Introduction
Introduction
SEMINAR
of the degree of
Master in Urban system
By
JASIM QAMAR
22M0266
Under the supervision of
Prof. Arnab Jana
April 2023
Declaration
I declare that this written submission represents my ideas in my own words and where
other’s ideas or words have been included, I have adequately cited and referenced the
sources. I also declare that I have adhered to all principles of academic honesty and
integrity and have not misrepresented or fabricated or falsified any ideas, data, facts, or
sources in my submission. I understand that any violation of the above will cause
disciplinary action by the institute and evoke penal action from the sources which have
thus not been properly cited or from whom proper permission has not been taken when
needed.
Date: 28.04.2023
Place: Mumbai
Chapter 5. Algorithm.................................................................. 22
5.1. Algebra ...................................................................................................................... 22
5.2. Transformation .......................................................................................................... 23
5.3. Classification ............................................................................................................. 26
5.4. Object based Image analysis ..................................................................................... 27
RS Remote sensing
TM Thematic Mapper
GS Gramm-Schmidt
EM Expectation-Maximization method
The world population has rapidly increased from 244 million in 1900 to 7 billion in 2011 and
is expected to exceed 9.3 billion by 2050 (WUP2011_Report, n.d.). In the last few decades,
urban areas have grown worldwide. One of the most obvious causes of this growth is the
increase in the population. Therefore, environmental concerns associated with urban growth
must be analyzed and monitored carefully, in order to effectively manage land use. Also, the
influences exerted by urban growth may give rise to varying consequences in the different
dimensions (e.g., physical and socioeconomic) of cities (Y. Chen et al., 2017).
Having accurate and up-to-date information on land cover change is essential for
comprehending both human influences and the environmental effects of such changes, which
can then help with managing natural resources (Afifi & Darwish, 2018). An adequate amount
of data about the Earth's surface is required to analyze and monitor land cover changes.
Remote sensing (RS) is the most common method used for this purpose. Land use/land cover
(LULC) data from remote sensing are excellent sources of updated information, allowing fast,
accurate, and efficient analysis, modeling, and interpretation (Araya & Cabral, 2010).
LULC changes are best determined at different scales using geospatial technology, based on
satellite remote sensing data (RS) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Understanding
and predicting LULC changes depend on tracking and analyzing their spatial patterns (F.
Ahmad et al., 2017).
Since the 1970s, remote sensing data have been routinely used to detect changes in land cover
and use. According to the level of image processing used, change detection approaches can be
divided into three categories: pixel-level, feature-level, and object-level. For detecting
changes in multi-temporal imaging, pixel-level change detection analyses data pixel by pixel.
However, using a user-defined heterogeneity criterion, object-based image analysis (OBIA)
separates the image into meaningful segments (groups of pixels) known as object primitives.
Before classifying the images, segmentation is required. Additionally, a single land cover
class is allocated to each segment. These segments were produced based on spectral
characteristics as well as geographical and contextual information, such as shape, texture, etc.
The classifier can distinguish between spectrally similar but spatially dissimilar land cover
classes thanks to this spatial information. As a result, the user can recognize things made up
of pixels with a variety of characteristics. It allows the creation of classes and thematic maps
with strong connections to the real world (Bhatt et al., 2018).
Characterizing and tracking urban land change has undergone a radical transformation thanks
to remote sensing. Previously solely accessible through ground surveys and conventional
mapping methods, data and information about changes in urban land structure, shape, and
extent are now routinely gathered and produced using a constellation of government and
commercial airborne and satellite sensors. Remote sensing has revolutionized urban land
change measurement, but it is equally obvious that the most effective change detection
technique is still up for debate. Numerous techniques are in use now, and many more are
created every day. This multiplicity is required because the methodologies must be
compatible with the urban contexts under consideration and the kinds of urban land
transformations taking place. However, it might be challenging for user communities to sort
through the extensive research on urban land change detection methods (Reba & Seto, 2020).
There isn't a complete overview of urban domains that enables researchers to assess and select
the most appropriate methodologies for their topic, understand potential overlaps and
synergies, or apply findings from one discipline to another. In addition, there is no description
of the kinds of spatial data utilized for urban algorithm analyses or the procedures for
selecting parameters (Casali et al., 2022).
The demand for precise and timely information on land use changes, particularly in
metropolitan areas, is increasing as urbanisation proceeds. By comparing various data sets
(such as satellite photos) acquired at various dates to identify changes in the land cover and
land use, change detection algorithms can provide such information.
1.1. Aim
The study will focus on to evaluate the effectiveness of different change detection techniques
in detecting urban expansion.
