This job debriefing form summarizes a casing operation performed on June 27, 2019. A pre-job safety meeting was held and 30 Behavioral Based Safety cards were submitted. The operation involved running 1189 feet of 9 5/8 inch casing with 8 round thread type. There were no injuries, near misses, or problems reported during the job. Some downtime was experienced after making up a landing joint due to observed backflow. Overall the job was completed successfully with no issues reported for the Frank's crew or equipment.
This job debriefing form summarizes a casing operation performed on June 27, 2019. A pre-job safety meeting was held and 30 Behavioral Based Safety cards were submitted. The operation involved running 1189 feet of 9 5/8 inch casing with 8 round thread type. There were no injuries, near misses, or problems reported during the job. Some downtime was experienced after making up a landing joint due to observed backflow. Overall the job was completed successfully with no issues reported for the Frank's crew or equipment.
This job debriefing form summarizes a casing operation performed on June 27, 2019. A pre-job safety meeting was held and 30 Behavioral Based Safety cards were submitted. The operation involved running 1189 feet of 9 5/8 inch casing with 8 round thread type. There were no injuries, near misses, or problems reported during the job. Some downtime was experienced after making up a landing joint due to observed backflow. Overall the job was completed successfully with no issues reported for the Frank's crew or equipment.
This job debriefing form summarizes a casing operation performed on June 27, 2019. A pre-job safety meeting was held and 30 Behavioral Based Safety cards were submitted. The operation involved running 1189 feet of 9 5/8 inch casing with 8 round thread type. There were no injuries, near misses, or problems reported during the job. Some downtime was experienced after making up a landing joint due to observed backflow. Overall the job was completed successfully with no issues reported for the Frank's crew or equipment.
Name of Person Completing This Form / Dept. Sirajuzzman Zulkifli
Total Frank's Personnel on Job 6 Total Short Service Employees on Job 0
1a. Did Frank's participate in a documented pre-job safety meeting? If No, explain þ Yes ¨ No
1b. Were any Behavioral Base Safety (BBS) cards submitted to the client? e.g. STOP þ Yes ¨ No If Yes, how many? 30
2. Did anyone (Frank's or otherwise) suggest an improved way of getting any part of the ¨ Yes þ No job done in a safer manner? If yes, explain
3. Any safety suggestions - provide a brief summary of how Frank's can improve ¨ Yes þ No safety and/or communications on the job? If yes, explain
4. Did Frank's crew have any First Aid Cases, Accidents, or Incidents while on location? If Yes, explain ¨ Yes þ No
5. Were there any near misses on this job involving Frank's crew? If yes,explain ¨ Yes þ No
6. Did Frank's have equipment on this job that was dressed wrong? If yes, explain ¨ Yes þ No
7a. Were there any delays (NPT) caused by Frank's during rig up or down? ¨ Yes þ No If yes, give total Hrs 0 Min 0
7b. Were there any delays (NPT) caused by others during rig up or down? ¨ Yes þ No If yes, give total Hrs 0 Min 0
7c. Explain delays /downtime
8a. Were there any delays (NPT) caused by Frank's during pipe running operation? ¨ Yes þ No If yes, give total Hrs Min 8b. Were there any delays (NPT) caused by others during pipe running operation? ¨ Yes þ No If yes, give total Hrs Min 8c. Explain delays / downtime
8d. Were there any problems with equipment provided by Frank's during the job? ¨ Yes þ No If yes, what type of equipment? If yes, was an EFR generated? No ¨ Yes þ No
9. Did Frank's fail to send any equipment to this rig that was ordered by the customer? If yes,explain ¨ Yes þ No
10. Any information needs to be passed on to the next Frank's crew going to this rig? If yes, explain ¨ Yes þ No
11. Were there any problems with any Frank's crew member on this job? If yes, explain ¨ Yes þ No OPS-QR-032 (Rev. N) Ref: OPS-P-4.5.2.4 Page: 2
Time Breakdown: Pipe Breakdown:
Action Time Date Size Thread Type Total Ft. String 1 9 5/8 8 Round 1189 6/29/2019 12:00:00AM
Date Began Rig-Up Date Completed Rig-Up Delay Hr Min Cause
29-Jun-19 15:00 29-Jun-19 15:15
Running Operations
Date Ran Float collar Date Ran 1st Joint aft FC Date Ran LastJoint b4 Hanger Date Ran Hanger Run/Pull/Rack-Back Delay Hr Min Delay Cause 29-Jun-19 18:25 30-Jun-19 08:25 29-Jun-19 18:50 29-Jun-19 18:45 Pull 3 55 After making up the landing joint into the running tool & perform overpull, observe backflow.
