The Big Cheat
The Big Cheat
Contents
INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 2
RUNBECK BALLOT DUPLICATION SOFTWARE .............................................................................................. 3
MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CASE DEFINED ............................................................................................. 32
EXPLANATION OF BLANK BALLOTS FROM ES&S DS850 OPERATORS MANUAL………………………………..33
VERIFICATION OF DATA SOURCE34
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON MARYLAND ELECTIONS BLANK BALLOTS ........................................................ 35
BALLOTS CAST – BLANK EXPLAINED…………………………………………………………………………………………………35
RUNBECK BALLOT DUPLICTAION SOFTWARE – SCREENSHOTS……………………………………………………….42
EXHIBIT Y1 - MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST ...... 45
EXHIBIT Y2 – MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST .... 48
EXHIBIT W – UG RTR USER GUIDE 5.11 .................................................................................................... 100
END OF DOCUMENT .................................................................................................................................. 101
1
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
INTRODUCTION
Mail-in paper ballots cast by voters are being fed into ES&S and Dominion tabulators on election days. For an
example, we’ll use 100 ballots. Of the 100 recorded by those tabulators, a certain percentage is categorized as
“Blank Ballots”. This can range from 0.5% up to over 10%. We’ll use 5% here. The electronic images of the
ballots, generated by the tabulators, are then sent to the county Clerk. There is the “brains” of the ES&S or
Dominion system. It is commonly called the “EMS” which stands for Election Management System. We have
found patented software then takes those 5% Blank Ballots out of the original 100 in our example, thus five,
and votes the five ballots for any candidate or race the corrupt person wishes. Our information is from the
reports of the computerized voting systems at the county level. We have found this in multiple states already.
The manuals of each company also show that software is part of this scheme. Such software has no business
whatsoever, being in computerized voting systems. It makes them all uncertifiable. A ballot fed into a
tabulator should either be fully accepted or entirely rejected; not placed into a secret file awaiting
“adjustment” by some unknown person. Just one person with access could vote thousands of “Blank Ballots”.
We also found that this software is in the largest counties of various states, but not in the medium or smaller
counties.
In Maryland, President Trump won the race in 2020 and the evidence is within the report below. Some of the
software being used can perform its job but then leave no trace. We also show how Priscilla Zuckerberg is tied
to this scheme in Exhibits Y and X.
In Maryland during the 2020 General Election over 98K 100% Blank Ballots were cast. Did 98K voters go out
and cast a 100% blank ballot? What can be proven 100% is that in the 2020 General Election over 98K
Maryland voters had their votes changed/altered/adjudicated to blank. Their right to vote was taken entirely
away from them. Furthermore, the candidates on the wrong side lost all those votes. Our elections are rigged
big time.
2
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
RUNBECK BALLOT DUPLICATION SOFTWARE
The current contract between Runbeck and the Maryland Board of Elections contains “Ballot Duplication
Software”. A screenshot of this contract was obtained directly from the State of Maryland website at the
following location: https://dgs.maryland.gov/Documents/comm/printing/001B8400214.PDF
3
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
There are several key observations that must be made that are very clear in this contract/purchase order.
They are as follows:
1. “THE BALLOT DUPLICATION SOFTWARE ASSISTS THE LOCAL BOARDS WITH DUPLICATING ABSENTEE
BALLOTS DURING THE CANVASSING PERIOD (PRINTING).”
2. “THIS FEATURE WOULD ONLY BE USED BY SOME COUNTIES FOR SOME ELECTIONS- FOR EXAMPLE LARGER
COUNTIES FOR HIGH TURN OUT ELECTIONS.
FOR LOW TURN OUT ELECTIONS COUNTIES CAN HANDLE DUPLICATION ON THEIR OWN.”
To understand what this Runbeck Ballot Duplication Software does there are two sources of information that
were examined. The first source was the Runback Ballot Duplication Software Patent on file with the US
Patent Number US 2019/0311030 A. Attached to this document as EXHIBIT 2.
Below is a screenshot of what Runbeck Ballot Duplication Software was purposefully designed and intended to
do as extracted from sheet 3 of the patent application.
4
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
According to the patent application, the Ballot Duplication Software and Hardware are specifically designed to
function on computers that are not only connected to the internet but critically rely upon this internet
connectivity to function. See the image below that explains how the software is deployed to Amazon Web
Services and how it is configured to connect to other systems via API calls.