1.2. Objectives
Following the introduction, Chapter-2 presents concepts for understanding Urban expansion
through the lens of Remote sensing, and Chapter-3 specifies the methodological framework of
conducting the literature study. Subsequently, Chapter-4 presents different data sources
available in the literature for RM and Chapter-5 summarizes different remote sensing
algorithms that are used in urban change detection. Following that, Chapter-6 presents an
Indian case study that detects changes in highly urbanized areas using satellite imagery over
time and Chapter-7 presents an analysis of the literature. Finally, Chapter-8 discusses the
findings and presents a road map for choosing the best possible algorithm and also discusses the
way forward for my MTP(Master’s Thesis Project) in Urban risk assessment.
Chapter 2. Urban expansion conceptualization using
remote sensing
The algorithms we use to assess and track urban land change directly depend on how we
conceptualize urban land cover change. Here, we give a succinct summary of some of the
important conceptualizations in the literature as well as the several forms of urban land
change that have been quantified.
Accurate links between land change science and economic and social impacts can be created
with an in-depth understanding of the subtle changes in urban land cover over time (Pandey et
al., 2018).
The kinds of changes that will be monitored can be used to group urban land change detection
techniques. Some changes to land cover are categorical in character, i.e., they represent
significant shifts between different land use or cover categories. Other modifications,
including adjustments to usage, density, or intensity, indicate more subtle alterations within
categories. Measuring the extent of change in these circumstances is crucial. It is crucial to
distinguish between assessing categorical change and the size of changes within land cover
classes since the most suitable techniques and chances of success differ. It is often simpler to
assess categorical changes, such as the transition from farmland to urbanism, than more subtle
longitudinal changes, such as the shift from low-intensity to high-intensity urban land.
Although methods for identifying and monitoring urban land change are the main subject of
this study, our capacity to map urban land change has evolved as a result of the expanding
global urban land product inventory for one time period. Urban land change study at scale is
possible because to initiatives like the Global Urban Footprint (GUF), Global Rural-Urban
Mapping Project (GRUMP), GlobalLand30, and the Global Human Settlements Layer
(GHSL), which were developed by many research organisations worldwide. We now have
several time slices of global urban products from GHSL and GUF that can greatly help urban
land change at regional and global scales, even if these goods are not accessible for regular
time intervals. These products have significantly improved in resolution and accuracy
compared to older global products, such as the MODIS 500 m resolution global urban
product, which may be used to study at-scale urban land change. These global products are
helpful for analysis at the global and regional levels, but less for tracking localized land use
changes. Products at the global level typically lack the precision required to quantify land
cover characteristics locally because they try to encompass a wide range of urban land change
scenarios.
Early remote sensing analyses were command-line driven. This amount of coding was
necessary to perform the analysis. Graphical user interfaces (GUIs), with their user-friendly
dropdown menus and minimal coding requirements, such as ENVI, IDRISI, and ERDAS
Imagine, arose as both the size of the user community and software development increased.
Online systems combine these two strategies in certain ways.
For instance, the increasingly popular Google Earth Engine platform has fundamentally
changed how we track and describe the urban land transformation in three crucial ways:
Access to a multi-petabyte collection of satellite images; the ability to analyze sizable
geospatial datasets utilizing cloud computing; and the integration of various forms of
remotely sensed imagery and geospatial datasets from public and private sources are all
provided by this company. Google Earth Engine may be used with only rudimentary Python
or JavaScript skills.
As a result, a wide spectrum of users, even individuals with little technical know-how or no
prior expertise with high-performance computing, can utilise the platform. Many of the
processing chains are not open access with inspectable and alterable code, and have been
criticised for their "black box" character, even if users are obliged to build and submit their
own scripts.
2.3.4. Indices
There are various indices that can be used to measure urban land change, such as the
Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Normalized Difference Built-up Index
(NDBI), and the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI). These indices are based on the
spectral characteristics of different land cover types and can be used to differentiate between
urban areas and other land cover types.
NDVI, for example, is a measure of vegetation cover and can be used to detect changes in
urban green spaces. NDBI, on the other hand, measures the presence of built-up areas, such as
roads, buildings, and other infrastructure. NDWI measures the presence of water bodies,
which can also be used to detect changes in urban land cover. Using these indices, urban land
change can be monitored and quantified over time.
This information can be used to develop strategies for sustainable urban development, such as
identifying areas that require conservation or redevelopment. Overall, remote sensing using
indices provides a powerful tool for measuring urban land change and monitoring the impacts
of urbanization on the environment.
Several research (Bhatt et al., 2018; X. L. Chen et al., 2006) has examined the surface
temperature obtained from the thermal infrared band after extracting land use/cover
information from remote sensing pictures of various time periods using these various urban
indices (NDVI, NDWI, MSAVI2, MNDWI, and NDBI)
This Chapter discusses the importance of conceptualizing urban land cover change and using
a range of data sources and techniques to capture both unidirectional and multidirectional
changes in land cover over time. It also emphasizes the need to distinguish between assessing
categorical change and the size of changes within land cover classes, as well as the
innovations altering remote sensing of urban expansion, including global scale products,
online platforms, and modern data science tendencies.