Rig-Down Operations
Date Began Rig-Down Date Completed Rig-Down Delay Hr Min Cause
Put check in box of all equipment provided by Frank's on this job. If equipment was provided by someone other than Frank's, check oher and indicate service provider. If you experienced any problems with equipment please ensure you complete an Equipment Fault Report (EFR) form Service: Service Provider: Casing Job Type: Completion Job Type: þ Casing Tools / Crew þ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ Conductor ¨ Lower Completion/Screen ¨ Fill-up Tool / Crew ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ Surface ¨ Isolation ¨ Laydown Machine ¨ Frank's ¨ Other þ Intermediate ¨ Completion Tubing
¨ Computer Monitoring ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ Tie Back String Control Lines #
¨ Hydraulic Stabber ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ Liner ¨ Completion Riser ¨ Stab-Rite ¨ Praying Mantis Umbilical Dia. ¨ Hammer / Crew ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ Work String ¨ Horseshoe Elevator Only ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ Collar Load Support(CLS) ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ CRT Equipment ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ Frank's FA-1 ¨ Frank's FX-350 ¨Super TAWG ¨ TAWG ¨ NOV CRT 350 ¨ Downhole Tools ¨ Frank's ¨ Other ¨ CBI Tools ¨ EZ Tripper ¨ HI Tool ¨ DSTR
Question 1 : Was he able to identify hazards and controls for each job step? Question 2 : Did he verify that equipment was fit for use? Question 3 : Was he able to rig-up / function test equipment according to operating procedures? Question 4 : Was he able to carry out work as instructed? Question 5 : Did he operate the equipment competently? Question 6 : Did he keep equipment in good working condition? Question 7 : Did he follow safe work practices? Question 8 : Was he able to explain the use of Stop Work Authority? Question 9 : Rate his knowledge of the tool / equipment operated?
Behavior / Performance Ratings
1 - Unacceptable. 2 - Shows some significant weakness. 3 - Shows some minor weakness. 4 - Meets the requirement of the job. 5 - Exceeds the requirement of the job
Crew Name Primary Position is SSE Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9
Abdul Rahman Bin Muhammad
Tong Adam Operator No 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Jefry Anak Gelanying Casing Field Supervisor/Pusher No 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 4 Mohammad Hazman Bin Haji Hussin Casing Field Supervisor/Pusher No 3 4 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 Muhammad Najidi Hamizan Bin Technician CAM Mohd Jidi No 3 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 Robin Anak Janting Tong Operator No 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 Sirajuzzman Zulkifli CAM Technician No 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Were there any delays (NPT) caused by Frank's? ¨ Yes þ No
If yes, give total Hrs 0 Min 0
NPT Detail:
How would you rate each Frank's service that applies to this job? CATEGORY
EXCELLENT 5 VERY GOOD 4 SATISFACTORY 3 FAIR 2 CATEGORY
Did our personnel perform the job to your satisfaction? 4
Did our equipment perform the job to your satisfaction? 4 Did we participate in your safety observation program to your satisfaction? 4 Did we perform in a safe & careful manner? 4 Did we perform the job in an environmentally sound manner? 4 Was the job performed within the allocated time? 4 Did our service provide value to your operation? 4
General Comments :
Frank's values your opinion, if you have a suggestion as to how we can better serve your needs, we'd like to hear from you. Please check (tick) the box below this statement and you will be contacted by a management representative from the nearest Frank's office.
¨ Would Like to be Contacted
Company Representative Sami Lababidi Date 1-Jul-19
