Financial Accounting 6th Edition Weygandt Solutions Manual
Financial Accounting 6th Edition Weygandt Solutions Manual
Financial Accounting 6th Edition Weygandt Solutions Manual
Brief A B
Study Objectives Questions Exercises Exercises Problems Problems
1. (a) Generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) are a set of standards and rules, having
substantial authoritative support, that are recognized as a general guide for financial
reporting.
(b) The bodies that provide authoritative support for GAAP are the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
2. The FASB’s conceptual framework consists of the following:
(1) Objectives of Financial Reporting.
(2) Qualitative Characteristics of Accounting Information.
(3) Elements of Financial Statements.
(4) Operating Guidelines (Assumptions, Principles, and Constraints).
3. (a) According to the FASB in its development of the conceptual framework, the objectives of
financial reporting are to provide information that: (1) is useful to those making investment and
credit decisions, (2) is helpful in assessing future cash flows, and (3) identifies the economic
resources (assets), the claims to those resources (liabilities), and the changes in those
resources and claims.
(b) The qualitative characteristics are: (1) relevance, (2) reliability, (3) comparability, and
(4) consistency.
4. Quiney is correct. Consistency means using the same accounting principles and accounting methods
from period to period within a company. Without consistency in the application of accounting
principles, it is difficult to determine whether a company is better off, worse off, or the same from
period to period.
5. Comparability results when different companies use the same accounting principles. Consistency
means using the same accounting principles and methods from year to year within the same
company.
6. The going concern assumption is necessary because otherwise depreciation and amortization
policies would not be justifiable and appropriate. Also, the current-noncurrent classification of
assets and liabilities would lose much of its significance. Labeling anything as fixed or long-term
would be difficult to justify. In addition, the going concern assumption lends credibility to the cost
principle.
7. Revenue should be recognized in the accounting period in which it is earned. The sales basis
involves an exchange transaction between the seller and buyer and the sales price provides an
objective measure of the amount of revenue realized.
8. Expired costs generate revenues only in the current period and therefore are expensed immediately.
Unexpired costs will generate revenues in current and future periods and are recorded as assets.
9. (a) The accountant discloses information about an entity’s financial position, operations, and cash
flows in the financial statements, or in the notes that accompany the statements.
(b) The trade-offs involved with disclosure balance the costs of preparing additional information and
the benefits from using it.
10. Cost is used because it is both relevant and reliable. Cost is relevant because it represents the price
paid, the assets sacrificed, or the commitment made at the date of acquisition. Cost is reliable
because it is objectively measurable, factual, and verifiable. It is the result of an exchange transaction.
As a result, cost is the basis used in preparing financial statements.
11. The two constraints are materiality and conservatism. The materiality constraint means that an item
may be so small that failure to follow generally accepted accounting principles will not influence the
decision of a reasonably prudent investor or creditor. The conservatism constraint means that when
in doubt, the accountant chooses the accounting method that is least likely to overstate assets and
net income.
13. Three relationships that are helpful in assessing profitability are: (1) the profit margin percentage (or
return on sales), (2) return on assets, and (3) return on common stockholders’ equity. More than one
profitability relationship is useful in that the relationships help in different types of analysis. Return on
sales, for example, measures the percentage of each sales dollar that is included in net income,
whereas return on assets measures the contribution of each dollar of assets in generating income.
The former, then, helps analyze profits in terms of revenues alone; the latter helps analyze profits in
terms of the asset base in generating sales and profits. If the return on assets is lower than
warranted, the company may not be using its assets effectively; if return on sales is lower than
warranted, the company may not be controlling costs effectively.
14. Natasha Company’s working capital (a) is $60,000 – $20,000 = $40,000, and its current ratio
(b) is $60,000 ÷ $20,000 = 3:1.
15. Whenever current assets are less than current liabilities, working capital is negative and the current
ratio will be less than 1:1. (Whenever current assets are greater than current liabilities, working
capital is positive and the current ratio is greater than 1:1.)
16. A debt to total assets ratio of 62% is fairly substantial. But more is involved in a credit decision than
just one financial statement relationship. Extension of additional credit will depend on Bozeman’s
overall liquidity (current ratio) and profitability (ability to generate revenue and cash) over the life of
the loan. Similarly, Bozeman’s credit history is important—its patterns of loan
repayment in the past. No one analytical relationship can provide sufficient information to determine
granting of additional credit.