Chapter 3. Methodology
This section describes the process and methods that have been followed in this literature
study. Methodologically, the study process falls into the conventional three steps of a
literature review process: i) planning the review by developing eligibility criteria; (ii)
identifying relevant literature through a database search, screening and selection; (iii)
conducting the review and analyzing it.
• Papers mainly used change detection algorithms to detect urban land use/land cover
change. The study included supervised, unsupervised algorithm and object-based
image analysis methods.
• Papers with a focus on urban scales ranging from counties to neighbourhoods.
• Papers used geospatial datasets, i.e., data series, vector, or raster datasets when they
are analyzed in conjunction with a geographical location stored by coordinates or by
indexes. For example, the study included papers that used satellite images in
combination with feature datasets as references for land use and land cover.
• The study didn't include publications concerned with remote sensing, the identification
of geographical features and objects in remote sensing photos, image processing,
image classification, computer vision, or photographs of city streets.
• Papers are published in journals or peer-reviewed conferences and written in English.
The phrases "urban areas”, “cities" and "urban environment" are frequently used
interchangeably in literature. Therefore, the study included each term in the search. Moreover,
it also included the keywords ‘Urban expansion’, ‘land use change’ to aim for papers with a
spatial analytical component. As a result, the study used as keywords "urban remote sensing",
"Land expansion algorithm,", "Urban change detection algorithm" for the database search.
(Search string: "urban" AND "remote sensing" AND "change detection" AND "algorithm")
The research papers selected were highly cited according to ScienceDirect statistics to ensure
inclusion of publications with high impact. Also the study focuses research papers from 2000
to 2022 to ensure that the most recent trends and developments are covered. I collected this
set of papers on March 2023.
3.3. Metrics
Following the selection of the research papers based on the qualifying requirements, a review
of the existing literature is conducted. The key information selected in the papers are: title,
authors, year of publication, objective of the study, location of the study, methodology, data
reported, imagery type, algorithm, and accuracy assessment. The study examined each
publication to gather the data, which was then organized in a tabular format for mapping of
themes and methodologies. If a paper did not provide any information about a specific detail,
it is reported as missing.
Title Author DOI Year Location(Geography) Objective Imagery type Algorithm Accuracy
To analyze land-use
changes of Dalian City in
Analysis of the expansion of the built-up Chang Li-ping https://doi.org/10.100 Liaoning Province of China multi-temporal TM images in
2002 Dalian City, China
area of Dalian city Zhang Shu-wen 7/s11769-002-0045-5 over ten years by means of 1986, 1996 and 2000
the correlation analysis
method.
3.4. Geography
All of the cities stated in the original study were included in the analysis to assess the
geographic scope of the research. For each individual case study, the country is counted even
if a study covers many study cities in a single nation. Similar to this, if a research takes cities
from several nations into account, each nation is considered separately. Because many studies
incorporate numerous places, there are more geographic locations in the assessment than there
are individual publications.
This chapter explains the methodology used in the literature review, including the criteria for
selecting relevant research papers, the database search and screening process, metrics used to
analyze the papers, and the geographic scope of the study.
Chapter 4. Data
4.1. Remote sensing imagery classification
Landsat-5 TM (Thematic Mapper) and Landsat-7 ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus)
sensors are commonly used for change detection studies due to their ability to capture
multispectral data at a moderate spatial resolution of 30 meters (USGS Website). Almost all
studies (Afifi & Darwish, 2018; Agapiou et al., 2015; F. Ahmad et al., 2017; S. Ahmad et al.,
2016; Alqurashi et al., 2016; DENG et al., 2009) use Landsat TM (Thematic Mapper) and
ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus) bands for change detection in urban areas. Both
sensors have seven spectral bands, and each band has a specific wavelength range that
corresponds to different surface features and materials.
For urban change detection, the visible and near-infrared bands (bands 1-4) are particularly
useful for detecting changes in vegetation cover, while the mid-infrared and thermal bands
(bands 5-7) can help to identify changes in land use, surface temperature, and moisture.
Here is a summary of how the Landsat TM and ETM+ bands can be used for urban change
detection:
• Band 1 (0.45-0.52 μm): This band can be used to distinguish between built-up areas,
vegetation, and water bodies.
• Band 2 (0.52-0.60 μm): This band is useful for detecting vegetation cover and changes
in vegetation density.
• Band 3 (0.63-0.69 μm): This band can help to identify urban features such as roads
and buildings, as well as changes in water quality.
• Band 4 (0.76-0.90 μm): This band is particularly useful for detecting changes in
vegetation cover and health.
• Band 5 (1.55-1.75 μm): This band can help to identify changes in soil moisture,
vegetation, and land use.
• Band 6 (10.4-12.5 μm): This band is sensitive to changes in surface temperature,
which can be useful for detecting urban heat islands and changes in land use.
