Poor Students, Richer Teaching Mindsets That Raise Student Achievement The Science Behind Students Emotional States (Eric Jensen)
Poor Students, Richer Teaching Mindsets That Raise Student Achievement The Science Behind Students Emotional States (Eric Jensen)
Poor Students, Richer Teaching Mindsets That Raise Student Achievement The Science Behind Students Emotional States (Eric Jensen)
STUDENTS,
RICHER
TEACHING
ERIC JENSEN
Copyright © 2017 by Solution Tree Press
Materials appearing here are copyrighted. With one exception, all rights are reserved. Readers may
reproduce only those pages marked “Reproducible.” Otherwise, no part of this book may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, recording, or
otherwise) without prior written permission of the publisher.
555 North Morton Street
Bloomington, IN 47404
800.733.6786 (toll free) / 812.336.7700
FAX: 812.336.7790
email: [email protected]
SolutionTree.com
Visit go.SolutionTree.com/instruction to download the free reproducibles in this book.
Printed in the United States of America
20 19 18 17 16 1 2 3 4 5
Solution Tree
Jeffrey C. Jones, CEO
Edmund M. Ackerman, President
Solution Tree Press
President: Douglas M. Rife
Editorial Director: Tonya Maddox Cupp
Managing Production Editor: Caroline Weiss
Senior Editor: Amy Rubenstein
Copy Chief: Sarah Payne-Mills
Copy Editor: Miranda Addonizio
Proofreader: Elisabeth Abrams
Text and Cover Designer: Abigail Bowen
Editorial Assistant: Jessi Finn
Acknowledgments
Jeff Dillon
Superintendent and Elementary Principal
Wilder School District
Wilder, Idaho
Kristine Humer
Reading Resource
Mark Sheridan Math and Science Academy
Chicago, Illinois
Susan Kessler
Executive Principal
Hunters Lane High School
Nashville, Tennessee
Samuel Lehman
Fifth-Grade Teacher
Terence C. Reilly School No. 7
Elizabeth, New Jersey
Carol Null
Kindergarten Teacher
Pemetic Elementary School
Southwest Harbor, Maine
Visit go.SolutionTree.com/instruction to download the free
reproducibles in this book.
Table of Contents
PART ONE
WHY THE POSITIVITY MINDSET?
2 Secrets of the Positivity Mindset
PART TWO
WHY THE ENRICHMENT MINDSET?
8 Secrets of the Enrichment Mindset
9 Manage the Cognitive Load
10 Develop Better Thinking Skills
11 Enhance Study Skills and Vocabulary
12 Build Better Memory
13 Lock in the Enrichment Mindset
PART THREE
WHY THE GRADUATION MINDSET?
14 Secrets of the Graduation Mindset
15 Support Alternative Solutions
16 Prepare for College and Careers
17 Lock in the Graduation Mindset
Appendix A: Rich Lesson Planning
Appendix B: Running Your Own Brain
References and Resources
Index
About the Author
The title of this book, Poor Students, Richer Teaching, suggests a rich and
poor dichotomy. But it is also about something that many poor students are
not getting: richer teaching. Here, the word richer means full, bountiful,
and better than ever. Teachers can make a difference in students’ lives with
richer teaching. They can ensure all students, regardless of background,
graduate college and career ready.
You have seen many changes in the United States in your lifetime. In this
chapter, you’ll discover the new normal. We typically say something is
normal meaning it’s just fine and pay less attention because we often take it
for granted. We also say things are normal as if that is a good thing. But
now I invite you to see the new normal as a threat to your job and your
future. Poverty and mindsets (the topics of this book) play a big part of this
new normal. No, this is no doomsday scenario. It is about what has already
happened. You must know about this before you walk into your classroom
again.
Let me summarize this for you. From 2000 to 2014, the share of adults
living in middle-income households fell in 203 of the 229 U.S. metropolitan
areas. Think about that; in almost 90 percent of the United States’ metro
areas, the middle class is shrinking (Pew Research Center, 2016).
Fifty-seven cities and municipalities have filed for bankruptcy since
2010 (Governing, 2015). The United States has borrowed too much, and we
already owe more than we can ever repay. The government is unlikely to fix
it itself; there is no precedent in world history of any country ever climbing
out of debt as deep as ours. Poverty is here to stay, and it is getting worse.
Wrap your head around this new normal. This is not temporary; all U.S.
residents are at risk.
Quick Consolidation
The new normal is here. Poverty is increasing; it is not a temporary
downtick in the U.S. economy. Things are getting worse, not better. The
new normal means you’ll be seeing more and more students from poverty.
It also means that we’ll collectively have to boost graduation rates of those
from poverty.
When students don’t graduate, they are more likely to end up in the
juvenile justice track, require food benefits, or become unemployed. This,
again, is no prediction; it is already happening. This book is a wakeup call.
New mindsets are essential to success.
Yes, I can guarantee that the future will be bumpy, tough to predict, and
unsettling. Something will likely replace the curriculum standards again
(and again). We will probably see continued political, economic, and local
educational pressures. But if you’re ready, it’ll be a bit easier to manage.
Plus, you’ll be someone who thrives while others are just trying to survive.
Welcome to the world of richer teaching. Let’s get started.
PART ONE
WHY THE POSITIVITY MINDSET?
CHAPTER 2
Here you and I begin with a crucial way to think of your job: the positivity
mindset. Students from poverty often come from homes where positivity is
rare (Hart & Risley, 1995). But you have got to be the daily source of a
student’s “mental vitamins.”
You may have heard teachers’ comments about how students from low-
income families are harder to teach or have behavior problems. (You may
have uttered—or perhaps just thought—them yourself.) When working with
students from poverty, it’s important to understand that other factors
influence their behavior. The most important trait you can sharpen is your
empathy, not sympathy. Those with empathy feel others’ pain.
Alternatively, those with sympathy feel sorry for others. To become both
positive and empathic, you’ve got to understand what’s really going on.
This chapter will provide that insight for you.
Student behaviors, as you may predict, often start at home. Higher rates
of acute stress and trauma are more common in families from poverty. You
need to know this because many students’ behaviors that may be disruptive
(or even offensive) may be a result of things at home that are completely
out of a student’s control. Persons in poor households have more than
double the rate of violent victimization than those in high-income
households (Harrell, Langton, Berzofsky, Couzens, & Smiley-McDonald,
2014). Additionally, a poor mother’s history affects students’ behaviors in
your classrooms. For example, poor African American women report high
rates of rape—far more than Caucasians, Latinos, and Asians. This sexual
assault, in turn, causes adverse mental health effects, such as depression,
guilt, post-traumatic stress disorder, suicidal thoughts, and avoidance
(Ullman, Townsend, Filipas, & Starzynski, 2007). When moms have been
traumatized, every day is a struggle to try to remain loving, calm, grateful,
and caring. Their children often come to school with chronic stress. You
have to be different and teach differently.
For immigrants, the trauma can come from the stressors and adversity
that emerged from a dangerous border crossing, detention, and deportation
threats. Now, you can add the problems of undocumented citizenship status,
separation from family, and of course, extreme poverty. Immigrants report
trauma from fear, depression, loneliness, sadness, and chronic stress
(Crocker, 2015). If you don’t address these issues with positive self-
regulation strategies in your classroom, students can feel overwhelmed and
their classroom behaviors will be seemingly crazy. And students are
unlikely to graduate career or college ready.
For your students, it is just how it is. Actually, it would likely be a
shock if most students from poverty came to school with any sense of hope
and optimism. Instead, many teachers, some of whom are ignorant about a
student’s history, blame bad attitudes on the student. Students didn’t choose
their DNA, parents, neighborhood, or culture. Begin your day with
empathy. Yes, you can change student attitudes, but you have to start by
caring.
There’s another source of stress for your students: racism. When your
students of color feel society’s bias against them, judgment from their
teachers, or exclusion from the middle-class and upper-class world, it
commonly generates chronic stress (Kim, Neuendorf, Bianco, & Evans,
2015). In addition, when students of color live on a constant survival track
and often feel forced to respond to everyday discrimination with
anticipatory vigilance, there’s a cost to their health and sanity
(Himmelstein, Young, Sanchez, & Jackson, 2015). This stress and anxiety
change classroom behaviors and learning.
The Positivity Mindset
Developing a positive mindset in your students makes a huge
difference, and in your classroom, it will alter lives. Before we understand
the thinking of teachers with a positive mindset, let’s contrast it with the
opposite mindset. A teacher who struggles with positivity may say one or
more of the following comments. Ask yourself if you have occasionally
heard these comments at school.
When the comments are written down, they seem mind boggling, don’t
they? As you reflect on comments such as these, consider your own
mindset. Put yourself in a parent’s shoes. Now, if your own son or daughter
had teachers making these comments, how would you feel?
I hit rock bottom several times in life. I bet maybe you have too. I
remember being so desperate, I was writing bad checks weekly just to
survive. I could no longer afford housing, and I was going bankrupt. I had
no one to turn to except my cynical business partner. We became drinking
buddies and soon, we both got worse. I’m telling you this not because I
want sympathy nor am I assigning blame. At that time in my life, I really
needed genuine hope. I have been asked many times, “What turned you
around?”
I have discovered that sometimes to find myself, I had to see what the
opposite of me was like. When I was thirty, I met some amazing positive
role models. For the first time in my life, I saw possibility and regained
hope that I could become someone different and better. But I could not have
told you that I needed them (nor will your students articulate that they need
you). As you might guess, that’s not the mindset we want. The positivity
mindset says, “I am an optimistic and grateful ally who helps students build
a successful narrative of their future.”
In contrast with the teachers’ negative comments, there are many other
teachers with a positive mindset who I have heard make comments like the
following.
Do those comments sound like the teachers are a bit crazy, or have they
found a way to feel at peace, do good things, and still be pretty happy most
of the time? In short, is there any real proof that either point of view is any
better than the other? Can we say that these viewpoints, although very
different, don’t really matter to the students? Let’s look at the evidence.
You may be thinking that a positive mindset will never go over well
with your students. But you’d be mistaken. We can learn a positive mindset
as a type of cognitive control (versus feeling like a victim without choices).
This trait (or lack thereof) makes a significant difference in the brains of
students from poverty (Noble, Norman, et al., 2005; Noble, Tottenham, &
Casey, 2005). How do we know this?
Researchers tested whether ninety-four students at an urban, high-
poverty public middle school could learn and actually apply a
metacognitive strategy for positivity (Noble, Norman, et al., 2005; Noble,
Tottenham, et al., 2005). There were two groups: one control and one
experimental group. The researchers taught students in the experimental
group how to convert positive thoughts and images about a desired future
(goals) into a self-regulated behavior change (that is, cognitive self-control).
It’s a simple but powerful strategy consisting of goals, implementation
intentions, and a plan of overcoming obstacles.
Over four consecutive quarters, students in the experimental group
improved their report card grades, attendance, and even classroom conduct
compared with students from the control group (Duckworth, Kirby,
Gollwitzer, & Oettingen, 2013). These findings suggest emotional and
cognitive control strategies hold considerable promise for helping
disadvantaged students improve their academic performance.
Students are powerfully affected when you teach positivity. Frequent
positive emotions support a defense against adversity (Fredrickson, Tugade,
Waugh, & Larkin, 2003). Pause for a moment; how much of the day do
your students spend feeling positive? A positive classroom environment can
reduce your primary stress indicators like cortisol (Steptoe, Wardle, &
Marmot, 2005). Increasing the neurotransmitter for positive affect
(dopamine) leads to strong improvements in learning (Knecht et al., 2004).
In short, a positive classroom helps your students behave better and
improve their mindsets. It paves the way for them to achieve more.
But there’s an even more compelling reason to raise the positivity level.
Any high-anticipation goal stimulates our brains to produce noradrenaline
and dopamine, the positive neurotransmitters of anticipation of excitement
and pleasure (Fredrickson et al., 2003). You don’t actually need to reach the
goal to feel good (although it’s nice). This is why highly motivating and
challenging classrooms work.
Remember, you are more than what your genes dictate. Simply put,
DNA is not your destiny. You have about twenty thousand genes, many of
which the environment can influence (Clamp et al., 2007). So what’s the
relevance of this number? You have fewer genes than a grape plant or a
chicken (thirty thousand–plus genes each), yet the human species built the
Egyptian pyramids, space shuttles, the Great Wall of China, and the iPhone.
Once again, a student’s genes are not his or her destiny. This is true for you
too.
Epigenetics, the capacity of the environment to impact genes, is
revolutionizing how we see the nature-versus-nurture debate. This capacity
allows the environment to influence whether a gene stays silent
(suppressed) or becomes turned on (activated). In fact, chronic stress is an
example of an everyday experience for your students that can and does
influence gene suppression. For example, childhood trauma increases the
risk of bipolar disorder (Aas et al., 2016). That’s why it’s important to be
empathetic. This is powerful science that backs up the impact of the
positivity mindset and the upbeat classroom climate.
A comprehensive meta-analysis of 121 studies examined the
associations between racial discrimination and mental health (such as
depression and anxiety), lack of well-being, and physical health. Racial
discrimination was present in 76 percent of all adverse outcomes (Priest et
al., 2013). The daily effort to deal with being called a minority (someone
“less than”) as well as seeing the middle class and upper class as unlikely
paths are debilitating stressors for many people (Berger & Sarnyai, 2015).
That negativity is often reality, and hope is rare. If you truly want students
to succeed in a middle- or upper-class world, help them develop the psyche
to survive and thrive. That’s why it is so critical that you infuse your
classroom with daily hope and optimism. Saying, “I will influence student
attitudes” is critical for their success.
The positivity mindset focuses on building both optimism and hope. I’m
inviting you to focus this year on building these traits in students because
they may ensure your students’ success well beyond graduation. You’ll be
developing positivity, hopefulness, and a sense of capacity for lifelong
challenges. Those underpinnings of a solid life can make a positive attitude
become real. Your positivity needs a basis; you must sustain it and
continually find the hidden goodness in nearly everything.
You’ll want to provide both the academic and life skills to sustain hope
and optimism. Here you’ll learn some of the proven ways you can start this
process with your students.
Hope Optimism
“Some things we just don’t have “I have been working on this for a
control over. We just have to while. I think I got it right. Next
trust everything’s going to be week, it’s going to be amazing.”
OK.”
Teaching Perspective
Perspective helps students gain the real power of optimism. Teach your
students how, upon hearing or reading a news story, to look at different
sides of it. For example, say the headline reads, “Six inches of snow
predicted tomorrow; school will be closed!” Ask students who would be
happy about this and who the weather might hurt.
Simple activities in which students take different sides of a topic help
them build alternate points of view and see the positives in each situation.
In this activity, two students pair up, and the teacher gives a scenario. You
might try scenarios like these.
• You got a low score on a test. How could you use this to your
advantage?
• You didn’t get accepted to your first choice for college. How could
that be a good thing?
• You didn’t get the job you wanted. How could that be a positive
thing?
Students alternate giving pros and cons. Share a few examples from
your own life to make the activity real to them. Invite questions so students
start to process this internally.
Do not grade these; the very act of writing about their lives has been
shown to be positive (Lyubomirsky et al., 2006).
Overcoming Setbacks
All of us fail. What counts is what we do after we fail. When you fall
down, get up. That’s the secret; never give up. Give classroom examples of
how you have done this in the past. Then, have students share examples
with the whole class, and ask, “How will you deal with it?”
Using quick-writes is a powerful way to help students understand
themselves and see the world differently. Have students write for three to
ten minutes on overcoming setbacks, such as “How might I solve a problem
I’m having?” “How can I improve my grade on an upcoming test?” It’s
important for students to reflect on times where they’ve failed but refused
to quit.
Let them start the process of problem solving instead of feeling
powerless. Most important, allow students to share what they wrote in small
groups or in front of the class.
There are countless resources available for building a positive,
behavior-changing daily attitude with your students. One of my favorites is
Jack Canfield’s (2015) The Success Principles. Most of the chapters are just
five to ten pages. Read just one chapter per week. Take what you read and
adapt it for your students. You can foster the positivity to overcome
setbacks. See figure 3.1 for a sample poster to hang in your classroom.
Encouraging Dreams
Ask for your students’ dreams and visions of their own future. Help
them find their voices, paths, and strengths. Consider asking the following
introspective questions to get students to think about the future and current
strengths.
You affirm their dreams when you allow them to draw, sing, or share
with others. Instill a class rule: “No dream killers.” As students share their
dreams with others, they may or may not get peer approval. But they will
get support from their teacher—you! Fostering dreams is a hope builder.
Finding a Cause
Help students find a cause where they can donate their time or expertise
to others. At age nine, Katie Stagliano started donating vegetables to
homeless kitchens. Today, her organization, Katie’s Krops
(www.katieskrops.com), helps thousands. This service can help the elderly,
a charity, or an individual student with unusual challenges. For many, it
becomes a life-changing experience. Helping others is an empowering hope
builder.
Don’t ask all students to share in a single day; stretch the activity out
over a few months. To keep the activity fresh, rotate how you do it, and
keep the sharing under four minutes. For example, students can share in
four ways: (1) on paper or in a journal, (2) to their study buddy, (3) within a
cooperative learning group or team, or (4) with the whole class. Remember
to respect their privacy, and give them time to become comfortable with
these powerful self-affirmations. Also, remember to praise effort, choices,
strategies, and attitudes, as a student can manage each of these. Never
praise or showboat about a student’s intelligence or how smart he or she is,
as this is an ineffective form of feedback (Mueller & Dweck, 1998; Rattan,
Savani, Chugh, & Dweck, 2015).
Supporting Dreams
Why not ask students what they want to be doing ten years after they
graduate? You have no idea who a student might become. Consider Monty,
a high school student from Salinas, California (Canfield & Hansen, 2013).
It is a predominately low-income area, where most of the employment is in
agriculture. In English class, his teacher asked him to write about his life
dream for ten years after graduation. Monty wrote a seven-page paper,
detailing how he wanted to own a two hundred–acre ranch with a four
thousand–square-foot house where he could train thoroughbreds. His
teacher gave him an F on the paper. Why? He said that his dream was
unrealistic (after all, he was poor). The teacher told Monty that part of the
assignment was to be practical, and his dream was totally impractical. He
offered Monty a chance to rewrite his paper. After thinking about it
overnight and talking it over with his dad, Monty returned to class and told
his teacher, “I’ll tell you what; you keep the F, and I’ll keep my dream.”
When students do share dreams, don’t criticize or judge them; accept and
support them.
By the way, Monty did get his dream. Today, he owns a two hundred–
acre ranch in Solvang, California, where he raises and trains thoroughbreds
as well as offers training for other horse trainers from around the world.
Monty is the original horse whisperer. He does have a four thousand–
square-foot house and has written multiple bestsellers. He has trained
horses from royalty, and a movie was made about his life. Not bad for a
student whose teacher thought his dreams were too big. What would you
say to a student of yours who wants to be a billionaire, rap mogul,
president, doctor, neuroscientist, or astronaut? Here’s the right answer: “I
love your dream! Let’s sit down and make a plan.”
Quick Consolidation
I have come to understand why daily optimism and positive energy
work so well. It’s more than engagement. It’s more than a coping tool or
happy face in the classroom. Teachers who build a positivity mindset rewire
their students’ brains in profound ways, even affecting their genes
(Fredrickson & Losada, 2005).