17. There is little uniformity in accounting standards from country to country, although some efforts have
been made in this area by the International Accounting Standards Board.
18. The International Accounting Standards Board establishes international accounting standards,
although they are by no means universally applied.
(a) True.
(b) False.
(c) True.
(a) No.
(b) Yes.
(c) Yes.
(a) No.
(b) Yes.
(c) Yes.
(a) Relevant.
(b) Reliability.
(c) Consistency.
(a) 1.
(b) 2.
(c) 3.
(d) 4.
(a) 2.
(b) 3.
(c) 1.
(d) 4.
(a) Conservatism.
(b) Conservatism.
(c) Materiality.
(d) Materiality.
EXERCISE 7-1
EXERCISE 7-2
(a) This is a violation of the cost principle. The inventory was written up to
its market value when it should have remained at cost. Thus, no journal
entry should have been made.
(b) This is also a violation of the cost principle because the equipment was
recorded at its estimated market value and not its exchange value. The
correct journal entry is:
(c) This is a violation of the economic entity assumption. The accounting for
the transaction treats Mark Nabke and Vicki Prowitz Company as one
entity when they are two separate entities. No journal entry should have
been made since Nabke should have used personal assets to purchase
the truck. If cash assets of the company were used, the debit entry could
be to Accounts Receivable—M. Nabke.
EXERCISE 7-3
EXERCISE 7-4
4. $0. No revenue should be recognized until the sale of the inventory has
occurred.
EXERCISE 7-6
Revenues
Net sales .............................................. $2,156,900
Gain on the sale of equipment ........... 80,000
Interest revenue .................................. 300,000
Total revenues ............................. 2,536,900
Expenses
Cost of goods sold ............................. $1,499,900
Selling and administrative
expenses ......................................... 340,750
Interest expense ................................. 90,000
Total expenses ............................ 1,930,650
Income before income taxes ..................... 606,250
Income tax expense ................................... 150,000
Net income .................................................. $ 456,250
(2) Income from operations = Gross profit – Selling and admin. exp.
$657,000 – $340,750 = $316,250.
(c) Profit margin percentage (rate of return on sales) = Net income ÷ Net sales
= $456,250 ÷ $2,156,900
= 21.15%
EXERCISE 7-7
(b) All three companies are manufacturers and distributors of products, each
being a leader in its product industry—Intel as a manufacturer of high-
tech computer chips and processors; Johnson & Johnson as a
manufacturer of health care products; and Motorola as a manufacturer of
electronics and communication products. Intel and Johnson & Johnson are
the dominant players in their industries and enjoy competitive advantages
and operating efficiencies that earn above average returns
on sales, assets, and stockholders’ equity; both had very profitable
performances. Motorola in this year was still recovering (staging a
turnaround) from several years of operating losses and a change in
management as well as a bursting of the high-tech industry bubble—
therefore its low return on sales, assets, and stockholders’ equity.
EXERCISE 7-9
ARUBA CORPORATION
Balance Sheet
December 31, 2008
Assets
Current assets
Cash............................................................................. $ 62,000
Short-term investments ............................................. 53,000
Accounts receivable ................................................... 121,000
Inventories .................................................................. 300,000
Total current assets ............................................ 536,000
Property, plant, and equipment ......................................... 900,000
Total assets ................................................................. $1,436,000
PROBLEM 7-1A
4. Cost principle. Appreciation in value does not justify a gain until the land
is sold. Appreciation does not involve an exchange transaction. No entry
is necessary.
4. It appears from the information that the sale should be recorded in the
next year instead of the current year. Regardless of whether the terms are
FOB shipping point or FOB destination, the point is that the inventory is
to be sold in the next year. Therefore, the revenue recognition principle is
violated. It should be noted that if the company is employing a perpetual
inventory system in dollars and quantities, a debit to Cost of Goods Sold
and a credit to Inventory are also necessary in the next year.
(c) 9. Materiality.
