Chapter 2
Chapter 2
Chapter 2
purpose of this paper was to critically analyze the research and problematize the notion that
teaching and understanding mathematics is a "given" in STEM education. The paper made
the case that, in order for students to be able to solve mathematical problems, it is crucial to
take into account both teaching models and student cognitive types during the learning
Learning—The Importance of Peer Acceptance and Friendships", said that by examining the
in heterogeneous fifth-grade classrooms where kids with special needs are taught alongside
their peers, the study hoped to advance prior studies. The intervention included teaching
models of multiplication and division, along with a cooperative learning method. According
on how well they succeed in the subject. This unfavorable attitude is associated with a
student's low self-esteem, sense of worth, enjoyment, and emotional state. Poor performance
in the subject can be attributed to a variety of factors, according to Chand et al. (2021),
school mathematics curricula, and primary school teachers' lack of ability and competence to
instruct mathematics at the primary school level. The study made a number of
recommendations to boost math performance, including a review and revision of the year 12
and 13 mathematics curricula, the use of technology to teach math, the development of better
primary school math teachers, a decrease in the importance of exams, and the inclusion of
internal assessments, projects, and fieldwork in the mathematics curriculum. Furthermore, an
investigation by Wu et al. (2012) titled "Mathematics Anxiety and Its Relationship to Overall
Anxiety and Performance among Multicultural High School Students". The study investigates
the association between general anxiety, academic performance, and mathematics anxiety
through Career Awareness” found that lack of knowledge and appreciation of the prominence
with the subject. A perceived lack of relevance can result in disinterest, and even
The goal of Isabelo V. Silao, Jr.’s (2018) study at Kiamba Central School SPED Center in
Kiamba, Sarangani, the Philippines, was to identify the variables influencing Filipino
substantial correlation between students' ability to solve problems and their mastery of
fundamental abilities, attitude toward mathematics, and parental involvement. The study also
showed that the researcher was drawn to investigate the variables influencing the
mathematics performance of Kiamba SPED Center students because of their desire for
the University of Santo Tomas in Manila, Philippines, with the goal of identifying the
challenges that students have when attempting to solve mathematical problems. According to
the study, children struggled to distinguish important information from irrelevant information
and to comprehend mathematical ideas. Dr. Maria Victoria Trinidad (2013) set out to look
into the methods Filipino students used to solve problems in 2013 at De La Salle University
found it challenging to use these techniques successfully. Garcia (2010), it was found that
students who have low self-esteem in mathematics have lower academic performance in other
subjects as well. Mendoza (2010), it was found that students who have difficulty in
mathematics have lower self-esteem and confidence which affects their academic
performance. Dinah C. Vidad and Maria Ana T. Quimbo (2021) titled "Students' Problem-
solving Difficulties and Coping Strategies in Mathematics: Model-Building Study" that could
be useful. According to the study, children who have trouble with math problem-solving
activities adopt coping mechanisms that can be categorized as either problem- or emotion-
research methodology. The student's academic plans and sexual orientation were also
connected to the models containing the two variables. Through the administration of a
problem-solving test, difficulties were counted using descriptive statistical metrics like
frequency count and percentages. However, it should be remembered that a response might
Students in STEM. Program". The goal of the study was to see how high school students
efficacy. The study discovered that mathematical self-efficacy had a favorable impact on
Students ability to apply mathematical knowledge to various situations has been one of the
major concerns in mathematics education research. However, little is known about the
In this review of existing literature, we discuss the contribution of assessment strategies in the
Riccomini published in 2012. There are issues, challenges, and demands everywhere. Many
times, it has been reported that math students have trouble solving problems. Therefore, the
primary goal of this study was to create models that might address students' issues in problem
solving by utilizing their coping mechanisms. In particular, it sought to ascertain the students'
coping mechanisms along the four stages of problem solving—understanding the issue (UP),
coming up with a plan (DP), putting the plan into action (CP), and looking back (LB)—
according to a) gender and b) academic programs, specifically: The study used a case-study
as “given” in STEM education” Many occupations, notably those in science, technology, and
challenging, and as a result, many students drop out of STEM (science, technology,
engineering, and mathematics) subjects, closing the door to jobs in such fields. In this
editorial, we contend that the traditional notion of mathematics as a "given" or "fixed" subject
for students' anticipated acquisition alienates many students and calls for problematization.
We suggest an alternate strategy for reforming mathematics instruction and demonstrate how
In the thematic analysis of the recent study of Arnold Pascua (2015), revealed that the
word problems which place a greater emphasis on the students’ abilities to understand the
situation and use the best approach to come up with the solution are frequently linked to
problem-problem. A teacher made-test was employed in the study. For the purpose of
analyzing the sources of the pupil’s difficulty, simple frequency and percent were used. The
findings indicated that some pupils had trouble articulating the issue. A student who
effectively portrayed the issue was able to generate the right equation and ultimately arrive at
employing the word matching method, some of those who did not try to express the problem
at all and others who did not represent it correctly can also come up with the right euqation.
This method, which cannot be used in the number problem since it uses a less inconsistent
problem, is not relevant in that case. There were very few students that had trouble solving
equations.
According to Genesis Camarista (2015), the study looks at how well sixth-graders
from a few Iloilo elementary schools perform when solving mathematics problems in terms
of inventiveness, self-efficacy, and anxiety. Based on their cognitive abilities and sense of
self-efficacy, the participants were divided into High Potential Mathematically Gifted
(HPMG) and Low Potential Mathematically Gifted (LPMG). The Mathematical Creativity
Solving Test (MPS), and Parental Support Rating Scale (PSRS) were among the tools
employed in the study. The findings revealed that all endognous factors were highly
influenced by cognitive capacity, but parental support predicted self-efficacy and anxiety.
The influenced of cognitive capacity and parental support was mediated by self-efficacy,
anxiety, and creativity, with their respective total impacts on problem-solving performance
being larger than their direct effects. According to the study, mathematically gifted students
have average creativity, problem-solving skills, good cognitive capacity, self-efficacy, and
low anxiety. Parental support predicts these factors, but cognitive capacity significantly
impacts performance.