EE project

Rubric for Final report: Application track

Group names:

Score 0.00

Sections Weight Score (10 scales)

0 Format 8.0% Report format 8.0%
1.1 Introduction 9.0% Project Overview 2.0%
1.2 Project introduction 2.0%
1.3 The reasons of selecting project 2.0%
1.5 Project's objectives 1.0%
1.6 Project's limitations 1.0%
1.7 Report's outlines 1.0%
2.1 Introduction about project 10.0% Demand analysis (Choose a project or investment scenario to analyze. This could be a real-world engineering project, a hypothetical investment 5.0%
2.2 Define the decision that your team needs to address ̣and relevant factors? 5.0%
3.1 Development of alternatives 20.0% Collect relevant data and define viable solution alternatives 20.0%
4.1 Make realistic cash flow estimates 10.0% Account for all costs, including initial investment costs, operating costs, maintenance costs, and potential revenue streams. 5.0%
4.2 Create cash flow estimates for each alternative. Include both inflows and outflows over the project's lifespan. 5.0%
5.1 Identify an economic measure of worth 10.0% Identify an appropriate economic measure of worth for decision making ̣̣̣(NPV, IRR, PP,… 5.0%
5.2 criterion for decision making Explain why
Consider bothyou selectedand
economic thisnon-economic
criterion and how it aligns
factors when with the project's
evaluating objectives.These non-economic factors may include environmental impact,
the alternatives. 5.0%
6.1 Analysis and comparison of alternatives. 15.0% social
Calculate and compareand
considerations, thetechnical
values forfeasibility.
each alternative. 5.0%
6.2 5.0%
6.3 Perform sensitivity analysis if needed to assess how changes in key parameters impact the project's economic viability 5.0%
7 Selection of the best alternative. 5.0% Make a clear recommendation regarding the best alternative 5.0%
8 Implement the solution 5.0% Implement the solution; monitoring and post-evaluation of results. 5.0%
9 Improvements 4.0% Lesson learned and discussions 4.0%
10 Conclusions 4.0% Conclusions 4.0%
11 Creatives ( Max +1 score)
12 Bonus ( Max +1 score) - Reason
100.0%
 SCORING RUBRICS FOR PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATIONS
Group
Score 0.80
Bonus
Time Mins Secs
100% 15 15
1 8% Time control (mins) 15 10
Well done (9-10) 15 ± 10% mins
Acceptable (7-8) 15 ± 20% mins
Some Weaknesses (5-6) 15 ± 30% mins
Problematic (0-4) More than 31%
2 5% Introduction: Does the presentation address the intended audience?
Well done (9-10) Content, structure, and language of presentation geared to intended audience

Acceptable (7-8) Presentation is missing some content required by audience; some language used inappropriately (e.g., unfamiliar jargon,
too much jargon)
Some Weaknesses (5-6) Presentation is missing a substantial portion of content required by audience; uses some inappropriate orineffective
language
Problematic (0-4) No organization apparent; content of presentation reflects interests of speaker but not of audience; inappropriate use of
language
3 5% Structure: Does the organization reflect the purpose of the presentation and the needs of the audience?
Well done (9-10) Appropriate use of direct/indirect structure; presentation organized according to audience’s needs; relationship between
ideas clear; strong introduction and conclusion
Acceptable (7-8) Structure either too direct or too indirect; organization is evident but may be undermined by weak transitions or
occasional digressions; introduction or conclusion does not accomplish its intended function
Some Weaknesses (5-6) Direct or indirect structure used inappropriately; organization is confusing or unclear; weak introduction or conclusion

Problematic (0-4) No discernible organization; thoughts in random order without connections between them

4 15% Content/Support/Evidence: Is the evidence used to support the argument concrete, relevant, credible, accurate, and sufficient?
Well done (9-10) Argument is clearly supported by accurate evidence considered credible by the audience; sufficient detail to support the
main points of the document
Acceptable (7-8) Many details support argument, but some are not fully elaborated or sufficiently specific; some evidence not relevant

Some Weaknesses (5-6) Some evidence is provided, but data not fully explained, relevant to the argument, or credible; important pieces of
evidence have not been included; some data inaccurate
Problematic (0-4) Little or no data to support the main ideas of the argument; much of the data is inaccurate

5 9% Delivery/Oral: How strong are the oral components of the presentation?

Well done (9-10) Speaker is fluent and poised; uses language comfortably and appropriately; speaks at an effective rate and volume; few
fillers
Acceptable (7-8) Some degree of nervousness apparent; minor problems with language usage; speaker may speak too slowly or quickly,
too loudly or softly; fillers are noticeable
Some Weaknesses (5-6) Speaker seems uncomfortable; several problems with language usage; speaker speaking much too slowly or quickly, too
loudly or softly; fillers are noticeable
Problematic (0-4) Speaker is unable to deliver presentation coherently

6 9% Delivery/Nonverbal: How strong are the nonverbal components of the presentation?

Well done (9-10) Speaker uses gestures comfortably in line with his/her own style; eye contact is appropriate for audience; use of space
appropriate for the situation
Acceptable (7-8) Speaker gesturing too much or too little; eye contact may be slightly too much or too little; speaker may be moving
around a little too much or not quite enough
Some Weaknesses (5-6) Speaker gesturing too much or too little; using distracting gestures (e.g., playing with a ring); not enough eye contact;
inappropriate use of space
Problematic (0-4) Nonverbal components of the presentation distract from ability of the audience to receive the message

7 9% Visual Aids: Do the visual aids reinforce the message and add to the effectiveness of the presentation? (Slide design)
Well done (9-10) Appropriate visual aids are used; visual aids serve as a complement to the speaker and the message to be delivered;
designed effectively; speaker uses visual aid easily
Acceptable (7-8) Appropriate visual aids are used; a few weaknesses in design; a few difficulties with use

Some Weaknesses (5-6) Choice of visual aid is poor; weaknesses with design; difficulties with use

Problematic (0-4) Inappropriate choice of visual aid; design detracts from speaker’s ability to deliver the message; inability of speaker to
use visual aid.
8 10% Team works and communications
Well done (9-10) 100% of team members work together.

Acceptable (7-8) 70% of team members work together.

Some Weaknesses (5-6) 50% of team members work together.

Problematic (0-4) Others

9 30% Questions and Answers: Has the speaker handled the Q&A portion of the presentation competently?
Well done (9-10) Speaker answers questions knowledgeably, thoroughly, and concisely; process is handled smoothly

Acceptable (7-8) Speaker has some difficulty answering questions concisely; some problems responding to some questions (e.g., hostile
questions, aggressive questions)
Some Weaknesses (5-6) Speaker is thrown off balance by questions; has difficulty responding to some questioners

Problematic (0-4) Speaker is unable to answer questions; loses control of the process