Equipment 840,000
Less: Accum. deprec. 715,000 125,000 1,294,000
Total assets $2,008,000
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock 300,000
Retained earnings 440,000 740,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $2,008,000
$714,000
(b) Current ratio: = 1.70:1
$420,250
$1,268,000
Debt to total assets: = 63.1%
$2,008,000
Operating expenses
Selling expenses
Commissions expense $1,200,000
Advertising expense 123,000
Freight-out 82,500
Miscellaneous selling
expenses 39,000 1,444,500
Administrative expenses
Wages and salaries 1,264,000
Rent expense 808,000
Insurance expense 600,000
Utilities expense 117,000
Depreciation expense 98,000
Miscellaneous
administrative
expenses 53,200 2,940,200
Total operating
expenses 4,384,700
Income from operations 1,232,300
$814,100
(b) Profit margin percentage: = 8.78%
$9,275,000
$814,100
Return on assets: = 10.84%
$7,509,000
$3,533,600*
Debt to total assets: = 47.06%
$7,509,000
*$7,509,000 – $3,975,400
2. The cost principle indicates that assets and liabilities are to be accounted
for on the basis of cost. If we were to select sales value, for
example, we would have an extremely difficult time in attempting to
establish a sales value for the given item without selling it. It should
further be noted that the revenue recognition principle provides the
answer to when revenue (gain) should be recognized. Revenue should be
recognized when it is earned. In this situation, an earnings process has
definitely not taken place.
3. It appears from the information that the sale should be recorded in the
next year instead of the current year. Regardless of whether the terms are
FOB shipping point or FOB destination, the point is that the inventory is
to be sold in the next year. Therefore, the revenue recognition principle is
violated. It should be noted that if the company is employing a perpetual
inventory system in dollars and quantities, a debit to Cost of Goods Sold
and a credit to Inventory are also necessary in the next year.
(a) 9. Materiality.
Long-term liabilities
Bonds payable 1,750,000
Mortgage payable 310,000 2,060,000
Total liabilities 2,873,000
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock 500,000
Retained earnings 447,000 947,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $3,820,000
$1,435,500
(b) Current ratio: = 1.77:1
$813,000
$2,873,000
Debt to total assets: = 75.21%
$3,820,000
Operating expenses
Selling expenses
Sales staff wages $155,000
Advertising expense 130,000
Miscellaneous selling
expenses 39,000
Freight-out 6,800 330,800
Administrative expenses
Managerial salaries 129,800
Rent expense 81,000
Insurance expense 57,000
Depreciation expense 53,000
Utilities expense 30,300
Miscellaneous
administrative
expenses 22,200 373,300
Total operating
expenses 704,100
Income from operations 238,000
$167,930
(b) Profit margin percentage: = 6.31%
$2,660,000
$167,930
Return on assets: = 3.08%
$5,460,000
$3,493,800*
Debt to total assets: = 63.99%
$5,460,000
*$5,460,000 – $1,966,200
(c) Return on assets is very low, and the profit margin percentage (rate of
return on sales) is also quite low for a specialty retailer. The leather
shops are also carrying a fairly large amount of debt. Two other balance
sheet relationships would be useful, in addition to other information,
before making a decision: current ratio and working capital. These would
help tell you whether or not the company can reasonably be expected to
pay its short-term obligations on time.
Assets
Current assets
Cash $ 165,000
Marketable securities (short-term) 1,175,000
Accounts receivable 1,000,800
Inventories 984,000
Prepaid expenses 356,100
Total current assets 3,680,900
Property, plant, and equipment
Equipment $5,894,000
Less: Accumulated depreciation 1,560,000 4,334,000
Intangible assets
Patents and other intangibles 1,150,100
Total assets $9,165,000
NU WOOD CORPORATION
Balance Sheet (Continued)
December 31, 2008
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock 2,200,000
Retained earnings 1,018,500 3,218,500
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $9,165,000
Debt $5,946,500
(3) Debt to total assets = = = 64.88%
Assets $9,165,000
(g) Nu Wood Corporation’s balance sheet is stronger than that of Notting Hill
Corporation, but its profitability (except for profit margin percentage) is
weaker. The stronger profit margin percentage augurs well for Nu Wood,
particularly combined with its stronger balance sheet. We would need to
know, however, what the pattern over time has been. There may, for
example, be special circumstances that have affected the analytical
relationships for the current year. Nu Wood had a gain on the sale of
land, while Notting Hill took a small loss on the sale of equipment.
