus
had free time and were willing to participate in the group discussion. The questions were divided into two
study. They identified the least learned competencies parts: (1) Establishing Rapport and (2) Experiences in
in Patterns and Algebra based on their students' record teaching Patterns and Algebra. Four (4) experts
for the school year 2019-2020 which includes written validated the content and face validity for
works and performance tasks. Likewise, they were appropriateness of the questions included. Their
interviewed through focus group discussion to validate suggestions, recommendations and comments were
the results. used for the revision of the questionnaire. The revised
version was submitted to the research adviser for
Experts. For the evaluation of the developed further correction and suggestion.
instructional materials, four (4) School Mathematics
Coordinators, three (3) Mathematics teachers, one (1) DepEd Evaluation Tool for Learning Resources. To
School English Coordinator, and one (1) School validate the acceptability of instructional materials,
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) DepEd Evaluation Tool for Learning Resources (see
Coordinator of the Department of Education in the Appendix B.3) was utilized. This was composed of
division of Aklan were the experts. The experts three evaluation tools: (1) content, (2) language, and
validated the acceptability of instructional materials (3) layout and format. The researcher visited four (4)
using the DepEd’s Quality Assurance tools for DepEd- School Mathematics Coordinators, three (3)
developed Learning Resources. They indicated Mathematics teachers, one (1) School English
minimal revisions and recommendations for the Coordinator, and one (1) School Information and
improvement of instructional materials. Communication Technology (ICT) Coordinator of the
Department of Education in the division of Aklan.
Instruments of the Study These experts evaluated the developed instructional
materials through the Quality Assurance tools for
For the purpose of this study, the researcher used Learning Resources. To determine if the instructional
researcher-made checklist on least learned material is acceptable, compliance to each criterion
must be achieved. In terms of content, there should be involved in the research endeavor in the conduct the
a 75% compliance in intellectual property rights, 100% study. In this study, all health protocols set by the
compliance in learning competencies, 71% compliance authorities were strictly complied. According to the
in instructional design and organization of material, Omnibus Guidelines through its 43rd resolution,
60% compliance in instructional quality, 71% released by the National Corona Virus Task Force of
compliance in assessment, 60% compliance in the Philippines last May 15, 2020, even under the most
presentation and organization, and 57% compliance in relaxed form of community quarantine, the children
the teacher’s support material. In terms of language, were not allowed to go out of their homes. The
there should be a 78% compliance in coherence and researcher followed the minimum public health
clarity of thought, 71% compliance in grammar and standards released by Inter – Agency Tasked Force
syntax, 67% compliance in spelling and punctuation, (IATF) stated in DepEd’s Basic Education Continuity
60% compliance in consistency in style, and 75% Plan to secure respondents’ safety. The required health
compliance in translation (for contextualized LRS). In standards involved following social distancing
terms of layout and format, there should be an 83% measures, wearing face mask and practicing proper
compliance in physical attributes, 71% compliance in hygiene consistent with the IATF health protocols,
book layout and design, 60% compliance in DOH health standards, local and national quarantine
typographical organization, and 23% compliance in rules and all other relevant protocols.
visuals.
The data for this study were gathered through the
Performance in Patterns and Algebra. To determine Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation,
the performance of the students in Patterns and Evaluation (ADDIE) model.
Algebra before and after the utilization of the module,
a 15-item multiple choice pre-test and post-test were Analysis. After the approval of the study, the
used. These were validated together with the self- researcher-made checklist and focus group discussion
learning modules and were pilot tested to a group of were conducted with nine (9) grade 8 Mathematics
students not part of the respondents. The results in the teachers for the identification of the least learned
pilot testing were used for reliability test using KR-21 competencies of Grade 8 students in Patterns and
and results revealed a coefficient of 0.79 which shows Algebra through Google form and Focal Group
that tests were reliable. Discussion. The Focus Group Discussion was
conducted on February 13, 2022 using Google meet as
Below is the scale to determine the passing or failing online conference room.
rate of the test.
Design and Development. The result of least learned
Table 1. Passing and Failing Rate of Pretest and competencies based on the most essential learning
Posttest competencies were the basis in developing
instructional materials. The researcher developed self-
learning modules as appropriate learning materials on
the five least learned competencies in Patterns and
Algebra for grade 8. Further, the materials followed
the format released by the Department of Education
Figure 1. .
Learning Resources Management and Development
System (LRMDS) which includes a title page,
copyright page, introduction, learning objectives,
Procedure discussion, assessment, additional activities, answer
key, and references. The development was based on
To start the study, the researcher prepared the needed the format constructed in the design stage.
letters to make the study legal. The researcher sent a
letter to the Schools Division Superintendent of the Implementation. The researcher conducted a one-
Department of Education Division of Aklan through week modular and online implementation of the
its research department to ask permission to conduct a researcher-developed instructional materials. One of
study. After, the researcher then sought for the the five modules was distributed to nine (9) Grade 8
approval of the Public Schools District Supervisor of students of Bacan National High School in the district
the district of Banga, whose teachers were involved in of Banga enrolled during the School Year 2021-2022.
the conduct of the study, and School Principal of An online class was conducted using Google Meet as
Bacan National High School, whose students are the online classroom. First, the researcher introduced
module. The mean score before the utilization of teachers composed of four (4) School Mathematics
module was 8.77. This is lower than the passing mean Coordinators, three (3) Mathematics teachers, one (1)
rate of 11.25 or 75% of the 15-item pre-test. After the School English Coordinator, and one (1) School
utilization of the module, mean score is 12.34, which Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
means that students passed the post-test. It showed a Coordinator of the Department of Education in the
mean difference of 3.57, z-value of -7.713 and p-value division of Aklan. Frequency, percentage and mean
of 0.000. Since the P-value is lesser than the level of were used to analyze the result in the evaluation stage.
significance which is 0.05, this indicates to reject the
null hypothesis. Therefore, there is a significant Results on the pre-test and post-test of students were
difference in the performance of the students before used to determine the performance of students in
and after the use of module. This means that students' Patterns and Algebra. The study has found statistically
academic performance in Mathematics were observed significant differences between the results before and
to have significant improvements after the utilization after the use of module developed based on the
of module. This further indicates that the module if learning styles and least learned competencies of
effective in increasing/improving the performance of students in Patterns and Algebra. The students'
the students in Patterns and Algebra. academic performance in Mathematics were observed
to have improvements after the utilization of module.
