GED1
GED1
Basic Principles and Characteristics of Memorandum according to Sharma, 2014: CHAPTER 5 COMMUNICATION FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES
Necessary and Sufficient Information Lesson 1: Avoiding Plagiarism
Do not Assume that Everyone knows Everything related to the issue discussed in the Memo Be Clear, Topics:
Concrete and Specific ,Easy-to-Understand,Explain with Ease and Co-operation,NO Emotional Appeal. - Quoting
- Plagiarism
The following are the uses of Memorandum according to Sharma, 2014: - Paraphrasing
To Provide Information - Summarizing
To Issue Instruction Lesson 2: Writing a Research Proposal: The Topic Proposal
To Convey Policy Decision Research
To Offer/Invite Suggestion Research involves a scientific method which uses logical and systematic
To Record/Report an Agreement procedure for the acquisition of new knowledge or for the verification or
To Establish Accountability confirmation of previews and existing knowledge to answer problems and
Helps you to avoid meeting personally, when necessary to apply in practical life.
Types of Research
Pure Research
These are the guidelines in making Memorandums: ● The researcher tries to find the truth
Short as possible and concise. ● The research meant to seek knowledge simply for knowledge’s sake
Use simple English. ● Also termed as library or desk research
Avoid using jargons. Applied Research
Use a captivating Heading by bolding or using different colors for the heading. ● Practical application of knowledge
Be aware of the important information that needs to be included in the memorandum. to everyday situations.
Be aware of the grammars and spelling. ● Also termed as action research
Anticipate any questions your readers might have. Quantitative Research
● Associated with positivist tradition (there is reality out there that can be studied and known) o Forced choice ratings
● Gathers numerical values as its data o Checklists
● Investigates concepts, constructs, variables o Calendar
● Use deductive reasoning o Visual analogue
● Use control (imposing condition so that biases are minimized and validity and precision are maximized) ● Two Types of Questionnaire Items
● Gather empirical evidence (from objective reality collected through senses) 1. The free response questions or “open-ended” or unstructured Questionnaire
Qualitative Research ● The questions frequently asked are why, what and how
● Associated with Naturalistic inquiry (reality is not a fixed entity but rather a construction of individual 2. The “close-ended” or structured form of Questionnaire
participating in research.) ● Has the response already prepared, the respondents merely checks, underlines or
● Gathers narrative description as its data ranks the responses as directed
● Investigates phenomena, and concepts The Interview
● Use inductive process ● Is the second most common method for data collection
● Use subjectivity that enriches the analytical insights ● It is a purposeful face to face relationship between two persons, one of whom called the interviewer who
● Gather information, insights that lead to search for further evidence (subjective) takes place in asks questions to gather information and the other called interviewee or respondent who supplies the
the field information asked for
Purposes and Uses of Interview
Lesson 3: Writing a Research Proposal: The Introduction 1. The researcher may interview knowledgeable people to enable to gain insight into his problem
- How to Write Research Introduction 2. The researcher may interview knowledgeable people about the proper construction and validation of
The introduction is a generalized discussion which should lead to actually stating and clearly articulating questionnaire
the research problem. Thus, the introduction provides a background that establishes the status of the 3. In case when the subject has some signs of abnormality, the interviewer may wish to gain physical and
problem in context. The background of the study that functions in terms of the following: emotional reactions of the subjects
1. It establishes the problem by describing its nature, and narrating its development, occurrence or 4. Interview can be used as a principal tool in gathering data or just to supplement data collected by other
existence. techniques
2. It situates the problem by describing the setting where the problem is conceived. This actually refers to What to Avoid in Interviews
the local setting where the respondents have directly experienced the problem. It sets the status of the 1. Avoid exerting undue pressure upon a respondent to make him participate in an interview
problem. 2. Avoid disagreeing or arguing with or contradicting the respondent
3. It explains the rationale of the problem by justifying the necessity for conducting the study. 3. Avoid unduly pressing the respondent to make a reply
Study the following sample introduction to determine how they are developed. The introduction is a 4. Avoid using a language well over and above the ability of the respondent to understand
generalized discussion which should lead to actually stating and clearly articulating the research problem. 5. Avoid talking about irrelevant matters
Thus, the introduction provides a background that establishes the status of the problem in context. The 6. Avoid placing the interviewee in embarrassing situations
background of the study that functions in terms of the following: 7. Avoid appearing too high above the respondent in education, knowledge and social status
1. It establishes the problem by describing its nature, and narrating its development, occurrence or 8. Avoid interviewing the respondent in an unholy hour
existence. Observation
2. It situates the problem by describing the setting where the problem is conceived. This actually refers to ● Is the most direct means of studying the subjects when the researcher is interested in their behavior
the local setting where the respondents have directly experienced the problem. It sets the status of the ● Perceiving the data through the senses
problem.
