Positive Attitudes Toward Mathematics Among Senior High School Students in Cape Coast Metropolis
Positive Attitudes Toward Mathematics Among Senior High School Students in Cape Coast Metropolis
Positive Attitudes Toward Mathematics Among Senior High School Students in Cape Coast Metropolis
Corresponding Author:
Florence Christianah Awoniyi
Department of Teacher Education, School of Education and Leadership, University of Ghana
Legon, Ghana
Email: [email protected]
1. INTRODUCTION
The Ghanaian government has embraced technology, science, and mathematics as means for
achieving national development [1], [2]. The fundamental goal of the Ghanaian mathematics curriculum is to
allow all Ghanaian youth to acquire the mathematical abilities, insights, attitudes, and values that they will
need to be successful in their chosen occupations and daily lives, which is a significant objective [1]. All
children can learn mathematics, and all students need to study mathematics, is the underlying tenet of the
programme. As a result, at the senior high school level, students are expected to acquire the necessary
mathematical skills to apply their knowledge to solving practical problems and, secondly, to be well-prepared
to pursue further education and related careers in mathematics, science, commerce, industry, and a variety of
other professions.
The acquisition and use of fundamental mathematical knowledge and abilities are given a lot of
attention in the curriculum. The mathematics curriculum is designed to give pupils the information, abilities,
and attitudes necessary for success in this age of technological innovation [3]. Numbers and numeration,
plane geometry, mensuration, algebra, statistics and probability, trigonometry, vectors, and transformation on
a plane are the main topics covered in the senior high school mathematics curriculum. The curriculum has
only recently been reviewed, and all Ghanaian students are expected to continue to place a high priority on
learning mathematics. The new curriculum places a strong emphasis on a set of rigorous, globally
benchmarked career and tertiary education requirements that students must master in order to pursue
postsecondary education, a career, or both [4]. This is due to the perception that mathematics achievement is
essential for both personal and societal advancement.
However, stakeholders in the education sector have not been at ease in the last eleven years due to
the fluctuations in performances of students at the West African Senior School Certificate Examination
(WASSCE). A good number of students are unable to further their education due to their inability to obtain a
credit pass in mathematics (where a credit pass means A 1 to C6). Table 1 depicts the performance of students
as reported by the General Resume of Chief Examiners’ report (WAEC, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017,
2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022).
Even though there has not been an excellent WASSCE results in mathematics in the last ten years,
there is a need to ponder on what made it possible for those who recorded credit passes in those years. Some
earlier studies have enumerated factors that challenge the teaching, learning, and outcomes in mathematics in
senior high schools. These factors can be categorised as school-based, such as student/teacher ratio or class
size and supervision; teacher factors, which include attitudes and beliefs, commitment, content knowledge,
pedagogical knowledge, experience, and qualification; student factors, which include intelligence, interests,
gender and early childhood learning; parental factors such as race, ethnicity, and social class; policy makers’
factors, such as inadequacy or lack of textbooks, assessment practices, under staffing and curriculum [5]–[9].
There are also studies that have demonstrated that students' attitudes towards mathematics contribute to their
mathematics performance, over and above personality and cognitive ability [10].
Hence, the testimonies of learners in particular can give crucial, first-hand evidence if the goal of
any inquiry into learning outcomes is to improve learning [11], [12]. If students are to provide descriptions of
their learning in any research, researchers should be more concerned about learners' perspectives regarding
their experiences in classrooms and schools than just ‘factual’ testimony in the legal sense. Although these
attitudes might not be considered acceptable proof in a court of law, they are an essential resource in an
investigation aimed at enhancing learning. Moreover, educators and other math teachers [13] largely concur
that students will perform better in mathematics if they enjoy it and that they will learn more successfully
when they are enthusiastic in what they are learning. This assertion corroborated the position of [14] that a
“positive attitude towards mathematics is thought to play an important role in causing students to learn
mathematics” (p. 631). This might be the case because students’ perceptions of mathematics and their
participation in the subject are influenced by their attitude. When students were asked to rate their subjects in
order of preference, the high achievers gave mathematics a much higher ranking than their peers, supporting
[15] argument that they had a more positive attitude towards mathematics than underachievers. Additional
research has shown that attitudes about mathematics are considerably and directly related to learners'
achievement [10], [16]–[19]. Hence, for this study, positive attitudes of students were delved into to proffer
evidence that are possibly responsible for these attitudes towards mathematics.
