Week 1
Week 1
Week 1
Modern or improved crop production technology has considerably raised output but has created
many problems. Major hazards of input intensive agricultural technology are:
The word “Sustain” from the Latin word sustenere sus-from below and tenere to hold, to keep in
existence or maintain, implies to long term support.
- It is a form of agriculture aimed at the meeting the food and fiber needs of the present
generation without endangering the resource base for the future generations.
- It describes the farming systems that are capable of maintaining their productivity and
usefulness to society indefinitely. Such systems must be resource conserving, socially
supportive, commercially competitive and environmentally sound.
- Sustainable agriculture encompasses management strategies that provide the society long
and short term means to conserve an adequate supply of quality food, enhance economic
viability, improve environmental quality and conserve the resource base.
- It is an integrated system of profitable crop production with minimal dependence upon
synthetic fertilizers; pesticides etc. and are more dependent upon natural resources.
- Sustainable agriculture is a balanced and efficient management system of renewable
resources (soil, crops plant genetic resources, wild life, forests, fish, livestock and
ecosystem) without degradation to provide adequate food, other needs for present and
future generations maintaining or improving productivity and ecosystem services
(detoxification of noxious chemicals with in soil, purification of waters, favourable
weather ) of these resources.
Sustainable agriculture is also referred to by other name such as organic farming /organic
agriculture. It is wrong conception. While it is true that organic agriculture may fall under the
umbrella of sustainability it does not follow that Sustainable agriculture is always organic.
Sustainable agriculture is not possible without chemical inputs. So it is considered by some as
integrated low input and highly productive farming system.
Organic agriculture differs from sustainable agriculture because organic agriculture does not
allow the use of inorganic fertilizers or additives in the soil nor antibiotics in animal production.
Crop fields must be certified chemical free for three years before a farmer can market crop as
organic. Non of these restrictions apply to sustainable agriculture. Sustainable agriculture is
generally regarding as an alternative to modern industrialized or conventional agriculture which
is highly specialized and capital intensive, heavily dependent upon synthetic chemicals and other
off-farm inputs.
SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE
Conservative
resource practices Attractive countrywide
High quality of
product
________________________________________________________________________
1. Sustainable farming is inherently unprofitable. If widely adopted would not feed the
world’s expanding population.
2. Conventional agriculture is basically sound. More careful and efficient farming will
ensure its sustainability e.g., farmers should use only the amount of fertilizers and
pesticides actually needed.
3. No agriculture is sustainable if it is not first and foremost a profitable agriculture.
Practices commonly recommended by proponents (those who propose) of sustainability
are inherently unprofitable.
4. Health, safety and environmental problems arise from the use of conventional farming
practices can be corrected by designing new and sensitive technologies.
5. Farming systems believed to be potentially the most sustainable will require the use of
much available land to produce inputs that are now manufactured and purchased off the
farm. This reasoning clearly support the argument for fine-tuning conventional
agriculture.
6. Conventional agriculture point out that highly specialized, capital-intensive, chemical
intensive methods have been widely adopted, not only because they increase production
but because they have been more profitable than practices now recommended by
proponents of sustainability. To condemn current and more profitable methods would be
to go back to hoes, hard lobour, lower yields and lower farm income.
1. It can be more profitable than the conventional agriculture especially when one will do
the calculation of profit, counts all of the benefits, and cost of farming. Further resource
conservation, protection of environment, farming in partnership with nature which are
requirements of sustainability will enhance, not reduce, global food production.
2. It prevents soil erosion, pesticide pollution and other adverse effects of conventional
farming from occurring.
3. As it is more careful and efficient farming, it must be encouraged.
4. Nature and naturally occurring process beneath and above the soil are allies contributing
not only to agronomic sustainability but to economic profitability, due to the synergism
of plants, animals, soil and farmer’s stewardship that are too easily forgotten in
conventional farming.
