Hydro Graph 2
Hydro Graph 2
• Duration
• Lag Time
• Time of Concentration
• Rising Limb
• Recession Limb (falling limb)
• Peak Flow
• Time to Peak (rise time)
• Recession Curve
• Separation
• Base flow
Duration of
excess
precipitation.
Lag time
Time of
concentration
Base flow
0.0000
100.0000
200.0000
300.0000
400.0000
500.0000
600.0000
700.0000
0. 0
16
00
0.
32
0
0. 0
48
00
0.
64
0
0. 0
80
00
0.
96
0
1. 0
12
0
1. 0
28
00
1.
44
0
1. 0
60
00
1.
76
0
1. 0
92
00
CVE 308
2.
Surface
08
0
Response
2. 0
24
00
2.
40
0
2. 0
56
0
2. 0
72
00
2.
88
0
3. 0
04
00
Baseflow
3.
20
0
3. 0
36
00
3.
52
0
3. 0
68
00
Derived Unit Hydrograph
21
Derived Unit Hydrograph
700.0000
600.0000 Total
Hydrograph
500.0000
Surface
400.0000 Response
300.0000
Baseflow
200.0000
100.0000
0.0000
0.0000 0.5000 1.0000 1.5000 2.0000 2.5000 3.0000 3.5000 4.0000
Rules of Thumb :
… the storm should be fairly uniform in nature and the
excess precipitation should be equally as uniform throughout
the basin. This may require the initial conditions throughout
the basin to be spatially similar.
… Second, the storm should be relatively constant in time,
meaning that there should be no breaks or periods of no
precipitation.
… Finally, the storm should produce at least an inch of
excess precipitation (the area under the hydrograph after
correcting for baseflow).
25000 0,8
0,7
20000
0,6
Precipitation (inches)
0,5
15000
Flow (cfs)
0,4
10000
0,3
0,2
5000
0,1
0 0
0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96 10 4 11 2 12 0 12 8
Time (hrs.)
... generally accepted that the inflection point on the recession limb
of a hydrograph is the result of a change in the controlling physical
processes of the excess precipitation flowing to the basin outlet.
In this example, baseflow is considered to be a straight line
connecting that point at which the hydrograph begins to rise rapidly
and the inflection point on the recession side of the hydrograph.
the inflection point may be found by plotting the hydrograph in semi-
log fashion with flow being plotted on the log scale and noting the time
at which the recession side fits a straight line.
100000
1000
Flow (cfs)
100
10
1
29 34 39 44 49 54 59 64 69 74 79 84 89 94 99 10 4 10 9 11 4 11 9 12 4 12 9 13 4
Time (hrs.)
25000
20000
15000
Flow (cfs)
10000
5000
0
0
7
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
70
77
84
91
98
105
112
119
126
133
Time (hrs.)
25000
20000
15000
Flow (cfs)
10000
5000
0
0 7 14 21 28 35 42 49 56 63 70 77 84 91 98 10 5 11 2 11 9 12 6 13 3
Time (hrs.)
25000
Storm #1 hydrograph
15000
Flow (cfs)
Storm # 1 unit
hydrograph
10000
Storm #1
baseflow
5000
0
0
7
14
21
28
35
42
49
56
63
70
77
84
91
98
105
112
119
126
133
Time (hrs.)
0.8
0.7
0.6
Precipitation (inches)
0.5
0.3
0.2
0.1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Time (hrs.)
0,9
Small amounts of
0,6
excess precipitation at
beginning and end may
0,5
be omitted.
0,4
0,3
0,2
0,1
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
Time (hrs.)
60000,00
50000,00
40000,00
Flow (cfs)
30000,00
20000,00
10000,00
0,00
0
6
12
18
24
30
36
42
48
54
60
66
72
78
84
90
96
102
108
114
120
Time (hrs.)
14000,00 60000,00
12000,00
50000,00
Unit Hydrograph Flow (cfs/inch)
S-curves are
10000,00 lagged by 1 hour
and the difference 40000,00
is found.
Flow (cfs)
8000,00 1-hour unit
hydrograph resulting
30000,00
from lagging S-
6000,00 curves and
multiplying the
difference by 6. 20000,00
4000,00
10000,00
2000,00
0,00 0,00
Time (hrs.)
•There does exist a shortcut method for changing the duration of the
unit hydrograph if the two durations are multiples of one another.
•For example, if you had a two hour unit hydrograph and you
wanted to change it to a four hour unit hydrograph.
•First, a two hour unit hydrograph is given and a four hour unit
hydrograph is needed.
•There are two possiblities, develop the S - curve or since they are
multiples use the shortcut method.