• Band 7 (2.08-2.35 μm): This band can be used to detect changes in vegetation health
and moisture content.
By analyzing the changes in these spectral bands over time, it is possible to detect and
monitor urban changes such as land use conversion, new construction, and changes in
vegetation cover.
Landsat-8 OLI provides high-quality data in multiple spectral bands, with a spatial resolution
of 30 meters for most bands, and a revisit time of 16 days. This data can be used to identify
changes in land cover, such as urban expansion, deforestation, and agricultural practices. The
Landsat-8 OLI sensor provides high-resolution multispectral data with improved radiometric
calibration, spectral resolution, and signal-to-noise ratio compared to previous Landsat
sensors.
Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) imagery has been used for change detection
analysis since its launch in 2013 (USGS website). As a result, most studies (F. Ahmad et al.,
2017; Alqurashi et al., 2016; Bhatt et al., 2018; Cao et al., 2019; L. Chen et al., 2018) that
have been conducted since 2013 have utilized Landsat 8 OLI imagery for change detection,
especially for applications requiring a higher spatial resolution. It has been particularly useful
for monitoring changes in urban areas, where rapid expansion and development can have
significant impacts on the environment and the economy. Overall, the Landsat 8 OLI sensor
has provided an important tool for change detection studies, and it continues to be a valuable
resource for researchers, analysts, and policymakers.
However, it's important to note that earlier Landsat sensors, such as Landsat 5 and 7, are still
in use, and their data are still being used for change detection studies, particularly in cases
where longer time-series data are required. Also, the availability and quality of Landsat data
depend on various factors such as cloud cover, seasonal variations, and other factors that may
limit the use of Landsat 8 OLI imagery in some cases. Nonetheless, the Landsat 8 OLI sensor
has become a valuable resource for change detection studies and has significantly improved
the accuracy and reliability of these studies.
4.1.2. SPOT-5
SPOT 5 (Satellite pour l'Observation de la Terre) was a commercial Earth-imaging satellite
from CNES (Centre National D’Etudes Spatiales), the French Space Agency. It was launched
on 4 May 2002 and ceased operations after a malfunction in March 2015 (European space
agency website). SPOT-5 (XS) High-Resolution Geometry (HRG) has two HRG instruments,
each with a swath width of 60 km and a resolution of 2.5 meters. This makes it an excellent
tool for high-resolution remote sensing applications, such as change detection. (Deng et al.,
2008) made an attempt to use multisensor data with similar spatial resolution from different
image modes (SPOT-5 XS and Pan) as the primary source for multitemporal change
detection.
The high spatial resolution of SPOT-5 (XS) HRG allows for the detection of small changes
that may not be visible with lower-resolution sensors. Additionally, the stereo capability of
the sensor can be used to create digital elevation models, which can aid in the identification of
changes. Overall, SPOT-5 (XS) HRG is a valuable tool for change detection and other remote
sensing applications that require high spatial resolution and accurate data.
Figure 2: Color composition image of Landsat-7 enhanced thematic mapper (ETM) in 2001 (a); color composition image of
SPOT (systeme pour l’observation de la terre or earth observation satellite)-5 in 2003 (DENG et al., 2009)
(Agapiou et al., 2015) used a radiance calibrated Defence Meteorological Satellite Program
Operational Line Scanner(DMSP-OLS) night-time data set for 2010. A direct comparison of
this dataset with urban areas of 2010, as classified from the Landsat sensor, was applied to
evaluate the potential use of night-time images.
Figure 3: Sample of DMSP-OLS stable light product (2013) for the Yangtze River Delta, China. The red circles denote eight
sample prefectural-level cities (Zheng et al., 2020).
DMSP-OLS nighttime imagery can also be useful for monitoring natural disasters such as
wildfires and floods, as these events often produce changes in the patterns of nighttime lights.
By comparing images taken before and after the event, analysts can identify areas of change
and assess the impact of the disaster. Additionally, DMSP-OLS nighttime imagery has the
advantage of being collected continuously over time, which allows for long-term monitoring
and analysis of changes. This is particularly important for studying slow changes in land use
patterns, such as urbanization and deforestation. Overall, the use of DMSP-OLS nighttime
imagery for change detection analysis can provide valuable insights into the dynamic nature
of the Earth's surface and help inform policy and management decisions related to
urbanization, natural resource management, and disaster response (Huang et al., 2014).
Another example is the use of topographic maps or digital elevation models (DEMs) in
change detection for identifying changes in water bodies such as lakes or rivers. By
comparing a recent image with a topographic map or DEM, analysts can identify whether a
change in the water level is due to natural factors such as rainfall or snowmelt or due to
human intervention such as damming or diversion of water. In summary, ancillary data in
change detection provides additional context and information that can help improve the
accuracy and reliability of detecting changes between datasets.
