Aortic-Esophageal Fistula (AEF) - A Case Report
Aortic-Esophageal Fistula (AEF) - A Case Report
Aortic-Esophageal Fistula (AEF) - A Case Report
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51521/WJCRCI.2023.220117
CASE REPORT
Copyrights
© 2023, Mr. Davit Tetvadze, et al., This Keywords:
article is licensed under the Creative Aortic-Esophageal Fistula
Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-
Computed Tomography
4.0-International-License-(CCBY-NC)
(https://worldjournalofcasereports.org/b Vascular Surgery
logpage/copyright-policy). Usage and Minimally Invasive Operations
distribution for commercial purposes Aortic Aneurysm
require written permission. Esophagus, etc.,
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51521/WJCRCI.2023.220117
Pathogenesis
Atherosclerotic disease leading to intimomedial fat deposition is the
most common cause of loss of integrity of an otherwise intact vessel
wall. With the high pulsatile intravascular pressures, this
phenomenon gradually leads to aneurysmal growth. The weakened
aortic wall allows abnormal radial transmission of pulsatile pressure
to the surrounding soft tissues. This abnormal force causes pressure
necrosis and adhesive granulation tissue between the aorta and a
periaortic hollow or solid organ, resulting in a fistula (Picichè, R, &
A, 2003). A false aneurysm, or pseudoaneurysm, does not contain
wall layers and is more prone to sudden rupture instead of controlled
fistula development. A true aneurysm occurs due to weakening of
the wall of an otherwise intact blood vessel, in which case all three Figure 1: X-ray, Coronal plane, A – Blakemore tube esophageal
walls of the artery are thinned but intact. If AeF (Aortic-esophageal balloon, B – Gastric Baloon. The compression of esophageal balloon
Fistula) occurs during aortic intervention and/or aortic graft can’t be seen because of the plane
placement, it is termed a secondary fistula. The pathophysiology of
secondary fistulas is multifactorial and related to foreign body
reaction to the graft, graft cramping, infection, leakage coil
placement, etc.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51521/WJCRCI.2023.220117
interventions on the aorta must be performed. Recent studies showed It was necessary to mark the exact location. For this, endoscopists
that stent grafting is a promising technique for treatment of infiltrated the distal site of the esophagus with contrast to make the
esophageal perforation. However, the evidence of its benefits is still perforation area more visible (Figure 4).
scarce. Stent grafting seems to be an effective less invasive
technique for the treatment of esophageal perforation. It allows the
preservation of the esophagus in most of patients. (Biancari,
Tauriainen, & Tatu, 2017).
Research Conclusion
Fifty-three consecutive patients underwent stent grafting for
esophageal perforation at Oulu University Hospital, Finland. The
primary endpoint of this study was early and intermediate mortality.
Secondary outcome endpoints were the need for esophagectomy and
additional surgical procedures on the esophagus and
extraesophageal structures. Patients' mean age was 64.6 ± 13.4
years. The mean delay to primary treatment was 23 ± 27 h. The most
frequent cause of perforation was Boerhaave's syndrome (46.5%).
The thoraco-abdominal segment of the esophagus was affected in
58.1% of cases. Minor primary procedures were performed in 25
patients (58.1%) and repeat surgical procedures in 23 patients
(53.5%). repeat stent graftings were performed in 22 patients (50%).
Two patients (4.7%) underwent esophagectomy, one for unrelenting
preprocedural stricture of the esophagus and another for persistent
leakage of a perforated esophageal carcinoma. The mean length of
stay in the intensive care unit was 6.0 ± 7.5 days and the in-hospital
stay was 24.3 ± 19.6 days. In-hospital mortality was 4.6%. Three-
Figure 4: X-ray, Coronal plane. A – The contrast infiltrated area for
year survival was 67.2% (Biancari, Tauriainen, & Tatu, 2017). the better measurement of the perforation.
Stent Graft Implantation – Before esophageal stenting is started. The endoscopist was then free to perform esophageal stent-grafting
Under general anesthesia We isolated the femoral artery and passed (Figures 5,6).
the extra-stiff (Lunderquist) wires into the thoracic aorta to be ready
in case of bleeding. After this using endoscope esophagus lumen is
free. Large blood clots and fresh blood in the lumen. At 28
centimeters from the mouth, there is an ulcerated area of up to 1 cm.
Esophageal stenting was performed under X-ray control by inserting
a 24-Fr esophageal stent of Cook. The penetrated area is closed
without complications (Figure 3).
Figure 3: X-ray, Coronal plane. A – Extra-stiff wire (Lunderquist). B – Figure 5. X-ray, Coronal plane. A – 24fr esophageal
Endoscope to clarify and observe the exact localisation of the
perforation.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51521/WJCRCI.2023.220117
control, a catheter is inserted from the left brachial artery and the
‘’Pigtail’’ is brought to the exit of the left subclavian artery.
Angiography shows a cone-shaped pathological dilatation of the left
subclavian artery (Figure 8). The graft was placed in the distal
descending direction of the left subclavian artery. The stent-graft is
deployed. The rupture site was covered. Aneurysm is not contrasted
by control angiography. Extravasation does not occur (Figure 9).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.51521/WJCRCI.2023.220117
&
[email protected];
[email protected]