Cambridge International AS & A Level: Economics 9708/42
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Economics 9708/42
Cambridge International AS & A Level: Economics 9708/42
ECONOMICS 9708/42
Paper 4 Data Response and Essays May/June 2023
MARK SCHEME
Maximum Mark: 70
Published
This mark scheme is published as an aid to teachers and candidates, to indicate the requirements of the
examination. It shows the basis on which Examiners were instructed to award marks. It does not indicate the
details of the discussions that took place at an Examiners’ meeting before marking began, which would have
considered the acceptability of alternative answers.
Mark schemes should be read in conjunction with the question paper and the Principal Examiner Report for
Teachers.
Cambridge International will not enter into discussions about these mark schemes.
Cambridge International is publishing the mark schemes for the May/June 2023 series for most
Cambridge IGCSE, Cambridge International A and AS Level and Cambridge Pre-U components, and some
Cambridge O Level components.
These general marking principles must be applied by all examiners when marking candidate answers.
They should be applied alongside the specific content of the mark scheme or generic level descriptors
for a question. Each question paper and mark scheme will also comply with these marking principles.
the specific content of the mark scheme or the generic level descriptors for the question
the specific skills defined in the mark scheme or in the generic level descriptors for the question
the standard of response required by a candidate as exemplified by the standardisation scripts.
Marks awarded are always whole marks (not half marks, or other fractions).
marks are awarded for correct/valid answers, as defined in the mark scheme. However, credit
is given for valid answers which go beyond the scope of the syllabus and mark scheme,
referring to your Team Leader as appropriate
marks are awarded when candidates clearly demonstrate what they know and can do
marks are not deducted for errors
marks are not deducted for omissions
answers should only be judged on the quality of spelling, punctuation and grammar when these
features are specifically assessed by the question as indicated by the mark scheme. The
meaning, however, should be unambiguous.
Rules must be applied consistently, e.g. in situations where candidates have not followed
instructions or in the application of generic level descriptors.
Marks should be awarded using the full range of marks defined in the mark scheme for the question
(however; the use of the full mark range may be limited according to the quality of the candidate
responses seen).
Marks awarded are based solely on the requirements as defined in the mark scheme. Marks should
not be awarded with grade thresholds or grade descriptors in mind.
a DO credit answers which are worded differently from the mark scheme if they clearly
convey the same meaning (unless the mark scheme requires a specific term)
b DO credit alternative answers/examples which are not written in the mark scheme if they
are correct
c DO credit answers where candidates give more than one correct answer in one
prompt/numbered/scaffolded space where extended writing is required rather than list-type
answers. For example, questions that require n reasons (e.g. State two reasons …).
d DO NOT credit answers simply for using a ‘key term’ unless that is all that is required.
(Check for evidence it is understood and not used wrongly.)
e DO NOT credit answers which are obviously self-contradicting or trying to cover all
possibilities
f DO NOT give further credit for what is effectively repetition of a correct point already
credited unless the language itself is being tested. This applies equally to ‘mirror
statements’ (i.e. polluted/not polluted).
g DO NOT require spellings to be correct, unless this is part of the test. However spellings of
syllabus terms must allow for clear and unambiguous separation from other syllabus terms
with which they may be confused (e.g. Corrasion/Corrosion)
3 Calculation questions:
The mark scheme will show the steps in the most likely correct method(s), the mark for
each step, the correct answer(s) and the mark for each answer
If working/explanation is considered essential for full credit, this will be indicated in the
question paper and in the mark scheme. In all other instances, the correct answer to a
calculation should be given full credit, even if no supporting working is shown.
Where the candidate uses a valid method which is not covered by the mark scheme,
award equivalent marks for reaching equivalent stages.
Where an answer makes use of a candidate’s own incorrect figure from previous working,
the ‘own figure rule’ applies: full marks will be given if a correct and complete method is
used. Further guidance will be included in the mark scheme where necessary and any
exceptions to this general principle will be noted.
4 Annotation:
For point marking, ticks can be used to indicate correct answers and crosses can be used
to indicate wrong answers. There is no direct relationship between ticks and marks. Ticks
have no defined meaning for levels of response marking.
For levels of response marking, the level awarded should be annotated on the script.
Other annotations will be used by examiners as agreed during standardisation, and the
meaning will be understood by all examiners who marked that paper.
Assessment objectives
AO2 Analysis
Examine economic issues and relationships, using relevant economic concepts, theories and
information.
Select, interpret and organise economic information in written, numerical and diagrammatic form.
Use economic information to recognise patterns, relationships, causes and effects.
