Two Problems With The Dark Night of San Juan de La Cruz
Two Problems With The Dark Night of San Juan de La Cruz
Two Problems With The Dark Night of San Juan de La Cruz
San Juan de la Cruz (Saint John of the Cross) is perhaps the first person ever
to write systematically about a phenomenon which he called “the dark night
of the soul.” I contend that this so-called “dark night” is a natural archetypal
spiritual phenomenon which appears in a number of spiritual traditions in one
form or another.
In this essay I am immodestly taking issue with the great San Juan. I will
claim that for the reasons I give, he may have failed to describe how to make
use of the complete potential inherent in this archetypal spiritual treasure.
San Juan very effectively presents the psychological brutality of the Dark
Night, but notably he also gives the reader the assurance that final salvation
from the Dark Night, and final salvation after life, can both be finally
obtained. These two natural human desires, wanting to escape death and
meaninglessness, are closely related psychologically.
The archetypal Night is a common experience for the mystic of any authentic
tradition; it results after attaining freedom from the conventional and
restrictive ways which human beings normally employ to give meaning to
their lives and cope with fear of death. Radically freed from the limitations of
these mental devices, the mystic’s cognitive and emotional defenses crumble,
and she obtains a raw experience of the death fear and the consequent fear of
authority of someone who has been in this very same emotionally distraught
condition, assures me that if I maintain fortitude, the night will pass and I will
be finally delivered.”
The potential problem for the hope-retaining mystic is that she might
indefinitely fail to achieve her aim; she might indeed not experience ecstatic
deliverance during her life, or for that matter ever. She may get stuck
endlessly
It seems that one cannot fully climb out with a sense of spiritual wholeness
until one holds nothing back, and is purged of the idea that one can be certain
of finally getting out.
If one simply waits hopefully during the dark suffering, hopeful that one will
get out some day, that one will ultimately be saved, this continual not yet
fulfilled hope may endure to the extent that one ends up spending one’s entire
life in misery. The misery results from not fully believing, on a subconscious
level, that one will be saved, but yet consciously attempting to assure oneself
that one will.
In this case we could say that one is punished (punished by oneself) for not
allowing oneself to consciously have honest doubts.
Problem number two:
Strangely enough, even with this gloomy possibility kept in mind, despite the
quite reasonable assessment of hopelessness, one is able to discover that one
can, profitably surrender to an encounter with something one discovers in the
ground of our being. This discovery is love. In Book Two, Chapter 24,
section 3 of “Dark Night of the Soul,” San Juan tells us the when the desires
and natural faculties (domésticos de potencias) have been put to sleep
(poniéndolos en sueño) the soul experiences an ecstatic possession by love
(posesión de amor). I submit that the natural existential desire to live forever
is one of the most important desires to put to sleep.
One might call this archetypal phenomenon the love dynamic. A person can
decide to surrender to this love without needing to count on any kind of
future benefit for so doing; one can surrender to it and experience the
profound immediate joy of it, joy for no provably rational reason. In this case
one is surrendering to unconditional love, not out of hope, but purely for the
intense pleasure derived from the immediacy of the experience. It is hard to
surrender everything which I had willed my future to be, most importantly
my own
1. San Juan de la Cruz, The Dark Night (La Noche Oscura) Book Two,
chapter 23, section 10: “…; Because these spiritual visions more often are
those of the other life than this one, when they are seen they prepare one for
the one to come (the life hereafter) (“…; porque estas visiones espirituales
más son de la otra vida que de ésta, y, cuando se ve una, dispone para otra.)