Recalculating the profit margin percentage, excluding these items (but
without adjusting income taxes), changes the profit margin percentage as
follows:
(f) The basic assumptions used in accounting are the economic entity
assumption, the monetary unit assumption, the time period assumption,
and the going concern assumption.
(b) Liquidity measures the ability of a company to pay its maturing obligations
and meet unexpected needs for cash. Based on the current ratio and
working capital, both PepsiCo and Coca-Cola had positive current ratios
and working capital in 2005. For every dollar of current liabilities in 2005,
PepsiCo had $1.11 of current assets while Coca-Cola had $1.04 of current
assets per dollar of current liabilities.
(b) The FASB receives many requests for action on various financial
accounting and reporting topics from all segments of its diverse
constituency, including the SEC. The auditing profession is sensitive to
emerging trends in practice, and consequently it is a frequent source of
requests. Requests for action include both new topics and suggested
review or reconsideration of existing pronouncements.
(c) Actions of the FASB have an impact on many organizations within the
Board’s large and diverse constituency. It is essential that the Board’s
decision-making process be evenhanded. Accordingly, the FASB follows
and extensive “due process” that is open to public observation and
participation. This process was modeled on the Federal Administrative
Procedure Act and, in several respects, is more demanding.
(a) The underlying rationale for the current ratio is to measure the ability of a
company to pay its obligations as they become due. Included in the
numerator of the current ratio are all current assets—prepaid
assets and inventory as well as cash and receivables. If inventory and
prepaid assets represent a relatively small part of total current assets,
then the highly liquid assets like cash and receivables effectively cover
current liabilities, and a current ratio as high as 2:1 is not necessary.
Note: Most retailers have a year-end at the end of January, when their
inventories are at their lowest point. It is reasonable for current assets to
consist predominantly of liquid assets at year-end, when receivables are
high after holiday-season sales. Similar end-of-year circumstances can
apply in other industries as well. Here, only the mining /oil company’s
current ratio seems exceptionally low.
(b) The more capital-intensive the industry, the more likely the industry is to
have a high debt to total assets ratio. Oil exploration and extraction entail
large investments in equipment, so that the mining/oil company’s relatively
high ratio might be normal for the industry. A retailer that is adding
stores to its asset base would be likely to be adding mortgages on those
buildings to its total liabilities; expansion, then, is a company-specific
reason for differing debt to total assets ratios. Other explanations are
possible.
(c) Any relationship with “return” in its title has “net income” in the
numerator. A decrease in net income, all other things being equal, will
lead to a decrease in return on common stockholders’ equity. Stable net
income or even increasing net income can also occur when stockholders’
equity increases at a greater rate: new equity and new debt would
increase total assets and could lead to a decreasing return on common
stockholders’ equity and a relatively stable debt to total
assets ratio. In this particular case, the merchandising company’s net
income decreased by 26.9% and the manufacturing company’s net
income decreased by 11.8%. Neither raised substantial amounts of new
capital by either debt or equity financing.
(d) The earnings per share measure is dependent on the number of shares
outstanding; if the number increases, EPS decreases—all other things
being equal. So the decrease in EPS, by itself, may not signal a
problem. If the decline is the result of a decrease in net income (see (c)
above), there may be greater cause for concern. Other information,
however, is likely to outweigh using just EPS alone or even a clear
decline in net income. The manufacturing company, for example, has a
history of developing new and useful products, so its long-term
prospects could easily make up for ratio deficiencies in any one year. The
merchandising company’s recent acquisitions also could provide a signal
of long-term prospects for the company.
3. Faculty salaries for teaching and research probably constitute the largest
share of the expenses charged to grants and special programs. Other
expenses that might be matched against the grant revenues are teaching
and research assistant salaries and wages, special equipment, laboratory
supplies, books and research materials, computer usage time, computer
software, secretarial salaries, rent of off-campus classrooms or other
space, and overhead (a significant charge made by universities to cover
administrative costs, facilities usage costs, and all incidental costs).
(c) Michael appears to have little to gain except the satisfaction of issuing a
set of financial statements that apparently results in a much fairer
presentation of the company’s financial condition and earnings.