Dataset Paper
Dataset Paper
Cite this article: Miramirkhani F, Uysal M. Ozyegin University, 34794 Istanbul, Turkey
2020 Channel modelling for indoor visible light FM, 0000-0002-6691-9779; MU, 0000-0001-5945-0813
communications. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 378:
20190187. Visible light communication (VLC) allows the dual
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2019.0187 use of light-emitting diodes (LEDs) for wireless
communication purposes in addition to their
primary purpose of illumination. As in any other
Accepted: 10 January 2020 communication system, realistic channel modelling
is a key for VLC system design, analysis and testing.
One contribution of 17 to a theme issue In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey
of indoor VLC channel models. In order to set the
‘Optical wireless communication’.
background, we start with an overview of infrared
(IR) channel modelling, which has received much
Subject Areas:
attention in the past, and highlight the differences
electrical engineering between visible and IR optical bands. In the light
of these, we present a comparative discussion of
Keywords: existing VLC channel modelling studies and point
visible light communications, channel out the relevant advantages and disadvantages.
modelling, optical communication, Then, we provide a detailed description of a site-
communication systems specific channel modelling approach based on
non-sequential ray tracing that precisely captures the
optical propagation characteristics of a given indoor
Author for correspondence: environment. We further present channel models
Murat Uysal for representative deployment scenarios developed
e-mail: [email protected] through this approach that were adopted by the
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering
(IEEE) as reference channel models. Finally, we
consider mobile VLC scenarios and investigate the
effect of receiver location and rotation for a mobile
indoor user.
This article is part of the theme issue ‘Optical
wireless communication’.
1. Introduction
It is estimated that around 70–80% of mobile data
traffic takes place in an indoor environment [1]. This
requires the development of low-cost, energy-efficient
2020 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
and high-speed indoor wireless access solutions. To release the pressure on the highly
2
congested radiofrequency (RF) spectrum, visible light communication (VLC) has emerged as a
complementary and/or alternative wireless access technology [2–4]. VLC is based on the principle
N
h(k) (t; S, R) ≈ h(0) (t; S, εi ) ⊗ h(k−1) (t; εi , R)
i=1
n + 1 ρi cosn (φ) cos(θ )
N
2θ (k−1) t − di
= rect h ; {r, n̂, 1}, R A, (2.1)
2π d2 π v
i=1
where k is the order of reflection; i is the ith reflecting element; ρ i is the reflectivity of the
ith reflecting element; A is the area of reflecting element; N is the total number of reflecting
elements; φ is the irradiance angle; θ is the incident angle; d is the distance between source and
receiver and v is the speed of light. In (2.1), ⊗ denotes convolution and rect (.) is defined by
1 |x| ≤ 1
rect(x) = . (2.2)
0 |x| > 1
Owing to the contribution of multiple reflections, this approach models multipath dispersion
with reasonable accuracy [35–39]. However, for reflections of order higher than three, this model
proves to be prohibitively expensive in terms of computer memory requirements and total
4
S
n n̂s
io f
ct ei
fle
t re
1s LOS n
io
ect
efl
dr
2n
d
n̂R
q
FOV
R
AR
computation time. To address this issue, several variants of recursive methods were further
proposed [37–39]. For example, the DUSTIN algorithm [37] reduces the computational complexity
as well as memory requirements by slicing the recursive operations into time steps rather than
into a number of reflections. Another alternative is an iterative-based algorithm [39] where
CIR calculation follows the basic methodology outlined in [36] with extensions for an arbitrary
number of objects inside the environment. It was reported in [39] that the iterative method is more
than 90 times faster compared with the recursive method when three reflections are considered.
Another widely used approach is geometric-based modelling, where a closed-form expression
for the CIR is constructed by assuming specific transmitter, receiver and reflector geometries. For
example, in the so-called ceiling bounce model [40], the transmitter and receiver are co-located
in panels parallel to the floor towards the ceiling (figure 2). A closed-form CIR is presented
by considering geometric parameters of the room as well as the reflectance values. This model
translates the effect of multiple reflections into loss of optical power at the receiver (i.e. path
loss) and the delay spread of the signal arriving at the receiver after multiple reflections. In
[41], an empty room is considered where the transmitter was placed at the centre of the ceiling
and the receiver was placed at a height of 1 m. The indoor CIR is defined as a combination
of diffuse components and a direct LOS component. It is shown that at lower frequencies,
the diffuse component of the impulse response can be approximated by first-order low-pass
frequency response of Ulbricht’s integrating sphere. In [42], an empty room is considered where
the transmitter and receiver were placed on the floor upward to the ceiling with inter-distance
of up to 10 m. As the distance between the source and the receiver increases, the primary
reflection impulse responses changes from a sharp shape to a smooth convex shape. As a good
match based on curve fitting, the Gamma probability density function is selected in [42] to
model the primary reflection impulse response while a spherical model is used to calculate the
impulse response associated with higher order reflections. It was further demonstrated that the
bandwidth characteristics are dominated by the response of the primary reflection rather than the
higher-order reflections.
