Iarjel 2021
Iarjel 2021
Iarjel 2021
Vocabulary is mentioned in curriculum 2013 that students should master 3000 words for SMK or SMA levels.
According to Hasan (2006), most of students who graduated from SMA or SMK have studied English for 6 years in the
school cannot use the language for communication.
Since vocabulary is so vital in our life, the issue of vocabulary acquisition is important to English teachers who have
to make various decisions or ways of enriching English language learners‟ vocabulary. Some teachers always think that
vocabulary learning is easy but language learners have a serious problem remembering a large amount of vocabulary
necessary to achieve their language fluency. “Vocabulary is the most sizeable and unmanageable component in the
learning of any language, whether a foreign or one‟s mother tongue” because of “tens of thousands of different
meanings,” according to (Hague, 1987, p. 219).
1
Dini Chalista Sari & Sugeng Susilo Adi; Int Aca J Edu Lte; Vol-2, Iss-4 (July-Auug, 2021): 1-4.
During the Researchers‟s teaching experience in Thirdly, it is getting the word meaning. In this step,
SMKN 1 Batu, problem was found on English teaching the students ask native speaker what the words means
and learning process. The students faced a problem in and explain it. It means that the students try to find the
mastering vocabulary. The reading and English meaning of the word by asking someone who knows the
examination scores is relatively low because the meaning the word well. Consolidating word form and
students lack of vocabulary. This statement is proofed meaning in memory is the next step. There are many
by the students examination scores that less from the kinds of vocabulary learning drilling, such as flashcard,
kriteria ketuntasan minimal (KKM). Due to the existed crossword, puzzle, etc. It means that the students should
problem, the Researchers conducts a survey on do drills to remember about the word. And the last, it is
vocabulary learning strategy used by first year students using the word. Some people would argue that this step
of Hospitality Program in SMKN 1 Batu. The is not necessary if the learners only know the meaning
Researchers has some reasons to conduct this research of the words. However, the students have to use the
in Hospitality Program. word in a sentence or in a phrase, so it can help the
students know how the word should be placed.
Hospitality Program is one of program that has a
lowest score in English examination so the Researchers Some students argue that one of the factors that they
can inform the teacher about the use of vocabulary faced in learning English is because the lack of
learning strategies, so the teacher can determine vocabularies. Thornbury, (2004: 27) proposes some
effective method to solve the problem in vocabulary factors that make some words more difficult as follows
mastery. Second, for Hospitality students whose mother pronunciation, spelling, length and complexity,
tongue is not English, mastering English is more grammar, and meaning. Pronunciation problem is like
important not only for the students‟ academic life but when we hear some similar sound in two words which
also for their perspective career. Most of students in this have the different meaning. Spelling problem is also
expertise program prefer to continue to work rather than important because it can improve students‟ ability in
go to college. Inevitably, they must have good reading and writing. There are some spelling problems,
communication skills, especially in English to support for the example are misunderstanding between speaker
their career. and interlocutor and students do not know the spelling
of word. When students make mistake in spelling it
In addition, since the students are in the first year means that they tend to write or spell like their
they can improve their vocabulary in the rest of years pronounce it. The next problem is length and
which are in the 2nd and 3rd years. The students use a complexity. Long words seem to be more difficult to
guide book to learn English as a foreign language. The learn than the short ones. But, as a rule of thumb, high
guide book‟s content refers to curriculum 2013 (K13) frequency words tend to be short in English, therefore
which present vocabulary building in every chapter. By the learner is likely to meet them more often, a factor
conducting this survey, it will be useful for students to favoring their “learnability”. Grammar is also the
use effective strategy in learning process by using the problem when a problematic thing is the grammar
guide book. With such existing issues, it is apparent associated with the word, especially if this differs from
that a problem has presented itself to those concerned its L1 equivalent. And lastly, meaning problem. Some
with vocabulary learning strategies and vocabulary of learners are difficult to understand the meaning of
knowledge. The mentioned concern has driven the English word because in a word may has more than one
Researchers to draw on the idea of designing this study. meaning.