This chapter discusses the use of remote sensing imagery classification for urban change
detection, specifically with Landsat TM, ETM+, OLI, and SPOT-5 sensors. It describes the
spectral bands of these sensors that are useful for detecting changes in urban areas, and
highlights the importance of Landsat 8 OLI in providing high-resolution data for change
detection studies. Finally, it mentions the advantages of SPOT-5's high spatial resolution for
detecting small changes in urban areas.
Chapter 5. Algorithm
The choice of an appropriate method or algorithm for a specific research endeavour is crucial
yet challenging since digital change detection is impacted by geographical, spectral, thematic,
and temporal restrictions, and because many change detection strategies are usable. The
change detection techniques are categorised into four categories for simplicity of
understanding:
5.1. Algebra
The algebra category comprises background removal, change vector analysis (CVA),
vegetation index differencing, image rationing, image differencing, and image regression.
These techniques locate changes but do not provide information on the nature of change
(Yuan et al., 2005b). These methods all use thresholds to identify the areas that have changed,
which is a common feature. These techniques, with the exception of CVA, are quite easy to
use, understand, and put into practice, but they are unable to offer comprehensive change
information matrices. The difficulty in choosing appropriate thresholds to detect the modified
areas is a drawback of the algebra category. In this category, choosing appropriate picture
bands or vegetation indices and choosing appropriate thresholds to identify the altered regions
are crucial for the change detection outcomes.
(Deng et al., 2008) utilised band selected from each new image to compare with each other
using change-detection approaches such as image differencing in extracting and quantifying
classes to detect and monitor land-use change in Hangzhou City, one of the most developed
regions in China. A more comprehensive CVA method that incorporates texture information
into the standard spectral-based CVA was utilised in order to accurately identify the LULC
alterations in rural–urban fringe area (He et al., 2011). Change Vector Analysis approach (An
et al., 2007) was utilised to compute Euclidean distance based on the shared object with the
CVA in order to extract the urban change information.
Tab 1: Summary of Algebra change detection techniques. (The five levels indicate the complexity of the change detection
techniques, from simplest 1 to the most complex 5.) (Lu et al., 2004)
The most often applied change detection technique in the algebra-based change detection
category is image differencing(Lu et al., 2004). It has been demonstrated that visible red band
image differencing is effective for change detection in semi-arid and dry settings, but it is
unclear if this is true in other environments, such as moist tropical areas. Since results rely on
the features of the study regions and the image data utilised, various writers have come to
different conclusions regarding which methodology, among the vegetation index differencing,
image ratioing, image regression, and CVA methods, offered the best results. Due to its low
capacity to identify changes, the background subtraction approach was rarely utilised.
5.2. Transformation
The PCA(Principal component analysis), KT(Tasselled cap), Gramm-Schmidt (GS), and Chi-
square transformations are within the transformation category. These approaches have the
benefit of eliminating data redundancy between bands and emphasising various information in
derived components. They are unable to offer comprehensive change matrices, and instead
rely on the user to choose thresholds to recognise regions that have changed. Another
drawback is how challenging it is to read and label the change information on the altered
images (Tewkesbury et al., 2015).
(Agapiou et al., 2015) applied Principal component analysis (PCA) to detect any significant
changes under the period examined (1984–2010) to comprehend the pattern of urban
development in the future, paying particular attention to locations near historic monuments.
(Deng et al., 2008)For extracting and quantifying classes to detect and track land-use change
in Hangzhou City, one of the most developed locations in China, a new technique combines
PCA with hybrid categorization. The main goal of PCA was to keep as much variance in the
data set as feasible while reducing the dimensionality of a data set made up of several
connected variables.
PCA and KT are the techniques most frequently employed to identify information that has
changed or remained the same in the transformation category. Many change detection
applications seem to benefit from the KT approach. The fact that KT transform coefficients
are independent of the image scenes, in contrast to PCA, gives it an edge over the latter. Due
to their greater complexity as compared to PCA and KT approach, the GS and Chi-square
techniques are utilised considerably less frequently in actual practise. Additionally, the
majority of commercial remote sensing image processing software does not support GS and
Chi-square approaches.
Tab 2: Summary of Transformation techniques for Change Detection. (The five levels indicate the complexity of the change
detection techniques, from simplest 1 to the most complex 5.) (Lu et al., 2004)
5.3. Classification
Post-classification comparison, spectral-temporal combined analysis, expectation-
maximization method (EM) change detection, unsupervised change detection, hybrid change
detection, and ANN are all included in the classification category. These techniques are based
on categorised pictures, where high training sample data quality and quantity are essential to
achieve accurate classification results. The capacity to provide a matrix of change information
and lessen the external influence of atmospheric and environmental variables across the multi-
temporal pictures are these technologies' main advantages. However, choosing suitably large
and high-quality training sample sets for image classification can be challenging, especially
for the classification of historical picture data.