This is a significant breach of critical elections infrastructure and a violation of the EAC guidelines for
election security as well as CISA and DHS election security protocols.
Figure 3: Software deployed on AWS using API calls to connect to other systems
5
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
Based entirely on the information provided by Runbeck Systems, the United States Patent and Trademark
office and the State of Maryland the following can clearly be observed:
1. The State of Maryland entered a contract to purchase Runbeck Ballot Duplication Software for
$46,500.
2. The State of Maryland’s stated purpose of this software purchase was to duplicate absentee/vote-by-
mail ballots and then print the new “corrected ballots” so they could be cast and counted in the
elections.
3. The State of Maryland however, intended to limit the use of this software to only the most populous
counties in Maryland and would not be made available to the smaller counties as they were “capable
of doing this on their own”.
4. When examining the data contained in the EL45A Reports for all Maryland Counties an extremely
disturbing pattern becomes apparent to any reasonably prudent person. The more populous counties
that did have access to this “Ballot Duplication Software” also had massive numbers of “BLANK
BALLOTS – CAST”.
5. The pattern of “BLANK BALLOTS – CAST” occurring is not seen in the “Low Turn Out Election Counties”
that the State of Maryland refers to in the contract for the Runbeck Ballot Duplication Software.
6. The patterns observed in the data contained in the EL45A also show massive numbers of mail-in
ballots that do not appear to be genuine and indicate the presence of widespread election and voter
fraud, at a scale that would significantly impact the outcome of elections.
7. The Runbeck Ballot Duplication software is not certified for use in Maryland elections.
8. The Runbeck Ballot Duplication Software is being utilized on computers that are connected to the
internet.
9. There does not appear to be any audit trail of the Mail in Ballots that are being duplicated by Runbeck
Ballot Duplication Software.
10. DNI Responsibilities: President Obama signed Executive Order on National Critical Infrastructure on 6
January 2017, stating in Section 1. Cybersecurity of Federal Networks, "The Executive Branch operates
its information technology (IT) on behalf of the American people. The President will hold heads of
executive departments and agencies (agency heads) accountable for managing cybersecurity risk to
their enterprises. In addition, because risk management decisions made by agency heads can affect
the risk to the executive branch as a whole, and to national security, it is also the policy of the United
States to manage cybersecurity risk as an executive branch enterprise." President Obama's EO further
stated, effective immediately, each agency head shall use The Framework for Improving Critical
Infrastructure Cybersecurity (the Framework) developed by the National Institute of Standards and
Technology." Support to Critical Infrastructure at Greatest Risk. The Secretary of Homeland Security, in
6
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
coordination with the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, the Director of National
Intelligence, the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the heads of appropriate sector-
specific agencies, as defined in Presidential Policy Directive 21 of February 12, 2013 (Critical
Infrastructure Security and Resilience) (sector-specific agencies), and all other appropriate agency
heads, as identified by the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall: (i) identify authorities and
capabilities that agencies could employ to support the cybersecurity efforts of critical infrastructure
entities identified pursuant to section 9 of Executive Order 13636 of February 12, 2013 (Improving
Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity), to be at greatest risk of attacks that could reasonably result in
catastrophic regional or national effects on public health or safety economic security, or national
security (section 9 entities); This is a national security imperative. In July 2018, President Trump
strengthened President Obama’s Executive Order to include requirements to ensure US election
systems, processes, and its people were not manipulated by foreign meddling, either through
electronic or systemic manipulation, social media, or physical changes made in hardware, software, or
supporting systems. The 2018 Executive Order. Accordingly, I hereby order: 6 Section 1. (a) Not later
than 45 days after the conclusion of a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in
consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and agencies (agencies),
shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating that a foreign government, or any person
acting as an agent of or on behalf of a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of
interfering in that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent ascertainable, the
nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed to execute it, the persons involved, and
the foreign government or governments that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The
Director of National Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting information
to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the
Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security. This is a national security issue.
11. The use of this Runbeck Ballot Duplication software on computers that connect to the internet violates
the EAC Guidelines that Maryland currently claims to adhere to.
7
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
8
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
9
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
10
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
11
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
12
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
13
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
14
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
15
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
16
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
17
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
18
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
19
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
20
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
21
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
22
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
23
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
24
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
25
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
26
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
27
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
28
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
29
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
30
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
31
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CASE DEFINED
32
Copyright 2023 Chris Gleason, Election Watch, Inc.
