0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views8 pages

Polar

The document discusses integration of radial functions in N-dimensional space. It proves that the integral of a radial function f(r) over a spherically symmetric region is equal to the (N-1)-dimensional surface measure of the unit sphere, αN, multiplied by the integral of f(r) with respect to r. It also determines the volume of the N-dimensional unit ball, ωN. As an example, it uses this to compute the Gaussian integral in N-dimensional space.

Uploaded by

Murali K
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views8 pages

Polar

The document discusses integration of radial functions in N-dimensional space. It proves that the integral of a radial function f(r) over a spherically symmetric region is equal to the (N-1)-dimensional surface measure of the unit sphere, αN, multiplied by the integral of f(r) with respect to r. It also determines the volume of the N-dimensional unit ball, ωN. As an example, it uses this to compute the Gaussian integral in N-dimensional space.

Uploaded by

Murali K
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Integration and Polar Coordinates

S. Kesavan
The Institute of Mathematical Sciences,
CIT Campus, Taramani,
Chennai - 600 113.

email: [email protected]

Abstract: A simple proof of the formula for the integration of radial func-
tions on RN , N ≥ 2, is given. As an application, the volume of the N -
dimensional unit ball is computed.

1
1 Introduction
The method of substitution, also known as change of variables, is a useful tool
in integration. One of the high points in a course on multivariate calculus is
the change of variable formula which states that if f = (f1 , f2 , · · · , fN ) : E ⊂
RN → RN is a bijection which is smooth both ways, and if g is an integrable
function on f (E), then
Z Z
g(x) dx = g(f (x))|det(f 0 (x))| dx
f (E) E

where x = (x1 , x2 , · · · , xN ), f 0 (x) is the Jacobian matrix at x whose ij-th


entry is given by
∂fi
(x)
∂xj
and dx indicates that we are performing an N -dimensional volume integra-
tion, i.e., we have an N -fold integral with respect to dx1 dx2 · · · dxN .
The most familiar application of this is the case of polar coordinates in
the plane given by x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ and the integral
Z Z
g(x, y) dxdy

transforms as Z Z
ge(r, θ) rdrdθ

with appropriate limits of integration (here g(x, y) = ge(r, θ)). Similarly, in


R3 , we have the spherical polar coordinates x = r sin θ cos ϕ, y = r sin θ sin ϕ, z =
r cos θ and the integral
Z Z Z
g(x, y, z) dxdydz

transforms as Z Z Z
ge(r, θ, ϕ) r2 sin θdrdθdϕ,

again, with appropriate limits of integration, where g(x, y, z) = ge(r, θ, ϕ).


Polar coordinates are particularly useful when the function to be inte-
grated is a radial function, i.e. it depends only on
N
! 21
X
r = |x| = x2i .
i=1

2
In such a case, the integral reduces to one involving just a single variable.
For instance, if we are integrating over the entire space, the integral reduces
to Z ∞
2π ge(r)r dr
0
when N = 2 and to Z ∞
4π ge(r)r2 dr
0
when N = 3. The most familiar example of this is the evaluation of the
Gaussian integral, ubiquitous in probability theory,
Z ∞
2
e−x dx.
−∞

If we set this as I, then,


Z ∞Z ∞ Z ∞
−(x2 +y 2 ) 2
2
I = e dxdy = 2π e−r r dr
−∞ −∞ 0

which yields I = π.
When the dimension exceeds three, it is difficult to explicitly write down
the spherical coordinates and even if we succeed, the ensuing calculations in-
volving the N -dimensional Jacobian will certainly be horrendous. We would
like to have a simple formula, at least for the integration of radial functions,
and this is what we will set out to establish in this article.
Looking at the cases N = 2 and N = 3, we observe that 2πr is the
perimeter of the circle of radius r and 4πr2 is the surface area of the sphere
of radius r in these respective dimensions and so we are tempted to conjecture
that the integral of a radial function would transform as the integral with
respect to r after multiplication by the (N − 1)-dimensional surface measure
of the sphere of radius r in RN . Is this correct, and, if so, what is the surface
measure of the sphere in RN ?
Let us denote by ωN the volume of the unit ball in RN and by αN ,
the (N − 1)-dimensional surface measure of the unit sphere. The change of
variables x 7→ x/R maps the ball of radius R onto the unit ball and the
Jacobian turns out to be a scalar matrix and so we easily conclude that the
volume of the ball of radius R is ωN RN from the change of variable formula
mentioned at the beginning. What about the surface measure of the sphere
of radius R? For this we have a very nice application of Gauss’ divergence