You learned several ways to strengthen students’ points of view and
daily positive outlooks. For many students, losing hope means the game is
over—students may drop out. What you have seen so far is this: students do
not create their own attitudes in a vacuum. They get them from others,
including you. The good news is that you have students in a nearly perfect
situation (trapped, in a good way) to influence their brains. Use these
positive strategies every day, and you’ll start seeing and hearing positive
students over time. Your own attitude should be, “Take charge; my students
are going to develop great attitudes, and positivity will come from me every
day!”
Where can you start today?
CHAPTER 4
• Gratitude building
• Service work and acts of kindness
• Personal responsibility and self-regulation
Gratitude Building
Let’s start with gratitude building. Occasionally, teachers raise their
eyebrows when I talk about gratitude, as if they think that gratitude is
something only the elderly ask of their grandchildren: “Be grateful for what
you have!” Actually, it is a transformative human trait, and here’s the
research that proves how powerful it is.
In a study with 221 early adolescents, having a grateful outlook was
associated with enhanced self-reported optimism and life satisfaction and
decreased negative affect. The most significant finding is the robust
relationship between gratitude and satisfaction with school experience
(Froh, Sefick, & Emmons, 2008). This is the key for you; model an attitude
of gratitude. Gratitude affirms what we experience is good. Through
gratitude, we see there are good things in the world. Gratitude grants a gift
to those receiving it and invites us to see how others have supported us.
This makes gratitude both personal and social. Studies suggest that this
“find, remind, and bind” attitude that is part of gratitude can change your
life (and your students’ lives) for the better. In our relationships, it’s
important we remind others of our gratitude, which helps us connect better
(Algoe, 2012). Most of your students have not yet learned this skill. Yet,
this gratitude-building process builds new brain pathways that protect us all
from stress and negativity by fostering relationships and appreciation
(Algoe, Haidt, & Gable, 2008). Let’s begin by building an emotional bank
account stacked with gratitude. See figure 4.1.
To start building this emotional bank account every day, share with your
students something that you are grateful for (your health, family, job,
friends, the weather, and so on). Students need to see an adult showing
gratitude; if you’re not grateful, they’re less likely to buy into the attitude
they need to learn.
Your openness will, over time, help students to become more
comfortable sharing their gratitude with others. If your students like and
respect you, they’re more likely to see building gratitude as something good
that they’d like to try out. An expert in gratitude at the University of
California, Davis, shares these research-based tips for your gratitude
process (Emmons, 2007; Sheldon & Lyubomirsky, 2006). Share them with
students.
Never think that student attitudes are outside your influence. You can
and do influence them every day. But beware: if you do one of the gratitude
activities as a simple time filler, you are highly unlikely to get any good out
of it. Make the activity happen for five to seven minutes a day, three times a
week, for two to six months. Constantly tweak the activity to keep it fresh
with just enough novelty to prevent student boredom. Increase the challenge
and complexity of the activity so the process becomes a worthwhile mental
journey instead of a mindless routine.
Now we’ll take a look at how service work and acts of kindness support
the positivity mindset.
Figure 4.2: Sample gratitude poster.
Service Work
Service work means simply doing public work. Why would students
want to do this? Read “12 Reasons Community Service Should Be
Required in Schools” (Online College, 2012) to learn the benefits of
community service for students.
Where would you or your students start? Use the following as sources
for ideas.
• Local and national news: Look for the stories on existing projects
that others are doing, like a book drive. Many of them could use
help.
• Local animal shelters: Volunteers are used for animal support
tasks, such as cleaning cages, answering phones, or making shelter
waiting rooms a nicer area.
• Parks, community orchards, and beaches: Environments always
have needs that students can fill. Students can plant trees, clean up
unsightly areas, or do beach trash pickups.
• Seniors and nursing homes: Many senior citizens would relish the
time and help as would a private nursing home where volunteers
are also needed. Contact the recreation director who plans
activities.
• Agencies: During the holidays, students can work with agencies
that need temporary help. There are many agencies that need food
or gifts for deserving families. Your students can ask for donations.
• Military families: Look up organizations that ship packages to
troops, such as Operation Gratitude (www.operationgratitude.com)
or Operation Troop Support (http://operationtroopsupport.org). Get
donations and support our troops.
Acts of Kindness
In a study of nineteen elementary classrooms, researchers asked
students to perform three acts of kindness per week over the course of four
weeks. Students who did so experienced significant increases in peer
acceptance, which translated to better behaviors (Layous, Nelson, Oberle,
Schonert-Reichl, & Lyubomirsky, 2012). This sounds good, but what about
adolescents?
At the secondary level, another study had similarly good findings:
students who engaged in daily acts of kindness behaved better in school and
strengthened their resolve to improve academically (Ouweneel, Le Blanc, &
Schaufeli, 2014). Acts of kindness are easy; simply invite students to try
these out while at school.
Consider using the Magic Three strategy and creating lists to stack up
your acts of kindness.
1. If you want them to listen, you go first and say, “I respect (your
right to say that, your feelings, the work you put in, your passion, or
how you feel about that).”
2. You can also say, “I agree with (your position, strategy,
understanding of the topic, or problems).” You may not agree with
their strategy, but you can agree with their intention (the need to
change a rule or system).
3. Finally, you can say, “I appreciate (the hard work you put in, the
way you care about this, your commitment, or you wanting to talk
this through).”
Acts-of-Kindness Lists
Empower students to create their own acts-of-kindness lists so they can
do the things they’ve chosen for themselves. Here are some suggestions to
help students get started.
• Resisting impulsivity
• Assuming good in others
• Paying lengthy attention
• Learning from mistakes
• Complying with adult requests, as appropriate
• Deferring gratification
• Managing stress
• Managing negative self-talk
• Being patient before getting angry
• Thinking before responding
• Having situational awareness
Role modeling is key to teaching students how to run their own brains.
Consider the following teacher-student conversation.
Teacher: You’ve got a great attitude about learning. What’s needed to help get
you to proficiency is a more locked in, focused effort until you’re done.
As I said, you’ve got a lot going for you. Now, tell me what you heard
me say.
Student: I heard you say that I ain’t working hard enough.
Teacher: That’s part of it. I said two things. First, I appreciate your attitude, and I
like that about you. Second, a more solid effort will help you get the
grades that will help you graduate.
Student: Well, what if I don’t care whether I graduate or not?
Teacher: Your high school diploma simply gives you more choices in life. You
want your own car? A diploma helps you get the job that buys the car.
You may not like certain classes in school, but school helps you develop
and nail down habits like everyday attitudes, job skills, people skills, on-
time habits, and work effort. In school, we practice learning and
accomplishing things. Why? You can use them in your life and get paid
for them in your job. Does that make sense?
Student: Yeah, I get it. I just don’t feel like doing this.
Teacher: I get it too; that’s part of growing up. You won’t like everything in the
world that you have to do. I don’t like washing my car, taking out the
trash, or paying bills, but I do it. Tell you what; let’s meet for three
minutes after class, and I’ll help you make a plan that might save you
some time. Can you meet me halfway on this?
Quick Consolidation
Every time I read about or visit with high performers, I learn something
profound. These teachers are a magnificent walking database of insights
and solutions. A surprising focus for these teachers is on the power of
emotions and how they impact others. You may be one of many who
already tap into this powerful tool. In this chapter, you got several key
strategies proven to help students become more positive.
• Gratitude building
• Service work and acts of kindness
• Personal responsibility and self-regulation
After all, no matter how good your students get, unless you help them
internalize those strengths and feel good about themselves for a solid
reason, they will always have paralyzing doubts that hold them back.
CHAPTER 5
This chapter continues to fill your toolbox with tools for building the
positivity mindset. When students are in a positive state of mind, they have
fewer behavioral issues and better academic results. Control, choice, and
relevancy are core factors that suggest the potency of what I call the
invisible teaching velocity—a process so subtle that other teachers may
miss it when watching rich teaching. It’s easy to miss these strategies.
Why? They may seem inconsequential, but they are not. When you give
students more choice and control over their daily experiences and show
them the relevancy of what they’re doing, you can reach them emotionally
and personally. But why do these three work so well, and why should you
care? That’s the topic of this chapter, but first you’ll want a brief bit of
background.
Granting students choices and control over the content and when they
study it can enhance long-term memory (Murty, DuBrow, & Davachi, 2015;
Voss, Gonsalves, Federmeier, Tranel, & Cohen, 2011). (See chapter 12,
page 103, for more on memory.) This is powerful research; when students
choose, they are more likely to form strong memories.
This also tells us that gimmick-free choices are important (such as
allowing them to choose any topic to write about). Your students can tell
instantly when teachers use bribes, punishments, or rewards to coerce them.
Initially, a student’s response might be, “How do I play the game to avoid
pain or gain pleasure?” Ultimately, it is the strength of your relationship
with students that will help with their decision making (“That’s not a good
choice, but I like her, so I’ll roll with it”). In the short term, some reward-
based strategies might work, but be cautious about assuming all students
like rewards. You run the risk of students saying, “I didn’t really have a
choice. I was conned.” They will always correlate rewards, in the long haul,
with loss of control. There is no real choice if students cannot make a free,
uncoerced decision about the learning. Allow students to choose a topic to
learn, the type of presentation (such as PowerPoint, lecture, or a skit), and
the week in which to present it. Stop using concrete rewards (like points for
prizes or parties), and start with what matters most to students: a feeling of
control, choice, and meaning (relevance). For example, selecting a student’s
mathematics or science project to appear in a fair is both relevant and status
building. It is how we feel that is most important to us.
Students feel more in charge of their lives when they get to choose. A
secondary mathematics teacher gave his students one hundred problems to
start a semester (Soloveichik, 1979). He also gave them choices about when
to do the problems and whether to do the problems. Most students
completed all of them each semester (Soloveichik, 1979). Students are more
likely to love mathematics when they understand how to do the problems,
when it is a social activity, and when they get choices.
It’s critical to “sell the choice” by drawing attention to it and the
benefits of having it because otherwise, they won’t see it or appreciate it.
Your goal is to make the choice sound good so that students are excited
about being able to choose. For example, say something like, “Hey, we are
about to do something, but first, I have an idea. How many of you would
like to have a choice on whether you work alone or with a partner so you
can do things your way? (Hands go up.) Great, I thought so. How many
would rather choose from among three project ideas instead of me assigning
one to you? This time, you do get a choice, so go ahead and get started.”
When students share their choices, honor them. Never diminish
students’ choices. If a student makes a poor choice, say, “I would never
have guessed that you would choose that. Tell me more about your decision.
How did you come up with it?” This shows that you care. On a practical
note, remember to be mindful of your voice volume and tonality. Never yell
at students or embarrass them in front of their peers. Certainly avoid
sarcasm and threats to your students, since both may trigger the stress
response.
Figure 5.2 offers strategies for control, choice, and relevancy. The
following sections describe these in more detail. Then, we’ll take a look at
control, choice, and relevancy in action in a real classroom.
Quick Writes
Some teachers struggle to come up with choices all day. One of the
simplest strategies is also one of the most powerful: writing. Through
writing, students have a chance to express their voice. It also builds
vocabulary, formalizes thoughts, and organizes ideas. It’s a concrete
takeaway to show parents or store at home. These all contribute to a more
positive mindset because students feel more in control so their stress goes
down. Quick writes allow students to use choice for a short time. They
choose their own words and can solve a problem. Three groups of students
wrote about either a positive or negative emotional event for fifteen minutes
over three days (Lyubomirsky et al., 2006). At the end, which do you think
felt better, emotionally?
Suggestions Box
A suggestions box is another form of choice; give students the right to
communicate their needs, voice an opinion, or make requests. Encourage
this input before class, during class, in notes you write, and during one-on-
one time. Ask, “What do you think?” or “How do you feel about this?”
Then, ask, “How could you let others know what you care about?”
Self-Assessments
Involve students in assessments. Give students access to the scores and
the potential follow-up strategies to fix any problems. Students can discuss
with their teacher the 3Ms. They are: (1) What is my milestone? (Where am
I right now or what score did I get?), (2) What is my mission? (How can I
get 100 percent on the next quiz or test?), and (3) What is my method to get
there? (What’s my plan to fulfill mission?). When your students can
effectively self-assess, they feel an important sense of control over their
lives.
Class Jobs
Grant autonomy through class jobs. Remind students weekly that they
always have a choice in life; they are their own bus drivers.
• Ensure students have key roles in class. These could include stretch
or energizer leader (fitness trainer), announcement maker (news
anchor), team leader (group manager), summarizer (writer or
reporter), logistics manager, and others.
• Give overt choices about when students can accomplish a task,
with whom they will do it, which format the work will be done on,
and what the deliverable will be. Just don’t make any two of those
choice variables at the same time.
Quick Consolidation
You saw two primary behavior responses to chronic stressors: (1)
hypervigilance (such as alertness, edginess, or anger) and (2) learned
helplessness (detachment and demotivation). You can either get frustrated
with students’ behavior or take action to help them and make your own
workplace a positive environment. Choice, control, and relevancy are
connected. Give your students relevant choices and help them develop
autonomy over their daily experiences. Most typical middle- and upper-
class students will get tastes of choice, control, and relevancy at home. But
students raised in poverty typically experience fewer of these, which can
generate helplessness and anger. The solution is to be mindful of these
success factors. These invisible factors are not typically in your standards or
lesson plans. But they should be. Can you start this process? When can you
begin?
CHAPTER 6
Going back hundreds of years, two of the biggest mistaken beliefs include,
“The Earth is flat” and “Brains can’t change.” Today, we know better. The
Earth is round, and brains can change. In fact, the so-called set point for
weight management (feeling full) can be changed, as well as your tolerance
for pain (the ouch tolerance), your happiness (joy), and your stress level.
The emotional set point signifies a person’s most common emotional state.
For some, it is frustration and anger. For others, it is calmness and joy. The
good news is teachers can alter a student’s emotional set point.
What’s the relevance of this? We now know that we can help students
who were considered incorrigible, lazy, or aggressive. It just takes the right
mindset and skill set. When you do this, you are a richer teacher. The
problem is most people don’t have the mindset or know how to change the
set points, so their usual (and false) conclusion is, “Maybe it is just not
possible to change these students.” This conclusion is a huge mistake for
two reasons. First, the teacher is robbed of the joy of transforming a student
into a healthy adult who will find work, meaning, and success. Second, the
student (whom the teacher has given up on) becomes relegated to a life
absent of the joys of transformation, change, and meaning.
See figure 6.2. You might think, “Happy is happy. It’s just a matter of
how mild or intense.” But there’s more to it than that.
To understand how and why these tie into teaching, it’s important to
know how your brain responds differently to each of the three happiness
types.
The first type of happiness is spontaneous joy as from a surprise
(running into a good friend, eating a meal that turned out better than
expected, seeing or smelling a beautiful flower, or watching your hapless
team win at the last second). The primary distinction here is that the joy is
unplanned and unpursued. In the classroom, it could happen when a teacher
surprises her students with a joke, a fun energizer, a funny story, or an early
departure. The brain’s response is the release of dopamine, the
neurotransmitter of pleasure.
Hedonic happiness is distinguished by two qualities: (1) it is a planned
pursuit, and (2) the person seeks pleasure as the outcome. This is known as
a hedonic experience, which is often, but not always, part of our everyday
lives. You may know people who have dangerous hobbies such as
gambling, unrestrained cravings for fatty or sweet foods, or alcohol
addiction, or even just spend excessive time on the Internet, shop
compulsively, or constantly gossip about peers. This hedonic pleasure has
some problems. In the classroom, you might reinforce hedonic happiness
with the chronic use of material rewards such as bribes of sweets and treats
or points redeemable for more rewards.
Again, the primary distinction here is that people plan and look forward
to a predictable outcome from the experience. Do you reward yourself with
food when something good happens? Do you promise good things to your
students if they behave right? That’s a likely mistake (Disabato, Goodman,
Kashdan, Short, & Jarden, 2015). The brain’s response to a prediction of
reward is the release of dopamine, the neurotransmitter of pleasure (Sharot,
Shiner, Brown, Fan, & Dolan, 2009). But after several times, the brain
habituates to the reward, meaning that once the reward happens, it releases
no dopamine. The pleasure response diminishes, and the rewarded behavior
becomes a letdown. This type of happiness becomes harder and harder to
achieve. This is one reason why drugs are so addictive.
Humans can become addicted to anything: drugs, sex, sugar, fats, cars,
shopping, and crime. Addiction is a biological state that drives the organism
with a compulsive engagement to receive the rewarding stimuli, despite
adverse consequences and a loss of control over the behavior. In the
classroom, students can become driven to get a teacher’s reward, in spite of
it being bad for the student.
The third type of happiness is eudaimonic (pronounced you-day-monic).
Eudaimonic happiness leads directly to meaningful goals—just as
graduating (see the graduation mindset on page 121). Make it your goal to
foster an emotionally positive classroom climate. Happier students work
harder and are far more enjoyable to teach. This happy state comes not from
consuming but from producing something. It’s the byproduct of a sustained
effort in working toward something bigger than you: seeking purposeful
and meaningful goals. It’s the pursuit of big goals and mastery learning.
This type of joy actually fuels the drive to achieve and helps the body thrive
too. In fact, it’s even associated with increased gray matter in the brain
(Lewis, Kanai, Rees, & Bates, 2014). While there are some anatomical
exceptions and limitations, increases in gray matter (brain mass) and white
matter (myelin coating on connecting tissue between cells known as axons)
are associated with a higher brain functioning. In other words, it is
fabulous!
Those who found happiness by pursuing the greater good (long-term,
eudaimonic, purposeful goals) had a lower level of inflammatory gene
expression and strong antiviral and antibody gene expression (Algoe &
Fredrickson, 2011). This is a dramatically healthier profile, and the benefits
include better school attendance for the secondary students in the study.
These individuals are more likely to stay healthy, avoid drugs, and exhibit
greater resilience (Cohn, Fredrickson, Brown, Mikels, & Conway, 2009).
Wouldn’t you wish these benefits for your students?
Quick Consolidation
There are several types of happiness. The serendipity of a simple,
surprising happy moment is, of course, still a great idea. But the pursuit of
pleasure for pleasure’s sake is not very good for our well-being. The long-
term pursuit of meaningful goals is actually more than invigorating; it’s
healthier and more positive than short-term pleasure seeking.
This is why tough projects and goals can work miracles with your
students. If you reflected on each of these earlier, you have already started
the process for a high-achieving classroom. These create a highly positive
classroom climate. Your students will love coming to school when you
sustain these in your work. How can you get started on these strategies?
CHAPTER 7
She starts with developing a new identity for her students. She
addresses them as scholars and cultivates a no-excuses attitude in her class.
She empowers her students to take responsibility for how they’re doing in
several ways. She teaches them to start with themselves, not blame others.
Her students become proficient in technology, and she makes students’ data
available to them so they can see how they’re doing. She encourages
students to develop a positive attitude through accountability,
empowerment, and responsibility. She debriefs students on their progress to
shape their ongoing narratives and develop their identities.
Her students learn about attitudes in many ways during class. She
introduces her vision, the big goal. To help reach it, she teaches students to
reflect on their wins (classroom successes) and challenges (the current
problem to overcome). This helps her students link actions to goals using
attribution thinking: “When I do this, I get that.” As with other high
performers, she “walks the talk” and models what she teaches. For example,
she videotapes her classes and reviews her own work for mistakes or lost
opportunities.
This teacher is a light that shines every day with the positivity mindset.
She continually asks herself, “In what ways can I develop unbridled hope
and optimism and still keep my students grounded in reality?” These
positive attitudes are not only teachable, but countless teachers have already
proven to do an amazing job of teaching them. The preceding chapters have
shown you how to develop them in your students.
Fill in the following blanks with your name and a strategy from this
mindset. Repeat the phrase daily until it’s automatic.