As an alternative to deterministic methods, MCRT can be employed [43–46]. This approach
relies on repeated random sampling to obtain numerical results. In contrast with deterministic
methods discussed so far, the Monte Carlo approach allows for the evaluation of the impulse
response for environments with complex geometries, especially when a large number of
5
z
x
y
reflections are considered. This method involves discretization of room surfaces (i.e. walls,
floors, ceiling) into reflecting elements, ray generation based on a given statistical distribution
(distribution type depends on the source) and then tracking of each ray until it reaches detector to
calculate the detected power and associated delay. In conventional ray tracing algorithms, there
is no limitation on the number of reflections that can be considered. However, the probability
that the rays will reach the receiver is not high, and so a very large number of rays (i.e. in the
order of millions) needs to be traced. To address this issue, accelerated ray tracing algorithms
were introduced. For example, in [44], each reflection of the rays is used to calculate an LOS
contribution to the receiver from the reflecting point, thus using each ray multiple times instead
of only once. This leads to a lower number of generated rays from the source to calculate an
impulse response.
40 40
20 20
0 0
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 700 800 900 1000 1100
wavelength (nm) wavelength (nm)
Figure 3. (a) Relative spectral power distribution of white LED (Cree Xlamp MC-E) and (b) IR LED (OSRAM SFH 4283 880 nm).
spectral reflectance
100
VL band IR band
90
80
70
60
reflectance (%)
50
40
aluminium
black gloss paint
30 pine wood
plate window glass
20 plaster
10
0
400 450 500 550 600 650 700 750 800 850 900 950
wavelength (nm)
Figure 4. Spectral reflectance of various materials in VL and IR bands. (Online version in colour.)
contrast with time-domain methods, a frequency-domain method was adopted in [51] and the
channel transfer functions of diffuse components and LOS component were obtained. Then, a
recursive linear time-invariant system was constructed based on the transfer functions.
Geometric-based models were also proposed for VLC channels. Particularly, in [52], a non-
line-of-sight (NLOS) analytical channel model for a cuboid room was proposed. In [53], a field of
view (FOV) geometry-based single bounce (GBSB) model for VLC channels was developed. Fixed
reflectance values with purely diffuse reflections and ideal Lambertian source were assumed in
[52,53]. In [54], a regular-shaped geometry-based multiple bounce (RS-GBMB) model for VLC
channels was proposed. The proposed model employs a combined two-ring model and ellipse
model (see fig. 3 of [54]), where the received signal is constructed as a sum of the LOS, single-,
double- and triple bounced rays of different powers.
As an alternative to deterministic methods, MCRT was further adopted in an effort to more
7
accurately capture the VLC channel characteristics. In [55], the wavelength dependency was
explicitly taken into account in addition to the effect of mixed diffuse and specular reflections
method modelling of reflectance number of reflections other assumptions observations and comments
[47] recursive fixed reflectance third order — purely Lambertian reflections This study builds upon the recursive method proposed
— empty room originally in [36] for IR channels. Spatial distributions of
— ideal Lambertian source illuminance and RMS delay spread are presented for an
empty room with a size of 5 m × 5 m × 3 m. Based on
RMS values, it is concluded that the maximum bit rate that
can be transmitted through the channel (without needing
an equalizer) will be limited to 28 Mb s−1 for the simulation
scenario under consideration. It should be noted that this
study builds upon the simplifying assumptions of
Lambertian source and purely diffuse reflections. More
importantly, a fixed reflectance value is assumed ignoring
the wavelength dependency in VL wavelengths.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[48] recursive (iterative site-based) averaged reflectance fourth order — purely Lambertian reflections This study builds upon the iterative recursive method proposed
— room with objects originally in [39] for IR channels. In an effort to decrease
— ideal Lambertian source computation time, the first-order reflections are first
obtained in this method, and then used to determine the
higher-order reflections in an iterative manner. Simulations
are carried out for two rooms with sizes of
5 m × 5 m × 3 m and 10 m × 10 m × 4 m. CIRs and
frequency responses are presented for sample locations
along with RMS delay spread. In addition, the so-called
signal-to-ISI ratio is presented to determine the need for an
equalizer. It should be noted that this study, similar to [47],
builds on simplifying assumptions such as Lambertian
source and purely diffuse reflections. In an effort to reflect
the effect of wavelength dependency in channel modelling,
the reflectance values are calculated as the average of
wavelength-dependent coefficients over the VL band.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(Continued.)
...............................................................
8
method modelling of reflectance number of reflections other assumptions observations and comments
[49] recursive wavelength dependent third order — purely Lambertian reflections This study is based on the recursive algorithm of [36], but
— empty room further takes into account the main differences between IR
— ideal Lambertian source and VL channels. This is the first paper to account for the
wavelength-dependent nature of reflectors in VLC channel
modelling. Simulations are carried out for a room with size
of 5 m × 5 m × 3 m and CIR is presented for plaster and
plastic walls with notably different reflectance values.
Comparisons are also made between IR and VLC channels
and it is discussed that the total received power from
reflected paths and the RMS delay spread of the VLC cases
are smaller than those of the IR cases. It should be noted
that, similar to [47,48], the work in [49] is also limited to
the assumptions of only purely diffuse reflections and ideal
Lambertian source which might not hold true for many
practical cases.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[50] recursive fixed reflectance third order — purely Lambertian reflections This study builds upon the recursive method of [36].
