0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views9 pages

Divergencetheorem

1. The Gauss Divergence Theorem relates flux integrals over closed surfaces to volume integrals of the divergence over the enclosed region. 2. It states that the flux of a vector field F through the closed boundary surface ∂T is equal to the volume integral of the divergence of F over the entire region T enclosed by the surface. 3. Two examples are given to demonstrate applying the Gauss Divergence Theorem to calculate flux integrals by evaluating equivalent volume integrals, and vice versa.

Uploaded by

osama hasan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views9 pages

Divergencetheorem

1. The Gauss Divergence Theorem relates flux integrals over closed surfaces to volume integrals of the divergence over the enclosed region. 2. It states that the flux of a vector field F through the closed boundary surface ∂T is equal to the volume integral of the divergence of F over the entire region T enclosed by the surface. 3. Two examples are given to demonstrate applying the Gauss Divergence Theorem to calculate flux integrals by evaluating equivalent volume integrals, and vice versa.

Uploaded by

osama hasan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Gauss’ Divergence Theorem.

The Gauss Divergence theorem relates flux integrals and triple integrals.
Recall that when we evaluate a double integral over a surface we compute the
integral over the *skin* of the object enclosed by the surface (the boundary). In
triple integrals we integrate inside of the object:

Theorem 1 Gauss’ divergence theorem: Let T be a closed bounded region


in the space whose boundary ∂T is a piecewise smooth orientable surface. Let
F~ be a continuous vector field whose partial derivatives are continuous in some
domain containing T . Then:
ZZZ ZZ
div F~ dV = F~ · ~n dA
T ∂T

Example 1 Verify the divergence theorem when F~ (x, y, z) = (7x, 0, −z) and T
is the region enclosed by the sphere of radius 2.

1
In this case:
T = {(x, y, z) : x2 + y 2 + z 2 ≤ 4}

and
∂T = {(x, y, z) : x2 + y 2 + z 2 = 4}

We first compute the triple integral over T using a change of variable to spherical
coordinates:

−π π
(x, y, z) = (r cos θ cos φ, r sin θ cos φ, r sin φ), r ∈ [0, 2], θ ∈ [0, 2π], φ ∈ [ , ]
2 2

and the Jacobian of change of variables is:

∂x ∂y ∂z
∂r ∂r ∂r
∂x ∂y ∂z ∂(x, y, z)
J= = = r2 cos φ.
∂θ ∂θ ∂θ ∂(r, θ, φ)
∂x ∂y ∂z
∂φ ∂φ ∂φ
Then:
RRR ∂(7x) ∂0 ∂(−z)
div F~ dV
RRR
= + + dx dy dz
T T ∂x ∂y ∂z
RRR R 2π R π2 R 2 2
= 6 T
dxdydz = 6 0 −π 0
r cos φdr dφ dθ
2
R 2π R π2 h 3 r=2
i
= 6 0 −π cos φ r3 dφdθ
2 r=0
R 2π R π2
= 16 0 −π cos φdφ dθ
2
R 2π π
= 16 0 [sin φ] −π 2
dθ = 64π (4)
2

On the other hand, a parametric representation for ∂T , the sphere of radius 2,


could be:

−π π
~r(u, v) = (2 cos u cos v, 2 sin u cos v, 2 sin v), u ∈ [0, 2π], v ∈ [ , ]
2 2

Then:
~ru = (−2 sin u cos v, 2 cos u cos v, 0)

~rv = (−2 cos u sin v, −2 sin u sin v, 2 cos v)

2
therefore
~ru × ~rv = (4 cos u cos2 v, 4 sin u cos2 v, 4 cos v sin v)

and

F~ (~r(u, v)) = F~ (2 cos u cos v, 2 sin u cos v, 2 sin v) = (14 cos u cos v, 0, −2 sin v)
 