EXPLANATION OF BLANK BALLOTS FROM ES&S DS850 OPERATORS MANUAL
That the numbers in the preceding reports are official Maryland government records
which I extracted and reproduced verbatim before adding the (Red & Blue)
Comment Notes.
I swear or affirm that the above and foregoing representations are true and correct
to the best of my information, knowledge, and belief.
Date: 03/07/2023
Respectfully Submitted,
Christopher Gleason
PRELIMINARY REPORT ON MARYLAND ELECTIONS BLANK BALLOTS
The red rectangle represents the total votes cast that were classified as “BALLOTS
CAST – BLANK”. This category of BALLOTS CAST – BLANK can be seen as reflected
in each of the five ballot categories. EV, ED, MB1, Prov, MB2
FIGURE 1
Every single ballot that was cast by a Maryland voter and then classified as a
“BALLOTS CAST – BLANK” is the ballot of a voter being disenfranchised.
Blank ballots being cast in such large numbers are a clear indicator of either voting
system machine hardware errors, software accuracy errors, machine tampering,
or some other illegal activity used to materially affect the outcome of an election.
In this particular precinct in Baltimore County Maryland over 25% of all the ballots
cast by voters have been classified as “BLANK BALLOTS”.
FIGURE 3
4. EAC – Voting Systems Performance Guidelines: Accuracy and Functional
Requirements For Software used in voting systems. In the following section of the
EAC certification, the accuracy requirement is very clear, as it states: “SHALL
MAINTAIN ABSOLUTE CORRECTNESS”.
“g. In all systems, voting system software, firmware, and hardwired logic shall
maintain absolute correctness (introduce no errors) in the recording, tabulating,
and reporting of votes”.
FIGURE 4
5. EAC – Voting Systems Performance Guidelines: Accuracy for Hardware
Requirements. The benchmark is derived from the “maximum acceptable error
rate of 1 in 125,000. Therefore 2 or more errors in every 125,000 votes would
exceed the maximum acceptable error rate.
FIGURE 5
6. EAC – Voting Systems Performance Guidelines: Accuracy Requirement Hardware
Calculations. According to the EAC guidelines as prescribed under the Help
America Vote Act of 2002 presenting this benchmark in terms of votes instead of
ballot positions provides a more precise metric for the evaluation of accuracy.
FIGURE 6
RUNBECK BALLOT DUPLICTAION SOFTWARE – SCREENSHOTS
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRAND AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST – EL5A DATA - EXHIBIT Y1
EXHIBIT Y1 - MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST
MARYLAND COUNTY 2020 GRANT AMOUNT 2020 UNOFFICIAL BLANK BALLOTS CAST 2022 UNOFFICIAL BLANK BALLOTS CAST
PRINCE GEORGES $1,325,384.00 16,684 22,453
BALTIMORE CITY $1,147,043.00 12,796 6,506
BALTIMORE COUNTY $1,044,824.00 26,845 19,678
MONTGOMERY $801,913.00 41,680 20,098
HOWARD $688,226.00 12 1,770
ANNE ARUNDEL $330,076.00 11 4,157
HARFORD $181,537.00 10 1,892
CHARLES $129,030.00 8 436
FREDERICK $121,975.00 12 1,187
WASHINGTON $90,512.00 4 871
CARROLL $76,536.00 11 3
WICOMICO $67,168.00 2 911
CALVERT $47,492.00 1 85
CECIL $45,975.00 2 680
ALLEGHENY $41,475.00 2 271
QUEEN ANNE'S $22,650.00 0 80
DORCHESTER $22,352.00 2 3
TALBOT $20,650.00 3 476
CAROLINE $19,108.00 0 0
KENT $12,696.00 0 121
GARRETT $9,478.00 2 357
WORCESTER $0.00 4 0
SOMERSET $0.00 0 1
ST MARY'S $0.00 4 320
Total Amounts $6,246,100.00 98,095 82,356
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y1
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
MARYLAND COUNTY 2020 GRANT AMOUNT 2020 UNOFFICIAL BLANK BALLOTS CAST 2022 UNOFFICIAL BLANK BALLOTS CAST
MONTGOMERY $801,913.00 41,680 20,098
BALTIMORE COUNTY $1,044,824.00 26,845 19,678
PRINCE GEORGES $1,325,384.00 16,684 22,453
BALTIMORE CITY $1,147,043.00 12,796 6,506
HOWARD $688,226.00 12 1,770
FREDERICK $121,975.00 12 1,187
ANNE ARUNDEL $330,076.00 11 4,157
CARROLL $76,536.00 11 3
HARFORD $181,537.00 10 1,892
CHARLES $129,030.00 8 436
WASHINGTON $90,512.00 4 871
WORCESTER $0.00 4 0
ST MARY'S $0.00 4 320
TALBOT $20,650.00 3 476
WICOMICO $67,168.00 2 911
CECIL $45,975.00 2 680
ALLEGHENY $41,475.00 2 271
DORCHESTER $22,352.00 2 3
GARRETT $9,478.00 2 357
CALVERT $47,492.00 1 85
QUEEN ANNE'S $22,650.00 0 80
CAROLINE $19,108.00 0 0
KENT $12,696.00 0 121
SOMERSET $0.00 0 1
Total Amounts $6,246,100.00 98,095 82,356
46
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y1
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
MARYLAND COUNTY 2020 GRANT AMOUNT 2020 UNOFFICIAL BLANK BALLOTS CAST 2022 UNOFFICIAL BLANK BALLOTS CAST
EXHIBIT Y2 – MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
48
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
Figure 1.
49
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
Figure 2.
According to Montgomery County during EV (Early Voting), there were 6,630 “BLANK” Ballots Cast.
These “BALLOTS CAST – BLANK” comprised of 5.15% of all the ballots cast.
50
