Executive Summary

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TO COMPLEMENT two Philippine progress reports on the Millennium


Development Goals (MDGs), the study was conducted to track down mid-term
performance levels of 9 provinces and cities of Bicol region in regard to the
MDGs.

Objectives
It sought to tackle two objectives:

(a) Address the information gap at the local level, with the end view of developing
a tool for awareness raising, alliance building and renewal of commitments to
realize the MDGs by 2015; and

(b) Identify and discuss issues and concerns regarding the MDG benchmarks at
the local and regional levels, with the end view of strengthening regional
monitoring for these development goals.

Methodology
The study used two sets of data: (1) regionally collected time-series data on the
indicators for the eight MDG benchmarks, which came from regional units of the
national government agencies, and (2) corresponding local data, both panel and
cross-sectional, from the Naga city government.

Analysis focused on Bicol and the 9 localities’ progress towards the MDG, using a
regional target constructed for each goal as benchmark. If the regional target is
met for the desired year, an LGU is said to be “on track.” It also tackled data
issues that arose in the process, using the Naga data as comparator.

Findings
Using a graphical table mapping individual performance, the study established
the following:

Regional. Bicol’s progress relative to the MDGs is mixed, with it on track


towards achieving 4 of the 7 goals. The absence of data for Goal 8 (“Develop a
Global Partnership for Development”) precluded progress assessment at the
regional and local levels. Its performance by goal is summarized as follows:

ƒ Goal 1. Mostly on track towards reducing poverty by half, both in terms of


income and subsistence incidence.
ƒ Goal 2. Off track in ensuring that all children are able to access and complete
primary education (up to Grade III). Mostly like to miss target in regard to
full elementary education (up to Grade VI).
ƒ Goal 3. On track toward attaining gender parity towards girls. Tends to come
at the expense of higher levels of dropouts among boys.

ii
ƒ Goal 4. On track towards reducing child and infant mortality by two-thirds.
But declining immunization coverage might put it at risk.
ƒ Goal 5. Off track in reducing maternal mortality by three-fourths.
ƒ Goal 6. On track towards halting and reversing the prevalence of and deaths
due to HIV/AIDS, malaria and TB.
ƒ Goal 7. Off track in halving the proportion of people with no access to safe
water and sanitation services.

Sub-regional. The same table shows that Naga City is on track towards attaining
all MDGs save for the Goal 2, thereby validating the recognition it recently earned
from the UNDP.

On the other hand, performance among provinces is mixed, with Albay,


Camarines Sur, Catanduanes and Sorsogon satisfying the most number of
indicators.

Conclusion
In the process of preparing the report, a number of data issues surfaced. These
include gaps, typified by the absence of indicators for Goal 8, and some
inconsistencies between regional and local data. Another is the issue of quality,
where questions on validity, e.g. participation rate in cities that include non-
resident enrolment and exclude private school enrolment, can mask problematic
situations on the ground. Finally, there is also the need to ensure that the MDG
data will matter, anchored on the end-user’s ability to link it to policy.

At the same time, it was noted that good local practices abound in the
region aside from the well-publicized initiatives in Naga City. This is indicated
by documented but lesser known barangay initiatives in Bicol, as reported by the
DILG, as well as effective institutional performance at the provincial level by
Albay, Camarines Norte and Catanduanes in regard to the MDGs which deserve
further study.

Moreover, the need for a more relevant local MDG tracking system was
underscored, guided by continuous improvement in each of the Millennium
Goals. This tracking system is founded on a deeper local understanding of the
various dimensions of poverty, and more importantly, how local plans,
programs and activities can address these poverty dimensions to bring about
sustained, incremental improvements.

This local tracking system emphasizes three basic features: (a) outcomes over
outputs, where data collection and analysis are focused on locally available MDG
indicators as specified by the national government through the NSCB; (b)
assessment over monitoring, where analysis does not end on the data per se but
their implication on the bigger picture; and (c) MDG-driven local action, which
links MDG data to action, in the process giving meaning to the whole exercise.

iii
Finally, a local MDG tracking system must be complemented by social
accountability mechanisms that would communicate its results to
stakeholders in a regular manner. For instance, it can be integrated into the
mayor or governor’s annual report to his constituents, either in a meeting of the
sanggunian or the local development council.

Recommendations
To address the information gap in regard to the MDGs and intensify their
localization, the following measures are recommended:

1. More localized MDG tracking down to the city/municipal level. Ideally, MDG
progress assessment similar to this exercise should be pursued and
institutionalized at (a) the regional level, for provinces and cities; (b) provincial
level, for municipalities; and (c) at the city/municipal level, for the barangays.

2. More effective alignment between national and local agencies. To improve


outcomes, national line agencies (through their regional and sub-regional field
units), the local government units and their civil society partners should align
their activities, thereby achieving synergy and greater efficiency.

3. Documentation of less-known good practices. Aided by academic institutions


in the region, these should focus on local initiatives that address any or a
combination of the eight MDGs and, more importantly, yield concrete outcomes.

4. More stringent MDG assessment for better performing localities. Better


performing localities – like Naga, for instance – should be measured against
localized targets that are usually higher than the regional average. This way, they
will compete against themselves, not the middle-of-the-road regional benchmark.

5. Dissemination of local MDG tracking results. Aside from participative events


where local MDG results can be communicated regularly – like the annual mayor
or governor’s report – reader-friendly brochures, flyers and other MDG promo
collaterals should be produced and disseminated among key stakeholders and
constituents. Their digital equivalent should be made available through
regionally-maintained webpages featuring provincial, city and municipal reports.

iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................... i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................ ii
TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................. v
CHAPTER
I INTRODUCTION ..................................................................... 1

II METHODOLOGY .................................................................. 4

III THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS ....................... 6

IV THE MDGs IN BICOL REGION ............................................... 11

V CONCLUSION .......................................................................... 33

REFERENCES ................................................................................................ 38

ANNEX “A”: PROGRESS ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY ....................... 39

You might also like