Design Examples of RC Columns
Design Examples of RC Columns
Solution
Step 1: Determine the second moment of area, I for the beams and columns
𝑏ℎ3 300𝑚𝑚∗(600𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚𝑠 = = = 54 ∗ 108 𝑚𝑚4
12 12
𝑏ℎ3 300𝑚𝑚∗(400𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝐷𝐸 = = = 16 ∗ 108 𝑚𝑚4
12 12
𝑏ℎ3 300𝑚𝑚∗(350𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛𝐸𝐹 = = = 10.72 ∗ 108 𝑚𝑚4
12 12
For beams
𝐸𝐼𝐵𝐸 𝐸 ∗ 54 ∗ 108
𝑘𝐵𝐸 = = = 6 ∗ 105 𝐸 = 𝑘𝐶𝐹
𝐿𝐵𝐸 9000
𝐸𝐼𝐸𝐻 𝐸 ∗ 54 ∗ 108
𝑘𝐸𝐻 = = = 7.2 ∗ 105 𝐸 = 𝑘𝐹𝐼
𝐿𝐸𝐻 7500
For columns
𝐸𝐼𝐵𝐸 𝐸 ∗ 16 ∗ 108
𝑘𝐷𝐸 = = = 4.21 ∗ 105 𝐸
𝐿𝐵𝐸 3800
𝐸𝐼𝐸𝐹 𝐸 ∗ 10.72 ∗ 108
𝑘𝐸𝐹 = = = 2.82 ∗ 105 𝐸
𝐿𝐸𝐹 3800
Step 3: Calculate rotational stiffness 𝑘 at the joints for the columns under consideration
𝐸𝐼
∑(
𝑘= 𝐿 ) 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝐸𝐼
∑ (2 ) 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚
𝐿
𝑘𝐸𝐹 2.82∗105 𝐸
@ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑘1 = 2𝑘 = 2(6+7.2)∗105 𝐸 = 0.21
𝐶𝐹 +2𝑘𝐹𝐼
𝑘 +𝑘 (4.21+2.82)105 𝐸
@ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 𝑘2 = 2𝑘 𝐷𝐸+2𝑘𝐸𝐹 = = 0.53
𝐵𝐸 𝐸𝐻 2(6+7.2)∗105 𝐸
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐿0 = 0.5𝐿√(1 + ) (1 + )
0.45 + 𝑘1 0.45 + 𝑘2
0.21 0.53
𝐿0 = 0.5 ∗ 3800√(1 + ) (1 + ) = 2707.8𝑚𝑚
0.45 + 0.21 0.45 + 0.53
𝑘1 ∗ 𝑘2
𝐿√[1 + 10 ( )]
𝑘1 + 𝑘2
𝑙0 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥.
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐿 (1 + ) (1 + )
{ 1 + 𝑘1 1 + 𝑘2
𝑘 ∗𝑘 0.21∗0.53
𝐿√[1 + 10 (𝑘 1+𝑘2 )] = 3800√[1 + 10 (0.21+0.53)] = 𝟔𝟎𝟏𝟑. 𝟐𝒎𝒎
1 2
𝑙0 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥. {
𝑘1 𝑘2 0.21 0.53
𝐿 (1 + 1+𝑘 ) (1 + 1+𝑘 ) = 3800 (1 + 1+0.21) (1 + 1+0.53) = 6004.3𝑚𝑚
1 2
𝑙0
𝜆=
𝑖
𝑀
𝑟𝑚 = 𝑀01 ; moment ratio
02
2
𝐶 = 1.7 − 𝒓𝒎 = 1.7 − (− ) = 71⁄30
3
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 = 6800𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑠 𝑓𝑦𝑑 6800 ∗ 400
𝜔= = = 0.96
𝑓𝑐𝑑 ∗ 𝑏ℎ 14.1667 ∗ 400 ∗ 500
Solution
Step 1: Material property
𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 30𝑀𝑃𝑎
Concrete: 𝐶25/30 { 𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 25𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓𝑐𝑑 = 14.167𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓𝑦𝑘 = 460𝑀𝑃𝑎
Steel reinforcement: 𝑆 − 460 {𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 400𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝜀𝑦𝑑 = 2‰
Step 2: Interaction diagram points
Referring ES EN 1992:2015 part 1-1 section 3.1.3; for concrete strengths not exceeding
50𝑀𝑝𝑎 the limiting compressive strains at ultimate limit state 𝜺𝒄𝒎 = 𝟐‰ for sections loaded
so that the whole section is in compression.