According to Hart [20], it takes a multidisciplinary approach to attitudes toward mathematics and
characterises a person's attitudes toward mathematics as a more complicated reality, characterized by the
feelings they have for mathematics, the ideas they have about it, and the way they act toward it. The learned
propensity of a person to react favourably or unfavourably to a thing, situation, idea, or another person is
referred to as attitude [21]. The definition by Hart [20] is more appealing for this study because it
encompasses the students' emotional, cognitive, and behavioural aspects. Howe and Krosnick have assigned
strength to attitudes [22]. These authors believe that the strength of one's attitude varies. The importance of
attitudes in moulding thinking and action in different settings is measured by their strength. Some people
have strong attitudes, while others have weak ones. Strong attitudes are those that have the greatest impact on
a person's ideas, intentions, and actions. Easy-to-change attitudes are weak and unlikely to influence
behaviour. The attitudes that have the greatest influence on behaviour are the most difficult to alter.
Additionally, Kahveci [23] and other researchers have developed many instruments that they have
used to gauge attitudes. Ajzen [24] suggests three behaviour-based measures. Personal commitment to the
behaviour, self-reported behaviour, and observable acts taken by the individuals and noted by the investigator
are some of them. Self-reported behaviour was used in this study since research [25], [26] has shown that
common scaling methods like the Likert scale can be used to obtain congruence between attitudes and
behaviour measurements. Hence, Kahveci's [23] adaptation of the Modified Fennema-Sherman Mathematics
Attitude Scales (FSMAS) was used in this study.
Due to the problems researchers have in this relatively new field of study, including theories that are
not yet fully formed, terminology that is employed inconsistently and differently, and a variety of research
tools [27], [28], there are also numerous classifications of the sub-constructs of attitude. For instance, [22]
suggested that three main groups of factors—self-interest, social identity, and values—generally impact
individual attitudes. Confidence, beliefs in the value of mathematics and its practical application, and
mathematical anxiety, according to Ashby [29], are additional factors that affect attitudes toward
mathematics. On the other hand, according to Lim and Chapman [30], attitudes toward mathematics can be
divided into three sub-constructs: i) Enjoyment of mathematics; ii) Self-confidence in mathematics; and iii)
Value of mathematics.
The first sub-construct, enjoyment of mathematics, refers to the emotions, passions, and feelings
that come with learning mathematics. Thus, enjoyment of mathematics refers to how much students love
doing and learning mathematics [31]. This means that students who like mathematics are likely to spend
more time with the subject. Consequently, they are likely to learn better, thereby recording higher
performance. The second sub-construct, self-confidence, is based on students’ conviction in their abilities to
learn the subject [32]. Thus, when students are prepared to face mathematical obstacles, it boosts their
academic performance. Meanwhile, students with low self-esteem easily give up the hope of achieving
success when confronted with some challenges in computing numerical tasks; thus, resulting in low
performance. The final sub-construct, value, refers to perceived usefulness of mathematics. This has to do
with students' opinions of the importance of mathematics in real life, either currently or in the future, or both
[32]. In the study conducted by Guy et al. [33], they discovered that the perceived usefulness of mathematics
was a positive predictor of success in the subject. The ability to see how useful the subject is to the
participants of their study (both then and in the future) may have played some role in the output they
produced in the subject.