The capacity to provide a matrix of change information and lessen the external influence of
atmospheric and environmental variables across multi-temporal pictures are these
technologies' main advantages. However, choosing suitably large and high-quality training
sample sets for image classification can be challenging, especially for the classification of
historical picture data. Unsatisfactory change detection findings are frequently the
consequence of the time-consuming and challenging process of developing highly accurate
classifications, particularly when high-quality training sample data are not available.
While performing buffer assessments along the metro lines and stations, (S. Ahmad et al.,
2016) uses maximum likelihood supervised classification to fill up the research gaps by
describing if and how an urban rail infrastructure, along with the complementing policies that
follow, results in a change in land cover. (Afifi & Darwish, 2018) Cross tabulation was used
to build the two algorithms of supervised maximum likelihood and post-classification change
detection for monitoring urban sprawl and change detection.
A layer arithmetic operation is frequently used in hybrid change detection to identify changed
elements, then supervised or unsupervised direct classification is used to provide meaning to
the altered features. For example (Seto et al., 2002)after creating a CVA to show the
radiometric change's magnitude and direction, individual land cover transitions were labelled
using supervised classification. While (Doxani et al., 2012)used a knowledge-based
classification to filter and categorise the data after first applying a MAD transform to
highlight altered regions in VHR imaging. These examples demonstrate a research trend that
aims to employ many stages of change comparison to address specific issues. This tendency is
expected to persist as workflows get more intricate.
(Bhatt et al., 2018) compared unsupervised classification technique such as K-means with
OBIA for change detection in highly urbanized areas and finds that OBIA's classification
accuracy ranges from 82.2 to 90.1%, which is high enough to qualify it as the most popular
developing approach. Although k-means provides the maximum accuracy attainable is just
78%.
(Alqurashi et al., 2016) In this work, the categorization of LULC maps was carried out using
the OBIA approach. The total accuracies in all five cities ranged from 82% to 96%, indicating
extremely reliable findings to estimate LULC changes. In the study, both OBIA and
conventional pixel-based methods worked effectively. This could be because of the medium
spatial resolution, like that of Landsat, which offered about identical scales for both pixels and
objects.
Figure 5: Study area, i.e. NCT of Delhi, India (Bhatt et al., 2018)
6.2. Objective of the study
The objective of the research was to create a technique for detecting changes in highly
urbanized regions by utilizing satellite imagery over time. The study investigates the
efficiency of object-oriented classification as compared to unsupervised algorithms, such as k-
means, for detecting changes. To capture a broad range of pattern variations, the research
obtained a sequence of satellite images taken by Landsat 5 (TM) and Landsat 8 (OLI)
between 1993 and 2014. The study utilizes three spectral indices, specifically the Normalized
Difference Built-up Index (NDBI) to characterize built-up areas, the Modified Normalized
Difference Water Index (MNDWI) to identify open water bodies, and the Modified Soil
Adjusted Vegetation Index 2 (MSAVI2) to symbolize green vegetation (Bhatt et al., 2018).
Figure 6: Indices image generated for the Landsat imagery of study area for the year 1993. (a) Raw image, (b) MNDWI, (c)
MSAVI2 and (d) NDBI (Bhatt et al., 2018)
6.3. Results
Employing spectral indices significantly decreases data correlation and redundancy between
original multispectral bands, thus reducing spectral confusion between the different land-use
classes. During the object-based image analysis (OBIA), not only were the spectral indices
MNDWI, NDBI, and MSAVI2 created from the multispectral image, but also spatial and
contextual features were generated. These spatial, spectral, and contextual features were then
analyzed and utilized during the classification process. Figure below displays the classified
image created through object-based theory, as well as the image produced using an
unsupervised classification method such as k-means (Bhatt et al., 2018).
Figure 7: Classified images for the Landsat imagery of study area. 1993 (a, e), 2000 (b, f), 2008 (c, g), 2014 (d, h) (Bhatt et
al., 2018).
Additionally, the study compared the results of the k-means classification with those obtained
through OBIA. The comparison was based on the Percentage Correctly Matched (PCM),
which measures the percentage at which the k-means results match with the OBIA results,
with the latter being taken as the reference.
Tab 3: Percentage wise distribution of classes and PCM evaluation for k-means(Bhatt et al., 2018)
The table shows that during the study period, there was a significant increase in built-up area
from 31% to 55.69%, while vegetation areas decreased from 59.5% to 38.01%. There was
little change in the water body area and a slight decrease in barren land. The rise in built-up
area can be attributed to the growth of industrial areas, educational institutions, IT hubs, and
corresponding infrastructure development in the NCT of Delhi. The OBIA method achieved
an accuracy of classification ranging from 82.2% to 90.1%, which is considered good, while
k-means only achieved a maximum accuracy of 78%.