∴ 𝑀 = 0𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑃 5553.34∗103
Design normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗500 = 1.96
𝑐𝑑 ∗𝑏ℎ
𝑀 0
Design moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗5002 = 0
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ2
250−233.484
↺ + ∑ 𝑀𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑑 = 0 → 𝑀 + 𝐶𝑐 ( 1000
) + 𝐶𝑠2 ∗ 0.15 − 𝐶𝑠2 ∗ 0.15 = 0
∴ 𝑀 = 132.232𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑃 4724.124∗103
Design normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗500 = 1.667
𝑐𝑑 ∗𝑏ℎ
𝑀 132.232∗106
Design moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗5002 = 0.0926
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ2
At the concrete cracking commences 𝜺𝒄𝒎 to be 3.5‰ and from similarity of triangle 𝜀𝑠1 =
0.7‰; 𝜀𝑠2 = 2.8‰
𝜀𝑠1 < 𝜀𝑦𝑑 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑠 = 𝐸𝑠 ∗ 𝜀𝑠1 = 200000𝑀𝑃𝑎 ∗ 0.0007 = 140𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝜺𝒔𝟐 > 𝜺𝒚𝒅 → 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑠 = 𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 400𝑀𝑃𝑎
For 𝜺𝒄𝒎 ≥ 𝟐‰ and N.A. outside the section
1 2) 1
𝛼𝑐 = 189 (125 + 64𝜀𝑐𝑚 − 16𝜀𝑚 = 189 (125 + 64 ∗ 3.5 − 16 ∗ 3.52 ) = 0.8095
40(𝜀
𝑐𝑚 −2)2 40(3.5−2)2
𝛽𝑐 = 0.5 − 7(125+64𝜀 2 = 0.5 − 7(125+64∗3.5−16∗3.52 ) = 0.41596
𝑐𝑚 −16𝜀𝑚 )
250 − 207.983
↺ + ∑ 𝑀𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑑 = 0 → 𝑀 + 𝐶𝑐 ( ) + 𝐶𝑠2 ∗ 0.15 − 𝐶𝑠2 ∗ 0.15 = 0
1000
∴ 𝑀 = 228.972𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑃 4129.6508∗103
Design normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗500 = 1.4575
𝑐𝑑 ∗𝑏ℎ
𝑀 228.972∗106
Design moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 2
= 14.1667∗400∗5002 = 0.16163
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ
250 − 105.781
↺ + ∑ 𝑀𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑑 = 0 → 𝑀 + 𝐶𝑐 ( ) + 𝐶𝑠2 ∗ 0.15 + 𝑇𝑠1 ∗ 0.15 = 0
1000
∴ 𝑀 = 576.279𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑃 1167.559∗103
Design normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗500 = 0.412
𝑐𝑑 ∗𝑏ℎ
𝑀 576.279∗106
Design moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗5002 = 0.4068
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ2
A𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒 𝜀𝑠1 = 4‰
From similarity of triangle
𝑥 3.5
𝑘𝑥 = = = 0.4666 → 𝑥 = 0.4666 ∗ 𝑑 = 0.6363 ∗ 400𝑚𝑚 = 186.667𝑚𝑚
𝑑 3.5 + 4
𝜀𝑠1 = 4‰; 𝜀𝑠2 = 1.625‰
𝜀𝑠1 ≥ 𝜀𝑦𝑑 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑠 = 𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 400𝑀𝑃𝑎; 𝜀𝑠2 < 𝜀𝑦𝑑 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑠2 = 𝐸𝑠 ∗ 𝜀𝑠2 = 200000𝑀𝑃𝑎 ∗
0.001625 = 325𝑀𝑃𝑎
250 − 77.6469
↺ + ∑ 𝑀𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑑 = 0 → 𝑀 + 𝐶𝑐 ( ) + 𝐶𝑠2 ∗ 0.15 + 𝑇𝑠1 ∗ 0.15 = 0
1000
∴ 𝑀 = 517.3352𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑃 601.296∗103
Design normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗500 = 0.2122
𝑐𝑑 ∗𝑏ℎ
𝑀 517.3352∗106
Design moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗5002 = 0.365
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ2
𝜀𝑠1 > 𝜀𝑦𝑑 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑠 = 𝑓𝑦𝑑 = 400𝑀𝑃𝑎; 𝜀𝑠2 < 𝜀𝑦𝑑 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑓𝑠2 = 𝐸𝑠 ∗ 𝜀𝑠2 = 200 ∗ 𝜀𝑠2
From similarity of triangle
3.5
𝑘𝑥 =
3.5 + 𝜀𝑠1
For 𝜺𝒄𝒎 ≥ 𝟐‰ and N.A. within the section
3𝜀𝑐𝑚 −2 3.5 3∗3.5−2 2.8333
𝛼𝑐 = 𝑘𝑥 ( ) = 3.5+𝜀 ( ) = 3.5+𝜀
3𝜀𝑐𝑚 𝑠1 3∗3.5 𝑠1
2.8333 6422.146
𝐶𝑐 = 𝛼𝑐 𝑓𝑐𝑑 𝑏𝑑 = 3.5+𝜀 ∗ 14.1666 ∗ 400 = 𝑘𝑁
𝑠1 3.5+𝜀𝑠1
3675−350𝜀𝑠1 2499000−238000𝜀𝑠1
So 𝐶𝑠2 = 680𝜀𝑠2 = 680 ( )=
1400 1400
Equating the axial force 𝑃𝑛 = 0 for pure bending by summing the individual forces in the
concrete and steel
6422.146 2499000−238000𝜀𝑠1
𝑃 = 𝐶𝑐 + 𝐶𝑠2 − 𝑇𝑠1 = + − 1360 = 0 → 𝜀𝑠1 = 6.339‰
3.5+𝜀𝑠1 1400
3.5 3.5
𝑘𝑥 = 3.5+𝜀 = 3.5+6,339 = 0.3557
𝑠1
2.8333 2.8333
𝛼𝑐 = 3.5+𝜀 = 3.5+6.339 = 0.28796
𝑠1
250 − 59.1837
↺ + ∑ 𝑀𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑖𝑑 = 0 → 𝑀 + 𝐶𝑐 ( ) + 𝐶𝑠2 ∗ 0.15 + 𝑇𝑠1 ∗ 0.15 = 0
1000
∴ 𝑀 = 434.657𝑘𝑁𝑚
𝑃 0
Design normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗400∗500 = 0
𝑐𝑑 ∗𝑏ℎ
𝑀 434.657∗106
Design moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑓 2 = 14.1667∗400∗5002 = 0.3068
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ
Summary
Points 𝑃𝑛 (𝑘𝑁) 𝑀𝑛 (𝑘𝑁𝑚) 𝑣𝑠𝑑 𝜇𝑠𝑑
A 5553.34 0 1.96 0
B 4724.124 132.232 1.667 0.0926
C 4129.6508 228.972 1.4575 0.16163
D 1167.559 576.279 0.412 0.4068
E 601.296 517.3352 0.2122 0.365
F 0 434.657 0 0.3068
Interaction Chart
2.5
2 0, 1.96
0.0926, 1.667
1.5 0.16163, 1.4575
𝑣𝑠𝑑
Interaction Chart
1
0.5
0.4068, 0.412
0.365, 0.2122
0 0.3068, 0
0 0.1 0.2 𝜇𝑠𝑑 0.3 0.4 0.5
Solution
Step 1: Assume cross-section of the column
Size of the column is depending upon the loads coming to the structure, the spacing between
columns and the height of the structures.
