Scribd
Upload
56 views2 pages

Flotation Test 10.7.23

This document summarizes the results of a flotation test conducted on July 10th. The test examined portions of material (C1-C6) and calculated the copper and arsenic content. It found that copper recovery was very good at over 90%, but the percentage reporting to tails was slightly higher than expected. In conclusion, oxide recovery was very good, but the percentage of material reporting to tails was slightly higher than anticipated.

Uploaded by

Jerry Tshimona
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
56 views2 pages

Flotation Test 10.7.23

This document summarizes the results of a flotation test conducted on July 10th. The test examined portions of material (C1-C6) and calculated the copper and arsenic content. It found that copper recovery was very good at over 90%, but the percentage reporting to tails was slightly higher than expected. In conclusion, oxide recovery was very good, but the percentage of material reporting to tails was slightly higher than anticipated.

Uploaded by

Jerry Tshimona
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Flotation Test of Monday, 10th July 23

Test 1 Weight Cu Tot AS Cu


Mass Rec
Portion g %Cu g Rec (%) %Cu g
(%)
C1 35.64 3.41 67.66 24.11 47.89 1.38 0.49
C2 38.01 3.64 37.78 14.36 28.52 1.48 0.56
CC1 73.65 7.05 52.24 38.47 76.41 1.43 1.05
C3 50.25 4.81 6.20 3.12 6.19 3.57 1.79
Rougher 1 123.90 11.85 33.57 41.59 82.60 2.30 2.85
C4 75.48 7.22 5.86 4.42 8.78 1.20 0.90
CC2 199.38 19.07 23.08 46.01 91.38 1.88 3.75
C5 88.24 8.44 1.22 1.08 2.14 0.66 0.58
CC3 287.62 27.52 16.37 47.09 93.52 1.51 4.33
C6 121.48 11.62 0.59 0.72 1.42 0.40 0.48
Rougher 2 285.20 27.29 2.18 6.22 12.35 0.69 1.96
Rougher Tot 409.10 39.14 11.69 47.81 94.95 1.18 4.81
Tails 636.16 60.86 0.40 2.54 5.05 0.19 1.19
Feed 1045.26 100.00 4.82 50.35 100.00 0.57 6.00

Conclusion

Following this test, we find that Oxide Recovery's very good; but %Tails's littletly higher
AS Cu Cu Sulph

Rec (%) %Cu g Rec (%)

8.20 66.28 23.62 53.26 Weight yield


9.34 36.31 13.80 31.11 39.14
17.54 50.81 37.42 84.38
29.90 2.63 1.32 2.98 Total recovery efficiency
47.44 31.27 38.74 87.36 94.95
15.05 4.66 3.52 7.94
62.48 21.20 42.26 95.29 Oxide Ratio in Feed
9.69 0.56 0.50 1.12 12
72.18 14.87 42.76 96.41 Concentration rate
8.00 0.19 0.24 0.53 2.43
32.73 1.49 4.25 9.59
80.17 10.51 43.00 96.94 Oxide Recovery efficiency
19.83 0.21 1.36 3.06 80.17
100.00 4.24 44.35 100.00

y higher

You might also like