3
theorem: if Ω ⊂ RN is a domain, ∂Ω its boundary on which we have a well-
defined outward unit normal ν, then for a smooth vector valued function
v : Ω → RN , we have
Z Z
div(v(x)) dx = v(x).ν(x) dS(x)
Ω ∂Ω

where the ‘dot’ denotes the usual scalar product in RN and dS(x) indicates
that we are performing a surface integral with respect to the appropriate
induced surface measure.
Setting v(x) = x, we get div(v(x)) = N and so the left-hand side just
gives N times the volume of the domain. If Ω is the ball of radius R, then
it is N ωN RN . The unit outer normal at a point x on the boundary ∂Ω of
the ball Ω of radius R and centre at the origin is just x/R and so v(x).ν(x)
reduces to R and so the right-hand side is just R times the surface measure
of ∂Ω. Hence we conclude that the surface measure of the sphere of radius
R is N ωN RN −1 , which when R = 1 yields

αN = N ω N

.
In the sequel, we will prove that the integral of a radial function f (x) =
f (r) over a region which is spherically symmetric about the origin is indeed
e
given by Z Z
−1
N ωN fe(r)r N
dr = αN fe(r)rN −1 dr

with appropriate limits of integration. We will also determine ωN .

2 Integration of radial functions


Let Ω be the ball of radius R > 0 with centre at the origin. Consider a
continuous real valued function, f , on the closed ball which is radial, i.e.
f (x) = fe(|x|) where fe : [0, R] → R is a continuous function. Consider a
partition
P : 0 = r0 < r1 < r2 < · · · < rn = R
of the interval [0, R]. Let Ωi , 1 ≤ i ≤ n, denote the annular region

{x ∈ RN | ri−1 ≤ |x| < ri }

4
so that Ω = ∪ni=1 Ωi . By the mean value theorem, there exists ξi ∈ (ri−1 , ri )
such that
riN − ri−1
N
= N ξiN −1 (ri − ri−1 ).
Choose yi ∈ Ωi such that |yi | = ξi . Define

fP (x) = f (yi ), x ∈ Ωi , 1 ≤ i ≤ n.

Let
µ(P) = max (ri − ri−1 ).
1≤i≤n

If x ∈ Ωi , then

|f (x) − fP (x)| = |fe(|x|) − fe(|yi |)| = |fe(|x|) − fe(ξi )|.

Since fe is uniformly continious, given ε > 0, there exists δ > 0 such that, for
all x ∈ Ω, we have
|f (x) − fP (x)| < ε
for all partitions P such that µ(P) < δ. Thus, fP converges uniformly to f
as µ(P) → 0. Consequently,
Z Z
fP (x) dx → f (x) dx
Ω Ω

as µ(P) → 0. But since fP is constant in each subdomain Ωi and since the


N
volume of Ωi is given by ωN (riN − ri−1 ), we get
Z n
X n
X
fP (x) dx = fe(ξi )ωN (riN − ri−1
N
) = fe(ξi )ωN N ξiN −1 (ri − ri−1 )
Ω i=1 i=1

and the last term converges, as µ(P) → 0, to


Z R
N ωN fe(r)rN −1 dr.
0

Thus, we have shown that if f is a continuous and radial function (i.e.


f (x) = fe(|x|)) on the closed ball of radius R, centered at the origin, then
Z Z R
f (x) dx = N ωN fe(r)rN −1 dr.
Ω 0

5
By passing to the limit as R → ∞, it is now a simple exercise to see that if
f is a continuous and improperly Riemann integrable function on RN which
is radial, then
Z Z ∞
f (x) dx = N ωN fe(r)rN −1 dr.
RN 0

3 Volume of the unit ball


Let us now apply the preceding result to the function
PN
x2i 2
f (x) = e− i=1 = e−r .