𝑏 = 400𝑚𝑚; ℎ = 400𝑚𝑚
Assume concrete cover = 20𝑚𝑚, 𝜙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑏𝑎𝑟 = 20𝑚𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜙𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 = 8𝑚𝑚
𝜙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔. 𝑏𝑎𝑟 20
𝑏 ′ = ℎ′ = 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑐𝑟𝑒𝑡𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟 + 𝜙𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 + = 20 + 8 + = 38𝑚𝑚 ≈ 40𝑚𝑚
2 2
𝑑 = ℎ − ℎ′ = 400 − 40 = 360𝑚𝑚
Factored first order end moments are equivalent and constant along the length of column. So,
the column is bent in single curvature (i.e.𝑀01 (+𝑣𝑒) = 𝑀02 = 140𝑘𝑁𝑚)
𝑀 140
Single curvature 𝒓𝒎 = 𝑀01 = 140 = 1.0
02
𝑳𝟎 is the effective length, see 5.8.3.2 (2) to (7). But, in this problem it is given that 𝐿0 = 0.7𝐿
𝑙0 0.7 ∗ 6000
𝜆= = = 36.373
𝑖 115.47
𝜆 = 36.373 > 𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 12.63487
∴ The column is slender column. Second order effects must be considered in design.
Step 5: Accidental eccentricity 𝑒𝑎
Imperfections shall be taken into account in ultimate limit states in persistent and accidental
0 𝐿
design situations. For isolated columns in braced system, 𝑒𝑖 = 400 may be used to cover
∴ 𝑒2 = 0.1𝐿20 (1⁄𝑟)
𝐴𝑠 is the total area of reinforcement and 𝐴𝑐 is the area of concrete cross section
𝑲𝝋 is a factor for taking account of creep
𝐾𝜑 = 1 + 𝛽𝜑𝑒𝑓 ≥ 1.0
Where:
𝜑𝑒𝑓 is the effective creep ratio
The duration of loads may be taken into account in a simplified way by means of an effective
creep ratio 𝜑𝑒𝑓 , which used together with the design load, gives a creep deformation (curvature)
corresponding to the quasi-permanent load:
𝑀0𝐸𝑞𝑝
𝜑𝑒𝑓 = 𝜑(∞,𝑡0 ) ∗
𝑀0𝐸𝑑
Where:
𝑀0𝐸𝑞𝑝 is the first order bending moment in quasi-permanent load combination (SLS)
𝑀0𝐸𝑑 is the first order bending moment in design load combination (ULS)
If 𝑀0𝐸𝑞𝑝 /𝑀0𝐸𝑑 varies in a member or structure, the ratio may be calculated for the section with
maximum moment, or a representative mean value may be used.
The effect of creep may be ignored, if the following three conditions are met:
𝜑( ∞, 𝑡0 ) ≤ 2.0 … … 𝑂𝑘!
𝜆 ≤ 75 … … … … … . . 𝑂𝑘!
𝜑𝑒𝑓 = 0 𝑖𝑓 {𝑀
0𝐸𝑑
≥ ℎ … … … . . 𝑁𝑜𝑡 𝑂𝑘!
𝑁𝑠𝑑
Here 𝑀0𝐸𝑑 is the first order moment and h is the cross section depth in the corresponding
direction.
𝑀0𝐸𝑞𝑝 70
∴ 𝜑𝑒𝑓 = 𝜑(∞,𝑡0 ) ∗ =2∗ = 1.0
𝑀0𝐸𝑑 140
𝑐𝑘𝑓 𝜆
𝛽 = 0.35 + 200 − 150 𝜆 is the slenderness ratio
25 36.373
𝛽 = 0.35 + 200 − = 0.2325
150
𝑒2 = = 26.8411𝐾𝑟
0.45 ∗ 360
Step 8: Determine design moment 𝑀𝑠𝑑
𝑀𝑠𝑑 = 𝑁𝑠𝑑 𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑡
𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝑒𝑒 + 𝑒𝑎 + 𝑒2
For first iteration take 𝒆𝟐 = 𝟎
𝑒𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 𝑒𝑒 + 𝑒𝑎 + 𝑒2 = 84.848 + 10.5 + 0 = 95.348mm = 0.095348m
𝑀 157.3242∗106
Moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ2𝑠𝑑 = 400∗4002 ∗14.1667 = 0.17352
𝑓 𝑐𝑑
Using uniaxial chart 𝑁02 for 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 0.72794, 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 0.17352, ℎ′⁄ℎ = 0.1 → 𝜔 = 0.25
𝜔 = 0.25
𝜔 = 0.35
𝑀 184.525∗106
Moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ2𝑠𝑑 = 400∗4002 ∗14.1667 = 0.2035
𝑓 𝑐𝑑
Using uniaxial chart 𝑁02 for 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 0.72794, 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 0.2035, ℎ′⁄ℎ = 0.1 → 𝜔 = 0.35
𝑀 186.323∗106
Moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ2𝑠𝑑 = 400∗4002 ∗14.1667 = 0.2055
𝑓 𝑐𝑑
Using uniaxial chart 𝑁02 for 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 0.72794, 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 0.2055, ℎ′⁄ℎ = 0.1 → 𝜔 = 0.35
The iteration converges with similar mechanical steel ratio 𝝎 = 𝟎. 𝟑𝟓.