Explain the impacts and consequences of changes in economic variables.
AO3 Evaluation
Recognise assumptions and limitations of economic information and models.
Assess economic information and the strengths and weaknesses of arguments.
Recognise that some economic decisions involve consideration of factors such as priorities and
value judgements.
Communicate reasoned judgements, conclusions and decisions, based on the arguments.
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response for AO1 Knowledge and understanding and
AO2 Analysis for Questions 2, 3, 4 and 5.
The response addresses the general theme of the question and the
relevant economic issues, with limited development.
1 A small number of relevant knowledge points are included and the 1–5
response is limited by significant errors or omissions.
0 No creditable response. 0
Use this table to give marks for each candidate response for AO3 Evaluation for Questions 2, 3, 4
and 5.
0 No creditable response. 0
Follow the point-based marking guidance at the top of this mark scheme.
1(b) Explain, with the help of a diagram, the likely impact of the BRI on both 4
the potential economic growth and the actual economic growth of
Pakistan.
Consumption PPC2
goods PPC1 PPC = Production possibility curve
Capital goods
Accurately drawn and labelled graph (1)
showing showing/referring to both movement from x to y for actual
economic growth and PPC1 to PPC2 for potential economic growth (2)
1(c) Consider, with reference to Table 1.1, the change in the standard of 6
living in Pakistan and China between 2014 and 2018.
1(d) Evaluate, using the article, the likely impact of the BRI on the economies 8
of Pakistan and China in the long run.
Advantages
China
More exports of capital equipment rail equipment, cement and steel.
Cheaper export routes to middle eastern and western market allowing
development of western Chinese provinces.
Use of excess Chinese capacity lowering Chinese cost of production at
home boosting profits.
Market for Chinese bank loans.
Pakistan
Inwards investment on railways/Gwadar port/industrial zones.
Boost AD and AS leadings to higher non-inflationary GDP
Investment in reliable electricity supply with benefits for industry, and
improve consumer standard of living domestic comfort and human capital
through better education.
Disadvantages
Guidance:
MAX 5 marks for advantages. Both China and Pakistan must be
considered.
Max 5 Marks for disadvantages.
Max 5 Marks if only one country considered.
Max 7 marks for 2 sided answers.
Judgement of the impact of BRI on Pakistan and China 1 mark.
EITHER
Evaluate, with the help of diagrams, two policies that a government may
use to encourage the use of EVs.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
2 AO3 Evaluation
AO3 Evaluation 6
OR
3 Evaluate, with the help of a diagram(s) how total market demand and 20
minimum efficient scale may determine the form of market structure in
an industry.
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
MES is not static and may change over time eg technological change.
The definition of the market will affect the calculation of the relationship.
The village shop which operates at a small scale is appropriate for the
village market.
Markets will still exist where particular firms produce small scale high-
cost items e.g. luxury cars or designer clothes to satisfy a niche portion of
a bigger market.
AO3 Evaluation 6
EITHER
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
The ability of supply capacity in the low-income country to react to the
effect of the depreciation.
The nature of many developing countries exports of agricultural
commodities being price inelastic in supply compared with oil exports.
The short run effects on employment (positive) and inflation (negative)
Beneficial effect on ability to service international debt positive if
denominated in domestic currency but negative if borrowings are in a
foreign currency.
AO3 Evaluation 6
OR
Use Table A: AO1 Knowledge and understanding and AO2 Analysis and
Table B: AO3 Evaluation to mark candidate responses to this question.
Indicative content
AO3 Evaluation
Evaluation may be concerned with either the analysis used to reduce
inflation or the ability to meet all the macroeconomic aims.
An initial analysis of the monetary policy to reducing the level of inflation
which may be in terms of how accurate the central bank is in determining
the increase in the rate of interest/reserve asset ratio required or
reduction in the money supply.
The time lags between policy implementation and outcome may also be
discussed.
Expectations and the role they play in determining policy outcomes.
The model(s) employed will show either the effect of the policy on the
alternative aims and requires an explicit comment on whether this
enables the alternative to be achieved or not.
Two examples of a contradiction in the simultaneous achievement of the
aims need to be shown and commented upon.
The short and long run implications of inflation reduction on achieving the
alternative aims might be evaluated.
The Phillips curve relationship may be criticised from the “rational
expectations” viewpoint.
5 The short run and long run effects of the chosen inflation policy can be
compared in terms of actual and potential reduction/increase in economic
growth.
The relationship between the rate of inflation, the exchange rate and the
balance of payments including the Marshall-Lerner effect.
AO3 Evaluation 6