Tim e (h r) Q
0 0
1 2
2 4
3 6
4 10
5 6
6 4
7 3
8 2
9 1
10 0
7/5/2019 CVE 308 41
Shortcut Method Example
Tim e (h r) Q D is p la c e d U H G
0 0
1 2
2 4 0
3 6 2
4 10 4
5 6 6
6 4 10
7 3 6
8 2 4
9 1 3
10 0 2
11 1
12 0
7/5/2019 CVE 308 42
Shortcut Method Example
Tim e (h r) Q D is p la c e d U H G S um
0 0 0
1 2 2
2 4 0 4
3 6 2 8
4 10 4 14
5 6 6 12
6 4 10 14
7 3 6 9
8 2 4 6
9 1 3 4
10 0 2 2
11 1 1
12 0 0
• Snyder
• SCS
• Time-area
• IHABBS Implementation Plan :
NOHRSC Homepage
http://www.nohrsc.nws.gov/
http://www.nohrsc.nws.gov/98/html/uhg/index.html
• Since peak flow and time of peak flow are two of the most important
parameters characterizing a unit hydrograph, the Snyder method
employs factors defining these parameters, which are then used in
the synthesis of the unit graph (Snyder, 1938).
• The parameters are Cp, the peak flow factor, and Ct, the lag factor.
• The basic assumption in this method is that basins which have
similar physiographic characteristics are located in the same area
will have similar values of Ct and Cp.
• Therefore, for ungaged basins, it is preferred that the basin be near
or similar to gaged basins for which these coefficients can be
determined.
t LAG
tduration
5.5
t LAG
tbase 3
8
640 AC p
q peak
t LAG
Flow ratios
Cum. Mass
0.8
0.6
Q/Qpeak
0.4
0.2
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
T/Tpeak
Tlag
0.8
Flow ratios
Cum. Mass
Q/Qpeak
Triangular
0.6
Point of
Inflection
Tc
0.4
0.2
0
0.0 Tp 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Tb
T/Tpeak
Tlag
Tr Tb - Tp 1.67 x Tp 0.8
Flow ratios
Cum. Mass
Q/Qpeak
Triangular
0.6
Point of
Inflection
Tc
0.4
qpT p qpT r qp
Q= + = (T p +T r )
2 2 2 0.2
0
0.0 Tp 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0
Tb
T/Tpeak
2Q
qp=
T p +T r
654.33 x 2 x A x Q
qp= The 645.33 is the conversion used for
T p +T r
delivering 1-inch of runoff (the area
under the unit hydrograph) from 1-square
484 A Q
qp= mile in 1-hour (3600 seconds).
Tp
484 A Q
qp=
Tp
Tc D 1.7 T p
D
+ 0.6 T c = T p
2
• Regression Eqs.
• Segmental Approach
L0.8 (S 1) 0.7
Tlag
1900(%Slope) 0.5
Flow Type K
Small Tributary - Permanent or intermittent 2.1
streams which appear as solid or dashed
blue lines on USGS topographic maps.
Waterway - Any overland flow route which 1.2 Sorell & Hamilton, 1991
is a well defined swale by elevation
contours, but is not a stream section as
defined above.
Sheet Flow - Any other overland flow path 0.48
which does not conform to the definition of
a waterway.
• In general, it can be said that the triangular version will not cause or
introduce noticeable differences in the simulation of a storm event,
particularly when one is concerned with the peak flow.
• For long term simulations, the triangular unit hydrograph does have
a potential impact, due to the shape of the recession limb.
• The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (HEC 1990) fits a Clark unit
hydrograph to match the peak flows estimated by the Snyder unit
hydrograph procedure.
• It is also possible to fit a synthetic or mathematical function to the
peak flow and timing parameters of the desired unit hydrograph.
• Aron and White (1982) fitted a gamma probability distribution using
peak flow and time to peak data.
t a e t b
f (t; a, b) a1
b (a 1)
500.0000
450.0000
400.0000
350.0000
300.0000
250.0000
200.0000
150.0000
100.0000
50.0000
0.0000
0.0000 1.0000 2.0000 3.0000 4.0000 5.0000 6.0000
100%
Time
Q % Area of conc.
Time Time
40
35
25
20
15
10
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Time Increment (hrs)
0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200
Time (hrs)
2t
c
2 R t
90
80
70
Area Increments (square miles)
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Time Increments (2 hrs)
30000
25000
Translated Unit Hydrograph
20000
15000
10000
5000
0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Time Increments (2 hrs)
16000
14000
12000
10000
Flow (cfs/inch)
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (hrs)
16000
14000
12000
10000
Flow (cfs/inch)
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Time (hrs)