Step 9: Calculate the area of steel required in the column
𝜔𝐴𝑐 𝑓𝑐𝑑 0.35 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 ∗ 14.1667
𝑨𝒔,𝒓𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅 = = = 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟑. 𝟑𝟑𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝑓𝑦𝑑 400
𝑨𝒔,𝒓𝒆𝒒𝒖𝒓𝒆𝒅
𝑨= ⁄ = 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟑. 𝟑𝟑⁄ = 𝟗𝟗𝟏. 𝟔𝟔𝟔𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝟐 𝟐
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 1983.33
𝑁0 𝜙20𝑚𝑚 bars = = 𝜋(20)2
= 6.313 ≈ 𝑢𝑠𝑒 8𝜙20𝑚𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠
𝑎𝑠
4
8 ∗ 𝜋(20)2
𝑨𝒔,𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 = = 2513.274𝑚𝑚2
4
Step 5: Check with maximum and minimum reinforcement limit
0.1𝑁𝐸𝑑 0.1∗1650∗103
= = 𝟒𝟏𝟐. 𝟓𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥. { 𝑓𝑦𝑑 400
0.002𝐴𝑐 = 0.002 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 = 320𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.08𝐴𝑐 = 0.08 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 = 12800𝑚𝑚2 → 𝑎𝑡 𝐿𝑎𝑝𝑠
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.04𝐴𝑐 = 0.04 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 = 6400𝑚𝑚2 → 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝑎𝑝𝑠
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 474.375𝑚𝑚2 ≤ 𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 1983.33𝑚𝑚2 ≤ 𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 12800𝑚𝑚2 … 𝑂𝑘!
40𝑚𝑚
320𝑚𝑚
106.67𝑚𝑚
106.67𝑚𝑚
106.67𝑚𝑚
40𝑚𝑚
40𝑚𝑚
40𝑚𝑚
The nominal stiffness should be defined in such a way that total bending moments resulting
from the analysis can be used for design of cross sections to their resistance for bending moment
and axial force.
In a second order analysis based on nominal stiffness, nominal values of the flexural stiffness
should be used taking into account the effects of cracking, material non-linearity and creep on
the overall behavior.
To estimate the nominal stiffness of slender compression member with arbitrary cross section:
𝐸𝐼 = 𝐾𝑐 𝐸𝑐𝑑 𝐼𝑐 + 𝐾𝑠 𝐸𝑠 𝐼𝑠
Where:
𝐼𝑠 is the second value of the modus of elasticity of reinforcement about the center of area of the
concrete
𝐸𝑐𝑚 30
𝐸𝑐𝑑 = = = 25𝐺𝑃𝑎
𝛾𝐶𝐸 1.2
𝛾𝐶𝐸 is the partial factor for effective concrete modulus. The recommended value of 𝛾𝐶𝐸 is 1.2.
𝐸𝑐𝑚 30
𝐸𝑐𝑑 = = = 25𝐺𝑃𝑎
𝛾𝐶𝐸 1.2
Factor for contribution of reinforcement and effects cracking, creep (𝐾𝑠 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐾𝑐 )
The total design moment 𝑀𝐸𝑑 including second order moment may be expressed as a
magnification of the bending moments resulting from a linear analysis namely:
𝛽
𝑀𝐸𝑑 = 𝑀0𝐸𝑑 [1 + ]
𝑁𝐵
( ⁄𝑁 ) − 1
𝐸𝑑
Where:
𝜋 2 𝐸𝐼 𝜋 2 ∗ 1.06667 ∗ 1013
𝑁𝐵 = 2 = = 5968014.75𝑁 = 5968.01475𝑘𝑁
𝐿0 (0.7 ∗ 6000)2
For isolated members with constant cross section and axial load, the second order moment may
normally be assumed to have a sine-shaped distribution. Then
2
𝛽 = 𝜋 ⁄𝑐0
𝑐0 is a coefficient which depends on the distribution of first order moment (for instance, 𝑐0 = 8
for a constant first order moment)
2 2
𝛽 = 𝜋 ⁄𝑐0 = 𝜋 ⁄8 = 1.2337
For members without transverse load (i.e. members without loads applied between their ends),
differing first order end moments 𝑀01 and 𝑀02 may be replaced by an equivalent constant first
order moment 𝑀0𝐸𝑑 . Consistent with the assumption of a constant first order moment, 𝑐0 = 8
should be used.
𝑀01 and 𝑀02 should have the same sign if they give tension on the same side, otherwise
opposite signs. Furthermore, |𝑀02 | ≥ |𝑀01 |.
