Panels Tata Command
Panels Tata Command
Panels Tata Command
net/publication/326376644
CITATIONS READS
2 65,632
3 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Md. Mahmudul Alam on 20 December 2020.
xtset id year
xtsum y x1 x2 x3 x4
xtunitroot ips x
reg y x1 x2 x3 x4
xtreg y x1 x2 x3 x4, fe
est sto fe
xtreg y x1 x2 x3 x4, re
Now run hausman test to choose suitable model between fixed and random effect
Command for Breusch and Pagan Lagrangian multiplier (LM) test to choose b/w RE model and
POLS
xttest0
After estimating RE, If the probability value <0.05, then RE is better, otherwise POLS model should be
selected
estat hottest
estat ovtest
estat vif
xtserial y x1 x2 x3 x4
xttest3
xtregar y x1 x2 x3 x4 , fe
xtregar y x1 x2 x3 x4, re
xtdolshm y x1 x2 x3 x4 x5
cointreg smd rq bd lep lpvr un ir, est(ccr) vlag(1) kernel(qs) bmeth(andrews) eqtrend(1) nodivn
xtpmg d.y d.x1 d.x2 d.x3, lr(l.y l.x1 l.x2 l.x3) replace mg
est sto mg
Xtpmg d.y d.x1 d.x2 d.x3, lr(l.y l.x1 l.x2 l.x3) replace pmg
The coefficient of the speed of adjustment should be negative, less than one and statistically significant as
a condition for correcting the disequilibrium.
xtpmg d.y d.x1 d.x2 d.x3, lr(l.y l.x1 l.x2 l.x3) replace dfe
xtpmg d.y d.x1 d.x2 d.x3, lr(l.y l.x1 l.x2 l.x3) replace replace full pmg
pescadf x, lags(1)
How to estimate panel unit root test by using CIPS test (2nd generation)
pescadf x, lags(1)
Command for dynamic common correlated effect estimator -pooled mean group
xtdcce2 d.y d.L.y d.x1 d.x2, cr(_all) reportc lr(y x1 x2 ) p(y x1 x2)
xtabond2 y L.y L2.y x1 L.x1 L(0/2).(x2 x3) i.year, gmm(L.y) iv(x1 L.x1 L(0/2).(x2 x3) i.year) nolevel
robust
xtabond2 y L.y L2.y x1 L.x1 L(0/2).(k ys) yr*, gmm(L.(n w k)) iv(L(0/2).ys yr*) nolevel robust small
xtabond2 y L.y L2.y x1 L.x1 L(0/2).(x2 x3) i.year, gmm ( L.(y x1 x2)) iv( L(0/2).x2 i.year) nolevel
robust
xtabond2 y L.y L2.y x1 L.x2 L(0/2).(x2 x3) i.year, gmm(L.y) iv(x1 L.x1 L(0/2).(x2 x3) i.year) nolevel
twostep
Where xtabond2 stands for gmm command, the variables in the first bracket represents endogenous
variables while the second bracket contains instrumental variables of the model.
To run system gmm, we remove “nolevel” in the ‘difference gmm’ command above
xtabond2 y L.y L(0/1).(x1 x2) yr*, gmmstyle(L.(y x1 x2)) ivstyle(yr*, equation(level)) robust
small
xtabond2 y L.y L(0/1).(x1 x2) i.year , gmmstyle(L.(y x1 x2)) ivstyle(i.year, equation(level))
robust small
Two step System GMM:
xtabond2 y L.y L(0/1).(x1 x2) i.year , gmmstyle(L.(y x1 x2)) ivstyle(i.year, equation(level))
twostep small
xtabond2 y L.y L(0/1).(x1 x2) yr1978-yr1984, gmm(L.(y x1 x2), lag(1 1)) iv(yr1978-yr1984,
eq(level)) h(2) robust twostep
Command for checking Endogeneity
The first step is to regress using the following command:
ivregress gmm dv X1 X2 X3 (X4=X5 X6)
Then test for endogeneity as follows:
estat endog
A lower probability value is a sign of the endogeneity problem existing in the model
The next step is to test for validity of the instruments used as follows:
estat overid
A higher probability value of the Sagan/Hansen test signifies model is correctly specified
otherwise instruments are invalid.