“I, ________, am committing to developing the positivity mindset with
my students every single day. I will begin with one of the strategies
mentioned, which is ________. I will continue this until I have mastery and
it’s automatic. At that point, I’ll learn something new to foster student
success.”
Quick Consolidation
The positivity mindset influences many areas of teaching. You get
opportunities to develop and foster positivity through optimism and hope;
positive attitudes; choice, control, and relevancy; and the emotional set
point. The hard work is in choosing, over and over, to do the work. The
work itself is just work—you already do that every day. You’re invited to
do the same amount of work you already do but just a little differently.
Once you begin supporting the positivity mindset, you’ll be growing
students emotionally every day. Next up, let’s build your students
cognitively.
PART TWO
WHY THE ENRICHMENT MINDSET?
CHAPTER 8
Like many teachers at the beginning of the school year, I used to notice
myself making those instant judgments about my students as they arrived.
Today, in light of the new research on teacher beliefs and mindsets, I am
embarrassed to admit thinking things like, “I’ll bet she will do really well”
or “He probably won’t do that well.” Even though I thought of myself as
positive and encouraging to my students, in retrospect, I would bet that
students could sense my small doubts. In fact, they were hearing, “My
teacher doesn’t like me or believe in me.”
Your first response may be, “It’s only human to think that way.”
Although you might be right, if your goal is to maximize every student’s
potential, you just dropped the ball. A teacher who thinks this is not
supporting the enrichment mindset. While those with the growth mindset
(Dweck, 2008) say, “We can all grow,” the enrichment mindset broadens
the concept to “We can all grow above and beyond what we thought was
possible.”
The question I should have asked was: “If I actually buy that all
students can learn, why would I put any mental limit on a student?” The
answer is important. When I thought about some students having a
cognitive limitation, the person I was really thinking about was myself.
Yes, it’s true. When a teacher, anywhere, talks about a student’s
cognitive limitations, he or she is commonly talking about his or her own
limitations. Teachers with this thinking are talking about their own inability
to reach and teach students in ways that propel them forward. If teachers
say that they’ll never be able to improve the IQ of a student with learning
delays, that is their own personal experience and history of frustrations.
Students with learning delays are typically behind grade level in speech,
language, memory, and writing skills. But on a larger scale, IQ in learning-
delayed students often improves with the right strategies (Duyme, Dumaret,
& Tomkiewicz, 1999).
• “If they haven’t learned how to do this by now, they’ll never learn
it.”
• “These students have failed so much before, they already know
they can’t do it.”
• “Some students get it and others don’t. I cover the content. If
they’re ready, they’ll learn it.”
• “You can see it in their eyes. Some students have just given up.”
• “He tried hard, but bless his heart. It’s not going to happen.”
The bottom line is that your thoughts and beliefs do matter. The belief
changes the decision you make, which in turn changes your behaviors.
Behaviors over time become habits, and those habits become your
character. The enrichment mindset says, “I know brains can change. I can
grow and change myself first. Then, I can build powerful cognitive skills in
my students.”
• Lack of effort
• A poor attitude
• Inappropriate strategy
• Lack of tools
• Insufficient experience
This trend continued five years later. The thirty-year follow-up for the
experimental group revealed that grade 12 (high school graduation) was the
median completed grade versus grade 2.75 (about third grade) for the
control group who stayed in the orphanage (Skeels, 1996). Finally, to
emphasize the possible far-reaching implications, the twenty-eight children
from the parents of the experimental group who became parents (the next
generation) had a mean IQ from school records of 104. This shows the
difference enrichment made on the students’ lives. Remember this study in
your everyday work: your students’ brains can change. Are you willing to
give this a try?
You see, it’s limiting when a teacher says, “You can’t do that!” To be
more truthful, a teacher might say, “I wish I knew how to help this student.
She deserves better.” That statement is honest, but most people use the
coping tool to justify or blame others (“It’s the student’s fault”), so they can
sleep at night. But you and I now know better. This is a challenge, but I
suspect you are up for it. Consider the conversation in figure 8.2.
Let me rephrase what you just read. You may have heard a teacher
saying, “Kevin’s just not going to get good at mathematics” or “Sheron has
a tough time with writing; it’s just not her thing.” The teacher is really
saying, “I don’t know how to help Kevin or Sheron do better, so I’ll speak
as if no one could ever help him or her succeed.” You can help them
succeed, and I’ll show you how.
Just in case you’re still wondering if students’ brains can change, let’s
review more scientific research on whether the brain is fixed or malleable,
if a growth mindset is teachable, how to respond when students struggle,
and the cognitive differences of students from poverty.
Next, research with K–5 children using computer games shows that the
growth mindset enhances persistence (O’Rourke, Haimovitz, Ballweber,
Dweck, & Popovic, 2014). And even in the toughest classes (like physics),
secondary students with the growth mindset did better than those with a
fixed mindset (Flores, Lemons, & McTernan, 2011).
In secondary mathematics classes, students with growth mindset
training outperformed those who did not get this training, even two years
after the initial exposure (Blackwell, Trzesniewski, & Dweck, 2007).
Students’ academic performance improves when they are simply exposed to
a growth mindset, even when the teaching itself remains the same.
In one study (Jensen, 2014) with ten high-poverty schools (75 percent
or more students in poverty), half of the schools were high performing (in
the top 25 percent of academic performers in the state) and half were low
performing (lowest 25 percent of academic scores in the state). What was
the difference in these schools? The students were from high-poverty
backgrounds, but the staff at the high-performing schools fostered a better
growth mindset, created a strong school culture, and built cognitive
capacity.
When students struggle, how do they respond? How do you respond?
As we have learned, how we deal with failure can support the enrichment
mindset, if we first have a growth mindset. See figure 8.4 (page 72).
Quick Consolidation
This chapter introduces the enrichment mindset. Although the growth
mindset is powerful, it can be broadened to include specific instructional
strategies. The single thread through this part is that brains can grow and
change and our students can change. We just have to go first.
We all have to examine our mindsets and, when needed, change them.
On any single day, you have to choose between sharing a negative story or
investing a few minutes of time to help a student with his or her effort,
make the smart choice, and succeed. I have visited hundreds of high-
poverty schools, and the biggest differences are the educators’ mindsets and
actions. Your staff members need to take note of Skeels’s (1966) mindset,
and how he enriched students instead of feeling sorry for them. You must
enrich students like crazy to ensure they succeed. When staff members have
the negative mindsets about a student being a bad seed or not likely to
succeed, the negativity becomes contagious and the student struggles.
This is your opportunity to show your own capacity to grow and help
students graduate. If you now recognize your own fixed mindset, your
students are not likely to succeed unless you change it. We might call
mindset a soft skill, but that’s no reason to dismiss it. For some, the
difference in mindset is the difference between weak compliance and a huge
motivated effort. Alternatively, the mindset may be the difference between
staying down and getting back up. The bottom line is that mindset affects
each of us differently based on our personal history. Help your students
develop the mindset they need to succeed. The next few chapters contain all
the strategies you need. You’ll never regret your decision.
The following four chapters offer strategies to help you enrich your
students. These strategies include the following.
Before we get started on enriching your students’ brains, you should know
what you’re up against. When I was an adolescent, I remember sitting in the
back of the classroom. My mind usually wandered to questions like, “What
will it be like when I go home after school?” I constantly worried about
what my abusive stepmother would do. Thoughts that centered on safety
were strong and recurring. They seemed to compete with, or block out,
thoughts about the class content. Many of your students may have more
than an abusive caregiver; they may be facing the burden of raising a
younger brother or sister. They may be facing daily racism from the
community. They may be hungry and unable to concentrate or can be
wondering where they will sleep that night. A student with this much stress
has a serious cognitive load.
Third, teach students coping skills to help them learn to survive when
things get extra tough. For example, use positive self-talk. “Stand up. Take
in a slow, deep breath. Ask yourself what your goal is. Answer the question.
Let the breath out fully. Clench fists quickly three times. Run in place for
ten seconds. Say, I can do this. Now take one small step toward your goal.”
Strong teachers help students feel more (not less) control over their lives.
They engage students with relevant, consuming, nearly impossible goals.
Give students a reason to be in school every day. Finally, teaching cognitive
skills for reasoning, deferred gratification, and working memory enriches
students’ thinking in class. Here are tools you can use to counter the
cognitive load on the brain.
Chunk Material
Why is chunking more important to students from poverty than nonpoor
students? Chronic stress impairs working memory. Working memory is the
skill of holding pictures or sounds in your head and manipulating them to
come up with answers or opinions. For your students, big chunks of
information can be intimidating without content background or a strong
working memory. When teachers cover content quickly, students are often
overwhelmed. They may not have the background or the working memory
to process it at the same pace, so they tune out. Break things into three- to
six-minute chunks to produce sizable gains (Russell, Hendricson, &
Herbert, 1984), and invest more time in retrieving previous content, not
adding more. Chunking your content into smaller, bite-sized pieces helps
students digest more easily; avoid bigger chunks that they simply forget.
Spaced Relevance
Here we combine two terms: spacing learning and relevance. Spaced
relevance is most effective when teachers use it every other day or at the
middle of the period between content introduction and testing to enhance
retrieval (Cepeda et al., 2009). Distributed learning (spread out) trumps
massed (bunched up into a short period) learning. Students’ recall improves
especially when you add content relevance (Sartori, Lombardi, & Mattiuzzi,
2005). See figure 9.3. In figure 9.3, we begin with a body of content. In one
case (on the left), the content is taught at once. To the right, the content is
broken into three chunks (preview, main body, and a post-review synthesis).
The best review is retrieval, not just looking at familiar content. Give
students time to think and figure out what they know instead of looking it
up. In short, just studying is poor learning, and adding retrieval makes for
strong learning.
Source: Cepeda et al., 2009.
Quick Consolidation
Enriching means we’ll have to be cognizant of the whole student if he
or she is going to succeed. Cognitive load issues are huge with students
from poverty. You may see and hear students in class who often seem
distracted, unfocused, inattentive, and impulsive. Please try to drop these
labels and judgments. They are common symptoms of a stress disorder.
When the brain is consumed with survival, it uses up mental space it needs
for academic excellence. You can either notice the issue and make the
students the problem or change what you do and help them succeed. I
promise your results will be better if you make building relationships and
ensuring safety (cognitive, emotional, and intellectual) your number-one
priorities. Then, build in the strategies that will help with memory and
recall. These are ways you can enrich students to help them succeed.
CHAPTER 10
Thinking skills are a broad category. When we say that a student has
good thinking skills, we often include the ability to pay attention; exert a
strong locus of control; evaluate, process, prioritize, and sequence content;
hold information in short-term memory; compare and contrast; extrapolate
and use working memory while manipulating the content; and finally, defer
gratification until the answers are necessary. That’s more than half a dozen
subskills and one reason why thinking skills are a challenge to teach.
Because it is nearly impossible to declare a universal thinking formula,
the process of teaching students to think critically is far more effective if
you empower students to do the right type of thinking at the right time.
Cognitive expert Daniel Willingham (2008) defines critical thinking as
having effectiveness, novelty, and self-direction. Critical thinking is only
effective when students avoid common mistake biases (seeing only one side
of an issue, discounting new evidence that runs counter to their ideas,
failing to use basic rules of logic, or failing to look for evidence).
Willingham (2008) asserts the thinking must be novel, not a memorized
formula from a familiar situation. He also says critical thinking is self-
directed; the thinker must be doing the thinking, not following a teacher’s
or coach’s prompts. This understanding is what real enrichment is all about.
Many believe thinking skills are genetic. Parents love to say their
children are smart. After all, there is a genetic component to nearly every
human trait. Among the broad category of thinking skills, one subset is
reasoning skills. But reasoning skills, like many other thinking skills, have a
low effect size of 0.23 (Plomin, Haworth, & Davis, 2009). The effect size is
statistically significant, but not even moderate as far as effect sizes go.
Robert Plomin, one of the world’s foremost geneticists, says, “Despite our
three-stage study demonstrating enrichment of associations for general
cognitive ability, the genetic variants that make up the heritable component
of intelligence remain elusive” (as cited in Davis et al., 2010, p. 762).
Plomin is saying the genetic subsets are hard to find in our genes. Yes, there
is heritability for intelligence, but it is negligible in those from poverty
(Tucker-Drob, Rhemtulla, Harden, Turkheimer, & Fask, 2011).
In fact, a good bit of evidence shows thinking skills can be taught, if
you know how to do it right—and if you believe in the enrichment mindset,
which says you can change and grow.
The preceding list offers generic steps to teach and learn reasoning
skills. In the next section, I’ll spell out some specific strategies. This is not a
formula but rather a set of reminders. Remember, teach thinking strategies
with the context of the content you have. In other words, these skills have
moderate to low transfer. Use your own subject matter and foster the skills
that apply to your class. A student may mount an argument against a
nominal issue, missing the bigger point. Teach students to use every tool on
this list so they’ll be able to learn the right tools for the right problems. This
means teaching thinking skills across the curriculum.
Building reasoning skills takes willingness to try the process out and
positive belief in your students. These findings support adopting a
deliberate (planned with enough time and quality feedback) practice
approach when learning informal reasoning (Barnett & Ceci, 2002; Reeves
& Weisberg, 1994). There are many simple strategies you can employ in the
classroom. The following are some of my favorite problem-solving paths.
Deconstruct Constructs
Teach students how to use, critique, and deconstruct constructs.
Constructs are shared abstractions (ideas or theories) among people. These
might include phrases such as the typical family or today’s students.
Understanding reasoning skills means we must understand the essence of a
topic. The essence in part comprises a concept’s unique qualities or
properties. In other words, what makes that word (or idea, thing, or person)
unique? Students must work hard mentally to do this, and they’ll need
guidance from you. What properties can we agree on for your students from
poverty?
For a classroom example, let’s say the concept is justice. Let students
partner up and make a list of their associations with that concept. Students
(depending on grade level) might come up with words like fairness, legal,
police, retribution, courts, justice, civil rights, and laws. They might divide
issues of justice into clusters such as society, house, and neighborhood.
Soon, students will begin to see certain words define something very
well. Justice takes on a whole new meaning for students when they see all
the ways to understand it (or to lack understanding of it). For example,
courtroom justice is different than street justice. Students can’t reason
without knowing how to relate to, connect, and deconstruct each construct.
Then, ask for the types of claims they are making about a word.
Students may have personal experiences and narratives that enrich some of
the concepts. This is the starting point for a fabulous writing assignment
that gives students a stronger voice. Personal experience is a type of claim,
and so is a peer-reviewed journal. Let them start with their own voice, and
then ask them to organize their thoughts, bring in claims, and write the
conclusion.
1. Students select the problem at their seats and work with partners to
talk through it both before they try it out and during the actual
problem solving.
2. Students stand as they share their thinking during a whole-class
discussion; you help guide them to think more deeply or find more
useful ways of understanding a topic.
You and I would never argue that the preceding schema is the only or
best set of steps. But it can work for students, if you allow it to work.
You will want to have your own process for using powerful questions.
The ones I use include the following.
You can say, “Thanks for jumping in” or “I love your ideas.” The core
understanding here is simple. Reasoning skills, one of the absolute basics of
higher-order thinking and executive functioning, are a teachable process. If
you fail to teach them, your students may miss out for the rest of their lives
on the skills you take for granted. Now, let’s take your students to an even
higher cognitive level.
• Identifying what they know and what they need to ask more about
• Creating a circle of varied viewpoints and questions
• Employing statements like, “I used to think __________, and now I
think ___________.”
• Fostering two opposing views and a verbal tug-of-war with
questions
• Using sentence-phrase-word representation of meaning and new
questions (students explain their thinking in one sentence, then
shorten to a phrase, and then a word)
This chapter focuses on two brain builders (study skills and vocabulary)
that are core for enriching students. Before we get started, consider this: the
symptoms that you see in your classroom when students lack these skills
are usually apathy, discouragement, and low motivation. Those symptoms
might lead an unknowing teacher to believe the student has an attitude or
effort problem. After all, those are common. But often, especially with the
poor, you’re just as likely to see a lack-of-skill problem or a relevance issue.
Before you ever judge a student, hold up a mirror, and ask yourself if you
have tried all the options first.
Contextual Study Skills
I begin this section with a word of caution about study skills. The use of
specific study aids (such as study guides, study procedures, and advanced
organizers like text outlines) shows very promising results with large effect
sizes (0.77 and up; Petty, 2009). But there are also studies that show little or
no effect (Petty, 2009). So, why the big range in effectiveness? It depends
on how specific the subject is. When the study process is fairly general and
more abstract, the research consensus is that direct teaching of general, all-
purpose study skills is not highly effective—about a 0.45 effect size (Petty,
2009). See figure 11.1.
Generic study skills can build confidence and improve attitude, but the
effect size is unremarkable (Hattie, 2009). Research on study skills is
complicated because (Biggs, 1987) of the following.
Here we focus on what we do know that works really well. First, while
there are individual tactics that do have strong effect sizes, it’s refreshing to
have a unified system that raises the likelihood of success. Figure 11.2
illustrates the top study process achievement boosters (Petty, 2009). These
boosters should be in every student process for subject-specific study skills
that you will develop, with help from your colleagues. Each high-impact
study skill is powerful by itself. But when combined with the others, you
will have the means to develop amazing learners. Walk students through
each study step as a class. Then, let them do the step in pairs. Finally, when
they have gained confidence, allow them to solve problems on their own.
But why make the study skills so subject specific?
Figure 11.2: High-impact study skills.
The use of study aids like summarizing and note taking can bump up
progress with a 1.0 effect size (Marzano, 2001) or two years’ worth of
gains. Structural aids are strategies that show the specific framework of
what students are learning. These aids, which might be an outline or other
visual aid, have a strong effect size of 0.58 (but can go up to over 1.1), as
0.50 is one year’s gain in academic achievement.
Following are some other helpful study aids.
By the way, the use of gesturing and other nonverbal strategies (mind
mapping, models, and so on) for learning and teaching vocabulary has a
huge 2.27 effect size—over four years’ worth of gains (Marzano, 1998).
Ask students to pair up and demonstrate each new word, using words and
gestures to help remember it.
Give students chances (through class discussion or assignments) to use
all the words of the week. Teachers can use fun celebrations each time a
student uses a word of the week. For example, every time it happens, the
whole class stands up and says, “Oh, yes! I love this!” or add partner or
team cheers to celebrate. In the following weeks, engage cooperative
groups or student teams to review random vocabulary words from the
comprehensive list.
Quick Consolidation
This chapter focused on learn-to-learn skills. Study skills and
vocabulary are two huge difference makers in the potential success of
students from poverty. Either your students will have a good chance at
college or not. With study skills and vocabulary skills, your students can
stand tall among the competition for a job. I am certain that you can
understand the effect these strategies have on student achievement. To
enrich learners, it’s important for teachers to say, “I will grow my students
in any way I can with core study skills and vocabulary.”
Please, while this is fresh in your mind, lock in on something from this
chapter, add it to your lesson plan, and make it part of your menu for next
week. You’ve got students who just hope to have a great teacher this year.
Are you that teacher?
CHAPTER 12
As we’ve seen, the human brain can change. Students from poverty can
grow new brain cells, make connections, and hence, develop a superb
memory. This supports the purpose of intentional brain building and not
sorting students, making excuses, or feeling sorry for them. What cognitive
skills would give you the greatest return on the investment of your time?
Strong examples might include teaching writing, reading, reasoning,
memory, and study skills. Those are all great, but which do you think is
best? Please take this brief quiz.