4 cos u cos2 v
R 2π R π2  
F~ (~r) · N
~ du dv =
RR
−π (14 cos u cos v, 0, −2 sin v)  4 sin u cos v  dv du
 2 
R 0 2  
4 cos v sin v
R 2π R π2
= 0 −π (56 cos3 v cos2 u − 8 cos v sin2 v)dvdu
2

Notice that:
R 2π R π2 R 2π R π2
0 −π 56 cos3 v cos2 udvdu = 56 0
cos2 u cos v(1 − sin2 v)dvdu
−π
2 2
R 2π R π R 2π R π2
= 56 0 cos2 u cos vdvdu − 56 0 −π
2
−π cos2 u cos v sin2 vdvdu
2 2
π 3 π
du − 56 0 cos2 u[ sin3 v ] −π
R 2π R 2π
= 56 0 cos2 u[sin v] −π
2 2
du
2 2

56(2 − 23 ) 0 cos2 udu


R 2π
=
56(2 − 23 ) 0 1 + cos 2u du
R 2π
= 2
= 56π(2 − 32 ) (♣)

cos 2u = 12 [sin 2u]2π


R 2π
because 0 0 = 0.

And:
R 2π R π2 R 2π sin3 v π2
0
−8 −π cos v sin2 vdvdu = −8
0
[ 3 ] −π du
2 2
32
= − 3 π (F)
Adding (♣) and (F) we obtain the same result that we got doing the triple
integral of the divergence of F~ over T (4).

F~ · ~n dA, when
RR
Example 2 Use the Divergence Theorem to calculate ∂T

∂T = {(x, y, z) : x2 + y 2 = z 2 , 0 ≤ z ≤ 2}

and F~ (x, y, z) = (4x, 3z, 5y)

3
By the Divergence Theorem:

F~ · ~ndA = divF~ dV,


RR RRR
∂T T

where T = {(x, y, z) : x2 + y 2 ≤ z 2 , 0 ≤ z ≤ 2}

divF~ dV
RRR RRR
T
= 4 T
1dxdydz
R 2 R z R √z2 −x2
= 4 √ 1dydxdz,
0 −z − z 2 −x2

Using polar coordinates, x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ and r ∈ [0, z] and θ ∈ [0, 2π]:
R 2 R z R √z2 −x2 R 2 R z R 2π
4 √ 1dydxdz = 4 rdθdrdz
0 0 − z 2 −x2 0 0 0
R2Rz
= 8π 0 −z
rdrdz
z 2 dz = 32π
R2
= 4π 3 0

Example 3 For F~ (x, y, z) = (x3 , x2 y, x2 z), evaluate ∂T F~ · ~n dA when:


RR

∂T = {x2 + y 2 = a2 , 0 ≤ z ≤ b} ∪ {x2 + y 2 ≤ a2 , z = 0} ∪ {x2 + y 2 ≤ a2 , z = b}

4
in two different ways.

By Gauss divergence theorem:


ZZ ZZZ
F~ · ~n dA = divF~ dV
∂T T

where T = {x2 + y 2 ≤ a2 , 0 ≤ z ≤ b} and divF~ = 5x2 .


Let us compute the triple integral first noticing that x and y are in the disc
of radius a, x2 + y 2 ≤ a2 and then we can write:
ZZZ Z b Z Z 
divF~ dV = 2
5x dxdy dz
T 0 x2 +y 2 ≤a2

We can use polar coordinates in the double integral as follows:

x = r cos θ, y = r sin θ, r ∈ [0, a], θ ∈ [0, 2π]

5
Recall that the Jacobian of change of variable in this case is r.
R b RR 2
 R b R 2π R a 3 2

0 x2 +y 2 ≤a2
5x dx dy dz = 5 0
r cos θdr dθ dz
0 0 r=a

r4
R b R 2π h i
2
= 5 0 0
cos θ 4 r=0 dθ dz
4 R b R 2π
 
5a
= 4 0 0 1 + cos 2θ dθ dz
2
4 4 Rb
= 5bπa + 5πa [sin 2θ] θ=2π
dz = 5bπa4 ()
4 8 0 θ=0 4
On the other hand:

F~ · ~n dA = F~ · ~n dA + F~ · ~n dA
RR RR RR
∂T {x2 +y 2 =a2 ,0≤z≤b} {x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,z=0}

F~ · ~n dA
RR
+ {x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,z=b}

We compute these three integrals independently.