𝑁 1650∗103
Normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑑 = 400∗400∗14.1667 = 0.72794
𝑐𝑑
𝑀 205.999∗106
Moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ2𝑠𝑑 = 400∗4002 ∗14.1667 = 0.2272
𝑓 𝑐𝑑
Using uniaxial chart 𝑁02 for 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 0.72794, 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 0.2272, ℎ′⁄ℎ = 0.1 → 𝜔 = 0.4
𝜔𝐴𝑐 𝑓𝑐𝑑 0.4 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 ∗ 14.1667
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 = = = 𝟐𝟐𝟔𝟔. 𝟔𝟔𝟔𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝑓𝑦𝑑 400
𝐴𝑠,𝑟𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑟𝑒𝑑
𝐴𝑠 = ⁄ = 2266.666⁄ = 1133.333𝑚𝑚2
2 2
𝐴𝑠 1133.333
𝜌= = = 7.870 ∗ 10−3 ≱ 0.01 → 𝑊𝑒 𝑐𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑜𝑡 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑒𝑑 𝑚𝑒𝑡ℎ𝑜𝑑
𝑏𝑑 400 ∗ 360
𝜔 = 0.4
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐾𝑐 = ⁄(1 + 𝜑 )
𝑒𝑓
Where:
𝐴𝑠
𝜌 is the geometric reinforcement ratio, ⁄𝐴
𝑐
𝜆
𝑘2 = 𝑛 ∗ 170 ≤ 0.20
Where:
𝑛 is the relative axial force, 𝑁𝐸𝑑 ⁄(𝐴𝑐 𝑓𝑐𝑑 ) = 1650 ∗ 103 ⁄400 ∗ 400 ∗ 14.1667 = 0.72794
36.373
𝑘2 = 0.72794 ∗ = 0.156 ≤ 0.20 𝑇𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑘2 = 0.2
170
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐾𝑐 = ⁄(1 + 𝜑 ) = 1.11803 ∗ 0.2⁄(1 + 1) = 0.11803
𝑒𝑓
𝐼𝑠 is the second value of the modus of elasticity of reinforcement about the center of area of the
concrete
∴ 𝐸𝐼 = 𝐾𝑐 𝐸𝑐𝑑 𝐼𝑐 + 𝐾𝑠 𝐸𝑠 𝐼𝑠
𝜋 2 𝐸𝐼 𝜋 2 ∗ 1.756816 ∗ 1013
𝑁𝐵 = = = 9829409.82𝑁 = 9829.40982𝑘𝑁
𝐿20 (0.7 ∗ 6000)2
𝛽 1.2337
∴ 𝑀𝐸𝑑 = 𝑀0𝐸𝑑 [1 + 𝑁𝐵 ] = 140 [1 + (9829.40982 ] = 174.842𝑘𝑁𝑚
( ⁄𝑁 )−1 ⁄1650)−1
𝐸𝑑
10.5
𝑀𝑠𝑑 = 𝑀𝐸𝑑 + 𝑁𝑠𝑑 ∗ 𝑒𝑎 = 174.842 + 1650 ∗ ( ) = 192.167𝑘𝑁𝑚
1000
𝑁 1650∗103
Normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑑 = 400∗400∗14.1667 = 0.72794
𝑐𝑑
𝑀 192.167∗106
Moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ2𝑠𝑑 = 400∗4002 ∗14.1667 = 0.212
𝑓 𝑐𝑑
Using uniaxial chart 𝑁02 for 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 0.72794, 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 0.212, ℎ′⁄ℎ = 0.1 → 𝜔 = 0.35
𝜔𝐴𝑐 𝑓𝑐𝑑 0.35 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 ∗ 14.1667
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 = = = 𝟏𝟗𝟖𝟑. 𝟑𝟑𝟑𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝑓𝑦𝑑 400
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡
𝐴𝑠 = ⁄ = 1983.333⁄ = 991.666𝑚𝑚2
2 2
𝐴𝑠 991.666
𝜌= = = 6.886 ∗ 10−3 ≥ 0.002 … … … … . 𝑂𝑘
𝑏𝑑 400 ∗ 360
For third iteration check the result with the calculated reinforcement area
𝑏ℎ3 400∗(400)3
𝐼𝑐 = = = 2133333333𝑚𝑚4
12 12
∴ 𝐸𝐼 = 𝐾𝑐 𝐸𝑐𝑑 𝐼𝑐 + 𝐾𝑠 𝐸𝑠 𝐼𝑠
𝜋 2 𝐸𝐼 𝜋 2 ∗ 1.611749 ∗ 1013
𝑁𝐵 = 2 = = 9017759.8𝑁 = 9017.7598𝑘𝑁
𝐿0 (0.7 ∗ 6000)2
𝛽 1.2337
∴ 𝑀𝐸𝑑 = 𝑀0𝐸𝑑 [1 + 𝑁 ] = 140 [1 + (9017.7598 ] = 178. 679𝑘𝑁𝑚
( 𝐵⁄𝑁 )−1 ⁄1650)−1
𝐸𝑑
10.5
𝑀𝑠𝑑 = 𝑀𝐸𝑑 + 𝑁𝑠𝑑 ∗ 𝑒𝑎 = 178. 679 + 1650 ∗ ( ) = 196.004𝑘𝑁𝑚
1000
𝑁 1650∗103
Normal force ratio: 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ𝑓𝑠𝑑 = 400∗400∗14.1667 = 0.72794
𝑐𝑑
𝑀 196.004∗106
Moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ2𝑠𝑑 = 400∗4002 ∗14.1667 = 0.216
𝑓 𝑐𝑑
Using uniaxial chart 𝑁02 for 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 0.72794, 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 0.216, ℎ′⁄ℎ = 0.1 → 𝜔 = 0.35
The iteration converges with similar mechanical steel ratio 𝜔 = 0.35.
𝜔 = 0.35
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡
𝐴𝑠 = ⁄ = 1983.333⁄ = 991.666𝑚𝑚2
2 2
𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 1983.33
𝑁0 𝜙20𝑚𝑚 bars = = 𝜋(20)2
= 6.313 ≈ 𝑢𝑠𝑒 8𝜙20𝑚𝑚 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠
𝑎𝑠
4
8 ∗ 𝜋(20)2
𝑨𝒔,𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 = = 2513.274𝑚𝑚2
4
Check with maximum and minimum reinforcement limit
0.1𝑁𝐸𝑑 0.1∗1650∗103
= = 𝟒𝟏𝟐. 𝟓𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥. { 𝑓𝑦𝑑 400
0.002𝐴𝑐 = 0.002 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 = 320𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.08𝐴𝑐 = 0.08 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 = 12800𝑚𝑚2 → 𝑎𝑡 𝐿𝑎𝑝𝑠
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.04𝐴𝑐 = 0.04 ∗ 400 ∗ 400 = 6400𝑚𝑚2 → 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝑎𝑝𝑠
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 474.375𝑚𝑚2 ≤ 𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 1983.33𝑚𝑚2 ≤ 𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 12800𝑚𝑚2 … 𝑂𝑘!
Determine the diameter and spacing of transverse reinforcement
6𝑚𝑚
𝜙𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≥ {1⁄ ∗ 𝑚𝑎𝑥. 𝑑𝑖𝑎. 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑖. 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 = 5𝑚𝑚
4
In our case, we have used 𝜙8𝑚𝑚 . It is ok.