Furthermore, there are eight sub-constructs of attitude, according to the modified Fennema-Sherman
Mathematics Attitude Scales. These are interest, social influence, value, perseverance, confidence, gender,
enjoyment, and perceived personal ability. Six of the sub-constructs will converge into the three sub-
constructs identified by Lim and Chapman [30], with the exception of the social influence and gender. The
perceived personal ability and confidence will converge into self-confidence, enjoyment, interest, and
perseverance will converge into the enjoyment of mathematics, and value is a stand-alone sub-construct. The
three thematic categories of attitudes must be present before we can declare that an attitude exists. The belief
that mathematics is easy to learn (that is, confidence or cognition), the desire to learn more mathematics (that
is, value or behaviour), and a positive emotion (affective), such as feeling joyful in a mathematics classroom.
This is otherwise known as the ABC model.
The ABC model of attitudes suggests that attitude has three components: affect, behaviour, and
cognition. The three elements denote the verbs ‘feel, do, and think’. The term ‘affect’ refers to a person’s
emotions and feelings about an attitude object. The term ‘behaviour’ denotes intentions, vocal declarations
related to behaviour, and actual action. The term ‘cognition’ has to do with knowledge and beliefs. These
three elements interact closely with one another and influence an individual’s attitude toward an object. Thus,
‘affect’ is represented by eagerness, trust, and belief. The ‘behaviour’ is said to be an experience or value.
Finally, ‘cognition’ is represented by knowledge, competence, or skill. This study, which follows the ABC
paradigm, focuses on attitude factors such as students' self-confidence in their mathematical aptitude,
mathematics enjoyment, and perceptions of mathematics' usefulness.
There have been differences in opinions among researchers regarding which of those sub-constructs
is the core of attitude. Some researchers, for example, Bandura [34] opined that self-confidence of the
individual to have a breakthrough in an activity will energise them to forge ahead despite all odds.
Meanwhile, other researchers, for example, Elliot [35] indicate that self-confidence will generate no
engagement with the task if the individuals do not value the activity. Nonetheless, the study of Lim and
Chapman [36] discovered that within the construct of attitudes, self-confidence was the strongest correlate of
achievement. This is in line with past findings [37] and suggested the importance of self-confidence in
obtaining better mathematics results, both in the short and longer terms. It is not surprising that the
government of Ghana has recently given recognition to the importance of attitude to learning in general, by
Positive attitudes toward mathematics among senior high school … (Florence Christianah Awoniyi)
186 ISSN: 2089-9823
indicating the percentage of attitude that learners are expected to demonstrate as a result of their cumulative
learning experiences in school [3].
Although there have been many studies that have investigated the attitudes of students to learning in
general and to mathematics in particular [5]–[8], many of these studies did well in focusing on attitudes of
students in general and concluded that negatvie attitudes were responsible for poor performances of students
in mathematics. However, there is a need to think outside the box and unearth the reasons behind those
students who possess positive attitudes towards the learning of mathematics, notwithsatnding the numerous
challenges confronting their adventures. Hence, the purpose of this study is to investigate the secrets behind
positive attitudes of senior high school students towards mathematics in the Cape Coast Metropolis. While
affirming positive practices that promote mathematics teaching and learning, the results might provide
insights on how to promote and incite positive changes in the attitudes of students in schools where there are
negative attitudes towards the teaching and learning of mathematics. Furthermore, the lingering problem of
not knowing exactly what can be done to improve the learning of mathematics may be brought at bay
because knowing the secret of positive attitudes towards the learning of mathematics, from [11], [38] would
mean opening rooms for more research into the characteristics of those positive attitudes. Invariably, once a
positive attitude is formed, students’ learning can be improved [17].
The following research question was formulated to guide the study: What are the secrets behind
positive attitudes of eleventh graders towards the learning of mathematics? However, to answer this question,
the following sub-questions were formulated: i) What are students’ understanding of attitudes in relation to
the learning of mathematics?; ii) How do students describe their experience with mathematics?; iii) How
much do students like or dislike mathematics?; and iv) Why do student like or dislike mathematics?