— empty room Simulations are carried out for a room with size of
— non-ideal Lambertian source 5 m × 5 m × 3 m. The effects of two distinct
non-Lambertian source radiation patterns on impulse and
frequency responses, RMS delay spread, and path loss are
quantified in comparison to ideal Lambertian radiation
pattern. It should be noted that, similar to [47–49], the
work in [50] is limited to the assumption of only purely
diffuse reflections which cannot appropriately model the
surfaces of most furniture. A fixed reflectance value is
assumed ignoring the wavelength dependency in VL
wavelengths.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(Continued.)
...............................................................
9
method modelling of reflectance number of reflections other assumptions observations and comments
[51] frequency-domain method fixed reflectance high order (>10) — purely Lambertian reflections This study develops a frequency-domain matrix formalism to
— empty room describe the indoor channel for a room with Lambertian
— ideal Lambertian source reflectors. Unlike time-domain approaches, this approach
allows to take into account higher order reflections.
Simulations are carried out for a room with size of
5 m × 5 m × 3 m and CIRs and frequency responses are
presented for sample locations along with RMS delay
spread. While high order reflections are considered for a
realistic channel modelling in this study, there are some
simplifying assumptions such as Lambertian source, purely
diffuse reflections and fixed reflectance value.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[52] geometric based fixed reflectance first order — purely Lambertian reflections This study proposes an analytical method with a relatively low
— empty room computational complexity for calculating the non-LOS CIR.
— ideal Lambertian source Simulations are carried out for a room with size of
5 m × 5 m × 3 m. The CIR obtained through this method
is compared with that generated via ray tracing
simulations. It is shown that the proposed method offers
high accuracy for the first-order multipath components. It
should be noted that this study builds on simplifying
assumptions such as purely diffuse reflections, fixed
reflectance value and ideal radiation pattern.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[53] geometric based (FOV-GBSB) averaged reflectance first order — purely Lambertian reflections This study proposes a geometric-based method to simulate the
— room with virtual scatterers VLC channels. Simulations are carried out for a room with
— ideal Lambertian source size of 5 m × 5 m × 3 m and CIRs are presented along with
angle of arrival (AoA) and channel gains. Similar to [48], this
work uses an averaged reflectance value. It further assumes
ideal Lambertian source and purely diffuse reflections.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(Continued.)
...............................................................
10
method modelling of reflectance number of reflections other assumptions observations and comments
[54] geometric based (RS-GBMB) fixed reflectance third order — purely Lambertian reflections This study proposes a geometry-based multiple bounce model
— room with virtual scatterers for VLC channels. Simulations are carried out for room with
— ideal Lambertian source size of 5 m × 5 m × 3 m and CIRs are presented for
different number of reflections up to 3. It is shown that the
LOS component carries a significant amount of power
compared with the primary reflections (up to 3). This study
builds on simplifying assumptions such as Lambertian
source and purely diffuse reflections.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[55] Monte Carlo ray tracing wavelength dependent high order (=10) — diffuse, specular and mixed This study builds upon the Monte Carlo ray tracing method
reflections proposed originally in [43] for IR channels. Simulations are
— room with objects carried out for a hexagonal room and CIR is presented for
— ideal Lambertian source sample locations. It is shown that the computational
efficiency can be improved by two optimization methods.
The first one consists of dividing the geometry of the
environment into cubic regions of equal size and the second
one involves the parallelization of the simulation. Owing to
low complexity implementation, higher order reflections
are handled in this study for a more realistic channel
modelling. Different types of reflections are also taken into
account for precise characterization of surfaces. However,
the ideal Lambertian model is still considered which might
not be justified for most practical light sources.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
(Continued.)
...............................................................
11
method modelling of reflectance number of reflections other assumptions observations and comments
[56] modified Monte Carlo ray tracing fixed reflectance third order — diffuse, specular and mixed This study is an extension of the Monte Carlo ray tracing
reflections method of [43]. Each reflection of the rays is used to
— empty room calculate an LOS contribution from the reflecting point to
— ideal Lambertian source the receiver, thus using each ray multiple times instead of
only once. This leads to a lower number of generated rays
from the source to calculate an impulse response. Hence,
this method is found to be faster compared to conventional
ray tracing method. In addition, to address the effect of
reflection models in ray tracing, the study investigates
different BRDF models. Simulations are carried out for a
room with size of 7.5 m × 5.5 m × 3.5 m and channel
bandwidth is presented for different reflection models. The
work however builds upon the simplifying assumptions of
Lambertian source and a fixed reflectance value is assumed
ignoring the wavelength dependency in VL wavelengths.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[57] photon tracing fixed reflectance high order (>10) — diffuse, specular and mixed This study proposes a photon modelling method with a
reflections computation time that increases linearly with the number
— room with objects of reflections. This allows the consideration of higher order
— non-ideal Lambertian source reflections. CIR is presented for a room with size of
5 m × 5 m × 3 m including furniture. A non-ideal
Lambertian source is considered along with diffuse,
specular and mixed reflections. However, similar to most of
the above works, a fixed reflectance value is assumed
ignoring the wavelength dependency in VL wavelengths.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................