3
Dini Chalista Sari & Sugeng Susilo Adi; Int Aca J Edu Lte; Vol-2, Iss-4 (July-Auug, 2021): 1-4.
obtained the value of r count for each item fulfilling the
METHOD requirements of> 0.396 so that 20 items were valid and
The research design for this study was quantitative could be continued to collect the major data. The results
method and used a questionnaire as the instrument. This of the instrument reliability test with Cronbach Alpha
study obtained the data from first year students in on the question of questionnaire obtained the Cronbach
hospitality program of SMKN 1 Batu in English class. Alpha value fulfilling the requirements, namely> 0.600
The Researchers collected the data for a total time so that the variables used were reliable.
around 10-15 minutes after the class was over. Students
were asked to fill the questionnaire. The data was FINDINGS
collected once the questionnaire had been The questionnaires were distributed to students of
first year at SMK Negeri 1 Batu who enrolled in
The instrument of this study was questionnaire English class. It was done on February 20 th 2019. The
focuses on vocabulary learning strategies of 155 EFL total of respondent involved in this research was 155
students. The questionnaire had been written in students. This study was designed to obtain answers of
Indonesian language. The data was collected from first the mentioned research questions formulated above
grade students of SMKN 1 Batu in English class. In through a questionnaire that administered to the
this study, the data is collected using a closed-ended participants‟ by recalling their vocabulary learning
questionnaire as described in the research instrument. strategies. The results of the study have been reported in
The questionnaire was distributed to the sample with the following order: the first result is talking about the
the help of the English teachers at the school, the overall vocabulary learning strategy that is used by the
questionnaire was administered to the students during participants of the study. Then, the study discusses each
an English lesson. The completion of the questionnaire strategy type such as: cognitive, metacognitive,
took approximately about ten to fifteen minutes. The memory, and determination strategy.
results of the validity test of the instrument with
Pearson Correlation on the question questionnaire
The interesting thing that can be seen in the figure is ability grade scales in English. From the data that is
that students who got a higher score use the four obtained the most by students is determination strategy
learning strategies more frequently than students who (55.4%) and the low frequency is cognitive strategy
got a lower score as indicated by the higher proportions (3.1%).
of students selecting the two options; sometimes and
always. In line with the research problem that are
vocabulary learning strategies used by first year
As seen in the table 1, there is a larger proportion of students of SMK Negeri 1 Batu, the Researchers shows
the use of determination strategy (55.4%) which two important points. The first was overall result
belonged to the high ability scale (grade 70-100). Most learning vocabulary strategies used by students. The
of students who are on the medium ability scale (grade second was the students‟ use of four vocabulary
40-69) also using determination strategy (50.6%) and learning strategies which explained about level of use
the last students who reach low ability scale (grade 0- for each strategy (MEM, MET, COG, DET) which
39) use memory strategies (40.0%). indicated whether it was high, medium, or low usage
that give impact with their English test scores. Those
The higher frequency of strategy use and the variety points were explained in the four sub-chapters
of strategy types may have contributed to the larger respectively.
proportions of the students who achieving the higher
4
Dini Chalista Sari & Sugeng Susilo Adi; Int Aca J Edu Lte; Vol-2, Iss-4 (July-Auug, 2021): 1-4.
Based on the objectives of the study, this study was Metacognitive strategies (MET) consisted of 5
conducted to investigate the use of the four vocabulary statements (statements number 4,6,11,17, and 19). The
learning strategies (memory strategy, cognitive strategy, students seem to favor learning new vocabulary through
metacognitive strategy and determination strategy) and non-conventional mode of learning such as learning
vocabulary learning strategies mostly used by the from TV, music, and the internet. Most of students that
students. The Researchers measured the students‟ achieve a higher scores use this strategy to learn
vocabulary learning strategies by using VLS vocabulary, mostly they learn a new words from TV,
questionnaire adopted from Takac (2008). music or internet. It appears that receptive mode of
learning vocabulary such as listening and watching TV
Figure 1 presents the general patterns of VLS by the are more preferable to productive mode such as writing
participants (155 students) under cognitive, or using new words themselves. This finding seems to
metacognitive, memory, and determination strategies. confirm Nation‟s (2000) assertion that producing or
In terms of those strategy types, the most frequently using new words in writing or speaking would put more
used strategy was determination strategy (51.6%), then cognitive effort than listening or watching new words
memory strategy (24.5%), metacognitive strategy used by other speakers. In line with this finding the
(17.4%) and the least frequently used strategy was Researchers expect that the students‟ receptive
cognitive strategy (13.26%). Based on the score ranges vocabulary should gradually increase as the amount of
of students in English test, students that obtain a high learning or instruction at school increases.
