Module 1 - Introduction To Risk Management 2023
Module 1 - Introduction To Risk Management 2023
Risk is a basic and ancient concept.. It has been there and shall remain..
What is risk??
Uncertainty about
Possibility of loss (a
future (can be
negative outcome)
positive too)
The concept of risk management evolved primarily after 2008 (Financial Crisis)
Certain industry specific standards emerged forming part of the risk management process.
Risk management therefore became a field of study based on the lesson learned from 2008.
Today, the process is implemented based on several international guidelines and principles.
But what exactly is risk management?
Risk Management explained
The definition refers to a complete process, involving several steps till risk is managed.
Remember, risk today refers simply to loss or profit- BOTH.
Example: a business can flourish or fail. The prices of property can increase or decrease
etc. etc.
What required the definition to change though?
Technology, globalization and finance to quote a few.
Internal factor and external factor contribute to a risk and can dramatically change the
scenario.
Today, international standards are applied to organisations for risk management.
Some international standards and their definitions of risk:
ISO 31000 and COSO (The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission is an organization) are the two leading risk management standards in the world
today.
The key and ultimate purpose of the risk management standard is to ensure the organization
is “…taking the right risks at the right level.
“We make money by taking risks, and we lose money, when we do not manage the
risks we are taking”
ISO 31000 and COSO explained
Similarities
Both standards expand the scope of risk management.
Both versions are meant to be guidelines
Both current versions are a dramatic improvement.
Both standards embed risk management in decision processes.
Differences
Structure- ISO is brief and 16 pages in total. COSO is a 100 page document.
Geography – ISO reaches around 70+ countries. COSO is US centric
Target audience – COSO focuses on people in accounting and audit. ISO31000 is broader
Focus - COSO focuses more on general corporate governance. ISO focuses on risk and
incorporating it in the strategic planning process
Risk Trends
Classifications of Risks
Pure Risks – the possibility of a loss only and no gain. A car accident for example.
Speculative Risks – the chance of a gain as well. Investment in stocks is an example.
(Market Risk, Inflation Risk, Interest Rate Risk and Liquidity risks)
Diversifiable and Non-Diversfiable Risks: Diversifiable effect only some individuals (risks in
one area or geography) whereas non-diversifiable affect larger segment (inflation,
earthquake etc.)
Subjective and Objective Risks – subjective is the perceived amount of risk, objective is
supported by facts.
Risk Quadrants – An organization may select to categorize risks as Hazard, Operational,
Financial and Strategic risks.
The Risk Quadrant
Hazard risks: arise from property, liability, or personnel loss exposures and are generally
the subject of insurance.
Operational risks: arise from people or a failure in processes, systems, or controls,
including those involving information technology.
Financial risks: arise from the effect of market forces on financial assets or liabilities
and include market risk, credit risk, liquidity risk and price risk.
Strategic risks: arise from trends in the economy and society, including changes in the
economic, political, and competitive environments, as well as from demographic shifts.
Whereas the classifications of risk focus on some aspect of the risk itself, the four
quadrants of risk focus on the risk source and who traditionally manages it. For example,
the chief financial officer traditionally manager financial risk, and the risk manager
traditionally manages hazard risk.
Just as a particular risk can fall into more than one classification, a risk can also fall into
multiple risk quadrants. For example, embezzlement of funds by an employee can be
considered both a hazard risk, because it is an insurable pure risk, and an operational
risk, because it involves a failure of controls.
According to ISO 31000, a risk appetite definition is “the amount and type of risk that
an organization is prepared to pursue, retain or take.”
The amount and type of risk that an organisation is willing to take in order to meet their
strategic objectives
A risk appetite statement is a higher level statement, while risk tolerances are narrower.
Example:
Using a driving analogy, the speed limit that one can drive is 80 Kmph (risk appetite) with
the additional 20 Kmph grace window (risk tolerance), the radar flashes if catches one
driving at 101 Kmph (unacceptable risk). If you are currently driving 80 Kmph, you may
decide to go faster, as long as you do not exceed 100 Kmph.
The residual risk is the amount of risk or danger associated with an action or event
remaining after natural or inherent risks have been reduced by risk controls.
Inherent Risk: the natural level of risk inherent in a process or activity without doing
anything to reduce the likelihood or mitigate the severity of a mishap.
Risk Management Framework and Process
All standards for risk management contain frameworks for organisations to design their
RM programs.
Components apply on the organization as a whole and address the organization’s risks.
These components are to be adopted with the organization’s objectives and built in the
operations too.