12
detector
specification
we create a three-dimensional (3D) simulation environment where we can specify the geometry of
the indoor environment, the objects within, the reflection characteristics of the surface materials,
and the specifications of the light sources and detectors. In the second step, we use non-sequential
ray tracing to calculate the detected power and path lengths from source to detector for each ray.
In the third step, we import these data to Matlab and obtain the CIRs for the environment under
consideration. Further details for each step are elaborated in the following.
where Pj is the optical power of the jth ray, τ j is the propagation time of the jth ray, δ(t) is the
Dirac delta function and Nr is the number of rays received at the detector.
Once we obtain CIRs, we can calculate fundamental channel parameters such as DC gain and
delay spread. Channel DC gain is calculated as
∞
H0 = h(t)dt. (3.2)
0
The time dispersion parameters of channel, RMS delay spread and mean excess delay are,
respectively, given by [58]
∞
∞
τRMS = (t − τ0 )2 h(t) dt h(t) dt . (3.4)
0 0
and ∞ ∞
τ0 = th(t)dt h(t)dt . (3.5)
0 0
(a) 10 × 10 LED chips 15
3m
5m
5m
(b) 90
1.0
120 0.9 60
0.8
0.7
0.6
150 0.5 30
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
180 0
–151 –30
–120 –60
–90
Figure 7. (a) Three-dimensional environment and (b) emission pattern of source. (Online version in colour.)
3.5
2.5
power (W)
2.0
1.5
1.0
0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50
time (ns)
number of lighting 4
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
FOV of PD 85°
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
area of PD 1 (cm2 )
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
In figure 9, we investigate the effect of first-order reflections. Figure 9a presents the first-order
reflection terms, while figure 9b is the aggregated CIR where both LOS and first-order reflections
are considered simultaneously. It is observed that first-order reflections contribute some non-
negligible increase in both amplitude and delay spread. Mathematically speaking, the channel
DC gain increases from 4.82 × 10−5 to 6.03 × 10−5 and RMS delay spread increases from 2.10
to 3.33 ns.
In figure 10, we investigate the effect of second-order reflections. It is observed that second-
order reflections make a very slight increase in the amplitudes but effectively increases the delay
spread of CIR. Specifically, the channel DC gain increases from 6.03 × 10−5 to 7.06 × 10−5 , while
RMS delay spread increases from 3.33 to 6.60 ns.
In figure 11, we present the CIR where we assume k = 3 reflections. As a benchmark, we
include the CIR of [49] obtained through the recursive method. Since the results in [49] are
also obtained for k = 3 reflections, this gives an opportunity to make a one-to-one comparison.
It is observed from figure 11 that two CIRs are almost identical confirming the accuracy of our
(a) ×10–5 (b) ×10–5 17
4.0 4.0
3.5 3.5
2.5 2.5
2.0 2 2.0
1.5 1 1.5
1.0 1.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.5 0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
time (ns) time (ns)
Figure 9. (a) CIR for first-order reflections and (b) CIR for k = 1 (i.e. LOS and first-order reflections). (Online version in colour.)
3.5 3.5
3.0 3.0
×10–6
3
2.5 2.5
power (W)
2
2.0 2.0
1.5 1 1.5
1.0 1.0
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.5 0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
time (ns) time (ns)
Figure 10. (a) CIR for second-order reflections and (b) CIR for k = 2 (i.e. LOS, first- and second-order reflections). (Online version
in colour.)
approach. Some small differences between the tails of two CIRs are observed. This is due to the
fact that our light source is a commercial light source and does not behave exactly as a Lambertian
source ( figure 7b) unlike the ideal source assumed in [49].
In an effort to have a better understanding of the impact of higher order reflections, figure 12
presents the channel DC gain and RMS delay spread with respect to reflection numbers. It is
observed that there is no notable change for values larger than k = 4 in an empty room under
consideration.
In figure 13, we investigate the effect of reflection types. Most existing works [47–54] build
upon the assumption of purely diffuse reflections. In contrast, our approach can handle other
type of reflections. In the following, we assume mixed reflections ( figure 13a) and mostly specular
reflections ( figure 13b) where SF is set to 0.5 and 0.2, respectively. It is observed from figure 13a,b
that the presence of specular components creates fluctuations in CIR and results in deviations
from the purely diffuse case. This is particularly evident in figure 13b where mostly specular case
is considered. In diffuse case, when one ray reflects from the surface, the power of ray decays
by reflection coefficient and that power is divided among scattering rays. On the other hand, in
specular case, the power of ray just decays by reflection coefficient and there is no division of
power among scattering rays. By considering specular components for materials, the power of
rays decays slowly which results in fluctuations of CIR.
×10–5 18
4 recursive method [49]
...............................................................
3
power (W)
2
0 10 20 30 40 50
time (ns)
Figure 11. CIR for k = 3 and comparison with recursive method in [49] for the same number of reflections. (Online version in
colour.)
9
9
8
7
8
6
tRMS (ns)
H0 7 5
4
6
3
2
5
1
4
0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8
k k
Figure 12. (a) Channel DC gain and (b) RMS delay spread versus number of reflections assuming diffuse reflections. (Online
version in colour.)