5. Proponents of sustainable agriculture cite evidence that sustainable yields can be equal if
not exceed and be less variable than those achieved using conventional methods. Higher
and more stable yields would also be expected to come with farmer experience, the
development of cultivars that contribute to sustainability and the availability of new
information and other services for farmers using sustainable practices.
The basic requirement of a farm such as seed, manures, water etc. should be procured
locally and reuse of these resources and its waste products should be increased and their
misuse should be stopped.
4. Preservation
The use of non-renewable resources (fertilizers) should be lessen. Resources which are
renewable to a limited extent should be saved in adequate quantity, such as underground
water, organic matter etc. the use of unlimited resources such as sunlight etc. should be
increased day by day.
In case of cultivation, different kind of crops should be grown for a similar food (e.g.,
paddy, wheat, potato for carbohydrates, gram, pea, lentil, soybean, cowpea etc. for
protein, rapeseed and mustard, sesamum, groundnut, sunflower etc. for oils) as well as
different varieties of same crop.
6. Self dependence
The new knowledge and technology should be such which increases the self-confidence
by making the local knowledge and technology more active. As a result of which local
right and control measures are increased over resources, technology and planning.
1. Input optimization
It is standard accounting practice to depreciate capital assets. It has not been standard
practice for farmers to depreciate natural capital that is depleted by farming methods
that do not conserve resources. Nevertheless, in sustainable agriculture, economic
value is created by maintaining the productivity of land and water resources, while
enhancing human health and the environments.
Conditions/Aims
- High population
- Low income
- Institutional constraints
- Socio-economic factors
- Poor land tenure system
- Scarcity of forests
- Climatic factors
- Land fragmentation (use of land for industrial + residential purpose, area suitable for
agriculture is less, low soil fertility, salinity, water logging and erosion)
- Dry lands
- Desertification (water logging and salinity deteriorated ground water, lowering of ground
water)
Benefits/Advantages
Economic benefits
Environmental benefits
• Improve farmland productivity and thus create opportunities to conserve wildlife habitats
from further conversion to agriculture
• Increasingly targeted pest management and precision farming strategies
• Protect and enhance ecosystem health particularly through biodiversity conservation, soil
and water quality management
Social benefits
• Consumer health and choice: A diverse range of high quality, affordable agricultural
product year around.
• Farmer choice: A variety of agricultural technologies appropriately adapted to local needs
and conditions.
• Public health: Managing pests that transmit human disease.
• Disadvantages: Low yield, lack of timely and effective control of pests. The conversion
process from modern agriculture to sustainable agriculture usually takes 3 to 6 years.
Organic farming systems do not use toxic agrochemical inputs (insecticides, herbicides,
fungicides and fertilizers). Instead they are bases on development of biological diversity for
- Substitution of manures, farm organic resources and biofertilizers for inorganic fertilizers
to maintain and replenish soil productivity.
- Insects, diseases and weeds management instead of chemical control.
Organic farming system approach is based on the perception that tomorrow‘s ecology is more
important than today‘s economy. Without ecology there is no economy. The economy must
readjust to the primary production factors and not the other way round. International Federation
Of Organic Agriculture Movement (IFDAM) expressed the objectives of organic farming as
follows:
i. To work, as much as possible, within a closed system with regard to organic matter and
nutrient elements,
ii. To maintain and increase long term fertility and productivity of soils,
iii. To stop degradation and re-establish natural balance,
iv. To avoid all form of pollutions that may result from agricultural techniques,
v. To minimize the use of fossil energy in agriculture,
vi. To work with natural system rather than seeking to dominate them,
vii. To use as far as possible, renewable sources in locally organized agricultural systems,
viii. To encourage and enhance the biological cycles with farming system involving
microorganisms, soil flora and fauna, plants and animals,
ix. To give all livestock, conditions of life that allow them to perform all aspects of their
innate (natural) behavior,
x. To maintain the genetic diversity of agricultural system and its surroundings, including
the protection of plants and wildlife habitats,
xi. To produce food of high nutritional quality in sufficient quantity,
xii. To allow agricultural producers an adequate return and satisfaction from their work
including a safe working environment,
xiii. To consider the wider social and ecological impact of the farming system,
Organic farming system is based on the dynamic interaction between the soil, plant, animal,
humans, ecosystem and the environment. The system is directed towards enhancing natural life
cycles rather than suppressing nature.
