Cinema 107 Paper 1 Handout Fall 2018 107951
Cinema 107 Paper 1 Handout Fall 2018 107951
Cinema 107 Paper 1 Handout Fall 2018 107951
SECTION 10795
Fall 2018
Professor: Ken Windrum
Due in class on October 17th (hard copy) and through Vericite (on
Canvas) by midnight of the night before—i.e. October 16th. You will
have an 8-hour grace period. All papers received through Vericite
after 8:00 AM on October 17 will be marked down one grade and
considered as late.
Canvas will submit the paper through Vericite to check for plagiarism.
You are agreeing to this by submitting the paper through Canvas.
Make sure your name and the class (Cinema 107) and Section (10795)
AND a TITLE are on both versions of your paper.
You are to take ONE aspect of a film’s narrative and ONE aspect of
its mise-en-scene and discuss how this aspect creates meaning in the
film. Do NOT discuss its ENTIRE Narrative or ENTIRE use of Mise-en-
Scene. Instead talk about something specific such as Restricted
Narration or Non-Linear Temporality in Narrative OR sets,
costumes/makeup, lighting, or acting in Mise-en-Scene.
Use several specific examples from the film to support your analysis.
Grammar, spelling and style are considered while grading. Read your
paper out loud to yourself or others. This is an amazingly effective
way of removing obviously wrong and embarrassing stylistic choices.
My main interest is that you provide a coherent argument and not just
a list. I also am impressed by creativity and original insight.
Less is More! Take a small topic and do it justice! Entire books have
been written about some of these films. You are only writing 3-4
pages.
You don’t need to cite or quote but if you do, you must provide a
citation saying what you’re quoting so any reader could look it up.
Rubric:
9 1/2-10 Points: Clear, Well-written (near-perfect style grammar),
coherent argument with some original ideas.
9 Points: Does the job as well as a 9 ½-10 point paper but with less
original insight.
8 ½ Points: Has a problem with either clarity, style, or a coherent
argument.
8 Points: Has problems with 2 of these areas (clarity, style, coherent
argument)
7-7 ½ Points: Has major problems in all 3 areas but is still tackling
the question at hand.
6-6 ½ Points: Your intention is unclear and confusingly expressed yet
you are discussing a film and attempting to make some analysis.
Less than 6 Points—You are writing a completely different paper than
requested.