0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views4 pages

Ladder of Inference Overview

The Ladder of Inference describes a common mental process where people draw conclusions based on limited or ambiguous information and assumptions. It can lead to misguided beliefs if not properly examined and questioned. The ladder provides a framework to structure communications by making one's thinking and assumptions visible and seeking others' perspectives. It involves stating the data, assumptions, conclusions, and being open to questioning and alternative views to develop shared understanding.

Uploaded by

formationowerri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
51 views4 pages

Ladder of Inference Overview

The Ladder of Inference describes a common mental process where people draw conclusions based on limited or ambiguous information and assumptions. It can lead to misguided beliefs if not properly examined and questioned. The ladder provides a framework to structure communications by making one's thinking and assumptions visible and seeking others' perspectives. It involves stating the data, assumptions, conclusions, and being open to questioning and alternative views to develop shared understanding.

Uploaded by

formationowerri
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

The Ladder of Inference

The ladder of inference was first developed by Chris Argyris


and included in The Fifth Discipline Fieldbook by Peter
Senge, et. Al., Doubleday, 1994

Ladder of inference – a common mental pathway of increasing abstraction, often leading to misguided
beliefs. The ladder of inference is a useful tool that provides a framework to structure some of our
communications and connect people. It can support us in ensuring common understanding.

We live in a world of self-generating beliefs (bubbles) that remain largely untested. We adopt those beliefs
because they are based on conclusions, which are inferred from what we observe, plus our past experience.
Our ability to achieve the results we truly desire is eroded by our feelings that:

• Our beliefs are the truth.


• The truth is obvious.
• Our beliefs are based on real data.
• The data we select are the real data.

the science of thinking… ©The Human Factor. Inc. [email protected] www.TheHumanFactor.biz 1


Using the ladder of inference
You can’t live your life without adding meaning or drawing conclusions. It would be an inefficient, tedious way
to live. But you can improve your communications through reflection, and by using the ladder of inference in
three ways:

• Becoming more aware of your own thinking and reasoning (reflection);


• Making your thinking and reasoning more visible to others (advocacy)
• Inquiring into others’ thinking and reasoning (inquiry).

Make your thinking process visible. Try to picture the other people’s perspectives on what you are saying.

What To Do What To Say


State your assumptions and describe the data Here’s what I think, and here’s how I got there.
that led to them.
Explain your assumptions. I assumed that…
Make your reasoning explicit: I came to this conclusion because…
• who will be affected
• how will they be affected
• why
Give examples of what you propose Imagine that…

Publicly test your conclusions and assumptions.

What To Do What To Say


Encourage others to explore your model, your What do you think about what I just said?
assumptions, and your data. Refrain from
defensiveness.
Reveal where you are least clear in your thinking. Here’s one aspect which you might help me think
through…
Listen, stay open, and encourage others to Do you see it differently?
provide different views.

Ask others to make their thinking process visible.

What To Do What To Say


Gently walk others down the ladder of inference. What leads you to conclude that? Can you help me
understand your thinking here?
Explain your reasons for inquiring. I’m asking you about your assumptions here
because…
Check your understanding of what they have said. Am I correct that you’re saying…?

the science of thinking… ©The Human Factor. Inc. [email protected] www.TheHumanFactor.biz 2


The Ladder of Inference as a Leadership Development Tool

Enhancing Communication
In presentations:
Organize your thoughts to follow the thinking process that adult humans utilize to make conclusions.
Describe the data you have and the meaning that data has to you/the industry/experts in the field.
Use phrases such as: “Here’s the data that I have and what I believe it means.”

Explain your assumptions. “Based on this data, I have made the following assumptions relative to our
project...”

Test your assumptions by encouraging others to ask you questions. “What do you think about what I
just said? Do these ideas seem reasonable to you? Are there some additional assumptions I should
make?”

State your conclusions. At this point, it is very important that you make your reasoning visible—who &
what will be affected, how will they be affected, and why. “I came to this conclusion because…and the
way I believe it will impact our business is…”

Remain open and let others know you are open to discussing the decision at any of these levels – perhaps
someone else has different data or they attributed different meaning to the same data. Pose questions such
as: “Does anyone have any additional data he/she would like to contribute? Is there something I have
missed here? Can anyone think of a different implication for this information?”

Remember that it is very possible others will come to different conclusions based on the same data because
their meanings and assumptions could vary dramatically. The key to effectiveness is exploring this early in a
decision process and coming to a common understanding.

Use open body language – stand with your hands behind your back, demonstrate you are listening when
asked questions by tilting your head slightly and looking directly at the speaker. Clarify the question asked.
Remember that a question that includes your thoughts is really just a different form of telling. Don’t try to
mask your opinions in questions. Expose your thinking and then really allow others to expose theirs by truly
inquiring as to what they believe.

the science of thinking… ©The Human Factor. Inc. [email protected] www.TheHumanFactor.biz 3


I n m eetings:
Remember that due to the pace we typically operate at and the speed of business today, it is natural to want
to move quickly when trying to convince or influence others of your ideas. This often leads to a surface
agreement to an idea that quickly falls apart in the days that follow. However, if you slow down slightly in
explaining your idea, you will end up saving a lot of time because you can achieve deeper levels of agreement.
Expose and discuss your thinking process with others.

Describe the data you have and the meaning that data has to you/the industry/experts in the field. Use
phrases such as: “Here’s the data that I have and what I believe it means.”

Explain your assumptions. “Based on this data, I have made the following assumptions relative to our
project...”

State your conclusions. At this point, it is very important that you make your reasoning visible—who &
what will be affected, how will they be affected, and why. “I came to this conclusion because…and
they way I believe it will impact our business is…”

Reveal to others where you are least clear in your thinking. Ask questions to engage others such as:
“Here’s one aspect I could use some help thinking through. What do you think? What do you believe I
should consider further? Let’s brainstorm some other alternatives as to what this information means.”

Refrain from defensiveness when you are questioned. Remain open and let others know you are open
to discussing the decision at any of these levels – perhaps someone else has different data or they
attributed different meaning to the same data. Remember that it is very possible others will come to
different conclusions based on the same data because their meanings and assumptions could vary
dramatically. The key to effectiveness is exploring this early in a decision process.

Explain your ideas and ask others to do the same by exposing the thinking process—“Here’s what I think
and here’s how I got there…Here’s the data I have and what it means to be…These are the assumptions I
made about the information I have…I formed these opinions because I have this data that means this to
me…What does it mean to you…Is there more data that you know of?” Ask others to make their thinking
process visible using the same types of questions and check your understanding of what others say. “Do I
understand you correctly that you believe the data means this…so your recommendation is based on the
assumption that…”
When asking questions of others, pause and really listen to the answer. Often times, we ask a question,
but we are really stating what we believe to be so such as: “Don’t you think…wouldn’t it be better if
we…?” These ‘false’ questions only lead to further discussions at our ‘conclusion’ level because we are
just trying to prove or convince others we are right. If you really want to engage others and care about
their input, ask for their opinion in a way that doesn’t include stating your own.

It may seem cumbersome following this approach initially because we are so accustomed to talking only about
our opinions or recommendations. However, over time, it can become a comfortable and highly effective
process.

the science of thinking… ©The Human Factor. Inc. [email protected] www.TheHumanFactor.biz 4

You might also like