When I attended grades K–12, not one teacher taught me memory skills.
No wonder school was so hard for me! Are there ways to strengthen student
memory? Yes! Let’s explore several of them. Check out the following
strategies to build long-term memory skills.
• Timing: Pause every one to two minutes for ten to fifteen seconds
while lecturing. Be sure to spread out the content over time and
ensure students practice retrieving the content to strengthen
memory.
• Semantic: Teach students how to turn a list of words into a useful
acronym, abbreviation, or anagram (see page 106). In addition,
discussing a topic and writing about it will strengthen memory.
• Body: Be sure to ask students to explain a concept while gesturing,
and then draw the information using stick figures or diagrams and
mind maps.
• Feelings: Use relevant emotions. The five most common emotions
are joy, disgust, fear, anger, and sadness.
Mnemonics
Near the top of the list of optimal long-term memory strategies is
mnemonics (Hattie et al., 1996). Mnemonics is the broad use of memory
strategies such as stories, loci (location-based memory), and peg words (a
base list of numbers associated with a picture) with a huge effect size of
1.09.
Emotions
Make learning emotional, and the significance and permanence of the
classroom experience will strengthen long-term memory (McGaugh, 2013).
How do you do this? It’s easy; ask yourself, “What usually engages
emotions?” Use movement, competition, surprise, role plays, or suspense as
part of the learning process to help embed the learning emotionally for
long-term memory. Using highly relevant content can help students care
about or connect with what you’re teaching. Emotions at the middle range
(not too strong or not too weak) can support a better memory. For example,
a science teacher wants to show what happens when you combine a small
amount of crushed saltpeter, charcoal, and sulfur at a 6-1-1 ratio (by
weight). She mixes them in a mortar, moistened for safety, and grinds them
together with the pestle for about ten minutes. Then, she ignites the mixture
(it’s gunpowder)—the emotions of surprise and fear will help students
remember the activity. The emotional memory is for the gist of what
happened, not for a list of details about it.
Music
Use music to hook students’ interest in a topic. We have all had the
experience of learning content in school with a song (such as learning the
alphabet). Just adding one song or hearing a musical component during
instruction can help students learn the content. Need classroom songs about
chemistry, social class, politics, animals, teenage angst, war, nutrition,
geography, mathematics, or economics? The Green Book of Songs
(http://greenbookofsongs.com) offers access to thousands of ideas. Teachers
can simply google a topic needing a song, such as “What song can help me
learn the fifty states?” (I suggest “Fifty Nifty United States.”)
Students from poverty need their teachers to support the enrichment
mindset because the more you enrich them using long-term memory
strategies, the more they’ll achieve. Next up, we focus on immediate
memory types, which are just as important.
Name Games
You can begin your school year or semester with memory activities.
Start by doing the well-known name game. Students start the activity by
standing in circles of four or five each. One person starts a sentence with his
or her name and one characteristic (“My name is Eric, and Eric is tall”).
The person to the right continues the introductions, adding his or her name
and repeating the previous name (“Eric is tall, and my name is Diane, and
Diane is kind”). Each new person repeats all previous student introductions.
When a student can’t keep up, the game simply starts over, with the last
student as the first to go. After two weeks, repeat the name game with new
circles of eight to ten, and then increase the group size over time. The goal
is for every student to know every other student’s name.
Vocabulary Builders
When teaching new vocabulary, you know the rules: use the words in
sentences. Introduce the word with a definition, and ask students to define it
to a partner in their own words. You use it in a sentence, and then students
write out an example. Students share the word and definition, get a chance
to draw it out, and quiz a partner. Once they know the words, it’s time for
memory builders.
First, ensure the students know the words spelled forward. Then, every
student gets a partner. They stand and face each other. You can make this an
auditory or visual activity. Each partner has a list of five to ten vocabulary
words. Ensure the list is age appropriate and relevant to the content. One
student begins with the first word on his or her list. He or she says the word,
spells it, uses it in a sentence, and spells it again. Then, the partner has to
spell it forward, use it in a sentence, and then spell it backward, using
working memory.
Ask younger students (grades 2 through 5) to spell two- and three-letter
words forward, then backward from memory. With older students (grades 6
to 12), start with three- to four-letter words. As students improve, add more
letters, maintaining perfect accuracy as you build. Partners can also perform
this activity using flash cards. Remember, this process requires slow
building over time. Avoid starting first graders off with words like
Azerbaijan. Consider adding one letter every two to four weeks. Simply
change the variety, complexity, context, and content to keep it fresh.
Students must be getting 95–100 percent correct over and over for a week
(with three days of practice) before you bump up the word length. Use peer
feedback or have student teams grade written work to determine whether
students are ready. As noted, using anagrams is great practice. Teachers can
give students three letters, and they have to form one or two words from the
letters using their memory (not writing it down). For a resource on
scrambled words, go to Enchanted Learning
(www.enchantedlearning.com/english/anagram/numberofletters).
Number Strings
For working memory practice in mathematics, start with simple two- or
three-digit number strings (using whole, positive numbers). Say these
numbers to your class. Students repeat them back to you first in reverse
order and then in order of smallest to greatest value. Keep each number
string a sequence of unrelated digits. For example, here is a string of
numbers: 364, 792, and 185. Do not say, “three hundred and sixty-four.”
Say, “three, six, four.” Why? The three-digit number is one unit, but giving
the numbers separately gives three separate memory units to store.
Then, as students get better, use four number strings such as 8,364;
3,792; and 4,395. Once you have shown your students how this activity
works, they can partner up and develop skills one on one. This process is
great for building mathematics competencies, because you can continually
build the task in complexity and challenge. Over time, your students will be
able to recite number strings as long as five or six digits at the lower-
elementary level and eight to ten digits at the secondary level.
For a short-term memory activity, get your students to listen carefully as
you say some numbers. Start with single numbers in a serial order. Then,
use two-digit numbers, and build up slowly. Digits should be given at the
rate of one per two or three seconds, no faster. Students repeat the numbers
back to you (or a partner) to trigger short-term, auditory memory. For
example, say “three” then “two.” Students repeat “three, two.” Now, ask
them to repeat the numbers to you in reverse order; that’s working memory
(manipulating the sequence of the numbers mentally).
For younger students (grades K–2), the best to way to learn this skill is
with simple objects. With physical reminders made of plastic or wood (or
simply use small pieces of paper with the number written on it), let students
practice doing this activity at their desks. Allow them to group two
numbers, remember the numbers, regroup them, and then add a number to
get better. Doing this in the physical world is great rehearsal for the mental
world.
The secret to making this work is to start small and make the additions
random and repeated. Only go at a rate at which 90 percent of the class can
repeat all the numbers. Once you get to that level, practice backward recall.
Over time, slowly build up the number chains. Based on my experience,
this takes five to ten minutes, three to five times a week, for eight to twelve
weeks, to show strong gains.
Number Manipulation
Here’s a great activity you can do with your students to help them add,
subtract, rearrange, group, multiply, divide, reverse, sequence, or compute
in ways that require holding the number and manipulating. At the K–5
level, you can use positive single-digit whole numbers. Say one number to a
student (“five”). The student then can add, subtract, multiply, or divide
using that number and another positive single-digit whole number (“five
minus three is two”). Keep this developmentally appropriate. Then, you
take the answer and do your own calculations. You might say, “Two times
four is eight.” Then, the student says, “Eight plus one is nine.” Then, you
say, “Nine divided by three is three.” Then, your partner says, “Three times
two is six.” When this is done with students in partners, it is great fun.
Your job is to keep the activity challenging. One way to do that is to
have a third student act as a mathematics coach. That student listens to the
students doing the mathematics and checks their work for accuracy. That
student can also say when it is time to change the functions or number sets.
At the secondary level, after a few weeks, the students can use positive,
double-digit whole numbers. The idea is simple: do hard mental work, keep
making it harder and more complex, get feedback on it, and have fun.
Doing times activities makes it even more fun since many students will feel
the fun competition.
Cadence Songs
Let’s double up on our enrichment. We know that brief walks are good
for our brain (Miller & Krizan, 2016; Schaefer, Lovden, Wieckhorst, &
Lindenberger, 2010). With that, we will combine a short-term memory
builder. Cadence songs are marching songs with a call-response format.
They build camaraderie, unity, and auditory short- and long-term memory.
At school, the student leader begins with a line, and the students repeat each
one. Teachers can use these for classroom self-discipline, chores, new
words, or character building. In the following example, a K–2 grade teacher
says each single line, and then students repeat it. Over time, the teacher can
start using two lines at a time.
Teachers can use an eight-line cadence song as a walking energizer or to
prepare for recess or lunch. Students begin this by standing in line, ready to
go. The K–2 teacher says the first line of the cadence, and then after each
line, the students repeat.
• “Let’s line up; it’s easy to do.” (Students have their heads up and
repeat.)
• “Hands at my side, all stuck like glue.” (Students snap hands to
sides and repeat.)
• “Feet together; it’s cool to see.” (Students look down and repeat.)
• “You watch you, and I watch me.” (Students look at teacher and
repeat.)
• “We can walk real fast; we’ve got a plan.” (Students walk fast and
repeat.)
• “We can walk so slow; oh yes we can.” (Students walk slow and
repeat.)
• “1, 2, 3, 4! We make sure we’re in a row.” (Students count and
repeat.)
• “Ready to go when the teacher says so.” (Students repeat.)
Cadence songs must start out simple and fun. Over time, you’ll be
asking more and more as the students develop a better short-term memory.
Simon Says
A classic short-term memory game is Simon Says. Typically, Simon
Says is a listening, attentional activity. The keys of this game are to keep it
fun, start simple, and build slowly. A female teacher can even use the name
Simone instead of Simon. Students are only to do something that Simon or
Simone says to do.
To build working memory, first ensure that students know the regular
format for Simon Says. Then, you’ll mix up the directions by giving two
commands at once or asking students to only follow the first of two
commands. These activities invite students to listen closely (attentional
skills) and hold words and actions in their heads (working memory
practice). For example, you could say, “This time, Simon says, ‘Follow the
first of the two commands.’” “Simon says, ‘Clap your hands.’” “Simon
says, ‘Stomp your feet.’” Students should only clap their hands and not
stomp their feet.
Call-Response Songs
Some songs repeat a brief chorus line (like “Day-O”). Repeating longer
segments builds memory skills. For younger students (grades K–2), use
songs that keep building onto the song’s lyrics (such as “Old MacDonald
Had a Farm”). These are excellent for younger students, since ideally,
students have to keep track of all the previous verses. Another classic is
“The Twelve Days of Christmas.”
Clapping Repeats
This activity requires no planning. In fact, the beauty is its simplicity.
The teacher starts with a very simple clap in front of the class: “Clap-clap,”
and students repeat it. The teacher repeats the clap: “Clap-clap” and, once
again, students repeat it. Next, the teacher starts a new one: “Clap-clap
(pause) clap-clap,” and students repeat it. The sequence is critical: the
teacher starts very easy, and then repeats the activity. Use the challenge to
boost motivation: “Last week we got to level three; let’s go for level four
this week.” The teacher builds up slowly, often doubling back to ensure the
skills are solid. With just a few minutes a day, any teacher can boost
listening skills and short-term memory. Over time, students can lead the
class in this activity as a privilege.
Repeat-After-Me Activities
A repeat-after-me activity goes this way. You say to your students,
“Today we are going to learn three ways that wind affects our weather. How
many ways did I just say?”
Give one to two sentences as initial directions to start a new task. Then,
say, “Now, turn to your neighbor and repeat the directions, in your own
words, as best as you can. Ready, go!”
Visual and Verbal Memory Quizzes
You say to students (who are in their usual cooperative groups or
teams), “Point to a neighbor in your group who was here yesterday. Now
tell him or her what colors he or she wore yesterday. Ready, go!”
You say to your students, “Yesterday, we posted our new vocabulary
word for the day. Go ahead, talk it over with your neighbor, define it, and
then write it down. As soon as you have it written, hold up your answer on
the paper. Let’s see what you got!”
Quick Consolidation
The enrichment mindset is an impressive approach for building your
students’ cognitive capacity. Cognitive strategies are so powerful that, by
working in grade-level or subject teams, each teacher can focus on different
areas at the secondary level. At the K–5 level, focus on building two new
cognitive skills at each grade level. By the fifth grade, the students will
truly be enriched. This was a full chapter, but then again, you were learning
a core cognitive component of academic achievement: memory. Long-term,
short-term, and working memory are critically important. We cannot in
good conscience expect, or even hope, that students will learn it unless we
stress the urgency and make it easy to implement. Short-term memory is
highly predictive of student achievement for complex activities including
language comprehension, problem solving, and learning (Engle, 2001), and
it’s strongly related to general intelligence (Conway, Kane, & Engle, 2003).
I urge you to give your students memory training. It’s that important. Now,
lock in on something from this chapter, and make it part of your lesson
plan. Your students are waiting for an amazing teacher to show up who will
help them feel smarter.
CHAPTER 13
This chapter ties up the strategies on enriching the brain. Far too many
teachers talk about what’s wrong with students and how their poor
upbringing makes them “less than” for life, but DNA is not destiny. The key
is to develop the enrichment mindset, which shows that all brains can grow,
including theirs.
Most of us deal with success pretty easily. We can internalize it and feel
great as we swell up with pride or socialize it and show off with a new
swagger. We may even dismiss success as an exception. But failure is more
important to deal with, since it will guide much of your life. When students
fail, how do you respond? Are you disappointed and find yourself looking
for blame? When students fail, do you immediately use that as a gift and
opportunity to grow? Do you model how to deal with mistakes in your
class, or do you avoid them at all costs? What is your narrative about
failure?
Make this year the story of how you develop your students, as would a
coach for his or her athletes. In this case, you’ll develop the capacity to
learn. Now, you have a choice to make: What will be your new alternative
and more empowering narrative to explain failure and foster positive
changes for the future?
Fill in the following blanks with your name and a strategy from this
mindset. Repeat the phrase daily until it’s automatic.
“I,__________, am committing to developing the enrichment mindset
with my students every single day. I will begin with one of the strategies
mentioned, which is ___________. I will continue this until I have mastery
and it’s automatic. At that point, I’ll learn something new to foster student
success.”
Quick Consolidation
At school, I often hear teachers describe “low” students. But their brains
are only responding to environmental input. Since the brain can change,
there are no low students, only students in low environments. As educators,
we get students for nine hundred hours a year and often spend more time
with them than their parents. We can change the brains of the next
generation to help it succeed.
Students with a growth mindset might say, “I can change and grow and
learn from my mistakes.” The growth mindset means that failures are an
opportunity to learn from mistakes and get better. It affirms the value of
effort, attitude, and improved strategy. It does not claim that everyone can
become an Einstein; merely that everyone has potential for growth. The
enrichment mindset can become a different way you think about students
from now on. Everything can be enriched: social skills, punctuality, respect,
vocabulary, and, of course, cognitive skills. This is an amazing moment in
your life when the burden of low expectations is suddenly invalid. You now
know that all students really can learn, as long as you are an ally.
The power of engaging the growth mindset is huge. Once you begin to
say, “What else can I enrich?” a whole new world of teaching opens up for
you. You can measure the strength of your enrichment mindset, not just in
what you say to your students but also in what you teach them. That process
speaks volumes and shows your students you believe in their potential. So,
while it is fresh on your mind, start thinking of some higher goals for your
students to reach this year (or semester).
PART THREE
WHY THE GRADUATION MINDSET?
CHAPTER 14
This chapter begins with my own personal mission for college and career
readiness standards. I am committed to helping 100 percent of K–12
students graduate job or college ready. When I share this mission with
others, some feel like kindred spirits and like my gutsy goal. But others
simply smile, and I suspect they silently say to themselves, “Right; like
that’s going to happen.” But who on your staff would say that? Are you a
teacher who subscribes to the deficit model, which suggests that the poor
will always struggle because they are “broken”? Actually, anyone who
thinks that way should know the facts. High-poverty schools can and do
succeed. It is often the staff’s mindset that is broken.
Before you can understand the thinking of a teacher with the graduation
mindset, it helps to contrast it with the opposite mindset. Teachers who
struggle in this area may say something like one or more of the following
statements. Ask yourself if you have occasionally heard these comments at
school.
How did you respond to this list? Did you think, “Those sound good,”
then just keep reading? High-poverty, high-performing schools consider
every option. They hold discussions, look at their data, listen to students via
student surveys, and are fanatic about patching any gaps that hurt students’
chances for graduation. The preceding items are solid-gold ideas that can
transform your school. Please circle them, tag this page, and talk about
them at your school. The following two chapters offer strategies to help
your students prepare for graduation—no matter what grade they’re in.
These strategies include the following.
Quick Consolidation
In the following chapters, you’ll begin a new narrative, one all about
reaching a school goal of 100 percent graduation. Remember, the
graduation mindset says, “Focus on what matters. Be an ally to help
students graduate college and career ready.” When this is your mindset,
heaven and earth will move for you. Why? Your intention is clear, and your
attention to the goal is focused and strong. You have the skills, and the
outcome can become real.
CHAPTER 15
Let’s start with a simple question: If you knew of a program that kept
students in school, reduced student discipline problems, strengthened
cognitive capacity, reduced dropouts, and improved graduation rates, would
you support it? Of course you would!
Now, let’s visit a pro-arts teacher to find out how much the arts matter
(Esquith, 2007).
An upper-elementary teacher in South Los Angeles, California, taught
at a high-poverty elementary school. The neighborhood was known more
for crime and non–English speakers than anything else. Over 70 percent of
his students were from poverty, and most were second language learners. If
you track the students from his entire elementary school, only 32 percent
graduate from high school. But if you track the students from his fifth-grade
class only, 100 percent graduate and go on to college. The primary vehicle
for his students’ success is the arts.
The students dance, learn how to play an instrument, and perform the
Shakespearean play As You Like It. The next time you think you can’t make
a difference, go to YouTube and type in “The Hobart Shakespeareans,” and
see his students perform. The arts are a huge difference maker, and they
change the brain in positive ways (Asbury & Rich, 2008).
There are multiple ways you can engage physical activity in the
classroom.
• Invite students to run in place for one minute. Once you begin,
students will get excited, especially if you encourage some friendly
competition or collaboration. Students who are extra active, bored,
or just need to release a little steam will find this is a jewel.
• Integrate movement with subject areas. For example, check out
activities at Action Based Learning
(http://actionbasedlearning.3dcartstores.com).
• Do whole-group activities that bring everyone together. For
example, allow a student to teach the class a dance step.
• Allow student volunteers to be leaders. Everyone follows as he or
she walks, marches, and dances around the classroom for forty-five
seconds.
• Play an imaginary sport. Students within a team all stand up, and
each picks a favorite sport. One at a time, that person goes through
the kinesthetic motions of that sport, while the other team members
mimic the motions for thirty seconds. Rotate to the next team
member, and everyone follows that student too. This is great fun
and goes quickly.
At the secondary level, students still need to move their bodies. This
means physical education is critical, but so are classroom activities that
allow students to move.
Quick Consolidation
This chapter was all about alternative ideas—the arts and physical
education. The graduation mindset casts a wide net across the landscape
and says, “Let’s leave no stone unturned.”
Enrich every student, every day to move him or her toward graduation.
Graduation is not an accident; it is a hard, long-term process that takes its
toll on students. When you provide the tools, hope, and relationships and go
above and beyond, the students will feel it. They will feel that graduation is
indeed that important. Once they are on board, success belongs to
everybody. Can I count on you?