2. RESEARCH METHOD
A sequential explanatory mixed methods research design was adopted in this study. That is, both
quantitative (first to be used) and qualitative (as a follow-up) data were sequentially collected and analyzed.
This is because attitudes are primarily measured by attitude scales that show whether attitudes are positive or
negative. However, finding information about the attitudes of Ghanaian students, on the other hand,
necessitates qualitative methodologies [39] which allow for self-reporting. This will give room for the
research community to draw their own conclusions beyond what the researcher of this paper can produce.
Thus, this paper will report mainly qualitative data. Nonetheless, the quantitative part of the design that
was used for the survey helped to shortlist interviewees with positive attitudes for the qualitative data
collection exercise.
Focus group interviews were employed to collect the data for the qualitative component of
this study. Over 70% of the learners, 68% of whom were male and 32% of whom were female, were between
the ages of 16 and 18. All of the traditional programmes, including general science, business, general
arts, technical, home economics, and visual arts, were represented in the study with science and general
arts having the highest representations (28% and 24%, respectively), while technical had the lowest
presence (2%).
Four core subjects and four elective subjects are offered in all programmes. In addition to offering
four elective subjects each, the core disciplines are core mathematics, English language, social studies, and
integrated science. The optional combinations are different to accommodate the students' various future
needs as well as chosen university programmes and national objectives. For instance, the general science
programmes offer elective mathematics as well as physics, biology, and chemistry. The general arts
programme provides either government, history, christian religious studies, economics, literature, and
government as elective topics, or government, economics, French, or Twi (Ghanaian language). The business
programme offers options in financial accounting, cost accounting, economics, business management,
elective mathematics, economics, economics, and French. It also offers options in financial accounting, cost
accounting, economics, and business management. General knowledge in arts, sculpture, ceramics, pottery,
basketry, graphic design, textile/picture making, general knowledge in arts options, or leather works/jewelry,
general knowledge in arts, graphic design, and picture making/economics are the elective subjects available
for the visual arts programme. Home economics includes topics like food and nutrition, biology, living
arrangements, and general knowledge of the arts, as well as topics like clothes, biology, living arrangements,
and general knowledge of the arts. The technical programme also offers a variety of elective math courses
and other courses in metal, car mechanics, welding, electricals, and other fields.
from each of the 10 schools, which was a list of the population from which students were chosen as the
study's units. According to their class classification, which was based on the programme the students offered,
the form two learners were selected. Different schools used different letters (A1, B4, S2) to represent the
classroom groupings or categorization according to the programme or specialization of the student. For
example, School I (SchI) used 2S1, 2S2, 2S3, 2S4, and 2S5 to represent her five general science classes, with
37 students in each of the classes. School G (SchG) uses 2Aa and 2Ac, comprising 54 and 57 students,
respectively, to represent her two general art classes. To make selection in each of the schools, the
representations (2A1, 2S2, 2Ac) of form two for each school were put together, and the
required number of classes that added up to the sample size based on the recommendation of [40] were
randomly selected.
Although, intact classes were chosen to prevent interfering with the students' academic schedules,
the response rate of the participants was 77% (that is, 2575 students). The Fennema-Sherman Mathematics
Attitude Scales (FSMAS) with high reliability (.777≤ α ≤.942) was used to collect the quantitative data.
Participants were assigned to complete the FSMAS. The arithmetic mean from the survey data for each of the
students was arranged in ascending order, and 250 students from the higher end of the continuum [21] were
shortlisted for the interview (i.e. 250 students from the upper bounds). These represent those with a strong
positive attitude towards the learning of mathematics. Volunteers were solicited from among the 250
students. Consequently, 170 students volunteered to be interviewed, but only 140 (79% males and 21%
females) participated in the interview. The interview guides contained four items, namely: i) What is your
understanding of attitudes in relation to the learning of mathematics?; ii) How would you describe your
experience with mathematics?; iii) Do you like mathematics?; and iv) Why do you like mathematics? The
instruments were made available to four senior mathematics education scholars and were pilot-tested.