Table 5. Difference in the Performance of the Students
Before and After the Use of Module
Conclusion
Center of S cienc e and Educ a t ion . Ret riev ed from Mathematics of Grade V Pupils. Master’s Thesis, Bicol University,
https://doi.org/10.5539/ jel.v7n6p212 Legazpi City, Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/.
Aramo-Immonen H. (2013) Mixed Methods Research Design. Lytras M.D., Ruan D., Tennyson R.D., Ordonez De Pablos P.,
Retrieved on July 1, 2020. García Peñalvo F.J., Rusu L. (2011). Information Systems, E-
learning, and Knowledge Management Research. Retrieved June 23,
Aranda, M. R. R., & Zamora, J. L. (2006). Using differentiated 2020.
instruction in improving the academic performance of students in Malasa, I. M. (2001). Learning Difficulties of Students in Algebra
Filipino language, 12 pages. Retrieved June 23, 2020. and Remediation Strategies. Master’s Thesis, Bicol University,
Legazpi City, Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/.
Arnilla, A.K. (2022). Print-based storybook in the mother tongue for
teaching COVID-19 prevention in the Philippines. Cypriot Journal McGriff, S. (2000). ADDIE Model. Instructional Systems, College
of Educational Science. 17(8), 2799-2810. Retrived from of Education, Penn State University. Retrieved from
https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v17i8.738 http://www.seas.gwu.edu/~sbraxton /ISD/general_phases.htm
B. Adonis, A. (2020). Contextualized Strategic Intervention Nel, N. & Nel, M. (2013). Learner support in a diverse classroom: A
Materials in Grade 9 Mathematics. PEOPLE: International Journal guide for foundation, intermediate and senior phase teachers of
of Social Sciences, 5(3), 850–868. Language and Mathematics. Pretoria, South Africa.
Bañas, E. (2007). Development of Instructional Materials in Noble, H., & Heale R.(2019). Triangulation in Research. Evidence-
Mathematics III – VI for Sunshine International School. Master’s Based Nursing. doi:10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103145. Retrieved from
Thesis, Bicol University, Legazpi City, Philippines. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net
http://www.ijern.com/. /publication/333794057_Triangulation_in_research_with_examples
on June 15, 2022
Cabrillas, Z. C. (2010). Effectiveness of Afterclass Mathematics
Intervention Program in Enhancing Problem–solving Skills of Omnibus Guidelines on the Implementation of Community
Students. Doctoral Dissertation, Bicol University, Legazpi City, Quarantine in the Philippines. (2020, June 3). Retrieved from
Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/ downloads/2020/06jun/
20200603-omnibus-guidelines-on-the implementation-of-
Creswell, J. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and community-quarantine-in-the-philippines.pdf on June 11, 2020.
evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4thed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Retrieved on July 1, 2020. Reyes, Janice L. (2012). An Exploration of Eighth-Grade Students’
Experience of Algebra. Retrieved from
Department of Education - Bacan National High School (2020). https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/etd/789 on July 1, 2020.
School Learning Action Cell (SLAC) ID Number 01. Bacan
National High School, Bacan, Banga, Aklan. Sanlad, L. (2020). Comprehensive Analysis on Least Learned
C o mp e te nc i e s in Ma th e m ati c s 5. Re trieved from
Department of Education (2010). Discussion paper on the enhanced https://www.grin.com/ document/535597.
K to 12 education program. CEAP. Pasig City. Retrieved from
https://swedta.files.wordpress.com/ 2011/09/k12new.pdf Santos, J. T. D., Lim, R. R., & Rogayan, D. V. Jr. (2021). Least
mastered competencies in biology: Basis for instructional
Department of Education (2019). Policy Guidelines on K to 12 Basic intervention. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2),
E duca tion Program. Re trieved fro m 208-221. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i3.
https://www.deped.gov.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2019/08/DO_s
2019_021.pdf on June 11, 2020. Torio, M. (2015). Development of Instructional Material Using
Algebra as a Tool in Problem Solving. International Journal of
Doroliat, J. & Labo, A. (2020). Performance Level, Least-learned Education and Research. Philippine Normal University, Taft
Competency and Misconception on Linear Equation and Avenue, Manila, Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.ijern.com/.
Inequalities. International Journal of Science and Research.
Retrieved from
https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v9i7/SR20706115116.pdf. Affiliations and Corresponding Information
Fajardo, M. G. (1977). Performance and Strategies Employed y Jeanny Bhie A. Gari
Third Year Students in Gubat National high School in the Solution Bacan National High School
of Routine and Non–routine Problems in Mathematics” Bicol Department of Education – Philippines
University Legazpi City, Philippines. Retrieved from
http://www.ijern.com/. Manuel Malonisio
Aklan State University – Philippines
Ford, C., McNally, D. & Ford, K. (2017). Using design-based
research in higher education innovation. Online Learning, 21(3),
50-67. doi: 10.24059/olj.v% vi%i.1232. Retrieved from
https://files.eric.ed.gov/ fulltext/EJ1154158.pdf on June 25, 2020.