On one hand (see Section 1),


Z Z ∞
2 N
N
f (x) dx = Πi=1 e−xi dxi = π 2 .
RN −∞

On the other hand, using polar coordinates,


Z Z ∞
2
f (x) dx = N ωN e−r rN −1 dr.
RN 0

Setting r2 = s, we get
Z ∞
1 ∞ −s N −1
Z  
−r2 N −1 1 N
e r dr = e s 2 ds = Γ
0 2 0 2 2

where Γ denotes the usual Gamma function defined by


Z ∞
Γ(t) = e−s st−1 ds, t > 0.
0

By a simple integration by parts, we see that

Γ(t + 1) = tΓ(t), t > 0 (1)

and so we deduce from the above computations that


N N
π2 π2
ωN = N N = .
2
Γ( 2 ) Γ( N2 + 1)

6
When t = 1/2, the integral defining the Gamma function reduces to the
Gaussian integral mentioned at the beginning of this article and we have

 
1
Γ = π.
2

By repeated use of (1) we see that for any positive integer n, Γ(n + 1) = n!.
Thus we can compute Γ( N2 + 1) by appealing to these facts and repeatedly
using (1).

Examples
π
ω2 = = π.
Γ(2)
3
π2
ω3 = 3 .
Γ( 2 + 1)
Now,
3√
     
3 3 3 31 1
Γ +1 = Γ = Γ = π.
2 2 2 22 2 4
Thus,
4
ω3 = π.
3
In the same way we can show that

π2 8π 2
ω4 = , ω5 =
2 15
and so on.

4 Concluding remarks
The integration formula for continuous radial functions that was proved in
this article is a very special case of a deep result in measure theory called
the coarea formula. It states that if u : RN → R is a Lipschitz continuous
function and is such that for almost every r ∈ R, the level set
def
{u = r} = {x ∈ RN | u(x) = r}

7
is a smooth (N − 1)-dimensional hypersurface in RN , and if f : RN → R is
a continuous and integrable function, then
Z Z ∞ Z 
f (x)|Du(x)| dx = f (x) dS(x) dr.
RN −∞ {u=r}

(By another deep theorem of Radamacher, Lipschitz continuous functions


are differentiable almost everywhere and Du denotes the gradient vector of
u.) In particular, choosing u(x) = |x|, we get the polar coordinate formula
Z Z ∞ Z 
f (x) dx = f (x) dS(x) dr.
RN 0 {|x|=r}

If f is radial, then, following our usual notation, the inner integral just
becomes fe(r) times the surface measure of the sphere of radius r which
gives N ωN rN −1 fe(r). For a detailed treatment of the coarea (pronounced
co-area) formula, the reader is referred to the treatise ‘Measure Theory and
Fine Properties of Functions’ by L. C. Evans and R. F. Gariepy (CRC Press,
1992).
Finally, we can also derive a recursive relation for the volume of the unit
ball. Indeed, we can slice up the N -dimensional hemisphere by sections
parallel to the base. Then at height t, 0 < t < 1, we get an √ infinitesimal
‘cylinder’ with ‘base’ an (N − 1)-dimensional ball of radius 1 − t2 and of
‘height’ dt. Thus,
π
Z 1 Z
2
N −1
2
ωN = 2 ωN −1 (1 − t ) 2 dt = 2ωN −1 cosN θ dθ.
0 0

Recall that
N −1 N −3
· · · 12 π2 , if N is even

π
N N −2
Z 
2
cosN θ dθ =
N −1 N −3
0 · · · 23 , if N is odd.

N N −2

The reader is referred to an article by K. B. Athreya (cf. Resonance, April


2008) where this idea is developed and the asymptotic behaviour of ωN , as
N → ∞ is examined.

You might also like