To compute:
ZZ
F~ · ~n dA
{x2 +y 2 =a2 ,0≤z≤b}

6
we need a parametric representation of the circular cylinder of radius a, for ex-
ample:
~r(u, v) = (a cos u, a sin u, v), u ∈ [0, 2π], v ∈ [0, b]

Then
~ru = (−a sin u, a cos u, 0) and ~rv = (0, 0, 1)

obtaining:
~ = ~ru × ~rv = (a cos u, a sin u, 0)
N

Furthermore F~ (x, y, z) = (x3 , x2 y, x2 z) and therefore:

F~ (~r(u, v)) = (a3 cos3 u, a3 cos2 u sin u, a2 v cos2 u)

Then:
 
a cos u
 
F~ (~r(u, v))·N
~ = (a3 cos3 u, a3 cos2 u sin u, a2 v cos2 u)   = a4 cos4 u+a4 cos2 u sin2 u

 a sin u
 
0

But
a4 cos4 u + a4 cos2 u sin2 u = a4 cos2 u(cos2 u + sin2 u) = a4 cos2 u

Hence:
R b R 2π
F~ · ~n dA =
RR
{x2 +y 2 =a2 ,0≤z≤b} 0
a2 cos2 u du dv
0
2
= a2 0 0 (1 + cos 2u) du dv = a2 bπ,
R b R 2π

R 2π
because 2 0
cos 2udu = [sin 2u]2π
0 = 0.

To compute:
ZZ
F~ · ~n dA
{x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,≤z=0}

we need a parametric representation of the {x2 + y 2 ≤ a2 , z = 0}, for example:

~r(u, v) = (u cos v, u sin v, 0), u ∈ [0, a], v ∈ [0, 2π].

7
Then:
~ru = (cos v, sin v, 0) and ~rv = (−u sin v, u cos v, 0)

obtaining:
~ = ~ru × ~rv = (0, 0, u)
N

and
F~ (~r(u, v)) = (u3 cos3 v, u3 cos2 v sin v, 0)

Therefore:

 
0
 
~ ~ 3 3 3 2
F (~r(u.v)) · N = (u cos v, u cos v sin v, 0)  0  = 0
 
 
u
Hence:
ZZ
F~ · ~n dA = 0
{x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,≤z=0}

Finally, to compute:
ZZ
F~ · ~n dA
{x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,≤z=b}

we need a parametric representation of the {x2 + y 2 ≤ a2 , z = 0}, for example:

~r(u, v) = (u cos v, u sin v, b), u ∈ [0, a], v ∈ [0, 2π].

Then:
~ru = (cos v, sin v, 0) and ~rv = (−u sin v, u cos v, 0)

obtaining:
~ = ~ru × ~rv = (0, 0, u)
N

F~ (~r(u, v)) = (u3 cos3 v, u3 cos2 v sin v, bu2 cos2 v)

8
and
 
0
 
F~ (~r(u.v)) · N
~ = (u3 cos3 v, u3 cos2 v sin v, bu2 cos2 v) 
 0  = bu3 cos2 v

 
u

Therefore:

4
bu3 cos2 vdu dv = ba4 π
R 2π R a
F~ · ~n dA =
RR
{x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,≤z=b} 0 0

(Check this last integral, we have done similar ones before!) Hence:

F~ · ~n dA = F~ · ~n dA + F~ · ~n dA
RR RR RR
∂T {x2 +y 2 =a2 ,0≤z≤b} {x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,z=0}

F~ · ~n dA
RR
+ {x2 +y 2 ≤a2 ,z=b}
4 4
= ba4 π + 0 + ba4 π = 5ba4 π ,

as we expected from ()

You might also like