2.3. Interview
After the analysis of the pilot test of the instrument a checklist based on the common themes was
prepared, and it was used together with an interview guide. All the interviews were recorded. Hence, when
the lead interviewer asks a question, the companion ticks the checklist based on the response given by the
student. Consequently, for the main study, an interview guide, a checklist, a tape recorder, and a code book
for a backup were used. The interviews took place in each of the ten selected schools with an average of 14
students in a school. In addition, both the interviewers and the interviewees sat in circles. The seats were
coded for easy identification of the students' programmes of study. Nonetheless, the analysis was combined
for ease of reporting. The frequency of the responses was counted, giving rise to frequency counts and
percentages. However, because the respondents gave multiple responses the sum or percentage sum is
Positive attitudes toward mathematics among senior high school … (Florence Christianah Awoniyi)
188 ISSN: 2089-9823
meaningless. Each interview took 60 minutes on average and was managed by two interviewers. Each
individual school was assigned an alphabet (A to J), and each student was numbered St 1, St2, St3, …, for
example, the code, StC2, means ‘student 2 from school C’.
how their students’ vacation was spent, and particular attention was paid to the mathematics content taught
by vacation teachers with the intention of integrating some of the approaches where applicable to ensure
continuity. (StD1) indicated that their experience is stimulating “…I already learnt most of the topics during
the long vacation, prior to our resumption and I helped my friends as well while in school”.
Although there were complaints from some of the respondents based on the shared experiences,
these group of students were seen to be making effort to learn mathematics. The outstanding contributions
the extract from the interviews is making is constant practicing by the students promote the right attitude and
confidence in learning. For example, attending vacation lessons increase the length of time spent by the
students in the learning of mathematics.
However, the school mathematics teacher may need to show interest in what their students learnt
during vacations as a way of authenticating the work done or encouraging the students. Where possible,
integrating some of the approaches or methods used by the lesson teachers might help ensure continuity of
their students’ learning. In addition, reviewing students’ work or exercises (StB 1), step by step, might help
mathematics teachers identify errors and misconceptions and proffer solution.
Positive attitudes toward mathematics among senior high school … (Florence Christianah Awoniyi)
190 ISSN: 2089-9823
4. CONCLUSION
The study lends support to the mixed methods explanatory sequential approach. The clarity
produced during the interviews (e.g., the data items from StH 1 and StH6) would have been lost if only survey
was used. Secondly, it was revealed that although the students in this study have strong positive attitude
towards the learning of mathematics, they are faced with some challenges. Nonetheless, they persisted in
their learning of the subject because they valued mathematics for the utility of the subject, their career
aspirations, or admission into higher institutions of learning. This is in line with the theory of planned
behaviour, which indicates how hard people are willing to sacrifice to perform activities they believe will
bring desirable outcomes. Thirdly, the closeness or proximity of some of the students to mathematics, evident
in their vacation extra lessons, seems to boost their confidence. Consequently, since attitude is a predictor of
success, the students are likely to achieve better results in mathematics. Fourthly, the findings also affirm the
findings of some earlier studies on the beliefs of students about the relevance of mathematics in real life. If
students thought that mathematics might be used in their future life, this might change their appreciation of
mathematics and their commitment to mathematical tasks. Furthermore, reliance on national examination
results continue to constitute obstacles to the enjoyment associated with the learning of mathematics. The
Positive attitudes toward mathematics among senior high school … (Florence Christianah Awoniyi)
192 ISSN: 2089-9823
data items from some of the students (e.g., StD 5, StG6) in this study confirmed the earlier findings of some
researchers that the way the subject is assessed through time-written examination with no connections
between classroom mathematics and real-life applications hinders the attainment of high-quality mathematics
education as stipulated in the mathematics curriculum. Finally, study groups afford students the opportunity
to discuss mathematics, ask each other questions about the material at hand, encourage the weary ones among
them and provide feedback where necessary without intimidation. This is in line with the finding of some
studies that friendship is necessary for academic success.
