Design of Seismic Force Resisting System for a Single-Story Steel Structure (building layout shown in the figure) using

the
following structural systems:

1. In the y direction: SMRF

2. In the x direction: SCBF and EBF

Given :
Building Length, p ≔ 39.5 m
Building Width, l ≔ 7.11 m
Building Height, h ≔ 3.5 m
Column Spacing, Sc ≔ 7.9 m
Beam Spacing, Sb ≔ 2.37 m
kN kN
Location : Bandung Dead Load, DL ≔ 3.5 ―― Live Load, LL ≔ 2.5 ――
Site Class : SD m2 m2

Steel Column Properties

ProfileC ≔ W14 x 82
kN
Ac = 0.015 m 2 Ixc = ⎛⎝3.667 ⋅ 10 -4⎞⎠ m 4 Iyc = ⎛⎝6.16 ⋅ 10 -5⎞⎠ m 4 Wnc = 1.197 ――
m
dc = 0.362 m Sxc = 0.002 m 3 Syc = ⎛⎝4.801 ⋅ 10 -4⎞⎠ m 3
twc = 0.013 m rxc = 0.154 m ryc = 0.063 m k1c = 0.027 m
bfc = 0.257 m Zxc = ⎛⎝5.786 ⋅ 10 -5⎞⎠ m 4 Zyc = ⎛⎝1.865 ⋅ 10 -5⎞⎠ m 4 kdesc = 0.037 m
tfc = 0.022 m

Steel Beam Properties

ProfileB ≔ W 12 x 45
kN
Ab = 0.008 m 2 Ixb = ⎛⎝1.448 ⋅ 10 -4⎞⎠ m 4 Iyb = ⎛⎝2.081 ⋅ 10 -5⎞⎠ m 4 Wnb = 0.657 ――
m
db = 0.307 m Sxb = ⎛⎝9.455 ⋅ 10 -4⎞⎠ m 3 Syb = ⎛⎝2.032 ⋅ 10 -4⎞⎠ m 3
twb = 0.009 m rxb = 0.131 m ryb = 0.05 m k1b = 0.024 m
bfb = 0.204 m Zxb = ⎛⎝2.672 ⋅ 10 -5⎞⎠ m 4 Zyb = ⎛⎝7.908 ⋅ 10 -6⎞⎠ m 4 kdesb = 0.027 m
tfb = 0.015 m

1. Structural Modeling
2. Calculating the Load Due to Secondary and Perimeter Beams for the Simplification of 2D Frame Loading
Perimeter Beam

Sb kN Sb kN
WL2 ≔ LL ⋅ ―= 2.963 ―― WD2 ≔ DL ⋅ ―+ Wnb = 4.804 ――
2 m 2 m

Sc Sc
PL2 ≔ WL2 ⋅ ―= 11.702 kN PD2 ≔ WD2 ⋅ ―= 18.977 kN
2 2

Secondary Beam

kN
WL1 ≔ LL ⋅ Sb = 5.925 ――
m
kN
WD1 ≔ DL ⋅ Sb + Wnb = 8.952 ――
m

Sc
PD1 ≔ WD1 ⋅ ―= 35.359 kN
2
Sc
PL1 ≔ WL1 ⋅ ―= 23.404 kN
2

3. Calculating Limit States with Consideration of 2 Load Combination

Combination 1 = 1,2 D + 1,6 L
PU1.1 ≔ 1.2 ⋅ PD1 + 1.6 ⋅ PL1 = 79.877 kN
PU1.2 ≔ 1.2 ⋅ PD2 + 1.6 ⋅ PL2 = 41.495 kN

With the help of structural analysis software, the following values

are obtained,
MCD1 ≔ -95.536 kN ⋅ m MFE1 ≔ -95.536 kN ⋅ m

MCA1 ≔ -95.536 kN ⋅ m MFB1 ≔ -95.536 kN ⋅ m

MDC1 ≔ 94.820 kN ⋅ m MEF1 ≔ 94.820 kN ⋅ m HA1 ≔ 27.296 kN HB1 ≔ 27.296 kN

VA1 ≔ 122.256 kN VB1 ≔ 122.256 kN

MAC1 ≔ 0 kN·m MBF1 ≔ 0 kN ⋅ m

Combination 2 = 1,2 D +1,0 E+ 0,5 L

Combination 2 = 1,2 D +1,0 E+ 0,5 L
Analysis Assumptions:
Type of building use : Industrial building
Risk category : II
Location : Bandung
Site class : SD (Moderate Soil)

From https://rsa.ciptakarya.pu.go.id/, the following parameters are known:

I≔1 SS ≔ 1.1209 S1 ≔ 0.4928 PGA ≔ 0.4983
T0 ≔ 0.15 s Ts ≔ 0.75 s Sds ≔ 0.79 Sd1 ≔ 0.59

Based on these parameters, the Seismic Design Category for short period acceleration response and 1 second period falls
into Category D (according to SNI 1726-2019 Table 8 and 9).