CHAPTER 16
There have always been some students who struggle or fail in nearly every
area of school until they get to do something with their hands, participate in
something physical, or get outdoors and learn. Some students practically
live for these activities that may include vocational training, outdoor
learning, project-based work, field trips, apprentice learning, and service
learning. As a generalization, keep your younger students closer to school.
The novelty of outside experiences is more likely to overwhelm third-grade
students, depending on their previous at-home experiences. They’ll
remember the field trip but will likely learn less from it than if you just use
a simple outdoor science activity within the school grounds.
The more options students see, the better the likelihood that they’ll find
the right fit. What else can you do to help students graduate career or
college ready? The key here is to put yourself in your students’ shoes. What
will move them forward in life? What can you do immediately? How can
you best facilitate the process?
• College ready: Do they have the life skills to deal with college
life? Do they have solid study skills for each subject? Do they have
a mentor to contact for support? If a student does not get a
scholarship, here’s what to do. Remind your students that college
really can be free. The University of the People
(http://uopeople.edu) is an accredited and tuition-free college
(although there are some fees involved, such as $2,000 to $4,000
for tests).
• Career ready: Does every graduate have a resume? Does every
graduate have interviewing skills through constant practice and
feedback? Does each graduate have either a confirmed job or at
least five leads to follow up on? Does he or she have a mentor to
contact for support?
There are some great websites that may help students avoid uncertainty,
stress, or confusion about the college process. Work with students on
college help sites like the National Association for College Admission
Counseling (www.nacacnet.org/studentinfo/Pages) and YouCanGo!
(http://youcango.collegeboard.org). Remember, community colleges can be
a great stepping stone to either a job or a four-year degree elsewhere.
Quick Consolidation
This chapter was all about the graduation mindset. This is a powerful
mindset that says, “We will do whatever is necessary to help students
graduate.” Here we explored the career and technical education options. We
visited a school, which had students who were sent as so-called discipline
problems or even “bad boys.” However, the principal understood that
students simply wanted a school that gave them the only things they really
cared about—relationships with caring teachers, relevant curriculum, and
engaging classes. That’s all the students wanted. When the school
welcomed these elements, discipline problems vaporized, dreams were
built, and graduation became real. This is what it takes at your school too.
Can you take a step today toward that happening?
CHAPTER 17
The graduation mindset reminds you to use a filter in your work: “Is what I
am doing right now moving this student toward graduation (and to be job or
college ready)?” Highly effective teachers influence the narrative (their
story), both in their students’ lives and their own. The narrative is the
predicted story about how things will turn out. Every time you get
frustrated, get angry, or are tempted to back off, just pause. We all do these
things.
Remind yourself that you are your students’ best hope for a chance of
success in life. Without you, many will not succeed. Your students need you
at your best. You do not need to be perfect; just bring your best every day.
That’s the graduation mindset. Learn to focus on the rewards of your job.
Nobody is going to triple your pay overnight, but you can have a far more
rewarding job if you focus on the why.
Fill in the following blanks with your name and a strategy from this
mindset. Repeat the phrase daily until it’s automatic.
Quick Consolidation
Be positive, build cognitive capacity, and own the graduation mentality.
In classrooms, be the teacher who is confident and decisive, knowing the
future may be uncertain, but it will be good. There is typically a sense of
community among students and the teacher as they work toward a common
goal. Focus on what matters: be an ally to help students graduate job or
college ready. A teacher from a high-performing, high-poverty school
emailed me once to thank me for including her school in my book, Teaching
With Poverty in Mind. In her school, 100 percent of the students are from
poverty, yet over 95 percent every year go to college. Why does her school
succeed? “Our school simply won’t let you fail,” she said (M. Olivas,
personal communication, October 11, 2011). Take a moment, and let that
sink in.
If you’re still just a bit unsure of what strategies are right to use, go
ahead and turn to the appendices when you finish this chapter.
Appendix A
Rich lesson planning is critical. When your lesson plans are rich, they
include how you teach, not just what to teach. For example, in a lesson plan,
you might write a note to yourself, “Be sure to ensure students make their
own decisions on this—give them control!” or, your lesson plan says, “Stop
complaining; build the skills they don’t have!”
Let’s be honest: planning is work. Fortunately, it will pay off, and I’ll
show you how. I use a secondary lesson plan, but you can easily adapt it to
a K–5 unit. This chapter discusses the benefits of collaboration,
preassessment, relevance and buy-in, and attribution when planning lessons.
Collaboration
To develop high-powered lesson plans, work together in groups that fit
your needs; these may be grade-level teams or content-level teams. This
collaborative process is the key to success because you’ll be able to develop
common goals, language, and process for success. After developing goals
and objectives, the process works backward into the lesson to ensure all the
pieces are in play to get the outcome you want. Multiple studies show the
value of higher levels of teacher collaboration and peer learning (Johnson,
2010).
However, teacher collaboration guarantees nothing. Collaboration
works only when staff members focus on doing the right things well and
following a staff-established success pattern. Collaborating about the right
things, sharing ideas, solving problems, and planning lessons all support
student achievement. There needs to be a list of norms in the staff lounge of
how your staff run their meetings as well as how they accomplish their
goals. This is the time to focus on the goal and make every minute count in
your meeting time.
Set lofty goals for mastery learning. To develop a love of learning,
students will need to learn how to learn in satisfying ways. Some things in
life require only shallow learning. When students learn an address or phone
number for pizza delivery, it’s shallow learning. But when it comes to
classroom learning, we’d like deeper, mastery learning. That’s where
student satisfaction builds into a love of learning. Support this deeper
learning through big goals, and students will begin to love school.
Foster big challenges from big goals, and you can get big results. First,
match the big goals with the standards necessary for academic success. Big
goals would be: help every student graduate college or career ready. Next,
how do we do that? We meet or exceed the standards. Now, let’s ensure we
have content in our lesson plans that matches. That’s what staff
collaboration can help you do: match planning with the ultimate test
objectives. Post your team’s steps for turning school problems into
actionable solutions so you can easily replicate your prior successes. Check
out the following ten steps.
Preassessment
Deeper learning builds on basic skills and knowledge to gain expertise.
Before a unit of instruction, give your students a unit preassessment to
determine their level of background knowledge on the standards. Or you
can just give them a short-and-sweet assessment about a particular learning
objective to determine what you need to teach before a lesson. You need to
know which (if any) of the basic skills (or content) that your students
already know before you begin planning. As long as you provide the
resources, their brains love challenges, so let’s plan for them!
Naturally, you will begin by looking at student data. The data should tell
you your students’ current academic progress and appropriate targets. Be
sure to plan lessons with mastery as the benchmark, not proficiency or
compliance. First, ask yourself, “What will students need to know about
this standard? At what level of thinking do I want them to engage with that
standard? And how will they show it so their learning is visible?” The
lesson plans must be objective driven for deep understanding. The initial
objectives will, of course, include vocabulary and the subtitles and titles for
core labeling of understanding. These are your cognitive signposts for
knowledge clustering. But there’s more.
As an example, if students read a story, what would be the evidence that
they understand it? Should they create an outline, write a summary, or
complete a worksheet? That would constitute basic learning, not mastery.
It’s a good start, but you’ll want more. Students should ultimately be able to
create a personality profile of each character, make inferences about his or
her decisions in the story, and then quote passages that support their claims.
They should be able to talk about the plotlines, their value, and why the
author chose them. They should be able to assess the substance, value, and
significance of this particular literature (compared to similar stories).
In short, ensure that you include depth in your lesson planning. Students
will need to be able to analyze information critically, develop explanations
of the content, know alternative viewpoints, and explain concepts. They
should understand the core relationships within the learning and perform
related tasks such as writing about, building on, showing, or speaking about
the learning (Mehta & Fine, 2012).
To develop the mastery level, you’ll need to demonstrate the criteria for
the goals and products that you want to see. This means student exhibits,
objects, props, and student papers that show what the end product will look
like. Show exemplars, provide a checklist of criteria, and explain the
criteria line by line for a rubric. Describe the product’s features. Then, ask
students to summarize the key discriminating features of the end product to
confirm their understanding. Now, our next priority is getting our students
to care about the learning. Without this next section, most planning is
wasted.
Relevance and buy-in are powerful hooks to get students interested. But
a powerful teacher keeps the foot on the gas pedal. Attribution is the next
tool to ensure students get the maximum value out of every moment in
class. You’ll learn to make it a habit to give a reason why to nearly
everything you do.
Attribution
Attribution is the linking of one thing to another, as in cause and effect.
If you say, “You ran fast, Kelly,” that is a descriptive statement and maybe a
compliment. But if you said, “You ran fast, Kelly; did your change in diet
seem to help?” That is a link (attribution) where you linked the result
(running fast) to an earlier action (different nutrition plan). In a classroom,
you may say, “Eric, love your effort. That’s the kind of effort that will get
you higher-paid promotions once you get your first job.” Now, the student
understands the attribution: more effort might equal more money later on.
Remember the amazing power of attribution. You must continually
remind students that their success is tied to what they have already done or
what they will do (factors over which they have control, such as effort,
study time, and the use of appropriate strategies) and not tied to genes, luck,
or circumstance. A struggling student is likely to attribute his or her
weakness to a perceived low IQ, and he or she may withdraw effort when
the challenge is great. But if the student attributes his or her poor results to
lack of effort, then he or she may actually do something about it (Dweck,
1999). On a visceral level, this particular attribution must help the student
advance toward the goal of either college or vocation. Build this into your
lesson plans and sprinkle as needed to foster effort. You can say, “Erika, I
loved how you stayed with that term paper. That kind of effort and grit is
going to help you graduate from college.”
Students work harder at behaviorally relevant topics. Ask the students to
consider projects from a list including social justice, a better neighborhood,
better law enforcement, or less racism (Butler-Barnes, Williams, &
Chavous, 2012). You’ll need to get buy-in. This is key to helping students
want to achieve deeper learning.
Now that we have rolled out the starters, collaboration, preassessment,
relevance and buy-in, and attribution, it’s time to start locking down our
lesson plan. You might say to me, “Eric, that’s a lot of work!” Yes, you are
right. But once you have done this over and over, it will become embedded
in your brain. Soon, you’ll be doing all of this with no prompts at all. Your
memory of it will be stronger, but also you will have the positive feedback
of actually using it.
Planning Details
Steps
Before Class
Source: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School
Officers, 2010; NGSS Lead States, 2013.
Visit go.SolutionTree.com/instruction for a reproducible version of this table.
Many schools have district sites for developing lesson plans online. If
you already have a site for it, use it. If not, visit 10 Minute Lesson Plans
(www.10minutelessonplans.com). This free site will help you learn to
create effective lesson plans in just a few minutes.
Notice the lesson plan in table A.1 uses strategies from this book. Not a
bad start for a single class lesson. Of course, once you have taught a lesson
using the strategies in this book, you’ll start feeling more comfortable with
them. You’ll be ready for a couple of new strategies over time. As you
become a lifelong learner, your comfort with change will keep rising.
Because of this, your students will do well too. Don’t forget that there are
countless ways to accomplish the same objective. You can use the tools in
this book in ways that would make a lesson seem completely different. But
the core elements are the same. Here’s a true example from a high-
performing secondary mathematics teacher whose students typically
progressed two to three years for each year he taught (Soloveichik, 1979).
Before we begin, remember there is far more academic support for
structured, guided lessons than unguided learning in the classroom
(Kirschner, Sweller, & Clark, 2006). Here’s an example of structure and
choice blended in a high-performing secondary mathematics class. Victor
(who is now retired) was one of the most successful mathematics teachers
(based on student year-on-year progress) who ever taught (Soloveichik,
1979). We’ll look at the steps he took before and during class.
Before Class
For each class Victor created a one-page graphic outline of reference
signals (arrows, stars, and cartoons), key ideas, concise conclusions, and
selected extracts of schemas and examples plus connecting arrows, which
show relationships between ideas. He gave this key working document to
each student to start the semester. The mind map in figure A.1 (page 159) is
similar to Victor’s.
Source: © Daniel Tay, 2014. Used with permission.
During Class
For daily accountability, Victor asked each student to write out a key
understanding from the previous class in a graphic organizer. He wanted to
learn not just what his students got from yesterday’s lesson, but how they
understood it. Their mind map also showed relationships between items and
hierarchies. Students turned this in within ten minutes. While students were
completing these, Victor wrote on the board the new daily graphic
organizer, with missing pieces on it. (The gaps create curiosity.) Once the
students completed their written retrieval work, they turned it in.
Students were then asked to copy the new graphic organizer on their
paper. Victor collected them and sorted them quickly to identify any gaps in
student learning from the day before. Both the teacher and the students
completed their new task in the same amount of time. The students received
their papers and saw how they did. To score them, Victor used a number
from 1–5 (1 is low, and 5 is high). The teacher asked students with low
scores to rework their summary up front. His relationship with the class was
strong, and there was no blaming or snickering. The learning culture of the
class was “We all make mistakes, so let’s all learn from them.” Every
student was treated with dignity, so no student was embarrassed to rework
his or her assignment. It was important for the teacher to fix any mistakes
from yesterday before moving ahead into new material. In mathematics,
every day is critical. Victor coached them along to ensure accuracy. This
gave the students and Victor feedback on how well (or poorly) he taught
yesterday.
Then, he introduced new material to the whole class. Using the
schematic shown up front, he condensed new class knowledge, and then
detailed, again condensed, and again detailed in content pulses. The teacher
(and students) used color coding on the notes, with arrows and drawings to
show different values and properties of the content. He always supported
and never criticized students.
Victor’s class was always about understanding and memory. Students
used the notes to cue their memories. He based grades on the aggregate of
many weekly quizzes. His primary goal was to provide his students with the
confidence and skills to succeed. With confidence, students kept trying until
they got it. Homework was 100 percent optional. He gave his students 100
to 150 problems at the outset of the semester, and they could do any of them
at any time. Most did all of them. To me, some of this teacher’s strengths
are:
Action Steps
Many teachers do not do consistent lesson planning. The lesson plan has
to include not just what you are teaching, but what the students should be
doing and how you are teaching it. Most make the mistake of not putting
the student achievement and mindset boosters in the lesson plan to ramp up
results. Finally, most plan them collaboratively. You can be different.
Figure A.2 provides a checklist with the mindsets’ strategies throughout
the book. Use this refresher list to make some decisions. Which of these
items will be your starter steps?
Figure A.2: Checklist for changing mindsets.
Visit go.SolutionTree.com/instruction for a reproducible version of this figure.
Quick Consolidation
This chapter focuses on rich lesson planning. You may know the general
steps (check data, turn data into meaning, discuss concerns, break down the
meaning into actionable work, make learning goals, turn the work into
lesson plans, use quality feedback standards for all, establish
implementation goals, use frequent feedback from coaches or school
leaders, get feedback on instruction from colleagues or leaders watching
your lesson, and never stop improving). However, the real value in this
chapter is that powerful lesson plans include the process (collaboration,
preassessment, relevance and buy-in, and attribution). By integrating what
is really important in lesson planning, you can start getting the richer
teaching that I have invited you to enjoy. Teaching low-income students
well is hard work. The beauty of this process is that you now have, in your
hands, some powerful tools to make the magic happen. Are you going to be
the teacher students get changes their life? We all need you to be the richer
teacher this year. Can we all count on you?
Appendix B
Like most teachers, you don’t think about your brain every day because it is
so you that it is hard to stand back and reflect about something that is, well,
embedded in you. Yet, it absolutely runs the show. Everything in your life is
run by your brain. Earlier in the book, you were introduced to the positivity
mindset, the enrichment mindset, and, then, the graduation mindset. Now,
I’m going to give you the toolbox to use all the mindset tools effectively. It
focuses on who you think you are and what you can do about it. It is the
Running Your Own Brain toolbox.
Teacher Implications
So, how does meaning making play out in your quest to become a more
awesome teacher? Teacher narratives begin early in life. The experiences
you had as an elementary student shape your teaching and what you do at
work. As you go through the process to become a teacher, your classmates
influence the narrative in your head about what to expect. Once you start
teaching, your colleagues, books, conferences, district personnel, and
school leadership all contribute new narratives about teaching. Over time,
you amass a series of stories about how things should be, how things are,
and how things will be in the future.
This is why, in each chapter, I remind you that your narratives influence
your decision making. For example, what if you were considering switching
to another school and the buzz around your campus was that your favorite
administrator was leaving? What if an unpopular candidate were likely to
replace him or her? An uncertain future threatens the current narrative about
who will stay at the school (good times in the past). As a result of this new
narrative, you might give less effort. Alternatively, you might follow your
favorite administrator to a new school and hope the new school is better.
The narrative is already influencing your behaviors—for better or worse.
You can’t control everything, but you can control your response to
nearly everything. The narrative system asks, “What is causing what?” and
asks you, “Whose fault is it? What are you going to do?” Manage the story
in your head more proactively (after all, it’s you making up the story), and
you’ll manage your life.
It is counterproductive to allow other narratives that are negative,
hurtful, and toxic to become your narrative; life is short. Add those
narratives to your life, and soon things go downhill, unless, of course, you
can manage your life by learning to run your own brain. Here’s how you
can do it.
Action Steps
The world is simply full of narratives. You can create fresh life stories
about your decision making. If you can take on the new narratives, consider
the following two action steps.
1. Take on one new mindset each month. Write it down. Type it out.
Print copies to post at home (next to your bathroom mirror) and in
your classroom.
2. Ensure you read the new mindset twice a day. Once you read it,
affirm it. Say, “Now that’s me. That’s what I’m talking about.”
Teacher Implications
Teacher stress impacts moodiness and job satisfaction (Serrano, Moya-
Albiol, & Salvador, 2014). When you are relaxed and teach well, your body
and brain are proactive, and you make better decisions. When you feel
stressed, you’re being exposed to uncontrollable situations or people. You
become reactive and less thoughtful. Life changes can be stressful. Staff can
be stressful. Students can be stressful. Traffic and bills can be stressful.
Accountability with minimal time to plan and learn can be stressful.
Figure B.2: Your brain’s stress-response system.
Action Steps
Here are the optimal ways to reduce stress. First, start with this
affirmation every day: “There is no stress out there; I can manage my own
stress to become healthier and happier.” Second, stop the DATS (daily
annoying triggered self-talk) that brings you down. For example, don’t say
things to yourself like, “I don’t think she likes me. Maybe I shouldn’t sit
with her.” Change that internal dialogue to something neutral: “I’m unsure
of her. I think today, I’ll move along and enjoy the day.” Third, do what
makes you happy and helps you feel in control; feed your soul. Consider the
following activities: twelve-minute daily workouts, seven hours of sleep
every night, ten minutes of stretching or yoga every day, brief talks or
journal entries about your day, weekly gratitude sharing, and hobbies.
Fourth, develop coping tools, and use the mind-over-matter strategy: “Will
this stressor even matter a week from now?” Because if it won’t matter a
week from now, you might reconsider the frustration and energy you’re
expending now. Figure B.4 offers some strategies to rewire your brain’s
stress-response system.
Figure B.4: Stress-response system checklist.
Visit go.SolutionTree.com/instruction for a reproducible version of this figure.
Pick one to add to your rotating list of options or write it down for later.
Remember, take action to get control and redirect your attention to another,
less stressful task (McEwen, 2002). In short, as you master your stress-
response system, you’ll generate more joy, peace of mind, and energy. Now
you have the attitude and the strategy to release yourself from debilitating
stressors.