Each school, classroom, or set of students is unique. Thus, teachers should endeavour to find out
how students in their classroom use mathematics and promote such adventures while teaching. Promoting
classroom collaboration may help students at their level to open up and receive help where necessary from
one another. Sampling the opinions of students at the beginning of every academic year before teaching
mathematics could create an opportunity for teachers to come to terms with their students' expectations and
maneuver their teachings to meet those expectations. Intermittently, the use of an “add comment” box in the
classroom for students to drop anonymous notes could help the teacher gather information and consequently
design helpful strategies. Furthermore, it may be interesting to find out in future research, the percentage of
junior high students that may be interested in learning mathematics at the senior high level if mathematics is
no longer compulsory for admissions into higher institutions of learning.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The proofreading of the manuscript was done by Professor Jonathan Fletcher of the School of
Education and Leadership, University of Ghana.
REFERENCES
[1] Curriculum Research and Development Division, Teaching curriculum for senior high school mathematics. Ghana: Ghana
Education Service, 2010.
[2] G. E. S. Ministry of Education, “Mathematics curriculum for primary schools: B1- B3,” 2019. https://nacca.gov.gh/wp-
content/uploads/2019/04/MATHS-LOWER-PRIMARY-B1-B3.pdf.
[3] Ministry of Education, National Pre-Tertiary-Education Curriculum Framework for developing subject Curricula. Ghana, 2018.
[4] National Council for Curriculum and Assessment, Mathematics Common Core Programme Curriculum. Ghana: Ghana Education
Service, 2020.
[5] H. O. Ali, “Factors affecting students’ academic performance in mathematical sciences department in tertiary institutions in
Nigeria,” US-China Education Review, vol. 3, no. 12, pp. 905–913, 2013.
[6] J. Enu, O. K. Agyman, and D. Nkum, “Factors influencing students’ mathematics performance in some selected colleges of
education in Ghana,” International Journal of Education Learning and Development, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 68–74, 2015.
[7] H. Morgan, “Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences Theory and his ideas on promoting creativity,” Celebrating Giants and
Trailblazers: A-Z of Who’s Who in Creativity Research and Related Fields, pp. 124–141, 2021.
[8] Z. K. Mbugua, K. Kibet, G. M. Muthaa, and G. R. Nkonke, “Factors Contributing To Students’ Poor Performance in Mathematics
at Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education in Kenya: A Case of Baringo County, Kenya,” American International Journal of
Contemporary Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 87–91, 2012.
[9] L. W. Roberts, J. D. Edgerton, and T. Peter, “The Importance of Place: Facility Conditions and Learning Outcomes,” Education
Canada, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 48–51, 2006.
[10] A. A. Lipnevich, F. Preckel, and S. Krumm, “Mathematics attitudes and their unique contribution to achievement: Going over and
above cognitive ability and personality,” Learning and Individual Differences, vol. 47, pp. 70–79, 2016, doi:
10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.027.
[11] B. Cowie and E. Khoo, “Accountability through access, authenticity and advocacy when researching with young children,”
International Journal of Inclusive Education, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 234–247, 2017, doi: 10.1080/13603116.2016.1260821.
[12] J. Flutter and J. Rudduck, Consulting Pupils. London: Routledge, 2004.
[13] D. A. Adebowale, “The relationship between changes in attitude towards a course and final achievement,” An International
Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 46, pp. 15–28, 2000.
[14] D. C. Neale, “The role of attitudes in learning mathematics,” The Arithmetic Teacher, vol. 16, no. 8, pp. 631–640, 1969.
[15] C. Dulton, “Coalition for the development of a performance measurement system,” Educational Research, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 11–
17, 2004.
[16] P. Gonzales, T. Williams, L. Jocelyn, S. Roey, D. Kastberg, and S. Brenwald, “Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and
Science Achievement of US Fourth-and Eighth-Grade Students in an International Context,” 2008.