Basic principles
- Health
- Ecology
- Fairness
- Care
1. Conversion period
The time between the start of organic management and certification of crops is known as
conversion period.
The whole farm, including livestock should be converted according to the standards over
a period of time as per specifications. Diversity in crop production and animal husbandry
must be arranged in such a way that all the elements of farming interplay. The standards
requirement shall be met during the conversion period. Start of conversion period may be
calculated from the date of application. To ensure a clear separation between organic and
conventional production, the certification shall inspect the production system.
Once a field is eligible to produce a crop sold as organic, the farmer will need to manage the
borders of the fields if the neighboring field has had substances applied that are not allowed
under organic regulations. The National Organic Program (NOP) Section 205.202(c) states that
any field or farm parcel from which harvested crops are intended to be sold, labeled, or
represented as “organic,” must have distinct, defined boundaries and buffer zones such as runoff
diversions to prevent the unintended application of a prohibited substance to the crop or contact
with a prohibited substance applied to adjoining land that is not under organic management.
A buffer zone is defined as “an area located between a certified production operation or portion
of a production operation and an adjacent land area that is not maintained under organic
management. A buffer zone must be sufficient in size or other features (e.g., windbreaks or a
diversion ditch) to prevent the possibility of unintended contact by prohibited substances applied
to adjacent land areas with an area that is part of a certified operation.”
The federal rule does not specify that a buffer zone be a specific width, but it must be of
sufficient size to prevent drift or runoff of non-approved substances. The size of the buffer is
determined by the organic producer and approved by the certifying agent on a case-by-case
basis, depending on the risk of contamination by prohibited materials used on adjoining lands.
Typically, 25 to 30 feet is generally accepted by certifying agents as adequate to prevent most
contamination from a neighboring field.
Buffer zones can be planted to grass, permanent trees, and/or shrubs. These plantings can
provide habitat for birds, wildlife, and beneficial insects. Significant height in a buffer has the
added benefit of protecting fields and organic crops from contamination by aerial movement of
pesticides and from wind erosion. Buffer zones can be planted to a crop that is managed
organically but is sold as conventional. If a crop is taken from the buffer zone it will need to be
harvested separately from the organic crop and documented that it was harvested, stored and sold
as non-organic. If the buffer is mowed for hay, the farmer must keep a written record of the hay
harvest (name, date, location of buffer and crop harvested).
Buffer zones are only needed when there is an organic crop being grown and only needed during
the crop year when a prohibited product is being used by the neighbor. Certifying agents may
require the farmer to have a signed statement from the neighbor when they are not using
prohibited substances. Also, road crews, utilities, aerial spray companies, etc. can be notified not
to spray along an organic farmer’s field. If a no-spray agreement cannot be reached, then the
organic farmer can grow non-organic crops in the buffer zone, or leave it fallow.
While it is important to remember that organic standards are process-based, (rather than product-
based), the regulation does contain a maximum tolerance level for residues of prohibited
substances. If there is reason to suspect contamination, and tests reveal that a product contains
over 5 percent of the Environmental Protection Agency’s tolerance for a particular substance,
then the product can no longer be sold as “organic”.
References:
[2]. See the National Organic Program s205.2. Terms defined for buffer zones.
Midwest Organic & Sustainable Education Service. (2006). Transitioning to Organic Crop
Production (FS604). Spring Valley, WI: MOSES.
Riddle, Jim. (2005). Good Buffers Make Good Neighbors. Kutztown, PA: The Rodale Institute.
Permalink