Finally, figure 14 presents the DC gain and RMS delay spread with respect to the number of
reflections for mixed and mostly specular reflection cases. It is observed from figure 14 that, in the
mixed case, the value of channel DC gain saturates after three reflections while the saturation of
RMS delay spread occurs after four reflections. In the mostly specular case, there is no significant
change in channel DC gain after eight reflections while RMS delay spread becomes constant after
nine reflections.
2.5 2.5
2.0 2.0
1.5 1.5
1.0 1.0
0.5 0.5
0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50
time (ns) time (ns)
Figure 13. Comparison of CIRs (a) purely diffuse versus mixed and (b) purely diffuse versus mostly specular. (Online version in
colour.)
H0 7 5
4
6
3
2
5
mixed reflections 1 mixed reflections
mostly specular reflections mostly specular reflections
4
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
k k
Figure 14. (a) Channel DC gain and (b) RMS delay spread versus number of reflections assuming mixed reflections and mostly
specular reflections. (Online version in colour.)
development of both optical camera communication (OCC) and high-speed VLC where
smartphone cameras and photodetectors are, respectively, used as receivers. In March 2017, a
spin-off group dedicated on high-speed VLC was established and named as IEEE 802.15.13.
In standardization works, to make a fair performance comparison between various system
proposals, a critical issue is to establish reference channel models. Based on the methodology
described in §3, CIRs were obtained for typical indoor environments including home, office and
manufacturing cell and these were endorsed by the IEEE as VLC reference channel models [69,70].
The four scenarios under consideration include workplace (open office floor and cubicles), office
room with secondary light, living room and manufacturing cell. In the following, we describe
each of these scenarios, present associated CIRs and discuss the relevant channel parameters.
(c) office room with secondary light (d) enlarged version of (c) showingsecondary light,
i.e. desklight
D6
D8 D8 D5
D3 D2
D4
D1
D5
D7 D1
D6 D2
D4 D3
The first one has an open office layout (figure 15a) while the second one (figure 15b) has cubicles.
Thirty-two luminaires are uniformly located in a rectangular grid at the ceiling. The luminaires
used in simulations are commercially available (Cree LR24-38SKA35). They have a non-ideal
Lambertian pattern, a semi-angle of half power of 40° and luminous efficacy (i.e. the ratio of
luminous flux to optical power) of 73 lumens per watt. The illumination levels are provided
in figure 16a. It can be readily checked that the minimum, maximum and average values of
illumination are 278 lx, 712 lx and 533 lx, respectively. It can be noted that the average value
satisfies the required typical illumination level of 500 lx for workplaces [71].
In the second scenario, an office room with a size of 5 m × 5 m × 3 m is considered (figure 15c). It
is assumed that there are two light sources. One of them is the main ceiling light, while the other
(a) 750 (b) 1000
21
700 900
800 650 1000
...............................................................
700 600 800
600 700 700
550 600
500 500 600
500 400
400
300 500
300 450
200
200 400 100 400
20 20
350 300
ce 15 20 ce 15 20
lls lls
in 10 15 300 in 10 15 200
Yd 10 Yd 10
ire 5
re ction ire 5
rection
cti
on 0
5
in X di 250 cti
on 0
5
in X di 100
0 cells 0 cells
170
(c) 165
170
illumination levels (Lx)
165 160
160
155 155
150
150
145
140 145
20
ce 15 20 140
lls
in 10 15
Yd 10
ire 5 ction
cti 5 dire 135
on 0 in X
0 cells
Figure 16. Illumination levels for (a) workplace, (b) office room with secondary light and (c) living room. (Online version in
colour.)
90
1.0
120 0.9 60
0.8
0.7
0.6
150 0.5 30
0.4
0.3
0.2
0.1
180 0
–151 –30
–120 –60
–90
Figure 17. Emission pattern of cubic transmitter with six LEDs in manufacturing cell scenario assuming scanning angles of 45°
and 90°, respectively, indicated by green and red colour. (Online version in colour.)
one is a desk light. Such a scenario is particularly useful to evaluate the performance of relay-
22
assisted (cooperative) VLC systems [25] where the ceiling light acts as the source and the desk
light serves as the relay ( figure 15d). The destination receiver is on the desk next to the laptop.
τ RMS (ns) H0
R→D 1.37 1.30 × 10−4
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
As a final remark, we need to point to out that IR sources are typically used in the uplink, e.g.
current product offerings from different companies [72,73]. In an effort to give an idea about the
uplink channels, we further provide CIRs for the uplink assuming IR light sources in the second
scenario. We assume that each USB hub of source terminal (in the form of laptop) is equipped with
four IR LEDs (figure 18b). The separation between adjacent IR LEDs is taken as 5 cm. The distance
between adjacent USB hubs is 12.5 cm. The IR LED has a full angle of half power of 120°. We equip
Table 5. Channel parameters for living room.
24
τ RMS (ns) H0
τ RMS (ns) H0
D1 13.48 1.16 × 10−6
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
each of 16 luminaires on the ceiling with one PD ( figure 18a). The FOV and area of PD are 85° and
1 cm2 , respectively. The corresponding CIRs are provided in [74]. Table 7 summarizes the main
channel characteristics. It is observed that DC gains and RMS delay spreads of VL channels are
smaller than those in IR channels. This is mainly due to the reason that reflectivity values in the
IR band are larger than those in the VL band.