The spacing of the transverse reinforcement along the column should not exceed 𝑠𝑐𝑙,𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑥
20𝜙𝑙,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 20 ∗ 20𝑚𝑚 = 400𝑚𝑚
𝑠𝑐𝑙,𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤ {𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 = 400𝑚𝑚
400𝑚𝑚
∴Use 𝜙8𝑚𝑚 @ 400𝑚𝑚 𝑐/𝑐 at the Mid-height
In sections within ℎ (larger dimension of the column cross-section) above or below a beam or
slab:
12𝜙𝑙,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 12 ∗ 20 = 240𝑚𝑚
𝑆𝑐𝑙,𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑀𝑖𝑛 { 0.6𝑏 = 0.6 ∗ 400 = 240𝑚𝑚
240𝑚𝑚
∴Use 𝜙8𝑚𝑚 @ 240𝑚𝑚 𝑐/𝑐 at the beam-column joints and in the lapped zone
A minimum of 3 transverse reinforcements evenly placed in the lap length is required.
Determine the distribution of bars in accordance with the charts requirement and detailing it.
40𝑚𝑚
320𝑚𝑚
106.67𝑚𝑚
106.67𝑚𝑚
106.67𝑚𝑚 40𝑚𝑚
40𝑚𝑚
40𝑚𝑚
Solution
Step 1: Material data
𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 30𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 25𝑀𝑃𝑎
Concrete: 𝐶25/30 {
𝑓𝑐𝑑 = 14.167𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐸𝑐𝑚 = 30𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓𝑦𝑘 = 500𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓 = 434.7826𝑀𝑃𝑎
Steel reinforcement: 𝑆 − 500 𝑦𝑑
𝐸𝑠 = 200𝐺𝑃𝑎
{ 𝑦𝑑 = 2.1739‰
𝜀
Step 2: Check slenderness limit
2.1. In the 𝒙 −direction
Limit slenderness ratio 𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 (Refer ES EN 1992:2015 section 5.8.3.1)
20 ∗ 𝐴 ∗ 𝐵 ∗ 𝐶
𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 =
√𝜂
Where:
𝑨 = 𝟏⁄(𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝝋𝒆𝒇 ) (If 𝜑𝑒𝑓 is not known, 𝑨 = 𝟎. 𝟕 may be used)
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐿0 = 0.5𝐿√(1 + ) (1 + )
0.45 + 𝑘1 0.45 + 𝑘2
𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
Rotational stiffness at the joints 𝑘𝑖 = ∑ 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
𝐸𝐼
( 𝐿 ) 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝑘𝑖 =
𝐸𝐼
∑ (2
𝐿 ) 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚
𝑏ℎ3 250𝑚𝑚∗(400𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚,𝑡𝑜𝑝 = = = 1333333333𝑚𝑚4
12 12
𝑏ℎ3 250𝑚𝑚∗(350𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚,𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = = = 893229166.7𝑚𝑚4
12 12
ℎ𝑏 3 450𝑚𝑚∗(300𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 = = = 1012500000𝑚𝑚4
12 12
1012500000
𝑘𝑐 𝐸
4500
@ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑘1 = 2𝑘 = 1333333333 1333333333 = 0.2025
𝑏1 +2𝑘𝑏2 2𝐸( + )
4000 6000
1012500000
𝑘𝑐 𝐸
4500
@ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 𝑘2 = 2𝑘 = 893229166.7 893229166.7 = 0.30227
𝑏3 +2𝑘𝑏4 2𝐸( + )
4000 6000
0.2025 0.30227
𝐿0𝑥 = 0.5 ∗ 4500√(1 + 0.45+0.2025) (1 + 0.45+0.30227) = 3049.87𝑚𝑚
𝐿0𝑥 3049.87𝑚𝑚
𝜆𝑥 = = = 35.217
𝑖𝑥 86.6025𝑚𝑚
𝜆𝑥 = 35.217 > 𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚,𝑥 = 35.11845
∴ The column is slender column in the 𝑥 −direction. Second order effects must be considered
in design.
2.2 In the 𝒚 −direction
Limit slenderness ratio 𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 (Refer ES EN 1992:2015 section 5.8.3.1)
20 ∗ 𝐴 ∗ 𝐵 ∗ 𝐶
𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 =
√𝜂
Where:
𝑨 = 𝟏⁄(𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝝋𝒆𝒇 ) (If 𝜑𝑒𝑓 is not known, 𝑨 = 𝟎. 𝟕 may be used)
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐿0 = 0.5𝐿√(1 + ) (1 + )
0.45 + 𝑘1 0.45 + 𝑘2
𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
Rotational stiffness at the joints 𝑘𝑖 = ∑ 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
𝐸𝐼
( 𝐿 ) 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝑘𝑖 =
𝐸𝐼
∑ (2
𝐿 ) 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚
𝑏ℎ3 200𝑚𝑚∗(300𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚,𝑡𝑜𝑝 = = = 450000000𝑚𝑚4
12 12
𝑏ℎ3 250𝑚𝑚∗(350𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚,𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 = = = 893229166.7𝑚𝑚4
12 12
𝑏ℎ3 300𝑚𝑚∗(450𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 = = = 2278125000𝑚𝑚4
12 12
2278125000
𝑘𝑐 𝐸
9000
@ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑘1 = 2𝑘 = 4500000003 450000000 = 0.625
𝑏1 +2𝑘𝑏2 2𝐸( + )
4000 5000
2278125000
𝑘𝑐 𝐸
9000
@ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑜𝑡𝑡𝑜𝑚 𝑘2 = = 893229166.7 893229166.7 = 0.31486
2𝑘𝑏3 +2𝑘𝑏4 2𝐸( + )
4000 5000
0.625 0.31486
𝐿0𝑦 = 0.5 ∗ 9000√(1 + 0.45+0.625) (1 + 0.45+0.31486) = 6723.53𝑚𝑚
𝐿0𝑦 6723.53𝑚𝑚
𝜆𝑦 = = = 51.76
𝑖𝑦 129.9038𝑚𝑚
𝜆𝑦 = 51.76 > 𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚,𝑦 = 29.58299
∴ The column is slender column in the 𝑦 −direction. Second order effects must be considered
in design.