[17] B. M. Ngussa and E. E. Mbuti, “The influence of humour on learners’ attitude and mathematics achievement: A case of secondary
schools in Arusha City, Tanzania,” Journal of Educational Research, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 170–181, 2017.
[18] H. L. Schofield, “Sex, grade level, and the relationship between mathematics attitude and achievement in children,” The Journal
of Educational Research, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 280–284, 1982, doi: 10.1080/00220671.1982.10885395.
[19] R. R. Naungayan, “Attitude towards Mathematics and Mathematics Achievement of Secondary School Learners in Banayoyo-
Lidlidda District,” Puissant, vol. 3, pp. 395–407, 2022.
[20] L. E. Hart, “Describing the affective domain: Saying what we mean,” Affect and mathematical problem solving: A new
perspective, pp. 37–45, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3614-6_3.
[21] A. Sarmah and P. Puri, “Attitude towards mathematics of the students studying in diploma engineering institute (polytechnic) of
Sikkim,” Journal of Research & Method in Education, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 6–10, 2014.
[22] L. C. Howe and J. A. Krosnick, “Attitude Strength,” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 327–351, Jan. 2017, doi:
10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600.
[23] M. Kahveci, “Students’ Perceptions to Use Technology for Learning: Measurement Integrity of the Modified Fennema-Sherman
Attitudes Scales.,” Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 185–201, 2010.
[24] I. Ajzen, “Attitude theory and the attitude-behavior relation,” New Directions in Attitude Measurement, pp. 41–57, 1993.
[25] I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein, “Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research.,” Psychological
Bulletin, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 888–918, Sep. 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888.
[26] P. J. Ehret, B. M. Monroe, and S. J. Read, “Modeling the dynamics of evaluation: A multilevel neural network implementation of
the iterative reprocessing model,” Personality and Social Psychology Review, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 148–176, 2015, doi:
10.1177/1088868314544221.
[27] P. C. Cretchley, “Advancing research into affective factors in mathematics learning: clarifying key factors, terminology and
measurement,” in Proceedings of the 31st annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, 2008,
vol. 1, pp. 147–154.
[28] J. C. Moyer, V. Robison, and J. Cai, “Attitudes of high-school students taught using traditional and reform mathematics curricula
in middle school: a retrospective analysis,” Educational Studies in Mathematics, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 115–134, Jun. 2018, doi:
10.1007/s10649-018-9809-4.
[29] B. Ashby, “Exploring children’s attitudes towards mathematics,” Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning
Mathematics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2009.
[30] S. Y. Lim and E. Chapman, “Development of a short form of the attitudes toward mathematics inventory,” Educational Studies in
Mathematics, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 145–164, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10649-012-9414-x.
[31] P. Kupari and K. Nissinen, “Background factors behind mathematics achievement in Finnish education context: Explanatory
models based on TIMSS 1999 and TIMSS 2011 data,” in IEA CONFERENCE 2013, Proceedings, 2013. [Online]. Available:
https://www.iea.nl/sites/default/files/2019-04/IRC-2013_Kupari_Nissinen.pdf
[32] J. L. Adelson and D. B. McCoach, “Development and Psychometric Properties of the Math and Me Survey,” Measurement and
Evaluation in Counseling and Development, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 225–247, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1177/0748175611418522.
[33] G. M. Guy, J. Cornick, and I. Beckford, “More than math: on the affective domain in developmental mathematics.,” International
Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2015, doi:
https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2015.090207.
[34] A. Bandura and A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Macmillan: Worth Publishers, 1997.
[35] A. J. Elliot, “A conceptual history of the achievement goal construct,” in Handbook of competence and motivation, A. J. Elliot
and C. S. Dweck, Eds. New York: Guilford Publications, 2005, pp. 52–72.
[36] S. Y. Lim and E. Chapman, “Identifying affective domains that correlate and predict mathematics performance in high-
performing students in Singapore,” Educational Psychology, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 747–764, 2015, doi:
10.1080/01443410.2013.860221.