3. It explains the rationale of the problem by justifying the necessity for conducting the study. Recording the Results of Observation
● Checklist
Study the following sample introduction to determine how they are developed. ● Is a device which contains the items to be observed and a space for number or checkmarks or short
Lesson 4: Writing a Research Proposal: The Method verbal entries
The Questionnaire ● Rating scale
● Is a form prepared and distributed to secure responses to questions that are intended to ● Is a checklist with an evaluation standard
obtain information about conditions or practices on which the respondent is presumed to have ● Anecdotal forms
knowledge ● Is a checklist that provides for less breakdown of dimensions or factors hence, much space is provided
● Questionnaire can be provided as paper-and-pencil device, a telephone survey, or a for writing
structured document uploaded onto the internet ● Mechanical Recording
● The questionnaire format could be: ● Stenographic Recording
o Dichotomous (yes/no) Records
o Multiple choice ● Provide a readily available and valuable source of data
o Cafeteria ● Three major criteria necessary to establish authenticity and accuracy of records:
o Rank order ◦ Authorship- the identity of the person who conceived the material
◦ Body- the outward form of the material Association) or the APA (American Psychological Association) writing style.
◦ Function- purpose for which it was complied 2. Use a minimum of three (3) scholarly sources: e.g., Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Political
Issues, academic books, journals, newspapers and magazines, etc.
Lesson 5: Writing Literary Analysis 3. Use subheadings as you begin each section.
The review of related literature is a written summary of the existing knowledge base on a research 4. Have a separate title or cover page, and just staple all the pages together
problem obtained from an in-depth search on non-research references and research references. The review
includes a statement indicating what the present study will add to what is already known. It is a written, Lesson 7: Academic Presentation
analytic summary of research findings on a topic of interest It is a comprehensive compilation of what is Academic Presentation
known about the phenomenon. It provides the background and the context on which the research is 1. Determine the purpose for presenting your research at the forum.
conducted 2. Focus on Forecasting what you want to share with the audience about your research; on Explaining the
1. Conceptual Literature/Related Literature key findings of your study; Synthesizing your research in relation to the statement of the problem
● It is composed of discussions of facts and principles to which the present study is related 3. Know your audience in terms of their background knowledge, research interests or
● These materials are usually printed and found in books, encyclopedias, professional journals, experience.
magazines, newspapers, and other publications 4. Get ready with your outline and cue cards.
● Also referred to as non-empirical references
● Are classified as local and foreign The Three P’s of an Academic Presentation
1. Prepare Organize one’s content. Relevant to audience’s needs
2. Research Literature/Related Studies 2. Practice Great delivery of the presentation
● These are studies, inquiries, or investigations already conducted to which present proposed study is 3. Present Well thought speech .Must be comfortable when presenting
related or has some bearing or similarity
● These are usually unpublished materials such as manuscripts, theses, and dissertations
● Also referred to as empirical references
● Are classified as local and foreign
Sources of Literature
Empirical References may be of primary and secondary sources:
1. Primary Source
● Description of studies written by the researchers who conducted them
● It is ideal to rely heavily on primary sources of data
● The researcher’s oral discussion of his study in research forums, seminars,
conferences, and even competitions, may also be considered primary sources
2. Secondary Source
● Descriptions of studies prepared by someone other than the original researcher
● Secondary source documents are a good way to start a literature review with because they provide a
quick summary and a good bibliography