Action Steps
You’ll need to take seriously the notion of noticing, creating, and
accentuating the positives. This will not happen without your focus and
intention. What policies, practices, and procedures are in place to help
yourself and others notice and appreciate every single sign of progress in
your class? Unless you set up multiple systems for feedback and
acknowledgment, your class will have little or no positive energy and will
become a chore to teach.
In short, never let a chance to notice the good go to waste. You want to
use every opportunity you can to make your class awesome and help your
students on the path to graduation.
With these three systems in mind, you can run your own brain.
Final Consolidation
This whole book presents one major theme: no excuses. High-
performing schools progress without making any excuses; we see students
working hard and knowing they will succeed because the staff won’t let
them fail. Three mindsets are introduced, and any of them can move you
forward. On a final note, you might have noticed that this book is not just
quick teacher strategies. It is more than that. You are at a career crossroads.
You now know you can change, adapt, and grow, or you can wish and hope
that you’ll get a better batch of students next year.
If you have struggled to have high-performing students in the past, this
resource can help you get there. Why do I say that? I study high performers
for a living and share their mindsets and tools. I am inviting you to allow
this book’s process of learning, growing, and applying what you learn to
change you. In turn, the changes you make will change the students you
teach, so that they succeed.
We all know that your students may be difficult, frustrating, and
thoroughly a pain at times. But there is a lesson you can take from them.
Every student you have has the capacity to unleash an extraordinary passion
from within. If you want your students to succeed, you must connect with
them as individuals. Only then can you set loose the tidal wave of continual
effort. The way you will become highly effective in your job is by learning
how to connect deeply in ways the students can feel and hear every day.
When you do embrace the mindsets and action steps in this book, and
when you do unleash your new narratives, mindsets, and strategies, you can
expect a richer life beyond anything you’ve ever dreamed of. That’s a
promise. I know; I have done it. Now, I am hoping you’ll be looking
forward to every opportunity to help students succeed. Unfortunately, not
enough teachers have been doing that. But I think you are different. Are
you? Will you become a champion for students?
References and Resources
Aas, M., Henry, C., Andreassen, O. A., Bellivier, F., Melle, I., & Etain, B.
(2016). The role of childhood trauma in bipolar disorders. International
Journal of Bipolar Disorders, 4(1), 2.
Adler, A. D., Conklin, L. R., & Strunk, D. R. (2013). Quality of coping
skills predicts depressive symptom reactivity over repeated stressors.
Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 1228–1238.
Aikens, N. L., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading
trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school
contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 235–251.
Algina, J., & Olejnik, S. (2003). Conducting power analyses for ANOVA
and ANCOVA in between-subjects designs. Evaluation and the Health
Professions, 26(3), 288–314.
Algoe, S. B. (2012) Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in
everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6,
455–469.
Algoe, S. B., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2011). Emotional fitness and the
movement of affective science from lab to field. American Psychologist,
66(1), 35–42.
Algoe, S. B., Haidt, J., & Gable, S. L. (2008). Beyond reciprocity: Gratitude
and relationships in everyday life. Emotion, 8(3), 425–429.
Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles
of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20–29.
Amat, J., Paul, E., Zarza, C., Watkins, L. R., & Maier, S. F. (2006).
Previous experience with behavioral control over stress blocks the
behavioral and dorsal raphe nucleus activating effects of later
uncontrollable stress: Role of the ventral medial prefrontal cortex.
Journal of Neuroscience, 26(51), 13264–13272.
Amy Purdy. (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Accessed at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amy_Purdy on May 14, 2016.
Asbury, C., & Rich, B. (Eds.). (2008). Learning, arts, and the brain: The
Dana Consortium report on arts and cognition. New York: The Dana
Foundation. Accessed at
www.dana.org/uploadedFiles/News_and_Publications/Special_Publicatio
ns/Learning,%20Arts%20and%20the%20Brain_ArtsAndCognition_Com
pl.pdf on January 6, 2016.
Au, J., Sheehan, E., Tsai, N., Duncan, G. J., Buschkuehl, M., & Jaeggi, S.
M. (2015). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working
memory: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22(2),
366–377.
Bailey, T. C., Eng, W., Frisch, M. B., & Snyder, C. R. (2007). Hope and
optimism as related to life satisfaction. Journal of Positive Psychology,
2(3), 168–175.
Bankrate. (2012). Financial Security Index down slightly. Accessed at
www.bankrate.com/finance/consumer-index/financial-security-charts-
1112.aspx on January 6, 2016.
Baratta, M. V., Zarza, C. M., Gomez, D. M., Campeau, S., Watkins, L. R.,
& Maier, S. F. (2009). Selective activation of dorsal raphe nucleus-
projecting neurons in the ventral medial prefrontal cortex by controllable
stress. European Journal of Neuroscience, 30(6), 1111–1116.
Barbarin, O., Iruka, I. U., Harradine, C., Winn, D. M., McKinney, M. K., &
Taylor, L. C. (2013). Development of social-emotional competence in
boys of color: A cross-sectional cohort analysis from pre-K to second
grade. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(2), 145–155.
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002). When and where do we apply what we
learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612–
637.
Behnke, A. O., Piercy, K. W., & Diversi, M. (2004). Educational and
occupational aspirations of Latino youth and their parents. Hispanic
Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 26(1), 16–35.
Beierholm, U., Guitart-Masip, M., Economides, M., Chowdhury, R., Düzel,
E., Dolan, R., et al. (2013). Dopamine modulates reward-related vigor.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 38(8), 1495–1503.
Berger, M., & Sarnyai, Z. (2015). “More than skin deep”: Stress
neurobiology and mental health consequences of racial discrimination.
Stress, 18(1), 1–10.
Berger, J., Heinrichs, M., von Dawans, B., Way, B. M., & Chen, F. S.
(2016). Cortisol modulates men’s affiliative responses to acute social
stress. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63, 1–9.
Berghorst, L. H., Bogdan, R., Frank, M. J., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2013).
Acute stress selectively reduces reward sensitivity. Frontiers in Human
Neuroscience, 7(133), 1–15.
Berns, G. S., Blaine, K., Prietula, M. J., & Pye, B. E. (2013). Short- and
long-term effects of a novel on connectivity in the brain. Brain
Connectivity, 3(6), 590–600.
Best, J. R. (2010). Effects of physical activity on children’s executive
function: Contributions of experimental research on aerobic exercise.
Developmental Review, 30(4), 331–351.
Bezold, C. P., Konty, K. J., Day, S. E., Berger, M., Harr, L., Larkin, M., et
al. (2014). The effects of changes in physical fitness on academic
performance among New York City youth. Journal of Adolescent Health,
55(6), 774–781.
Biemiller, A. (2003). Vocabulary needed if children are to read well.
Reading Psychology, 24, 323–335.
Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying Hawthorn.
Camberwell, Victoria, Australia: Australian Council for Educational
Research.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit
theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent
transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development,
78(1), 246–263.
Blake, D. T., Heiser, M. A., Caywood, M., & Merzenich, M. M. (2006).
Experience-dependent adult cortical plasticity requires cognitive
association between sensation and reward. Neuron, 52(2), 371–381.
Blokland, G. A. M., McMahon, K. L., Thompson, P. M., Martin, N. G., de
Zubicaray, G. I., & Wright, M. J. (2011). Heritability of working memory
brain activation. Journal of Neuroscience, 31(30), 10882–10890.
Bogdan, R., & Pizzagalli, D. A. (2006). Acute stress reduces reward
responsiveness: Implications for depression. Biological Psychiatry,
60(10), 1147–1154.
Bolte, A., Goschkey, T., & Kuhl, J. (2003). Emotion and intuition: Effects
of positive and negative mood on implicit judgments of semantic
coherence. Psychological Science, 14(5), 416–421.
Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable
transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead. New York: Gotham
Books.
Brown, B. (2015). Rising strong. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
Brown, J., Cooper-Kuhn, C. M., Kempermann, G., van Praag, H., Winkler,
J., Gage, F. H., et al. (2003). Enriched environment and physical activity
stimulate hippocampal but not olfactory bulb neurogenesis. European
Journal of Neuroscience, 17(10), 2042–2046.
Bruininks, P., & Malle, B. F. (2005). Distinguishing hope from optimism
and related affective states. Motivation and Emotion, 29(4), 324–352.
Budde, H., Voelcker-Rehage, C., Pietrabyk-Kendziorra, S., Ribeiro, P., &
Tidow, G. (2008). Acute coordinative exercise improves attentional
performance in adolescents. Neuroscience Letters, 441(2), 219–223.
Bui, Q. (2015, February 5). Map: The most common* job in every state.
Planet Money: The Economy Explained. Accessed at
www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/02/05/382664837/map-the-most-
common-job-in-every-state on January 6, 2016.
Bull, R., Espy, K. A., & Wiebe, S. A. (2008). Short-term memory, working
memory, and executive functioning in preschoolers: Longitudinal
predictors of mathematical achievement at age 7 years. Developmental
Neuropsychology, 33(3), 205–228.
Butler-Barnes, S. T., Williams, T. T., & Chavous, T. M. (2012). Racial pride
and religiosity among African American boys: Implications for academic
motivation and achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(4),
486–498.
Caeyenberghs, K., Leemans, A., Heitger, M. H., Leunissen, I., Dhollander,
T., Sunaert, S., et al. (2012). Graph analysis of functional brain networks
for cognitive control of action in traumatic brain injury. Brain, 135(4),
1293–1307.
Canfield, J. (2015). The success principles: How to get from where you are
to where you want to be (10th anniv. ed.). New York: William Morrow.
Canfield, J., & Hansen, M. V. (2013). Chicken soup for the soul (20th anniv.
ed.). Cos Cob, CT: Chicken Soup for the Soul.
Carlson, S. A., Fulton, J. E., Lee, S. M., Maynard, L. M., Brown, D. R.,
Kohl, H. W., III., et al. (2008). Physical education and academic
achievement in elementary school: Data from the early childhood
longitudinal study. American Journal of Public Health, 98(4), 721–727.
Carter, S. C. (2001). No excuses: Lessons from 21 high-performing, high-
poverty schools. Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
Catalino, L. I., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2011). A Tuesday in the life of a
flourisher: The role of positive emotional reactivity in optimal mental
health. Emotion, 11(4), 938–950.
Catalino, L. I., Algoe, S. B., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2014). Prioritizing
positivity: an effective approach to pursuing happiness? Emotion, 14,
1155–1161.
Catterall, J. S., Chapleau, R., & Iwanaga, J. (1999). Involvement in the arts
and human development: General involvement and intensive
involvement in music and theater arts. In E. Fiske (Ed.), Champions of
change: The impact of the arts on learning (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC:
Arts Education Partnership.
Catterall, J. S. (2003). Research and assessment on the arts and learning:
Education policy implications of recent research on the arts and academic
and social development. Journal for Learning Through Music, 3(2003),
103–109.
Catterall, J. S. (2009). Doing well and doing good by doing art: The effects
of education in the visual and performing arts on the achievements and
values of young adults. Los Angeles: Imagination Group.
Catterall, J. S., Dumais, S. A., & Hampden-Thompson, G. (2012). The arts
and achievement in at-risk youth: Findings from four longitudinal studies
(Research Report No. 55). Washington, DC: National Endowment for the
Arts.
Ceci, S. J., & Williams, W. M. (1997). Schooling, intelligence, and income.
American Psychologist, 52(10), 1051–1058.
Center for Public Education. (2005). High-performing, high-poverty
schools: Research review. Accessed at
www.centerforpubliceducation.org/Main-Menu/Organizing-a-
school/High-performing-high-poverty-schools-At-a-glance-/High-
performing-high-poverty-schools-Research-review.html on May 18,
2016.
Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., &
Pashler, H. (2009). Optimizing distributed practice: Theoretical analysis
and practical implications. Experimental Psychology, 56(4), 236–246.
Chan, C. S., Rhodes, J. E., Howard, W. J., Lowe, S. R., Schwartz, S. E. O.,
& Herrera, C. (2013). Pathways of influence in school-based mentoring:
The mediating role of parent and teacher relationships. Journal of School
Psychology, 51(1), 129–142.
Clamp, M., Fry, B., Kamal, M., Xie, X., Cuff, J., Lin, M. F., et al. (2007).
Distinguishing protein-coding and noncoding genes in the human
genome. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 104(49), 19428–19433.
Coe, D. P., Peterson, T., Blair, C., Schutten, M. C., & Peddie, H. (2013).
Physical fitness, academic achievement, and socioeconomic status in
school-aged youth. Journal of School Health, 83(7), 500–507.
Cohler, B. J. (1980). Personal narrative and life course. In P. Baltes & O. G.
Brim Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 205–
241). New York: Academic Press.
Cohn, M. A., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2010). In search of durable positive
psychology interventions: Predictors and consequences of long-term
positive behavior change. Journal of Positive Psychology, 5(5), 355–366.
Cohn, M. A., Fredrickson, B. L., Brown, S. L., Mikels, J. A., & Conway, A.
M. (2009). Happiness unpacked: Positive emotions increase life
satisfaction by building resilience. Emotion, 9(3), 361–368.
Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory
capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive
Sciences, 7(12), 547–552.
Cook, S. W., Mitchell, Z., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2008). Gesturing makes
learning last. Cognition, 106(2), 1047–1058.
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory
capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science,
19(1), 51–57.
Crocker, R. (2015). Emotional testimonies: An ethnographic study of
emotional suffering related to migration from Mexico to Arizona.
Frontiers in Public Health, 3(177).
Crone, E. A., Wendelken, C., Donohue, S., van Leijenhorst, L., & Bunge, S.
A. (2006). Neurocognitive development of the ability to manipulate
information in working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences of the United States of America, 103(24), 9315–9320.
Davis, O. S., Butcher, L. M., Docherty, S. J., Meaburn, E. L., Curtis, C. J.
C., Simpson, M. A., et al. (2010). A three-stage genome-wide association
study of general cognitive ability: Hunting the small effects. Behavior
Genetics, 40(6), 759–767.
de Bono, E. (1999). Six thinking hats (Rev. and updated ed.). Boston: Back
Bay.
Delgado, M. R., Nearing, K. I., LeDoux, J. E., & Phelps, E. A. (2008).
Neural circuitry underlying the regulation of conditioned fear and its
relation to extinction. Neuron, 59(5), 829–838.
De Smedt, B., Janssen, R., Bouwens, K., Verschaffel, L., Boets, B., &
Ghesquière, P. (2009). Working memory and individual differences in
mathematics achievement: A longitudinal study from first grade to
second grade. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(2), 186–
201.
Disabato, D. J., Goodman, F. R., Kashdan, T. B., Short, J. L., & Jarden, A.
(2015). Different types of well-being?: A cross-cultural examination of
hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Psychological Assessment, 28, 471–
482.
Dolcos S., Hu, Y., Iordan, A. D., Moore, M., & Dolcos, F. (2016).
Optimism and the brain: trait optimism mediates the protective role of the
orbitofrontal cortex gray matter volume against anxiety. Social Cognitive
and Affective Neuroscience, 11, 263–271.
Dubois, L., Ohm Kyvik, K., Girard, M., Tatone-Tokuda, F., Pérusse, D.,
Hjelmborg, J., et al. (2012). Genetic and environmental contributions to
weight, height, and BMI from birth to 19 years of age: An international
study of over 12,000 twin pairs. PLOS ONE, 7(2).
Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Gollwitzer, A., & Oettingen, G. (2013).
From fantasy to action: Mental contrasting with implementation
intentions (MCII) improves academic performance in children. Social
Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 745–753.
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2009). Positive
predictors of teacher effectiveness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(6),
540–547.
Duyme, M., Dumaret, A.-C., & Tomkiewicz, S. (1999). How can we boost
IQs of “dull children”?: A late adoption study. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(15),
8790–8794.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality,
and development. Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindset: The new psychology of success—How we
can learn to fulfill our potential. New York: Ballantine.
Economic Policy Institute. (2014). Real median household income, all
households and working-age, 1979–2013 (2013 dollars). Accessed at
www.stateofworkingamerica.org/charts/real-median-household-income
on January 6, 2016.
Emmons, R. A. (2007). Thanks!: How the new science of gratitude can
make you happier. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Emmons, R. A., & Stern, R. (2013). Gratitude as a psychotherapeutic
intervention. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69, 846–855.
Engineer, N. D., Engineer, C. T., Reed, A. C., Pandya, P. K., Jakkamsetti,
V., Moucha, R., et al. (2012). Inverted-U function relating cortical
plasticity and task difficulty. Neuroscience, 205, 81–90.
Engle, R. W. (2001). What is working memory capacity? In H. L. Roediger
III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Suprenant (Eds.), The nature of
remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 297–314).
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Epel, E. S., Blackburn, E. H., Lin, J., Dhabhar, F. S., Adler, N. E., Morrow,
J. D., et al. (2004). Accelerated telomere shortening in response to life
stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United
States of America, 101(49), 17312–17315.
Eriksson, P. S., Perfilieva, E., Björk-Eriksson, T., Alborn, A. M., Nordborg,
C., Peterson, D. A., et al. (1998). Neurogenesis in the adult human
hippocampus. Nature Medicine, 4, 1313–1317.
Erickson, K. I., Voss, M. W., Prakash, R. S., Basak, C., Szabo, A.,
Chaddock, L., et al. (2011). Exercise training increases size of
hippocampus and improves memory. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(7), 3017–
3022.
Esquith, R. (2007). Teach like your hair’s on fire: The methods and madness
inside room. New York: Penguin Books.
Evans, G. W. (2003). A multimethodological analysis of cumulative risk
and allostatic load among rural children. Developmental Psychology,
39(5), 924–933.
Evans, G. W. (2004). The environment of childhood poverty. American
Psychologist, 59(2), 77–92.
Evans, G. W., & English, K. (2002). The environment of poverty: Multiple
stressor exposure, psychophysiological stress, and socioemotional
adjustment. Child Development, 73(4), 1238–1248.
Evans, G. W., & Kantrowitz, E. (2002). Socioeconomic status and health:
The potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annual Review of
Public Health, 23, 303–331.
Evans, G. W., & Kim, P. (2012). Childhood poverty and young adults’
allostatic load: the mediating role of childhood cumulative risk exposure.
Psychological Science, 23, 979–983.
Evans G. W., Fuller-Rowell, T. E. (2013). Childhood poverty, chronic
stress, and young adult working memory: the protective role of self-
regulatory capacity. Developmental Science, 16, 688–696.
Evans, G. W., & Schamberg, M. A. (2009). Childhood poverty, chronic
stress, and adult working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(16), 6545–6549.
Farah, M. J., Shera, D. M., Savage, J. H., Betancourt, L., Giannetta, J. M.,
Brodsky, N. L., et al. (2006). Childhood poverty: Specific associations
with neurocognitive development. Brain Research, 1110(1), 166–174.
Farr, S. (2010). Teaching as leadership: The highly effective teacher’s guide
to closing the achievement gap. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Ferguson, R. F. (1998). Can schools narrow the black-white test score gap?
In C. Jencks & M. Phillips (Eds.), The black-white test score gap (pp.
318–374). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A., & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in
language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months.
Developmental Science, 16(2), 234–248.
Flores, D., Lemons, A., & McTernan, H. (2011). The correlation between
student growth mindset and conceptual development in physics. Accessed
at http://modeling.asu.edu/modeling/Mindset&Physics-McT,L,F.pdf on
January 6, 2016.
Forgeard, M., Winner, E., Norton, A., & Schlaug, G. (2008). Practicing a
musical instrument in childhood is associated with enhanced verbal
ability and nonverbal reasoning. PloS One, 3(10), e3566.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Branigan, C. (2005). Positive emotions broaden the
scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and
Emotion, 19(3), 313–332.