[37] M. D. Goldberg and D. G. Cornell, “The influence of intrinsic motivation and self-concept on academic achievement in second-
and third-grade students,” Journal for the Education of the Gifted, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 179–205, 1998.
[38] A. Cook-Sather, “Student voice across contexts: Fostering student agency in today’s schools,” Theory into practice, vol. 59, no. 2,
pp. 182–191, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1705091.
[39] J. E. Dodgson, “About research: Qualitative methodologies,” Journal of Human Lactation, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 355–358, 2017, doi:
10.1177/0890334417698693.
[40] R. V Krejcie and D. W. Morgan, “Determining sample size for research activities,” Educational and Psychological Measurement,
vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 607–610, 1970.
[41] V. Braun and V. Clarke, “Using thematic analysis in psychology,” Qualitative research in psychology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 77–101,
2006, doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
[42] M. J. Paschal and D. G. Mkulu, “Teacher-students’ relationship and students’ academic performance in public secondary schools
in Magu District, Tanzania,” Journal of Research in Education and Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 20–37, 2020, doi:
10.31730/osf.io/tmh9c.
[43] I. A. Jadoon et al., “Effect of Teacher-Student Relationship on Pro-Social Behavior and Academic Achievement of Secondary
School Students,” Indian Journal of Economics and Business, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 331–337, 2022.
[44] K. De Castella, D. Byrne, and M. Covington, “Unmotivated or motivated to fail? A cross-cultural study of achievement
motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement.,” Journal of educational psychology, vol. 105, no. 3, pp. 861–880, 2013,
doi: 10.1037/a0032464.
[45] L. H. Chen, C.-H. Wu, Y. H. Kee, M.-S. Lin, and S.-H. Shui, “Fear of failure, 2× 2 achievement goal and self-handicapping: An
examination of the hierarchical model of achievement motivation in physical education,” Contemporary Educational Psychology,
vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 298–305, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2009.06.006.
[46] B. Choi, “I’m Afraid of not succeeding in learning: Introducing an instrument to measure higher education students’ fear of
failure in learning,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 2107–2121, 2021, doi: 10.1080/03075079.2020.1712691.
[47] H. Burkhardt and M. Swan, “Designing Assessment of Performance in Mathematics,” Journal of the International Society for
Design and Development in Education, vol. 2, no. May, pp. 1–24, 2008.
[48] N. E. Winstone, R. A. Nash, M. Parker, and J. Rowntree, “Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic
review and a taxonomy of recipience processes,” Educational psychologist, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 17–37, 2017, doi:
10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538.
[49] D. Boud, R. Ajjawi, P. Dawson, and J. Tai, Developing evaluative judgement in higher education: Assessment for knowing and
producing quality work. London: Routledge, 2018.
[50] European Commission, “White paper on the future of Europe,” 2017. https://commission.europa.eu/system/files/2017-
03/white_paper_on_the_future_of_europe_en.pdf
[51] J. Anderson and A. Kriesler, “Making maths matter: Engaging students from low SES schools through social justice contexts,” in
Proceedings of the 42nd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2018, vol. 2, pp.
35–42.
[52] S. Kagan, “Kagan Structures, Processing, and Excellence in College Teaching,” Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, vol.
25, no. 3&4, pp. 119–138, 2014.
[53] K. Fellnhofer and S. Mueller, “‘I want to be like you!’: The influence of role models on entrepreneurial intention,” Journal of
Enterprising Culture, vol. 26, no. 02, pp. 113–153, 2018, doi: 10.1142/S021849581850005X.
[54] B. Matthes and H. Stoeger, “Influence of parents’ implicit theories about ability on parents’ learning-related behaviors, children’s
implicit theories, and children’s academic achievement,” Contemporary Educational Psychology, vol. 54, pp. 271–280, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.07.001.
Positive attitudes toward mathematics among senior high school … (Florence Christianah Awoniyi)
194 ISSN: 2089-9823
BIOGRAPHIES OF AUTHORS