...............................................................
PD5 PD6 PD7 PD8
(b)
Figure 18. (a) Arrangement of PDs on the ceiling and (b) top view of the desk with laptop and IR LEDs. (Online version
in colour.)
mobile receiver terminal in the form of a cell phone. Seven possible locations are considered for
the photodetector. Five of these are on the top edge and two of them are on the top round corners
of the device. For each possible location of a photodetector, we obtain CIRs and corresponding
Table 7. Channel parameters of uplink IR channels as seen by PD1.
26
τ RMS (ns) H0
path loss. To further demonstrate the effects of user location, we present the spatial distribution
of channel gain within the room.
We consider a room with a size of 6 m × 6 m × 3 m as illustrated in figure 19 with plaster
ceiling/walls and a pinewood floor. We assume nine luminaires on the ceiling with equidistance
spacing. These are commercially available LEDs (Cree CR6-800 L) with 40° semi-angle of half
power. The optical power for each luminaire is 11 W. This yields an average illumination level of
153 lx which satisfies typical illumination levels for home environment [71].
We consider a user with a height of 1.8 m and model the human body as a CAD object
(https://grabcad.com/library/28376) (figure 20a) with absorbing property [77]. The cell phone
has a size of 5.5 cm × 10.5 cm × 0.5 cm and is equipped with a single photodetector. The user holds
the phone in his hand next to his ear with 45° rotation upward and at a height of 1.65 m. We
consider seven possible locations for the photodetectors denoted as Dn , n = 1, . . . , 7 ( figure 20b).
D1, . . . , D5 are placed on the top edge of the cell phone, while D6 and D7 are placed on the top
two round corners of the cell phone. The FOV and the area of each detector are 85° and 1 cm2 ,
respectively.
To further investigate the effects of user locations, we consider 100 cells with equidistant
spacing of 0.6 m in x and y directions. The user is assumed to be standing in the middle of the
cell where his/her body is perpendicular to the floor and he/she always stands parallel to y
direction. As case study, we consider 10 example locations for the user denoted as P1,3 , P2,8 ,
P3,1 , P4,4 , P5,9 , P6,5 , P7,2 , P8,7 , P9,10 and P10,6 (i.e. indicated with yellow squares in figure 19).
For the sake of simplicity and without loss of generality, the effective channel responses as seen
by photodetector D5 are illustrated in figure 21 assuming cut-off frequency of f cut−off = 20 MHz
[79]. It is observed that the low-pass characteristics of LED result in some attenuation towards
higher frequencies. It is also observed that in the effective channel responses of P1,3 , P10,6 and P9,10
frequency selectivity is more pronounced. It is a result of the fact that these locations are close to
the walls ( figure 19) and, therefore, more reflected rays are received. It might be also interesting
to observe somehow different channel characteristics observed for P1,3 and P3,1 , although these
locations are symmetrical in space. This is mainly due to the position of the user who stands
Table 8. Comparison table of works on indoor mobile VLC channel modelling.
method modelling of reflectance number of reflections other assumptions observations and comments
[75,76] recursive fixed reflectance first order — purely Lambertian These studies ([76] is a journal version of [75]) build upon the recursive method of [36].
— empty room Simulations are carried out for room with size of 5 m × 5 m × 3 m assuming the mean
— mock-up human body density of pedestrians in the range of 0.01–0.1 m−2 with uniformly distributed velocity
(i.e. cylindrical object) (0–4 km h−1 ), uniformly distributed orientation (0–2π rad) and walking time 5 s. As
— multiple luminaires performance metrics, outage area per service area versus data rate, outage call duration
— ideal Lambertian source rate versus mean density of pedestrians and blocking rate versus height of human body are
presented. It is discussed that the selection of the optimal number of the LED lighting can
mitigate the shadowing. This study builds on a number of simplifying assumptions such as
Lambertian source, purely diffuse reflections and ignores the wavelength dependency of
reflectance value in VL wavelengths.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[77] Monte Carlo ray wavelength dependent high order (>4) — purely Lambertian This study builds upon the Monte Carlo ray tracing method of [43]. Simulations are carried out
tracing — empty room for a room with size of 8 m × 10 m × 2.5 m assuming two different people with height of
— mock-up human body 150 and 180 cm. They move between transmitter and receiver with a step distance of 40 cm.
(i.e. cuboid object) Path loss and RMS delay spread are presented. It is shown that human shadowing has an
— single luminaire adverse effect on the VLC system under LOS scenario, and by changing the relative angle, it
— ideal Lambertian source is possible to mitigate the human shadowing effect. As for the NLOS scenario, the further
away the receiver is from the LED, the more sensitive to human shadowing the VLC system
will be. It should be noted that this study builds on some simplifying assumptions similar to
[75,76]. In addition, a simplified cylindrical object is used to model the human body which
cannot accurately capture the effect of the user body.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
[78] recursive fixed reflectance first order — purely Lambertian This study builds upon the recursive method of [36]. Simulations are carried out for three room
— room with furniture types, i.e. corridor, office and hall, with sizes of 20 m × 20 m × 3 m, 6 m × 7 m × 3 m
— multiple luminaires and 12 m × 8 m × 3 m, respectively. The people are randomly distributed within the room
— ideal Lambertian source where the number of people is chosen to follow approximately the same people density for
different room types, i.e. 0.16 people m−2 and 0.17 people m−2 . The position of each
person is chosen to be different and people are randomly moved for 30 s. The CDF of
received power and RMS delay spread are presented along with the spatial distribution of
received power. It is shown that the PDF of the normalized received power has a match to
Rayleigh distribution. Similar to [75–77], this study builds on some simplifying
assumptions on reflection type and source pattern.