score mostly using determination strategies, followed
by metacognitive strategies, then memory strategies and Memory strategies (MEM) consisted of 5 statements
latest cognitive strategies. (statements number 8,9,10,15, and 16) relating new
materials to previous knowledge, it refers how the
Determination Strategies (DET) consisted of 2 students remember the new words (e.g., remember new
statements (statements number 13 and 14) and it refers words by reading loudly or making a connection with
when students faced new words with additional help. words they already know). According to the finding of
Most of students that achieve a high scores use this this study the students that achieve a medium to low
strategies because they always using dictionary or scores also using this strategy the students think that
translate new vocabulary to learn English. In this study, learn vocabulary by making a picture or reading a new
determination strategy sub-categorized two strategies: vocabulary loudly will takes a more time. According to
using a dictionary and translation. Determination Schmitt (2000, p.132), the process of memorizing new
strategies make learners guess from the textual context. words involves finding some pre-existing information
As English is still a foreign language in Indonesia and it in the long-term memory to connect the new
is used in the formal situations, as a result, mostly information to.
participants use more frequently bilingual dictionaries
(English to Indonesian or Indonesian to English) than a The last is cognitive strategies (COG), it consisted
monolingual dictionary (English to English). In of 8 statements (statements number 1,2,3,5,7,12,18,20)
Schmitt‟s (1997) VLS taxonomy, determination these strategies focus on manipulation and
strategy refers to the discovery of word meaning such transformation of the target language by the learner. It
as what students do when they come across new words. appears that the students relied heavily on classroom
activities when the teachers wrote new words on the
board but the students seemed to place little values of
organizing new words they learned in another form
such as small pocket dictionaries. As Loucky (2002)
2
Dini Chalista Sari & Sugeng Susilo Adi; Int Aca J Edu Lte; Vol-2, Iss-4 (July-Auug, 2021): 1-4.
stated that, the students in his study took more time to This study was supported by several theories discuss
learn words in traditional dictionaries compared to similar topic that was vocabulary learning strategies.
learning words using electronic dictionaries. The Yang‟s (2008) study, the students in this study also
students in this present study have been familiar to revealed that they made use of bilingual dictionaries
electronic dictionaries that are more preferable and which offer an easier way of memorizing word
convenient to traditional bilingual dictionaries. meanings through translation. In fact, according to
O‟Malley et al., (1985), translation is an effective
The researchers compared the finding of this study strategy to use with students at the beginner and
with the previous studies that discussed the same topic intermediate levels of English learning. Astika‟s (2016)
that was vocabulary learning strategies for EFL shown that the students appear to rely more on
learners. The first previous study was conducted by determination strategies.
Yang‟s (2008) study, the students in this study also
revealed that they made use of bilingual dictionaries The finding of this research can be useful for them
which offer an easier way of memorizing word who want to conduct survey study on students‟
meanings through translation. In fact, according to vocabulary learning strategies. The future Researchers
O‟Malley et al., (1985), translation is an effective can consider the wider data to get more various
strategy to use by students at the beginner and analyses by considering other characteristics
intermediate levels of English learning. Astika‟s (2016) background. Moreover, the future Researchers can
shown that the students appear to rely more on provide test to get a complementary data. Since
determination strategies. The strategies that the students vocabulary learning strategies is important in English
believed they used could be based on how they learned learning process, future Researchers can also
vocabulary in the class. investigate the factors that create students employ
different strategies in learning vocabulary.
CONCLUSION
The objective of this study was finding out the REFERENCE
vocabulary learning strategies used by the first year 1. Ahour, T., & Salamzadeh, P. (2014). Vocabulary
students of SMK Negeri 1 Batu as EFL (English as a learning strategies used by poor Iranian high school
Foreign Language) learners. The instrument of this students. International Journal of Language
study was questionnaire adopted from Takac (2008) Teaching and Research, 2, 12–15.
namely VLQS that consisted of 20 statements divided 2. Annisa, I. (2017). Attractive media for teaching
into 5 statements of memory strategies (MEM), 8 vocabulary to lower class of young learners.
statements of cognitive strategies (COG) and 5 JESS(Journal of English Educators Society, 3(2),
statements of metacognitive strategies (MET) and 2 141-154
statements of determination strategies (DET). 3. Astika, Gusti (2016). Vocabulary learning
strategies of secondary school students.