Fredrickson, B. L., Grewen, K. M., Coffey, K. A., Algoe, S. B., Firestine,
A. M., Arevalo, J. M., et al. (2013). A functional genomic perspective on
human well-being. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of
the United States of America, 110(33), 13684–13689.
Fredrickson, B. L., & Losada, M. F. (2005). Positive affect and the complex
dynamics of human flourishing. American Psychologist, 60(7), 678–686.
Fredrickson, B. L., Tugade, M. M., Waugh, C. E., & Larkin, G. R. (2003).
What good are positive emotions in crises?: A prospective study of
resilience and emotions following the terrorist attacks on the United
States on September 11th, 2001. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 84(2), 365–376.
Froh, J. J., Sefick, W. J., & Emmons, R. A. (2008). Counting blessings in
early adolescents: An experimental study of gratitude and subjective
well-being. Journal of School Psychology, 46(2), 213–233.
Galatzer-Levy, R. M., & Cohler, B. J. (1993). The essential other: A
developmental psychology of the self. New York: Basic Books.
Gámez, P. B., & Lesaux, N. K. (2015). Early-adolescents’ reading
comprehension and the stability of the middle school classroom-language
environment. Developmental Psychology, 51(4), 447–458.
Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies:
Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60(4),
517–529.
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998). The mind’s past. Los Angeles: University of
California Press.
Ginsborg, J. (2006). The effects of socioeconomic status on children’s
language acquisition and use. In J. Clegg & J. Ginsborg (Eds.), Language
and social disadvantage: Theory Into practice (pp. 9–27). San Francisco:
Wiley.
Godfrey, K. M., Costello, P. M., & Lillycrop, K. A. (2015). The
developmental environment, epigenetic biomarkers and long-term health.
Journal of Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, 5, 399–406.
Goldin, A. P., Hermida, M. J., Shalom, D. E., Elias Costa, M., Lopez-
Rosenfeld, M., Segretin, M. S, et al. (2014). Far transfer to language and
math of a short software-based gaming intervention. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111,
6443–6448.
Goldin, P. R., McRae, K., Ramel, W., & Gross, J. J. (2008). The neural
bases of emotion regulation: Reappraisal and suppression of negative
emotion. Biological Psychiatry, 63(6), 577–586.
Gottfried, A. W., Gottfried, A. E., Bathurst, K., Guerin, D.W., & Parramore,
M. M. (2003). Socioeconomic status in children’s development and
family environment: Infancy through adolescence. In M. H. Bornstein &
R. H. Bradley (Eds.), Socioeconomic status, parenting, and child
development (pp. 189–207). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Governing. (2015). Bankrupt cities, municipalities list and map. Accessed
at www.governing.com/gov-data/municipal-cities-counties-bankruptcies-
and-defaults.html on January 14, 2016.
Grissom, J. B. (2005). Physical fitness and academic achievement. Journal
of Exercise Physiology, 8(1), 11–25.
Hackman, D. A., & Farah, M. J. (2009). Socioeconomic status and the
developing brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(2), 65–73.
Hafen, C. A., Allen, J. P., Mikami, A. Y., Gregory, A., Hamre, B., & Pianta,
R. C. (2012). The pivotal role of adolescent autonomy in secondary
school classrooms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 245–255.
Hammack, P. L., & Toolis, E. (2014). Narrative and the social construction
of adulthood. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development,
2014(145), 43–56.
Harrell, E., Langton, L., Berzofsky, M., Couzens, L., & Smiley-McDonald,
H. (2014). Household poverty and nonfatal violent victimization, 2008–
2012. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice
Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday
experience of young American children. Baltimore: Brookes.
Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word
gap by age 3. American Educator, 27, 4–9.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses
relating to achievement. New York: Routledge.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills
interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of
Educational Research, 66(2), 99–136.
Hawn, G. (2011). 10 mindful minutes: Giving our children—and ourselves
—the social and emotional skills to reduce stress and anxiety for
healthier, happier lives. New York: Penguin.
Headey, B., Muffels, R., & Wagner, G. G. (2010). Long-running German
panel survey shows that personal and economic choices, not just genes,
matter for happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
of the United States of America, 107(42), 17922–17926.
Heller, S., Pollack, H. A., Ander, R., & Ludwig, J. (2013). Preventing youth
violence and dropout: A randomized field experiment (Working Paper
No. 19014). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Accessed at www.nber.org/papers/w19014 on January 14, 2016.
Himmelstein, M. S., Young, D. M., Sanchez, D. T., & Jackson, J. S. (2015).
Vigilance in the discrimination-stress model for Black Americans.
Psychology and Health, 30(3), 253–267.
Ho, Y.-C., Cheung, M.-C., & Chan, A. S. (2003). Music training improves
verbal but not visual memory: Cross-sectional and longitudinal
explorations in children. Neuropsychology, 17(3), 439–450.
Holmes, J., Gathercole, S. E., Place, M., Dunning, D. L., Hilton, K. A., &
Elliott, J. G. (2010). Working memory deficits can be overcome: Impacts
of training and medication on working memory in children with ADHD.
Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(6), 827–836.
Honora, D. T. (2002). The relationship of gender and achievement to future
outlook among African American adolescents. Adolescence, 37(146),
301–316.
Hoy, W. K., Tarter, C. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2006). Academic optimism of
schools: A force for student achievement. American Educational
Research Journal, 43(3), 425–446.
Hughes, M. G., Day, E. A., Wang, X., Schuelke, M. J., Arsenault, M. L.,
Harkrider, L. N., et al. (2013). Learner-controlled practice difficulty in
the training of a complex task: Cognitive and motivational mechanisms.
Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(1), 80–98.
Hurlemann, R., Hawellek, B., Matusch, A., Kolsch, H., Wollersen, H.,
Madea, B., et al. (2005). Noradrenergic modulation of emotion-induced
forgetting and remembering. Journal of Neuroscience, 25(27), 6343–
6349.
Hyerle, D. (1996). Visual tools for constructing knowledge. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Illinois Public Health Institute. (2013). Enhancing P.E. in Illinois:
Naperville Central High School. Accessed at
http://iphionline.org/pdf/P.E._Case_Study_Naperville.pdf on January 14,
2016.
Irish, J. (2012). Crush Lusher: Investing students in something bigger than
themselves. Accessed at
http://tntp.org/assets/documents/TNTP_FishmanPrizeSeries_2012.pdf on
October 22, 2015.
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect
facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 52(6), 1122–1131.
Jensen, E. (n.d.). The “Bobby McFerrin effect” on your brain. Accessed at
www.jensenlearning.com/news/the-bobby-mcferrin-effect-on-your-
brain/bra on April 15, 2016.
Jensen, E. (2014). A descriptive study of differences between teachers at
high and low performing Title I elementary schools (UMI No. 3616282).
Santa Barbara, CA: Fielding Graduate University.
Jerald, C. D. (2001). Dispelling the myth revisited: Preliminary findings
from a nationwide analysis of “high-flying” schools. Washington, DC:
Education Trust.
Johnson, S. M. (2010). How best to add value?: Strike a balance between
the individual and the organization in school reform. Voices in Urban
Education, 27, 7–15.
Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus
and Giroux.
Kim, P., Evans, G. W., Angstadt, M., Ho, S. S., Sripada, C. S., Swain, J. E.,
et al. (2013). Effects of childhood poverty and chronic stress on emotion
regulatory brain function in adulthood. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(46), 18442–
18447.
Kim, P., Neuendorf, C., Bianco, H., & Evans, G. W. (2015). Exposure to
childhood poverty and mental health symptomatology in adolescence: A
role of coping strategies. Stress and Health. Accessed at
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/smi.2646/abstract on May 18,
2016.
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance
during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of
constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based
teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.
Klanker, M., Feenstra, M., & Denys, D. (2013). Dopaminergic control of
cognitive flexibility in humans and animals. Frontiers in Neuroscience,
7(201).
Knecht, S., Breitenstein, C., Bushuven, S., Wailke, S., Kamping, S., Flöel,
A., et al. (2004). Levodopa: Faster and better word learning in normal
humans. Annals of Neurology, 56(1), 20–26.
Krashen, S. (2002). Poverty has a powerful impact on educational
attainment, or, don’t trust Ed Trust. Chicago: Substance.
Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., & Keltner, D. (2009). Social class, sense of
control, and social explanation. Journal of Personality and Social
Psychology, 97(6), 992–1004.
Layous, K., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2014). The how, why, what, when, and
who of happiness: Mechanisms underlying the success of positive
activity interventions. In J. Gruber & J. T. Moskowitz (Eds.), Positive
emotion: Integrating the light sides and dark sides (pp. 473-495). New
York: Oxford University Press.
Layous, K., Nelson, S. K., Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., &
Lyubomirsky, S. (2012). Kindness counts: Prompting prosocial behavior
in preadolescents boosts peer acceptance and well-being. PLOS ONE,
7(12).
Lewis, G. J., Kanai, R., Rees, G., & Bates, T. C. (2014). Neural correlates
of the “good life”: Eudaimonic well-being is associated with insular
cortex volume. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(5), 615–
618.
Lewitus, G. M., & Schwartz, M. (2009). Behavioral immunization:
Immunity to self-antigens contributes to psychological stress resilience.
Molecular Psychiatry, 14, 532–536.
Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J.
H., & Way, B. M. (2007). Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling
disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological
Science, 18(5), 421–428.
Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014). Positive affect and cognitive control:
Approach-motivation intensity influences the balance between cognitive
flexibility and stability. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1116–1123.
London, R. A., & Castrechini, S. (2011). A longitudinal examination of the
link between youth physical fitness and academic achievement. Journal
of School Health, 81(7), 400–408.
Lyubomirsky, S., Sousa, L., & Dickerhoof, R. (2006). The costs and
benefits of writing, talking, and thinking about life’s triumphs and
defeats. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(4), 692–708.
Lyubomirsky, S., Dickerhoof, R., Boehm, J. K, Sheldon, K. M. (2011).
Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: an experimental
longitudinal intervention to boost well-being. Emotion, 11(2), 391–402.
Mackey, A. P., Whitaker, K. J., & Bunge, S. A. (2012). Experience-
dependent plasticity in white matter microstructure: Reasoning training
alters structural connectivity. Frontiers in Neuroanatomy, 6(32), 1–9.
Maier, S. F., & Watkins, L. R. (2005). Stressor controllability and learned
helplessness: the roles of the dorsal raphe nucleus, serotonin, and
corticotropin-releasing factor. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews,
29, 829–841
Marin-Burgin, A., & Schinder, A. F. (2012). Requirement of adult-born
neurons for hippocampus-dependent learning. Behavioural Brain
Research, 227(2), 391–399.
Marzano, R. J. (1998). A theory-based meta-analysis of research on
instruction. Aurora, CO: McREL. Accessed at
www.peecworks.org/peec/peec_research/I01795EFA.2/Marzano%20Instr
uction%20Meta_An.pdf on January 6, 2016.
Marzano, R. J. (2001). Classroom instruction that works: Research-based
strategies for increasing student achievement. Alexandria, VA:
Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Marzano, R. J., & Simms, J. A. (2013). Vocabulary for the Common Core.
Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research.
Marzano, R. J., & Simms, J. A. (2014). Questioning sequences in the
classroom. Bloomington, IN: Marzano Research.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological
Review, 50, 370–396.
Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational
Research, 59(1), 43–64.
Mazziotta, J. C., Woods, R., Iacoboni, M., Sicotte, N., Yaden, K., Tran, M.,
et al. (2009). The myth of the normal, average human brain—the ICBM
experience: (1) Subject screening and eligibility. Neuroimage, 44(3),
914–922.
McEwen, B. S. (2002). The end of stress as we know it. New York: Dana
Press.
McGaugh, J. L. (2013). Making lasting memories: Remembering the
significant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the
United States of America, 110(2), 10402–10407.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2013). Essential questions: Opening doors to
student understanding. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
Mehta, J., & Fine, S. (2012). Teaching differently … learning deeply. Phi
Delta Kappan, 94(2), 31–35.
Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training
effective?: A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49(2),
270–291.
Meneses, A., & Liy-Salmeron, G. (2012). Serotonin and emotion, learning
and memory. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 23(5–6), 543–553.
Milad, M. R., Wright, C. I., Orr, S. P., Pitman, R. K., Quirk, G. J., & Rauch,
S. L. (2007). Recall of fear extinction in humans activates the
ventromedial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in concert. Biological
Psychiatry, 62(5), 446–454.
Miller, G. (1956). Chunks: The magical number seven, plus or minus two:
Some limits on our capacity for processing information. The
Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.
Miller, C. A., & Sweatt, J. D. (2007). Covalent modification of DNA
regulates memory formation. Neuron, 53(6), 857–869.
Miller, J. C., & Krizan, Z. (2016). Walking facilitates positive affect (even
when expecting the opposite). Emotion.
Miller-Lewis, L. R., Sawyer, A. C., Searle, A. K., Mittinty, M. N., Sawyer,
M. G., & Lynch, J. W. (2014). Student-teacher relationship trajectories
and mental health problems in young children. BMC Psychology, 12, 27.
Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., & Maczuga, S. (2009). Risk
factors for learning-related behavior problems at 24 months of age:
Population-based estimates. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology,
37(3), 401–413.
Muncer, S. J., & Knight, D. (2011). The syllable effect in anagram solution:
unrecognized evidence from past studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic
Research, 40, 111–118.
Mueller, C. M., & Dweck, C. S. (1998). Praise for intelligence can
undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 33–52.
Murty, V. P., DuBrow, S., & Davachi, L. (2015). The simple act of choosing
influences declarative memory. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(16), 6255–
6264.
Nagel, D. (2006). Music in education: Study finds link with attendance and
graduation rates. Accessed at
https://thejournal.com/articles/2006/11/06/music-in-education-study-
finds-link-with-attendance-and-graduation-rates.aspx on July 5, 2016.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of
Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for
English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and
technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Accessed at
www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf on
February 25, 2016.
Nelson, P. M., Demers, J. A., & Christ, T. J. (2014). The responsive
environmental assessment for classroom teaching (REACT): The
dimensionality of student perceptions of the instructional environment.
School Psychology Quarterly, 29,182–197.
Nicholls, J. G., & Miller, A. T. (1984). Reasoning about the ability of self
and others: A developmental study. Child Development, 55, 1990–1999.
The New Teacher Project. (2013). Josalyn Tresvant. Accessed at
http://tntp.org/fishman-prize/winners/fishman-prize-2013/josalyn-
tresvant on May 31, 2016.
Nesbitt, R. E. (2009). Intelligence and how to get it: Why schools and
cultures count. New York: Norton.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states,
by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Noble, K. G., Norman, M. F., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Neurocognitive
correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children.
Developmental Science, 8(1), 74–87.
Noble, K. G., Tottenham, N., & Casey, B. J. (2005). Neuroscience
perspectives on disparities in school readiness and cognitive
achievement. Future of Children, 15(1), 71–89.
NPR, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, & Harvard School of Public
Health. (2013). Education and health in schools: A survey of parents.
Summary. Accessed at
www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/surveys_and_polls/2013/rwjf407
960 on June 2, 2016.
Oberle, E., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Thomson, K. C. (2010).
Understanding the link between social and emotional well-being and peer
relations in early adolescence: Gender-specific predictors of peer
acceptance. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39(11), 1330–1342.
Ohira, K., Takeuchi, R., Shoji, H., & Miyakawa, T. (2013). Fluoxetine-
induced cortical adult neurogenesis. Neuropsychopharmacology, 38(6),
909–920.
O’Keefe, P. A., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2014). The role of interest in
optimizing performance and self-regulation. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 53, 70–78.
Online College. (2012, June 27). 12 reasons community service should be
required in schools. Accessed at www.onlinecollege.org/2012/06/27/12-
reasons-community-service-should-be-required-schools on May 27,
2016.
Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative
studies: Applications, interpretations, and limitations. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 25(3), 241–286.
O’Rourke, N., Haimovitz, K., Ballweber, C., Dweck, C. S., & Popovic, Z.
(2014). Brain points: A growth mindset incentive structure boosts
persistence in an educational game. Proceedings of the ACM Conference
on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2014), Toronto.
Otake, K., Shimai, S., Tanaka-Matsumi, J., Otsui, K., & Fredrickson, B. L.
(2006). Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting
kindnesses intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 361–375.
Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2014). On being
grateful and kind: Results of two randomized controlled trials on study-
related emotions and academic engagement. Journal of Health
Psychology, 148(1), 37–60.
Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first
grade: The importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and
instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and
Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111–140.
Parrett, W. H., & Budge, K. M. (2012). Turning high-poverty schools into
high-performing schools. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision
and Curriculum Development.
Parsad, B., & Spiegelman, M. (2012). Arts education in public elementary
and secondary schools: 1999–2000 and 2009–2010. Accessed
http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2012/2012014rev. pdf on June 2, 2016.
Passolunghi, M. C., Vercelloni, B., & Schadee, H. (2007). The precursors of
mathematics learning: Working memory, phonological ability and
numerical competence. Cognitive Development, 22(2), 165–184.
Pereira, A. C., Huddleston, D. E., Brickman, A. M., Sosunov, A. A., Hen,
R., McKhann, G. M., et al. (2007). An in vivo correlate of exercise-
induced neurogenesis in the adult dentate gyrus. Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(13),
5638–5643.
Petty, G. (2009). Evidence-based teaching: A practical approach.
Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Nelson Thornes.
Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources
when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34, 602–619.
Pew Research Center. (2016). America’s shrinking middle class: A close
look at changes within metropolitan areas. Accessed at
www.pewsocialtrends.org/2016/05/11/americas-shrinking-middle-class-
a-close-look-at-changes-within-metropolitan-areas on May 18, 2016.
Plomin, R., Haworth, C. M., & Davis, O. S. (2009). Common disorders are
quantitative traits. Nature Reviews Genetics, 10(12), 872–878.
Pratt, L. A., & Brody, D. J. (2014). NCHS data brief: Depression in the U.S.
household population, 2009–2012 (No. 172). Hyattsville, MD: National
Center for Health Statistics.
Priest, N., Paradies, Y., Trenerry, B., Truong, M., Karlsen, S., & Kelly, Y.
(2013). A systematic review of studies examining the relationship
between reported racism and health and wellbeing for children and young
people. Social Science and Medicine, 95, 115–127.
Rank, M. R., & Hirschl, T. A. (2015). The likelihood of experiencing
relative poverty over the life course. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133513.
Ratey, J. J. (2008). Spark: The revolutionary new science of exercise and
the brain. New York: Little, Brown.
Rattan, A., Savani, K., Chugh, D., & Dweck, C. S. (2015). Leveraging
mindsets to promote academic achievement: policy recommendations.
Perspective Psychology Science, 10, 721–726.
Rauner, R. R., Walters, R. W., Avery, M., & Wanser, T. J. (2013) Evidence
that aerobic fitness is more salient than weight status in predicting
standardized math and reading outcomes in fourth- through eighth-grade
students. Journal of Pediatrics, 163(2), 344–348.
Raver, C. C., Blair, C., & Willoughby, M. (2013). Poverty as a predictor of
4-year-olds’ executive function: New perspectives on models of
differential susceptibility. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 292–304.
Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). The role of content and abstract
information in analogical transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 381–
400.
Ritchhart, R., Church, M., & Morrison, K. (2011). Making thinking visible:
How to promote engagement, understanding, and independence for all
learners. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Robertson-Kraft, C., & Duckworth, A. L. (2014). True grit: Trait-level
perseverance and passion for long-term goals predicts effectiveness and
retention among novice teachers. Teachers College Record, 116(3), 1–27.