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
Figure 3.
According to Montgomery County during ED (Election Day), there were 2,753 “BLANK” Ballots Cast.
These “BALLOTS CAST – BLANK” comprised of 6.77% of all the ballots cast.
51
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
Figure 4.
According to Montgomery County during MB1 (Mail in Ballot 1), there were 12,211 “BLANK” Ballots Cast.
These “BALLOTS CAST – BLANK” comprised of 6.84% of all the ballots cast.
52
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
Figure 5.
According to Montgomery County during MB2 (Mail in Ballot 2), there were 17,539 “BLANK” Ballots Cast.
These “BALLOTS CAST – BLANK” comprised of 10.34% of all the ballots cast.
53
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
Figure 6.
According to Montgomery County during Prov (Provisional), there were 2,547 “BLANK” Ballots Cast.
These “BALLOTS CAST – BLANK” comprised of 13.16% of all the ballots cast.
54
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
55
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
56
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
57
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
58
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
59
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
60
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
61
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
62
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
63
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
64
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
65
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
66
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
67
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
68
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
69
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
70
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
71
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
72
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
73
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
74
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
75
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
76
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
77
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
78
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
79
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
80
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
81
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
82
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
83
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
84
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
85
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
86
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA EXHIBIT Y2
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
87
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
88
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
89
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
90
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
91
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
92
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
93
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
94
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
95
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
96
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
97
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot 2
98
MARYLAND ZUCKERBUCK GRANT AMOUNTS
EXHIBIT Y2
AND MARYLAND BLANK BALLOTS CAST- EL45A DATA
% = % of Total
EV = Early Voting
ED = Election Day
MB1 = Mail in Ballot 1
Prov = Provisional
MB2 = Mail in Ballot
99
EXHIBIT W – UG RTR USER GUIDE 5.11
According to the Colorado Dominion manual, it is the "Machine Report," provided the
"Include blank ballots" parameter is set to true.
Here is the manual page:
UG_RTR_UserGuide_5.11_CO.pdf
1. Machine Report
Allows the user to create summary reports per tabulator optionally broken down per
precinct.
• Show page number: if set true the page number will be included in the report
• Show printed time: if set true the date and time of when the report was
produced will be included in the report.
• Extra Vertical Space: if set true there will be extra vertical space between each
line of content.
• Page size: select the page length: Letter, Legal, Ledger. Will not affect the
preview.
• Add party to candidate names: if set to true the party abbreviation is included in
the choice name. For example, "John Doe" vs. "PTY – John Doe".
• Display blank totals: if set to true, none of the votes will be shown in the report,
the turnout section if included will show all relevant content.
• Split tabulator per precinct: if set to true results per tabulator will be broken
down per precinct.
• Include blank ballots: if set to true the number of blank ballots cast containing
the contest will be shown.