.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
...............................................................
27
P4,4
P6,5
6m
4 5 6
P10,6
P8,7
P2,8
7 8 9
P5,9
P9,10
Figure 19. Room under consideration with green circles denoting luminaires and yellow squares denoting the example
locations of the user. (Online version in colour.)
(a)
(b)
D1 D6
D2
D3
D4
D5
45°
D7
Figure 20. (a) Human model and (b) location and rotation of PDs on the cell phone. (Online version in colour.)
–60
P3,1 29
–70 P7,2
P1,3
...............................................................
P4,4
P6,5
–90
P10,6
–130
–140
–150
–160
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
frequency (MHz)
Figure 21. Effective channel responses as seen by photodetector D5 for the sample locations of the user. (Online version in
colour.)
τ RMS (ns) H0
D1 13.92 0.60 × 10−5
..........................................................................................................................................................................................................
parallel to the y direction and holds the cell phone in his right hand. When the user stands in P3,1 ,
the received signal is mainly dominated by the LOS component from luminaire 1. On the other
hand, there is no LOS signal in P1,3 and the received signal mainly depends on reflected signals.
In figure 22, we illustrate the spatial distribution of channel gain as seen by the individual
photodetectors Dn , n = 1, . . . , 7. It is observed that as the user moves within the room, the spatial
distributions of channel gain seen by photodetectors D1, . . . , D6 follow the sinusoidal pattern in
x and y directions. When the user approaches to a luminaire, the signal strength increases. The
maximum signal strength (i.e. maximum value of channel gain) occurs when the user is right
under the luminaire. When the user walks away, the signal strength decreases. On the other hand,
the spatial distribution of channel gain seen by photodetector D7 is almost flat (i.e. the same
channel gain for all cells). This is a result of the fact that this detector is oriented towards the floor
and the detector only captures reflected rays, i.e. there is not LOS component.
Table 9 presents the average channel gains and RMS delay spreads (i.e. averaged over 100 cells
in the room) for D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, D6 and D7. It is observed from table 9 that the best location of
photodetector (i.e. minimum path loss) is D5. It can also be noted that D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6
have similar channel gain values in the range of 6 × 10−6 –7.19 × 10−6 . In comparison to them, D7
has about 2.95 × 10−6 –4.41 × 10−6 less channel gain on average since there is no LOS component.
In figure 23, we present the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of path loss as seen by
the individual photodetectors Dn , n = 1, . . . , 7. This defines the probability that path loss will
(a) ×10–5 (b) ×10–5 (c) D3 ×10–5
D1 D2
2.0 2.0
×10–5
2.0 30
×10–5 ×10–5
2.0 2.0 2.0
1.5
...............................................................
1.5 1.5 1.5
0 0 0
10 0.5 10 9 0.5 10 0.5
9 9
ce 8 7 ce 8 7 ce 8 7
lls 10 lls 10 lls 6 9 10
6
in 5 4 89 6
in 5 4 89 in 5 4 78
Y 67 Y 67 Y
di 3 2 5 6 ction
di 3 2 3 4 5 irection 0 di 3 2 3 4 5 irection 0 rec 1 2 34 d ir e 0
rec 1
tio 0
2
0 1 ells in X
d rec 1
tio 0
2
0 1 ells in X
d tio 0 0 1 ells in X
n c n c n c
0 0 0
10 0.5 10 0.5 10 0.5
9 9 9
ce 8 7 ce 8 7 10 ce 8 7
lls 6 9 10 lls 6 89 lls 6 9 10
in 5 4 78 in 5 4 67 in 5 4 78
Y 5 6 ction Y
di 3 2 4 5 irection Y
dir 3 2 5 6 ction
di 3 2 34 ir e 0 rec 1 2 3 d 0 2 34 d ire 0
rec 1 d ec 1 0
tio 0
2
0 1 ells in X tio 0 0 1 ells in X tio 0 1 ells in X
n c n c n c
(g) D7 ×10–5
2.0
×10–5
2.0
1.5
1.5
1.0
1.0
0.5
0
10 0.5
9
ce 8 7
lls 6 9 10
in 5 4 78
Y
di 3 2 5 6 ction
rec 1 2 34 dire 0
tio 0 0 1 ells in X
n c
Figure 22. Spatial distributions of path loss as seen by the individual photodetectors Dn, n = 1, . . . , 7. (Online version in
colour.)
1.0
cumulative density function (CDF)
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6 D1
0.5 D2
0.4 D3
D4
0.3
D5
0.2 D6
0.1 D7
0
60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45
path loss (dB)
Figure 23. CDF of path loss as seen by the individual photodetectors Dn, n = 1, . . . , 7. (Online version in colour.)
take less than or equal to a specific value. The figure further confirms the similar performance
31
behaviours of D1, D2, D3, D4, D5 and D6 locations.