6.4. Summary
In summary, the study used time-series satellite imagery and object-based image analysis
(OBIA) to detect changes in the urbanization of NCT Delhi from 1993 to 2014. Spectral
indices such as NDBI, MNDWI, and MSAVI2 were utilized along with texture-based features
like GLCM to reduce data dimensionality and decrease the dependency on spectral
characteristics. The results showed a clear increase in built-up area and a decrease in
vegetation over time, likely due to urban development. The OBIA approach produced a
significantly higher overall accuracy (90.1%) compared to the unsupervised technique of k-
means, and was recommended as a promising semi-automated tool for classification of
remotely sensed satellite data in urban areas. The use of OBIA with traditional spectral
indices provides dimensionality reduction and produces classified maps that have a great
correspondence with reality. An expert system based on OBIA proved to be relevant in
extracting accurate change information from remotely sensed imagery.
Chapter 7. Analysis
This analysis suggests that there are two main approaches to change detection studies: place-
based and algorithm-based. Place-based studies are focused on a specific location and aim to
understand the urban land change within that area. Algorithm-based studies, on the other
hand, are more focused on the technical and methodological advances of change detection
methods and are less concerned with the specific geographic context. Place-based studies may
be more useful for policymakers and urban planners, as they provide detailed information on
the urbanization process in a particular location. Algorithm-based studies, however, may be
more useful for researchers and developers looking to improve the effectiveness of change
detection methods. In both types of studies, the location is an important factor, but it is
approached differently depending on the focus of the research.
(An et al., 2007) used cloud-free Landsat TM images with the pixel size of 30m×30m
acquired on 1997-05-16 and 2004-5-19 to extract the urban change information using object-
oriented method with the spectral and texture information.
In order to determine land cover and land-cover change information for forest, urban, and
agricultural categories across a seven-state region in the United States, 2000 AVHRR satellite
data was coupled with a 1980 national-scale land-cover categorization based on aerial photo
interpretation (Bergen et al., 2005).
Overall, the timeframe of urban land transformation studies depends on the research question
being asked and the availability of data. While short- to medium-term studies are common,
longer-term studies can also provide valuable insights into the history and evolution of urban
areas.
At the outset, the intention of the study was to evaluate and contrast the reported accuracies of
all the algorithms included in the study. However, this task presented challenges. While 96%
of the studies we examined included some form of accuracy assessment, the assessments were
frequently not readily comparable due to variations in criteria, assessment techniques, and
reporting methods. For example certain research papers have presented accuracy results using
different measures, such as overall accuracy, user accuracy, producer accuracy, and class-
specific accuracy (e.g., for urban or forest areas), as well as kappa statistics based on the
Congalton or Congalton and Green methods. Meanwhile, other studies have used other
indicators such as the percentage of pixels that have changed or remained the same, or
positive, negative, and no-change accuracy assessments (Yuan et al., 2005b).
There is a significant difference in the level of rigor used to assess accuracy, ranging from
studies that simply state that classified images were compared to on-the-ground status without
providing details, to studies that use detailed methodologies, sampling strategies, and analysis
of results. Qualitative visual validation methods are increasingly being used, often involving
visual comparison of sample pixels with Google Earth. While this approach allows for ease of
assessment and validation of remote areas, it lacks quantitative validation values at the pixel
level.
One alternative method for evaluating the effectiveness of an algorithm is to compare it with
an existing method. Comparison-based studies involve directly comparing and contrasting
methods using the same criteria and accuracy assessments. These studies can help identify the
strengths and weaknesses of different methodological approaches. For example (Im et al.,
2008) conducted a study where they compared 5 different methods at the pixel and object
levels, using object and neighborhood correlation images. They also compared a decision tree
classification algorithm with a nearest neighbor method. In another study, (Tang et al., 2013)
compared three different change vector analysis (CVA) methods: morphological CVA,
parcel-based CVA, and MBI-based CVA (morphological building index).
This chapter discusses the two main approaches to change detection studies - place-based and
algorithm-based - and their respective benefits for policymakers, urban planners, researchers,
and developers. The timeframe of urban land transformation studies varies based on the
research question and data availability, with short to medium-term studies being common.
Accuracy assessment is also crucial in evaluating the effectiveness of remote sensing
algorithms, but variations in criteria and reporting methods make comparisons challenging.
Chapter 8. Discussion and Way Forward
Although there are significant gaps in knowledge regarding urban land change, there can be
five strategies that can help reduce or close these gaps. Firstly, studies on urban land change
should cover a wider geographic area, particularly in Global South cities like India and
Nigeria, where urban populations are projected to double by 2050. Secondly, there needs to be
more studies focused on smaller and medium-sized cities, which make up a significant portion
of the world's total population. Developing algorithms to detect micro-urbanization poses new
challenges due to the scale of land changes. Thirdly, monitoring urban areas more frequently
is necessary to understand urban change dynamics on a fine timescale. Fourthly, more studies
should examine within-urban and volumetric change, especially changes in urban form and
structure. Lastly, it is essential to improve the reproducibility, replicability, and comparability
of results. One approach is to consistently create and document clear workflows that outline
the series of steps, tasks, and methods used to implement an algorithm.