Factors R, Cd dan Ωo for seismic force resisting system (SNI 1726-2019 Table 12),
R≔8 Cd ≔ 5.5
ρ ≔ 1.3 Ω0 ≔ 3

The values of the parameters for the Ct and x approximations (SNI 1726-2019 Table 18),
Ct ≔ 0.0724 x ≔ 0.8

Fundamental period approximation, Ta

Ta ≔ Ct ⋅ hn x = 0.197

Seismic response coefficient, Cs

Sds ⋅ I
Cs ≔ ――= 0.099
R
Sd1 ⋅ I ⎛ Sd1 ⋅ I ⎞
――= 0.374 , 0.044 ⋅ Sds ⋅ I = 0.035 if ⎜0.044 ⋅ Sds ⋅ I ≤ Cs ≤ ――, “OK” , “Check”⎟ = “OK”
R ⋅ Ta ⎝ R ⋅ Ta ⎠
Calculating the total weight of the structure, W
Weight due to dead load, wdl ≔ DL ⋅ p ⋅ l = 982.96 kN
Weight due to live load, wll ≔ 30% ⋅ LL ⋅ p ⋅ l = 210.63 kN
Weight due to perimeter beam, wpb ≔ Wnb ⋅ 2 ⋅ (p + l) = 61.22 kN
Weight due to secondary beam, wsb ≔ Wnb ⋅ 2 ⋅ p = 51.88 kN
Weight due to column, wc ≔ Wnc ⋅ h ⋅ 8 = 33.51 kN
Total weight, W ≔ wdl + wll + wpb + wsb + wc = 1340.2 kN

Seismic base shear, V

V ≔ Cs ⋅ W = 132.345 kN (Supported by 2 frames on the x-axis)

V
QE ≔ ―= 66.172 kN
2
Effect of horizontal seismic loads, Eh
Eh ≔ ρ ⋅ QE = 86.024 kN

Substitute the value of Eh into equation E,

E ⎝⎛QE , D⎠⎞ ≔ 0.2 ⋅ Sds ⋅ D + ρ ⋅ QE → 0.158 ⋅ D + 1.3 ⋅ QE

As a result, the combination of loads becomes,

Combination 2 = 1,2D + 1,0E + 0,5L

PU2.1 ≔ 1.358 ⋅ PD1 + 0.5 ⋅ PL1 = 59.72 kN
= 1,2D + 1,0 (0,158D+1, 3QE) + 0,5L
= 1,358D + 1, 3QE + 0,5L PU2.2 ≔ 1.358 ⋅ PD2 + 0.5 ⋅ PL2 = 31.621 kN

With the help of structural analysis software, the following values due to 1,358D + 0,5L are obtained,
With the help of structural analysis software, the following values due to 1,358D + 0,5L are obtained,

MCD2.1 ≔ -71.034 kN ⋅ m MFE2.1 ≔ -71.034 kN ⋅ m

MCA2.1 ≔ -71.034 kN ⋅ m MFB2.1 ≔ -71.034 kN ⋅ m

MDC2.1 ≔ 70.502 kN ⋅ m MEF2.1 ≔ 70.502 kN ⋅ m

HA2.1 ≔ 20.295 kN HB2.1 ≔ 20.295 kN

MAC2.1 ≔ 0 kN·m MBF2.1 ≔ 0 kN ⋅ m

VA2.1 ≔ 91.341 kN VB2.1 ≔ 91.341 kN

With the help of structural analysis software, the following values due to 1, 3QE are obtained,

MFC2.2 ≔ -150.523 kN ⋅ m

MCA2.2 ≔ 150.523 kN ⋅ m MEF2.2 = -50.174 kN ⋅ m

MFE2.2 ≔ -150.523 kN ⋅ m
MDC2.2 = -50.174 kN ⋅ m

MCD2.2 ≔ 150.523 kN ⋅ m

HA2.2 ≔ 43.017 kN HB2.2 ≔ 43.007 kN

MAC2.2 ≔ 0 kN·m MBF2.2 ≔ 0 kN ⋅ m

VA2.2 ≔ 42.347 kN VB2.2 ≔ 42.347 kN

The following moment values due to 1,358D + 1, 3QE + 0,5L are obtained,

MFE2 = -221.557 kN ⋅ m

MCD2 = 79.489 kN ⋅ m MFB2 = -221.557 kN ⋅ m

Total Moment,
MCA2 = 79.489 kN ⋅ m MEF2 = 20.328 kN ⋅ m MAC2 ≔ MAC2.1 + MAC2.2 = 0 kN ⋅ m
MCA2 ≔ MCA2.1 + MCA2.2 = 79.489 kN ⋅ m
MDC2 = 20.328 kN ⋅ m MCD2 ≔ MCD2.1 + MCD2.2 = 79.489 kN ⋅ m
MDC2 ≔ MDC2.1 + MDC2.2 = 20.328 kN ⋅ m
MEF2 ≔ MEF2.1 + MEF2.2 = 20.328 kN ⋅ m
MFE2 ≔ MFE2.1 + MFE2.2 = -221.557 kN ⋅ m
MFB2 ≔ MFB2.1 + MFE2.2 = -221.557 kN ⋅ m
MBF2 ≔ MBF2.1 + MBF2.2 = 0 kN ⋅ m
MAC2 = 0 kN ⋅ m MBF2 = 0 kN ⋅ m