...............................................................
pp. Th3I-4. Washington, DC: OSA.
2. Dimitrov S, Haas H. 2015 Principles of LED light communications: towards networked Li-Fi, 1st
edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Uysal M, Capsoni C, Ghassemlooy Z, Boucouvalas A, Udvary E. 2016 Optical wireless
communications: an emerging technology. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
4. Chi N. 2018 LED-based visible light Communications. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
5. Al-Kinani A, Wang CX, Zhou L, Zhang W. 2018 Optical wireless communication
channel measurements and models. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 20, 1939–1962. (doi:10.1109/
COMST.2018.2838096)
6. Luo J, Fan L, Li H. 2017 Indoor positioning systems based on visible light communication:
state of the art. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 19, 2871–2893. (doi:10.1109/COMST.2017.2743228)
7. Qiu Y, Chen HH, Meng WX. 2016 Channel modelling for visible light communications—a
survey. Wirel. Commun. Mob. Comput. 16, 2016–2034. (doi:10.1002/wcm.2665)
8. Karunatilaka D, Zafar F, Kalavally V, Parthiban R. 2015 LED based indoor visible light
communications: state of the art. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 17, 1649–1678. (doi:10.1109/
COMST.2015.2417576)
9. Pathak PH, Feng X, Hu P, Mohapatra P. 2015 Visible light communication, networking,
and sensing: a survey, potential and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tuts. 17, 2047–2077.
(doi:10.1109/COMST.2015.2476474)
10. Jovicic A, Li J, Richardson T. 2013 Visible light communication: opportunities, challenges and
the path to market. IEEE Commun. Mag. 51, 26–32. (doi:10.1109/MCOM.2013.6685754)
11. O’Brien DC. 2011 Visible light communications: challenges and potential. In Proc. IEEE
Photonics Conf. (PHO), 24th Annual Meeting, Arlington, VA, pp. 365–366. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
12. O’Brien DC, Zeng L, Le-Minh H, Faulkner G, Walewski JW, Randel S. 2008 Visible light
communications: Challenges and possibilities. In Proc. IEEE 19th Int. Symp. Personal Indoor
and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC), Cannes, France, pp. 1–5. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE.
13. Rajagopal S, Roberts RD, Lim S-K. 2012 IEEE 802.15.7 visible light communication:
modulation schemes and dimming support. IEEE Commun. Mag. 50, 72–82. (doi:10.1109/
MCOM.2012.6163585)
14. Park S, Jung D, Shin H, Shin D, Hyun Y, Lee K, Oh Y. 2007 Information broadcasting system
based on visible light signboard. In Proc. Wireless Optical Communication, Montreal, Canada, 30
May–1 June, pp. 311–313. Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
15. Komine T, Nakagawa M. 2004 Fundamental analysis for visible light communication system
using LED lights. IEEE Trans. Consum. Electron. 50, 100–107. (doi:10.1109/TCE.2004.1277847)
16. Bian R, Tavakkolnia I, Haas H. 2019 15.73 Gb/s visible light communication with off-the-shelf
LEDs. J. Lightw. Technol. 37, 2418–2424. (doi:10.1109/JLT.2019.2906464)
17. Mossaad MS, Hranilovic S, Lampe L. 2015 Visible light communications using OFDM and
multiple LEDs. IEEE Trans. Commun. 63, 4304–4313. (doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2015.2469285)
18. Dissanayake SD, Armstrong J. 2013 Comparison of ACO-OFDM, DCO-OFDM and ADO-
OFDM in IM/DD systems. J. Lightw. Technol. 31, 1063–1072. (doi:10.1109/JLT.2013.2241731)
19. Fernando N, Hong Y, Viterbo E. 2012 Flip-OFDM for unipolar communication systems. IEEE
Trans. Commun. 60, 3726–3733. (doi:10.1109/TCOMM.2012.082712.110812)
20. Narmanlioglu O, Kizilirmak RC, Baykas T, Uysal M. 2017 Link adaptation for MIMO
OFDM visible light communication systems. IEEE Access 5, 26 006–26 014. (doi:10.1109/
ACCESS.2017.2771333)
21. Hong Y, Wu T, Chen L-K. 2016 On the performance of adaptive MIMO-OFDM indoor
visible light communications. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 28, 907–910. (doi:10.1109/LPT.2016.25
17192)
22. Wu L, Zhang Z, Dang J, Liu H. 2015 Adaptive modulation schemes for visible light
communications. J. Lightw. Technol. 33, 117–125. (doi:10.1109/JLT.2014.2374171)
23. Na Z, Wang Y, Xiong M, Liu X, Xia J. 2018 Modelling and throughput analysis of an
ADO-OFDM based relay-assisted VLC system for 5G networks. IEEE Access 6, 17 586–17 594.
(doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2817487)
24. Feng L, Hu RQ, Wang J, Qian Y. 2018 Deployment issues and performance study in
33
a relay-assisted indoor visible light communication system. IEEE Syst. J. 13, 562–570.
(doi:10.1109/JSYST.2018.2869073)