Roediger, H. L., III, Agarwal, P. K., McDaniel, M. A., & McDermott, K. B.
(2011). Test-enhanced learning in the classroom: Long-term
improvements from quizzing. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied, 17(4), 382–395.
Rowe, G., Hirsh, J. B., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Positive affect increases
the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(1), 383–388.
Ruhl, K. L., Hughes, C. A., & Schloss, P. J. (1987). Using the pause
procedure to enhance lecture recall. Teacher Education and Special
Education, 10, 14–18.
Russell, I. J., Hendricson, W. D., & Herbert, R. J. (1984). Effects of lecture
information density on medical student achievement. Journal of Medical
Education, 59(11), 881–889.
Russo, N. M., Hornickel, H., Nicol, T., Zecker, S., & Kraus, N. (2010).
Biological changes in auditory function following training in children
with autism spectrum disorders. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 6(60),
1–8.
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Self-realization and meaning making in the face of
adversity: A eudaimonic approach to human resilience. South African
Journal of Psychology, 24, 1–12.
Sartori, G., Lombardi, L., & Mattiuzzi, L. (2005). Semantic relevance best
predicts normal and abnormal name retrieval. Neuropsychologia, 43(5),
754–770.
Schaefer, S., Lovden, M., Wieckhorst, B., & Lindenberger, U. (2010).
Cognitive performance is improved while walking: Differences in
cognitive-sensorimotor couplings between children and young adults.
European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 7, 371–389
Scheffer, B. K., & Rubenfeld, M. G. (2001). Critical thinking: What is it
and how do we teach it? In J. M. Dochterman & H. K. Grace (Eds.),
Current issues in nursing (6th ed.; pp. 352–359). St. Louis, MO: Mosby.
Schellenberg, E. G. (2004). Music lessons enhance IQ. Psychological
Science, 15(8), 511–514.
Schoenthaler, S. J., Bier, I. D., Young, K., Nichols, D., & Jansenns, S.
(2000). The effect of vitamin-mineral supplementation on the intelligence
of American schoolchildren: A randomized, double-blind placebo-
controlled trial. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine,
6(1), 19–29.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., Berkeley, S., & Graetz, J. E. (2010). Do
special education interventions improve learning of secondary content?:
A meta-analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 31(6), 437–449.
Segretin, M. S., Lipina, S. J., Hermida, M. J., Sheffield, T. D., Nelson, J.
M., Espy, K. A., et al. (2014). Predictors of cognitive enhancement after
training in preschoolers from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds.
Frontiers in Psychology, 5(205).
Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Learned optimism: How to change your mind
and your life. New York: Vintage.
Serrano, M. A., Moya-Albiol, L., & Salvador, A. (2014). Endocrine and
mood responses to two working days in female teachers. Spanish Journal
of Psychology, 17(e25), 1–11.
Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E.
(2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension.
Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232–246.
ShadowStats.com. (2016). Alternate inflation charts. Accessed at
www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/inflation-charts on January 6,
2016.
Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S., & Shafir, E. (2014). Some consequences of
having too little. Science, 338, 682–685.
Sharot, T., Shiner, T., Brown, A. C., Fan, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2009).
Dopamine enhances expectation of pleasure in humans. Current Biology,
19(24), 2077–2080.
Sheldon, K. M., & Lyubomirsky, S. (2006). How to increase and sustain
positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best
possible selves. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 73–82.
Shellshear, L., MacDonald, A. D., Mahoney, J., Finch, E., McMahon, K.,
Silburn, P., et al. (2015). Levodopa enhances explicit new-word learning
in healthy adults: A preliminary study. Human Psychopharmacology:
Clinical and Experimental, 30(5), 341–349.
Shinaver C. S., III, Entwistle, P. C., & Söderqvist S. (2014). Cogmed WM
training: Reviewing the reviews. Applied Neuropsychological Child, 3,
163–172.
Shors, T. J., Olson, R. L., Bates, M. E., Selby, E. A., & Alderman, B. L.
(2014). Mental and physical (MAP) training: A neurogenesis-inspired
intervention that enhances health in humans. Neurobiology of Learning
and Memory, 115, 3–9.
Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2005). Children’s thinking (4th ed.). Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Singh, M., & Singh, G. (2005). Assessment of mental health status of
middle-aged female school teachers of Varanasi city. Internet Journal of
Health, 5(1), 1–10.
Skeels, H. M. (1966). Adult status of children with contrasting early
experience: a follow-up study. Monographs of the Society for Research in
Child Development, 31, 1–65
Skoe, E., & Kraus, N. (2012). A little goes a long way: How the adult brain
is shaped by musical training in childhood. The Journal of Neuroscience,
3(34), 11507–11510.
Social Security Online. (2016). Wage statistics for 2014. Accessed at
www.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/netcomp.cgi?year=2014 on January 6, 2016.
Söderqvist, S., & Nutley, S. B. (2015). Working memory training is
associated with long term attainments in math and reading. Frontiers in
Psychology, 10, 1711.
Soloveichik, S. (1979, May). Odd way to teach, but it works. Soviet Life
Magazine, 5, 18–22.
Southgate, D. E., & Roscigno, V. J. (2009). The impact of music on
childhood and adolescent achievement. Social Science Quarterly, 90(1),
4–21.
Spilt, J. L., Koomen, H. M., & Harrison, L. J. (2015). Language
development in the early school years: The importance of close
relationships with teachers. Developmental Psychology, 51(2), 185–196.
Sripada, R. K., Swain, J. E., Evans, G. W., Welsh, R. C., & Liberzon, I.
(2014). Childhood poverty and stress reactivity are associated with
aberrant functional connectivity in default mode network.
Neuropsychopharmacology, 39(9), 2244–2251.
Standley, J. M. (2008). Does music instruction help children learn to read?
Evidence of a meta-analysis. Update: Applications of Research in Music
Education, 27, 17–32.
Steptoe, A., Wardle, J., & Marmot, M. (2005). Positive affect and health-
related neuroendocrine, cardiovascular, and inflammatory processes.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of
America, 102(18), 6508–6512.
Swanson, C. B. (2009). Cities in crisis 2009: Closing the graduation gap—
Educational and economic conditions in America’s largest cities.
Bethesda, MD: Editorial Projects in Education. Accessed at
www.edweek.org/media/cities_in_crisis_2009.pdf on January 13, 2016.
Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive
architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review,
10(3), 251–296.
Suitts, S. (2015). A new majority research bulletin: Low income students
now a majority in the nation’s public schools. Atlanta, GA: Southern
Education Foundation. Accessed at www.southerneducation.org/Our-
Strategies/Research-and-Publications/New-Majority-Diverse-Majority-
Report-Series/A-New-Majority-2015-Update-Low-Income-Students-
Now.aspx on January 6, 2016.
Telzer, E. H., Fuligni, A. J., Lieberman, M. D., & Galván, A. (2014). Neural
sensitivity to eudaimonic and hedonic rewards differentially predict
adolescent depressive symptoms over time. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(18), 6600–
6605.
Toga, A. (2005, October 15). Keynote address at the Learning Brain EXPO
in Newport Beach, CA.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the
needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for
Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tucker-Drob, E. M., Rhemtulla, M., Harden, K. P., Turkheimer, E., & Fask,
D. (2011). Emergence of a Gene X socioeconomic status interaction on
infant mental ability between 10 months and 2 years. Psychological
Science, 22, 125–133.
Ullman, S. E., Townsend, S., Filipas, H. H., & Starzynski, L. L. (2007).
Structural models of the relations of assault severity, social support,
avoidance coping, self-blame, and PTSD among sexual assault survivors.
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(1), 23–37.
Urban Prep Academies. (2016). Urban Prep announces 100% of seniors
admitted to college and launch of “10andchange” campaign to refocus
the narrative of black boys/young men on positive stories. Accessed at
www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/urban-prep-announces-100-of-
seniors-admitted-to-college-and-launch-of-10andchange-campaign-to-
refocus-the-narrative-of-black-boysyoung-men-on-positive-stories-
300237717.html on June 2, 2016.
U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Survey of income and program participation.
Accessed at www.census.gov/programs-surveys/sipp.html on January 6,
2016.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2011). More young adults are living in their parents’
home, Census Bureau reports [Press release]. Accessed at
www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/families_households/cb11-
183.html on January 6, 2016.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service. (2016).
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program participation and costs.
Accessed at www.fns.usda.gov/sites/default/files/pd/SNAPsummary.pdf
January 6, 2016.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). The
employment situation—December 2015 [Press release]. Accessed at
www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/empsit.pdf on January 14, 2016.
U.S. News & World Report. (2016). High schools: Preuss School UCSD.
Accessed www.usnews.com/education/best-high-
schools/california/districts/san-diego-unified-school-district/preuss-
school-ucsd-3216 on June 1, 2016.
Vacha-Haase, T., & Thompson, B. (2004). How to estimate and interpret
various effect sizes. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 51(4), 473–481.
van Gelder, T. (2004). Using argument mapping to improve critical thinking
skills. Accessed at www.reasoninglab.com/wp-
content/uploads/2013/10/TvG-Using-argument-mapping-to-improve-
critical-thinking-skills-2015.pdf on May 18, 2016.
van Gelder, T., Bissett, M., & Cumming, G. (2004). Cultivating expertise in
informal reasoning. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology,
58(2), 142–152.
van Holstein, M., Aarts, E., van der Schaaf, M. E., Geurts, D. E., Verkes, R.
J., Franke, B., et al. (2011). Human cognitive flexibility depends on
dopamine D2 receptor signaling. Psychopharmacology, 218(3), 567–578.
van Praag, H., Fleshner, M., Schwartz, M. W., & Mattson, M. P. (2014).
Exercise, energy intake, glucose homeostasis, and the brain. Journal of
Neuroscience, 34(46), 15139–15149.
Vargas Lascano, D. I., Galambos, N. L., Krahn, H. J., & Lachman, M. E.
(2015). Growth in perceived control across 25 years from the late teens to
midlife: The role of personal and parents’ education. Developmental
Psychology, 51(1), 124–135.
Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Fowler, J. S., Telang, F., Maynard, L., Logan,
J., et al. (2004). Evidence that methylphenidate enhances the saliency of
a mathematical task by increasing dopamine in the human brain.
American Journal of Psychiatry, 161(7), 1173–1180.
Voss, J. L., Gonsalves, B. D., Federmeier, K. D., Tranel, D., & Cohen, N. J.
(2011). Hippocampal brain-network coordination during volitional
exploratory behavior enhances learning. Nature Neuroscience, 14(1),
115–120.
Wegner, M., Schüler, J., & Budde, H. (2014). The implicit affiliation motive
moderates cortisol responses to acute psychosocial stress in high school
students. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 48, 162–168.
Willingham, D. T. (2008, Summer). Critical thinking: Why is it so hard to
teach? American Educator, 109, 21–29.
Winn, W. (2003). Research methods and types of evidence for research in
educational technology. Educational Psychology Review, 15(4), 367–373.
Winter, B., Breitenstein, C., Mooren, F. C., Voelker, K., Fobker, M.,
Lechtermann, A., et al. (2007). High impact running improves learning.
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 87(4), 597–609.
World Memory Sports Council. (2015). World Memory Championships
2015: Names and faces result. Accessed at
www.worldmemorychampionships.com/wp-
content/uploads/2015/12/WMC-2015-Full-Scores.pdf on May 14, 2016.
Yamashita, A. (2015). Mindfulness for beginners: A practical guide to
awakening and finding inner peace in your life! Seattle, WA:
CreateSpace.
Yau, S. Y., Li, A., Xu, A., & So, K.-F. (2015). Fat cell-secreted adiponectin
mediates physical exercise-induced hippocampal neurogenesis: An
alternative anti-depressive treatment? Neural Regeneration Research,
10(1), 7–9.
Yehuda, R., Flory, J. D., Southwick, S., & Charney, D. S. (2006).
Developing an agenda for translational studies of resilience and
vulnerability following trauma exposure. Annals of the New York
Academy of Sciences, 1071, 379–396.
Zak, P. J. (2015, February). Why inspiring stories make us react: The
neuroscience of narrative. Cerebrum. Accessed at
www.dana.org/Cerebrum/2015/Why_Inspiring_Stories_Make_Us_React
__The_Neuroscience_of_Narrative/ on January 13, 2016.
Zepeda, C. D., Richey, J. E., Ronevich, P., & Nokes-Malach, T. J. (2015).
Direct instruction of metacognition benefits adolescent science learning,
transfer, and motivation: An in vivo study. Journal of Educational
Psychology, 107(4), 954–970.
Index
The index that appeared in the print version of this title was intentionally
removed from the eBook. Please use the search function on your eReading
device to search for terms of interest. For your reference, the terms that
appear in the print index are listed below.
A
abbreviations
academic operating system
acronyms
Action Based Learning
acts of kindness
addiction
add-on activities
affirmations, giving daily
Altucher, J.
anagrams
argument mapping
arguments, forming effective
arts, reasons for supporting the
attitudes. See positive attitudes, building
attribution theory
B
behavioral immunization
Better Than College: How to Build a Successful Life Without a Four-Year Degree (Boles)
bipolar disorder
Boles, B.
brain
fixed versus malleable
impact of positivity on the
meaning-making narrative system
physical activity and formation of new cells in the
reward system
running your own brain
stress-response system
BrainHQ
bullying
C
cadence songs
call-response songs
Canfield, J.
capture
career readiness
cause, finding a
C8 Sciences
Center for Public Education
choice
compliance versus
filter
See also control, choice, and relevancy
chunking
Church, M.
clapping repeats
class jobs
classroom directory, creating a
cognitive control
cognitive differences, poverty and
cognitive functions, effect sizes
cognitive load
activities
chunking
defined
emotionally safe classrooms
interferences
issues, tools to reduce
learning, spacing
managing
pausing while teaching
physically safe classrooms
relevancy, spacing
retrieval, tools to strengthen
Cohler, B.
college and career readiness
community service
compliance, choice versus
conflicts, handling
constructs, deconstructing
content
gesturing key concepts
spacing
control, choice, and relevancy
class jobs
compliance versus choice
evidence for
examples of
quick writes
self-assessments
social activities and projects
strategies for
suggestions box
critical thinking
See also thinking skills
D
de Bono, E.
deconstruct constructs
distributed practice
dopamine
dosomething.org
dreams, encouraging
Dweck, C.
E
Education Trust
effect sizes
argument mapping
cognitive ability
cognitive functions
defined
mnemonics
reasoning skills
spaced learning
study aids
visual organizers
vocabulary skills
working memory
emotional bank account
emotionally safe classrooms
emotional set point
defined
evidence behind
how to change students’
emotions, long-term memory and
employment, changes in
Enchanted Learning
end product, focusing on
enrichment mindset
changing to
cognitive load, managing
memory, building better
statements
study skills and vocabulary, enhancing
summary
thinking skills, developing
epigenetics
eudaimonic happiness
executive functions
F
failure, understanding
feedback
Fitzgerald, R.
fixed mindset
40 Alternatives to College (Altucher)
G
goal setting
graduation mindset
arts, reasons for supporting the
college and career readiness
description of
physical activities, reasons for support
resources
summary
graduation rates
gratitude
Green Book of Songs
growth mindset
H
happiness, responses to and types of
hedonic happiness
hope
affirmations of
building
difference between optimism and
Hyerle, D.
I
invisible teaching velocity
J
jobs
assigning real-world
class
Jungle Memory
K
Katie’s Krops
L
language development
poverty and effects on
teaching the language of thinking
learning
recalling (retrieval)
spacing
lesson planning
attribution
collaboration
example
preassessment
relevance and buy-in
listening without judgment
long-term memory
acronyms, abbreviations, and anagrams
building
choice and control and
emotions, use of
mnemonics
music
poverty and effects on
M
Magic Three strategy
Making Thinking Visible: How to Promote Engagement, Understanding, and Independence for All
Learners (Ritchhart, Church, and Morrison)
meaningful projects
meaning-making narrative system
memory
building better
See also long-term memory; short-term memory; working memory
Miller, A. T.
Miller, G.
mindset
checklist
defined
See also type of
Minuteman High School
mnemonics
Morrison, K.
motor skills, relationship between academic skills and
music
long-term memory and
reasons for supporting the use of
N
name games
National Association for College Admission Counseling
negative expression, alternatives to
negativity, handling
new normal
evidence of
what it means for teachers
Nicholls, A. T.
noradrenaline
number manipulation
number strings
O
optimism
difference between hope and
modeling
teaching
P
Parent/Teacher Home Visit Project
perceived control
personal responsibility
perspective, teaching
physical activities, reasons for support
physically safe classrooms
Plomin, R.
positive attitudes, building
gratitude
personal responsibility and self-regulation
service work and acts of kindness
positivity mindset
brain and impact of
changing the narrative and your teaching
control, choice, and relevancy
developing
emotional set point
optimism and hope
reflection
student behaviors, factors affecting
student success and impact of
summary
poverty
cognitive differences
effects of, on children
statistics on
what it means for teachers
power minute
problem solving
progress, displaying daily
Project Zero
Purdy, A.
Q
questions
asking the right
powerful
reasoning questioning schema
types of
quick-writes
R
racism
Rationale
real-world examples, learning from
reasoning questioning schema
reasoning skills
See also thinking skills
reframing
reinforcement
relationships, building strong
relevancy
spacing
See also control, choice, and relevancy
repeat-after-me activities
retrieval, tools to strengthen
rewards
reward system
richer, use of term
Ritchhart, R.
role modeling
running your own brain
S
Scientific Learning
self-assessments
self-concept
self-regulation
serotonin
service work
setbacks, overcoming
set point
See also emotional set point
short-term memory
add-on activities
building
cadence songs
call-response songs
clapping repeats
defined
difference between working memory and
name games
number manipulation
number strings
online resources
repeat-after-me activities
Simon Says
visual and verbal memory quizzes
vocabulary builders
word boxes
Simon Says
Skeels, H.
social activities and projects
spaced learning
spaced relevancy
spontaneous happiness
Stagliano, K.
stress, responses to
stress-response system
student behaviors, factors affecting
student success, impact of positivity on
student verbalization
study aids
effectiveness of
relational
study skills, contextual
Success Principles, The (Canfield)
success stories, sharing
suggestions box
T
TED and TEDx Talks
thinking hats
thinking skills
argument mapping
arguments, forming effective
critical thinking
deconstruct constructs
defined
developing
evidence on teaching
language of thinking
powerful questions
problem solving
questions, asking the right
reasoning questioning schema
student verbalization
toxic mindset
Tresvant, J.
U
University of the People
V
visual and verbal memory quizzes
visual organizers
Visual Tools for Constructing Knowledge (Hyerle)
vocabulary builders
vocabulary skills
building
direct instruction
W
Willingham, D.
word boxes
word nutrients
Wordsmith
working memory
add-on activities
building
cadence songs
call-response songs
clapping repeats
defined
difference between short-term memory and
name games
number manipulation
number strings
online resources
poverty and effects on
repeat-after-me activities
Simon Says
visual and verbal memory quizzes
vocabulary builders
word boxes
workforce, changes in
Y
YouCanGo!
Z
Zero Tuition College
Poor Students, Rich Teaching
Eric Jensen
Discover research-based strategies to ensure all students, regardless
of circumstance, are college and career ready. This thorough resource
details the necessary but difficult work that teachers must do to
establish the foundational changes that positively impact students in
poverty.
BKF603