On the basis of analysis and interpretation of the 4. Chalista, Dini. 2019. Exploring Vocabulary
research, the conclusion is presented as follows: Firstly, Learning Strategies Used by First Year Students of
there were a total of 155 questionnaires that were SMK Negeri 1 Batu. Unpublished Thesis. FIB,
completed by the respondents of this study. From the Universitas Brawijaya
finding of this study, students employed the four 5. Creswel, W. J. (2011). Educational research:
vocabulary learning strategies which were planning, conducting, evaluating quantitative and
determination strategies (DET) 51.6%, memory qualitative research (4th Ed). Boston: Pearson
strategies (MEM) 24.5%, cognitive strategies (COG) Education.
6.5%, and metacognitive strategies (MET) 17.4%. 6. Gu, Y., & Johnson, R. K. (1996). Vocabulary
Learning Strategies and Language Learning
Secondly, the most frequently used by the students Outcomes.Language Learning., 46, 643-697.
identified from their English score test divided into 3 7. Hague, S.A. (1987). Vocabulary Instruction: What
categorizes. From the finding of this study based on the L2 can learn from L1. Foreign Language Annals,
result of students score in English examination the 20(3), 217-225
students that achieve a higher scores which is ranges 8. Harmer, J. (1991). The practice of English
from 70 to 100 mostly use determination strategy, and language teaching. Longman Handbooks for
students who have a medium score which is ranges Language Teachers.
from 40 to 69 is using memory and metacognitive 9. Kafipour, Reza. 2011. Vocabulary Learning
strategies. The last, students who achieve a lowest score Strategies and their Contribution to Reading
use cognitive strategy as their way to learn vocabulary. Comprehension of EFL Undergraduate Students in
Kerman Province. European Journal of Social
Sciences. 23(4).
2
Dini Chalista Sari & Sugeng Susilo Adi; Int Aca J Edu Lte; Vol-2, Iss-4 (July-Auug, 2021): 1-4.
10. Liao, Y. F. (2004). A survey study of Taiwan EFL 17. Rahmatika, A. (2016). Exploring EFL Learners’
freshmen vocabulary learning strategies. Journal Vocabulary Learning Strategies.
of National Pin-Tung Normal College, 21, 271-288 18. Rubin, J., Chamot, A., Harris, V., & Anderson, N.
11. Loucky, J. P. (2002). Improving access to target (2007). Intervening the use of strategies. In Cohen,
vocabulary using computerized bilingual A.D. and Macaro, E. (Eds.), Language learning
dictionaries. ReCALL, 14 (2), 295-314. strategies: thirty years of research and practice
(pp. 141-60). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Nayan, S. &Krishnasamy, H. N. (2015).A 19. Schmitt, N.(2000). Vocabulary in language
Preliminary Study on Vocabulary Learning teaching. Cambridge; Cambridge University Press.
Strategies Used by the Students from the Faculty of 20. Shuying. (2015).Vocabulary Learning Strategies of
Accountancy.International Journal of Language, Taiwanese EFL Senior High School Students.
Literature, and Linguistics, 1, 10-14. 21. Subon, F. (2013). Vocabulary Learning Strategies
13. Nirattisai, S., & Chiramanee, T. (2014). Employed by Form 6 Students. International
Vocabulary learning strategies of Thai university Journal of Scientific and Research Publications. 3
students and its relationship to vocabulary (6), 1-32.
size. International Journal of English Language 22. Takac, V. P. (2008). Vocabulary learning strategies
Education, 2(1), 273-287. and foreign language acquisition. Clevedon:
14. O‟Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner- Multilingual Matters.
Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. 23. Thorrbury, S. (2002). How to teach vocabulary.
(1985). Learning strategies used by beginning and England:Pearson Education limited.Ur,P.,(1998). A
intermediate ESL students. Language Learning, 35, course in language teaching.Cambridge University
21-46. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985. Press.
15. Patton, M.Q.(1990). Qualitative evaluation and 24. Yang, C.H. (2008). A study of journalistic
research methods (2nd.) vocabulary learning strategies by EFL college
16. Rabadi, R. I. (2016). Vocabulary Learning students. Journal of Meiho Istitude of Technology,
Strategies Employed by Undergraduate EFL 27(1), 43-60
Jordanian Students. English Language and
Literature Studies. 6, 47-58.