Step 3: Accidental eccentricity 𝑒𝑎
3.1 In the 𝒙 −direction
𝐿0𝑥 3049.87𝑚𝑚
𝑒𝑎𝑥 = = = 7.625𝑚𝑚
400 400
Where:
2
𝐿
𝑀2 = 𝑁𝑠𝑑 ∗ 𝑒2 𝑒2 = (1⁄𝑟) 0 ⁄𝑐
Assume concrete cover of 30mm, 𝜙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓′ 𝑡 = 16𝑚𝑚, 𝜙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓′ 𝑡 = 8𝑚𝑚
𝑏 ′ = 30 + 8 + 16⁄2 = 46𝑚𝑚 ≈ 45𝑚𝑚
𝑏 = 𝐵 − 𝑏 ′ = 300 − 45 = 255𝑚𝑚
1⁄ = 𝜀𝑦𝑑⁄ 2.173913 ∗ 10−3⁄ −5
𝑟0 0.45𝑑 = 0.45 ∗ 255 = 1.894478 ∗ 10
𝐾𝜑 = 1 + 𝛽𝜑𝑒𝑓 ≥ 1.0
𝑐𝑘 𝑓 𝑥 𝜆 25 35.217
𝛽 = 0.35 + 200 − 150 = 0.35 + 200 − = 0.21522
150
𝑛𝑏𝑎𝑙 is the value of 𝑛 at maximum moment resistance; the value 0.4 may be used
𝑁𝑠𝑑 1700∗103
𝑛=𝐴 = 300∗450∗14.1667 = 0.8888
𝑐 𝑓𝑦𝑑
500⁄
𝐾𝑟 ∗1.21522∗0.1∗(3049.87)2 ∗( 1.15)
𝐾𝑟 𝐾𝜙 0.1𝐿20𝑥 𝜀𝑦𝑑 200000
𝑒2 = = = 21.414456𝐾𝑟
0.45𝑑 0.45∗255
Assume concrete cover of 30mm, 𝜙𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓′ 𝑡 = 16𝑚𝑚, 𝜙𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑠𝑒 𝑟𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑓′ 𝑡 = 8𝑚𝑚
ℎ′ = 30 + 8 + 16⁄2 = 46𝑚𝑚 ≈ 45𝑚𝑚
ℎ = 𝐻 − ℎ′ = 450 − 45 = 405𝑚𝑚
1⁄ = 𝜀𝑦𝑑⁄ 2.173913 ∗ 10−3⁄ −5
𝑟0 0.45𝑑 = 0.45 ∗ 405 = 1.19282 ∗ 10
𝐾𝜑 = 1 + 𝛽𝜑𝑒𝑓 ≥ 1.0
𝑐𝑘 𝑓 𝜆𝑦 25 51.76
𝛽 = 0.35 + 200 − 150 = 0.35 + 200 − = 0.13
150
𝑛𝑏𝑎𝑙 is the value of 𝑛 at maximum moment resistance; the value 0.4 may be used
𝑁𝑠𝑑 1700∗103
𝑛=𝐴 = 300∗450∗14.1667 = 0.8888
𝑐 𝑓𝑦𝑑
500⁄
𝐾𝑟 ∗1.13∗0.1∗(6723.53)2 ∗( 1.15)
𝐾𝑟 𝐾𝜙 0.1𝐿20𝑦 𝜀𝑦𝑑 200000
𝑒2 = = = 60.93233𝐾𝑟
0.45𝑑 0.45∗405
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑥 38.1735∗106
Moment ratios: 𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑥 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗450∗3002 = 0.0665
𝑐𝑑 ℎ𝑏 2
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑦 78.57536∗106
𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑦 = 𝑓 2
= 14.1667∗300∗4502 = 0.0913
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ
ℎ′ 𝑏′
Using = = 0.1 read the mechanical steel ratio from biaxial interaction chart 𝑁0 . 35 for
ℎ 𝑏
𝜔 = 0.3
𝜔 = 0.25
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑥 54.3371∗106
Moment ratios: 𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑥 = 𝑓 2
= 14.1667∗450∗3002 = 0.0947
𝑐𝑑 ℎ𝑏
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑦 124.56716∗106
𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑦 = 𝑓 2
= 14.1667∗300∗4502 = 0.14474
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ
ℎ′ 𝑏′
Using = = 0.1 read the mechanical steel ratio from biaxial interaction chart 𝑁0 . 35 for
ℎ 𝑏
𝜔 = 0.3
𝜔 = 0.45
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑥 56.23∗106
Moment ratios: 𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑥 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗450∗3002 = 0.098
𝑐𝑑 ℎ𝑏 2
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑦 129.9535∗106
𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑦 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗300∗4502 = 0.151
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ2
ℎ′ 𝑏′
Using = = 0.1 read the mechanical steel ratio from biaxial interaction chart 𝑁0 . 35 for
ℎ 𝑏
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑥 58.6415∗106
Moment ratios: 𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑥 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗450∗3002 = 0.1022
𝑐𝑑 ℎ𝑏 2
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑦 136.815𝑘𝑁𝑚∗106
𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑦 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗300∗4502 = 0.159
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ2
ℎ′ 𝑏′
Using = = 0.1 read the mechanical steel ratio from biaxial interaction chart 𝑁0 . 35 for
ℎ 𝑏
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑥 59.3247∗106
Moment ratios: 𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑥 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗450∗3002 = 0.1034
𝑐𝑑 ℎ𝑏 2
𝑀𝑠𝑑,𝑦 138.758𝑘𝑁𝑚∗106
𝜇𝑠𝑑,𝑦 = 𝑓 = 14.1667∗300∗4502 = 0.16123
𝑐𝑑 𝑏ℎ2
ℎ′ 𝑏′
Using = = 0.1 read the mechanical steel ratio from biaxial interaction chart 𝑁0 . 35 for
ℎ 𝑏
16 ∗ 𝜋(16)2
= 3216.99𝑚𝑚2
𝑨𝒔,𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒗𝒊𝒅𝒆𝒅 =
4
Step 5: Check with maximum and minimum reinforcement limit
0.1𝑁𝐸𝑑 0.1 ∗ 1700 ∗ 103
= = 𝟑𝟗𝟏𝒎𝒎𝟐
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑀𝑎𝑥. { 𝑓𝑦𝑑 434.7826
0.002𝐴𝑐 = 0.002 ∗ 300 ∗ 450 = 270𝑚𝑚2
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.08𝐴𝑐 = 0.08 ∗ 300 ∗ 450 = 10800𝑚𝑚2 → 𝑎𝑡 𝐿𝑎𝑝𝑠
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 0.04𝐴𝑐 = 0.04 ∗ 300 ∗ 450 = 5400𝑚𝑚2 → 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝑎𝑝𝑠
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 391𝑚𝑚2 ≤ 𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 2492.33𝑚𝑚2 ≤ 𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 10800𝑚𝑚2 … 𝑂𝑘!