This analysis provides guidance for selecting an appropriate method. One recommendation is
for users to decide whether methodology or geographic area is more important. For example,
an application-specific method may be different from a geography-specific algorithm. The
number of available images and the technical capacity of users should also be taken into
account. Simpler methods may be more appropriate for certain contexts unless there is a clear
benefit to using a highly complex method. Areas with persistent cloud cover may not be
suitable for very high temporal frequency methods.
According to the literature studied, there are gaps in algorithm development that can be filled
by the developer community. However, many user needs can be met by using existing
algorithms rather than developing something new. There is a wide range of methods available
for users who want to monitor growth. Initially, the goal was to create a comprehensive "best
practices guide" for urban land change science information users. However, it was difficult to
create such a guide for several reasons. One reason is that algorithms have become more
complex and specific as remote sensing-based change detection science has developed.
Another reason is that the types of changes urban remote sensing scientists are measuring
have become more diverse, from impervious surface to three-dimensional building changes to
destruction due to hazards or natural disasters. As a result, it is challenging to recommend a
few "best" methods for a specific type of change and even less so for a particular geography.
Furthermore, accuracy assessments of different methods and types of changes may not be
directly comparable, as they often use different validation techniques. For example,
comparing binary change information with "to-from" class changes, where urban land change
is a small part of the overall land change, is challenging. Thus, it was not possible to
quantitatively compare accuracy assessments of all algorithms analyzed in a meaningful way.
Comparing methods through studies can help refine decision-making for both algorithm
developers and users, but these decisions are not always reported or explained, and providing
such explanations could be valuable for others facing similar decisions and trade-offs.
Remote sensing-based change detection can be a useful tool for assessing urban risks, as it
enables the identification and monitoring of changes in urban areas that may increase the risk
of natural disasters, environmental degradation, and other hazards. However, while change
detection provides valuable information about the physical changes occurring in urban areas,
it does not necessarily provide a complete picture of the risks and vulnerabilities associated
with those changes. To move from change detection to urban risk assessment, it is important
to consider the broader socio-economic and environmental context in which those changes are
occurring. This may involve incorporating additional data sources, such as demographic and
land-use data, and engaging with local communities to understand their perceptions of risk
and vulnerability.
One approach to urban risk assessment that incorporates both physical changes and socio-
economic factors is the Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) framework. This framework involves
a multi-hazard approach that considers the likelihood and potential impact of various hazards,
as well as the vulnerability and exposure of the population and infrastructure. DRR can be
applied at different spatial scales, from individual buildings to entire cities, and can inform a
range of interventions, from infrastructure development to community engagement and
capacity-building. To implement the DRR framework using remote sensing-based data, it is
necessary to identify the specific hazards and vulnerabilities of the urban area in question and
develop indicators that capture those factors. These indicators can then be integrated with
change detection data to provide a comprehensive assessment of urban risks.
Moving forward, the aim of my Master’s thesis will be to focus on learning about urban risk
assessment and applying it in the Indian context. This is an important and timely topic given
the increasing urbanization and vulnerability to natural disasters in India. Urban risk
assessment is a crucial tool for understanding and mitigating the risks associated with
urbanization, and it involves identifying and evaluating the hazards, vulnerabilities, and
capacities of urban areas.
To carry out my research, I will familiarize myself with the concepts, methods, and tools used
in Urban Risk Assessment(URA) . This will involve conducting a comprehensive literature
review to understand the current state of knowledge and best practices in the field. I will also
be learning about the various types of hazards that are prevalent in urban areas, such as
floods, earthquakes, and landslides, and the factors that contribute to vulnerability, such as
poverty, inadequate infrastructure, and social inequalities.
Once I have a solid understanding of the theory and methods of urban risk assessment, I can
begin to apply them in the Indian context. This will involve collecting data on the hazards,
vulnerabilities, and capacities of specific urban areas in India and using this information to
develop risk profiles and maps. I will also identify and evaluate the effectiveness of existing
risk reduction measures and propose new interventions to mitigate the risks associated with
urbanization in India. Overall, my Master’s thesis on urban risk assessment in the Indian
context has the potential to make a valuable contribution to the field of urban planning and
disaster risk reduction. By applying the concepts and methods of urban risk assessment in a
real-world context, you can help to improve the resilience of urban areas in India and
contribute to the broader goal of sustainable and equitable urban development.
What are the band designations for the Landsat Satellites? (n.d.). Retrieved April 28, 2023,
from https://www.usgs.gov/faqs/what-are-band-designations-landsat-satellites
GHSL - Global Human Settlement Layer. (2016, July 06). Retrieved April 28, 2023, from
https://ghsl.jrc.ec.europa.eu/