Step 7: Determine the diameter and spacing of transverse reinforcement
6𝑚𝑚
𝜙𝑠,𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≥ {1⁄ ∗ 𝑚𝑎𝑥. 𝑑𝑖𝑎. 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔𝑖. 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑠 = 4𝑚𝑚
4
In our case, we have used 𝜙8𝑚𝑚 . It is ok.
The spacing of the transverse reinforcement along the column should not exceed 𝑠𝑐𝑙,𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑥
20𝜙𝑙,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 20 ∗ 16𝑚𝑚 = 320𝑚𝑚
𝑠𝑐𝑙,𝑡 𝑚𝑎𝑥 ≤ {𝑇ℎ𝑒 𝑙𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 = 300𝑚𝑚
400𝑚𝑚
∴Use 𝜙8𝑚𝑚 @ 300𝑚𝑚 𝑐/𝑐 at the Mid-height
In sections within ℎ (larger dimension of the column cross-section) above or below a beam or
slab:
12𝜙𝑙,𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 12 ∗ 16 = 192𝑚𝑚
𝑆𝑐𝑙,𝑡𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑀𝑖𝑛 { 0.6𝑏 = 0.6 ∗ 300 = 180𝑚𝑚
240𝑚𝑚
∴Use 𝜙8𝑚𝑚 @ 180𝑚𝑚 𝑐/𝑐 at the beam-column joints and in the lapped zone
A minimum of 3 transverse reinforcements evenly placed in the lap length is required.
Step 8: Determine the distribution of bars in accordance with the charts requirement and
detailing it.
Exercise: Check using nominal stiffness method and compere the results.
Solution
Step 1: Material data
𝑓𝑐𝑢 = 30𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓𝑐𝑘 = 25𝑀𝑃𝑎
Concrete: 𝐶25/30 {
𝑓𝑐𝑑 = 14.167𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝐸𝑐𝑚 = 30𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓𝑦𝑘 = 460𝑀𝑃𝑎
𝑓 = 400𝑀𝑃𝑎
Steel reinforcement: 𝑆 − 460 𝑦𝑑
𝐸𝑠 = 200𝐺𝑃𝑎
{ 𝜀𝑦𝑑 = 2‰
Step 2: Check slenderness limit
Limit slenderness ratio 𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 (Refer ES EN 1992:2015 section 5.8.3.1)
20 ∗ 𝐴 ∗ 𝐵 ∗ 𝐶
𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 =
√𝜂
Where:
𝑨 = 𝟏⁄(𝟏 + 𝟎. 𝟐𝝋𝒆𝒇 ) (If 𝜑𝑒𝑓 is not known, 𝑨 = 𝟎. 𝟕 may be used)
𝑘1 𝑘2
𝐿0 = 0.5𝐿√(1 + ) (1 + )
0.45 + 𝑘1 0.45 + 𝑘2
𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
Rotational stiffness at the joints 𝑘𝑖 = ∑ 𝐵𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
𝐸𝐼
( 𝐿 ) 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛
𝑘𝑖 =
𝐸𝐼
∑ (2
𝐿 ) 𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚
𝑏ℎ3 250𝑚𝑚∗(500𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑏𝑒𝑎𝑚 = = = 2604166667𝑚𝑚4
12 12
𝑏ℎ3 400𝑚𝑚∗(400𝑚𝑚)3
𝐼𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑛 = = = 2133333333𝑚𝑚4
12 12
2133333333
𝑘𝑐 𝐸
6000
@ 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑡𝑜𝑝 𝑘1 = 2𝑘 = 2604166667 2604166667 = 0.2048
𝑏1 +2𝑘𝑏2 2𝐸( + )
6000 6000
𝐿0 3712.688𝑚𝑚
𝜆= = = 32.153 < 𝜆𝑙𝑖𝑚 = 56.467
𝑖 115.470𝑚𝑚
∴ The column is short column. Second order effects ignored in design.
Step 4: Accidental eccentricity 𝑒𝑎
Imperfections shall be taken into account in ultimate limit states in persistent and accidental
0 𝐿
design situations. For isolated columns in braced system, 𝑒𝑖 = 400 may be used to cover
𝑀 76.374∗106
Moment ratio: 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 𝑏ℎ2𝑠𝑑 = 400∗4002 ∗14.1667 = 0.084
𝑓 𝑐𝑑
Using uniaxial chart 𝑁02 for 𝑣𝑠𝑑 = 0.36, 𝜇𝑠𝑑 = 0.084, ℎ′⁄ℎ = 0.1 → 𝝎 = 𝟎. 𝟎
𝜔 = 0.0
This means 𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 = 0. But as per the code we should providing 𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛 . Therefore 𝐴𝑠,𝑡𝑜𝑡 =
𝐴𝑠,𝑚𝑖𝑛